On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 09:54:02 AM +0200, io ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> I have said just that publishing ALSO the sender address *is* a good
> thing that can help other users, and surely helped me: I have found
> several times people mentioning in mailing list "I'll write a macro
> so-and-so": the
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 21:07:20 PM +0100, Jim Ottaway
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > You are aware there's a Windows version of OpenOffice.org, right?
> > I would assume the original authors have already read documents
> > like http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html ?
[...]
> It's ac
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 16:45:39 PM -0700, NoOp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I don't receive a local copy as I only access via the gmane nntp server.
> However, when I look at your msg source via gmane those IP's etc are
> _not_ shown. So what is being put on the archives is more extensive than
> wha
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 03:19:34 AM -0400, Lars D. Noodén
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> What I am talking about is that software is a tool. It is a tool to
> help with teaching or research.
or many other jobs without equally far-reaching, ethicallly important
implications. Which makes my point below
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 20:27:01 PM +1000, Terry
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I begin to wonder, when people no longer need to download, install
> and update, such software themselves, how many will continue to do
> so.
Probably a lot. Online apps and file storage are enough when one is
not concerne
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 07:48:20 AM +1000, Sandy
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I doubt that will be an issue for most people.
ask any business owner if they are going to like processing theirs or
their customers data on an Internet connection and a server which may
even be in a foreign country. Now t
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 11:11:26 AM +1000, Sandy ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> >ask any business owner if they are going to like processing theirs
> >or their customers data on an Internet connection and a server
> >which may even be in a foreign country.
> As a former business owner, I don't see a pr
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 11:46:32 AM +0200, Cor Nouws ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Max Vallejo Reyna wrote:
>
> >posiblility in Impress to export the presentations into a new
> >format: a executable windows EXE, wich may contain the presentation
> >with an integrated Open Office viewer, so we will no
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 09:19:12 AM -0500, Max Vallejo Reyna
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Also, i have a question: are you sure it will be smaller (in space)
> to carry the presentation AND the portable version of Open
> Office. This includes writer, base, impress, etc.
> Cmon, partners, obviously,
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 11:45:20 AM +, Chris Bradley
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I was wondering if somewhere in the pipeline you have thought about
> having a Qualification that States that you Are able to Use, Install
> and troubleshoot a set version of open office.
Besides the Ingots, which
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 09:46:45 AM +0100, Kai Sommerfeld
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> The new project makes the connection between OOo and ODF crisp and
> clear, but we do not want every user of the toolkit to become an OOo
> expert.
As Ian already pointed out, the connection has _always_ been cri
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 01:36:36 AM +0100, Christoph Noack
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'm not sure about the next one: I'd like to see some kind of
> Issuezilla topic to collect issues that cover the perception of the
> user.
>[...]
> I don't think that the difference between UI/UX is obvious to th
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 13:49:59 PM +0100, Peter Vandenabeele
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> What would be the right place to discuss the standardization
> of Business Intelligence data in ODF ?
>
> What I mean is e.g. the use case where a document that is
> representing a PO (Purchase Order), uses so
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 15:52:55 PM -0600, Florencio Marchelli
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> a) "The Wikipedia Connection"
> Just Alt-Click (or any combination you prefer) over a word or
> marked text and OO will open Wikipedia with the definition (if any)
> for the selection.
> All of us have
Doug,
a couple of general comments:
On Sun, May 06, 2007 12:44:29 PM -0700, Doug Koup ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> I understand all the advantages of the open formats. I also
> understand that these formats will never be used unless people give
> up the crutch that is proprietary formats. Sadly,
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 00:17:51 AM -0500, Robert Derman
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I know that this lack of a suitable Outlook replacement is the last
> major thing standing in the way of many Fortune 500 companies
> adopting OOo.
While do I agree that the current FLOSS alternatives are not reall
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 19:37:52 PM +0200, Tomas Lanczos
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> M. Fioretti wrote:
> >THE reason #1 why "many Fortune 500 companies don't adopt OOo yet"
> >is the simple fact that they still have to keep, modify and
> >exchange millions of l
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 00:39:26 AM -0600, Larry Gusaas
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >>>FOSS is not just about requesting something but doing it yourself.
