Hello List,
Does anyone know how to get Konqueror to save settings? I have tried
everything I can think of but I keep getting icon view and a small screen
when I open the file manager. I hope I'm not stuck with that.
TIA.
--
Dennis Robertson 2/2 Sylvia Street NOOSAVILLE QLD 4566
Phone: 61
I have LM 7.2 on one machine using a realtek 8139 10/100 Ethernet card,
the DHCP host is (unfortunately) a Win2K machine with a 3Com 3C905
10/100 card using network sharing . . .
When the Linux box fires up - it finds it's address no problem - and
continues happily along in the boot process. Whe
Anyone got an educated guess when LM will be publishing a version with a
2.4 kernel??
Been waiting to upgrade to the latest KDE and all the "fun" stuff but
figured I'd wait for the latest kernel as well.
TIA
Joe
The box said,
"Requires Windows 3.x or better",
so I got Linux.
Registered Linux
I don't know how this happened, but suddenly I can no longer install
rpms from my LM 7.2 installation CDs.
When I start rpmdrake I get a message that "RpmDrake was unable to find
any package. Please, check your installation. If you made an NFS
install, check the NFS directories are still corre
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 01:41:59PM +0100, Robert Fox wrote:
> I have LM 7.2 on one machine using a realtek 8139 10/100 Ethernet card,
> the DHCP host is (unfortunately) a Win2K machine with a 3Com 3C905
> 10/100 card using network sharing . . .
>
> When the Linux box fires up - it finds it's addr
Usually I've discovered this kind of symptom is attributed to
logging issues where a daemon is trying to discover the name
of the IP address of the machine requesting the service.
By creating authoritive DNS zone files for your network
or simply entering names for each of the IP addresses which
I installed LM7.2 with security setting High. So it installed kernel-secure
for me. I want to add a module to kernel for ip_masq_h323 to allow windows
clients on the local network to use NetMeeting.
I have ip_masq_h323.c. All I want is the kernel-secure sources so that I can
recompile the kerne
I installed LM7.2 with security setting High. So it installed kernel-secure
for me. I want to add a module to kernel for ip_masq_h323 to allow windows
clients on the local network to use NetMeeting.
I have ip_masq_h323.c. All I want is the kernel-secure sources so that I can
recompile the kerne
> Anyone got an educated guess when LM will be publishing a version with a
> 2.4 kernel??
The 7.2 Deluxe box I looked at last week said something about the
2.2.17 kernel and being able to try the 2.4 kernel. That box, by the
way, made no reference to KDE 1.99 either.
> Been waiting to upgrade
On Saturday 13 January 2001 11:31, Larry Marshall wrote:
> > Been waiting to upgrade to the latest KDE and all the "fun" stuff but
> > figured I'd wait for the latest kernel as well.
>
> If you're running 7.2, I encourage you to download KDE2.1 and install
> it.
But wait until Monday evening
> But wait until Monday evening.. !!! ..
>
> Major fixes/updates happening this weekend!
This is exciting. Thanks for the update.
As long as I'm writing here, I thought I'd mention that I've become a
CUPS lover. It does take a bit of effort to get the proper stuff for
your system. I
Well, bummer.
I was happily installing LM 7.2 onto my laptop, and had
gotten all the way to setting up printers, when I accidentally
chose add printer when I did not have any more to add.
So, I was in the infinite loop asking what kind of printer
I wanted (local, lpr, samba, I think).
"Ah, not t
On September 22, 2001 06:24 am, D. R. Evans wrote:
> On 21 Sep 01, at 19:55, Eric Paynter wrote:
> > On September 21, 2001 07:03 pm, you wrote:
> > > I don't know how this happened, but suddenly I can no longer install
> > > rpms from my LM 7.2 installation CDs.
> >
> > What happens when you do a
On September 21, 2001 07:03 pm, you wrote:
> I don't know how this happened, but suddenly I can no longer install
> rpms from my LM 7.2 installation CDs.
