I'm just doing a similar paid project for a client to render an Exchange
5.5 mailbox calendar in a monthly view (what a mess!! Doing it
manually).
This Web app tricks a little bit to copy each appointment into a certain
public folder so that in-house user can use MAPI Outlook while the
browser gu
Sure there will be a taker, Chris ;-)
> -Original Message-
> From: Scharff, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 5:23 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Over limits message
>
> I agree it's not a scam, but it seems to me it's indicative of a
lar
Over limits message
>
> I'm sure they'd be happy to package that as an MMC snap-in as well at
no
> additional charge right?
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 12:09 PM
>
> The place that it is wrong is when I open this room from the server
Can you expand how you "open" it from the server? OWA? A MAPI Outlook
(97/98/2000/2002) client?
Are you running Exchange 5.5 Server with SP4? If so, did you apply the
lasted postSP4 hotfixes (especially the one for CDO 1.21)?
fixed
> this, but didn't.
>
> Diane
>
> Diane Boehm
> SC Johnson
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 1.262.260.5330
>
> "There are seldom good technological solutions to
> behavioral problems" - Ed Crowley, Compaq
>
>
> -Original Message-
&g
Inline...
> -Original Message-
> I don't remember. I didn't build the box. That was back in Dec 98.
We
> have installed SPs after Outlook 98, which service pack are you
referring
> to?
Doesn't matter. The important part is to have any Exchange 5.5 SP
installed if you installed Outlook
for all your help on this.
>
> Diane
>
> Diane Boehm
> SC Johnson
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 1.262.260.5330
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 5:00 PM
>
http://www.microeye.com has an excellent tool called "Script Director"
for such tasks. Another free tool is included in the Platform SDK but
isn't half as good.
> -Original Message-
> From: G. Misa III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 5:56 PM
> To: Exchange Dis
I found catutil after moving them via the registry ;-)
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 3:17 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Cc: Peter Szabo
> Subject: RE: E2K full-text indexing
>
> Peter,
>
> There's an article
>
(ht
AFAIK not possible with CDO (any version). I know that this info is
stored in an Extended MAPI property and IIRC it is documented on MSDN.
But I never used it with CDO and I'm glad to say that CDOEXM (CDO for
Exchange 2000 Management) includes such a property for the ease of use
of those people w
Are we talking about an Exchange Server mailbox? If so, which version of
Exchange Server?
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Kerner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:31 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: how can I notify through SMTP that a mailbox
0 fx(303)894-3813
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 3:41 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: how can I notify through SMTP that a mailbox
recieved an
>
ugh SMTP that a mailbox recieved an
item
> ?
>
> There is no version of IIS running on this box.
>
> Matthew Kerner
> Network Administrator, Relocation Tax Services
> ph(303)894-3080 fx(303)894-3813
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -Original Message-
> From:
Most likely you are hitting a problem with not using the correct NT
account to run the ASP code.
http://www.cdolive.com/asp.htm has some nice pointers which should help
you.
> -Original Message-
> From: PC Peichung Chiu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:
> there something specific to OWA I'm not aware of?
>
> Peichung Chiu
> Technologist
> ___
> K O K O I N T E R A C T I V E
> Creativity | Strategy | Technology
>
> 212.924.5388 | http://www.kokointeractive.com
>
>
You can remove it following the article below:
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q187/5/23.asp
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 3:50 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Removing ex Exchange server Eve
ation if I
reinstalled
> the server instead of removing it from the site? I guess that's what
I
> was not sure.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brian
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> > Siegfried W
Which can be changed with an Exchange 2000 Store Event Sink. Not too
hard to write and if the expectations are not too high it could be a
VBScript one (with some drawbacks of course).
Otherwise look out for a commercial product which can do it. I've heard
from being in development/testing for qui
1. To "put" OWA 2000 on a stand-alone server you need to purchase an
Exchange 2000 Server Enterprise Edition
2. OWA 2000 cannot connect to an Exchange 5.5 Server
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 2:23 PM
> To: Exchang
2001 3:09 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: XCH 2000 OWA
>
> OWA only comes with the Enterprise Edition?
