[E-devel] edbus

Hello, could someone with knowledge please take a look at method_close() in src/bin/edbus/parser.c It seems like the method->cb_name = strdup("NULL"); before free(method); leaks memory. I know too little about where/how the global var method is being used to decide here. Regards, Daniel -

Re: [E-devel] edbus

Hi Daniel I don't see any leaks. method->cb_name = strdup("NULL"); is because the method have no reply annotation and this is only know after "" The DBus_Method and all strings of they will be freed when object_free()->inteface_free()->method_free() is called. On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Da

Re: [E-devel] edbus

On 18/02/13 14:35, Jose Souza wrote: > Hi Daniel > > I don't see any leaks. > method->cb_name = strdup("NULL"); is because the method have no reply > annotation and this is only know after "" > The DBus_Method and all strings of they will be freed when > object_free()->inteface_free()->method_free

Re: [E-devel] edbus

In method_new() the method is append to inlist of methods in interface. On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Daniel Willmann wrote: > On 18/02/13 14:35, Jose Souza wrote: > > Hi Daniel > > > > I don't see any leaks. > > method->cb_name = strdup("NULL"); is because the method have no reply > > annotat

[E-devel] edbus build issue.

While I'm bitching ... CC src/lib/edbus_signal_handler.lo src/lib/edbus_message.c: In function ‘append_basic’: src/lib/edbus_message.c:377: error: ‘DBUS_TYPE_UNIX_FD’ undeclared (first use in this function) src/lib/edbus_message.c:377: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only

[E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

Hey guys, How are you? I just noticed that 'edbus' installs headers under: prefix/include/edbus-1 while using the pkgconfig name 'edbus2' the library name 'libedbus2' and an header called 'EDbus.h'. Luckily for us, it's not too late to fix it. Only question, what should we change it to? Everywhe

Re: [E-devel] edbus build issue.

this is defined in dbus-protocol.h from libdbus. not sure why we're using it if edbus was the attempt to get away from using libdbus, but hey, I didn't write it On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 7:18 AM, David Seikel wrote: > While I'm bitching ... > > CC src/lib/edbus_signal_handler.lo > src/lib/edb

Re: [E-devel] edbus build issue.

On 10/09/2012 03:18 PM, David Seikel wrote: > While I'm bitching ... > >CC src/lib/edbus_signal_handler.lo > src/lib/edbus_message.c: In function 'append_basic': > src/lib/edbus_message.c:377: error: 'DBUS_TYPE_UNIX_FD' undeclared >(first use in this function) src/lib/edbus_message.c:37

Re: [E-devel] edbus build issue.

On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 15:37:35 +0900 "daniel.za...@samsung.com" wrote: > On 10/09/2012 03:18 PM, David Seikel wrote: > > While I'm bitching ... > > > >CC src/lib/edbus_signal_handler.lo > > src/lib/edbus_message.c: In function 'append_basic': > > src/lib/edbus_message.c:377: error: 'DBUS_TY

Re: [E-devel] edbus build issue.

On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 07:37:05 +0100 Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: > this is defined in dbus-protocol.h from libdbus. not sure why we're > using it if edbus was the attempt to get away from using libdbus, but > hey, I didn't write it Confirmed, DBUS_TYPE_UNIX_FD is not in the 1.2.16-2 version of libd

Re: [E-devel] edbus build issue.

englebass already fixed it. http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/77629 On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 4:03 AM, David Seikel wrote: > On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 07:37:05 +0100 Michael Blumenkrantz > wrote: > >> this is defined in dbus-protocol.h from libdbus. not sure why we're >> using it if edbus was the

Re: [E-devel] edbus build issue.

On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:37 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: > this is defined in dbus-protocol.h from libdbus. not sure why we're using > it if edbus was the attempt to get away from using libdbus, but hey, I > didn't write it Because writing it entirely from scratch talking directly to the socke

Re: [E-devel] edbus build issue.