>
> When I start rpmdrake I get a message that "RpmDrake was unable to find
> any package. Please, check your installation. If you made an NFS
>
On 22 Sep 01, at 7:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED],Eric Paynter wrote:
> On 21 Sep 01, at 19:55, Eric Paynter wrote:
>
> > On September 21, 2001 07:03 pm, you wrote:
> > > I don't know how this happened, but suddenly I can no longer install
> > > rpms from my LM 7.2 installation CDs.
> > >
> > > When I s
Hi,
I have got problems with the german mutations and postgresql on LM7.2.
This signs are stored on the server not in the expected way:
For example: I have inserted a name called J(oe)rn, where (oe) ist a
german mutation. The output (in a php/html script) is ok, but I cannot
use "J(oe)rn" in a sq
> I installed LM7.2 with security setting High. So it installed kernel-secure
> for me. I want to add a module to kernel for ip_masq_h323 to allow windows
> clients on the local network to use NetMeeting.
> I have ip_masq_h323.c. All I want is the kernel-secure sources so that I can
> recompile
W-TO for more details, since it also talks about
video-conferering.
> Original Message Follows
> From: Daniel Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Amit Bapat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [expert] LM 7.2 kernel-secure sources
> Dat
Does this also enable NetMeeting to work?
Original Message Follows
From: Daniel Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Amit Bapat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] LM 7.2 kernel-secure sources
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 12:29:16 -0700 (MST)
> I insta
Hallo all,
well I have some problems with the network services and LM 7.2. I do not have a
network card, just want to use the loopback device lo.
I have activated the network service at startup, then I also have activated
xinetd and inetd at startup.
My first question, can inetd and xinetd run
I just installed development workstation & d/l the latest ssh package &
installed it. I had been having problems w/ the default ssh client
installed when trying to use scp, I'd get ssh1->ssh2 errors...
Joseph Red
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hey, while I've got the keyboard, I've got a question - if
LM 7.2 and beyond (part 2)
(http://forum.mandrakesoft.com/article.php3?sid=20001019091828)
Two days ago I asked your opinions about linux: where we are, what is good, what is
bad, where should we go etc.
Well, I got what I asked for: 71 answer so far.
I'll try to summarize what You said so far,
Andrew George wrote:
(My original message pasted below)
> Umm...if you swap the WWW bit for a console...isn't this what dselect does?
I don't know, I haven't tried debian yet. Of course, every distro would
benefit from something like this.
My real point is that doing what I suggested in the o
I just finished a successful fresh install of Mandrake 7.2 on a PCChips'
Book PC (i810-based motherboard) over the weekend. I did a custom install,
low security, development system, but wound up installing all packages. I
used CD-R disks from www.cheapbytes.com. One quirk under the graphical
insta
On Saturday 04 November 2000 15:29, you wrote:
> > Hello List,
> Does anyone know how to get Konqueror to save settings? I have tried
> everything I can think of but I keep getting icon view and a small screen
> when I open the file manager. I hope I'm not stuck with that.
> TIA.
Hello Dennis
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 06:54:35PM +0200, jarmo wrote:
> On Saturday 04 November 2000 15:29, you wrote:
>
> > > Hello List,
> > Does anyone know how to get Konqueror to save settings? I have tried
> > everything I can think of but I keep getting icon view and a small screen
> > when I open the
Hi all,
I've installed LM 7.2, all seems fine, but I'm not able to connect to any
network services. I cannot telnet/ftp into my own box. Cannot connect to port
80 and 119. I just get errors that network is not available. Something is
blocking all services I think. I tried it with xined or inetd b
On Tuesday 13 February 2001 06:10 am, Andreas Müller wrote:
> My first question, can inetd and xinetd run at the same time?
No, these should not be run together. Xinetd is a replacement for Inetd.
Pick one or the other.
> Then again I have to start inetd manually to add:
Probably related to
> Publish upgrade-packs instead of new distros.
This is probably one of the most important. What I (and I would think a lot
of other users) need is an easier upgrade path. That is, one that doesn't
require blowing away the previous installation and config files. Let's face
it, even Micro$oft m
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 09:18:29AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> LM 7.2 and beyond (part 2)
> (http://forum.mandrakesoft.com/article.php3?sid=20001019091828)
>
> Two days ago I asked your opinions about linux: where we are, what is good, what is
>bad, where should we go etc.
