Hi,
I would like to allocate memory in Common Data Space with DSPSERV Macro and
my requirement is that Data Space survive my Address Space Termination. That
means it remains allocatad after my AS ends and other Address Spaces or an
Exit-Routine can access it.
One of my trial was, to allocate CDS
I have a REXX which builds a member list and uses EXECIO to write each
member preceded by a ./ADD card for IEBUPDTE.
After the flat file is edited, simply use IEBUPDTE to add the members back
to the PDS using the flat file as input.
I can post the source or email it to the OP.
On 7/24/07, Ear
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
The oft-mentioned IBM WebSphere Developer for System z (WDz) performs
excellent COBOL syntax validation on your PC.
http://www.ibm.com/software/awdtools/devzseries/
You can see some recorded demonstrations which include syntax checking
here:
http://websphere.dfw.ibm.com/whidemo/atdemo_wsed_zosad
On Jul 24, 2007, at 10:36 PM, Wayne Driscoll wrote:
All programs in the linklist are accessible directly, what is the
possible value of protecting (from read, update protection is
mandatory)
a linklist dataset? I mean if I can execute tso iefbr14, what is the
drawback of me executing tso cal
William Richter writes:
>Internal customers do not ask your question, "How do you measure the total
>performance of the whole IT organization?"
>They are really only interested in the total cost of acquistion or
internal
>chargeback (excluding power and environmentals) and application
performance.
On Jul 24, 2007, at 11:25 PM, Bill Seubert wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 07:30:36 -0500, William Richter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Timothy,
Internal customers do not ask your question, "How do you measure
the total
performance of the whole IT organization?"
They are really only interested
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 07:30:36 -0500, William Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Timothy,
>
>Internal customers do not ask your question, "How do you measure the total
>performance of the whole IT organization?"
>
>They are really only interested in the total cost of acquistion or internal
>chargeb
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Gould" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 8:36 PM
Subject: Z/Journal issue June/July 2007
Today I was at another doctors office waiting for my appointment and was
surprised when I saw that Xephon was now ap
- Original Message -
From: "Timothy Sipples" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 9:38 PM
Subject: Wall Street Journal: "The Dynosaurs That Won't Die"
"Mainframe computers are the dinosaurs of the technology world, giant
beasts that ruled d
Hi,
I vaguely remember such a requirement. The code went something like this :
#IF RUNNING-IN-CICS
#EXEC CICS LINK UTILPROG
#END-IF
#IF RUNNING-IN-BATCH
# CALL UTILPROG
#END-IF
The main program was some sort of generic driver type of program which
required invocation of UTILPROG. They ev
On Jul 24, 2007, at 10:04 PM, Kenneth E Tomiak wrote:
Not interested. There are many solutions out there that can effect
a change
to every member in a PDS and most are FREE.
Yea but are they supported 24x7 ? Or do you get a response well maybe
in the next few weeks I will get a chance
All programs in the linklist are accessible directly, what is the
possible value of protecting (from read, update protection is mandatory)
a linklist dataset? I mean if I can execute tso iefbr14, what is the
drawback of me executing tso call 'sys1.linklib(iefbr14)' Why would
allowing the second b
On Jul 24, 2007, at 8:10 PM, Lindy Mayfield wrote:
If it seems I'm picking nits then just ignore me. (-: But I've
been following this and trying to understand it and to be honest it
doesn't always make sense.
May I ask, do you mean that IBM is being a jerk about FLEX because
of the FSI s
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:01:59 +0200, Albert Klimek
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Asked about compiling parts of a source cobol program.
Never had the need to. Interested in hearing why you can not use IF
statements to avoid execting parts of code you are not interested in. Using an
edit macro to
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:53:14 -0400, Earnie Allen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>1. Use the REVIEW command processor from the CBT tape, with the OFFLOAD
>subcommand, to create the flat file.
>
>2. Do whatever edit(s) you need to do.
>
>3. Use the PDSLOAD batch processor, also from the CBT tape, to r
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:28:56 -0400, WalterR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>I have an REXX exec that does the process, but it is not set up to run as a
>>batch job. Would that it were ... sigh.
