Re: [QUESTION] How do Java-based projects handle Hibernate?

JPA for the code, OpenJPA/Hibernate in tests and OpenJPA for the runtime until you download it at runtime (like Karaf features can do for ex). Regards, Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Ol

Re: Looking for a champion: resurrect log4j 1.x

I know Vladimir but let's do things in order, if we move in all ways it will fail. Incubating log4j1 will fail as I epxlained - not even sure incubator would let it be incubated since project is official dead for everybody and can only get security fixes (incubator is to ensure you can build a

Re: Looking for a champion: resurrect log4j 1.x

it applied let's create a thread about it as being an issue and look for options but for now the thread is looking for options which are not needed from my window Hope it helps ot move the ball forward Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog

Re: Looking for a champion: resurrect log4j 1.x

Le mar. 21 déc. 2021 à 12:33, Enrico Olivelli a écrit : > Vladimir, > I totally support this proposal. > > Which are actually the steps we need to cut a release of log4j 1.x ? > - establish an Apache project ? > 1. Send a patch to apply on http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4j/trunk >

Re: Looking for a champion: resurrect log4j 1.x

think 1 or 3 are real options, 4 is but not that nice indeed (due to the fact it would be yet another forks but also cause it requires some GAV change or build hack to be done properly) so from my window I would be tempted to push for 2 which sounds like a quick win for everyone. Romain Manni-Bucau

Re: JPMS Projects?

to unamed module by default until you are required to go with jpms. Only feature JPMS has, as of today, is being able to build jvm images and graalvm kind of killed this features by making it irrelevant (I skip the licensing issues it can create ;)). My 2 cts, Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <ht

Re: Alita-validator Proposal

Hi At Apache we have bval which is a bean validation implementation. Contrarly to what was written, bean validation does not work by exception but validator returns violations as alita if I got it right. So overall I am not sure the difference between both except some API choices. Also note that

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache BatchEE leaving the incubator

Hi all, makes 12 +1 (10 bindings) and no other vote so this vote passes. Thank you all. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://g

[VOTE] Apache BatchEE leaving the incubator

for 3 days or until 3 +1 bindings are reached as usual Here is my +1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc

Re: What is the best tool to scan the code?

Hi, 1. ossindex from sonatype covers a lot 2. not sure what you means, findbugs or more checkstyle/pmd? 3. rat plugin for example (see apache creadur tools too, there are license tools). Also note that with the initial dep review + review of the license each time a new dep is added in standard

Re: [VOTE] Zipkin leave incubator, return back to OpenZipkin

+1 Le mer. 19 juin 2019 à 02:42, Dave Fisher a écrit : > Hi David and Greg, > > > On Jun 18, 2019, at 5:39 PM, Justin Mclean > wrote: > > > > HI, > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > I hope the podling has better success outside the ASF. > > > > BTW in all previous cases of podlings exiting I could

Re: [VOTE] Accept Zipkin into the Apache Incubator

+1 Accept Zipkin Le lun. 27 août 2018 05:52, James Taylor a écrit : > +1 (binding) > > On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 8:41 PM Greg Trasuk > wrote: > > > +1 Accept Zipkin (binding). > > > > Greg Trasuk. > > > > > On Aug 26, 2018, at 11:14 PM, Mick Semb Wever wrote: > > > > > > After a brief

Re: [PROPOSAL] Zipkin for Apache Incubator

+1 and exited since it sounds like the promise of a lot of communities interactions (skywalking, cxf, geronimo opentracing, ). Le sam. 18 août 2018 14:27, kristof.adriaenss...@gmail.com < kristof.adriaenss...@gmail.com> a écrit : > +1 Looks like a good move for the community based on the

Re: graphviz as a potential apache project

of the community is already here and I don't see it being that far from ASF requirements so I think going through incubator is a good path. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpres

Re: scala/play community?

unds very interesting, I'm not sure a servlet/jaxrs bridge > > > would be enough for a incubator project (especially in term of > > community). > > > > > > Let's see feedback from the others. > > > > > > Regards > > > JB > > > > > &g

scala/play community?

