Hi all
Our shop is Z/OS 1.8. We want to implement HSMplex(4 members).we will
also implement DR in the future.
We are not sure whethere we need RLS for accessing the control data sets.
Could you tell us the advantage and disadvantage of RLS ? Is there any
limition for the HSM CDS managed
Hi all
Our shop is Z/OS 1.8. We want to implement HSMplex(4 members).we will also
implement DR in the future.
We are not sure whethere we need RLS for accessing the control data sets.
Could you tell us the advantage and disadvantage of RLS ? Is there any
limition for the HSM CDS
-- snip --
Our shop is Z/OS 1.8. We want to implement HSMplex(4 members).we will
also implement DR in the future.
We are not sure whethere we need RLS for accessing the control data sets.
Could you tell us the advantage and disadvantage of RLS ? Is there any
limition for the HSM CDS managed
On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 21:58 -0400, Pinnacle wrote:
As far as the mainframe skills shortage goes, I
can only conclude that IBM's refusal to make z/OS affordable for people to
run on their own hardware (like a PC) means that the only ones left with
enough wherewithal to employ and train
As I have lost my old valuable (some criminal have been there...) xrefs
for
what is now called CA-LIBRARIAN, I'm wondering if someone can either
point
me to a link that have the (batch) commands documented or can send me
the docs. I'm talking about commands/parms like -OPT GPO, -SCAN,
Ted, It monitors the syslog and performs actions based on messages or alerts.
We also use it to suppress messages and perform IPL functions. It also sends
emails out when it detects abends.
Bill Johnson
Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are looking at replacing Control-O
I always
Have you tried ADRDSSU DUMP/RESTORE? You didn't say how far one system is from
the other, but depending on the distance you can DUMP to a sequential dataset,
ftp it to remote system (binary) and then RESTORE. If both systems are in the
same datacenter I'd write it to tape or virtual tape.
http://www.share.org/client_files/proceedings/Anaheim_Mar2000/DATA/S3034
.PDF
Skip Robinson (SCE) presented a user experience at SHARE in March of
2000 Session 3034 RLS Marries HSM.
This has some good notes.
Skip might even chime in with any more recent experience.
Thanks, Sam
Shane wrote:
On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 21:58 -0400, Pinnacle wrote:
As far as the mainframe skills shortage goes, I
can only conclude that IBM's refusal to make z/OS affordable for people to
run on their own hardware (like a PC) means that the only ones left with
enough wherewithal to employ
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 06:03 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote:
I asked a couple of the speakers about FLEX, PSI,
Hercules, etc. conundrum. The response was, basically, my
lips are sealed with an implication that the issue will be
addressed, maybe even soon. But _no_ indication in which
direction
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote:
As I have lost my old valuable (some criminal have been there...) xrefs
for
what is now called CA-LIBRARIAN, I'm wondering if someone can either
point
me to a link that have the (batch) commands documented or can send me
the
- Original Message -
From: Shane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 4:46 AM
Subject: Re: IBM to the PCM market
On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 21:58 -0400, Pinnacle wrote:
As far as the mainframe skills shortage goes, I
can only conclude that
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Gould
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 7:30 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM to the PCM market
On Apr 3, 2007, at 5:11 PM, Marcia Harelik wrote:
IBM is not killing off
In a recent note, wtrovijo said:
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 08:26:00 -0300
Have you tried ADRDSSU DUMP/RESTORE? You didn't say how far one system is fr
om the other, but depending on the distance you can DUMP to a sequential dat
aset, ftp it to remote system (binary) and then RESTORE. If
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 8:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How to transfer PDSE libraries?
In a recent note, wtrovijo said:
Date: Wed, 4
Actually my 'Conspiracy theory' was meant to be tongue in cheek. I need
another 20+ years as a Mainframe sysprog before retirement so it better
last at least that long ...
-Original Message-
Marcia Harelik
IBM is not killing off the mainframe. Quite the contrary. What makes you
think
The CA web site has documentation you can download.