> Well, I got wh
> This is probably one of the most important. What I (and I would think a lot
> of other users) need is an easier upgrade path. That is, one that doesn't
> require blowing away the previous installation and config files. Let's face
> it, even Micro$oft managed that (they just blow away every ot
Absolutely!
Jeff Malka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Registered Linux user 183185
- Original Message -
From: Austin L. Denyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> This is probably one of the most important. What I (and I would think a
lot
> of other users) need is an easier upgrade path. That is, one that doe
> Keep all the packages up-to-date
Probably not a popular opinion but it makes more sense to keep most of
those packages one version behind the cutting edge in your official
distributions. All you need to do is look at what's going on right now
with RH7.0 to see that being on the edge can spe
> Uhm...that already exists doesn't it? I've upgraded from 7.0->7.1 without
> losing any of my setup. I've also done the upgrade from
> 7.1->7.2beta on one of my non-work computers. Where's the problem?
I've not tried the latest releases, but upgrading 6.5 to 7.0 didn't work - I
had to totall
Submitted 19-Oct-00 by Austin L. Denyer:
> I've not tried the latest releases, but upgrading 6.5 to 7.0 didn't work - I
> had to totally re-install.
6.5 wasn't really Mandrake; it was MacMillan's repackaging of Mandrake 6.1.
They broke a lot of thing in it, which caused no end of headaches for m
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000 09:41:13 +0200, Marco Fioretti said:
> IMHO, it would be wonderful to do it on the www site BEFORE
> installing, something like this:
>
>
> 1) You get the package list from the site, and study
> it at your leisure, figuring out what you really
> need
>
Larry Marshall wrote:
>
> > Keep all the packages up-to-date
>
> Probably not a popular opinion but it makes more sense to keep most of
> those packages one version behind the cutting edge in your official
> distributions. All you need to do is look at what's going on right now
> with RH7.0
> > I've not tried the latest releases, but upgrading 6.5 to 7.0 didn't
work - I
> > had to totally re-install.
>
> 6.5 wasn't really Mandrake; it was MacMillan's repackaging of Mandrake
6.1.
> They broke a lot of thing in it, which caused no end of headaches for many
> users. I was able to easil
?
- Original Message -
From: "Buchan Milne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 7:30 AM
Subject: Re: [expert] LM 7.2 and beyond (part 2)
>
>
> Larry Marshall wrote:
> >
> > > Keep all the packages up-
> This is my opinion.
>
> I sit on both edges of the OS fence (I use M$ aat work and Linux at
home.)
> Unfortunately, I can not see giving most of the users I work with any
linux
> packages at all. They would never get past the installations. Does this
> mean they are ignorant. Yep! But
> I sit on both edges of the OS fence (I use M$ aat work and Linux at home.)
> Unfortunately, I can not see giving most of the users I work with any linux
> packages at all. They would never get past the installations. Does this
> mean they are ignorant. Yep! But, you would not want me doing
> I agree. We need a 'newbie' install option that makes all the technical
> decisions for you, as well as the other install options for those with more
> knowledge.
Do you view a RH installation as being this sort of installation? What
about Corel? The problem I see with these installations i
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000 11:04:27 -0400 (EDT), Larry Marshall said:
> I think you're right but it's a tough call what to include/exclude.
The
> silly thing is that the first things the "ignorant" ones want to do is
> play music, games and connect to napster. I do believe that dumping the
> wid
I don't find the existing install that hard. If a ignorant user has enough
space on the hard disk he or she could just go ahead and ignore all the
geekoid stuff that somehow gets stuck on there unless you really pick and
choose. There ought to be a warning, however, that choosing the
simpleminde
digiryde wrote:
>
> This is my opinion.
>
> I sit on both edges of the OS fence (I use M$ aat work and Linux at home.)
> Unfortunately, I can not see giving most of the users I work with any linux
> packages at all. They would never get past the installations. Does this
> mean they are
> > I agree. We need a 'newbie' install option that makes all the technical
> > decisions for you, as well as the other install options for those with
more
> > knowledge.
