I'm also interested to find out how to get a refund after the reports I've
submitted in the last 24h showing in this thread [1] that since the
maintenance window Google AppEngine itself has been the only one
responsible for consuming my quota. While historical stats have also been
wiped out
Since the last maintenance, I'm seeing an elevated number of Python
instances just hanging. My application (id: twimblr) has been running for a
long time and I've never seen this behavior before.
This issue is critical as:
1. they hang around indefinitely even if I configured the app to allow
no transparency and no customer support on
these issues
I am looking forward to hearing something from Google support.
(PS: as I've already mentioned, my app id: twimblr)
On Friday, March 9, 2012 1:35:12 PM UTC+2, Alex Popescu wrote:
Since the last maintenance, I'm seeing an elevated number of Python
to increased billed instance time; 2) lost of historical stats.
On Friday, March 9, 2012 1:35:12 PM UTC+2, Alex Popescu wrote:
Since the last maintenance, I'm seeing an elevated number of Python
instances just hanging. My application (id: twimblr) has been running for a
long time and I've never seen
PM, Alex Popescu alexan...@mypopescu.com
wrote:
2. I have lost access to historical data about the app
Sorry if this seems incredibly obvious, but I just to make sure the
simple answer is covered: You know that logs are attached to specific
versions, right? If you make version 15 default
.
At this point I'm clueless and I'll just have someone to look into this
(hopefully before I'm running out of budget).
On Friday, March 9, 2012 11:33:09 PM UTC+2, Alex Popescu wrote:
After going through the logs I've started to notice a pattern:
1. elevated instance startup times
2. warnings
Hi all,
I'm wondering if someone else have seen this before and has any ideas
what could lead to this completely confusing behavior
class Content(Model):
uri = db.URLProperty(required=True)
content_type = db.IntegerProperty(required=True, choices=[1, 2, 3,
4, 5,6,7,10, -1])
title =
This was embarrassing... Please forgive and forget about this post.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
With just a few days before the new pricing comes into force, the
billing history is once lagging behind 4-5 days. I've been working
around the clock to change my apps to the new pricing model--except
those I have to kill--but because of billing lagging behind the
feedback I can get form my
In the light of the new billing details, I've made some changes to the Max
Idle Instances and Min Pending Latency (as per the optimization
documentation) just to see how these would reflect in my bill. Anyways my
billing history has stopped 5 days ago on Sept. 2nd.
I'm really confused on how
On Wednesday, September 7, 2011 9:40:12 AM UTC+3, renderpaz wrote:
From the looks of your data, it doesn't seem you have any need for a
massively scaling web host. Why did you choose GAE in the first
place?
If your answer is, One day I may need to handle 1000 qps - then I
think the
I've posted this also on the Keep it short: Who is forced to leave GAE?,
but here's the gist of it: 7 single-user (now) apps
from which only 4th in active use: going from almost $0/month to
$645/month.
No comment,
A://
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
I've been running 7 small Python apps on GAE. Here's the current status:
1. from $0 - $2/day = from $0 to $60/month
2. from $0 - $3.5/day = from $0 to $105/month
3. from $0 - $3/day = from $0 to $90/month
4. from $0 - $13/day = from $0 to $390/month
5. I've closed one application immediately
6.
Indeed, the new release sounds really exciting. But I must confess
I've still a bit confused about
the removal of the 1000 result limit as it looks like it wasn't
removed from all the places, but
the docs are not really clear about it.
A place where the 1000 limit seems to still apply is queries
On Dec 10, 1:44 pm, Alex Popescu the.mindstorm.mailingl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi guys,
Can anyone explain the meaning of the CancelledError? I read the
documentation and I must confess that I'm not very sure what triggers
it (at least I don't agree it is explicitly).
Here is the scenario
, considering the above solution the fact that this behavior
changed is no big deal. And I do understand the reasons for
introducing this behavior (avoiding people surprise that something is
working with the SDK but not in production).
./. alex
-Nick Johnson
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:25 PM, Alex
Hi guys,
Can anyone explain the meaning of the CancelledError? I read the
documentation and I must confess that I'm not very sure what triggers
it (at least I don't agree it is explicitly).
Here is the scenario in which I'm seeing this error:
- I have a set of tasks that are executed
- the
On Dec 10, 1:33 pm, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com
wrote:
Hi Alex,
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Alex Popescu
the.mindstorm.mailingl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Nick,
On Dec 9, 1:58 pm, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com
wrote:
Hi Alex
On Dec 10, 1:50 pm, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:46 PM, mb doit...@gmail.com wrote:
My app receives mail and stores them in the datastore. It usually
works fine, but occasionally it has problems decoding the message
body.