> >>>
> >>So are you saying that if I can't program or provide a programmer I
> >>shouldn't use FOSS? That is pretty narrow minded.
> >
> >
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 02:59:06 AM -0500, Alexandro Colorado
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Great marco except that someone in the end has to code this things
> if we want them to move forward. This is a great answer for the
> user, but not a great answer for the product.
I was NOT saying that users
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 03:16:40 AM -0500, Alexandro Colorado
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Here is where you are wrong. Developers don't have to code to fit users
> need. Developers code because they want to and to make technological
> difference.
Here you ignore, for example, students developi
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 02:34:09 AM -0500, Alexandro Colorado
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 02:21:44 -0500, Cor Nouws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >André Wyrwa wrote:
> >
> >>maybe it's time to look at the real issues that this thread
> >>started off of? The major one being that
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 02:30:56 AM -0500, Alexandro Colorado
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I am just stating the facts, developers do stuff because they want
> to and they think is cool, which might not be very cool or useful to
> the users.
Then how can you keep saying that in FOSS users must be de
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 09:17:06 AM +, jonathon ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> > - A better way of showing 'what's changed' than Release notes just
> > referencing bug numbers
>
> Would you rather that the entire bug report was cut and pasted
> there? Or are you advocating that people be unable to
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 13:29:07 PM +0300, Lars Noodén
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> jonathon wrote:
> > If the only solution you will accept is a monolithic
> > solution...
>
> There's the psychology of it. Many C*Os think of technology as a
> monolith and, if not, are attracted to the thought anyw
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 15:42:04 PM +0300, Lars Noodén
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> M. Fioretti wrote:
>
> > Forgetting this fact of life is an all too common mistakes of
> > several FOSS advocates, who fail to reach people because they seem
> > always to give for grante
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 01:05:42 AM +0100, Paul Campbell
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Advance fee fraud
>
> Don't bother replying to this guy.
No, but maybe a couple of suggestions won't hurt:
1) you did a "reply-all", both to the list and to that "Mr, Pete"
address. Remember not to do it next
On Thu, September 6, 2007 4:12 pm, RÄzvan Sandu wrote:
> Since it's my first post on this list, please let me introduce myself:
> RÄzvan Sandu
> In the light of recent events - rejection of OOXML by ISO - I've discussed
> with many people on http://www.nooxml.org . They pointed me to this lis
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 18:02:48 PM +0300, Nicu Buculei
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> M. Fioretti wrote:
> >
> >2) About corporate servers filtering incoming mail: if what you want
> > is to make ODF the only format worldwide (and I agree on this) it
> > is much more
On Thu, September 6, 2007 7:19 pm, RÄzvan Sandu wrote:
> Hello Marco and all,
>
>>> it becomes increasingly critical that we *quickly* migrate from binary
>>> Microsoft documents... directly to ODF
In case it weren't clear enough from my initial answer, I agree on the fact
that it is crucial to
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 09:30:10 AM -0700, Sheila Bliesath
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I am wondering if you have a letter that would hit the high points
> of why governments should switch in a one page document.
Sheila,
the high point of why governments should switch to OpenOffice is
simply the f
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 10:21:53 AM +0530, Saurabhk Mishra
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi,
> Please unsubscribe me from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Saurabhk,
almost every mailing list in the world is automated. No other list
_subscriber_ can do this for you. Now, every email you get from
discuss@openoffice.
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 11:33:27 AM +0100, mike scott
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Mike,
nothing written below is intended as an attack or a critique against
you personally, of course. As far as I remember, you weren't around
the last time I raised these issues. Your message, however, seems to
call fo
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 23:24:19 PM -0500, William Case
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Being flustered has turned to being frustrated.
>
> This is the third set of sites I have been told to join before
> anyone will open a discussion on how OOo might be better "sold".
sorry, why does this frustrate y
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 12:39:16 PM -0500, William Case
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> It is frustrating because I diligently went to www.openoffice.org
> and then discuss@openoffice.org, joining the discuss mailing
> list. Now I am being told to go elsewhere. It is exactly the type of
> confusion I wa
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 11:34:45 AM -0600, Robert Derman
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Joseph Hurd wrote:
> >You may want to put a statement somewhere that Open Office can be
> >installed with MS Word on the same computer at the same time.
