; needed.
The Java package name hopefully won't need to be changed either ...
> Karl
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:17 PM, sebb wrote:
>> It's quite difficult finding the resources for the Manifold Connector
>> Framework.
>>
>> The Incubator
On 6 January 2011 20:41, Karl Wright wrote:
> The failure to build occurs because the directory it is complaining
> about doesn't seem to exist after the zip is unpacked. The directory
> is empty at the time of the build. It's not clear whether the problem
> is the built zip itself or the way yo
Just noticed that there are a lot of source files without AL headers.
The RAT tool can detect these for you.
Also, there should normally be a DISCLAIMER file at the top-level of
archives and SVN trees.
It's simpler to have this in a separate file, which can then just be
deleted upon graduation.
xcluded by the Ant target.
BTW some of the .cs files appear to have BOM markers - not sure
whether that is intentional.
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 4:03 PM, sebb wrote:
>> Just noticed that there are a lot of source files without AL headers.
>> The RAT tool can detect these for you.
>
tries in NOTICE or LICENSE.
Probably best to re-check the Tomcat sources, and if there is no
header, ask why on the Tomcat list.
> Karl
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 6:26 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 6 January 2011 22:38, Karl Wright wrote:
>>> We've been using the RAT too
Note: the NOTICE year will need to be changed for the next release to 2010-2011.
For the current release I think it can remain as is - there don't seem
to have been any substantive changes made in 2011.
The leading blank lines need to be removed.
Otherwise, I concur with what Ant has mentioned el
On 8 January 2011 16:40, Karl Wright wrote:
> I've attached a new proposed version of README.txt, NOTICE.TXT, and
> LICENSE.txt. Any further comments?
As previously mentioned, all the files appear to have leading blank lines.
These should be removed.
The README file says:
"Apache ManifoldCF is
t; In short, I don't think there is any point in further changes.
I still think the binary archive is unnecessarily bloated, and will
cause wasted load and resources for mirrors and consumers.
> Thanks,
> Karl
>
> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 8:48 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 8 January 2
On 9 January 2011 08:14, Karl Wright wrote:
>> I still think the binary archive is unnecessarily bloated, and will
>> cause wasted load and resources for mirrors and consumers.
>>
>
> If it were straightforward, I would already have done it.
>
> Here's a rundown of the space usage in the dist dire
I've just noticed that there are lots of jars stored in SVN under
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/branches/release-0.1-branch
AIUI, SVN should not be used for storing library jars.
==
The way other projects manage this is to define the jar dependencies
in a build file, and get the
On 22 January 2011 07:34, Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We (empire-db) just set up our DOAP file but we still have an issue.
>
> http://projects.apache.org/indexes/alpha.html#E
>
> The projects overview points to:
> http://projects.apache.org/projects/empire-db__incubating_.html
>
> But t
On 3 March 2011 03:19, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Hmmm,
>
> I'd like to question this: why would the Incubator ever delete archives of
> releases? We have active links on the TLP for e.g., OODT and for e.g., Tika
> that point users to our Incubator releases that are still active Incubator
On 9 March 2011 16:40, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The Apache Gora community has approved the 0.1-incubating release.
> This will be Apache Gora's first release since coming to the Incubator.
> We have three +1's IPMC binding votes so we ready to release, any
> input is appreciated.
>
> Thr
On 14 March 2011 06:05, Adelita Padilla wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> The Apache NPanday community has approved the 1.3-incubating release and we
> are now looking for the approval of the IPMC to publish the release.
>
> These are the major changes included in this release:
>
> * Visual Studio 2010 and .N
On 15 March 2011 03:27, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> On 14/03/2011, at 10:49 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 14 March 2011 06:05, Adelita Padilla wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The Apache NPanday community has approved the 1.3-incubating release
On 15 March 2011 11:22, Adelita Padilla wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:05 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> On 15 March 2011 03:27, Brett Porter wrote:
>> >
>> > On 14/03/2011, at 10:49 PM, sebb wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 14 Ma
On 16 March 2011 09:40, Troy Howard wrote:
> Regarding:
>> I cannot read the tar.gz files with my normal tools (hexdump shows
>> that they are in RAR format), and the hashes have got spurious lines
>> in them which break automated checkers.
