[GNC-dev] wiki:Installing_Dependencies#Installing_Main_GnuCash_Dependencies; was: Build Issues on Ubuntu jammy - guile

: gnucash-devel@gnucash.org > Subject: Re: [GNC-dev] Build Issues on Ubuntu jammy - guile > > > > Am 17.07.22 um 17:25 schrieb Paul Kroitor: >> *the documentation says use guile 2.0 but only 2.2 or 3.0 are >> available - is there any reason not to install 3.0? >&g

Re: [GNC-dev] Build Issues on Ubuntu jammy - guile

Line 5 in the large list at https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Installing_Dependencies -Original Message- From: Frank H. Ellenberger Sent: July 17, 2022 12:27 PM To: Paul Kroitor Cc: gnucash-devel@gnucash.org Subject: Re: [GNC-dev] Build Issues on Ubuntu jammy - guile Am 17.07.22 um 17

Re: [GNC-dev] Build Issues on Ubuntu jammy - guile

Am 17.07.22 um 17:25 schrieb Paul Kroitor: > *the documentation says use guile 2.0 but only 2.2 or 3.0 are available - is > there any reason not to install 3.0? > Where exactly? Perhaps it was written a few years ago with conservatie LTS users in mind, which can be 5 yea

Re: [GNC-dev] gnucash-on-windows master: Guile 2.2 for Windows.

Op vrijdag 26 april 2019 16:44:03 CEST schreef John Ralls: > > I am aware I suggested on irc to put the tarball on sourceforge. However > > while seeing this commit I wonder if there's a reason not to do as we did > > for guile 2.0: start from the upstream tarball and ap

Re: [GNC-dev] gnucash-on-windows master: Guile 2.2 for Windows.

; https://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash-on-windows/commit/fe22df60 (commit) >> >> >> >> commit c739d231b5dc4775d40433d3148979a4a4d4c7ab >> Author: John Ralls >> Date: Thu Apr 25 14:53:28 2019 -0700 >> >>Guile 2.2 for Windows. >> >> diff --g

Re: [GNC-dev] gnucash-on-windows master: Guile 2.2 for Windows.

d40433d3148979a4a4d4c7ab > Author: John Ralls > Date: Thu Apr 25 14:53:28 2019 -0700 > > Guile 2.2 for Windows. > > diff --git a/gnucash.modules b/gnucash.modules > index 04c3856..29b8c62 100644 > --- a/gnucash.modules > +++ b/gnucash.modules > @@ -119,11

Re: [GNC-dev] gnucash maint: Set the SWIG minimum version to 2.0.11 now that we require Guile-2.0.

nucash/commit/2f861bc2 (commit) >> >> >> >> commit 22dd716b58a6a9c424a71268f78af37b972ab23b >> Author: John Ralls >> Date: Fri Aug 10 12:57:46 2018 -0700 >> >>Set the SWIG minimum version to 2.0.11 now that we require Guile-2.0. >&g

Re: [GNC-dev] gnucash maint: Set the SWIG minimum version to 2.0.11 now that we require Guile-2.0.

2ab23b > Author: John Ralls > Date: Fri Aug 10 12:57:46 2018 -0700 > > Set the SWIG minimum version to 2.0.11 now that we require Guile-2.0. > > diff --git a/CMakeLists.txt b/CMakeLists.txt > index f5d372e..42a23b6 100644 > --- a/CMakeLists.txt > +++ b/CMakeLists.txt

Re: [GNC-dev] Ubuntu. Both guile-2.0 and guile-2.2 installed, can't find guile-2.2

As it turns out, thanks to #guile, I found out I had to 'sudo apt install guile-2.2-dev' to properly get the right guile-2.2. C On 11/05/18 21:29, Christopher Lam wrote: As per subject. Having successfully worked on guile-2.0, I wished to try 2.2 and 'sudo apt install guile-2.2' and all

Re: [GNC-dev] Ubuntu. Both guile-2.0 and guile-2.2 installed, can't find guile-2.2

