Adding two new committers to Apache Druid (incubating)

Apache Druid (incubating) PMC voted to accept two new committers: Fokko Driesprong ( https://mail-search.apache.org/pmc/private-arch/druid-private/201909.mbox/%3CCAAMLo%3Da-zYUdQdfvAKX7F-DnO%3Do0uySmwfyjmd6gfaRC-W4Q%2Bw%40mail.gmail.com%3E) and Furkan Kamaci ( https://mail-search.apache.org/pmc

Re: Inviting new committers to a podling

Hi, Two small additions to Dave's list: On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 3:40 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > (1) Discuss, propose and approve on private@. Provide permalink to threads on > whimsy. > (2) In case of PPMC then ACK to IPMC. > (3) Invite individual to role using email

Re: Inviting new committers to a podling

il.com> wrote: > > Hi Roman, > > Thanks for the feedback. > >>> On May 1, 2018, at 3:23 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: >>> >>> 3. It is not obvious what the policy is for a podling to invite new >>> committers and

Re: Inviting new committers to a podling

Hi Roman, Thanks for the feedback. > On May 1, 2018, at 3:23 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: > >> 3. It is not obvious what the policy is for a podling to invite new >> committers and PPMC members. I don't believe it should be the responsibility >

Re: Inviting new committers to a podling

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Craig Russell <apache@gmail.com> wrote: > I would respectfully suggest that the PPMC guide section that describes how > to invite new committers and PPMC members is not adequate to the task. > > This is what I think is the relevant s

Re: Inviting new committers to a podling

Section: Adding new committers Section: Voting in a new PPMC member We have followed this process for some recent members we added to OpenWhisk. For PPMC members: We held a vote on ppmc private, give the minimum 72 hours for the vote, and close the vote when there are 3 or more votes. But we don't

Inviting new committers to a podling

I would respectfully suggest that the PPMC guide section that describes how to invite new committers and PPMC members is not adequate to the task. This is what I think is the relevant section of https://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html : There are no ASF wide rules on how to decide when

Re: PPMC voting new committers

consensus. Hen On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Craig Russell <apache@gmail.com> wrote: > I'd like to see a change in incubator policy w.r.t. voting new committers. > > While there are no Foundation policies on how to vote new committers, we > do have best practices

Re: PPMC voting new committers

gt; (within the foundation policy and doctrine of course). > > Not sure how to reconcile these two aspects. > > Thanks, > Roman. > > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Craig Russell <apache@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I'd like to see a change in incubator policy w.r.t. vo

Re: PPMC voting new committers

icy w.r.t. voting new committers. > > While there are no Foundation policies on how to vote new committers, we do > have best practices documented in > http://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html that explicitly calls for > consensus approval of at least three positive votes and

Re: PPMC voting new committers

Hi It sounds good to me. It's a good idea. Regards JB On Nov 3, 2017, 18:34, at 18:34, Craig Russell <apache@gmail.com> wrote: >I'd like to see a change in incubator policy w.r.t. voting new >committers. > >While there are no Foundation policies on how to vote new commi

PPMC voting new committers

I'd like to see a change in incubator policy w.r.t. voting new committers. While there are no Foundation policies on how to vote new committers, we do have best practices documented in http://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html that explicitly calls for consensus approval of at least three

Re: New Committers not showing up on people.a.o

Last time I had to figure this out, this link was the key: http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#SVNaccess On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:23 PM, P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@gmail.com wrote: We (Storm) have added a few committers/PPMC members, but they aren’t listed under the project on

Re: New Committers not showing up on people.a.o

From what I recall, the information in people.a.o is generated from FOAF files, which are committed to a repo. See [1] for details. ap [1] http://people.apache.org/foaf/index.html

Re: New Committers not showing up on people.a.o

On 11 September 2014 23:06, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: Last time I had to figure this out, this link was the key: http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#SVNaccess LDAP is not used for Incubator podling members. Podling groups are defined in the asf-authorization file. I just

Re: New Committers not showing up on people.a.o

On 12 September 2014 00:12, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 11 September 2014 23:06, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote: Last time I had to figure this out, this link was the key: http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#SVNaccess LDAP is not used for Incubator podling members. That page is

Re: New Committers not showing up on people.a.o

Thanks Ted, Andrew, and sebb, FOAF files were one of first thing I checked, but I don't have a FOAF file, yet I (ptgoetz) am still listed as a member of Storm on p.a.o. I can confirm that some of the new members have commit rights to our git repo, but still aren't listed as members on p.a.o.