On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Jose Souza wrote: > englebass already fixed it. > > http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/77629 I guess it would be better to have a compat header defining the values not present in older versions of libdbus. If dbus daemon doesn't support them, it should just

Re: [E-devel] edbus build issue.

you so crazy! On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Lucas De Marchi < lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:37 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz > wrote: > > this is defined in dbus-protocol.h from libdbus. not sure why we're using > > it if edbus was the attempt to get away from usi

Re: [E-devel] edbus build issue.

On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 10:12:19 -0300 Jose Souza wrote: > englebass already fixed it. > > http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/77629 > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 4:03 AM, David Seikel > wrote: > > On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 07:37:05 +0100 Michael Blumenkrantz > > wrote: > > > >> this is defined in dbu

Re: [E-devel] edbus build issue.

On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:39 AM, David Seikel wrote: > On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 10:12:19 -0300 Jose Souza > wrote: > >> englebass already fixed it. >> >> http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/77629 >> >> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 4:03 AM, David Seikel >> wrote: >> > On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 07:37:05 +0100

Re: [E-devel] edbus build issue.

On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:39 AM, David Seikel wrote: > On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 10:12:19 -0300 Jose Souza > wrote: > >> englebass already fixed it. >> >> http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/77629 >> >> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 4:03 AM, David Seikel >> wrote: >> > On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 07:37:05 +0100

Re: [E-devel] edbus build issue.

Den 9. okt. 2012 kl. 17:03 skrev Lucas De Marchi : > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:39 AM, David Seikel wrote: >> On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 10:12:19 -0300 Jose Souza >> wrote: >> >>> englebass already fixed it. >>> >>> http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/77629 >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 4:03 A

[E-devel] edbus(2) feature request

any chance the notification stuff can be ported over? I was going to move shotgun to using edbus2 but I can't until this is implemented... -- Keep yourself connected to Go Parallel: INSIGHTS What's next for parallel har

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > Hey guys, > > How are you? I just noticed that 'edbus' installs headers under: > prefix/include/edbus-1 > while using the pkgconfig name 'edbus2' > the library name 'libedbus2' > and an header called 'EDbus.h'. > > Luckily for us, it's not too

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

On 16/04/13 15:26, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote: >> Hey guys, >> >> How are you? I just noticed that 'edbus' installs headers under: >> prefix/include/edbus-1 >> while using the pkgconfig name 'edbus2' >> the library name 'libedbus2' >> and an header

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > On 16/04/13 15:26, Lucas De Marchi wrote: >> >> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Tom Hacohen >> wrote: >>> >>> Hey guys, >>> >>> How are you? I just noticed that 'edbus' installs headers under: >>> prefix/include/edbus-1 >>> while using the

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

On 16/04/13 16:01, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote: >> On 16/04/13 15:26, Lucas De Marchi wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Tom Hacohen >>> wrote: Hey guys, How are you? I just noticed that 'edbus' installs headers un

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

Tom Hacohen wrote: >On 16/04/13 16:01, Lucas De Marchi wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Tom Hacohen > wrote: >>> On 16/04/13 15:26, Lucas De Marchi wrote: On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Tom Hacohen > wrote: > > Hey guys, > > How are you? I just noticed

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:13 PM, wrote: > Tom Hacohen wrote: >> >> On 16/04/13 16:01, Lucas De Marchi wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Tom Hacohen >>> wrote: On 16/04/13 15:26, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Tom Hacohen > wrote

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:24:08 -0300 Lucas De Marchi said: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:13 PM, wrote: > > Tom Hacohen wrote: > >> > >> On 16/04/13 16:01, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > >>> > >>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Tom Hacohen > >>> wrote: > > On 16/04/13 15:26, Lucas De Marchi

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:24:08 -0300 Lucas De Marchi > said: > >> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:13 PM, wrote: >> > Tom Hacohen wrote: >> >> >> >> On 16/04/13 16:01, Lucas De Marchi wrote: >> >>> >> >>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Tom H

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 20:57:33 -0300 Lucas De Marchi wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:24:08 -0300 Lucas De Marchi > > said: > > > >> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:13 PM, > >> wrote: > >> > Tom Hacohen wrote: > >> >> > >> >> On 16/04/13