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Siegfried Weber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
Didn't we have the same question a couple of days ago? The answer is
that neither Exchange 5.5 nor Exchange 2000 SP1 does provide this
feature with OWA.
> -Original Message-
> From: William E. Grever [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 9:53 PM
> To: Exchange Di
s, and I've been out of town and did
not
> thoroughly scan the conversation topics of the last few days.
>
>
> Will
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 3:57 PM
> To: Exchange Discussio
OL2000: (CW) How to Control the Width of Address Book Columns (Q222878):
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q222/8/78.ASP
> -Original Message-
> From: Schatz, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 3:53 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject
If it really fails on the second line:
> Set objSession = CreateObject("MAPI.Session")
Then you have a configuration/installation problem on this machine.
I'd check if it has at least one of the following products installed:
Exchange 5.5 Server
Exchange 2000 Server
Exchange 5.5 Server OWA
Or
Outlook 2k
>
> Thank you very much Siegfried. I wonder why my technet search for
width +
> address book didn´t find this.
> And thanks to Peter for looking into this.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> &
FYIO: Nice but not necessary for those running Office XP. SP1 (due out
next week) will have a registry key to make all incoming message plain
text.
> -Original Message-
> From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:19 PM
> To: Exchange Discussion
ww.peregrine.com
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:09 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Strip HTML out of incoming mail in OL2000/2002.
> >
> >
>
Personally I haven't done this but I know that it might be possible with
the Windows 2000 SMTP service (which is used by Exchange 2000 also) [1].
There is now built-in support for SMTP Server events to hook into
message delivery. Pretty much the same all third party vendors do with
their SMTP bas
Create a new user & mailbox and assign this user as anonymous account on
the virtual directory of your IIS ASP application should do the trick.
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 9:07 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject:
Ca you put the part in question into a separate IIS virtual directory?
If not, you might need to write a COM component an let it run on
MTS/COM+ with a different user identity.
Note that CDO 1.21 was never tested with MTS/COM+ so YMMV.
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard [mailto:[EMA
Here's another idea:
Change the anonymous account to a domain account and assign it with
owner permissions to the mailbox in question.
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:49 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: CDO
> Unfortunately, a client is required in order to access a PF; even if
you
> do
> some CDO, you are still gonna need a client to gain access to the dir.
No client required if going the programmatic way. You can run this code
on the Exchange Server machine or any other machine that has the
Excahng
Actually, Admin~IT will be a suite of tools and consists of:
Forms Assistant - Used to manage and deploy Outlook forms & views
(including bulk import and export)
Permission Assistant - Used to manage and deploy folder permissions and
delegate rights (including bulk import and export)
Rules Assist
Put your Windows .NET Server beta CD into the drive and install it off
from there. AFAIK, there doesn't exist a public download.
> -Original Message-
> From: Dustin Krysak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 7:48 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: OT:Window
Assuming you are talking about CDO 1.21 the answer is: it is not
documented but somebody (not me) hacked that stuff. Microsoft had a MSKB
article how to accomplish that but removed it due to compatibility
reasons (with other non-Microsoft HTML mail clients).
However, there is an additional DLL pr
AFAIK, CDO 1.21 hasn't been designed for Unicode. You need to use
Extended MAPI for this task.
> -Original Message-
> From: Nagi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 6:35 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: CDO & UNICODE
>
> I am having a problem using CDO
1. There is no Windows XP Server but a Windows .NET Server
2. Exchange 2000 SP1 is currently not supported on Windows .NET Server.
A later Exchange 2000 service pack will probably change this case.
3. It might work to run Exchange 2000 SP1 within a Windows .NET Server
Active Directory forest
> -Original Message-
> Why? I see no problem with asking this question here. I'm sure there
are
> folks testing this now.
Those folks who are testing it have signed an NDA to not tell anything
related to Windows .NET Server in the public. Hence the reason why I'm
not allowed to tell you w
http://www.cdolive.net/samples/adusermanagement.eml has a sample WSH
script that shows how to use (undocumented) stuff how to enable a
Windows 2000 user for Exchange 2000 Instant Messaging.