>>
>>I have come across the CBT FILE093 solution(s) --- but, there appear to be
>>many varieties.
>>
>>
On Jul 24, 2007, at 7:44 AM, McKown, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carroll, William
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 7:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Secure clist
Is there any way to secure certain clist f
"Mainframe computers are the dinosaurs of the technology world, giant
beasts that ruled data centers in a bygone era. But don’t laugh if your
company’s chief information officer tells you he’s investing in a mainframe
all over again. Not only did the technology never go extinct, it’s making a
comeb
Earnie Allen wrote:
I am in need of a fairly straightforward method of turning a PDS into a
flat file (for modifications) and then back into a PDS. Having the
original ISPF stats present in the final PDS is not necessarily a critical
part of the process for us --- nice, but not absolutely neces
If it seems I'm picking nits then just ignore me. (-: But I've been following
this and trying to understand it and to be honest it doesn't always make sense.
May I ask, do you mean that IBM is being a jerk about FLEX because of the FSI
situation?
In other words, is this true: IBM had a prob
Today I was at another doctors office waiting for my appointment and
was surprised when I saw that Xephon was now apart of Z/Journal.
So now if you have a complaint you can complain to IBM (not sure if
this is good or not).
Also, in Pete Clarks column there is a interesting discussion about
Andy Wood wrote:
Decimal 10 or X'0A', which will show up in some places as X'A0'. By my way
of thinking, key X'10' is an invalid key rather than a way of describing
key 1.
Understood. I was confused because storage keys are often (usually?)
presented as two hex digits. For example, in dump
Hi Howard,
I got this example working :
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/igy3pg32/2.3.2.3.1?SHELF=&DT=20061117131343
I extended the above example by having a procedural COBOL program
calling OO COBOL which invoked the Java class. That worked too. I am
currently tryin
Dave Kopischke wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:28:52 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
You can use do it with a monitor like MXI (very easy using MXI) or use IPCS.
Check the archives. You can implement and backout via SET DIAG=xx. If
you are already running z/OS 1.8 you can do it now. Even before z/
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:55:34 -0700, Edward Jaffe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Key 10? Do you mean key x'A0' i.e., b'1010', which really is a user
>key? Or do you mean key x'10' i.e., b'0001' which isn't a user key
>at all. Out of curiosity, which software products allocate CSA in keys A-F?
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:28:52 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
>>>
>>> The default was changed to ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO) in z/OS 1.9.
>>
>>Hopefully there's a recommendation and procedure to check for this prior to
>>making the jump ??? Something non-catastrophic that doesn't require an IPL
>>to get out of
Andy Wood wrote:
If your intention is to pre-empt ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO) problems, then you
should consider the possibility that something may be allocating CSA in a user
key other than 8. Because it is so easy to allocate key 8 CSA accidentally,
that is by far the most likely one you are going to
If your intention is to pre-empt ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO) problems, then you
should consider the possibility that something may be allocating CSA in a user
key other than 8. Because it is so easy to allocate key 8 CSA accidentally,
that is by far the most likely one you are going to find. However, I
For the first part,
IP VERBX VSMDATA 'GLOBal SUMMary'
followed by
F '/ 8'
might be easier to deal with.
Bob
Mark Zelden wrote:
...
So I searched the archives... and I couldn't find anything on using IPCS
to do this (cookbook approach). So what would one do if they didn't have
MXI or Omegam
Firefox has an add-in called "IE Tab" which will open a URL with IE as
the rendering engine. It works with Windows Update and other IE-oriented
pages flawlessly.
Cheers,
Steve Samson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 23 Jul 2007 17:05:35 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ed Gould)
wrote:
There is an opti
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:28:52 -0500, Mark Zelden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>You can use do it with a monitor like MXI (very easy using MXI) or use IPCS.
>Check the archives.
So I searched the archives... and I couldn't find anything on using IPCS
to do this (cookbook approach). So what would o
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 11:04:35 -0500, Paul Gilmartin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...
>>Minor chide: It is too bad that folks take their valuable time on ibm-
main
>>
>Cf. the "Heresy" thread.
Ah, but that thread allowed us to streach our pedantry muscles,
an invaluable service for system programm
Ooops makes sense.