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 20:57:33 -0300 Lucas De Marchi said: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:24:08 -0300 Lucas De Marchi > > said: > > > >> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:13 PM, wrote: > >> > Tom Hacohen wrote: > >> >> > >> >> On 16/04/13 16:01,

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 20:57:33 -0300 Lucas De Marchi > said: > >> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Carsten Haitzler >> wrote: >> > On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:24:08 -0300 Lucas De Marchi >> > said: >> > >> >> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:13 PM,

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

On 04/17/13 10:11, David Seikel wrote: > On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 20:57:33 -0300 Lucas De Marchi > wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Carsten Haitzler > > wrote: > > > On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:24:08 -0300 Lucas De Marchi > > > said: > > > > > >> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:13 PM, > > >> wro

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 01:18:50 + Iván Briano said: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 20:57:33 -0300 Lucas De Marchi > > said: > > > >> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Carsten Haitzler > >> wrote: > >> > On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:24:08 -0300 L

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 11:29:28 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 01:18:50 + Iván Briano > said: > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Carsten Haitzler > > wrote: > > > On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 20:57:33 -0300 Lucas De Marchi > > > said: > > > > > >> On Tue, Apr

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

On 17/04/13 02:28, Jérôme Pinot wrote: > On 04/17/13 10:11, David Seikel wrote: >> On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 20:57:33 -0300 Lucas De Marchi >> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Carsten Haitzler >>> wrote: On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:24:08 -0300 Lucas De Marchi said: > On Tue

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

Cedric Bail On Apr 17, 2013 2:22 AM, "Tom Hacohen" wrote: > > On 17/04/13 02:28, Jérôme Pinot wrote: > > On 04/17/13 10:11, David Seikel wrote: > >> On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 20:57:33 -0300 Lucas De Marchi > >> wrote: > >> > >>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Carsten Haitzler > >>> wrote: > On

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote: > Cedric Bail > On Apr 17, 2013 2:22 AM, "Tom Hacohen" wrote: >> >> On 17/04/13 02:28, Jérôme Pinot wrote: >> > On 04/17/13 10:11, David Seikel wrote: >> >> On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 20:57:33 -0300 Lucas De Marchi >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Tue, A

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

On Apr 17, 2013 11:49 AM, "Rafael Antognolli" wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote: > > Cedric Bail > > On Apr 17, 2013 2:22 AM, "Tom Hacohen" wrote: > >> > >> On 17/04/13 02:28, Jérôme Pinot wrote: > >> > On 04/17/13 10:11, David Seikel wrote: > >> >> On Tue, 16 Apr 20

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

On 17/04/13 17:31, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > On Apr 17, 2013 11:49 AM, "Rafael Antognolli" wrote: >> >> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote: >>> Cedric Bail >>> On Apr 17, 2013 2:22 AM, "Tom Hacohen" wrote: On 17/04/13 02:28, Jérôme Pinot wrote: > On 04/17/13 10:11,

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Lucas De Marchi < lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi> wrote: > On Apr 17, 2013 11:49 AM, "Rafael Antognolli" > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Cedric BAIL > wrote: > > > Cedric Bail > > > On Apr 17, 2013 2:22 AM, "Tom Hacohen" > wrote: > > >> > > >>

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Luis Felipe Strano Moraes wrote: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Lucas De Marchi < > lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi> wrote: > >> On Apr 17, 2013 11:49 AM, "Rafael Antognolli" >> wrote: >> > >> > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Cedric BAIL >> wrote: >> > > Ce

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

bad. It sounds like a database. On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:44 PM, thomasg wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Luis Felipe Strano Moraes > wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Lucas De Marchi < > > lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi> wrote: > > > >> On Apr 17, 2013 11:49 AM, "Rafael An

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 7:44 PM, thomasg wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Luis Felipe Strano Moraes > wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Lucas De Marchi < >> lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi> wrote: >> >>> On Apr 17, 2013 11:49 AM, "Rafael Antognolli" >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > On Wed

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 23:50:16 +0100 Tom Hacohen said: > bad. It sounds like a database. we actually have a db wrapper lib (we dont use anymore) called edb.. so thats right out. :) > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:44 PM, thomasg wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:37 AM, Luis Felipe Strano Mora