Op vrijdag 11 mei 2018 15:29:34 CEST schreef Christopher Lam: > As per subject. > > Having successfully worked on guile-2.0, I wished to try 2.2 and 'sudo > apt install guile-2.2' and all was well. I can run guile-2.2. > > However cmake rebuild script cannot find g

Re: [GNC-dev] Ubuntu. Both guile-2.0 and guile-2.2 installed, can't find guile-2.2

> On May 11, 2018, at 6:29 AM, Christopher Lam <christopher@gmail.com> > wrote: > > As per subject. > > Having successfully worked on guile-2.0, I wished to try 2.2 and 'sudo apt > install guile-2.2' and all was well. I can run guile-2.2. > > However

Re: [GNC-dev] guile error during build

.go Backtrace: In srfi/srfi-1.scm: 619: 19 [for-each # #] <...> Makefile:160: recipe for target 'all' failed make: *** [all] Error 2 Any suggestions? gcc --version gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.8.5 guile --version guile (GNU Guile) 2.0.9 Frank did reply to your first email, though he didn’t ad

Re: [GNC-dev] guile error during build

m/ccache/2.0/gnucash/core-utils.go] Error 1 > CMakeFiles/Makefile2:3773: recipe for target > 'libgnucash/core-utils/CMakeFiles/scm-core-utils.dir/all' failed > make[1]: *** [libgnucash/core-utils/CMakeFiles/scm-core-utils.dir/all] Error 2 > Makefile:160: recipe for target 'all' failed

[GNC-dev] guile error during build

*** [all] Error 2 Any suggestions? gcc --version gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.8.5 guile --version guile (GNU Guile) 2.0.9 Herbert. ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel

Re: update of guile version in windows build

eef Sébastien de Menten: > hello, > > What version of guile is packaged with the windows build of gnucash ? > I have the impression it is the 1.8.8 released in 2010 but am not sure... > if so, would it be possible to upgrade it to 2.0 or 2.2 ? > > sebastien Gnucash 2.6 i

Re: update of guile version in windows build

Op dinsdag 14 november 2017 09:01:01 CET schreef Sébastien de Menten: > hello, > > What version of guile is packaged with the windows build of gnucash ? > I have the impression it is the 1.8.8 released in 2010 but am not sure... > if so, would it be possible to upgrade i

update of guile version in windows build

hello, What version of guile is packaged with the windows build of gnucash ? I have the impression it is the 1.8.8 released in 2010 but am not sure... if so, would it be possible to upgrade it to 2.0 or 2.2 ? sebastien ___ gnucash-devel mailing list

guile

I'm using archlinux (https://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=arch). It supplies guile 2.0 and guile 2.2 at the same time as /usr/bin/guile2.0 and /usr/bin/guile, respectively. When I build gnucash, I get errors since I'm using guile2.2. Perhaps the fix is as simple as: FIND_PROGRAM

Re: Missing Guile Bindings and False Positive Unit tests

> how far I can take it. Oh, I understand. Personally I would have rather seen Ruby bindings instead of Python, but I didn't write them so > After further inspection, I now understand what you meant my "swig > exports the functions for guile". I found the exactly lo

Re: Missing Guile Bindings and False Positive Unit tests

"swig exports the functions for guile". I found the exactly location where I need to add new exports in the swig interface file. I haven't managed, though, to try it out yet. -- On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Derek Atkins <warl...@mit.edu> wrote: > Hi Chad, > > Plea

Re: Missing Guile Bindings and False Positive Unit tests

Ted Creedon writes: > FYI there is a swig problem in OpenSuse leap 4.2. > > Its not the latest version. And this is why we package it up such that in general you don't need swig to build GnuCash. :) > Tedc -derek -- Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT

Re: Missing Guile Bindings and False Positive Unit tests

7 8:59:27 AM To: Chad Albers Cc: gnucash-devel@gnucash.org Subject: Re: Missing Guile Bindings and False Positive Unit tests Hi Chad, Please remember to CC gnucash-user on all replies so that everyone can remain "in the loop". Also, the gnc-modules should properly export swig-exported