Liliane
At 05:31 AM 4/4/2007, you wrote:
As I have lost my old valuable (some criminal have been there...) xrefs
for
what is now called CA-LIBRARIAN, I'm wondering if someone can either
point
me to a link that have the (batch) commands
snip
Actually my 'Conspiracy theory' was meant to be tongue in cheek. I need
another 20+ years as a Mainframe sysprog before retirement so it better
last at least that long ...
/snip
Impudent youn whippersnapper!!! G
--
For
--snip-
Like a few others here on the list I'm pretty sure IBM must have an
emulation (simulation, whatever) product. Possibly just about to escape
from the labs into public view.
There is no way they can leave their own staff swinging in the
Thanks all that responded! :)
I got the Command ref in PDF and other manuals in Softcopy Librarian format.
(Which I'm trying to install.)
As the Command ref answers my current needs I'm afloat.
(CA site requires id and pswd that I didn't remember so I tried the fast
lane... :) )
On our boxes, the HMC has been on a private network, it's not exposed to
our LAN - which means I have to go into the data center to do HMC
functions of course. I was always wary of having my HMC on a network
visible to others - but it seems many are doing it.
What makes it secure enough for
in our case it's inside the firewall, so access is via vpn software that
can get inside of the firewall
Jack Kelly
LA Systems @ US Courts
x 202-502-2390
Tim Hare [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
04/04/2007 09:48 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 08:37:57 -0500, Rick Fochtman wrote:
on account of what Shane wrote:
--snip-
Like a few others here on the list I'm pretty sure IBM must have an
emulation (simulation, whatever) product. Possibly just about to escape
from the
Rick Fochtman wrote:
--snip-
Like a few others here on the list I'm pretty sure IBM must have an
emulation (simulation, whatever) product. Possibly just about to
escape from the labs into public view.
There is no way they can leave their own
John,
Do you want to know what the real difference is between JBOSS and WAS
besides the cost: JBOSS WORKS!!!
And i am not joking. I have not had any luck with any of the WAS
appservers except for the freebee IBM gives called 'Community Edition'
which is really a suped up version of TOMCAT.
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 08:57 -0500, Tom Schmidt wrote:
Given that the FLEX-ES licenses expired last October
and given that Early Support Programs are (lately anyway) often 6 months in
duration...
I take it that the commercial FLEX licenses were for 3 years - don't
know about the PID
Tim,
We are using the same Firewall/VPN solution here as well.
Brad S. Carson
Manager z/Series Technical Support
Enterprise Systems
Laboratory Corporation of America
(336) 436-8294
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 4/4/2007 9:55 AM
in our case it's inside the firewall, so access is via vpn software
that
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 09:55:00 -0400, Jack Kelly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in our case it's inside the firewall, so access is via vpn software that
can get inside of the firewall
Jack Kelly
LA Systems @ US Courts
x 202-502-2390
Same here. I might add that this is our DR machine in our remote
On 3 Apr 2007 14:54:28 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Gilmartin)
wrote:
Ah, but it was easier to migrate from Studebaker to Rambler or
Dodge than from z/OS to Windows. In the most ruthless scenario,
the vendor continues to serve an ever-dwindling captive customer
base at ever-increasing unit
On Apr 4, 2007, at 8:05 AM, McKown, John wrote:
---SNIP---
Marcia,
They killed off TSO didn't they?
Ed
TSO is still here. Granted it is now really only a platform to support
ISPF. But ISPF is getting new goodies fairly regularly. I mean,
I doubt it. Someone on this very list -- Phil Payne, maybe? -- has pointed out
that mainframe software margins are a large part of the total profit IBM rakes
in.
Jon
snip
I suspect instead, it wants us to have huge, secure, database machines
that are fast and use up less energy than Windows
Our HMC is inside our internal network. If I am not at work, I can access
it via our VPN.