Earnie Allen
Senior Systems Programmer
MVS Systems Software
WORLDSPAN, LP
Phone: 404-322-2799 FAX: 404-322-4653
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remember: It takes teamwork to make the dream work.
A. I've used that one. Alias 'REV'..
Real handy ... especially for VSAM.
How does it work in conjunction with OFFLMOD/REVLMOD?
Earnie Allen
Senior Systems Programmer
MVS Systems Software
WORLDSPAN, LP
Phone: 404-322-2799 FAX: 404-322-4653
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remember: It take
In a message dated 7/24/2007 1:43:48 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Actually x'00' disconnects until position is just before index point so
the following search Id starts with
index point count at 1, maximum scan for the Id will be one revolution
till next time i
---
I have found copies in-shop of OFFLMOD and REVLMOD (from File134, I would
imagine) and they have fairly "recent" linkedit dates.
Perhaps these will assist in the project.
Only if you're processing load modules.
--
-
What does that "REVIEW command processor" do?
-
It's basically a PDS browser, started from a command line.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive ac
Actually x'00' disconnects until position is just before index point so
the following search Id starts with
index point count at 1, maximum scan for the Id will be one revolution
till next time index point is detected.
Using x'FF' will not disconnect and search id starts at current
positio
I have found copies in-shop of OFFLMOD and REVLMOD (from File134, I would
imagine) and they have fairly "recent" linkedit dates.
Perhaps these will assist in the project.
Earnie Allen
Senior Systems Programmer
MVS Systems Software
WORLDSPAN, LP
Phone: 404-322-2799 FAX: 404-322-4653
E-Mail: [E
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:47:25 -0500, Dave Kopischke
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:03:16 -0400, Jim Mulder wrote:
>
>>
>> The default was changed to ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO) in z/OS 1.9.
>>
>
>
>Now I've got some work to do.
>
>Hopefully there's a recommendation and procedure to che
In a message dated 7/24/2007 1:12:43 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Using a sector number of x'00' effectively disabled RPS on devices that
did care.
Not true. It forces the controller to position the track at index point,
the very beginning of the track. A
On 24 Jul 2007 at 05:05, concerning "Tools for Validating COBOL
Source", Lizette Koehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote to IBM-Main:
> [snip] a programmer stated that the PERFORM THRU
> EXIT was not functioning [snip] I felt it was a missing IF
> END-IF combo. [snip]
> So, does anyone know of a t
Using a sector number of x'00' effectively disabled RPS on devices
that did care.
Edward Jaffe wrote:
Richards.Bob wrote:
Do you know of any DASD subsystem that does not publish RPM information?
I thought not. They still "care".
But kidding aside, I would suspect the last time it "really
Earnie Allen of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List
wrote on 07/24/2007 12:53:14 PM:
> I have CBT471.FILE093 and it contains OFFLOADW and PDSLOADW.
>
> That basically the same?
>
Yes, the "W" suffix was added to the source code member to denote wide
record (>80 bytes) support. You can linkedit th
On 23 Jul 2007 17:05:35 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ed Gould)
wrote:
>There is an option in SAFARI to imitate IE if you are desperate
>enough. I have (I am using SAFARI) run across pages that were coded
>*ONLY* to work in IE. Usually I write the name of the company down
>and then boycott their
In a message dated 7/24/2007 11:14:10 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Because the fetch and the store are separated in time. Another CPU or an
I/O operation can store into the byte *after* your CPU fetches the byte
but *before* your CPU stores the byte. The other CPU
I have CBT471.FILE093 and it contains OFFLOADW and PDSLOADW.
That basically the same?
--
Try this:
1. Use the REVIEW command processor from the CBT tape, with the OFFLOAD
subcommand, to create the flat file.
2. Do whatever edit(s) you need to do.
3. Use the
On 24 Jul 2007 04:40:00 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>a lot of stuff written for mainframe involves business critical
>dataprocessing ... which is significantly more effort than
>a standard application. our rule-of-thumb has been that to
>take a well-tested, well-debugged application
Dave Kopischke wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:03:16 -0400, