[discuss] Re: [project leads] Re: [discuss] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Becoming an (Incubator) Project

2008-10-08 Thread Kay Ramme
Hi Martin, Martin Hollmichel wrote: all, Let me do some additional comments regarding our current project setup since this is a project which not necessarily has to do with OpenOffice.org core technology or native lang projects. I tend to disagree here ... but lets see ... Currently the

Re: [discuss] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Becoming an (Incubator) Project

2008-10-08 Thread Ian Lynch
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 11:28 +0200, Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote: Hi Ian, Ian Lynch wrote: On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 17:52 +0200, sophie gautier wrote: This is not the same support, in that case, it's about supporting OOo as a wysiwyg editor for web services, odf being the

Re: [discuss] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Becoming an (Incubator) Project

2008-10-08 Thread Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg
Hi Ian, Ian Lynch wrote: On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 17:52 +0200, sophie gautier wrote: This is not the same support, in that case, it's about supporting OOo as a wysiwyg editor for web services, odf being the native file format of OOo. There are members of the odfellowship who would probably not

Re: [discuss] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Becoming an (Incubator) Project

2008-10-08 Thread Bernd Eilers
Hi there! Michael Adams wrote: [... snip ...] Yeah i am left unclear by the name as to if the intent is to modify the XML of the file formats for the web, extract (parse) data from the existing XML files or to edit ODF files with a different UI. Plus the at @ in a URI is pretty messy %40

Re: [discuss] Re: [project leads] Re: [discuss] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Becoming an (Incubator) Project

2008-10-08 Thread Juergen Schmidt
Hi, not that i am not interested or that the idea isn't interesting generally but can you please continue the discussion on one mailing list only. Or better on an appropriate mailing list for the new incubator project. Thanks Juergen Kay Ramme wrote: Hi Martin, Martin Hollmichel wrote:

Re: [discuss] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Becoming an (Incubator) Project

2008-10-07 Thread Ian Lynch
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 17:52 +0200, sophie gautier wrote: This is not the same support, in that case, it's about supporting OOo as a wysiwyg editor for web services, odf being the native file format of OOo. There are members of the odfellowship who would probably not ever become members

Re: [discuss] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Becoming an (Incubator) Project

2008-10-07 Thread Michael Adams
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 08:55:32 +0100 Came this utterance fomulated by Ian Lynch to my mailbox: On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 17:52 +0200, sophie gautier wrote: This is not the same support, in that case, it's about supporting OOo as a wysiwyg editor for web services, odf being the native file

Re: [discuss] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Becoming an (Incubator) Project

2008-10-06 Thread sophie gautier
Hi Ian, Ian Lynch wrote: On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 15:53 +0200, Martin Hollmichel wrote: all, Let me do some additional comments regarding our current project setup since this is a project which not necessarily has to do with OpenOffice.org core technology or native lang projects. Currently

Re: [discuss] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Becoming an (Incubator) Project

2008-10-05 Thread Martin Hollmichel
all, Let me do some additional comments regarding our current project setup since this is a project which not necessarily has to do with OpenOffice.org core technology or native lang projects. Currently the Incubator category has been set up to provide some space to test new ideas (see:

Re: [discuss] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Becoming an (Incubator) Project

2008-10-05 Thread Ian Lynch
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 15:53 +0200, Martin Hollmichel wrote: all, Let me do some additional comments regarding our current project setup since this is a project which not necessarily has to do with OpenOffice.org core technology or native lang projects. Currently the Incubator category

[discuss] Re: [dev] Re: [project leads] Re: [discuss] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Becoming an (Incubator) Project

2008-10-05 Thread Martin Hollmichel
eric b wrote: Hi Martin, Le 5 oct. 08 à 15:53, Martin Hollmichel a écrit : Reading : I think we need to revisit these guidelines and may invent a new category like OOo related projects. and Candidates for this project might be the [EMAIL PROTECTED] but also the Extensions or the

Re: [discuss] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Becoming an (Incubator) Project

