Re: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-14 Thread Sam Franc
Thanks, Sam Greg Sevart wrote: ZZF is short for ZipZoomFly, website here: http://www.zipzoomfly.com/ :) Greg

Re: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-14 Thread j m g
ZFS has been ported to freebsd? On 5/12/07, Scott Sipe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I actually think I'm going to speed up my plans to use my older computer as a freebsd fileserver (using the new ZFS filesystem which seems very cool!) In the future, I'll stick with WD--that's what I meant. Scot

Re: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-14 Thread Hayes Elkins
Uh... https://www.zipzoomfly.com/jsp/login.jsp Is that what you are looking for? From: Sam Franc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: The Hardware List To: The Hardware List Subject: Re: [H] Seagate drive died Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 13:34:46 -0700 How do you log on to ZZF? I seem to get a

Re: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-14 Thread Hayes Elkins
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],The Hardware List To: "The Hardware List" Subject: Re: [H] Seagate drive died Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 15:41:15 -0400 - Original Message - From: "Greg Sevart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: &qu

RE: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-13 Thread CW
MB/cooling solution. Just my general observation. -Original message- From: Thane Sherrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 15:25:40 -0700 To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com Subject: RE: [H] Seagate drive died > At 03:41 PM 13/05/2007, Greg Sevart wrote: > &g

Re: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-13 Thread j maccraw
rington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "The Hardware List" > Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2007 12:47 PM > Subject: RE: [H] Seagate drive died > > >> >> While your argument seems sound, it doesn't appear to agree with real >> world testing. I have se

Re: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-13 Thread j maccraw
Sevart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'The Hardware List'" > Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2007 2:41 PM > Subject: RE: [H] Seagate drive died > > >> >> Thane, you also mentioned that most of the failures you see are in >> big-vendor boxes...is it

Re: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-13 Thread j maccraw
to a UPS and hope for the best is all you can do. What happened to our resident data recovery guy Tim? We could use some insights from him right now! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > - Original Message - From: "Wint`erlight" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "The

Re[2]: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-13 Thread Joe User
Hello Thane, Sunday, May 13, 2007, 11:47:38 AM, you wrote: > While your argument seems sound, it doesn't appear to agree with real > world testing. I have seen EB and BB drives fail by a factor of at > least a factor of 5 over JB drives. The EB/BB line are WD's one year > warranty drives (wi

RE: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-13 Thread Thane Sherrington
At 03:41 PM 13/05/2007, Greg Sevart wrote: for a given model, there is no difference in reliability or quality between a drive sold with a 1 year warranty vs. one sold with a 3 or 5 year warranty. A good example is WD: internal retail packaged drives, regardless of model*, carry a one-year warran

Re: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-13 Thread chuck
- Original Message - From: "Greg Sevart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'The Hardware List'" Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2007 4:20 PM Subject: RE: [H] Seagate drive died Speaking only regarding the CPU, the thermal solutions I see on many Dell machines (

RE: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-13 Thread Greg Sevart
ZZF is short for ZipZoomFly, website here: http://www.zipzoomfly.com/ :) Greg > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hardware- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sam Franc > Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2007 3:35 PM > To: The Hardware List > Subject: Re: [H]

Re: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-13 Thread Sam Franc
How do you log on to ZZF? I seem to get a MEGAGO WEB directory. Sam Hayes Elkins wrote: Almost all drives I purchase are from ZZF. The failure rate of the raptors specifically is documented through purchases from them.

RE: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-13 Thread Greg Sevart
> Naturally most all components function better in a large, well > ventilated > case with an adequate power supply. Who but Dell is famous for omitting > the > CPU fan in many models. They rely on shrouding the airflow through a > rear > exhaust vent fan. That, along with the power supply fan makes

Re: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-13 Thread chuck
- Original Message - From: "Greg Sevart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'The Hardware List'" Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2007 2:41 PM Subject: RE: [H] Seagate drive died Thane, you also mentioned that most of the failures you see are in big-vendor boxes.