Re: New Committers not showing up on people.a.o

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 7:31 PM, P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Ted, Andrew, and sebb, FOAF files were one of first thing I checked, but I don't have a FOAF file, yet I (ptgoetz) am still listed as a member of Storm on p.a.o. I can confirm that some of the new members have

Re: Policy for new committers to podlings

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: I'm embarrassed to report that I'm feeling a bit foggy on the new committer policy, and a quick tour with google failed to find it on a web page. We're long on pages about initial podling setup, and not so long on

Re: Policy for new committers to podlings

On Friday, May 18, 2012 2:03:39 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: I'm embarrassed to report that I'm feeling a bit foggy on the new committer policy, and a quick tour with google failed to find it on a web page. We're long on pages about initial podling setup, and not so long

Re: Policy for new committers to podlings

Yes, thank you both. Every so often maxwel's daemon sends all the google results to the wrong side of the internet for me. On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Billie J Rinaldi billie.j.rina...@ugov.gov wrote: On Friday, May 18, 2012 2:03:39 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: I'm

Re: Keeping an eye out for new committers

...@apache.org To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: Alan Gates ga...@hortonworks.com; Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 10:42 AM Subject: Re: Keeping an eye out for new committers On Friday, March 16, 2012 04:28:06 PM Alan Gates wrote: With my mentor hat

Re: Keeping an eye out for new committers

...@gmail.com Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 10:42 AM Subject: Re: Keeping an eye out for new committers On Friday, March 16, 2012 04:28:06 PM Alan Gates wrote: With my mentor hat on, this is a poke to remind you (the PPMC) that it's your job to be on the lookout for contributors that may be ready

Re: Keeping an eye out for new committers

- From: Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: Alan Gates ga...@hortonworks.com; Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 10:42 AM Subject: Re: Keeping an eye out for new committers On Friday, March 16, 2012 04:28:06 PM Alan Gates wrote

Keeping an eye out for new committers

Below is a generalized edition of an email I sent to the PPMC of one of the projects I mentor (HCatalog). Jukka asked me to send it on to general@. Hopefully you will find it useful. Alan. With my mentor hat on, this is a poke to remind you (the PPMC) that it's your job to be on the lookout

Re: Keeping an eye out for new committers

These look good and are a decent complement to http://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html If you have the time would you mind adding your notes there (all committers have write access to the ComDev site via the ASF CMS) Ross On 16 March 2012 23:28, Alan Gates ga...@hortonworks.com wrote:

Re: Keeping an eye out for new committers

Alan Gates wrote on Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 16:28:06 -0700: One good way to find what patches a contributor has done is to look over the contributor report from JIRA. You can get this by going to your project's JIRA, and under the reports drop down on the right side, click on Contribution

Re: Keeping an eye out for new committers

On Friday, March 16, 2012 04:28:06 PM Alan Gates wrote: With my mentor hat on, this is a poke to remind you (the PPMC) that it's your job to be on the lookout for contributors that may be ready to become committers. I look for several things when I consider making someone a committer: 1)

Re: Keeping an eye out for new committers

@incubator.apache.org Cc: Alan Gates ga...@hortonworks.com; Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 10:42 AM Subject: Re: Keeping an eye out for new committers On Friday, March 16, 2012 04:28:06 PM Alan Gates wrote: With my mentor hat on, this is a poke to remind you

Re: Establishing New Committers

On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: You might consider this nit-picking but it might also be important at some point in the future. You use the phrase committ rights in this template. They are not rights they are privileges. The reason this might be

Re: Establishing New Committers

On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: You use the phrase committ rights in this template. They are not rights they are privileges. The reason this might be important is that very occasionally it is necessary for a PMC to remove these privileges, it is

Re: Establishing New Committers

On 7 November 2011 14:11, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: ... That being said, thank you for improving this template, I've added your enhancements to the original template over at ComDev (along with the