It logs
at the application/startup level. I am pretty
sure that I could find a local import that might tell me that the app
is using the SDK, but that seems like a really dirty solution and
I'm pretty sure the Googlers have some hints ;-).
./.alex
On Dec 8, 6:28 pm, Alex Popescu the.mindstorm.mailingl...@gmail.com
Hi guys,
I am wondering if there is a 'recommended' solution for enabling a set
of URIs when the app is running locally for testing purposes.
Until recently I had a setup which was defining additional URI
mappings in a _localsettings.py module and this was set for exclusion
in app.yaml.
But it
On Dec 9, 1:25 am, Alex Popescu the.mindstorm.mailingl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi guys,
I am wondering if there is a 'recommended' solution for enabling a set
of URIs when the app is running locally for testing purposes.
Until recently I had a setup which was defining additional URI
mappings
Hi Nick,
I'll deploy some tests to further investigate this issue and I'll
provide the code and results.
Meanwhile, I'm wondering if you could share the relevant pieces of
code in your app that are tipically
below 600ms. I must confess that I haven't seen many such cases in my
app so far
Bug created: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1850
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
Alexandru Popescu
On Jul 10, 2:49 pm, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com
wrote:
Hi Alex,
You're right - this is a bug. Although the correct behaviour may be to
return
Here's some sample code (not exactly the one I've previously mentioned
as I haven't got the time to prepare it):
[code]
query = ContentEvent.gql('ORDER BY created_at DESC')
event_list = query.fetch(max_results, offset)
# now that we've fetched the initial list we need to navigate all the
On Jul 9, 1:32 pm, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com
wrote:
Hi Alex,
Can you show us the definition of the class mentry is an object of?
Where are you getting the instance of mentry from?
Nick,
Thanks a lot for getting back to me on this issue.
I have figured out why I'm
Hi guys,
I have a cron op that is fetching some records for an entity and does
some processing on them.
While checking my app logs I have noticed that for the trivial case
when no result is returned (and so there is no additional processing
done) this operation is billed constantly with
I am getting a rather weird exception on this piece of code:
[code]
logging.info('auto-publish: %s resulted in %i', str(mentry.key()),
status)
[/code]
File /base/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/ext/db/
__init__.py, line 643, in key
elif self._key_name:
AttributeError:
Nick,
Thanks for your answers. I will follow up with a post including my
suggestions and update this thread.
./alex
On Jun 16, 5:04 pm, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com
wrote:
Hi Alex,
Thanks for your feedback. Responses inline.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Alex Popescu
While I am appreciating the work and innovation behind the App Engine
platform, I believe that billing for CPU time is wrong:
- the terms are not well defined [1]
- it is not clear how they are measured
- there have been repeated problems on the platform and these are
impacting the CPU analytics
I've looked through the official documentation of bulk uploader/
exporter and I couldn't find any reference on how to use it when you
have list or unicode properties.
For unicode I assume that I'll have to encode each such value to utf8
before exporting and decode it back to unicode upon import.
Unfortunately I haven't seen your message and posted about it here:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/7660c2b0002a7d66#
./alex
On Apr 26, 1:38 am, timwee tim.sh...@gmail.com wrote:
I was wondering if anyone is facing the same issue as me...
I have indexes on
Is there any status update on this issue? I have noticed other posts
on the list speaking about the same problem.
./alex
On Apr 27, 2:59 pm, Alex Popescu the.mindstorm.mailingl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I have defined a new index for an entity based on a datetime and 1char
string property
Hi,
I have defined a new index for an entity based on a datetime and 1char
string property. Currently there are only 58 such entities in the
datastore and after 1h15min it is still not ready. I do not see any
reasons why building the index for such a small amount of entities
would take such a
On Apr 22, 12:59 am, Jeff S (Google) j...@google.com wrote:
Hi medecau,
What is the app ID where you are seeing this?
Thank you,
Jeff
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:07 AM, medecau mede...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
i have been looking at my dashboard and it seems gae is having some
On Apr 22, 1:06 am, Jeff S (Google) j...@google.com wrote:
Hi Charles,
Could you tell me the app ID?