RE: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-13 Thread Hayes Elkins
Almost all drives I purchase are from ZZF. The failure rate of the raptors specifically is documented through purchases from them. From: "Greg Sevart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: The Hardware List To: "'The Hardware List'" Subject: RE: [H] Seagate dri

Re: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-13 Thread Hayes Elkins
Makes no difference, vendor is not much of a factor. From: Winterlight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: The Hardware List To: The Hardware List Subject: Re: [H] Seagate drive died Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 20:42:41 -0700 The only consistency in the hardware industry is inconsistency. I

RE: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-13 Thread Greg Sevart
series, carry a universal 5 year warranty. Greg > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hardware- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thane Sherrington > Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2007 11:48 AM > To: The Hardware List > Subject: RE: [H] Seagate drive died > > At

Re: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-13 Thread chuck
- Original Message - From: "Thane Sherrington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "The Hardware List" Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2007 12:47 PM Subject: RE: [H] Seagate drive died While your argument seems sound, it doesn't appear to agree with real world testing

RE: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-13 Thread Thane Sherrington
At 12:30 PM 13/05/2007, Greg Sevart wrote: In short: A drive with a 1-year warranty is no more or less reliable than a drive with a 5-year warranty. While your argument seems sound, it doesn't appear to agree with real world testing. I have seen EB and BB drives fail by a factor of at least

RE: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-13 Thread Greg Sevart
hardware- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2007 7:39 AM > To: The Hardware List > Subject: Re: [H] Seagate drive died > > > - Original Message - > From: "Winterlight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: &

Re: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-13 Thread Thane Sherrington
At 12:42 AM 13/05/2007, Winterlight wrote: The only consistency in the hardware industry is inconsistency. I think it has more to do with how drives are shipped from the vendor. Vendors use to send these out in boxes with big foam inserts, but now you are lucky if they secure it in bubble w

Re: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-13 Thread Anthony Q. Martin
interlight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "The Hardware List" Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 11:42 PM Subject: Re: [H] Seagate drive died I think it has more to do with how drives are shipped from the vendor. Vendors use to send these out in boxes with big foam inserts, but no

Re: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-13 Thread chuck
- Original Message - From: "Winterlight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "The Hardware List" Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 11:42 PM Subject: Re: [H] Seagate drive died I think it has more to do with how drives are shipped from the vendor. Vendors use to send t

Re[2]: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-13 Thread Joe User
Hello Hayes, Saturday, May 12, 2007, 9:10:50 PM, you wrote: > Tons of WD raptors DOA here, but none have failed on me (36, 74 or 150GB) > once they spun up. Same, the one bad one I had was bad out of the box. > The only consistency in the hardware industry is inconsistency. Well said. -- R

Re: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-12 Thread Rick Glazier
Microcenter has OEM bulk drives with ONLY the foil bag anti-static covering them stacked in "bins" where every customer can handle them and bang them around. (Can you tell where I would never buy a drive?) Rick Glazier From: "Winterlight" I think it has

RE: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-12 Thread Greg Sevart
good general-purpose selection that I use them at all anymore. Greg > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hardware- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Winterlight > Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 10:43 PM > To: The Hardware List > Subject: Re: [H] Seagate drive die

Re: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-12 Thread Winterlight
The only consistency in the hardware industry is inconsistency. I think it has more to do with how drives are shipped from the vendor. Vendors use to send these out in boxes with big foam inserts, but now you are lucky if they secure it in bubble wrap. I have bought drives that were thrown

Re: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-12 Thread Scott Sipe
al Message- From: "Hayes Elkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 22:10:50 To:hardware@hardwaregroup.com Subject: Re: [H] Seagate drive died Tons of WD raptors DOA here, but none have failed on me (36, 74 or 150GB) once they spun up. The only consistency in the hardwa

Re: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-12 Thread tmservo
.com Subject: Re: [H] Seagate drive died Tons of WD raptors DOA here, but none have failed on me (36, 74 or 150GB) once they spun up. The only consistency in the hardware industry is inconsistency. >From: Sam Franc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: The Hardware List >To: The Hardware

Re: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-12 Thread Hayes Elkins
Tons of WD raptors DOA here, but none have failed on me (36, 74 or 150GB) once they spun up. The only consistency in the hardware industry is inconsistency. From: Sam Franc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: The Hardware List To: The Hardware List Subject: Re: [H] Seagate drive died Dat

Re: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-12 Thread Scott Sipe
I actually think I'm going to speed up my plans to use my older computer as a freebsd fileserver (using the new ZFS filesystem which seems very cool!) In the future, I'll stick with WD--that's what I meant. Scott On May 12, 2007, at 3:10 PM, Anthony Q. Martin wrote: OK...so you're get it r