>
> Looks like you guys are a) building the release packa
On 17 March 2011 22:59, Andrei Savu wrote:
> This is the first incubator release for Apache Whirr, version
> 0.4.0-incubating.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=1230&version=12316065
>
> *** Please download, test and vote by
On 18 March 2011 16:43, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2011-03-18, sebb wrote:
>
>> But the main issue is that the binary distribution contains lots of
>> 3rd party products which are not mentioned in either the NOTICE file
>> or the LICENSE file.
>
> They li
On 18 March 2011 22:02, Tom White wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:30 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 18 March 2011 16:43, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>>> On 2011-03-18, sebb wrote:
>>>
>>>> But the main issue is that the binary distribution contains lots of
>>
On 19 March 2011 03:09, Henry Saputra wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> The Apache Gora community has approved the 0.1-incubating-rc3 release.
> This will be Apache Gora's first release since coming to the Incubator.
>
> Thread about VOTE result:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-gora-dev/20
On 19 March 2011 18:48, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Thanks Sebb.
>
> Do you see the below as "fix in 0.2-incubating" or "fix now"?
>
> To me they are "fix in 0.2-incubating", but I'd appreciate your thoughts.
Well, if I were the RM, I&#
On 3 April 2011 23:40, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
> Subversion tag for release:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.2-RC2/
NOTICE.txt is non-standard; see
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/vcl/tags/release-2.2.1-RC2/NOTICE
for a conforming example.
There's no Incubation
On 7 April 2011 13:49, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
> Please review this again if you have time -
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/branches/0.2/
>
> - added "DISCLAIMER.txt" file
+1
The Hama website also needs to include the disclaimer (and apache
should be spelt Apache), and should in
On 7 April 2011 17:24, David Lutterkort wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just uploaded a release candidate for Deltacloud 0.3.0. The rc is
> available from http://people.apache.org/~lutter/deltacloud/0.3.0/rc1/
>
> Please vote on the release candidate by Monday, 2011-04-10 8:00 PDT
Where is the SVN tag for
On 7 April 2011 18:14, Donald Woods wrote:
> This is the third release of Apache Bean Validation.
>
> We have already received 4 binding IPMC votes during the PPMC voting
> below, so I'm requesting a 72 hour lazy consensus before releasing the
> artifacts.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Donald
>
> Origi
On 8 April 2011 06:42, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
> Hi IPMCers and Incubator community,
>
> The previous mentioned problems (e.g., license, notice, disclaimer,
> and website logo/text) are all fixed and I just created RC3. There'are
> only changes of text, no changes at the code level.
>
> Hama Website
On 3 May 2011 14:25, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Simo, I guess you are referring to:
> "Use iss...@commons.apache.org' for Jira change notification"
>
> I am +1
Likewise, +1
>
> Cheers
> Christian
>
>
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Simone Tripodi
> wrote:
>> Hi all guys,
>> do you
Specifically, here:
http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html#unlistedclas
but again I don't see your name
On 3 June 2011 01:59, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Philip,
>
> please check here - http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html
>
> I don't think i see your name there
>
> -- dims
>
> On
On 3 June 2011 02:44, Phillip Rhodes wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:00 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> Specifically, here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html#unlistedclas
>>
>> but again I don't see your name
>>
>>
> Actually, it i
On 3 June 2011 10:20, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:23 AM, Craig L Russell
> wrote:
>> Hi Sebb,
>>
>> These days we record exactly what is in the first line of the ICLA: Sidney
>> Phillip Rhodes. Both in the iclas.txt and the name of the document.
Yes
On 8 June 2011 07:47, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>> Can the people below be added to the incubator group so they can
>>> update the ONGL website? I have hear our inc-chair is ooo (wow, that
>>> acronym got somehow hijiacked in this list) - do we have a deputy
>>> handling it?
