Hello,
I would like to know if there is an XML parser available on z/OS?
Thanks a lot in advance for your help,
Romain
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 10:58:15 +0200, CAPRON Romain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to know if there is an XML parser available on z/OS?
Romain,
Have a look at
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/software/xml/
Hope that helps.
Roger
We see such spikes caused by the WMQI Broker (or what is called these
days). At startup, it allocates a huge amount of storage (0.6 GB) per
address space (4 or 5), which is paged out for 90% after some time.
Caused us an aux storage shortage. And a subsequent haggle with IBM, as
their LE defaults
Hi folks
Anyone know where I can download the latest version of this, (which I believe
has been updated during 2005 - I know it's in the RMF libs, but I want the
latest version).
I can't get the web link to work, I get page not found. Is it on an FTP server
somewhere?
Cheers
Brian
This
In last two days, I got a lot of reply from you.
Charles' reply helps me to find the sample of IBM Simplified Chinese
Graphic Character Set DBCS-Host and DBCS-PC for 1993 version from below
link. Now I need the IBM Simplified Chinese Graphic Character Set of
DBCS-Host and DBCS-PC for 1997
Go through a SYSTRACE and parse out the trace entries of interest,
then do IP WHERES on the PSW addresses to get the displacements in the
modules. Generate side by side listing of trace entry, psw address, r15,
r0, r1 and the module name and displacement.
That is one thing I had written a verbx
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 11:59:58 +0100, Perryman, Brian wrote:
Anyone know where I can download the latest version of this, (which I
believe has been updated during 2005 - I know it's in the RMF libs, but I
want the latest version).
I can't get the web link to work, I get page not found. Is it on
John can u pass James Antognini article ?
John Krew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:After reading up on cross-memory services
(Extended Addressability Guide and the James Antognini
article), I have the following questions:
1. Assuming I want to connect only selected address spaces to the service
Well spotted Norbert!
That worked - many thanks!
Brian
-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Norbert Friemel
Sent: 26 September 2005 12:35
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: RMF PM Java Edition
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 11:59:58
Barbara Nitz wrote on 09/26/2005 07:13:24 AM:
Some have suggested that we add an option to WHERE,
filtering based on data type. The most common filter that has been
proposed is a MODULE data type filter. It would be interesting to hear
opinions on this suggestion from regular IBM-MAIN
From: Robert Wright
...
As you and others have described what you'd like SYSTRACE to do, SYSTRACE
would use module filtering in its calls to the WHERE service routine
because it would want answers pertaining to modules and would not be
interested in answers pertaining to AREAs or STRUCTUREs.
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/25/2005
at 10:38 PM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Ah! The JFFO instruction which appeared on the decsystem KA-10 in
1968 (according to an unscientific Google search). I suppose it's OK
for IBM to use it now, since any patent has presumably expired.
I'm
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/26/2005
at 11:51 AM, Hu Jun [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
And yet
óGú¡ · ° ¼ ° º ¼
There's nothing wrong with sending non-ASCII data, but there is
something wrong
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/25/2005
at 03:07 PM, Leonard Woren [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I was going to ask if someone could post the complete list, to avoid
50 followups with 1 each.
The standard way to handle that is to request private replies, then
post a summary. I doubt that there is a the
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/25/2005
at 07:32 PM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm not sure that convention, widespread as it is rises to the status
of standard.
Nor did I say that it did; in fact, I've been at shops where B was a
print class, although that breaks some of the IBM
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/25/2005
at 01:45 PM, Leonard Woren [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
(Of course you can support more users on Wylbur than on TSO ISPF --
it takes 5 times as long to get your work done using something as
primitive as Wylbur, so the machine doesn't get loaded up with all
those
In a recent note, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) said:
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 08:18:47 -0300
Ah! The JFFO instruction which appeared on the decsystem KA-10 in
1968 (according to an unscientific Google search). I suppose it's OK
for IBM to use it now, since any patent has presumably
snip
/snip
Say what are you and Jaffe doing working on Sunday?