Re: Establishing New Committers

You might consider this nit-picking but it might also be important at some point in the future. You use the phrase committ rights in this template. They are not rights they are privileges. The reason this might be important is that very occasionally it is necessary for a PMC to remove these

Establishing New Committers

Here's a Form letter that I have been evolving. It has been used in recent invitations from the Apache OpenOffice.org Podling where an iCLA is already on file. You are welcome to try this. There are additional places to be customized for use by a different podling. I have added brackets

RE: Establishing New Committers

Here's a modification of the letter that I have been evolving. It has been used in recent invitations from the Apache OpenOffice.org Podling where no iCLA is on file. You are welcome to try this. There are additional places to be customized for use by a different podling. I have added

Re: Establishing New Committers

Hi Dennis, I'd update item 3 below On Nov 3, 2011, at 5:21 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: 3. When you transmit the completed iCLA, indicate that you are to be a committer and PPMC member of the Apache [OOo podling]. This will allow the Secretary to notify the PPMC when your iCLA has

new committers

root notified us of a raft of new committers. Is someone in stock with karma to grant karma? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: new committers

Done. Craig On Sep 1, 2010, at 4:50 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: root notified us of a raft of new committers. Is someone in stock with karma to grant karma? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org

Re: new committers

Thanks, sorry about the out-of-order email responses. On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@oracle.com wrote: Done. Craig On Sep 1, 2010, at 4:50 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: root notified us of a raft of new committers. Is someone in stock with karma to grant karma

Re: new committers

Generally the mentors will do this for their respective podlings. On 02/09/2010, at 9:50 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: root notified us of a raft of new committers. Is someone in stock with karma to grant karma

Re: new committers

: Generally the mentors will do this for their respective podlings. On 02/09/2010, at 9:50 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: root notified us of a raft of new committers. Is someone in stock with karma to grant karma

Re: new committers

On 02/09/2010, at 11:37 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: The site says that only the PMC chair, the ex-PMC chairs, and a shadowy underground of unnamed other individuals have access to grant commit karma ... not arbitrary mentors. The site couldn't possibly be inaccurate, could it? It's correct

Re: new committers

Leaving my snarky remark aside, I can now analyze the disconnect in question. I misinterpreted you as meaning that *any* mentor should be able to do it, not that projects generally have at least one mentor who can. In my defense, I read the tone of that web page as suggesting that the people with

Re: new committers

Hi Benson, On Sep 1, 2010, at 7:38 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: Leaving my snarky remark aside, I can now analyze the disconnect in question. I misinterpreted you as meaning that *any* mentor should be able to do it, not that projects generally have at least one mentor who can. In my defense, I

Re: new committers

it? The site is correct. Officers have karma, not arbitrary others. Craig On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote: Generally the mentors will do this for their respective podlings. On 02/09/2010, at 9:50 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: root notified us of a raft of new

Re: New committers

On Apr 28, 2009, at 9:14 AM, Curt Arnold wrote: Good to see some new faces, but I'm curious about how it happened. I don't recall any discussion or votes and I didn't request new accounts or make changes to the SVN authorization file. Christian Grobmeier, as you said, was an obvious

Re: New committers

On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: On Apr 28, 2009, at 9:14 AM, Curt Arnold wrote: Good to see some new faces, but I'm curious about how it happened.  I don't recall any discussion or votes and I didn't request new accounts or make changes to the SVN

Re: New committers

Christian Grobmeier, as you said, was an obvious choice and wanted commit. He already had an account and his iCLA was on file, so I added him to the commit list for log4php. I also support this decision. Sometimes it is necessary to be flexible to get moving again... Even when the kind of

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Tuesday 05 June 2007 07:48, Craig L Russell wrote: Hi Niclas, There is one issue that still bothers me about your proposed ways of voting. At some point, the nominee has to be asked, and accept, to become a committer. This would have to be after the private votes

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

Richard S. Hall wrote: Niclas Hedhman wrote: I don't know all the communities around ASF, but what I have seen is that the acceptance/decline happens after the public vote. Entries to PMCs seems more like private vote - accept/decline - welcome in the communities I know of. Mind you, my

