--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Some people here are just
pissed about the call of the Satsang givers, to give up seeking, to
rather look at the truth which is there right now.
I don't recall people getting pissed at the call to give up
Thanks. Good responses.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff no_reply@
wrote:
Some people here are just
pissed about the call of the Satsang givers, to give up seeking, to
rather look at the
On Apr 11, 2006, at 6:47 AM, t3rinity wrote:
Nisargadatta said many times, that he was simply
lucky that he believed and trusted his master, and that he wasn't a
great intellect. He got it because he had trust, and accepted the
truth in the core of his heart, and that is the only way it can
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 11, 2006, at 6:47 AM, t3rinity wrote:
Nisargadatta said many times, that he was simply
lucky that he believed and trusted his master, and that he wasn't a
great intellect. He got it because he had trust, and
On Apr 11, 2006, at 11:51 AM, t3rinity wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 11, 2006, at 6:47 AM, t3rinity wrote:
Nisargadatta said many times, that he was simply
lucky that he believed and trusted his master, and that he
wasn't a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff
no_reply@ wrote:
As i said previously, the breaking of IT into infinite flow
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Apr 8, 2006, at 10:14 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
I can only speak from my experience, which pertains to your
following point
as well,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
Ever watched a bunch of Gelukpa monks--who spend a lot of their
time experientially investigating consciousness--debate?
No, but some how I feel
On Apr 8, 2006, at 11:11 PM, anon_couscous_ff wrote:
Puja's an example. A most profound darshan.
The Holy Tradition puja? Indeed...really a form of guru-yoga IMMO.
Yes, thats the example I was referring to.
But upon reflection, various pujas and homas also create a strong
darshan
On Apr 8, 2006, at 11:19 PM, anon_couscous_ff wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ever watched a bunch of Gelukpa monks--who spend a lot of their
time experientially investigating consciousness--debate?
No, but some how I feel exactly as if I have.
On Apr 9, 2006, at 4:59 AM, t3rinity wrote:From what I know, and what I have seenin the Satsang movement, this is exactly what is being done there: Thetruth of non-duality is being pointed out and explained in terms ofhis own everyday experience, it is being discussed, and quite oftenpeople are
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 4:59 AM, t3rinity wrote:
From what I know, and what I have seen
in the Satsang movement, this is exactly what is being done
there: The
truth of non-duality is being pointed out and explained in terms
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 4:59 AM, t3rinity wrote:
From what I know, and what I have seen
in the Satsang movement, this is exactly what is being done there: The
truth of non-duality is being pointed out and explained in terms
On Apr 9, 2006, at 11:31 AM, anon_couscous_ff wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 4:59 AM, t3rinity wrote:
From what I know, and what I have seen
in the Satsang movement, this is exactly what is being done
there: The
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 11:31 AM, anon_couscous_ff wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 4:59 AM, t3rinity wrote:
From what I know, and what I have seen
in the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 11:31 AM, anon_couscous_ff wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
In some posts there seems to be a jumping around between a describing
a dualistic state, turiyatita,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only reply I have for both of you, is, 'argue for your
limitations, and they are yours'.
And where pray tell is there arguing for our limitations in the
above? The above simply points out some observed apparent
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 4/8/06 9:46 PM, anon_couscous_ff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But all this vers from my main point: why the prohibition and extreme
reactions to simply asking questions about eperiences.
By whom?
Well Jim is
On Apr 9, 2006, at 12:19 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:The only reply I have for both of you, is, 'argue for your limitations, and they are yours'. There is simply *no way* to justify the steps or signs of Enlightenment through the lens of the small self ego, something which you both persist in doing.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer fairfieldlife@
wrote:
on 4/8/06 9:46 PM, anon_couscous_ff at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
But all this vers from my main point: why the prohibition and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff
no_reply@ wrote:
It raises the question as to why the observations and questions are
being ignored.
One possible hypothesis is because they have no
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff
no_reply@ wrote:
It raises the question as to why the observations and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
That may be a story you are comfortable with, as you trot it out
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 4:59 AM, t3rinity wrote:
From what I know, and what I have seen
in the Satsang movement, this is exactly what is being done
there: The
truth of non-duality is being pointed out and explained in terms
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 4:59 AM, t3rinity wrote:
From what I know, and what I have seen
in the Satsang movement, this is exactly what is being done
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[...]
Answering questions can be a catalyst deeper understanding,
to bring light to unexplored perspectives and nuances.