>
> Do you view a RH installation as being this sort of installation? What
> about Corel? The problem I see with these inst
> That is a difficult area for me to comment on, as I haven't installed RedHat
> since 5.1, and I have never used Corel. The only other distros I've played
> with are SlackWare UMSDOS and TurboLinux.
The reason I ask is that Corel's installation asks almost no questions
except for basic passwor
> The reason I ask is that Corel's installation asks almost no questions
> except for basic password stuff. The result is that their installer
> breaks often during installations. RedHat's installer lets you test
> video and such and works quite well but it doesn't ask many questions
> either un
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000 23:39:23 Austin L. Denyer wrote:
>
> I hate to compare Linux to Windoze (in general Linux rocks, Windoze quivers)
> but the 'add/remove programs' bit will automagically tell you if you need
> additional stuff in order to run an application (albeit only stuff on their
> CD) a
> > I hate to compare Linux to Windoze (in general Linux rocks, Windoze quivers)
> > but the 'add/remove programs' bit will automagically tell you if you need
> > additional stuff in order to run an application (albeit only stuff on their
> > CD) and will automagically install it for you at the s
kpackage and similar offer a graphic inetrface that is similar to
add/remove programs - they just havent gone the step further and
integrated extra module control, you have to do it. And as for tryng to
add say, gxedit and having extra packages installed, thats called
dependencies in linux - if y
It seems to me that there are several levels of Linux User installation
being talked about.
It is important then to know at whom we are aiming the system. Target
Marketing - works wonders ;-)
See is you agree with me, or set me straight.
The different users would look like (and the most likel
> The different users would look like (and the most likely percentage of
> current computer users): *** This is my Gut feeling.
> .5% Guru - If the guru does not know the answer, normally, nobody
> does.
> 2% Advanced user - Can handle all day to day issues, plan, build
> an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> package selection during install is too much work to do.
>
Absolutely
IMHO, it would be wonderful to do it on the www site BEFORE
installing, something like this:
1) You get the package list from the site, and study
it at your leisure, figuring
"Austin L. Denyer" wrote:
> > This is my opinion.
> >
> > I sit on both edges of the OS fence (I use M$ aat work and Linux at
> home.)
> > Unfortunately, I can not see giving most of the users I work with any
> linux
> > packages at all. They would never get past the installations. Does th
> Perhaps a two part installer. Part one is totally automated, and sets up
> everything that it can be really sure about. Then the second phase which should
> have, say 4 level 1 choices, each of which have an update variant:
>
> a) Easy Install : assume that the user doesn't have any idea abou
[snip]
>
> Excellent Ideas. To carry it (run script from floppy) farther... the first part of
> the install would ensure an internet connection, the second part would call into
> play someone's (sorry forgot who) idea of a web based script that would allow a user
> to select from packages to l
Buchan Milne wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > Excellent Ideas. To carry it (run script from floppy) farther... the first part
>of
> > the install would ensure an internet connection, the second part would call into
> > play someone's (sorry forgot who) idea of a web based script that would allow a
>us
On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Charles Hixson wrote:
>
> One thing to fix. If the X window installation goofs, then the install process is
>broken. There doesn't seem to be any way to switch to a text mode at that point.
>(Well, ok, this was an install of somebody else. But the point is important
>
One thing to fix. If the X window installation goofs, then the install process is
broken. There doesn't seem to be any way to switch to a text mode at that point.
(Well, ok, this was an install of somebody else. But the point is important anyway.)
X window locked up
solid. This needs to
Jeff Cours wrote:
>
> I just finished a successful fresh install of Mandrake 7.2 on a PCChips'
> Book PC (i810-based motherboard) over the weekend. I did a custom install,
> low security, development system, but wound up installing all packages. I
> used CD-R disks from www.cheapbytes.com. One
Hi,
I want to make sure I have this right. I want to install LM 7.2 onto an ASUS
motherboard with an ata 100 controller. I need to install LM first with the
hd hooked up to the ata 66 controller (just non ata 100 right?). After the
system is installed and working, I install say the unofficia
type ifconfig at the # and see what that says - it sounds like your network
card has not been activated or not found.
hth
- Original Message -
From: "Andreas Müller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 4:18 PM
Subjec
Am Don, 08 Feb 2001 schrieben Sie:
> type ifconfig at the # and see what that says - it sounds like your network
> card has not been activated or not found.