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Luis Felipe Strano Moraes wrote: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Lucas De Marchi < > lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi> wrote: > >> On Apr 17, 2013 11:49 AM, "Rafael Antognolli" >> wrote: >> > >> > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Cedric BAIL >> wrote: >> > > Ced

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

2013/4/17 Cedric BAIL > Cedric Bail > On Apr 17, 2013 2:22 AM, "Tom Hacohen" wrote: > > > > On 17/04/13 02:28, Jérôme Pinot wrote: > > > On 04/17/13 10:11, David Seikel wrote: > > >> On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 20:57:33 -0300 Lucas De Marchi > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:34 PM,

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

eldbus+1 On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Davide Andreoli wrote: > 2013/4/17 Cedric BAIL > > > Cedric Bail > > On Apr 17, 2013 2:22 AM, "Tom Hacohen" wrote: > > > > > > On 17/04/13 02:28, Jérôme Pinot wrote: > > > > On 04/17/13 10:11, David Seikel wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 20:57:3

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

only if we can get someone to draw a logo of the word "dbus" riding a mechanical bull while wearing a sombrero On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Jose Souza wrote: > eldbus+1 > > > > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Davide Andreoli >wrote: > > > 2013/4/17 Cedric BAIL > > > > > Cedric Bail > >

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

I guess my vote does not really count, but I would vote for +1 eldbus as well, I like the sould of it, El Dbus ... sounds clint eastwoody, best 2013/4/18 Michael Blumenkrantz > only if we can get someone to draw a logo of the word "dbus" riding a > mechanical bull while wearing a sombrero >

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

Let's give an official +1 for eldbus, given how no one believes I was serious about the Platypus. On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Ray wrote: > I guess my vote does not really count, but I would vote for > +1 eldbus > > as well, I like the sould of it, El Dbus ... sounds clint eastwoody, > > best

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

On 04/18/2013 11:31 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: > only if we can get someone to draw a logo of the word "dbus" riding a > mechanical bull while wearing a sombrero > The best I could do: https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-DqAF0NrKjh8/UXAKaFS-A2I/D4Q/NvOPNIrR43s/s583/IMG_20130418_114747

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 13:28:54 -0300 Leandro Pereira wrote: > On 04/18/2013 11:31 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: > > only if we can get someone to draw a logo of the word "dbus" riding a > > mechanical bull while wearing a sombrero > > > > The best I could do: > > https://lh3.googleusercontent.c

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

* Ray [2013-04-18 18:08:33 +0200]: I vote for eedeebas. > I guess my vote does not really count, but I would vote for > +1 eldbus > > as well, I like the sould of it, El Dbus ... sounds clint eastwoody, > > best > > > > 2013/4/18 Michael Blumenkrantz > > > only if we can get someone to dr

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 13:28:41 -0300 Iván Briano wrote: > Let's give an official +1 for eldbus, given how > no one believes I was serious about the Platypus. Pfft, no one even noticed my Echidna, but I'll vote for it anyway. :-P > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Ray wrote: > > I guess my vo

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 2:26 PM, David Seikel wrote: > On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 13:28:41 -0300 Iván Briano > wrote: > >> Let's give an official +1 for eldbus, given how >> no one believes I was serious about the Platypus. > > Pfft, no one even noticed my Echidna, but I'll vote for it anyway. :-P > T

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 14:31:38 -0300 Iván Briano wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 2:26 PM, David Seikel > wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 13:28:41 -0300 Iván Briano > > wrote: > > > >> Let's give an official +1 for eldbus, given how > >> no one believes I was serious about the Platypus. > > > > Pf

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

bah.. edeebus is better ( even eldbus may do (esp. if leandro's logo is used xD)). Enema would be better for an Enlightenment NEtwork MAnager than a dbus lib :p -- Regards, Alex-P. Natsios (a.k.a Drakevr) -- Precog is a

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

On Thu, 18 Apr 2013 21:43:53 +0300 "Alex-P. Natsios" wrote: > bah.. edeebus is better ( even eldbus may do (esp. if leandro's logo > is used xD)). > > Enema would be better for an Enlightenment NEtwork MAnager than a > dbus lib :p DBus, it's a pipe that shit flows through. What better name tha