Access to the HMC itself is protected by Userid and Passwords defined on
the HMC. The IBM provided default userids and passwords are marked as not
being eligible for remote access.
Thanks
Bill Bishop
In a recent note, Howard Brazee said:
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 08:19:56 -0600
I suspect instead, it wants us to have huge, secure, database machines
that are fast and use up less energy than Windows farms - ...
If we get to the stage where we don't care about the OS (just as Mac
We do not allow remote access to our production cec. That is just a little
too scary for me.
I don't see why!
IGS, Canada did for many customers.
They encouraged staff to work from home.
So, a VPN/Firewall/Certificate solution was used by the support staff to update
HMC parms remotely.
-
Too
Software margins are higher than hw margins. Any software that IBM sells,
not just mf sw, will yield more profit than selling hw. IBM is certainly
not acting like a company that wants to divest itself of a product line
such as the mainframe. Acquisitions like Candle, Vanguard and Consul
I have to admit.. I find this all pretty depressing.
Initially, I thought IBM was right to trounce PSI. The thought of
someone muscling in on z's bread-and-butter seemed ludicrous.
However, with the Flex deal falling, no emulator type access allowed...
the future looks dim indeed.
I consider
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 08:57:33 -0500, Tom Schmidt wrote:
IBM traditionally makes hardware announcements of that ilk around the May or
September timeframe.
...snip...
But if I was going to be pinned to a date I would put it towards the end of
May (22nd or 29th). (May 15th would make me wrong I
Trying to get secure FTP running, getting
FC0702 authServer: secure_socket_init failed with rc = 438 (Internal
error reported by remote partner)
Any clues?
Thanks.
NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are
intended exclusively
for the individual or entity
I use to TERSE the sequential file from ADRDSSU, ftp it, UNTERSE it and
then restore. I found it very nice, much more convenient than xmit. If
I remember correctly it even does VSAM but its been awhile so I'm not
sure. There was some operand on the restore to allow me to change the
name of the
Hi.
Can I modify the VTOC to change the attributes of a file? .. how?
Someone has done it ..?
I will be grateful for any help.
Thanks.
Alvaro.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
We use a private network for such. The private network is bridged from
the remote site to the local site giving us full remote control.
We actually use two private networks. The most loved CEC is isolated.
We are considering a VPN type solution for external access. We
experimented with dial
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alvaro Quintupray B.
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 10:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: ADR793E -PDSE indicators in the VTOC and VVDS do not match
Hi.
Can I modify the VTOC
On Apr 4, 2007, at 6:26 AM, wtrovijo wrote:
Have you tried ADRDSSU DUMP/RESTORE? You didn't say how far one
system is from the other, but depending on the distance you can
DUMP to a sequential dataset, ftp it to remote system (binary) and
then RESTORE. If both systems are in the same
I am the first one to admit that IBM has made some monumental blunders
vis-a-vis mainframes and the market place. But to state that they are
deliberately and intentionally doing anything to harm the market is ludicrous.
The fight with PSI is all about whether or not the platform that runs
From: Schramm, Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would ask all of the listers to strongly indicate to their IBM reps
that the lack of a strong developer population for z/OS will ultimately
lead to it's demise. The ability to develop on the platform at a
reasonable cost, keeps the platform viable.
I know
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 10:57:45 -0500, Alvaro Quintupray B. wrote:
Can I modify the VTOC to change the attributes of a file? .. how?
What release of z/OS are you currently operating?
--
Tom Schmidt
Madison, WI
--
For
ZOS 1.6
Atte.
Alvaro
-Mensaje original-
De: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de
Tom Schmidt
Enviado el: Miércoles, 04 de Abril de 2007 12:49
Para: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Asunto: Re: ADR793E -PDSE indicators in the VTOC and VVDS do not match
On Wed, 4
I'm with you, Shane. I can tell already that the wrong people at IBM are
listening.
It doesn't matter what marketing types say, just what executive management
does.