They're not working - they do this for the pure joy of it. The fact that
somebody pays them money to do it is purely coincidental ... vbg,d,r
In a recent note, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) said:
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 08:44:41 -0300
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/25/2005
at 07:32 PM, Paul Gilmartin [log in to unmask] said:
I'm not sure that convention, widespread as it is rises to the status
of standard.
Nor did I say
Shane wrote on 09/26/2005 08:39:00 AM:
Now Bob, about some decent IPCS support for those GFS traces ...
Other than generic support in service aids components, I think that all GFS
trace data collection and formatting support is shipped via the VSM
component. Did you have something in mind that
From: Robert Wright
Other than generic support in service aids components, I think that all
GFS
trace data collection and formatting support is shipped via the VSM
component. Did you have something in mind that the service aids
components
could do to support such things better? Or do you
I t looks like zOS 1.7 and SMPE 3.4 are available for ordering thru
shopzseries a couple of days early.
I just ordered SMPE 3.4 without any problems.
--
Mark Jacobs
Technical Services
Time Customer Service, Tampa FL
Time Warner
--
Secrecy is the keystone of all tyranny. Not
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 04:28:09 -0500, Roger Lowe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 10:58:15 +0200, CAPRON Romain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to know if there is an XML parser available on z/OS?
Romain,
Have a look at
In a recent note, Edward E. Jaffe said:
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 22:02:44 -0700
In a recent note John Gilmore said:
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 02:18:15 +
provide an eponymous macro that does the same thing, albeit much more
slowly, on platforms that do not make FLOGR
Andy Robertson wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 04:28:09 -0500, Roger Lowe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 10:58:15 +0200, CAPRON Romain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to know if there is an XML parser available on z/OS?
Romain,
Have a look at
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
In a recent note, Edward E. Jaffe said:
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 22:02:44 -0700
In a recent note John Gilmore said:
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 02:18:15 +
provide an eponymous macro that does the same thing, albeit much more
slowly, on platforms that
From: Paul Gilmartin
I don't know where the z9 PoO is,
Jim Mulder posted a (PDF) link a couple of days back to the latest PoPs. I
made an unsuccessful search for a .boo equivalent this afternoon.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN
Hi guys,
Just a few corrections just morning:
a) My initially email was not an intent to flame IBM or BMC
b) I do not know Chris Craddock, Chris Blaicher or David Allen Gibbey Jnr.
What was my intention?
I did read the local news as explained in a previous email and I then
extracted some of
Thanks a lot for your answers!
I'll study the Enterprise Cobol Way...
Romain
-Message d'origine-
De : IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de
Steve Comstock
Envoyé : lundi 26 septembre 2005 16:09
À : IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Objet : Re: Is there any XML parser
Marcin,
I caught your post. Can you please tell me how to perform step 3 - recycle
empty tape?
I am new at this and I am not sure how.
Marcin Blaszczyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. list datasets form volume(832303)
2. try to recall all valid datasets
3. recycle empty tape
Mohd
Just a couple of years ago, our shop went to TSO because it realized
that it could drop its CICS license by dropping SYSD.
I still like to call ISPF, PDF. It works from the command line to
get it.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
The fundamental quantity for binary-search trees (BSTs) is Knuth's
q = floor[(log2(n + 1)],
where n is the number of internal nodes in some BST.
This value can be obtained perspicuously but vry slowly from a PL/I or C
statement of the form
q = floor(log2(n + 1)) ;
the evaliuation of
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Steve Comstock
Will the new instructions, and modifications to existing
instructions, introduced with the z9 series be retrofitted to
the earlier z800, z890, z900 and / or z990 series?
I don't know about that,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Edward E. Jaffe
Steve Comstock wrote:
Will the new instructions, and modifications to existing
instructions,
introduced with the z9 series be retrofitted to the earlier z800,
z890, z900 and / or z990
But seriously: You said existing closed datasets *should* have no
problems. I believe so. However I was asked can you *assure* it ?.
That's why I asked the question.
Things get more complicated, when PPRC-XD (I don't like it) is used.
100% assure? I don't want to take that risk. but I am
Bruce , Radoslav
XD ist just asynchronous PPRC - and there is no guarantee when and what
will be copied .