>>>
>>
>> Thirty-six
On 14 June 2011 19:39, Richard Frovarp wrote:
> On 06/14/2011 12:31 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:43:21PM -0500, Richard Frovarp wrote:
>>>
>>> Please vote on the release cndidate for Apache Droids Incubating,
>>> version 0.1-incubating. I've received one binding IPMC
On 12 June 2011 04:43, Richard Frovarp wrote:
> Please vote on the release cndidate for Apache Droids Incubating, version
> 0.1-incubating. I've received one binding IPMC +1 votes and 2 non-binding +1
> votes.
>
> PPMC release vote thread:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-droid
On 16 June 2011 17:29, Richard Frovarp wrote:
> On 06/15/2011 08:47 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> On 12 June 2011 04:43, Richard Frovarp wrote:
>>>
>>> Please vote on the release cndidate for Apache Droids Incubating, version
>>> 0.1-incubating. I've recei
On 18 June 2011 02:12, David Crossley wrote:
> Henri Yandell wrote:
>>
>> Also, is there a retired-podlings url that the Attic can link to?
>
> There is a default link generated from the section title.
>
> However i just created explicit links. So after rsync
> it will be:
>
> http://incubator.apa
On 22 June 2011 06:04, dan haywood wrote:
> This is the first release of Apache Isis (incubating).
> We have already received 3 binding IPMC votes during the PPMC voting
> [1,2], so I'm requesting a 72 hour lazy consensus before releasing
> the artifacts.
> Please vote now.
> [ ] +1
> [ ] 0
> [ ]
On 23 June 2011 10:37, Mark Struberg wrote:
>
> Hi Sebb!
>
> Txs for catching this!
>
> Just to make sure we are looking at the same source distribution. I took the
> one I reviewed from here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheisis-070/org
On 19 July 2011 01:10, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please vote on the RC3 for Apache Hama 0.3-Incubating. We've already
> received 2 binding IPMC +1 votes.
>
> Vote thread:
> http://markmail.org/thread/eaypivg3r5wdx36y
>
> Artifact and signatures:
> http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dis
On 16 August 2011 01:24, Craig L Russell wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> The referenced guide now contains this language:
>
> After root creates the new account, the new committer needs to added to both
> the committer-? section and the podling section of the
> file:https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/i
On 16 August 2011 04:07, Craig L Russell wrote:
> Hi Sebb,
>
> Please feel free to update the document as you see fit. CTR.
OK, I'll give that a try;
However not sure I have enough karma (I'll find out).
Turns out the incubator group is also set up by infra if the incubator
On 16 August 2011 12:25, sebb wrote:
> On 16 August 2011 04:07, Craig L Russell wrote:
>> Hi Sebb,
>>
>> Please feel free to update the document as you see fit. CTR.
>
> OK, I'll give that a try;
> However not sure I have enough karma (I'll find out).
On 17 August 2011 00:54, David Lutterkort wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just uploaded the second release candidate for Deltacloud 0.4.0. The rc is
> available from http://people.apache.org/~lutter/deltacloud/0.4.0/rc2/
Is there an SVN tag that corresponds with the release?
Also, what about the KEYS fil
On 15 August 2011 19:20, Richard Frovarp wrote:
> Please vote on the release candidate for Apache Droids Incubating, version
> 0.1-incubating. I've received one binding IPMC +1 votes and 4 non-binding +1
> votes.
>
> PPMC release vote thread:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-dr
The incubator LDAP unix group is used to allow podling committers to
update the incubator websites (the html files are owned by the
incubator group).
The group is supposed to be updated when new accounts are created
(Infra for new incubator accounts) or when existing committers are
added to a podl
On 17 August 2011 18:35, Richard Frovarp wrote:
> On 08/17/2011 10:41 AM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> On 15 August 2011 19:20, Richard Frovarp wrote:
>>>
>>> Please vote on the release candidate for Apache Droids Incubating,
>>> version
>>> 0.1-incubating
On 18 August 2011 01:29, David Lutterkort wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 04:32 +0100, sebb wrote:
>> On 17 August 2011 00:54, David Lutterkort wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I just uploaded the second release candidate for Deltacloud 0.4.0. The
On 14 August 2011 23:53, Ashutosh Chauhan wrote:
> Please disregard previous mail due to incorrect subject line.