2008-09-29 Thread Datatude
On 09-26-2008 6:19 AM, Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote: To get your interest and hopefully your support, I would like to give the motivation: The [EMAIL PROTECTED] project aims to develop companion products for ODF and OpenOffice.org to extend their reach into the WWW. The first

Re: [discuss] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Becoming an (Incubator) Project

2008-09-29 Thread acolorado
This idea was also applied on the project lead lists and was also approved. There is a published procedure to get overal approval of an incubator project. On 9/29/08, Datatude [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 09-26-2008 6:19 AM, Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote: To get your interest and

Re: [discuss] email client

2008-06-12 Thread Jeffrey Tooker
Kent Hervey wrote: I want to copy over my pst files from another computer and stop using Outlook. Is there a way? Is there a client. Of course, people will continue to send me meeting invitations via their Outlook. Will they work? Kent: I have the same problem. I was told to export my

Re: [discuss] Email client

2007-10-03 Thread Paul
Are you currently working on an email client? That would be the big thing to getting me completely switched over. There are plenty of good email clients out there that are open source - give them a go and see if they meet your needs. The one most recommended is Thunderbird -

Re: [discuss] Email client

2007-09-03 Thread Johnny Rosenberg
I use Evolution. Seems to do the job and I think it looks like Outlook (some people say it does, but I never had Outlook so I don't know for sure). By the way, this is a question that is asked almost every day on this list. Strange. J.R. 2007/9/3, Alexandro Colorado [EMAIL PROTECTED]: There

Re: [discuss] Email client

2007-08-07 Thread Michael Adams
Replies inline. On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 00:36:37 +0200 M. Maas wrote: Dear Sir/Madam, I am not certain as to whether or not this idea has been uttered, or if something like this actually exists in your software already. I have, however, never been able to find anything likei t in

Re: [discuss] Email client

2007-08-03 Thread Robin Laing
M. Maas wrote: Dear Sir/Madam, I am not certain as to whether or not this idea has been uttered, or if something like this actually exists in your software already. I have, however, never been able to find anything likei t in OpenOffice or indpendant email clients, so I thought I’d give

Re: [discuss] Email client

2007-08-03 Thread Robert Derman
Robin Laing wrote: M. Maas wrote: Dear Sir/Madam, I am not certain as to whether or not this idea has been uttered, or if something like this actually exists in your software already. I have, however, never been able to find anything likei t in OpenOffice or indpendant email clients, so I

Re: [discuss] Email client

2007-08-02 Thread Robert Derman
M. Maas wrote: Dear Sir/Madam, I am not certain as to whether or not this idea has been uttered, or if something like this actually exists in your software already. I have, however, never been able to find anything likei t in OpenOffice or indpendant email clients, so I thought I’d give

Re: [discuss] Email Tool

2006-04-25 Thread Alan Frayer
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 02:31, Alexandro Colorado wrote: To start on Linux we already have mature PIM apps such as Kontact and Evolution which are superior since you have a broader option of backends (Outlook you are tight to Exchange). While Evolution, you will have about 5 options for

Re: [discuss] Email Tool

2006-04-25 Thread Alexandro Colorado
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 07:23:52 -0400, Alan Frayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 02:31, Alexandro Colorado wrote: To start on Linux we already have mature PIM apps such as Kontact and Evolution which are superior since you have a broader option of backends (Outlook you are

Re: [discuss] Email Tool

2006-04-23 Thread Cor Nouws
Alexandro Colorado wrote: On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 19:50:30 -0400, Larry Gusaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Questions: 1. What are the FLOSS equivalents of Outlook? Evolution port, kde-pim, Zimbra, and many that I mention before including web-based pim that you can either run from a remote

Re: [discuss] Email Tool

2006-04-18 Thread Alexandro Colorado
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 19:50:30 -0400, Larry Gusaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Questions: 1. What are the FLOSS equivalents of Outlook? Evolution port, kde-pim, Zimbra, and many that I mention before including web-based pim that you can either run from a remote server or from within your

Re: [discuss] Email Tool

2006-04-18 Thread Ian Lynch
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 02:31 -0400, Alexandro Colorado wrote: On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 19:50:30 -0400, Larry Gusaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Questions: 1. What are the FLOSS equivalents of Outlook? Evolution port, kde-pim, Zimbra, and many that I mention before including web-based pim

Re: [discuss] Email Tool

2006-04-18 Thread Michael Adams
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 09:15:37 -0700 Andrew Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: there is no need as http://mozilla.org has Thunderbird for email and Sunbird for Calendaring. Sunbird may not be complete yet but is getting closer all of the time. Sorry, I have to COMPLETELY disagree with you.

Re: [discuss] Email Tool

2006-04-18 Thread Alexandro Colorado
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 04:06:51 -0400, Michael Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, I have to COMPLETELY disagree with you. Thunderbird with the Calendar or Lightning add-in and Sunbird are excellent applications, for the casual home user. They do not even hold a candle to the features and

RE: [discuss] Email Tool

2006-04-17 Thread Andrew Robertson
there is no need as http://mozilla.org has Thunderbird for email and Sunbird for Calendaring. Sunbird may not be complete yet but is getting closer all of the time. Sorry, I have to COMPLETELY disagree with you. Thunderbird with the Calendar or Lightning add-in and Sunbird are excellent

RE: [discuss] Email Tool

2006-04-17 Thread Andrew Robertson
Sorry about the formatting in the last post, here is a cleaned up version there is no need as http://mozilla.org has Thunderbird for email and Sunbird for Calendaring. Sunbird may not be complete yet but is getting closer all of the time. Sorry, I have to COMPLETELY disagree with

Re: [discuss] Email Tool

2006-04-17 Thread Alexandro Colorado
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:15:37 -0400, Andrew Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, I have to COMPLETELY disagree with you. Thunderbird with the Calendar or Lightning add-in and Sunbird are excellent applications, for the casual home user. They do not even hold a candle to the features and

RE: [discuss] Email Tool

2006-04-17 Thread Andrew Robertson
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:15:37 -0400, Andrew Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, I have to COMPLETELY disagree with you. Thunderbird with the Calendar or Lightning add-in and Sunbird are excellent applications, for the casual home user. They do not even hold a candle to the features and

Re: [discuss] Email Tool

2006-04-17 Thread Jonathon Blake
Andrew wrote: Because it appears that a project hasn't been started. a) You do realize that email integration was removed from OOo, don't you? b) You do realize that LAMP + OOo + Thunderbird + Firefox + the FLOSS version of Outlook (which is no longer being developed, because contrary to the

Re: [discuss] Email Tool

2006-04-17 Thread Alexandro Colorado
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 17:37:23 -0400, Jonathon Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: b) You do realize that LAMP + OOo + Thunderbird + Firefox + the FLOSS version of Outlook (which is no longer being developed, because contrary to the claims of the people that say they will switch from Outlook to

Re: [discuss] Email Tool

2006-04-17 Thread Jonathon Blake
Alexandro wrote: What? I didnt get that at all. Can you clear your point. I'll rewrite that. a) There is a FLOSS equivalent to Outlook --- with all of the functions of outlook --- that is no longer being developed, because people were not using it; b) That OOo + several other currently

Re: [discuss] Email Tool

2006-04-15 Thread CPHennessy
On Thu March 30 2006 21:46, + Rana, Rudresh wrote: [ MODERATED ] Hello, OpenOffice has almost all products in its Suite except one. Just the way MS-Outlook is available in MS-Office bundle, would OpenOffice too have something in the near future? Is something

RE: [discuss] Email

2006-04-12 Thread Ian Lynch
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 11:13 +1000, Justin Fitzgibbon wrote: -Original Message- From: Alexandro Colorado [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 12 April 2006 9:57 AM To: discuss@openoffice.org Subject: Re: [discuss] Email On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 17:39:42 -0400, Andrew Robertson

Re: [discuss] Email

2006-04-11 Thread Jan Bassez
ccng schreef: Dear Sir, Why open office do not create the email application, which similar with to Outlook. Can do scheduling, planning, to do list Thanks Chong There is already Thunderbird from Mozilla (http://www.mozilla.com) greetings!

RE: [discuss] Email

2006-04-11 Thread Andrew Robertson
Bodycare Export Manager Ph. 805-582-2710 xt. 244 Fx. 805-582-2730 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.dermae.net -Original Message- From: Jan Bassez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 6:13 AM To: discuss@openoffice.org Subject: Re: [discuss] Email ccng schreef: Dear Sir, Why open

Re: [discuss] Email

2006-04-11 Thread Alexandro Colorado
Export Manager Ph. 805-582-2710 xt. 244 Fx. 805-582-2730 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.dermae.net -Original Message- From: Jan Bassez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 6:13 AM To: discuss@openoffice.org Subject: Re: [discuss] Email ccng schreef: Dear Sir, Why open office do

RE: [discuss] Email

2006-04-11 Thread Andrew Robertson
-Original Message- From: Alexandro Colorado [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 6:39 AM To: discuss@openoffice.org Subject: Re: [discuss] Email On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 10:21:15 -0400, Andrew Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm surprised that OpenOffice/Sun

Re: [discuss] Email

2006-04-11 Thread Alexandro Colorado
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 10:55:59 -0400, Andrew Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: Alexandro Colorado [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 6:39 AM To: discuss@openoffice.org Subject: Re: [discuss] Email On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 10:21:15 -0400, Andrew

Re: [discuss] Email

2006-04-11 Thread Jozef Peterka
Alexandro Colorado wrote: On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 10:55:59 -0400, Andrew Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: Alexandro Colorado [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 6:39 AM To: discuss@openoffice.org Subject: Re: [discuss] Email On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 10

Re: [discuss] Email

2006-04-11 Thread Cor Nouws
Andrew Robertson wrote: -Original Message- From: Alexandro Colorado [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenOffice.org is an office/productivity suite and Outlook is a communication bundle. To do a project like this will be a big deviation of resources. Just because MSO package a PIM under

Re: [discuss] Email

2006-04-11 Thread Alexandro Colorado
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 16:09:07 -0400, Jozef Peterka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I fully agree. I have subscribed this malinglist only to complain that there is no PIM in OOo . . . such a shame :( really important to make a good PIM/mailing program part of OOo to make it used widely. Please, do

RE: [discuss] Email

2006-04-11 Thread Andrew Robertson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.dermae.net -Original Message- From: Alexandro Colorado [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 12:30 PM To: discuss@openoffice.org Subject: Re: [discuss] Email On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 16:09:07 -0400, Jozef Peterka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I fully agree

Re: [discuss] Email

2006-04-11 Thread Alexandro Colorado
. 805-582-2730 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.dermae.net -Original Message- From: Alexandro Colorado [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 12:30 PM To: discuss@openoffice.org Subject: Re: [discuss] Email On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 16:09:07 -0400, Jozef Peterka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

RE: [discuss] Email

2006-04-11 Thread Justin Fitzgibbon
-Original Message- From: Alexandro Colorado [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 12 April 2006 9:57 AM To: discuss@openoffice.org Subject: Re: [discuss] Email On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 17:39:42 -0400, Andrew Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 55,000 euros is $66,600 US dollars...hehe

Re: [discuss] Email Tool

2006-03-30 Thread Alexandro Colorado
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 14:46:58 -0600, Rana, Rudresh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, OpenOffice has almost all products in its Suite except one. Just the way MS-Outlook is available in MS-Office bundle, would OpenOffice too have something in the near future? Is something similar already in

Re: [discuss] Email

2006-02-08 Thread Chris
I up for that, Shame I have no programming skill.. Is there a web site or forum to get a look at the project, Suggest some features etc.. Regards Chris Cichocki On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 21:30:35 -, Daniel Kasak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: C Cichocki wrote: Would be wouldn't it, why not

Re: [discuss] Email

2006-02-07 Thread C Cichocki
Paul wrote: I don't believe there is no intention of including an email client (although being a much asked for addition). There are plenty available (open source that is) which can fill the gap if required. /paul On 2/7/06, C Cichocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Vindie wrote: Will the