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 9:51 PM, David Seikel wrote: > DBus, it's a pipe that shit flows through. What better name than > enema? B-) True enough... -- Regards, Alex-P. Natsios (a.k.a Drakevr) -- Precog is a next-gen

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 1:28 AM, Leandro Pereira wrote: > On 04/18/2013 11:31 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: >> only if we can get someone to draw a logo of the word "dbus" riding a >> mechanical bull while wearing a sombrero > > The best I could do: > > https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-DqAF0Nr

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

So, have we decided to call it eldbus? -- Tom. -- Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for building apps and a phenomenal toolset

Re: [E-devel] edbus - Annoying inconsistency

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:24 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > So, have we decided to call it eldbus? Seems like the marketing push of acidx did work. So eldbus it will be. Time to run sed... -- Cedric BAIL -- Precog is a next-g

[E-devel] edbus connman api break.

while making connman work and improve is good... the edbus connman api has been quite heavily broken now. this is now a blocker for efl 1.1 and we can't release until resolved. here is what has happened: e_connman_service_apn_get() removed e_connman_service_apn_set() removed e_connman_service_eth

Re: [E-devel] edbus(2) feature request

On Saturday, December 1, 2012, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: > any chance the notification stuff can be ported over? > > I was going to move shotgun to using edbus2 but I can't until this is > implemented... Even better, we'll expose the client bits in elm, the server (e17) will use edbus directly

Re: [E-devel] edbus(2) feature request

On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 18:08:15 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > On Saturday, December 1, 2012, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: > > > any chance the notification stuff can be ported over? > > > > I was going to move shotgun to using edbus2 but I can't until this is > > implemented... > > > Even

Re: [E-devel] edbus(2) feature request

On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 18:08:15 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > On Saturday, December 1, 2012, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: > > > any chance the notification stuff can be ported over? > > > > I was going to move shotgun to using edbus2 but I can't until this is > > implemented... > > > Even

Re: [E-devel] edbus connman api break.

On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:25:28 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > while making connman work and improve is good... the edbus connman api has > been quite heavily broken now. > > this is now a blocker for efl 1.1 and we can't release until resolved. > here is what has happened: > > e_

Re: [E-devel] edbus connman api break.

On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 04:35:01 -0500 Mike Blumenkrantz said: > On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:25:28 +0900 > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > while making connman work and improve is good... the edbus connman api has > > been quite heavily broken now. > > > > this is now a blocker for efl 1.

Re: [E-devel] edbus connman api break.

On Sat, 19 Nov 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:25:28 +0900 > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > >> while making connman work and improve is good... the edbus connman api has >> been quite heavily broken now. >> >> this is now a blocker for efl 1.1 and we can't rel

Re: [E-devel] edbus connman api break.

On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:41:21 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 04:35:01 -0500 Mike Blumenkrantz said: > > > On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:25:28 +0900 > > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > > > while making connman work and improve is good... the edbus con

Re: [E-devel] edbus connman api break.

On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 04:35:01 -0500 Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:25:28 +0900 > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > while making connman work and improve is good... the edbus connman > > api has been quite heavily broken now. > > > > this is now a blocker for efl 1

Re: [E-devel] edbus connman api break.

On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 10:40:52 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri wrote: > > > On Sat, 19 Nov 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > > > On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:25:28 +0900 > > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > >> while making connman work and improve is good... the edbus connman api has > >> been

Re: [E-devel] edbus connman api break.

On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 19:42:30 +1000 David Seikel wrote: > On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 04:35:01 -0500 Mike Blumenkrantz > wrote: > > > On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:25:28 +0900 > > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > > > while making connman work and improve is good... the edbus connman > > > api ha

Re: [E-devel] edbus connman api break.

On Sat, 19 Nov 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 10:40:52 +0100 (CET) > Vincent Torri wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, 19 Nov 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:25:28 +0900 >>> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: >>> while making connman work and

Re: [E-devel] edbus connman api break.

