Whilst I agree with most of what you said, flashing the BIOS is definitely
overkill. Reinstalling the bootloader isn't, but I also doubt 0 formatting
is necessary - your OS isn't going to be executing code from hard drive
sectors before it's (over)written them, I hope.
_
Go to www.amxmod.net and search the forums. If you can't find any plugin
that fit your needs then ask for someone to write one or even better,
learn how to do it yourself :)
/Oscar
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 19:42:14 +0100
Jakob Andréen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dudes have allr
I would be very happy if you could do the same test on the same
machine(s) but with freebsd :)
/Oscar
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 13:48:24 -0700
"James Couzens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Everyone,
>
> I spent several hours gathering this information, and I hope that some
&g
lower??? are you sure? our servers used slightly more CPU with HZ=1000, not that much
but still not lower :)
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 02:26:25 +0200 (CEST)
kama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Bart wrote:
>
> > I've just installed Free
The HZ option will probably increase your CPU usage, but not that much, why not try it
:)
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
On Fri, 06 Jun 2003 21:44:18 +0200
Bart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just installed FreeBSD 5.0 on a SMP-system,
> and I'm running several CS-servers on
woohoo(not), eric is awake ;)
To bad you missed all the fun stuff, 3 or 4 has allready responded to the fun reading.
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 00:03:00 -0500
"Eric \(Deacon\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 20-30% increase in server CPU time shows they're trying
> > to make the program stronger and fast
It would be nice to have the 3.1.1.0 + the flashbang bugfix, valve, please! ;)
On Sun, 01 Jun 2003 23:56:14 -0500
Rick Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --
> Where have you guys been? It was immediately established that the first
> 3.1.1.1 was a resource hog after it was released and none of
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003 19:14:57 -0700 (PDT)
"Mad Scientist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> According to the great words of Britt:
> > In the end - it all makes the difference. CPU / routing - all of it
> > must work together... 20-30% increase in server CPU time shows they're
> > trying to make the p
rvers out on the net then
people must afford to buy them :P
I know it's boring and really not fun at all for the programmers, but I would rather
have bugfixes instead of new features...
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003 20:36:06 -0500
"Britt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
hmm, it seems more like a statement rather than a license :)
/Oscar
On Sat, 31 May 2003 13:52:38 -0400
"Nathan Dodd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you not see the license? It is about 1 sentence right above the accept
> button.
> Nathan Dodd
> VUGaming
Can one ask what ping you get when using that? :)
/Oscar
On Fri, 30 May 2003 20:51:13 -0700
agenthh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the help. I've ended up using an application called Zebedee.
> Works real well and is easy to work with. You could use it over ssh
> tu
configured and let in UDP packets on
port 53, it's usually used for DNS queries from client to nameservers...
oh, and you must run the HL server as root fortunately :/
/Oscar
On Fri, 30 May 2003 18:59:26 -0700
agenthh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to tunnel in to
Hmm, maybe not what you're looking for but why not use "sftp" ?
/Oscar
On Wed, 28 May 2003 13:53:45 -0700
"spoon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Off topic, but I figured someone here could steer me in the right direction:
>
> Does anyone know of a comman
Well, doh... Then we might want to change the name of this list to "Linux newbie list"
or something else...
Ofcourse you need to run linux or freebsd to run the linux version of HL, but there
are plenty of other lists, forums, howto's and so on that have that sort of
informati
en put the [OT] tag in the subject...
/Oscar
On Sat, 5 Apr 2003 11:55:11 -0800
"Bryan R. Yablonski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For anyone who is interested you can participate in
> http://bitconjurer.org/BitTorrent/download.html and download RedHat 9 and other
> Lin
Ok, but at least try the lines I gave you... If I'm not mistaking I had some trouble
with it and it seemd to work, IP was correct with ifconfig, but when I started HL up
it wouldn't work :/
This is the only problem I can think of, but this is as I said on 4.7...
/Oscar
On Fri, 28 M
netmask 255.255.255.240"
ifconfig_fxp0_alias0="inet 202.36.xxx.xxx netmask 0x"
This is working for me on freebsd 4.7 but I think it should be the same at 5.0...