It may take more then just a few seconds after the WRITE that the
data is copied - depending on the load and the link capacitiy.
The good thing is - you can switch easily from PPRC-XD to
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Steve Comstock
Craddock, Chris wrote:
Will the new instructions, and modifications to existing instructions,
introduced with the z9 series be retrofitted to the earlier z800,
z890, z900 and / or z990 series?
I'm trying to vary a dasd device offline. It originally had ucat on it but
I moved (merged) and disconnected it. It has nothing on it any more but
SYS1.VVDS SYS1.VTOCIX (as well as USERCAT USERCAT.INDEX space). There
were also lnklst libs on it but I rebuilt lnklst, APF and LLA, etc. Now
I'm
My first reaction to the STFLE instruction was Archie Bunker (All in the
Family, Stifle yourself, Edith)
--
Bruce A. Black
Senior Software Developer for FDR
Innovation Data Processing 973-890-7300
personal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sales info: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tech support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web:
In a recent note, Edward E. Jaffe said:
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 08:52:20 -0700
But STFL is a privileged instruction (STFLE is not). Who issues the
original STFL? the operating system during IPL?
Yes. All z/OS and some OS/390 releases issue STFL at IPL time.
Does the OS then make
You might want to look at the catalog address space. It might still have
it.
Bill
Mainframe -
An obsolete device still used by thousands of obsolete companies, serving
billions of obsolete customers, and making huge obsolete profits, for
their obsolete shareholders. And this year's run
But STFL is a privileged instruction (STFLE is not). Who issues the
original STFL? the operating system during IPL?
Yes. All z/OS and some OS/390 releases issue STFL at IPL time.
Does the OS then make the result available to unprivileged programs
somewhere? (CVT?)
Yes. In PSA.
Bob
Did you close and unallocate the catalog from the CAS ? Even if you
rebuild the linklist I think XCFAS will still have an allocation to the
datasets.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bob Henry
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005
John,
I used the following to copy a .pdf to the spool. I don't think there are
any added CC's. When I pull the output off with an external writer I get the
1000 byte records, no CC. Are you using SDSF to look at the output? Are you
seeing SDSF's idea of how the data will be processed and
F catalog,unallocate(catalog_name)
original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Dean Montevago
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 12:34 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Can't vary offline
Did you close and unallocate the catalog from
STFL loads absolute location 200. See PoPs for mapping. Reply to me privately
and I will send you code that displays the bits there using the
descriptions from PoPs.
Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/26/2005 12:21 PM wrote
Does the OS then make the result available to unprivileged programs
Bob,
Issue SETPROG LNKLST,UNALLOCATE to have XCFAS remove its allocations from
all LINKLIST volumes and see if that clears it up for you.
If it does, then issue SETPROG LNKLST,ALLOCATE to put back the linklist
allocations that are presently in-use (for protection)... after you get the
offending
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 10:49:08 -0500, John Benik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a good general rule for configuring PAVs and Base Volumes. It
seems as though there are a number of ways that people have configured
this. Some have done it one for one, others have chosen 2 or more base
volumes
If this system is active is it advisable to do this ?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom Schmidt
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 12:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Can't vary offline
Bob,
Issue SETPROG
Yes. We had to do that on a production system here on Sunday morning.
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 13:19:59 -0400, Dean Montevago wrote:
If this system is active is it advisable to do this ?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Schmidt
Sent: Monday, September
I would like to relay what is real concerning zLinux costs and what is
theory or conjecture. I run a z/900-101 with one IFL along with my z/900-
101 and z/900-102 in a Parallel Sysplex.
First it makes no sense to bring up just 1-2 zLinux instances on an
Enterprise Server. To make it cost
Good morning,
we are working in catalog performance and we have read some post, zOS
DFSMS-Managing Catalogs and Cheryl Watson Tuning Letter 2001 - N1.
About following paragraph:
BUFND Specifies the number of buffers for transmitting data between virtual
and auxiliary storage. The default,
I searched the archives, and I can't find this, although I seem to remember
it being discussed. Is there a way to find all the name/token pairs defined
in a dump? I've looked at the IPCS guide, and I can't find anything
definitive.
Thanks in advance,
Wayne Driscoll
Product Developer
Western
Never mind, once I sat back and used common sense, I found it in the Showmvs
source (Thanks Roland), using ASCB-ASSB-NTTH-NTTE
Wayne Driscoll
Product Developer
Western Metal Supply
NOTE: All opinions are strictly my own.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
As you may have seen on CNN, we here in Houston have been a little busy
starting with over 200,000 unexpected guests in August. We barely got
that under control when we looked up and found Rita on our door step.
What can I do to get up to speed on the LMDS process?
X = SOAPBOX(ACTIVATE)
And
I tried all the suggestions - uncatalog from CAS, remove from LLA,
unallocate from XCFAS, displayed ASM, APF, etc. I even updated all asid's
to use current lnklst and undefined all old lists (original list had pds's
on volume I'm trying to vary). Nothing seems to remove it from *MASTER*.
Any
'uncatalog from CAS'. Have you unallocated from CAS?
F CATALOG,UNALLOCATE(catname)
Larry Crilley
Dino-Software, LLC
http://www.dino-software.com/
412-734-2853.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Thanks Jonathan, Chris, and Rob for your very comprehensive anwers!
What a great list!
John Krew
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN
One other item from Managing Catalogs:
Use VUNALLOCATE to unallocate all VVDSs. This might be necessary to
allow the VARY command to vary a volume offline. VVDSs remain
unallocated until you issue MODIFY CATALOG,NOVUNALLOCATE
Larry Crilley
Dino-Software, LLC
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Henry
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 11:05 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Can't vary offline
I'm trying to vary a dasd device offline. It originally had
ucat on it but
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 14:56:41 -0500, McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Henry
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 11:05 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Can't vary offline
I'm
Perhaps they mean the %STOP command (substitue your own command character
for %) isn't protected?
Debbie
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
My point is having done this (SETPROG LNKLST,UPDATE,JOB=* known to have
measurable risk but still widely practiced) still won't free up the volume.
The IPL link list is special.
LLA is not link list. Stopping LLA does not stop or free link list. Link
List is older and deeper magic than LLA
snip
I'm doing an analysis of one of our application programs. As part of this, I'm
seeing the COBOL code generate a lot of PACK/UNPACK instruction pairs.
Does anyone have an idea on the performance impact of all these (potential
millions of executions in a single run)?
/snip
A long time
Fair enough. We have manual management and technical review steps in our
otherwise fully automated process.
If you are really serious about wanting to make the process easier, you
can make a good start by not making it more complicated.
We are very grateful you have given us a way to manage
I have found that it is generally a waste of time trying to guess what
an auditor really wants to know. That is, it is not a reasonable
assumption that the auditor has phrased the question correctly. It has
been productive to keep asking for more details. Work with the auditor
to develop a
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruno Sugliani
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 3:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Can't vary offline
Try this
Do a UCB display
In order to be varied offline the user
Eh? At no point did Mr. Chase state that IBM would insist on any customer
adopting any process, merely that IBM would not assist in building an
automated solution that contained no human review. I suspect you may do as
you please, it's your dog.
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original
Wayne,
this is not the complete story but correct for an ASID.
EVCTNTTP NTTH for System Name/Token
ASSBNTTP NTTH for ASID Name/Token
STCBNTTP NTTH for TCB Name/Token
Showmvs doesn't deal with TCB token as it would almost report none because
there isn't such an
animal while ShowMvs run.
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 15:48:10 -0500, McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You DO play with fire, don't you? grin. The IPL LNKLST cannot be
closed. Therefore the DEB will exist until IPL. Therefore, EVEN IF THE
VOLUME IS OFFLINE, it is *possible* for this system to try to do I/O to
the offline
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 15:48:10 -0500, McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
You DO play with fire, don't you? grin. The IPL LNKLST cannot be
closed. Therefore the DEB will exist until IPL. Therefore, EVEN IF THE
VOLUME IS OFFLINE, it is *possible* for this system to
Point well taken. I should really have a look at the web process. It
may, in fact, be very satisfactory.
Mr Chase: I apologize. I am in error prejudging the process.