Hi guys, I wonder if we have some scala@play community or not @asf. I will likely try to bring a servlet/jaxrs bridge soon and wonder if proposing it @asf can be interesting (otherwise I just put it on github). Any inputs welcomed. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.

Re: The role of a mentor

out not mandatory but recommanded rules) 3. be there to remind community is important and not only code to prepare a good graduation Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpres

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gobblin 0.12.0 release RC2

+1, not a blocker since it is more on nice to have helpers than needed tools IMHO and legally it looks ok and it builds properly Le 1 avr. 2018 10:42, "Olivier Lamy" a écrit : > Well not a big drama, we can fix that with the next release. > ATM 2 mentors have voted +1:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SkyWalking (incubating) version 5.0.0-alpha (3rd round)

+1 looks good Le 31 mars 2018 18:05, "Matt Sicker" a écrit : > +1 (binding) > > * Signatures ok > * Rat check ok > * Disclaimer, license, notice files all present > * Build and test ok > > > On 30 March 2018 at 23:07, 吴晟 Sheng Wu wrote: > > > Hi All, > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Coral into the Apache Incubator

+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Le 26 janv. 2018 21:53, "Byung-Gon Chun" <bgc...@gmail.com> a écrit : On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 5:41 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Why not doing a beam subproject? Any blocker? > > Thanks for the question, Romain. We have a flexible,

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

Why not doing a beam subproject? Any blocker? Otherwise +1 to have it @asf, makes a lot of sense. Le 26 janv. 2018 20:58, "Byung-Gon Chun" a écrit : > On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 4:09 AM, Davor Bonaci wrote: > > > Great work -- I think this technology has a lot

Re: [VOTE] Accept ECharts for Apache Incubation

+1 Le 13 janv. 2018 09:17, "Pierre Smits" a écrit : > +1 > > > Best regards, > > Pierre Smits > > V.P. Apache Trafodion > > On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 9:12 AM, Sergio Fernández > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Jan 12, 2018 14:13, "Kevin A. McGrail"

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache BatchEE 0.5-incubating

We didnt change the headers (see https://github.com/WASdev/standards.jsr352.jbatch/blob/master/com.ibm.jbatch.container/src/main/java/com/ibm/jbatch/container/impl/RetryHandler.java). What would be a better mention in NOTICE? Le 11 déc. 2017 07:26, "Justin Mclean" a

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache BatchEE 0.5-incubating

Hi Justin The root NOTICE references the donation but files are under apache v2 license anyway, even referencing IBM so should be good. Romain Le 11 déc. 2017 07:02, "Justin Mclean" a écrit : Hi, I’m not 100% sure I would vote +1 on this release due to possible

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache BatchEE 0.5-incubating

Le 10 déc. 2017 11:35, "Mark Struberg" a écrit : > If you put them under /dev/ for the vote, that makes it easier for the > reviewer to see what is actually intended for the release area. Yes and no. Where do we get this zip from? The answer is: from

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache BatchEE 0.5-incubating

Le 6 déc. 2017 18:22, "Daniel Gruno" <humbed...@apache.org> a écrit : On 12/06/2017 06:18 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > 2017-12-06 18:14 GMT+01:00 Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org>: >> On 12/06/2017 06:10 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: >>> As explained in th

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache BatchEE 0.5-incubating

06.12.2017 um 17:36 schrieb John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: >>> >>> Right, but the IPMC has general oversight and responsibilities for >>> podlings. Our requirements for what goes into a release are at >>> https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubati

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache BatchEE 0.5-incubating

@John: depends the project. DeltaSpike, BatchEE and several others don't and it is fine IMHO. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-12-06 17:04 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: > On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 11:00 AM Romain Manni-Bucau