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

generally don't track podlings closely. So it's difficult to get incubator PMC members to vote for new committers. But incubator PMC members should be very good at looking at PPMC processes and voting based on the PPMC vote process. Personally, if I saw a vote on the incubator private PMC list for a new

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

On Tuesday 05 June 2007 07:48, Craig L Russell wrote: Hi Niclas, There is one issue that still bothers me about your proposed ways of voting. At some point, the nominee has to be asked, and accept, to become a committer. This would have to be after the private votes are done and before the

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

Hi Niclas, On Jun 4, 2007, at 6:04 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Tuesday 05 June 2007 07:48, Craig L Russell wrote: Hi Niclas, There is one issue that still bothers me about your proposed ways of voting. At some point, the nominee has to be asked, and accept, to become a committer. This would

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

Thanks Craig. Some suggestions/comments: On May 31, 2007, at 7:56 AM, Craig L Russell wrote: Voting in a new committer If a developer has contributed a significant number of high-quality patches, is interested in continuing the contribution, and has demonstrated the ability to work well

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

Craig L Russell wrote: Hi Martin, On May 30, 2007, at 11:07 AM, Martin Sebor wrote: Craig L Russell wrote: [...] So IMHO, best practice for podlings is to hold a [DISCUSS] Joe Bleau for committer on the PPMC private list, followed by a [VOTE] on the PPMC private list, and then a formal

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

Martin Sebor wrote: Craig L Russell wrote: How could a PPMC participate in a vote on the Incubator PMC's private list? It cannot, and I don't believe I implied that this would be the case. The idea is that the PPMC, with the help of the Mentors, conducts a discussion and a vote just as

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

Hi Bill, Thanks for clarifying your position. This is a bit of a surprise, since I thought I was just elaborating existing practice as documented in the ppmc guide. The section in question had been in the guides/ppmc for as long as I've been at Apache, and I missed any dialog regarding

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

On 5/30/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Carl Trieloff wrote: One more question on this topic as I have also seen differing views from different members of the Incubator PMC on: Who can and who can not send the account setup mail to root? The view that counts is from

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

I'd like to discuss one detail of the process for new committers. On May 30, 2007, at 10:56 PM, Craig L Russell wrote: If the nominee is already an Apache committer on another project, the proposer asks the incubator PMC chair to update the authorization file to include the nominee

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

Craig L Russell wrote: o The podling's developer list, with notice posted to the Incubator general list. The notice is a separate email forwarding the vote email with a cover statement that this vote is underway on the podling's developer list. This is a good approach if you are sure of

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

Craig L Russell wrote: [...] So IMHO, best practice for podlings is to hold a [DISCUSS] Joe Bleau for committer on the PPMC private list, followed by a [VOTE] on the PPMC private list, and then a formal [VOTE] on the private incubator PMC list with references to the discussion and vote of the

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

Hi Bill, On May 30, 2007, at 11:37 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Craig L Russell wrote: o The podling's developer list, with notice posted to the Incubator general list. The notice is a separate email forwarding the vote email with a cover statement that this vote is underway on the

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

Hi Martin, On May 30, 2007, at 11:07 AM, Martin Sebor wrote: Craig L Russell wrote: [...] So IMHO, best practice for podlings is to hold a [DISCUSS] Joe Bleau for committer on the PPMC private list, followed by a [VOTE] on the PPMC private list, and then a formal [VOTE] on the private

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

Craig L Russell wrote: Hi Bill, On May 30, 2007, at 11:37 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Craig L Russell wrote: o The podling's developer list, with notice posted to the Incubator general list. The notice is a separate email forwarding the vote email with a cover statement that this

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

As this seems to be an evolving Best Practice, I don't know that when started a vote recently on two new committers for CXF that all of this was apparent to me at the time. The current documentation at least http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html seems to indicate that we just need a net

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

Speaking of being unnecessarily hostile and confrontational, thanks for bagging Jakarta. FWIW, The most recent Jakarta committer votes have been conducted in private, and what you describe is not a current Jakarta practice. Where are Noel's comments about bad Jakarta practice? I had a quick