Thank you,
Jeff
On Apr 21, 2:41 pm, Charles2008 wyao2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone experienced slow response from gogole app recently,
especially today (04-21-2009)? Out
Hi,
It looks like the production server is dropping everything it founds
after a ; character in an URL.
On production a request to: /090314/vm-memory-in-the-cloud-watch-what-
kevin-has-to-say;b.html
displays for request.url, respectively request.path:
drops it.
And according to RFC3986 my understanding is that the semicolon can be
part of the URL (I'll not reproduce the EBNF here as it is quite
complex).
./alex
2009/4/18 Alex Popescu the.mindstorm.mailingl...@gmail.com
Hi,
It looks like the production server is dropping everything
On Apr 18, 1:17 am, powera pow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 17, 2:58 pm, Alex Popescu the.mindstorm.mailingl...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Apr 17, 8:32 pm, 风笑雪 kea...@gmail.com wrote:
; is not a valid char in url, you need encode it. from urllib import
quote
quote(/090314/vm-memory
On Apr 18, 1:43 am, Alex Popescu the.mindstorm.mailingl...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Apr 18, 1:17 am, powera pow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 17, 2:58 pm, Alex Popescu the.mindstorm.mailingl...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Apr 17, 8:32 pm, 风笑雪 kea...@gmail.com wrote:
; is not a valid char
On Mar 30, 12:24 pm, Alex Popescu
the.mindstorm.mailingl...@gmail.com wrote:
The following code results in an ImportError with the SDK 1.1.9:
from django.utils import simplejson
while it is working as expected in SDK 1.1.8 and 1.1.7.
Any ideas what have changed meanwhile?
I've opened
I've just read the Latency Issues Stabilized notification and I'd
like to firstly thank you for taking the time to explain the problems.
Anyways, I'd also like to point out that the 2 messages in the thread
are not clearly stating if the problem is 100% solved.
While the first message in the
Looks like I've forgot to include the link to the discussion thread:
Latency Issues Stabilized:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-downtime-notify/browse_thread/thread/c1e5c4ca861362f
./alex
On Mar 17, 12:07 pm, Alex Popescu
the.mindstorm.mailingl...@gmail.com wrote:
I've just
Comparing the Datastore metrics for yesterday and today, I'd say that
the Datastore is still having latency problems on most of the
operations.
I'd also have to point out that the System status does NOT reflect
these problems: http://code.google.com/status/appengine/ (it doesn't
show it for
On Mar 4, 6:42 pm, Guy Rutenberg g...@labpixies.com wrote:
Hi,
I've an app that gets some high number of requests (around 9k per
hour) to delete items. All it does for these requests is
items = ModelName.all().fetch(1)
db.delete(items)
(Origninally I've tried to delete more than one item
I've mentioned this thread in a thread related to the same problem
that seems to have got more traction and more feedback:
Datastore operations slow Options:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/e99f4e6eee9c5a5c
If you have more specific information (from logs,
I've mentioned this thread in a thread related to the same problem
that seems to have got more traction and more feedback:
Datastore operations slow Options:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/e99f4e6eee9c5a5c
If you have more specific information (from logs,
Hi,
I'm seeing that most of the datastore ops are being slow lately by
about an order of magnitude slower.
Here is a set of numbers from now:
03-03 12:25PM 46.104 200 2296ms 1398ms-cpu 0kb
03-03 12:25PM 15.755 200 2025ms 1330ms-cpu 0kb
03-03 12:22PM 59.116 200 2519ms 1375ms-cpu 0kb
03-03
) will get better soon.
Bests,
./alex
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Alex Popescu
the.mindstorm.mailingl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm seeing that most of the datastore ops are being slow lately by
about an order of magnitude slower.
Here is a set of numbers from now:
03-03 12:25PM 46.104
Today starting around 07.42am the datastore has started to through
Timeout exceptions. I haven't read anywhere about an announced
maintenance window, so I do consider this a critical issue.
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
Alexandru Popescu
My app DailyCloud: http://the.dailycloud.net/
On Feb 28, 5:49 pm, Alex Popescu the.mindstorm.mailingl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Today starting around 07.42am the datastore has started to through
Timeout exceptions. I haven't read anywhere about an announced
maintenance window, so I do consider this a critical issue.
Forgot to mention that I
Popescu the.mindstorm.mailingl...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Feb 28, 5:49 pm, Alex Popescu the.mindstorm.mailingl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Today starting around 07.42am the datastore has started to through
Timeout exceptions. I haven't read anywhere about an announced
maintenance
On Mar 1, 1:36 am, Greg g.fawc...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm a bit put out by the announcement of scheduled maintenence - for
those that haven't heard, both the datastore and memcache will be
offline for up to 30 minutes at 6pm EST on March 2 and March 9.