Re: Missing Guile Bindings and False Positive Unit tests

y 18 years old. A long long time ago (well, around GnuCash 1.6 or so), /usr/bin/gnucash was a guile script. It loaded everything in as guile modules (technically it loaded GncModules) and then jumped back and forth between C and Scheme. Still, not everything was available from Scheme, but I don

Re: Missing Guile Bindings and False Positive Unit tests

: <gnucash-devel@gnucash.org> Subject: Missing Guile Bindings and False Positive Unit tests Date: Sun, Feb 19, 2017 4:46 PM Hi, I found some problems with some unit tests for the Guile bindings. Here's the background. Rather than use the Python bindings, I wanted to use guile to add/manipulate

Missing Guile Bindings and False Positive Unit tests

Hi, I found some problems with some unit tests for the Guile bindings. Here's the background. Rather than use the Python bindings, I wanted to use guile to add/manipulate my GnuCash data. From the Python bindings, I deduced that the entry point into creating transactions is via a construct

Re: Guile gnucash modules documentation

> On Nov 6, 2016, at 12:25 AM, Sébastien de Menten <sdemen...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Cross posting to gnucash-devel as probably more a dev question. > Essentially: is there any way to get some documentation (even just the list > of modules with symbols exported) on the g

Fwd: Guile gnucash modules documentation

Cross posting to gnucash-devel as probably more a dev question. Essentially: is there any way to get some documentation (even just the list of modules with symbols exported) on the guile gnucash bindings ? Sébastien -- Forwarded message -- From: "Sébastien de Menten&quo

Problems with make check and guile, apparently

ror: ERROR: no code for module (gnucash engine test test-extras) FAIL test-test-extras (exit status: 1) Followed by several other similar reports. Having searched the list I found suggestions to delete ~/.cache/guile/ccache but that did not help, in fact I tried deleting ~/.cache/guile but again I

Re: Guile

> > > > Do you know anyone who could do a talk on one of your Guile projects > > by submitting one paragraph description to > > https://penta.fosdem.org/submission/FOSDEM16/? > > > > It would be great if you could make it. I have been using GNUCash > > fo

Re: Guile

> On Nov 9, 2015, at 3:35 PM, Pjotr Prins <pjotr2...@thebird.nl> wrote: > > Dear John, > > We have a devroom at FOSDEM this year (one of the most important FOSS > conferences). > > Do you know anyone who could do a talk on one of your Guile projects by > sub

Re: gnucash maint: Cutecash: Switch from guile to xml to manage our iso-currencies source file

://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash/commit/274113b3 (commit) commit e9b6ee74ad4d1461777e8671d5c61161db907ad3 Author: Christian Stimming christ...@cstimming.de Date: Wed Apr 22 22:33:58 2015 +0200 Cutecash: Switch from guile to xml to manage our iso-currencies source file Copies 87520cdde4b

Guile path for scm files

:/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/games:/home/david/Documents Supposedly when I chmod to make the hello.scm practice file executable and run from the terminal command line I should see the Hello World. As opposed to on the command line typing guile hello.world. When I type hello.scm in terminal command

Re: Guile path for scm files

to on the command line typing guile hello.world. When I type hello.scm in terminal command line, I get the following error. --- david@david-Aspire-XC-605G

Re: Building on Windows from scratch - guile problem SOLVED

On Thursday 16 January 2014 14:26:41 Geert Janssens wrote: Gary, While looking at your changes I noticed you changed two lines in the vbs script. One is that you added my repository/branch in a comment. That's ok and makes it easier for others to start. The second is to install

Re: Building on Windows from scratch - guile problem SOLVED

On Friday 17 January 2014 07:30:00 John Ralls wrote: OK Geert, I think I have what you want at http://www.greenwheel.com/publicFiles/rebase-patches.zip Let me know if this works for you. Not being a git expert, it's possible I've not quite done the right thing, but I think this

Re: Building on Windows from scratch - guile problem SOLVED

On 18/01/2014 09:53, Geert Janssens wrote: On Friday 17 January 2014 07:30:00 John Ralls wrote: OK Geert, I think I have what you want at http://www.greenwheel.com/publicFiles/rebase-patches.zip Let me know if this works for you. Not being a git expert, it's possible I've not