Tom Moulder
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Shane
Sent:
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 12:54:39 -0400, Alvaro Quintupray wrote:
-Mensaje original-
De: IBM Mainframe Discussion List En nombre de Tom Schmidt
Enviado el: Miércoles, 04 de Abril de 2007 12:49
Asunto: Re: ADR793E -PDSE indicators in the VTOC and VVDS do not match
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 10:57:45
NOTICE:
All information in and attached to the e-mail(s) below may be proprietary,
confidential, privileged and otherwise protected from improper or erroneous
disclosure. If you are not the sender's intended recipient, you are not
authorized to intercept, read, print, retain, copy, forward, or
snip
However the (internal) IBM licenses were for 12 months, and they have
been falling off since last November. I know some IBM folks that have
laptops that are now somewhat less useful than they were.
Something has to pop out of the woodwork - sooner rather than later is
my guess.
Shane ...
IBM has had one big problem.not intouch with the
peopletokenring/os2 just a couple items they messed up...
only if the $ did not get in front of them they would have had all the
$ they wanted...Uguess what marketing group did that for
someone back in early 80's...
I was just thinking while reading Marcia's post quoted below that what she said
made a lot of sense. Then I noticed what could be a bias, as she works for
IBM. Actually, what she said still makes sense. Is she taking over for
Timothy Sipples?
The one thing about the whole Flex-ES thing
On 4 Apr 2007 09:44:38 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Day) wrote:
If PSI wins, and IBM is forced to license z/OS on any platform, who is going
to be driving the train?
Someone has to. In my opinion, what will kill the mainframe is if the market
becomes a commodities
market where anyone can
David Day says
I am the first one to admit that IBM has made some monumental
blunders
vis-a-vis mainframes and the market place. But to state that they are
deliberately and intentionally doing anything to harm the market is
ludicrous.
I don't think anyone really believes they are
I have a possibility of a long 3 year contract as a sysprog in another state.
I was wondering how other people set a rate, and what they do about the house
they own.
As long as I am a contractor, I don't want to sell my house in the Milwaukee
area. Since the last contract job I was on (my
On 4 Apr 2007 07:29:23 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jon Brock) wrote:
snip
I suspect instead, it wants us to have huge, secure, database machines
that are fast and use up less energy than Windows farms - and IBM
doesn't care how we choose to display the data on our desktops. And
it would be quite
Somewhere along the line I had heard that ADRDSSU uses other IBM
utilities to access various datasets. Like IDCAMS for vsam datasets
and IEBCOPY for PDS(e)'s *IF* that is the case then why not use
IEBCOPY ?
Ed
The idea of using DUMP/RESTORE was just because it's easier to dump
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 17:11:06 -0500, Marcia Harelik wrote:
IBM is not killing off the mainframe. Quite the contrary. What makes you
think that? IBM is investing deeply in technology improvements and
advancements.
Ten years ago, IBM said they were not killing off OS/2.
Today, IBM is most
Howard Brazee wrote:
OK, as long as it uses its system.Customers aren't interested in
operating systems. Customers are interested in the total cost of the
whole package. Now, IBM has to take extra care to not be bundling,
but it can work with partners to do this.We want a secure,
Am interested in knowing if most people still IPL for time change - spring and
fall - and if anyone does not, how they handle this.
Thanks, Tom
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Day
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 12:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: IBM to the PCM market(the sky is falling!!!the sky is
falling!!)
SNIP
It is surely true that IBM has been
Am interested in knowing if most people still IPL for time change - spring
and
fall - and if anyone does not, how they handle this.
Thanks, Tom
We did something interesting, and had an interesting problem as a result.
Because of
data center consolidation we had mainframes in the same room
This is really a [EMAIL PROTECTED] guess here, and may need Mark Thomen to
chime
in here.
It sounds like you might have a duplicate NVR in the VVDS on the volume. Try
to salvage what you can from the PDSE in question by copying it to another
dataset with a different name on a different
Thomas Raskin wrote:
Am interested in knowing if most people still IPL for time change - spring and
fall - and if anyone does not, how they handle this.