/Oscar
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 17:08:43 -0800
m0gely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Drew Broadley wrot
But that should hardly be the problem. eepro100 works great, the only
difference I noticed is that e100 had some more features...
/Oscar
Kevin J. Anderson wrote:
you could also try intel's own new linux driver, e100. It seems to do very
well from my tests. Ive moved away from eepro100 on a
This is what we are saying... Kernel versions after 2.4.9 are wierd...
Try the one we suggested and find out this yourself, no idea in us
speculation any more before you've tried that...
/Oscar
Michael Madsen wrote:
I'm at this moment running two servers.
1. Runnning de_dust 16/16
Go with 2.4.9... all newer version has the "bug"...
/Oscar
Michael Madsen wrote:
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 25-03-2003 at 09:50 Kevin J. Anderson wrote:
I would imagine it has to do w/ overhead due to changes/improvements to the
kernel. I think around 2.4.9 they
By the way, way is it so???
I mean, the problem can not only exist when you run HL.
Have there been any bug reported about this to the kernel developer???
/Oscar
Matt wrote:
Your going to find wierd problems with kernels after 2.4.9 and up to
about 2.4.16 or .17.
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 08:43
Don't know for sure. But try the 2.4.9 and if the same problem exist try
latest 2.2.x
People have reported wierd stuff with kernels later than 2.4.9, but I
don't know if this problem can be related to that...
Or you can use Freebsd instead of linux... :)
/Oscar
Michael Madsen wr
What kernel are you using? And have you tried 2.4.9 or the latest 2.2.X?
/Oscar
Michael Madsen wrote:
I'm having the same "problem" myself.
Running 2-3 full servers with 90-95% idle, but when I put on another server one or two
of the servers suddenly uses 30-40% CPU.
That&#x
haha!
And I really need to have a floppy drive because I have it on all my
servers... bah!
Kevin J. Anderson wrote:
->-Original Message-
->From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andy Hodges
->Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 4:40 PM
->To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
->Subject
Running any plugins?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
i've got a problem with starting hlds,
i've read over 10 howto's and tutorials, posted on 4 forums, no help,
i've read the 25 pages of the forum on server.counter-strike.net, but
no help.
when i start hlds with ./hlds_run ... ... ...
i only get :
t 60% cpu...
So I would say it's pretty impossible to run 3 servers on your 2.0ghz
server...
/Oscar
Ryo wrote:
Hi,
Thx for the reply.
So what else can cause the lag? Pls enlighten me.
Is it the isp?
Pls help.
Regards
Shao wei
Regards
--- DLinkOZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
3 servers
discs is pretty obvious, but is it possible to change from one array to
another without losing data, that's the question :/
Send adaptec an email or search the web for some answer...
/Oscar
Oscar N aka 'Dreadful' wrote:
Hmm, forgot to answer your question :P
It depends very much on th
mmon firewalls? aaah, now it's getting tricky!
Hmm, by the way, what does this have to do with Dualie Athlons? ;)
/Oscar
Eric (Deacon) wrote:
But if I were to choose between hub, switch,
router, brouter, bridge or gateway, I would say router because
that is closest to the function...
And if y
Now that reply was really not intelligent... Go install windows XP on
400 machines as punishment!!!
DmD wrote:
yes eric, and wou are surely one of the biggest n00b/uninteligent guys in
here...
- Original Message -
From: "Eric (Deacon)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sa
This APT has Super Cow Powers.
Why use redhat when you can use the all mighty apt-get that comes with debian :)
Hehe, another distro flame, muahaha...
Tyler \"Overkill\" Schwend wrote:
Does Gentoo do anything similar to RedHat's Up2date? That's THE
reason I use RedHat. I'd like to give Gentoo a
ranslated which might not have been the
original definition of a router...
But if I were to choose between hub, switch, router, brouter, bridge or
gateway, I would say router because that is closest to the function...
/Oscar
Eric (Deacon) wrote:
A router (by my reckoning, anyway) would be any dev
as if you also use it as a router, because
you will need 2NIC's for every network you want to protect. If you use
it as a router also you only need 1NIC to the gateway and 1NIC for each
of the net behind the firewall...
/Oscar
Florian Zschocke wrote:
Mad Scientist wrote:
And most firewall
That doesn't seem like 1 single array :P
And you know that we'll have to kill you when you write stuff like C:
/Oscar
Ronin wrote:
IRC script I have that shows what I have in space on each one of my drives.
Now THAT is a raid array :)
- Original Message -----
From: &q
Yeah, that should be enough. Only wanted to make sure your problem
doesn't depend on that issue at least :)
But I would recommend to put at least 128mb more into that machine when
you're running 2 hl servers...
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
Capriotti wrote:
As a rule of thumb, make your swa
restarting the process...
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
Fredde von Kantzow wrote:
As far as I'm concerned there is no such site..
Use my friend google :D
-FvK
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thx for that. I didn't know.
Where can I find all the parameters to put in the
commandline please?
Adviser
81
Running FreeBSD without any pingbooster, but with the kernel option
HZ=1000, the effect is somehow the same as using pingbooster...
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
Gambler wrote:
some questions do u use any pingbooster on the servers ? valves or
udpsoft ? what values if u use valves
do u use sys_ticrate
Didn't someone said that the won servers changed IP?
If so, then the dns you are using might now have updated yet, wait 24h
or so and it should work...
/Oscar
Capriotti wrote:
The servers under the "Secure" tag are not responding.
Tried pinging them and nothing happens
hmm, running stuff as root is not secure, not in any way, not even close...
/Oscar
White Tiger* wrote:
He's wise! I love him :p
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of agenthh
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 6:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROT
This is not the AdminMod forum, post your stuff there instead...
/oscar
Tyler \"Overkill\" Schwend wrote:
Is there any way to have adminmod preserve a few powers even when
someone is outranked in highlander mode? For instance, I don't
want anyone to lose admin_chat just bec
While you might have gdb installed doesn't mean that hl automagically
find it...
/Oscar
de Waha Tom wrote:
the only thing i get is that i should install gdb, but gdb is installed :/
- Original Message -
From: "Douglas R Taber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL
no, no, P4 and XP ;)
Matt wrote:
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 09:13, Eric (Deacon) wrote:
The only point I had with my reply was that duron did
not perform well, while xp and p4 do...
Congratulations for discovering that the P4 out performs the Duron.
--
Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
__
with what stefan said:
Intel P4 256k has 8k + 256k = 256k
Intel P4 512k has 8k + 512k = 512k
I don't know when they started with 512kb but that might have something
to do with it...
/Oscar
Eric (Deacon) wrote:
The only point I had with my reply was that duron did
not perform well, whi
was that duron did not
perform well, while xp and p4 do...
/Oscar
Stefan Huszics wrote:
Oscar N wrote:
This might not be the answer you want.
AMD Duron has 64kb of cache
AMD XP has 256kb
Intel Celeron has 128kb
Intel P4 has 512kb
How can so many people (Oscar is just the one I happend to
would be to go with the AMX XP, since it's cheap and gives
greats performance...
/Oscar
Hlds Linux wrote:
Hi all,
we wanna upgrade our Server wit CPU-Power,
but we couldnt spend all Server P4-2,4 GHz.
So we wanna know ... what is better:
CeleronII 2.0 GHz with 128 KByte Cache or a
Pentiu
All your base are belong to us!!!
lastshooter wrote:
Proper grammar and speech patterns a must for me. Not only are all kinds
of
That's what they said about "blues music and rock n roll" back in the day.
Glad they were wrong.
To me, with the number of people gaming and chatting online, a
Looked at MatchMod? www.djeyl.net
/oscar
fingers wrote:
Hi
I sent this to the hlds list. I'm hoping that someone on this list might
have a suggestion for me.
thanks in advance
--Rob
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 20:24:06 +0200 (SAST)
From: fingers &l
As always, search the allmighty archive before posting here...
/oscar
matt gossage wrote:
There are'nt any VAC updates Scheduled for tonighit are ther?
And another question,
Does anyone know the affect of running a HLDS_L server niced.?
Does it cause Choke / Loss?
Any
I think he only wanted to brag about all the servers, but the guy with
160 or so beated him :P
By the way, put the [OT] on stupid mails like this. That way my filter
can show them the way to devnull...