Re: Building on Windows from scratch - guile problem SOLVED

On 16/01/2014 15:38, Geert Janssens wrote: On Thursday 16 January 2014 15:06:55 Gary Bilkus wrote: On 16/01/2014 13:26, Geert Janssens wrote: Gary, While looking at your changes I noticed you changed two lines in the vbs script. One is that you added my repository/branch in

Re: Building on Windows from scratch - guile problem SOLVED

On 16/01/2014 13:23, Geert Janssens wrote: On Thursday 16 January 2014 12:14:49 Gary Bilkus wrote: So just to make sure I understand exactly what you need. 1. I should get the gnucash.git repository from git://github.com:gjanssens/gnucash.git 2. I should git branch -t mingw

Re: Building on Windows from scratch - guile problem SOLVED

On Jan 17, 2014, at 5:57 AM, Gary Bilkus m...@gary.bilkus.com wrote: On 16/01/2014 13:23, Geert Janssens wrote: On Thursday 16 January 2014 12:14:49 Gary Bilkus wrote: So just to make sure I understand exactly what you need. 1. I should get the gnucash.git repository from

Re: Building on Windows from scratch - guile problem SOLVED

On Jan 17, 2014, at 7:30 AM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote: On Jan 17, 2014, at 5:57 AM, Gary Bilkus m...@gary.bilkus.com wrote: On 16/01/2014 13:23, Geert Janssens wrote: On Thursday 16 January 2014 12:14:49 Gary Bilkus wrote: So just to make sure I understand exactly what

Re: Building on Windows from scratch - guile problem SOLVED

On Jan 16, 2014, at 7:53 AM, Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be wrote: On Thursday 16 January 2014 07:49:53 John Ralls wrote: On Jan 16, 2014, at 5:23 AM, Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be wrote: 3. Apply your patches and ignore those that are already there is also

Re: Building on Windows from scratch - guile problem SOLVED

On Jan 17, 2014, at 7:39 AM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote: On Jan 16, 2014, at 7:53 AM, Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be wrote: On Thursday 16 January 2014 07:49:53 John Ralls wrote: On Jan 16, 2014, at 5:23 AM, Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be wrote: 3. Apply

Re: Building on Windows from scratch - guile problem SOLVED

. This test fails on mingw in its current incarnation because guile uses a standard test for the function, but on mingw strncasecmp is actually a cpp definition. As a result, guile is compiled with #HAVE_STRNCASECMP unset, and so guile tries to create its own version in read.c Now if you

Re: Building on Windows from scratch - guile problem SOLVED

On Thursday 16 January 2014 11:10:30 Geert Janssens wrote: Gary, Thanks for all your updates. Today I found some time to check which of your fixes I should still add to my windows branch, but got lost in your patch. It looks like you are generating a patch to be applied to the current

Re: Building on Windows from scratch - guile problem SOLVED

On 16/01/2014 11:43, Geert Janssens wrote: On Thursday 16 January 2014 11:10:30 Geert Janssens wrote: Gary, Thanks for all your updates. Today I found some time to check which of your fixes I should still add to my windows branch, but got lost in your patch. It looks like you are generating a

Re: Building on Windows from scratch - guile problem SOLVED

On Thursday 16 January 2014 12:14:49 Gary Bilkus wrote: So just to make sure I understand exactly what you need. 1. I should get the gnucash.git repository from git://github.com:gjanssens/gnucash.git 2. I should git branch -t mingw origin/mingw-rebasing and check out that branch 3. I

Re: Building on Windows from scratch - guile problem SOLVED

Gary, While looking at your changes I noticed you changed two lines in the vbs script. One is that you added my repository/branch in a comment. That's ok and makes it easier for others to start. The second is to install msys-patch. Is there a reason you do this in the vbs script and not in