Re: [discuss] Email

2006-02-07 Thread Lars D . Noodén
You might want to look at any of these to supplement OOo: Eudora (not OSS, but the best client on the market for many years) http://eudora.com/ Thunderbird (OSS and giving Eudora a real run for the money) http://www.mozilla.com/thunderbird/ Seamonkey (Mozilla's new

Re: [discuss] Email

2006-02-07 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le Mar 7 février 2006 10:10, C Cichocki a écrit : Correct me if I am wrong but I have not yet found and open source E-mail client that offer anywhere near the same level of functionality. Then you should understand why creating yet another incomplete MUA is more stupid than trying to complete

Re: [discuss] Email

2006-02-07 Thread C Cichocki
Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le Mar 7 février 2006 10:10, C Cichocki a écrit : Correct me if I am wrong but I have not yet found and open source E-mail client that offer anywhere near the same level of functionality. Then you should understand why creating yet another incomplete MUA is

Re: [discuss] Email

2006-02-07 Thread Daniel Kasak
C Cichocki wrote: Would be wouldn't it, why not create a complete one then?? That's what Evolution is aiming to do. Anyone in the open-source world thinking of working on an Outlook look-alike for Outlook users will work on Evolution. -- Daniel Kasak IT Developer NUS Consulting Group Level

Re: [discuss] Email

2006-02-07 Thread Alexandro
This is the project if you are a developer or can hire one, you might want to check it out here. http://evolution-win32.sourceforge.net/ Since the project just start and evolution is such a big app I think they will need as many developers and they can. On 2/7/06, Daniel Kasak [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [discuss] Email

2006-02-06 Thread Paul
I don't believe there is no intention of including an email client (although being a much asked for addition). There are plenty available (open source that is) which can fill the gap if required. /paul On 2/7/06, C Cichocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Vindie wrote: Will the next stable

Re: [discuss] Email Calendar

2005-12-13 Thread CPHennessy
On Mon December 12 2005 21:28, + Jeremiah Wiser wrote: Any plans for Calendar and Email programs? No. However have a look at Thunderbird and Sunbird from http://mozilla.org Please reply to discuss@openoffice.org only. Normally users@openoffice.org is the best list to ask questions about using

Re: [discuss] Email vital for Desktop Linux adoption, prime role available for OOo

2005-12-06 Thread Daniel Kasak
Chad Smith wrote: It mentions Evolution as the top contender, and Lightning (a planned combination of Thunderbird and Sunbird - the Mozilla email client and calendar respectively) as a distant second. A OOo-based email client/PIM could fill his void. What do you all think? After the last

Re: [discuss] Email database phonebook

2005-11-09 Thread Paul
Its a good thought, but are you suggesting this should be in OpenOffice?? There are web sites out there that offer similar functionality. Google for them and have a go. /paul On 11/10/05, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have an idea that I think users would find very useful. An Email

Re: [discuss] Email Client

2005-04-26 Thread Avraham Hanadari
I'm using OO 1995 on XP. In the File tab there is an option Send and the drop down contains several options. Two of them are: Document as e-mail and Document as PDF attachment ... Both these optionss open the default e-mail client (mine is Thunderbird) and place the selected file as an

Re: [discuss] Email Client

2005-04-21 Thread Peter Kupfer OOo
Mike Finley wrote: fees and upgrade costs and items like that. What I have noticed with the Microsoft Office suite that annoys me is I prefer to use Mozilla Thunderbird as my email client, yet when I select that as my Email client under Internet Explorers Tools = Internet Options = Programs

Re: [discuss] Email Client

2005-04-19 Thread Steve Kopischke
Mike: Have you tried taking your problem to the MozillaZine Thunderbird Support forum @ http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewforum.php?f=39 ? I'm pretty sure the solution might be fairly quick and easy. oldgnome Mike Finley said the following on : To All, I am an avid user of the Open Office,

Re: [discuss] Email Client

2005-04-19 Thread Sweet Coffee
Hi Mike and Steve! Mike, please post if you get a solution at the Mozilla forum. SC On 4/19/05, Steve Kopischke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike: Have you tried taking your problem to the MozillaZine Thunderbird Support forum @ http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewforum.php?f=39 ? I'm pretty