Hal Merritt.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Greg
On Sep 26, 2005, at 6:30 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/25/2005
at 01:45 PM, Leonard Woren [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
(Of course you can support more users on Wylbur than on TSO ISPF --
it takes 5 times as long to get your work done using something as
In a message dated 9/26/2005 4:57:10 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
They have some trouble try to recruit sysprogs to work on the
beast. I ran from the interview room (not literally ) .. now I remember
its called MUSIC . They have so much code (of their own) in it
This technique is especially handy if the existence of one or more of
the non-system LX routines can depend on parameter statements/options
for the software. Lumping it all together in one large System-LX might
not be the best option here.
True enough, unless you get creative with ESR-style
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruno Sugliani
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 4:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Can't vary offline
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 15:48:10 -0500, McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ed Gould wrote:
I don't recall the name of the (I think a Swedish developed program)
that was similar to Wylbur, but there is a large user of that still
here in Chicago. They are really stuck in the 60's they love the
product . They have some trouble try to recruit sysprogs to work on the
Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
OK, I admit my ignorance and beg for enlightenment: What is ESR-style
vectored linkage, or where could I learn about it for myself?
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/iea2a860/23.2.2
--
What is ESR-style vectored linkage?
ESR just stands for Extended Service Router. It originated as a way to
map multiple SVC functions into a single SVC number. SVC 109 is an
example.
There is no deep magic involved. Your PC maintains a table, potentially
a table of tables of tables... etc. Your
I'd like to add a few other thoughts onto of Mark's comments.
Yes, I do work for CA, and have supported MIM. Just a disclosure,
lest some people accuse me of hiding my true identity. I'm sure there
are some with some negative impressions of MIM; but I did want to mention
what our very large
On Sep 26, 2005, at 9:08 AM, Steve Comstock wrote:
Andy Robertson wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 04:28:09 -0500, Roger Lowe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 10:58:15 +0200, CAPRON Romain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to know if there is an XML parser available on z/OS?
On Sep 26, 2005, at 6:19 PM, Anne Lynn Wheeler wrote:
Ed Gould wrote:
I don't recall the name of the (I think a Swedish developed program)
that was similar to Wylbur, but there is a large user of that still
here in Chicago. They are really stuck in the 60's they love the
product . They have
Also consider the PL/I functions: PLISAXA, PLISAXB.
Go to...
http://www-306.ibm.com/software/awdtools/pli/plizos/
then to the Library side-bar, finally to the Language Reference.
Walter Rue
Roger Lowe wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 10:58:15 +0200, CAPRON Romain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
It depends but for us Yes. If 3 Linux images was to become 30 images for
production z/VM is mandatory since I don't have a z9 sitting around and we
run some other work.
What has not been mentioned is that if you don't have z/VM automation of
many images becomes much more complex. What's the
The formatting is excellent - the filtering is non-existent.
As I alluded earlier, the prime (extra) functionality I see as required
in
the field is the ability to identify storage leaks. An option to
eliminate all matched get-free pairs would go a *LONG* way to achieving
this goal.
I
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 19:59:17 -0700, Greg Dyck wrote:
I believe IBM research[ed] has dabbled with this, but it is a non-trivial
task to do by IBM or by others. Some of the complications that
immediately come to mind are being able to free 8 byte multiple of
storage at a time independent of the
Several comments on this:
First to Bob - thanks for the explanation. That explains why I get three
responses when I ask ip w for the cvtexit address. (Or why IPCS tells me
that an ASCB address is an ASCB.)
Shane, I don't think that IBM is implementing this yet, it was just a
request and Bob
Thanks. I presumed this, but haven't had any closer view of Linux
used on zSeries so Your opinion give a valuable confirmation.
Thomas Berg
== Knutson, Sam == wrote2005-09-27 03:58:
It depends but for us Yes. If 3 Linux images was to become 30 images for
production z/VM is
We had an excessive disabled spin loop due to an RSM bug that we didn't have
the fix for yet. So far, so bad.
As the person also responsible for system automation, I have been asked to
'automate iee178i' to 1. appear red on the console and 2. send an email when
the spin occurs.
When I looked at
89 matches
Mail list logo