Re: Building on Windows from scratch - guile problem SOLVED

On 16/01/2014 13:26, Geert Janssens wrote: Gary, While looking at your changes I noticed you changed two lines in the vbs script. One is that you added my repository/branch in a comment. That's ok and makes it easier for others to start. The second is to install msys-patch. Is there a

Re: Building on Windows from scratch - guile problem SOLVED

On Thursday 16 January 2014 15:06:55 Gary Bilkus wrote: On 16/01/2014 13:26, Geert Janssens wrote: Gary, While looking at your changes I noticed you changed two lines in the vbs script. One is that you added my repository/branch in a comment. That's ok and makes it easier for

Re: Building on Windows from scratch - guile problem SOLVED

On Jan 16, 2014, at 5:23 AM, Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be wrote: 3. Apply your patches and ignore those that are already there is also correct. Then before committing anything it's worth considering which changes logically belong together and check these changes in in

Re: Building on Windows from scratch - guile problem SOLVED

On Thursday 16 January 2014 07:49:53 John Ralls wrote: On Jan 16, 2014, at 5:23 AM, Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be wrote: 3. Apply your patches and ignore those that are already there is also correct. Then before committing anything it's worth considering which changes logically

Re: Building on Windows from scratch - guile problem SOLVED

On Jan 9, 2014, at 11:13 PM, Gary Bilkus m...@gary.bilkus.com wrote: Well, interestingly enough, the problem is not directly with the compiler optimizer. It's with the configure test for strncasecmp. This test fails on mingw in its current incarnation because guile uses a standard test

Re: Building on Windows from scratch - guile problem SOLVED

because guile uses a standard test for the function, but on mingw strncasecmp is actually a cpp definition. As a result, guile is compiled with #HAVE_STRNCASECMP unset, and so guile tries to create its own version in read.c Now if you compile with no optimization, the compiler notices that read.c

Fwd: Building on Windows from scratch - guile problem SOLVED

Begin forwarded message: From: Gary Bilkus m...@gary.bilkus.com Subject: Re: Building on Windows from scratch - guile problem SOLVED Date: January 10, 2014 at 2:21:54 PM PST To: John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us On 10/01/2014 17:41, Gary Bilkus wrote: On 10/01/2014 15:03, John Ralls wrote

Building on Windows from scratch - guile problem

I have done some testing of my build, and it appears there is some kind of problem with guile The symptom is that whenever I try to run a report, even hello world, it fails. Digging into things, it turns out that there is at least one problem with the guile build, whcih is that character

RE: Building on Windows from scratch - guile problem

Hmm, The problem appears to be with the compiler optimiser doing something too aggressive, If I manually recompile guile with -O0 instead of -O2 the problem seems to go away. This could be caused by one of the new optimisations in the more recent versions of gcc in which case it could start

Guile 2 status

With r23444 I have squashed the last failing tests I ran into with guile 2 and auto-compilation enabled. I am aware that our tests don't cover the full source code, so there may still be guile 2 related bugs lurking in some dark forgotten corners. Nevertheless I consider the guile 2 support

Guile 2 performance

The people at the guile irc channel asked me for some performance tests in gnucash comparing gnucash/guile1.8 vs gnucash/guile2.0. I thought our GnuCash devs could be interested as well, so here goes: I have conducted two tests: 1. run make check 20 times in the src/report/standard-reports

Re: Guile 2 status

On Nov 26, 2013, at 8:52 AM, Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be wrote: Would this be a good time to start preferring guile 2 over guile 1.8 when both are available ? It's an easy switch in configure. That's fine with me. I've been using Guile 2 for the last week or two and haven't

Guile 2 compatible release tarballs

Let me bring guile 2 up again. The current status is this: - gnucash is ready for guile2, but depends on a very recent version of swig to generate guile 2 compatible wrapper code - in fact *very* recent: swig 2.0.10 has been release today and is the first version of swig capable of generating

Re: Guile 2 compatible release tarballs

On May 27, 2013, at 1:45 PM, Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be wrote: Let me bring guile 2 up again. The current status is this: - gnucash is ready for guile2, but depends on a very recent version of swig to generate guile 2 compatible wrapper code - in fact *very* recent: swig