> > Joseph Hurd
> >
> The only thing that limits being able t
On Thu, December 13, 2007 9:30 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> CAN YOU PLEASE STOP YOUR E-MAIL
Ann,
please do not write all in uppercase, as these guys are doing, at least
on public lists. It is not considered equivalent to shouting, ie not polite,
and several studies proves that makes text harder
DISCLAIMER: the slashdot comment summarized and linked below is an
answer to an unrelated article of mine which just made Slashdot front
page. That's why I saw it, I'm scanning all the comments because I
kind of need to, this time.
You're obviously welcome to read my article too, but as far as thi
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 19:46:46 PM -0500, Twayne ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> New OOo user with some past experience several years ago.
welcome!
> First time visitor here, checking to see if 1. my posts will make it,
> and 2., to ask a question:
>
> I am subbed to this group and the '... .questi
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 13:32:53 PM +1100, Dave Barton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Having been subscribed to this list almost from it's inception, I have
> seen this this argument/issue raised ad-nauseam, so I have avoided
> buying into the recent exchanges. Now I would like to put forward a
> propo
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 17:49:42 PM +, jonathon wrote:
(four times)
> Styles are not being correctly used.
since this, even outside of this thread, is one of the most frequent
issues, then maybe OOo/ODF styles are very poorly advertised and
documented, but this is a side topic.
The OP clearly s
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 09:13:41 AM +1300, Graham Lauder wrote:
> As Jonathon noted, training in the use of Stylist would probably
> have sorted the issue.
I had asked explicitly:
> > M. Fioretti wrote:
> > > maybe this is not really a case where OOo/ODF styles aren't
>
On Mon, February 25, 2008 7:51 am, jonathon wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 11:14 PM, M. Fioretti wrote:
>
>> - being sent to MS Office users who edit it as they please
>
> If the users did use styles with MSO, those styles would be available
> in ODF, albeit with a differ
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 12:47:29 PM -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
>> I see that the next step in the evolution of this product - the
>> office suite, is to remove the "limited multifunction's" approach
>> and to step into a universal full functionality approach.
>
> That's the Windows approach. Windo
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 08:23:04 AM +0100, Ben Dare wrote:
> I'm finding this whole idea very interesting. One concern, not all
> of us run slick, up-to-date, computers; would this integrated
> approach vastly increase the memory/processor use?
excellent question, both because software pollutes
(htt
"Novell-developer Michael Meeks finds strong words for Sun's
management of the free office suite in an interview - Pushes for own
OOo flavor"
http://derstandard.at/?url=/?id=1216917892794
--
Your own civil rights and the quality of your life heavily depend on how
software is used *around* you:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 10:43:20 AM -0500, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> Well I read the interview and seems that Michael didn't said
> anything we didn't really already know.
that is true, but it's interesting to see certain things covered
outside the usual circles. One thing I appreciated is that th
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 11:20:12 AM -0500, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>>> This remind me of the conference call we had with management at
>>> Sun and could personally confirm many fears from Sun on topics of
>>> ownership and managing criteria.
>> Interesting. Would it be possible to know more about t
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 11:54:27 AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, M. Fioretti wrote:
>> "Novell-developer Michael Meeks finds strong words for Sun's
>> management of the free office suite in an interview - Pushes for
>> own OOo flavor"
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 00:43:12 AM -0500, Louis Suarez-Potts wrote:
thanks for the interesting report, but...
> OOo has a brilliant future, all the more so given the dark economic
> times closing around us. But its brilliance depends on the concerted
> efforts on those users who become producers.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 10:41:45 AM +, Ian Lynch wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 21:42 -0500, Louis Suarez-Potts wrote:
> > On 2008-11-10, at 08:48 , Ian Lynch wrote:
> >
> > > Go back a stage and I'd agree. You need strategies to enable
> > > users to become producers and education is the key.