Feel free to play with that stuff.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
Right. But the only way for OWA 2000 is definitely not to buy the
Messageware stuff. If you're a programmer you can solve this without
paying those bucks and I'm sure somebody will write a simple enhancement
to accomplish that in the near future.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Hlabse
e point me to them.
> - Original Message -
> From: "Siegfried Weber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 6:13 AM
> Subject: RE: owa global address list
>
>
> Right. Bu
uest I get from customers. If anyone
> knows
> of a solution please point me to them.
> - Original Message -
> From: "Siegfried Weber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 6
try. I looked on CDOlive before but must have
missed
> the posting. Thanks again. I see now that if I am to continue doing
> Exchange
> 2000 deployments, VB or other programming classes are going to be
needed
> more than in the past for these type of requests.
>
>
> -
00 will be their main email client until they decide
> otherwise.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "Siegfried Weber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 1:03 PM
> S
That is the next thing the customer is
> looking
> for. Seems OWA 2000 will be their main email client until they decide
> otherwise.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Siegfried Weber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions"
to a longer project.
> - Original Message -
> From: "Siegfried Weber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 1:22 PM
> Subject: RE: owa global address list
>
>
> Synchro
> You can use GAL entries in Outlook contact DLs without any issues. I
can
> see the need for PDA users though.
>
> S.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 1:23 PM
> To: Exchange Discussio
Yeah! I remember when it took minutes (if not hours?) before it showed
up. Lucky me that I fixed *that* bug before it went public or the stick
would have hit me hard the first time we met in person ;-)
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesd
I believe the issue you are running into is the authentication method or
the anonymous LDAP access on the Exchange machine. Make sure you disable
NTLM/Integrated Windows Authentication and use an IUSR_ account
with password which really works.
BTW, what version of Windows (service pack?) and Exch
IIS administration. No changes on code-level necessary.
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:18 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: CDOLive's Phonelist ASP Not Running On Exchange Server
>
> Regarding the authent
Hmmm, I never used Exchange 5.5 OWA on a Windows 2000 /Workstation/. But
I believe this should work.
Are you saying OWA on this Windows 2000 WS works? In this case I'd focus
on the IIS virtual directory settings. You did create a new IIS virtual
directory for the phone list app, don't you? And ma
Does this domain account actually have the permissions to logon to this
particular WS. Try to just logon at the console of that machine with
this account. Does it work?
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:41 PM
> To: Exch
So, what account does OWA use on that machine?
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 12:13 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: CDOLive's Phonelist ASP Not Running On Exchange Server
>
> Does this domain account actua
Exchange 5.5 OWA is build with CDO 1.21. So, if you experience such
calendar corruption go and install the postSP4 fixes.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 7:37 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Auto Accep
FYIO: Exchange 2000 Instant Messaging has up to 20 minutes latency until
your status will be updated on the server.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Ault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 2:36 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: www.slipstick.com/
>
A bit more information about the version of Exchange Server you use
would be nice.
Anyways, Exchange 2000 OWA will have this feature with SP2. See:
http://support.microsoft.com/servicedesks/webcasts/wc110101/wcblurb11010
1.asp
(watch the line break)
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert
Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:36 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Search function in OWA?
>
> SP2 looks great. Does anybody know of an ETA for it?
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Siegfried Weber" <[EM
CDO.Folder is an interface which is only available with CDO for Exchange
2000 (aka CDOEX). CDOEX is only installed on top of Exchange 2000 Server
locally and does also only run locally on the Exchange 2000 Server
machine.
My guess is that you are using it on a remote machine, either a Windows
200
Only if you use Exchange 5.5 since it doesn't use SMTP as core delivery
mechanism. Exchange 2000 does and I believe it is possible to hook into
this part of the delivery, although it might be a performance hit and
require huge amount of custom development since it's not a trivial task
;-)
(Hi Mis
Instead of using ExIFS use HTTP. No limitations, no problems! Just
connect the public folder as a Webfolder using
http://servername/public/foldername.
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 3:00 PM
> To: Exchange Discussion
I believe the original poster mentioned Exchange 5.5 but the URL you
pointed him to is only for Exchange 2000.
In case of Exchange 5.5 http://www.cdolive.com/pfalert.htm would be more
helpful.