Re: r22651 - gnucash/trunk/src - Guile 2: replace deprecated SCM_SYMBOL_CHARS function

that to prevent memory leaks in scm_to_locale_string() per the guile manual (see 'http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Dynamic-Wind.html#Dynamic-Wind), you needed to surround scm_to_locale_string() with calls to scm_dynwind_begin (0) and scm_dynwind_free (str) followed

Re: r22651 - gnucash/trunk/src - Guile 2: replace deprecated SCM_SYMBOL_CHARS function

(for example because it triggers the error catch code internally). If that happens, scm_dynwind_free is never reached and str won't be freed. scm_dynwind_free is not actually freeing memory itself, but it tells guile to free the memory whenever the dynwind context is left (locally by reaching

Re: r22651 - gnucash/trunk/src - Guile 2: replace deprecated SCM_SYMBOL_CHARS function

replacement. In the very few cases where it made sense, I kept the original scm_to_locale_string accompanied by the proper scm_dynwind_* calls. I also took the opportunity to improve some other guile convenience functions. But this work is incomplete. I may add to it as I encounter other cases

Re: r22651 - gnucash/trunk/src - Guile 2: replace deprecated SCM_SYMBOL_CHARS function

Geert, On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Geert Janssens gjanss...@code.gnucash.org wrote: Author: gjanssens Date: 2012-12-15 12:58:40 -0500 (Sat, 15 Dec 2012) New Revision: 22651 Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/22651 Added: gnucash/trunk/src/core-utils/gnc-guile-utils.c

Guile-2.0

Hello, nice to hear that my hints were of any help. To cleanup the different hash datatypes is obviously the best solution. Thank you for this and all the other corrections. Relating to scm_internal_stack_catch i found this email: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2011-07/msg9

Re: guile-2.0

On 15-12-12 19:28, Geert Janssens wrote: On 10-02-12 16:34, rbibr...@t-online.de wrote: Starting gnucash within the console will result in a new compile process for the guile files. Besides masses of warnings there are some errors relating missing sw_*** files The lines (load-extension

Re: GnuCash and Guile 2

are cached, this happens only once for normal users. The warnings are apparently harmless, because gnucash runs fine in my tests. Also make check passes for both guile 1.8 and guile 2.0. Word of caution here though: if you install both guile and guile 2, for one of both the guile executable

Re: GnuCash and Guile 2

On Dec 18, 2012, at 10:01 AM, Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be wrote: Also make check passes for both guile 1.8 and guile 2.0. Word of caution here though: if you install both guile and guile 2, for one of both the guile executable is not guile. In my case, I have guile (1.8

Re: GnuCash and Guile 2

On 18-12-12 19:52, John Ralls wrote: On Dec 18, 2012, at 10:01 AM, Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be wrote: Also make check passes for both guile 1.8 and guile 2.0. Word of caution here though: if you install both guile and guile 2, for one of both the guile executable is not guile

Re: GnuCash and Guile 2

On Dec 18, 2012, at 1:16 PM, Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be wrote: On 18-12-12 19:52, John Ralls wrote: On Dec 18, 2012, at 10:01 AM, Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be wrote: Also make check passes for both guile 1.8 and guile 2.0. Word of caution here though: if you

GnuCash and Guile 2

As of r22655 the development branch of gnucash can be built and run with guile 2. It still spews warnings and the environment variable GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE should be set to 0, so this is still a work in progress. It is important to realize though that this is only possible is swig is properly

Re: guile-2.0

On 10-02-12 16:34, rbibr...@t-online.de wrote: -Original Message- Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:40:17 +0100 Subject: Re: guile-2.0 From: rbibr...@t-online.de rbibr...@t-online.de To: gnucash-devel@gnucash.org according to the manual guile provides two types of hashtables one abstract type

guile-2.0

-Original Message- Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:40:17 +0100 Subject: Re: guile-2.0 From: rbibr...@t-online.de rbibr...@t-online.de To: gnucash-devel@gnucash.org -Original Message- Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:36:58 +0100 Subject: Re: guile-2.0 From: Geert Janssens janssens-ge