>
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 10:55:15 AM -0600, Mike W. wrote:
> I have a hybrid network with OOo on several workstations and
> Microsoft on several. I am migrating to OOo from MS gradually. All
> of the stored documents are in MS format and some are password
> protected. When opened in MS the user is pro
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 07:52:41 AM +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
> Hi friends,
>
> There are only few messages that pass moderation on this list. Is
> that a selection out of a huge amount? If not, might it be possible
> to dump messages speaking in f*ing and b*it words about our program,
> obviously post
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 08:36:35 AM +0100, Marco Fioretti wrote:
> I opened this message because I thought it was about the much bigger
> problems this list has always had:
Er, sorry. I don't know about Cour, but me, I answered thinking of the
us...@ooo list, where the problem I mentioned has always
Greetings,
the 2009 edition of my seminar on
"How file formats can be used to favor (or hamper) innovation:
concrete impacts on free markets, business competition, culture,
equal opportunities, education..."
which contains several pages discussing OpenDocument, OOo's default
file for
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 13:14:59 PM +0100, Ron wrote:
> I use and prefer Openoffice.Org . Its an excellent program.
>
> However my correspondents use only MS Word and the command open
> with, does not work. How do we get around this problem ???
Ron,
the problem you have encountered is that OpenOffi
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 14:55:43 PM +0200, Ian Samson wrote:
> I never have this problem.
Ian,
Ron explicitly said that it is not him but his correspondents, who use
MS Word, who have the problem.
> experienced thus far. I don't right-click and select the "Open With"
> command. Just double-click wo
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 13:22:25 PM -0400, Twayne wrote:
> Right. When sending documents, if the recipient's capabilities are
> known, the sender should try to accomodate.
Why propagate a virus? Because that is what sending out files in
proprietary formats amounts to. Of course, there are a lot of
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 16:31:55 PM -0400, Twayne wrote:
> Off base: Recommendation was, The Sender doing the accomodating is
> exactly the opposite: Sending files in formats the other end CAN
> read.
I had understood that very clearly, thank you. And I confirm that this
is a bad habit, in this case
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 15:28:26 PM -0400, Twayne wrote:
> X-No-Archive: Yes
Twayne,
was it you that introduced this No-Archive header? If so, it doesn't work:
http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=discuss&msgNo=64448
Back to your comments, starting from here:
> I believe in netiquette
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 21:00:51 PM -0400, Twayne wrote:
> OK, one more time:
>
> M. Fioretti wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 15:28:26 PM -0400, Twayne wrote:
> >> X-No-Archive: Yes
> >
> > Twayne,
> >
> > was it you that introduced this No-Arch
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 18:10:17 PM -0700, NoOp wrote:
> On 04/12/2009 10:40 PM, M. Fioretti wrote:
> >
> > My understanding, since you are "seeing" this forum as an NNTP
> > newsgroup, was that you are adding that header as a request to the
> > NNTP serve
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 08:37:40 AM +0100, Gordon wrote:
> To return to the discussion of the Sun ODF plugin for MS Office that
> won't work on Office 97
Just to avoid confusion: I am the one who originally mentioned the
plugin incompatibility with Office 97 first, but I'm not the one whose
correspo
On Sun, May 10, 2009 14:58:09 PM -0400, Douglas St.Clair wrote:
> Has Microsoft failed to properly implement the standard or has it
> 'extended' it?
This has been discussed quite in depth just a few days ago in the
users list. I suggest that everybody interested browses this thread:
http://www.
n, or install some good anti-spam system.
Best Regards,
M. Fioretti
Digital Rights writings -> http://mfioretti.com
--
Your own civil rights and the quality of your life heavily depend on how
software is used *around* you
On Tue, May 19, 2009 12:11:02 PM +0200, Kristofer Åberg wrote:
> Yahoogroups also have a lot of open discussion lists, but they
> remove the e-mail address... You really should do the same
"You" who, please? I and everybody else who answered you so far *are*
volunteers without any official connec
On Tue, May 19, 2009 13:54:50 PM +0200, Kristofer Åberg wrote:
> To M. Fioretti:
>
> I think it is very unnecessary to be this defensive and aggressive.