>
> Hi all,
>
> HCatalog community is excited to share that RC for first release of
> HCatalog has been +1'd over at hcatalog-user@incubator Please try it
> out and vote for the Apache
What is the status of XML Beans C++ ?
It has a website [1], a status page [2] but is not mentioned in clutch
[3] or the summary projects page [4] as dormant or retired.
It still has a RW podling SVN directory [5] but that was last updated in 2007.
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/xmlbeanscxx/
[2]
nary
dependencies too?
BTW, I don't understand why you include an external to Hive source -
surely you can just depend on one of the Hive releases?
> Alan.
>
>
> On Aug 18, 2011, at 7:25 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 14 August 2011 23:53, Ashutosh Chauhan wrote:
>>>
On 19 August 2011 00:48, David Lutterkort wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 02:32 +0100, sebb wrote:
>> On 18 August 2011 01:29, David Lutterkort wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 04:32 +0100, sebb wrote:
>> >> On 17 August 2011 00:54, David Lutterkort wrote:
>>
On 18 August 2011 23:30, sebb wrote:
> On 18 August 2011 18:42, Alan Gates wrote:
>> Sebastian,
>>
>> Thanks for voting. I have a couple questions on your feedback. I didn't
>> follow what you were saying about having source in the archive and about
>
On 18 August 2011 23:48, Alan Gates wrote:
>
> On Aug 18, 2011, at 3:30 PM, sebb wrote:
>>>
>>
>> Yes, mostly.
>>
>> What about JUnit? The archive includes junit 3.8.1 (seems a bit old -
>> current version is 4.8.2)
>> Also Thrift-Facebook, whic
On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
> 0.1.0-incubating.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
>
> *** Please download,
to create the tar file?
It's clearly creating a file that confuses Winzip and Ant.
Maybe you can try using Ant to unpack the archive and see if you see
the same behaviour:
I'm using Ant 1.8.2 on WinXP
> Adding DISCLAIMER now.
>
> A.
>
> On Fri, Aug 1
ts - as far as I can tell, everything is under
>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in SVN, same
>>> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet being built/used,
>>> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If t
before release.
Why is this not a .txt file?
On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb wrote:
> On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer wrote:
>> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case, please find RC1
>> at http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/.
&
There are quite a few web-sites still under /www/incubator.apache.org/
that are for graduated podlings, as well as a few sites marked 'old':
For example:
467 ./old-activemq
130790 ./activemq
drwxrwsr-x 34 apbackup incubator 445 Feb 6 2007 activemq
drwxrwsr-x 5 apbackup incubator 2
AIUI, DISCLAIMER files (*) should be present alongside NOTICE and
LICENSE files in all releases and in the top-level SVN directory, and
the disclaimer text should be prominently displayed on the podling
web-site.
These items are easy to do, but are frequently overlooked, so I wonder
if the podling
Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get the files
>> missing headers today as well.
>>
>> A.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb wrote:
>>
>>> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following:
>>>
>>>
reads OK in Winzip and Ant.]
On 22 August 2011 01:56, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> Tag replaced.
>
> A.
>
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer wrote:
>> > New candidate up at
>> > http://people.apache.org/~abay
On 22 August 2011 16:56, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote:
>> Whoops. Sorry about that. New tag created -
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
>>
>> A.
>>
>>
ted -
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2
>
> A.
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:37 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> Tags are supposed to be immutable.
>>
>> For example, add an -RCn suffix which is removed (SVN copy or rename)
&
On 22 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> ...and I should add that I'm, again, +1 binding. =)
AIUI that's only binding as far as the Bigtop PPMC (podling PMC) is concerned.
You don't seem to be on the Incubator PMC, which is what is required
for binding votes on a release.
> A.