> -Original Message-
> From: Barb McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, Janua
Not for 5.5. Only stuff for 2000/AD.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 4:25 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: New Mailbox Creation
>
> Are you sure? I could have sworn that Siegfried had that.
>
> Ed Crow
http://www.cdolive.com/saveatt.htm has a free server-based Event script
to accomplish that on every message arriving in a particular folder.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 2:30 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: U
Does the vulnerability affect the SMTP service in Exchange Server 5.5?
No. Exchange 5.5, even if installed on Windows 2000, uses its own SMTP
service, which is not affected by the vulnerability
> -Original Message-
> From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, Februa
Bulletin - MS02-012
>
> My gosh, Siefried! You must be
AWAKE
> ALREADY!!!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 8:14 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Alert:Microsoft S
If you look close to both, MS02-011 & MS02-012, you'll see that they
both point to the same patch for Windows 2000.
Only MS02-011 includes a patch for the Exchange 5.5 IMS, not MS02-012.
You can have both, Exchange 5.5 IMS & Windows 2000 SMTP, on the same
machine. All you need to do is either:
ity Bulletin - MS02-012
>
> E In place upgrade :)
>
> I did say you could have both. With tweaking just as you explained.
> But in place upgrades don't exist in my world, so that is why I do it
the
> MS
> way.
>
> Just different ways of doing things. Righ
TED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 3:05 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Alert:Microsoft Security Bulletin - MS02-012
>
> ::runs screaming from room:: :)
>
> But some of us know you are the man. I wouldn't trust some folks with
> that!
>
> ---
;
> But it's only THURSDAY!
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 8:25 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Alert:Microsoft Security Bulletin - MS02-012
>
>
> You're kiddi
I got two. Before the sender address ended up in my killfile...
> -Original Message-
> From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 5:19 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Cooking.com Replies?
>
> Yeah I'm getting them to.
>
> -O
You do know that you only get a logon dialog when using Basic
Authentication, don't you? With Windows Integrated Authentication there
is no reason for a default domain because the user credentials are
passed from IE to IIS.
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Right. This is the so-called "Basic Authentication". In this case you
either can enter the default logon domain in IIS (or, if using Exchange
2000 - ESM) or just enter "\" to enable UPN style logons in a Windows
2000/Exchange 2000 environment.
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Hlabse [m
PFAlert. Correct. But since the site is moving to a new home (and new
design + content) you'll be able to reach it only via IP at the moment:
http://195.97.240.247/start.htm or http://195.97.240.247/pfalert.htm for
the direct sample link.
> -Original Message-
> From: William Lefkovics
Side-note:
This strongly depends on your networking infrastructure. Outlook 2000 &
2002 resource booking feature requires a RPC connection to the resource
mailbox when you schedule an appointment/event and invite this resource.
I can imagine a whole lot of scenarios where this is not the case.
O
Really not necessary to write a script or restart the services. You just
need to add the Exchange 2000 Information Store Service (internal name
"MSExchangeIS" - case sensitive!) as service dependency to the World
Wide Web Service (internal name "W3Svc").
See:
How to Delay Loading of Specific Ser
You Mom told you not to mess things up, or?
Only thing that comes in mind is deleting the calendar folder and let
Outlook recreate it with "outlook.exe /resetfolders"
> -Original Message-
> From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 10:15 PM
> To: Exch
For existing accounts, check:
How to Change Active Directory Display Names:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q300427
Change Display Names of Active Directory Users with ADSI Script:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q277717
> -Original Messa
AFAIK you cannot force all Exchange IM traffic going through the
Exchange IM Virtual Server. The IM Virtual Server actually is hosting a
node database only which holds the presence information of who's
online/away etc.
As soon as you are issuing a new chat session the IM Virtual Server
receives a
The Exchange 2000 version of this script is up for a while at
http://www.cdolive.net/download/StoreEvent-SaveAttachment.zip but there
is no documentation available and you need to read up on MSDN/TechNet
how that stuff is supposed to work if you never used an Exchange 2000
Store Event Sink.
> -
If you know how to write code, you can.