Eric (Deacon) wrote:
All i'm asking is can they PLEASE release the final on a friday night.
guess
you allready know that...
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
Jay Anstiss wrote:
Oscar said:
if you for an example change sensitivity, then every time the wwcl check
goes through your setting is set it back to what you had when you started
Hmm...that doesn't sound too good. I have thought
Then I don't think you can do so much but to put the vars in the server.cfg
Then they will at least change at mapchange :/
/Oscar
Jon Dingman wrote:
Jon Dingman wrote:
Is there a way to set variables so that they cannot be changed via
rcon,
such as a hostname, or any sv_ o
eased value of cl_cmdrate and cl_updaterate on the
client lowered the choke...
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
Quoting "Andrew A. Chen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I've personally tried setting it to '0' with little to no change.
>
> ---
> Andrew A. Chen
> Divo N
t; rcon admin at:
> Beer for Breakfast servers<http://bfb.bogleg.org/>
>209.41.98.2:27016 (CS multi-map) 209.41.98.2:27015 (DoD)
>209.41.98.2:27017 (CS militia/dust2)Dallas, TX
>
> ___
> To uns
Yepp, check the history, think someone posted it like a few days ago or
so...
kama wrote:
is there any systemstats package for hlds_linux?
ie. mrtggraphs stylee of amount of ppl connected.
/Bjorn
It makes it all the more worthwhile when you see people giving you
the look. You know, the stupid
Hmm, or why not write anything at all and use psychoquery?
It can show you the map, server settings, player names, max/used slots
and some more stuff I think...
However, it can not show you the wonid of the players who are connected...
Oscar N wrote:
or... You can with the help of kkrcon send
or... You can with the help of kkrcon send the rcon command "status" to
your server.
Write a small perl script that use kkrcon and then parses the output
into whatever you would like...
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
Josh wrote:
Alright! Thanx for the info everyone! it helps alot!
-Josh
) gfx( 0) snd( 0) ents(140)
100 fps -- host( 10) sv( 0) cl( 0) gfx( 0) snd( 0) ents(140)
100 fps -- host( 10) sv( 0) cl( 0) gfx( 0) snd( 0) ents(140)
I compiled the kernel with options HZ=1000 and upgraded linux_base to 7
I think...
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
Kevin J. Anderson wrote:
>y
Hmm, 7, or was it 7.1... I think it was 7 :P
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
Imraan Sathar wrote:
>What Linux lib version u using?
>
>
>
>>On our dual pIII computer with linux we run two 18 player
>>servers that are full all the time. The ping has been around
>>70-80ms
g list, I did not put
that much effort on how to solve your problem... This is after all a
list about HL in linux...
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
Joshua Gardiner wrote:
>Hiya,
>
>My current box is a PIII 550 running 256megs of ram. Now, when I have 2 12
>player servers with 10 people each.. i
reserved slots for admins and if P2 can only allow
registered users on the rest of the slots...
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
Quoting Florian Zschocke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Oscar wrote:
> >
> > Oh, by the way, if you run adminmod with reserved slots togheter with
P2,
> what
> &g
Most people recommend that you don't change the priority for hl, but what
might help is to put a positive nice value on your grep/zip command.
Type "man renice", pretty good documentation...
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
Quoting Mike Hodgkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This is
update maybe?
Oh, by the way, if you run adminmod with reserved slots togheter with P2, what
would happen?
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
Quoting dJeyL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hey guys,
>
> I've just released a brand new version of my PrivatePlayers (P2) server
> addon, allowing ad
aah, me who is tired then :P Time to sleep!
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
Barry L. Jeung wrote:
>Oscar,
> Log on will create the normal LMMDDxxx.log type logs. But the
>actually console output is normally lost. With HalfD it logs the console
>output to hlds_l.log. All the initializat
Eeh, is it me who is tired or did I understand this question right...
But shouldn't it be enough to start it with "+log on" as you do in *nix?
Don't know for sure, long time since I installed a HL server on winblowz...
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
Barry L. Jeung wrote:
>This is
in weapon and things
like that. And what we hope most for is to get rid of the players who
ruin the game.
If anyone has some code/idea or want the code, let me know...
Check it out at http://stats.bhood.nu It's not finished yet, but it's
not much let.