1. Extent. Because both datastore and
On Feb 26, 9:26 pm, DJB david...@gmail.com wrote:
I have several indexes based on searchable_text_index that I've been
unable to delete for some time. When I vacuum, the status changes to
Deleting, that after about 40min changes back to error.
Several people on the AppEngine team have
On Feb 26, 5:27 pm, Alex Popescu the.mindstorm.mailingl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I've spent a lot of time lately profiling my app. Basically, I've been
looking for spots where optimizations can be done so that I better
understand its state and figure out how soon I might need to look
Hi,
I'd like to suggest the following DictProperty implementation. It
allows keys and values of all the types accepted by the ListProperty.
The DictProperty is searchable, but doesn't allow yet to search for
keys only or values only.
Please let me know what do you think and if you see ways to
Hi all,
I've spent a lot of time lately profiling my app. Basically, I've been
looking for spots where optimizations can be done so that I better
understand its state and figure out how soon I might need to look at
'Billing'
The thing I've noticed is that even if pluging in cProfile is a very
Hi,
I've read on the group that somebody has extended the db.Model to
automatically provide access to the referenced entity key (i.e. if the
model defines a ReferenceProperty then the Model will automatically
provide access to the referenced entity key -- the value that is
actually stored).
Is there any particular reason for having the Request class extend the
WebOb Request, while the Response is just extending object? As far as
I checked the Request class is the single dependency on WebOb
framework and I find it quite curious.
./alex
I am trying to run 2 dev web servers on my local machine in order to
test some fetch functionality. Anyways, even if both apps are
configured to use different ports and they are running in 2 different
Python processes, this doesn't seem to work. Is this a known
limitation? Is there any
with the port options? You have to give more
detailed information.
Best,
Bill
On Jan 8, 2:39 pm, Alex Popescu the.mindstorm.mailingl...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am trying to run 2 dev web servers on my local machine in order to
test some fetch functionality. Anyways, even if both apps are
configured
On Jan 9, 4:15 am, Tzakie gwood...@comexton.com wrote:
[...]
Can't you guys make something that just returns the keys from a query?
That seems consistent with how I think big table works.
I'm pretty sure there should be a solution for this as BigTable is
basically a distributed hashmap, so
On Jan 9, 1:22 am, Alexander Kojevnikov alexan...@kojevnikov.com
wrote:
Looking at it more deeply every 20th one takes a long time. I assume
that's the data fetch.
I guess you are iterating over a Query or GqlQuery object to get the
entities? This explains explain why every 20th
time on it :-).
tia,
./alex
On Nov 8, 5:47 am, Alex Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm really sorry if it sounded that way, so please do not take it this
way.
I have made some changes according to my above comments and it looks
like it is working as expected. Now I am not really sure
it as the error still persists.
./alex
On Nov 8, 3:05 pm, Alex Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am wondering where should I report a persisting 500 Server error:
[quote]
Error: Server Error
The server encountered an error and could not complete your request.
If the problem persists
feature.
Switch to it for accessing the log and most probably you'll see the
errors.
./alex
On 8 nov, 10:55, Alex Popescu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Nov 8, 6:36 am, Alexander Kojevnikov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Did you check the error log in your admin control panel?
Yes, I did
the post
method should check if the session object actually exists before
attempting to delete it.
I'm opened to all comments, opinions and ideas.
./alex
On Nov 8, 5:33 am, yejun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your expectation on a sample is a little bit too high.
On Nov 7, 9:59 pm, Alex Popescu [EMAIL
I am wondering where should I report a persisting 500 Server error:
[quote]
Error: Server Error
The server encountered an error and could not complete your request.
If the problem persists, please report your problem and mention this
error message and the query that caused it.
[/quote]
I have
that you can sort on.
Then you can use a filter() on the query to get the objects beyond the
first 1000.
If you fetch 1000 records, process 999, and use the sort field value
of record 1000
as a starting value for your next query.filter('field = :1',
record[999].field) statement
2008/10/27 Alex
I am reading on the chapter Executing the Query and Accessing
Results [1]:
[quote]
The datastore returns a maximum of 1000 results in response to a
query, regardless of the limit and offset used to fetch the results.
The 1000 results includes any that are skipped using an offset, so a
query with
70 matches
Mail list logo