Re: guile-2.0

Op vrijdag 10 februari 2012 16:34:00 schreef rbibr...@t-online.de: -Original Message- Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:40:17 +0100 Subject: Re: guile-2.0 From: rbibr...@t-online.de rbibr...@t-online.de To: gnucash-devel@gnucash.org -Original Message- Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13

guile-2.0

Hello, as reported in one of my earlier mails I have build a working gnucash (opensuse 12.1, guile 2). but starting a report is still impossible. Today I tried it again in the console and got this message: ERROR: In procedure hash-fold: Wrong type argument in position 3 (expecting hash-table

Re: guile-2.0

Op vrijdag 3 februari 2012 13:15:32 schreef rbibr...@t-online.de: Hello, as reported in one of my earlier mails I have build a working gnucash (opensuse 12.1, guile 2). but starting a report is still impossible. Today I tried it again in the console and got this message: ERROR

Re: guile-2.0

-Original Message- Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:36:58 +0100 Subject: Re: guile-2.0 From: Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be This is also where I stranded so far on Fedora 16, with test packages for Guile 2.0 installed. My guile knowledge is too limited to understand this well

gnucash mentioned in guile docs.

Just a matter of slight interest -- gnucash is mentioned in the guile 1.8 documentation. It seems that gnucash is part of a significant code eco- system for Guile-based applications. See the last paragraph of http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/docs/docs-1.8/ guile-ref/Scheme-vs-C.html#Scheme-vs

Re: Guile 2

On Fri, 09 Dec 2011 23:52:25 +0100, Geert Janssens wrote: Op vrijdag 9 december 2011 10:59:31 schreef Ted Creedon: Is anyone working on the Guile 2 issues? Not right now, but it's on my to do list. I plan to work on it somewhere in the next couple of weeks. Please keep me informed what's

Re: Guile problems

On Jan 1, 2012, at 10:51 AM, Ted Creedon wrote: Nothing like progress, installing guile 1.8 doesn't work either And since Guile 1.8 is known to work with GC (it's what's shipped in the OSX distribution and what you'll find in most distros), you may have other issues... or GC might still

Re: r21803 - gnucash/branches/2.4/packaging/win32 - Fix guile load path for guile-1.8.8

Op vrijdag 30 december 2011 16:40:11 schreef John Ralls: Author: jralls Date: 2011-12-30 16:40:11 -0500 (Fri, 30 Dec 2011) New Revision: 21803 Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/21803 Modified: gnucash/branches/2.4/packaging/win32/gnucash.iss.in Log: Fix guile load path

Re: Guile Strings

. It did indeed silence the deprecation warnings in guile-1.8.8. That's already good. Unfortunately guile-2.0 appears to have changed the way that extensions are loaded, because with guile-2.0 installed make check fails with ;;; note: auto-compilation is enabled, set GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0

Re: Guile Strings

with the patch from the bug and gave it a spin. It did indeed silence the deprecation warnings in guile-1.8.8. That's already good. Unfortunately guile-2.0 appears to have changed the way that extensions are loaded, because with guile-2.0 installed make check fails with ;;; note: auto

Re: Guile Strings

On Sat, December 31, 2011 2:01 pm, John Ralls wrote: On Dec 31, 2011, at 1:59 AM, Geert Janssens wrote: The key is in ERROR: no code for module (sw_gnc_module), and after debugging into it with the Guile interpreter I've established that Guile 2.0 changes the way that it loads C libraries

Re: Guile Strings

On Dec 31, 2011, at 11:11 AM, Derek Atkins wrote: On Sat, December 31, 2011 2:01 pm, John Ralls wrote: On Dec 31, 2011, at 1:59 AM, Geert Janssens wrote: The key is in ERROR: no code for module (sw_gnc_module), and after debugging into it with the Guile interpreter I've established

Re: Guile Strings

and returning it, so either the strings are already getting freed or we're already leaking them. So I went ahead and built swig with the patch from the bug and gave it a spin. It did indeed silence the deprecation warnings in guile-1.8.8. Unfortunately guile-2.0 appears to have changed the way