On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 10:46:53 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri wrote: > > > On Sat, 19 Nov 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > > > On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 10:40:52 +0100 (CET) > > Vincent Torri wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On Sat, 19 Nov 2011, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > >> > >>> On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:25:28 +0

Re: [E-devel] edbus connman api break.

On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 04:43:28 -0500 Mike Blumenkrantz said: > This seems reasonable, but I still stand by my opinion that the release should > be slightly delayed. that'ss a separate topic too - but it probably isnt going to happen sunday or monday - more like mid next week at this rate. -- ---

Re: [E-devel] edbus connman api break.

Oops. make[4]: Entering directory `/home/dvs1/e17_svn/SVN/trunk/e/src/modules/connman' CC e_mod_main.lo CC e_mod_config.lo e_mod_main.c: In function ‘_connman_service_security_find’: e_mod_main.c:340: warning: passing argument 2 of ‘e_connman_service_security_get’ from incompatible p

Re: [E-devel] edbus connman api break.

On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: >> We should probably focus some efforts on rewriting/upgrading it, and then >> bump >> the .so version and do a 2.0 release for just e_dbus. > > better writing an ebus lib like raster told me, not using dbus but our own > implementation. It s

Re: [E-devel] edbus connman api break.

2011/11/19 Lucas De Marchi : > On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: >>> We should probably focus some efforts on rewriting/upgrading it, and then >>> bump >>> the .so version and do a 2.0 release for just e_dbus. >> >> better writing an ebus lib like raster told me, not using dbu

Re: [E-devel] edbus connman api break.

On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > while making connman work and improve is good... the edbus connman api has > been > quite heavily broken now. > > this is now a blocker for efl 1.1 and we can't release until resolved. > here is what has happened: > > e_connman_service_ap

Re: [E-devel] edbus connman api break.

On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 2:18 PM, David Seikel wrote: > Oops. > > make[4]: Entering directory > `/home/dvs1/e17_svn/SVN/trunk/e/src/modules/connman' >  CC     e_mod_main.lo >  CC     e_mod_config.lo > e_mod_main.c: In function ‘_connman_service_security_find’: > e_mod_main.c:340: warning: passing a

Re: [E-devel] edbus connman api break.

On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote: > 2011/11/19 Lucas De Marchi : >> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: We should probably focus some efforts on rewriting/upgrading it, and then bump the .so version and do a 2.0 release for just e_dbus

Re: [E-devel] edbus connman api break.

2011/11/19 David Seikel : > Oops. > > make[4]: Entering directory > `/home/dvs1/e17_svn/SVN/trunk/e/src/modules/connman' >  CC     e_mod_main.lo >  CC     e_mod_config.lo > e_mod_main.c: In function ‘_connman_service_security_find’: > e_mod_main.c:340: warning: passing argument 2 of >  ‘e_connman_s

Re: [E-devel] edbus connman api break.

On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote: > 2011/11/19 David Seikel : >> Oops. >> >> make[4]: Entering directory >> `/home/dvs1/e17_svn/SVN/trunk/e/src/modules/connman' >>  CC     e_mod_main.lo >>  CC     e_mod_config.lo >> e_mod_main.c: In function ‘_connman_service_security_f

Re: [E-devel] edbus connman api break.

On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:24:46 -0200 Lucas De Marchi said: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: > > while making connman work and improve is good... the edbus connman api has > > been quite heavily broken now. > > > > this is now a blocker for efl 1.1 and we can't release u

Re: [E-devel] edbus connman api break.

On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:45:13 -0200 Iván Briano (Sachiel) said: > 2011/11/19 David Seikel : > > Oops. > > > > make[4]: Entering directory > > `/home/dvs1/e17_svn/SVN/trunk/e/src/modules/connman' > >  CC     e_mod_main.lo > >  CC     e_mod_config.lo > > e_mod_main.c: In function ‘_connman_service_s

Re: [E-devel] edbus connman api break.

On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:45:13 -0200 Iván Briano (Sachiel) > said: > >> 2011/11/19 David Seikel : >> > Oops. >> > >> > make[4]: Entering directory >> > `/home/dvs1/e17_svn/SVN/trunk/e/src/modules/connman' >> >  CC     e_mod_main.lo >> >  CC

Re: [E-devel] edbus connman api break.