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
___
The same problem exist when you launch the HL/CS servers in insecure mode.
At least at our debian server, don't know about freebsd...
The only way I find to defeat the high CPU usage is to turn of the
pingbooster...
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
Quoting David Touitou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
No I have not tried the beta... Does it fix the problem or have you even
tried it? :)
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
Quoting David Touitou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Quoting Oscar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Someone said that he couldn't think of any other reason than VAC
Hmm, I discovered something... The pingboost option 1 and 2 seems to double
the CPU usage!?! They have increased the CPU usage but never doubled it...
Is this the way it's suposed to be or is it some bug? I'm thinking that it
is running in pingboost mode 3 even while you type 1 or 2.
HL or/and CS that have been more demanding?
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
Quoting David Touitou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Quoting Oscar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Some of this info has allready been told in another thread but I'll
> > type it again since this topic fits b
ght list to announce things like this?"
And perhaps by someone that have some kind of "admin" right here :P
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
Joshua Gardiner wrote:
>I'm sorry you feel that way but I think this is the perfect place for this
>sort of thing.
>
>Everyone here wan
kes a third party application would
mail this list whenever they make some changes.
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
Joshua Gardiner wrote:
>Couldn't think of a better place..
>
>Joshua
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Oscar N [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, S
uot;;
}
One problem with this is when you are behind a firewall that does not
forward or reply on icmp(ping) packets. I'm going to print out some info
text about that, and instead of not returning any numbers at all in
min/max/avg it will show 0 or some other value...
/Oscar, www.bhood
Yes that would help somehow, but the script need the wait one mapchange
before it change rcon pass...
And it doesn't help to much on rcon quit :/
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
Brian A. Stumm wrote:
>On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, MoD wrote:
>
>
>
>>A good way for that is putting the d
Hmm, don't want to start a thread without an end, but try debian before
saying something like "Red Hat is supposedly easeir to admin."
Never underestimate the power of apt-get :)
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
>IMHO, any currently maintained Linux distribution will work just fine.
>
s not used for clan matches :/
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
Brian A. Stumm wrote:
>On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, Oscar N wrote:
>
>
>
>>Aah, ok :)
>>
>>I was confused when you answered "No" to my erlier post, which not had
>>the best formulation from me:
>>
>
one type like this?
"rcon rcon_password somethingelse" or "rcon quit"
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
Brian A. Stumm wrote:
>Let me try to explain the process again.
>
>You are the leader of your clan X who is registered to use the server
>booking system on my website. You have s
...
And by "I change from default...", you do mean some script, not
yourself, right? :)
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
Brian A. Stumm wrote:
>No when the schedule the reservation time they specify the rcon_password
>they wish to use. I store it in mysql db. Then when they confirm
Bah... ;)
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
Eric (Deacon) wrote:
>>Deebiaaan!
>>
>>Do I need to say more :P
>>
>>
>
>you forgot: "...is great, but gentoo is better!" :P
>
>--
>Eric (the Deacon remix)
>
>__
Why not try to enable it and check for yourself :)
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
Anders Vinger wrote:
> Sorry if I bring up an old theme here.
>
> My servers run on 100mbit\s lines, and actually one with 1Gbit\s line
> Loads
> of cpu to spare on them too, so pingboost doesnt cost
I'm guessing that is starts to lag when it reach above, say like 4 or 6
players :P
Omer Cohen wrote:
>Please give us more details so we can help,
>bandwidth? ram? os?does the lag appers in regular hours or it comes
>randomly?
>Regards,
> Omer Cohen
>- Original Message -
>From: Br
huh, wu-ftpd, why use that when you can "apt-get install proftpd" :)
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
James Bourke wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I've always been pretty careful about security but I made a mistake
>this weekend and I wanted to share it with everyone here.
>
>Ov
1
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
Zack Sloane wrote:
>
> How many servers can you run on a 800 MHz Athlon with 758 MB PC133 ram.
> Like 16 player servers. Any thoughts on how many HLDS this could run
> without overloading the system?
>
>
> ___
I will wrap all the files togheter and put them on a ftp later today :)
I can also write a short file that describe the things that has been
done, and also what need to be done.
Check this list for the ftp address in a few hours...