PPMC guidance on new committers

Having seen this identical discussion at least half a dozen times, I've committed changes to the guides/ppmc document removing the distracting (P) from the discussion on new committers. The new text says Only votes cast by Incubator PMC members are binding. If the vote is positive

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

closely. So it's difficult to get incubator PMC members to vote for new committers. But incubator PMC members should be very good at looking at PPMC processes and voting based on the PPMC vote process. Personally, if I saw a vote on the incubator private PMC list for a new committer on a podling

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

. The reason is that PPMC votes have no legal status. And incubator PMC members generally don't track podlings closely. So it's difficult to get incubator PMC members to vote for new committers. But incubator PMC members should be very good at looking at PPMC processes and voting based on the PPMC

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

seem to me that it could be send by anyone. Carl. Craig L Russell wrote: Having seen this identical discussion at least half a dozen times, I've committed changes to the guides/ppmc document removing the distracting (P) from the discussion on new committers. The new text says Only votes

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

is that PPMC votes have no legal status. And incubator PMC members generally don't track podlings closely. So it's difficult to get incubator PMC members to vote for new committers. But incubator PMC members should be very good at looking at PPMC processes and voting based on the PPMC vote process

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

members generally don't track podlings closely. So it's difficult to get incubator PMC members to vote for new committers. But incubator PMC members should be very good at looking at PPMC processes and voting based on the PPMC vote process. Personally, if I saw a vote on the incubator

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

On 5/30/07, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: behind this practice. If the mail to root has to be cc-ed to general list and PPMC and has 3 PMC votes on it then it would seem to me that it could be send by anyone. I can only think of one reason: [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not accessible to PPMC

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

Hi, On 5/30/07, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Personally, if I saw a vote on the incubator private PMC list for a new committer on a podling, including references to the PPMC discussion and vote, I would be inclined to vote for that committer. On the other hand, if I saw a vote on

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

the distracting (P) from the discussion on new committers. The new text says Only votes cast by Incubator PMC members are binding. If the vote is positive, and the contributor accepts the responsibility of a committer for the project, the contributor formally becomes an Apache committer. An Incubator

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

Craig L Russell wrote: Hi Carl, On May 30, 2007, at 6:14 AM, Carl Trieloff wrote: One more question on this topic as I have also seen differing views from different members of the Incubator PMC on: Who can and who can not send the account setup mail to root? Given each new committer vote

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

what I'm proposing allows incubator PMC members to perform due diligence if they want to, or simply provide oversight of the PPMC's actions on new committers. Craig Yoav - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

on requests for commit access for podlings. So what I'm proposing allows incubator PMC members to perform due diligence if they want to, or simply provide oversight of the PPMC's actions on new committers. Craig Yoav

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

this identical discussion at least half a dozen times, I've committed changes to the guides/ppmc document removing the distracting (P) from the discussion on new committers. The new text says Only votes cast by Incubator PMC members are binding. If the vote is positive, and the contributor

RE: PPMC guidance on new committers

Craig Russell wrote: I'd like to open the discussion on the best practice referred to by the guides/ppmc because I'm not convinced that best practice for a TLP is best practice for the incubator. Personally, if I saw a vote on the incubator private PMC list for a new committer on a podling,

RE: PPMC guidance on new committers

Carl Trieloff wrote: One more question on this topic as I have also seen differing views from different members of the Incubator PMC on: Who can and who can not send the account setup mail to root? The view that counts is from http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#newcommitter. Please note:

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

On May 30, 2007, at 10:00 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Craig Russell wrote: I'd like to open the discussion on the best practice referred to by the guides/ppmc because I'm not convinced that best practice for a TLP is best practice for the incubator. Personally, if I saw a vote on the

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

changes to the guides/ppmc document removing the distracting (P) from the discussion on new committers. The new text says Only votes cast by Incubator PMC members are binding. If the vote is positive, and the contributor accepts the responsibility of a committer for the project, the contributor

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

Craig L Russell wrote: Hi Jean, On May 30, 2007, at 8:11 AM, Jean T. Anderson wrote: Craig L Russell wrote: Hi Carl, On May 30, 2007, at 6:14 AM, Carl Trieloff wrote: One more question on this topic as I have also seen differing views from different members of the Incubator PMC on:

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

Here's what I'd like to do with the ppmc guide. Change: Voting in a new committer If a developer has contributed a significant number of high-quality patches, is interested in continuing the contribution, and has demonstrated the ability to work well with others under the Apache

Re: Adding new committers process

Noel, It has been a while since I posted this and the conversation has gone cold. I'd like to get some consensus on what the PPMC's role is so that we can update the documentation. See embedded comments below. On 11/04/07, Martin Ritchie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/04/07, Noel J. Bergman

RE: Adding new committers process

Martin Ritchie wrote: I'd like to get some consensus on what the PPMC's role is so that we can update the documentation. On 11/04/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The PPMC has no standing within the ASF. It is a useful structure for the Incubator, but the only binding votes

RE: Adding new committers process

to see the IPMC private list given over to voting in new committers on podlings. That would make, IMO that list pretty unusable. My take on Noel's comments is that the podling should ensure that it has got 3 +1s from IPMC members. Correct. IMO, a notice of the vote to private@ isn't a bad idea

Re: Adding new committers process

. Agreed. I don't personally want to see the IPMC private list given over to voting in new committers on podlings. That would make, IMO that list pretty unusable. My take on Noel's comments is that the podling should ensure that it has got 3 +1s from IPMC members. Correct. IMO

RE: Adding new committers process

Carl Trieloff wrote: A suggestion that one of our mentors had made to us was to do a poll for concerns on the private list to see if PPMC was happy with the committer to be added to the project (notice and to see if any of PPMC have concerns). If all went well on the PPMC list, the

Re: Adding new committers process

Noel J. Bergman wrote: Carl Trieloff wrote: A suggestion that one of our mentors had made to us was to do a poll for concerns on the private list to see if PPMC was happy with the committer to be added to the project (notice and to see if any of PPMC have concerns). If all went well on

Re: Adding new committers process

On 11/04/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cliff Schmidt wrote: 1. Only IPMC members (e.g. mentors) should send root requests for new podling committers. 2. A podling committer vote requires three IPMC +1s to be approved (ideally the mentors, assuming the project still has

Re: Adding new committers process

On 4/6/07, Martin Ritchie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, I think that has cleared things up a bit for me I'll send out these requests that I've been sitting on for a few weeks now as we need to get the accounts set up for our new committers. Just as it appeared this subject was cleared up, Noel

Re: Adding new committers process

Ok, I think that has cleared things up a bit for me I'll send out these requests that I've been sitting on for a few weeks now as we need to get the accounts set up for our new committers. Cheers On 04/04/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jean T. Anderson wrote: huh

Re: Adding new committers process

On 29/03/07, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/29/07, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Robert, From my reading of the incubator PPMC guide, the guide only talks about the process up to the point where the PPMC votes to offer commit privileges to a new member.

Re: Adding new committers process

Martin Ritchie wrote: Thanks for this discussion. So just to clarify, anyone on the PPMC can request the account/karma setup just the IPMC needs to be CC'd as well as the usual PPMC on the root email. infra only acknowledges requests from the PMC chair (iPMC chair in this case). For

Re: Adding new committers process

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Martin Ritchie wrote: Thanks for this discussion. So just to clarify, anyone on the PPMC can request the account/karma setup just the IPMC needs to be CC'd as well as the usual PPMC on the root email. infra only acknowledges requests from the PMC chair (iPMC

Re: Adding new committers process

On Apr 4, 2007, at 10:03 AM, Jean T. Anderson wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Martin Ritchie wrote: Thanks for this discussion. So just to clarify, anyone on the PPMC can request the account/karma setup just the IPMC needs to be CC'd as well as the usual PPMC on the root email.

Re: Adding new committers process

Jean T. Anderson wrote: huh? The instructions [1] say The project PMC needs to send an email to root. It doesn't say the project PMC chair. Since root can easily verify pmc members from committee-info.txt [2], I don't see why any member of the PMC cannot submit the request. Whoops :) The

Re: Adding new committers process

On 3/29/07, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Robert, From my reading of the incubator PPMC guide, the guide only talks about the process up to the point where the PPMC votes to offer commit privileges to a new member. It then links to the PMC document that Martin refers to. now

  1   2   >