> ...
> So you mean no official people or developers read this list?
Kristofer,
the main link to this list in OpenOffice
Sorry, I made a mistake:
On Tue, May 19, 2009 16:38:20 PM +0200, Marco Fioretti wrote:
> the list definition in the same page explicitly says "OpenOffice.org
> Project community support provided by a network of hundreds of
> experienced users"
This is the definition of the Users list, not the D
of spambots reach, it's absolutely useless. I say this not
against Kristofer, but as a general reference for everybody.
Earlier today, Kristofer had replied to me as follows:
>> M. Fioretti wrote:
>> - the pages are mirrored by many other independent websites, which
>> you sho
receiving too much spam, you should
either stop using that address and be more careful with a new one from
now on, or install some good anti-spam system.
Best Regards,
M. Fioretti
Digital Rights writings -> http://mfioretti.com
--
Your own civil rights and
On Tue, May 19, 2009 19:05:10 PM +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote:
> No, but nobody maintaining the mailing list web frontend does. This
> is done at Collab.Net, the web hoster for OOo. AFAIK this question
> has been discussed with them, but to no avail.
Hoping to get answers about anything regarding
On Tue, May 19, 2009 16:07:30 PM -0400, Drew Jensen wrote:
> I believe email addresses displayed 'in the clear' or obfuscated, by
> gmane at least, is a setting that can be changed and requires only
> that someone contact the archive manager.
they can encrypt addresses as explained at http://gman
On Wed, December 2, 2009 10:40 pm, Javier Bustamante wrote:
> It looks like this site is trying to sell your software for $9.99
>
> http://www.openoffice2007.com/index.html
Javier,
towards the end of that page there is a statement that says that it is
fully legal for them to charge for OpenOffic
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 07:55:51 AM +, Mike Scott wrote:
> There is another possibility to deal with the situation. I suggested
> on 'users' a while ago (meeting with an unexpected lack of
> enthusiasm) that an auto-responder might be constructed
You were lucky. As far as I know, I was the first
On Thu, January 7, 2010 3:36 pm, Barbara Duprey wrote:
> The OP (sparta...@yahoo.com) is not subscribed and probably did not see
> this response.
To deal with this problem and all its future occurrences in the future,
here and on the users list, please just follow the suggestions at
http://www.
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 14:58:57 PM -0600, Barbara Duprey (b...@onr.com) wrote:
> The OOo list management (ezmlm or CollabNet-- I'd love to know who
> does what here) sets a Reply-To header that includes only the list
> address. This precedes the original Reply-To containing whatever the
> sender spe
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 18:47:22 PM -0600, Barbara Duprey (b...@onr.com) wrote:
> M. Fioretti wrote:
> >... Why waste any more time over this investigation?
>
> For one thing, I'm learning a lot -- and collecting it in a form
> that should be useful to others. I don'
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 10:21:43 AM -0600, Barbara Duprey (b...@onr.com) wrote:
> Marco wrote:
> > now, will you please understand that there is no guarantee
> > whatsoever that when all the other subscribed users will open their
> > mailbox they will find BOTH X and Y in it?
> > ...
> I *do
(Barbara, I'm sending you this message twice for reasons explained at
the end, only to make my explanation clearer)
OK, as I said, let's restart from this message of yours. First of all,
I have remembered why my idea of what YOU (Barbara) are trying to do
was different from what you described toda
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 18:01:16 PM +, Harold Fuchs
(fuchs.har...@googlemail.com) wrote:
> In the past I have "forwarding to unsubscribed user" but have been
> slated for doing so.
And every time you, and others doing the same before you, were given
tons of patiently explained reasons why it wa
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 15:08:28 PM -0500, Wm Stewart
(wstew...@livinginternet.com) wrote:
> It saddens me greatly to see OpenOffice friends who claim to be
> "open" minded show a "closed" mind on interoperability, blocking the
> complete success that is so near at hand, and we all wish.