Re: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-12 Thread Anthony Q. Martin
OK...so you're get it replaced, get a WD drive, and use the replacement seagate to back up the WD, right? Scott Sipe wrote: ignore it? nope, I'm planning on getting it replaced (my comment below about seagate customer service was me reading stories of people having their disks sit at seagate f

Re: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-12 Thread Scott Sipe
ignore it? nope, I'm planning on getting it replaced (my comment below about seagate customer service was me reading stories of people having their disks sit at seagate for multiple weeks before getting replaced--we'll see, I'm hopeful!). Scott On May 12, 2007, at 1:36 PM, Anthony Q. Marti

Re: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-12 Thread Anthony Q. Martin
don't you have a 5 year warranty on this drive? You're just going to ignore that? Scott Sipe wrote: On May 11, 2007, at 3:52 PM, Greg Sevart wrote: You're kidding, right? One drive is _less_ than meaningless... Greg I totally agree that one drive is not at all statistically or otherwise

Re: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-12 Thread Sam Franc
We sure have varying experiences with HDs. I have had a lot of WDs fail on me too, along with Maxtors. Fate does not seem to be kind. Sam Scott Sipe wrote: Well, my seagate 7200.10 320gb perpendicular drive died after 7-8 months of usage. No warning signs, no temperature issues (surrounded by

Re: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-12 Thread Scott Sipe
On May 11, 2007, at 3:52 PM, Greg Sevart wrote: You're kidding, right? One drive is _less_ than meaningless... Greg I totally agree that one drive is not at all statistically or otherwise significant. What I do think is significant is that a lot of other people seem to have this same ty

RE: Re[2]: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-11 Thread Greg Sevart
st, quiet, and run cool. Greg > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hardware- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe User > Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 3:11 PM > To: The Hardware List > Subject: Re[2]: [H] Seagate drive died > > Hello Greg, > > Friday

RE: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-11 Thread Thane Sherrington
At 05:27 PM 11/05/2007, Greg Sevart wrote: Well, clearly--I was just accentuating a point at the expense of literal correctness. Just picking on you. T

RE: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-11 Thread Greg Sevart
t; Subject: RE: [H] Seagate drive died > > At 04:52 PM 11/05/2007, Greg Sevart wrote: > >You're kidding, right? One drive is _less_ than meaningless... > > It can't actually be less than meaningless. :) But given the > problems I've seen over the last year with S

Re[2]: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-11 Thread Joe User
Hello Thane, Friday, May 11, 2007, 3:02:37 PM, you wrote: > It can't actually be less than meaningless. :) But given the > problems I've seen over the last year with Seagate, I wouldn't buy > one - and I'm taking about an 80% failure rate over about 20 drives. Further confirmation. -- Regar

Re[2]: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-11 Thread Joe User
Hello Greg, Friday, May 11, 2007, 2:52:47 PM, you wrote: > You're kidding, right? One drive is _less_ than meaningless... I assume you are referring to my judgement on his one failed drive. However, he said in his post - that he googled and others are having this issue (which you might have mis

RE: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-11 Thread Thane Sherrington
At 04:52 PM 11/05/2007, Greg Sevart wrote: You're kidding, right? One drive is _less_ than meaningless... It can't actually be less than meaningless. :) But given the problems I've seen over the last year with Seagate, I wouldn't buy one - and I'm taking about an 80% failure rate over about

RE: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-11 Thread Greg Sevart
You're kidding, right? One drive is _less_ than meaningless... Greg > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hardware- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe User > Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 2:41 PM > To: The Hardware List > Subject: Re: [H] Seagat

Re: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-11 Thread Joe User
Hello Scott, Friday, May 11, 2007, 10:43:42 AM, you wrote: > Well, my seagate 7200.10 320gb perpendicular drive died after 7-8 > months of usage. > Big thumbs down and back to WD for me.. Never was a fan of Seagate. This confirms that. I am sorry it happened to you but everyone else can benef

RE: [H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-11 Thread James Maki
> -Original Message- > From: Scott Sipe > Well, my seagate 7200.10 320gb perpendicular drive died after 7-8 > months of usage. > Scott Damn, I have 4 of them! Jim Maki [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[H] Seagate drive died

2007-05-11 Thread Scott Sipe
Well, my seagate 7200.10 320gb perpendicular drive died after 7-8 months of usage. No warning signs, no temperature issues (surrounded by fans), not moved around, it just happened when rebooting after installing some windows updates. Drive emits what sounds like a beeping noise. Fortunate