>
> On Mon,
On 22 August 2011 19:07, Andrew Bayer wrote:
> This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version
> 0.1.0-incubating.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420
>
> *** Please download,
Entries in podling juice not in incubator group:
amattheu,kwouters,nlevitt,raul,vdkoogh,wassa,werner
Could one of the PMC chairs please add them as follows:
$ modify_unix_group.pl incubator
-add=amattheu,kwouters,nlevitt,raul,vdkoogh,wassa,werner
Thanks
-
On 24 August 2011 00:21, David Lutterkort wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just uploaded the third release candidate for Deltacloud 0.4.0. The rc is
> available from http://people.apache.org/~lutter/deltacloud/0.4.0/rc3/
>
> Please vote on the release candidate by Friday, 2011-08-26 15:00 PDT
>
Where is th
On 24 August 2011 15:13, sebb wrote:
> On 24 August 2011 00:21, David Lutterkort wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I just uploaded the third release candidate for Deltacloud 0.4.0. The rc is
>> available from http://people.apache.org/~lutter/deltacloud/0.4.0/rc3/
>>
>&g
On 30 August 2011 13:38, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> this vote has passed with 6 +1, 4 of them binding:
>
> Chris Mattmann
> Martijn Dashorst
> Christian Grobmeier
> Robert Donkin
>
> Craig Russel *
I assume this was the Incubator vote that was tallied, in which case
Craig Russell
Entries in podling juice not in incubator group:
amattheu,kwouters,nlevitt,raul,vdkoogh,wassa,werner
The committers listed above will not be able to update the juice or
incubator website until this is fixed.
The following command needs to be run on minotaur (people) by someone
with PMC chair karm
On 31 August 2011 06:39, wrote:
> Author: bayard
> Date: Wed Aug 31 05:39:59 2011
> New Revision: 1163489
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1163489&view=rev
> Log:
> Reran clutch. Updated OGNL.
>
> Modified:
> incubator/public/trunk/clutch.pkl
> incubator/public/trunk/site-author/cl
On 31 August 2011 15:33, sebb wrote:
> On 31 August 2011 06:39, wrote:
>> Author: bayard
>> Date: Wed Aug 31 05:39:59 2011
>> New Revision: 1163489
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1163489&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Reran clutch. Updated O
On 14 September 2011 03:08, David Crossley wrote:
> Shane Curcuru wrote:
>>
>> None of them has a useful description on this page:
>>
>> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/
>>
>> Podling mentors, have at it, please! People (even ones not me) really
>> do look at this page and wonder what the n
On 14 September 2011 19:18, ant elder wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Richard Frovarp wrote:
>
>> It would be nice to have one canonical location for some of the information
>> that needs to be updated. It seems that podlings have several different
>> locations that need to be updated w
On 15 September 2011 02:26, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Hmmm, if we're going to build something, why not build it right and ensure
> podlings have DOAP files before they graduate to boot?
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/projects/$podling.doap
> (or some such)
>
> WDYT?
Good
On 16 September 2011 12:58, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
> The voting period has elapsed and the vote is now closed.
>
> Result Summary:
> +1 [1]
> 0 [0]
> -1 [0]
>
> With the two IPMC member votes from mentors on the dev list and the +1 from
> this list, the vote succeeds.
>
> Voter Reco
On 16 September 2011 15:56, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>-Original Message-
>>From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
>>Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 10:15 AM
>>To: general@incubator.apache.org
>>Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.3-incubatin
On 16 September 2011 19:28, Benson Margulies wrote:
> In an effort to reduce the number of procedures vying for neurons in
> my memory, I think it would be good if we went ahead and CMS-ed the
> incubator website. I'm willing to help Joe with this, and he suggested
> that I post this message looki
On 17 September 2011 18:03, Mohammad Nour El-Din
wrote:
> Hi...
>
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 9:03 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 16 September 2011 19:28, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>> In an effort to reduce the number of procedures vying for neurons in
>>> my memory, I
On 20 September 2011 04:24, David Crossley wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>> Mohammad Nour El-Din
>> >sebb wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Also, what about clutch? That currently depends on being able to read
>> >> some XML files.
>> >
>> > Althou
On 20 September 2011 18:50, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Martijn Dashorst
>>> wrote:
IMO the champion helps clarify the inc
On 21 September 2011 11:57, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>> What is the cause he actually fights/argues for? New folks are
>>> speaking to the general list on their own.
>>
>> The cause is getting the podling accepted in the incubator, finding
>> mentors and other interested parties.