On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 2:18 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:24:46 -0200 Lucas De Marchi > said: > >> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Carsten Haitzler >> wrote: >> > while making connman work and improve is good... the edbus connman api has >> > been quite heavily broken no

Re: [E-devel] edbus connman api break.

On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 2:18 AM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: >> On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:24:46 -0200 Lucas De Marchi >> said: >> >>> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Carsten Haitzler >>> wrote: >>> > while making connman work and improve is

Re: [E-devel] edbus connman api break.

On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 21:03:00 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Lucas De Marchi > wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 2:18 AM, Carsten Haitzler > > wrote: > >> On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:24:46 -0200 Lucas De Marchi > >> said: > >> > >>> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at

Re: [E-devel] edbus connman api break.

On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 16:36:58 -0200 Lucas De Marchi said: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: > > On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:45:13 -0200 Iván Briano (Sachiel) > > said: > > > >> 2011/11/19 David Seikel : > >> > Oops. > >> > > >> > make[4]: Entering directory > >> > `/home/dv

Re: [E-devel] edbus connman api break.

On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 21:03:00 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri said: > What I tried to mean as well in README is that while libedbus.so is > stable and there is an API for it, everything else in e_dbus/src/lib/ > is convenience that is linked to the target service. As it should be. > We just need th

Re: [E-devel] edbus connman api break.

On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 16:48:55 -0200 Lucas De Marchi said: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 2:18 AM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: > > On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:24:46 -0200 Lucas De Marchi > > said: > > > >> On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Carsten Haitzler > >> wrote: > >> > while making connman work and imp

Re: [E-devel] edbus connman api break.

On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:35:14 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 21:03:00 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > said: > > > What I tried to mean as well in README is that while libedbus.so is > > stable and there is an API for it, everything else in e_dbus/src/lib/ >

Re: [E-devel] edbus connman api break.

On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 21:52:31 -0500 Mike Blumenkrantz wrote: > The current e_dbus can be like embryo, which also will never reach > 2.0. A, poor little embryo will never grow up. I suppose we should be glad to miss out on the terrible twos. -- A big old stinking pile of genius that no one

Re: [E-devel] edbus connman api break.

On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:56:01 +1000 David Seikel wrote: > On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 21:52:31 -0500 Mike Blumenkrantz > wrote: > > > The current e_dbus can be like embryo, which also will never reach > > 2.0. > > A, poor little embryo will never grow up. I suppose we should be > glad to miss out

Re: [E-devel] edbus connman api break.

On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 21:52:31 -0500 Mike Blumenkrantz said: > On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:35:14 +0900 > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 21:03:00 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > > said: > > > > > What I tried to mean as well in README is that while libedbus.so is >

[E-devel] edbus: Fix signal handler extra match check

Could someone review and apply? Thanks 0001-edbus-Fix-signal-handler-extra-match-check.patch Description: Binary data -- Master HTML5, CSS3, ASP.NET, MVC, AJAX, Knockout.js, Web API and much more. Get web development ski

Re: [E-devel] edbus: Fix signal handler extra match check

On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 07:40:52PM -0200, Jose Souza wrote: > Could someone review and apply? > shouldn't counter be reset on every EINA_INLIST_FOREACH(sh->args, arg) iteration? Regards... -- Leandro Dorileo ProFUSION embedded systems http://profusion.mobi ---

Re: [E-devel] edbus: Fix signal handler extra match check

Nops, this counter is used to know what argument of message we are pointing. On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Leandro Dorileo wrote: > On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 07:40:52PM -0200, Jose Souza wrote: >> Could someone review and apply? >> > > shouldn't counter be reset on every EINA_INLIST_FOREACH(sh->a

[E-devel] edbus patchs: one feature request and two bug fixes

Hello zmike ask to add a fixed array append function in edbus so here is a patch, also I find 2 minor issues, someone could review and push to git? Thanks 0001-edbus-Add-edbus_message_iter_fixed_array_append.patch Description: Binary data 0002-edbus-Fix-edbus_pending_destination_get-it-was-re

  1   2   >