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
siberia wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
o look up all
the changes I've done. I can send you the files as there are right now,
but the code is ugly and there are some other extra stuff in it to...
Only let me know where to send them...
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
Brian Vagnoni XO wrote:
>Dear Oscar;
>
>Is that your site/page. I
e have not been that much captured by hlguard lately, but
some recoil script and awp script have been reported...
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
Mad Scientist wrote:
>On Monday 22 July 2002 06:17 am, you wrote:
>
>
>>I never see hlguard catch anyone, just vac cheats. So I ask you is running
lf, it was in the program ssh or apache the
bug existed...
Therefor can you not say that some dist is more secure than someone
else. Because they are all made of the same kernel, and if you choose to
run all the stupid services as default then you are the worst security
whole ever :P
/Oscar
MKi
+128mb ram...
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
Omer Cohen wrote:
>Okay,
>so whatcpu and ram do i need to run AT LEAST four servers ?
>Regards,
> Omer Cohen
>- Original Message -
>From: "Udo Held" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+128mb ram...
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
Omer Cohen wrote:
>Okay,
>so whatcpu and ram do i need to run AT LEAST four servers ?
>Regards,
> Omer Cohen
>- Original Message -
>From: "Udo Held" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pigboost 1 and 2 does ???
>
>Regards,
> Omer Cohen
>- Original Message -
>From: "Oscar N" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 8:14 AM
>Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] New Security Modules
>
>
>
>
&g
And I can't think of many serious server
admins out there who can't change a value from 0 to 1 or 2... But hey,
you can always use the default values if you're not that good :P
/Oscar
Elminst wrote:
>So it would seem the wanted options are;
>1. non secure
>2. secure with
>
ho want to include all bans from the global list can do
so, and they who don't want to include it can skip it and still run a
secure server who protects against cheaters...
And about reporting caught cheaters to the global list, hmm... Don't
know really, but I'm sure there can be an
Hmm, Pingbooster from UDPSoft, does it even work after valve released
the builtin!?!
Then about the lag, I think the problem is one of the following:
Either you disk is of IDE type and when there are some reading and
writeing from it there can be some lag.
Or, your cpu load is to much for what it
a
certian amout of bandwidth, and you also do such advanced stuff like
lower the bandwidth for a specific user if he starts downloading a file
that is over a certain size...
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
Jeremy Brooking wrote:
>Just thinking, a very simple solution to the original problem.
>Inste
d money on fast
cpus than more ram than needed... 128mb for each CS is good enough. The
servers we have doesn't use above 100mb of ram, even if then have been
on for a couple of weeks...
/Oscar, www.bhood.nu
Prodigy wrote:
>32 Players on de_piranesi will use 65+% of a AMD MP 1600+ system (one
pIII 866 to around 930 or so...
And you will need about 128mb as most to each CS servers + some ram for
the OS.
If you lower the maxplayers with a few, don't use pingbooster and so on.
I'll guess you can get away with half the cpu power...
Maybe someone else has some more exam
Make the file executable and then run it...
for an example:
chmod a+x file.bin
./file.bin
Nima Sadeghi wrote:
>[ Converted text/html to text/plain ]
>lo. im having some problems with updating my linux cs server to 1.5. for i
>have found the cs update as a tar.gz file but i cant find the halfli
certainly have answered your question.
There you have it, the real admin way... Oh, and don't forget:
Another golden rule: Pretend the problem goes away if we ignore it.
/Oscar
- Original Message -
From: "Eric (Deacon)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
S
> Does this beta server include the performance optimisations
> Leon was working
> on a few weeks ago?
I tried Leons binary, and I didn't notice any difference...
//Oscar
___
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the
er is sufficient.
//Oscar
>i run a nice little 16 player server on a 1.1/1.1 SDSL ($300/mo).
>http://www.beatdown12.com
Uhm. I pay $20/month for 2,5down/768up . I get two static public IPs that I
can run non-commercial servers on. I live in sweden, where do YOU live? :P
//Oscar
What's the status on PB? Still suspended and no further word on whats going
to happen to it regarding HL support?
Are there any other anti-cheat systems that don't involve sharing banlists
that are stable enough to run on a public server?
//Oscar
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