But, at least in the case of CC, which is held to be purely due to a
mechanical process of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 4:59 AM, t3rinity wrote:
From what I know, and what I have seen
in the Satsang movement, this is exactly what is being done
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff no_reply@
wrote:
[...]
Answering questions can be a catalyst deeper understanding,
to bring light to unexplored perspectives and nuances.
But, at least in
On Apr 9, 2006, at 2:09 PM, anon_couscous_ff wrote:
Does your reason for reference to a space and time starting point
because you experience a source of knowldge in that? If so, it makes
some sense from my experince, though your words, to me do not clearly
get to that point. I used to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Questioners are at times cast as snakes or as being jealous of not
having any experience, etc. It seems that if the experience is true,
and the interpretation of it is strong, any and all questions would
be
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer fairfieldlife@
wrote:
on 4/8/06 9:46 PM, anon_couscous_ff at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
But all this vers from my main point: why the prohibition and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 4:59 AM, t3rinity wrote:
From what I know, and what I have seen
in the Satsang movement, this is exactly what is being done there: The
truth of non-duality is being pointed out and explained in terms
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff
no_reply@ wrote:
It raises the question as to why the observations and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 2:09 PM, anon_couscous_ff wrote:
Does your reason for reference to a space and time starting point
because you experience a source of knowldge in that? If so, it makes
some sense from my experince,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff no_reply@
wrote:
But all this vers from my main point: why the prohibition and
extreme
reactions to simply asking questions about experiences.
By
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 4:59 AM, t3rinity wrote:
From what I know, and what
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff
no_reply@
wrote:
[...]
Answering questions can be a catalyst deeper understanding,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 4:59 AM, t3rinity wrote:
From what I know, and what I have seen
in the Satsang movement, this is exactly what is being done
On Apr 9, 2006, at 3:40 PM, t3rinity wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 4:59 AM, t3rinity wrote:
From what I know, and what I have seen
in the Satsang movement, this is exactly what is being done
there: The
truth of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff
no_reply@
wrote:
But all this vers from my main point: why the prohibition
and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff
no_reply@
On Apr 9, 2006, at 3:43 PM, anon_couscous_ff wrote:
I used the term exploding bindu points of knowledge -- quite
loosely, not formally having any traditional knowldge of bindus --
but it was a term that seemed to fit. Do you have links (beyond what
I can find in a google search) the well
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff no_reply@
wrote:
First, he did find consistent physiological differences between
TMers who reported 24/7 witnessing and those who didn't does not
establish
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff
no_reply@
[...]
Not very selective. But you do answer questions, or respond to
On Apr 9, 2006, at 4:00 PM, anon_couscous_ff wrote:
I don't know about that. In the Satsangs that I observered, nobody
stands there saying: 'I am enlightened and you are not' I indeed
have
never heard of this.
I don't see Vaj stating that. You maybe are reading into his post
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff
no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff
no_reply@
wrote:
First, he did find consistent physiological differences
between
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff
no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff
no_reply@
[...]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff
no_reply@ wrote:
Its too bad straight forward questions can't be asked and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff no_reply@
wrote:
But some in the neo-satsong crowd disgard this is non-sense, you
expect too much, let go of your expectations, MMY is wrong,
there are 100
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff
no_reply@ wrote:
All of your references and observations above, bindu hot spots, etc,
have to do with the active intellect, the intellect in motion,
problem
Comment below:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
**SNIP**
MMY's simple test for someone in Brahman Chetana is: can they float?
Yes, thats an interesting one. I have heard him
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff
no_reply@ wrote:
All of your references and observations above, bindu hot spots,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 4:59 AM, t3rinity wrote:
From what I know, and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
snip
I was investigating the Satsang movement in the context of its
historic origin,
which is good to do
while you mix it with Zen Buddhism
On Apr 9, 2006, at 3:32 PM, sparaig wrote:
Paraphrasing what the official stance in the TMO is about claiming
enlightenment:
People may say liar and be turned off to TM because they believe you
are lying.
People may look at you and say Who wants to be like that? and stop
meditating
On Apr 9, 2006, at 3:49 PM, sparaig wrote:
MMY's simple test for someone in Brahman Chetana is: can they float?
Since CC is associated with yoga/samkhya-darshana and Patanjali's
yoga-sutra why would they not be able to float having achieved
turiyatita (CC)?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 3:32 PM, sparaig wrote:
Paraphrasing what the official stance in the TMO is about claiming
enlightenment:
People may say liar and be turned off to TM because they
believe you
are lying.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 3:49 PM, sparaig wrote:
MMY's simple test for someone in Brahman Chetana is: can they
float?