Just my $.02 US
Back to test the latest version of my DNS RBL blocking script for the
Windows 2000 SMTP Service ;-)
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 6:28 PM
> To: Exchan
You should either reconsider your decision to have port 137 opened or
install the latest Microsoft Security patch:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/secur
ity/bulletin/MS02-045.asp
Quote from NT Bugtraq:
It was bad enough in theory, but now a script-tot friendl
Never underestimate a dead horse ;-)
Notes/Domino and the other integrating products like SameTime (used by
the US Navy because it was the only one 2-3 years back which offered
encrypted Instant Messaging with logging etc.) and QuickPlace (which
scales way better than Sharepoint and offers other
That whitepaper was indeed written before Exchange 2000 SP2 came out
which introduced a lot of new features also causing some architectural
changes. The file you can modify on Exchange 2000 SP2+
vw_Navbar20.js,but remember: any of those modifications are unsupported
and installing a service pack mi
1. The script (which is a slightly modified version of
http://www.cdolive.com/changemessageclass.htm) your co-worker found is
designed for the Exchange Event Service which is only provided in
Exchange 2000/2003 for backwards compatibility and I would not recommend
using it with Exchange 2000/2003 d
http://www.cdolive.net/download/adusermanagement.zip includes a sample
how to modify ExchangeLegacyDN.
Development Lead,
CDOLive LLC - The Microsoft Messaging and Collaboration Application
Experts
http://www.cdolive.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Pham, Tuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
By multiplying the data n-times on each users hard drive. Why n-times?
Because you loose SIS (Single Instance Storage) if you move data out of
the central Exchange Storage database into gazillions of PST files
(which are prone to get corrupted, limited to 2GB, slow and other
quirks).
Development
Outlook Web Access is a *SERVER* application running against the
Exchange *SERVER* Store database. A PST *FILE* is a local *CLIENT* copy
of data only accessible by a *CLIENT* application like Outlook
97/98/2000/2002/2003.
Should answer the question...
Development Lead,
CDOLive LLC - The Micros
Sounds like it works for you unless people want to search their whole
mailbox after moving small doses into a PST.
Also, make sure nobody ever tries to switch a 3GB mailbox to a PST ;-)
Have fun with PST's :-) I used to use one back in 1998/99 and suffered
more than one time from corruption and d
Should we consider that as SPAM?
Development Lead,
CDOLive LLC - The Microsoft Messaging and Collaboration Application
Experts
http://www.cdolive.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Tuip [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 8:03 PM
> To: Exchange Discus
if
> I need to do a search on those, I use Active Folders. If
> they need to archive, we've been archiving by deal (only the
> dead/completed deals) -- one pst file per deal so the pst
> file usually never gets anywhere near 1 GB.
>
>
> -Original Message-
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 2:31 PM
> Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
> Conversation: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note
> Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note
>
> Question then Why did they
>
>
>
> Joshua Morgan
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 1:16 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note
>
>
> 1. The script (
==
> ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm
> ====
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Posted At: Friday, June 20, 2003 2:31 PM
> Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
>
You can already use OWA to open somebody else's mailbox calendar or
anther public folder because this data is stored on the server.
I can imagine a custom application to import a PST into the Exchanger
server database using a Web browser based interface that integrates into
OWA (fairly simple, wo
uploading it first?
> -Original Message-
> From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 4:26 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA?
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAI
> the internet comes into PF as posts. Some of our rules just
> stop working at times, though, on notes with nothing in the
> logs and with logging turned up to max. If you've never had
> a lot of PFs in 5.5 and now you've gone to E2K, you can't
> really underst
harm in making PF's actually do mail correctly going forward.
>
>
>
> ERM (Exchange Resource Manager) Released http://www.swinc.com/erm
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From
erything from
> > the internet comes into PF as posts. Some of our rules just stop
> > working at times, though, on notes with nothing in the logs
> and with
> > logging turned up to max. If you've never had a lot of PFs
> in 5.5 and
> > now you've
Follow up: doesn't look like it included in Exchange 2003 RC1. Tried it
and it is still IPM.Post...
> -Original Message-
> From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 6:34 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IP
antations first?
>
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
> Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
> Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Siegfried Weber
> Sent:
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