We would never IPL for anything so trivial. In our case, we simply issue
'SET TIMEZONE=' twice per year to change local time by one hour.
On 4/4/07, Lance Kopplin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am interested in knowing if most people still IPL for time change -
spring
and
fall - and if anyone does not, how they handle this.
Thanks, Tom
Simply SET CLOCK=xxx then change CLOCKxx in parmlib just in case we
do IPL.
--
Mark
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 11:45:37 -0600, David Day wrote:
... In my opinion, what will kill the mainframe is if the market becomes a
commodities market where anyone can buy a $500 pc and get a license to run
z/OS.
Funny, that is pretty close to the market that pushed OS/2 out of the way
and
I am using RACF. I am running traces. The only trace entries are:
234 Security environment established - ready for negotiation
FC0702 authServer: secure_socket_init failed with rc = 438
EZA2897I Authentication negotiation failed
I sure wished the fine doc were usable. IBM searches also
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Raskin
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 12:41 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Time Change at IPL
Am interested in knowing if most people still IPL for time
change - spring
snip
Am interested in knowing if most people still IPL for time
change - spring and
fall - and if anyone does not, how they handle this.
snip
The problem is not simply changing the time. The 'set timezone' parm [et
al] makes this rather painless.The change is especially easy in the spring
NOTICE:
All information in and attached to the e-mail(s) below may be proprietary,
confidential, privileged and otherwise protected from improper or erroneous
disclosure. If you are not the sender's intended recipient, you are not
authorized to intercept, read, print, retain, copy, forward, or
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 12:40:36 -0500, Thomas Raskin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am interested in knowing if most people still IPL for time change - spring and
fall - and if anyone does not, how they handle this.
Thanks, Tom
I would like to take this question one step further - for any shop that
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 13:39:05 -0500, Patrick Lyon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 12:40:36 -0500, Thomas Raskin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am interested in knowing if most people still IPL for time change - spring and
fall - and if anyone does not, how they handle this.
Thanks, Tom
I
May I posit this theory? In the market today are 3 kinds of computers:
Intel-based, Unix-based, and the MF. Each of these is designed to do
certain kinds of task and have certain strengths. To use a sports analogy,
the Intel-based computers win the 100-yard dash. They are built for speed.
-Original Message-
From: Marcia Harelik
SNIP
It's all about right fit and balanced workload within an IT environment.
What's the tipping point? When should a company move from Unix to MF? Or
from Intel to Unix? What's the right mix of computers and TCO? Really hard
UNSNIP
I think you
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marcia Harelik
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 1:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM to the PCM market(the sky is falling!!!the sky is
falling!!)
SNIP
Getting back to Steve's point
Hal
Have you followed the Google trail? If so, what were your results?
I just have. The only reference to the character string Internal error
reported by remote partner associated with the code 438 is in a manual
Websphere MQ for z/OS Messages and Codes, Version 6.0, GC34-6602-00.
Following
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Thompson, Steve
[ snip ]
Sometimes I think IBM couldn't market ice-cubes to dwellers
of the Sahara desert.
But maybe in acre-foot chunks, or whole icebergs.
-jc-
CA Top Secret supports member level security in a PDS or PDSE, allowing a
variance of access authority to users of the dataset versus an individual
member. We have that plugged in. A few months ago, there was a problem
that led me to open an issue with Top Secret to verify what they do, and
On Apr 4, 2007, at 12:40 PM, wtrovijo wrote:
Somewhere along the line I had heard that ADRDSSU uses other IBM
utilities to access various datasets. Like IDCAMS for vsam datasets
and IEBCOPY for PDS(e)'s *IF* that is the case then why not use
IEBCOPY ?
Ed
The idea of using DUMP/RESTORE was
Tom Schmidt wrote:
Funny, that is pretty close to the market that pushed OS/2 out of the way
and brought us Microsoft's Windows.