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache BatchEE 0.5-incubating

2017-12-06 16:41 GMT+01:00 sebb : > On 6 December 2017 at 08:08, Reinhard Sandtner wrote: >> Hey incubator PMCs, >> >> The Apache BatchEE community has voted and approved the proposal to release >> Apache BatchEE 0.5-incubating. >> Apache BatchEE is a

Re: [VOTE] Accept SkyWalking into the Apache Incubator

+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-12-04 13:36 GMT+01:00 Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>: > +1 > > > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 3:17 AM, mck <m...@apache.org> wrote: > >> >> After some discussion on

Re: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi Mick I'm generally +1 and would be very happy to help but before voting can you clarify the position with other donations like https://github.com/cncf/toc/issues/50 please? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-11-29 7:58 GMT+01:00 mck <m...@apache.

Re: Project informal discussion

Hi For sources any template engine is great so velocity, freemarker, ..., even strings (like cxf client plugin does) so need for a more formal lib is less true than for bytecode generation. Eugene (from codelutin not asf) is also a great one for sources. What would add yours? Kind of fear it

Re: The state of Sirona

Le 16 avr. 2017 06:58, "Niclas Hedhman" a écrit : One could also ask the question; Considering how hyped "devops" culture is right now, the central role that monitoring and visualization of that is for devops, How come this project can't attract hordes of people? Is there

Re: [VOTE] Drop incubating requirement of Maven artifacts

2017-01-03 13:45 GMT+01:00 Cédric Champeau <cedric.champ...@gmail.com>: > 2017-01-03 13:41 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > > 2017-01-03 13:38 GMT+01:00 Cédric Champeau <cedric.champ...@gmail.com>: > > > > > +1 > > >

Re: [VOTE] Drop incubating requirement of Maven artifacts

exception confirming the rule?) > 2017-01-03 13:25 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > > 2017-01-03 13:06 GMT+01:00 Guillaume Laforge <glafo...@gmail.com>: > > > > > When you say "it denotes a lack of maturity which is exactly the >

Re: [VOTE] Drop incubating requirement of Maven artifacts

the idea that such a rule should apply to all kind of > artifacts or none, but not be an exception of Maven artifacts. > It doesn't make sense to enforce a rule for just one... and hence the idea > of lifting that rule altogether for everybody. > > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Rom

Re: [VOTE] Drop incubating requirement of Maven artifacts

complained about that excepted about the fact it denotes a lack of maturity which is exactly the purpose AFAIK. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github &

[ANNOUNCE] Apache BatchEE 0.4-incubating Release

The Apache BatchEE and Incubator teams are pleased to announce the release of Apache BatchEE 0.4-incubating. The release passes the JBatch 1.0 TCK test 1.1-b03. Sources are available on Apache download area ( https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/incubator/batchee) accessible through BatchEE

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache BatchEE 0.4-incubating

And here is my +1 So we have 3 +1 bindings (Justin, JB, me) and 1 +1 non binding (Stian) and no other votes so the release passes. Thanks to all who had a look. Will continue with the release steps. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <htt

Re: [VOTE] Apache BatchEE 0.4-incubating

added asc (thanks to have caught that!) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn &

Re: [VOTE] Apache BatchEE 0.4-incubating

added batchee source zip there https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/batchee/0.4-incubating/ Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com&g

Re: [VOTE] Apache BatchEE 0.4-incubating

creating dist/dev, please be patient a moment Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn &

Re: [VOTE] Apache BatchEE 0.4-incubating

2016-09-26 17:56 GMT+02:00 Stian Soiland-Reyes : > On 26 September 2016 at 16:45, Mark Struberg > wrote: > > Again the question is not about our own repo. The problem are the dozen > downstream repos. You cannot delete it from there once it got pulled

Re: [VOTE] Apache BatchEE 0.4-incubating

Think you lost me a bit :s so here where we started the fork from: http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/Re-DISCUSS-jbatch-impl-Apache-td36529.html About dist: should i push it there now or is that a todo for next release? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.

Re: [VOTE] Apache BatchEE 0.4-incubating

2016-09-26 15:20 GMT+02:00 Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>: > On 26 September 2016 at 07:28, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > batchee community voted the 0.4-incubating good to release, here is the > > time

Re: [VOTE] Apache BatchEE 0.4-incubating

2016-09-26 11:31 GMT+02:00 Justin Mclean : > Hi, > > > Comes from OpenEJB for cli - thought it was ok to rely on transitive > > dependencies there - and for the maven plugin it is JUNG (BSD) so think > it > > is ok, did I miss one? > > I think so but it not clear to me

Re: [VOTE] Apache BatchEE 0.4-incubating

2016-09-26 11:27 GMT+02:00 Justin Mclean : > Hi, > > > No, we didn't get an official grant, but the RI is ALv2 and we actively > asked the IBM devs/managers and they are perfectly fine with it. They even > give feedback on JIRA and contributed patches later on. > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache BatchEE 0.4-incubating

2016-09-26 10:21 GMT+02:00 Justin Mclean : > Hi, > > +0 until IBM copyright question sorted. Happy to change to +1 if there’s a > good reason for it. > > I’d guess that the code come from them in a software grant and the > copyright has just been forgotten to be removed

[VOTE] Apache BatchEE 0.4-incubating

, Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rman

Fwd: [VOTE] Apache BatchEE 0.4-incubating

Hi general@! FYI the BatchEE incubation project is votiing on batchee 0.4-incubating Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://g

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - August 2016

août 2016 22:48, "Mark Struberg" <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> a écrit : > Given that Geronimo is nowadays more a kind of „EE commons“, it might fit > in there. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > Am 08.08.2016 um 22:32 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu.

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - August 2016

the incubator for you guys. >> >> I'm pointing out the issue, as last month a mentor refused sign off due to >> lack of content in your report. The current report doesn't seem to be much >> better. I pinged JB off list, so far no answer there either. >> >> - J

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - August 2016

ve a big activity after spec releases then mainly just > maintenance > > until next round. > > > > You probably guessed that I would love to avoid to let small projects be > > swallowed by bigger projects to skip this kind of lifecycle/activity > issue > > and a

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - August 2016

e a good view of the incubator freedom we can have on that area. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau&g

Re: [VOTE] Apache Sirona 0.4-incubating

2016-07-20 10:58 GMT+02:00 Justin Mclean : > Hi, > > > can you confirm which artifacts are missing it please? > > All of them. > > Not sure I follow: » unzip -p

Re: [VOTE] Apache Sirona 0.4-incubating

/apache/sirona/blob/23ca6902ba1a32650b06043f68d02c951629f0bb/NOTICE#L46 ) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc

Re: [VOTE] Apache Sirona 0.4-incubating

up? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rman

Re: [VOTE] Apache Sirona 0.4-incubating

@John: JL just voted too - why i closed the vote on dev@. Seems mail-archives didn't eat it yet Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github &

[VOTE] Apache Sirona 0.4-incubating

lcomed to test and vote. Please vote: [ ] +1 release it [ ] +0 don't care [ ] -1 no cause ${blocker} Thanks, Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Gi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tamaya 0.2-incubating

+1 Le 10 avr. 2016 22:28, "John D. Ament" a écrit : > Copying my +1 from the dev list. > > On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 2:59 PM Anatole Tresch wrote: > > > Hi all! > > > > This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Tamaya 0.2-incubating. > > > > The new

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Johnzon from the Incubator

> > >> > > >> https://s.apache.org/d88S > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> Discussions: > > > >> > > >> https://s.apache.org/5vxO > > > >> &

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Johnzon from the Incubator

367). > > >> > > >> > > >> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management > > >> Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Johnzon Project", > > >> be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the > > >> Founda

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Johnzon from the Incubator

ope of > responsibility of the Apache Johnzon Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache Johnzon Project: > > * Justin Mclean > * Romain Manni-Bucau > * J