Since CC is associated with yoga/samkhya-darshana and Patanjali's
yoga-sutra why would they not be
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff no_reply@
wrote:
I don't know about that. In the Satsangs that I observered, nobody
stands there saying: 'I am enlightened and you are not' I indeed
have
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 3:32 PM, sparaig wrote:
Paraphrasing what the official stance in the TMO is about claiming
enlightenment:
People may say liar and be turned off to TM because they believe you
are lying.
People
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 3:49 PM, sparaig wrote:
MMY's simple test for someone in Brahman Chetana is: can they float?
Since CC is associated with yoga/samkhya-darshana and Patanjali's
yoga-sutra why would they not be able
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 3:32 PM, sparaig wrote:
Paraphrasing what the official stance in the TMO is about
claiming
enlightenment:
People
On Apr 9, 2006, at 7:41 PM, anon_couscous_ff wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 3:49 PM, sparaig wrote:
MMY's simple test for someone in Brahman Chetana is: can they
float?
Since CC is associated with
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 3:49 PM, sparaig wrote:
MMY's simple test for someone in Brahman Chetana is: can they
float?
Since CC is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 3:32 PM, sparaig wrote:
Paraphrasing what the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 7:41 PM, anon_couscous_ff wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 3:49 PM, sparaig wrote:
MMY's simple test for someone in Brahman Chetana
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 3:49 PM, sparaig wrote:
MMY's simple test for
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff
no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 7:48 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 7:41 PM, anon_couscous_ff wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 3:49 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff
no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff
no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 7:48 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 7:41 PM, anon_couscous_ff wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff
no_reply@ wrote:
As i said previously, the breaking of IT into infinite flow of
time,
and infinte increments of space is the core delusion of an
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
snip
I was investigating the Satsang movement in the context of its
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff
no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
OK. Maybe I am not following all the thread. Small and perhaps
unimportant point, but I still didnt see Vaj saying that in satsangs
he has heard people say I am enlightened and you are not.
I didn't actually say
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 3:40 PM, t3rinity wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 4:59 AM, t3rinity wrote:
From what I know, and what I have seen
in the Satsang
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 3:49 PM, sparaig wrote:
MMY's simple test for someone in Brahman Chetana is: can they
float?
Since CC is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
snip
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 3:49 PM, sparaig wrote:
MMY's simple test for
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 7:48 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Apr 9, 2006, at 7:41 PM, anon_couscous_ff wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff no_reply@
wrote:
OK. Maybe I am not following all the thread. Small and perhaps
unimportant point, but I still didnt see Vaj saying that in satsangs
he has
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff
no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff
no_reply@
wrote:
---
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff
no_reply@
wrote:
---
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anon_couscous_ff
no_reply@
wrote:
---
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@
wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
snip
If you ever watch the videos of the early days of the yogic
flying olympics, the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@
wrote:
snip
If you
On Apr 8, 2006, at 1:50 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
What is the difference between so called life and so called death?
We don't go away- our essential nature, our consciousness remains,
so what difference is it if the consciousness is in the living room
or the dining room or the bedroom? Is it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 8, 2006, at 1:50 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
What is the difference between so called life and so called
death?
We don't go away- our essential nature, our consciousness
remains,
so what difference is it if the
On Apr 8, 2006, at 2:19 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
Yep- that all makes sense. The one thing we should establish in this
life is groundedness, centeredness, identification with the Self,
the cosmos, Brahman. Just makes the rest of it manageable, and much
more interesting. Otherwise we just as
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 8, 2006, at 2:19 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
Yep- that all makes sense. The one thing we should establish in
this
life is groundedness, centeredness, identification with the Self,
the cosmos, Brahman. Just makes the
On Apr 8, 2006, at 4:29 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 8, 2006, at 2:19 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
Yep- that all makes sense. The one thing we should establish in
this
life is groundedness, centeredness,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 8, 2006, at 4:29 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Apr 8, 2006, at 2:19 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
Yep- that all makes sense. The one thing we should
on 4/8/06 4:39 PM, jim_flanegin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 8, 2006, at 4:29 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
Good luck with that.
your cynicism is
On Apr 8, 2006, at 6:08 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
on 4/8/06 4:39 PM, jim_flanegin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 8, 2006, at 4:29 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 8, 2006, at 2:19 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
Yep- that all makes sense. The one thing we should establish in this
life is groundedness, centeredness, identification with the Self,
the cosmos, Brahman. Just makes the
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