>
> "The Champ
On 21 September 2011 15:12, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:21 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 21 September 2011 11:57, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>>>> What is the cause he actually fights/argues for? New folks are
>>>>> speaking to the g
On 22 September 2011 14:03, Shane Curcuru wrote:
>
>
> On 9/20/2011 8:18 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> On 20 September 2011 18:50, Robert Burrell Donkin
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Christian Grobmeier
>>> wrote:
>>
There were some recent additions of existing committers to podlings;
they need to be added to the incubator group which gives site-update
karma.
=>Podling committers missing from incubator group:
modify_unix_group.pl incubator -add=dvryaboy,jmannix,kzhang
Entries in podling s4 not in incubator group: fpj
=>Podling committers missing from incubator group:
modify_unix_group.pl incubator -add=fpj
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional comma
On 4 October 2011 18:26, Karl Wright wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm trying to get a membership count for the ManifoldCF member lists.
> I'm a moderator for these, and at one point I was able to figure out
> how to do it, but the reference that the "committers" page sends you
> to ("the svn "committers
On 4 October 2011 20:12, sebb wrote:
> On 4 October 2011 18:26, Karl Wright wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I'm trying to get a membership count for the ManifoldCF member lists.
>> I'm a moderator for these, and at one point I was able to figure out
>&g
On 5 October 2011 12:12, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> currently we use a three column model. On the right side is the search
> box, links to thanks page and all the projects listed. Everytime we
> add a new podling all podling pages need to be updated too.
>
> I we should remove the third
On 5 October 2011 20:06, Donald Whytock wrote:
> What about storing the podling names in a table somewhere and using a
> Javascript fragment to read the table and populate the right-column
> list? Pages that include the script therefore don't have to be
> updated at all when the podling list chan
On 6 October 2011 22:03, Donald Whytock wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 6:46 AM, sebb wrote:
>> The registry would contain all podling names (current and previous)
>> together with state (active, dormant, graduated, retired) and other
>> basic information.
>> This wo
On 7 October 2011 10:03, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 5:25 AM, Donald Whytock wrote:
>> Apologies. Forgot the status field.
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Donald Whytock wrote:
>>> Okay...attached is a very simple podlings.xml, made from the contents
>>> of the po
On 7 October 2011 22:10, sebb wrote:
> On 7 October 2011 10:03, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 5:25 AM, Donald Whytock wrote:
>>> Apologies. Forgot the status field.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Donald Whytock wrote:
&
On 7 October 2011 22:23, sebb wrote:
> On 7 October 2011 22:10, sebb wrote:
>> On 7 October 2011 10:03, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 5:25 AM, Donald Whytock wrote:
>>>> Apologies. Forgot the status field.
>>>>
>>&g
On 7 October 2011 23:09, Donald Whytock wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 5:10 PM, sebb wrote:
>> However I think it would make sense to sort the entries by podling
>> name, rather than by name within status.
>> Otherwise it will be a pain when the status changes.
>>
Also need to update the project summary page please:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/site-author/projects/index.xml
On 6 October 2011 20:56, wrote:
> Author: simonetripodi
> Date: Thu Oct 6 19:56:38 2011
> New Revision: 1179795
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev
On 8 October 2011 00:47, Donald Whytock wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 6:48 PM, sebb wrote:
>> I'm now thinking it might be better to convert some of the tags to
>> attributes, for example:
>>
>>
>>
>> These are all relatively short fields and I
On 8 October 2011 02:17, Donald Whytock wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 9:08 PM, sebb wrote:
>> It would be easier to edit and navigate if the attributes were all on
>> the same line as the tag
>
> Yeah, that's the plan. I was just listing what attributes would be
&g
On 8 October 2011 02:08, sebb wrote:
> On 8 October 2011 00:47, Donald Whytock wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 6:48 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> I'm now thinking it might be better to convert some of the tags to
>>> attributes, for example:
>>>
>>>
On 8 October 2011 08:49, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 3:25 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 8 October 2011 02:08, sebb wrote:
>>> On 8 October 2011 00:47, Donald Whytock wrote:
>> Updated to use new format and committed.
>>
>> Output is to p
301 - 400 of 1583 matches
Mail list logo