Re: [VOTE] Graduation for Apache Johnzon

Ok just pushed one we'll work on. thanks Bertrand. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber &

Re: [VOTE] Graduation for Apache Johnzon

@John: thks, will do Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber <http://www.tomitribe.com&g

Re: [VOTE] Graduation for Apache Johnzon

I did, the idea was to reuse asf charter (replacing ${PROJECT} by Johnzon), ppmc vote was considered useless since everyone agreed and nobody objected so we were at voting on IPMC step, did I miss something? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog

Re: [VOTE] Graduation for Apache Johnzon

n. Should we still write it? > John > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:55 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We discussed on johnzon@ and the graduation is out next goal (there was > > several threads but the one triggering this

[VOTE] Graduation for Apache Johnzon

Hi, We discussed on johnzon@ and the graduation is out next goal (there was several threads but the one triggering this vote is http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-johnzon-dev/201603.mbox/browser ). I'd ilke the IPMC to recommend the resolution to the Board and therefore I'm

Fwd: [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9.3-incubating release

FYI. Apache Johnzon is currently voting on 0.9.3-incubating. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibuca

[ANNOUNCE] New committer: Reinhard Standtner

of a contributor's participation in the project and commitment to the project and the Apache Way. Please join me in congratulating Reinhard! -- Romain Manni-Bucau on behalf of the Incubator PMC

[ANNOUNCE] Apache sirona 0.3-incubating released

The Apache Sirona team is pleased to announce the immediate availability of the 0.3-incubating release. The release note can be found here [1]; The source code and binary package can be downloaded from Sirona download page [2]. This release includes several enhancements on the javaagent and path

Re: [VOTE] Apache Sirona 0.3-incubating

Hi Justin, thanks, I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SIRONA-49 also noted the point about git hashes! Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau>

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache Sirona 0.3-incubating

and with my +1 the vote passes with: binding +1: - Mark, Jean-Baptiste, Olivier, Jean-Louis, Justin, me and no -1. I'll promote the binaries now. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <htt

[VOTE] Apache Sirona 0.3-incubating

/0.3-incubating/>* Vote open for 72H +1 0 -1 Thanks, Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber <http://www.tomitribe.com>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Sirona 0.3-incubating

put general as well trying to avoid to need to get twice the same votes. Should have I cc-ed general instead? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau>

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Oct 2015 ([ppmc])

written Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber <http://www.tomitribe.com> 2015-10-

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9.2-incubating release

:29 schrieb John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: > > > > --001a113f19f2715fd305215c5853 > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > > > I don't believe that to be the case. > > > > You guys are mature enough, why not graduate? > > On Oct 5, 2015 10:06 AM,

Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9.2-incubating release

Hi incubator, Mark forwarded the vote at the beginning of dev@ vote. Therefore it sounds to me we don't need to vote again on these binaries. Can you confirm it please? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | G

Re: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9.2-incubating release

t believe that to be the case. > > You guys are mature enough, why not graduate? > On Oct 5, 2015 10:06 AM, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi incubator, > > > > Mark forwarded the vote at the beginning of dev@ vote. T

Re: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9.2-incubating release

understood it hasnt been clear enough in Mark's mail but still matches the incubator policy. If not we can do the same vote with the same votes, not a big deal. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | G

Re: Fwd: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9.2-incubating release

the +1 bindings listed in the result were the ipmc votes, ie: - Mark - Justin - Daniel - and me Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <htt

[VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9.1-incubating release

Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github https://github.com/rmannibucau | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau | Tomitriber http://www.tomitribe.com

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9.1-incubating release

So vote passed with 3 +1 IPMC bindings votes and 2 +1 non IPMC votes. @incubator: do we need another vote on general@ since we already got 3 IPMC +1? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github https://github.com/rmannibucau

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tamaya Release 0.1-incubating

+1 Le 14 août 2015 18:02, Anatole Tresch anat...@apache.org a écrit : Dear Incubator after the Apache Tamaya PPMC vote passed successfully with 5+ votes for the first release 0.1-incubating of Apache Tamaya, it's now the incubator's task to vote ;) Please see original [VOTE] thread: *

Re: [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9-incubating release

+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github https://github.com/rmannibucau | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau | Tomitriber http://www.tomitribe.com 2015-08-13 11:03 GMT-07:00 Hendrik Dev hendrikde

Re: Are tests part of the r patelease?