>
> (Pleas
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 17:58:07 PM +1000, Bob Long (b...@oblong.com.au) wrote:
> Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
> >Well, now much helpful, but all I can say is just avoid to use the
> >Microsoft formats as far as possible. Since Microsoft's file formats
> >(except those OOXML things) are not open formats
C
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 09:38:49 AM -0800, NoOp (gl...@sbcglobal.net) wrote:
> On 02/02/2010 09:43 AM, kwalsh2004 wrote:
> > Hello -
> >
> ...
> Note to all those in this thread that didn't cc Kim Walsh
> (kwalsh2...@gmail.com) in their reply, please note that he/she will not
> have received your res
Here it is, while all the ODF hackers around me here in Granada are still
hacking, comparing code, discussing bugs and so on:
http://freesoftware.zona-m.net/node/10
(a link to the talk I gave yesterday about hidden proprietary traps that
may enter ODF is also included)
You're obviously welcome t
Greetings,
I just interviewed Tony, who's starting an audio documentation project
for blind computer users willing to switch to Linux and Free Software:
http://stop.zona-m.net/node/150
the question for this list is: do audio tutorials like those Tony is
asking for already exist for OOo, even on
On Tue, May 04, 2010 07:51:10 AM -0400, Andrew Jensen
(drewjensen.in...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 7:42 AM, M. Fioretti wrote:
>
> I just interviewed Tony, who's starting an audio documentation
> project for blind computer users willing to switch to Linux
Greetings,
here is the introduction to a series of quick and dirty recipes I'll
publish on my "tips &tricks" website:
http://freesoftware.zona-m.net/why-and-how-opendocument-format-can-save-you-lot-time
If there's any specific trick you'd like to see explained in that
series, just ask and I'll d
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 12:14:59 PM -0800, hans nobody (hans01...@yahoo.de) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> At work (where we unfortunately have to use MS Office), I have often
> the need to create a presentation or text-document made up by a
> couple of fotos with comments, to explain or document mechanical
>
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 10:03:17 AM +0100, Mike Scott (m...@scottsonline.org.uk)
wrote:
> >in case you still have that need, you can surely do that kind of
> >stuff with shell and Perl scripts: just look at the "What's next"
> >section of
> >http://freesoftware.zona-m.net/why-and-how-opendocument-fo
Greetings,
here's my initial report from Budapest:
http://freesoftware.zona-m.net/node/23
HTH,
Marco
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: discuss-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: discuss-h...@openoffice.org
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 11:48:10 AM +1300, Paul (paul.m...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I think this commentary is more accurate as to why the video exists:
> http://blogs.computerworlduk.com/open-enterprise/2010/10/microsoft-gives-its-blessing-to-openofficeorg/index.htm?cmpid=sbslashdotschapman
The funny, b
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 08:53:13 AM -0400, Wm Stewart
(wstew...@livinginternet.com) wrote:
> OpenOffice could be the world standard very quickly if it solved
> what users say is the number one barrier to widespread adoption.
> Slides 26 and 30 of this presentation show that the feature OO users
> *th
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 10:02:18 AM -0400, Wm Stewart
(wstew...@livinginternet.com) wrote:
>
> On 10/16/2010 9:36 AM, M. Fioretti wrote:
> >On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 08:53:13 AM -0400, Wm Stewart
> >(wstew...@livinginternet.com) wrote:
> >
> >>OpenOffice could be the
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 13:22:44 PM -0400, Wm Stewart
(wstew...@livinginternet.com) wrote:
>b. Solving compatibility is under the community's control
NO. It isn't. By definition. Because it's not the community that
controls when the secret formats it's trying to catch will stop moving
and changi
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 08:34:31 AM +1000, Dave Barton wrote:
> Robert... You are not a list moderator and have no authority to
> appoint yourself as "the list police". Maybe you are aware of the
> mailing list recommendation, not to fill the archives with worthless
> exchanges such as this. Therefo
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 11:57:53 AM +1000, Dave Barton wrote:
> My long history with this and other OOo lists proves that I do not
> make it a practice to engage in these kind of exchanges.
then, please, don't get them started at all with public answers to
guidelines reminders that sound like "yes,
201 - 295 of 295 matches
Mail list logo