Guile 2

Is anyone working on the Guile 2 issues? tedc ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel

Re: Guile 2

Op vrijdag 9 december 2011 10:59:31 schreef Ted Creedon: Is anyone working on the Guile 2 issues? Not right now, but it's on my to do list. I plan to work on it somewhere in the next couple of weeks. Geert ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash

FW: OpenSuse 12.1 Guile 2.0

Hello, in the moment I am using this version (J.Engel) http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/j-engel/openSUSE_12.1/i586/ It is working including the onelinebanking (hbci), but the the reports have severe problems (hanging, crashing) In Guile 2.0 several procedures are completly deleted

Re: FW: OpenSuse 12.1 Guile 2.0

Guile 2.0 has sabotaged guncash I'm told to build 2.4.99/2.4.8 against guile 1.8.x which I have with limited success Also discovered dbus problem with running via ssh -X -A tedc On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 2:44 AM, rbibr...@t-online.de rbibr...@t-online.dewrote: Hello, in the moment I am using

Re: Fwd: 2.4.8 git /w guile 2.0

On donderdag 10 november 2011, Ted Creedon wrote: Built a new system w. guile 2.0 export GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0 make clean;./configure --disable-error-on-warning;time nice make -s gnucash On Wed, Nov 9, 2izzy:/data/gnucash # rm -rf /root/.cache/guile/*;gnucash gnc.bin-Message: main

Re: Fwd: 2.4.8 git /w guile 2.0

traces of guile-1.8 on this system? Any traces of an old GnuCash build? -derek On Thu, November 10, 2011 1:37 pm, Ted Creedon wrote: Built a new system w. guile 2.0 export GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0 make clean;./configure --disable-error-on-warning;time nice make -s gnucash On Wed, Nov

Re: 2.4.8 git /w guile 2.0

On Nov 11, 2011, at 8:01 AM, Derek Atkins wrote: Ted, Ted Creedon tcree...@easystreet.net writes: Brand new clean system Lizzy - first build did a git pull and ran the perl script #!/usr/bin/perl #-;-perl-;- use strict; use lib (split(/:/, $ENV{GITPERLLIB} ||

Re: 2.4.8 git /w guile 2.0

Whats the correct incantation? ted On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 8:30 AM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote: On Nov 11, 2011, at 8:01 AM, Derek Atkins wrote: Ted, Ted Creedon tcree...@easystreet.net writes: Brand new clean system Lizzy - first build did a git pull and ran the perl

Re: 2.4.8 git /w guile 2.0

On Nov 11, 2011, at 8:39 AM, Ted Creedon wrote: Whats the correct incantation? To do what? Regards, John Ralls ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel

Re: 2.4.8 git /w guile 2.0

was disabled at configure time. GnuCash 2.4.99 development version Built 2011-11-08 from r872d437+ rm -rf /root/.cache/guile/;GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0 gnucash --debug --extra --log=gnc.scm=debug gnc.bin-Message: main: binreloc relocation support was disabled at configure time. This is a development version

Re: 2.4.8 git /w guile 2.0

--disable-error-on-warning #won't compile without this disable switch make gnucash --version gnc.bin-Message: main: binreloc relocation support was disabled at configure time. GnuCash 2.4.99 development version Built 2011-11-08 from r872d437+ rm -rf /root/.cache/guile

Re: 2.4.8 git /w guile 2.0

you displayed before) should get you to the latest commit. I'll have to investigate the new errors you report below. Geert rm -rf /root/.cache/guile/;GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0 gnucash --debug --extra --log=gnc.scm=debug gnc.bin-Message: main: binreloc relocation support was disabled at configure

Re: 2.4.8 git /w guile 2.0

before) should get you to the latest commit. I'll have to investigate the new errors you report below. Geert rm -rf /root/.cache/guile/;GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0 gnucash --debug --extra --log=gnc.scm=debug gnc.bin-Message: main: binreloc relocation support was disabled at configure time

  1   2   3   4   5   >