ISTM IBM should learn from the OS/2 fiasco and do unto MS what MS did unto
IBM (with Windows). Why shouldn't z/OS be able to compete with MS Vista?
(How in
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Gould
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 2:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How to transfer PDSE libraries?
snip
True but IEHMOVE does this as well . The output is 80/800
RACF does not protect individual members - and I don't see how Top Secret
does either. SAF is called from OPEN, which is a dataset-level, not
member-level function. Top Secret could of course intercept BLDL and STOW
to provide some sort of member security - but I think those intercepts
[ snip ]
Sometimes I think IBM couldn't market ice-cubes to dwellers
of the Sahara desert.
But maybe in acre-foot chunks, or whole icebergs.
After all, not all companies need an iceberg and companies that market to
industries that use icebergs don't need access to a small iceberg to
Which is a good reason for IBM to not be in the business of selling an
operating system.
And, what would you use to run all your mainframe apps and sub-systems on?
Air?
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN
I have a client that wants to move from Faver to
ADRDSSU. A question arose re the reorging of VSAM
files. The question is. Using ADRDSSU for Backup and
Restore, will the files be reorged on the Retore?
The manual states fairly clearly that using ADRDSSU to
COPY files will reult in a reorg, could
Steve,
RACF does not support member-level protection. It was widely discussed
several times on RACF-L. IBM claims such protection can be circumvented
(which I agree), however it's not easy (and maybe that's why it would be
worth to be implemented).
An exemption from Security Administrator
Marcia,
You are addressing only one facet of the situation, one that does make
economic sense for businesses, and I have no quibble with that. (Although,
as Steve further expanded, RAS comes into play, and maybe the mainframe
entry point should be lower than it is currently perceived).
But by
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Alan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM to the PCM market(the sky is falling!!!the sky is falling !!)
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 15:52:35 -0400
[ snip ]
Sometimes I think IBM couldn't market ice-cubes to
Didn't StorageTek market Iceberg already?
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Alan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM to the PCM market(the sky is falling!!!the sky is falling !!)
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 15:52:35 -0400
[ snip ]
Sometimes
We IPL once per month, so in the Spring and Fall we do the monthly IPL
at time change, and use IEASYS CLOCk=DT/CT for Daylight Time/Central
Time to set the TIMEZONE offset.
Regards, Mac.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
Why not?
Grrr.
-- gil
--
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 3:15 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Delete alias in DSLIST?
Why not?
Grrr.
Uh? What did you try? And do you mean a dataset
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Why not?
Line command DEL / ALIAS PURGE works for catalog aliases. Haven't tried
it for dataset aliases because we don't have any.
-jc-
We have been using RLS for our HSM CDS's for over 8 years. It is very
beneficial for a sysplex when there are more than 3 systems in the
sysplex. With less than 3, there are not as many benefits.
There are 2 main benefits 1) Things like Autobackup, Primary Space
Management, EXPIREBV, RECYCLE,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ray Mullins
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 3:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM to the PCM market(the sky is falling!!!the sky is
falling!!)
SNIP
P.S. And to someone who mentioned
On 4 Apr 2007 12:59:00 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ted MacNEIL)
wrote:
Which is a good reason for IBM to not be in the business of selling an
operating system.
And, what would you use to run all your mainframe apps and sub-systems on?
Air?
The OS is a tool for that IBM uses to produce its real
Steve,
About 3 years ago, when I worked at CIMS Lab, Inc. (now part of IBM as
Tivoli UAM) and got a FLEX-ES through PWD, we were told explicitly what I
mentioned, by both resellers.
Later,
Ray
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 15:19:36 -0500, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Why not?
Line command DEL / ALIAS PURGE works for catalog aliases. Haven't tried
it for dataset aliases because we don't have
Eric,
Go to Realrates.com
For a idea on what others are getting.
Kevin
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