Le 9 août 2015 03:31, Anatole Tresch atsti...@gmail.com a écrit : Even for a jsr tests are not part of a release, except the ones that are part of the TCK. Doesnt mean it is good or apache way ;) In your case you may resolve/fix the snapshot dep to bind to the specific snapshot version

Re: Are tests part of the release?

A tag should be buildable anytime. Snapshots can be dropped from repos so from my understanding it is an issue even if less impacting than direct binaries dependencies. Le 9 août 2015 02:05, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com a écrit : Hi, Are tests are part of the release? If they are

Re: Are tests part of the release?

@john: no since it would likely be deleted and has no link with revisions so it is still highly mutable Le 9 août 2015 07:11, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org a écrit : And if you're using a snapshot, just switch to the timestamp based snapshot. On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 8:29 AM Romain Manni

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Johnzon 0.8-incubating

+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github https://github.com/rmannibucau | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau | Tomitriber http://www.tomitribe.com 2015-06-06 21:22 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de

Re: May 2015 Report Timeline

Hello this is pretty sure but as bval I suspect it will be a project moving by batch (ie when needed) and very calm the remaining time - think we already wrote it somewhere BTW. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Johnzon 0.7-incubating

+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github https://github.com/rmannibucau | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau | Tomitriber http://www.tomitribe.com 2015-04-03 12:50 GMT+02:00 Hendrik Dev hendrikde

Re: Do we need @ASFIncubator ?

+1 to keep @TheASF, will avoid noise or misunderstanding when a project is graduated + for general announcements it is more consistent. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau | Blog http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github https://github.com/rmannibucau | LinkedIn

Re: [VOTE] Accept Groovy into the Apache Incubator

+1 Le 19 mars 2015 09:07, Ashish paliwalash...@gmail.com a écrit : +1 non-binding On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote: Following the discussion earlier in the thread: http://s.apache.org/KWE I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Groovy as

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Johnzon 0.6-incubating

+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2015-02-20 14:23 GMT+01:00 Hendrik Dev hendrikde...@gmail.com: The Apache Johnzon PPMC has voted to release Apache Johnzon 0.6-incubating based on the release candidate

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating

+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-18 15:54 GMT+01:00 Hendrik Dev hendrikde...@gmail.com: Hi all, Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tamaya for Incubation

D. Ament''': Author of Arquillian Testing Guide an Enterprise software architect, * '''Romain Manni-Bucau''': Developer convinced by Open Source, highly active on Apache TomEE, Sirona and other Apache projects (OpenEJB, Camel, CXF, Sirona, BatchEE, OpenWebBeans...). It is expected

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Tamaya Configuration

+1, interested to be part of the project as well. Hi all, Thanks for the feedback thus far on the Tamaya proposal. Based on prior discussion, I'd like to present the proposal found at https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TamayaProposal as well as copied below. Please take a look and let me know

Re: [DISCUSS] New Incubator Project for Enterprise Configuration

2014-11-03 9:13 GMT+01:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com: I do think it's an interested and important topic. Was wondering what's Anatole position as the Configuration JSR as been deferred from Java EE 8. Even if Mark and Gerhard are also part of DeltaSpike, that'd be great to avoid

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] HTrace for Apache Incubator

2014-11-03 20:04 GMT+00:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com: BTW, wondering how to get the Apache Sirona community involved or if there is a possible common road where the 2 projects could join. +1. having a single solution would be awesome and sirona is just starting to get there so

  1   2   >