Hallo Mike,
well first I do not have a network card at all, just want to use the loopback
127.0.0.1.
Now typing ifconfig gives nothing.
[
What happens when you type...
# ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1 up
Are you able to ping now?
On Thursday 08 February 2001 12:30, Andreas Müller wrote:
> [root@localhost /root]# ifconfig -a
> lo Linkverkapselung:Locale Schleife
> LOOPBACK MTU:3924 Metric:1
> Empfangene Pakete
I cannot telnet/ftp into my own box. Cannot connect to
> port
> 80 and 119. I just get errors that network is not available. Something
> is
There needs to be a 7.2 FAQ! This question comes up often... here are
some things to check:
ifconfig -a - look for your network address and UP
ping network
From: "Andreas Müller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] LM 7.2 new install and network probs
> Am Don, 08 Feb 2001 schrieben Sie:
> > type ifconfig at the # and see what that says - it sounds lik
#ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1 up
ya have to tell it the ip?
--- Andreas Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Don, 08 Feb 2001 schrieben Sie:
> > type ifconfig at the # and see what that says - it sounds like your
> network
> > card has not been activated or not found.
>
> Hallo Mike,
>
> well first
> There needs to be a 7.2 FAQ! This question comes up often... here are
> some things to check:
Thanx Ron,
adding the IP did the trick and all services are available. Well, I just do not
understand why the lo device is not installed and activated as default like in
previous LM versions. The sa
Am Don, 08 Feb 2001 schrieben Sie:
> What happens when you type...
>
> # ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1 up
>
> Are you able to ping now?
Hallo,
yes, adding the IP did the trick. Now, where to activate the device lo at
startup? My old LM 7 box is starting lo, I did not found any entries concerning
lo in
On Friday 09 February 2001 06:11, Andreas Müller wrote:
> I did not find any entries
> concerning lo in any startupservices.
I've never installed on a system without a NIC so I'm not sure what you've
got ...
-
option 1 - the preferred road (if /etc/r
Attempted to install from a freshly made CD-ROM (ISO image) but all attempts
fail in the following sequence:
- Create a boot disk:
I place a freshly formatted (DOS/FAT 1.44MB in A Drive) diskette in the drive
and ask it to create the boot disk. It doesn't appear to even access the
floppy driv
Please Help !!!
my system is running Xfree86 4.0.1 on LM7.2 and kde2.0
system info = 810 intel mother board + 550e pIII + 192M
when i drag another window on top pf konsole ro xemacs window
the window gets garbled in places where the edges of the dragged window
was present inside konsole/xema
I don't know why the installation is failing, but the big problem I see is
that you do not have a kernel image in your boot directory. You should
have at least 1 kernel image there. There is also no System.map.
Maybe during install you are de-selecting all the Kernel images options ??
On Sat
"Tony K. Olsen" wrote:
> I do not wish to download any more 680MB files if I can help it :-)
You neglect to assure us that the downloaded iso images matched their
md5sum. It is essential to check this.
If the md5sums do not match, you do not have to re-download another
680 MB. Just use rsync
>"Tony K. Olsen" wrote:
>
>> I do not wish to download any more 680MB files if I can help it :-)
>
>You neglect to assure us that the downloaded iso images matched their
>md5sum. It is essential to check this.
>
>If the md5sums do not match, you do not have to re-download another
>680 MB. Just
"Tony K. Olsen" wrote:
> I think the problem was in the burning stage -- not quite sure why (4
> coasters made so far). The md5sum checks out (using BeOS for md5sum/
> cdrecord). Until I get a Linux distribution working on this machine I am
> unable to use rsync as there is no BeOS version
On Tuesday 19 December 2000 21:29, you wrote:
A sure fix is
Option "noaccel"
but this is an expensive one in terms of game performance. I would suggest
you have a "two-config monte" type setup with
XFree86-4.gam as you submitted it
XFree86-4.nvi as below with the option
and a cou
78 matches
Mail list logo
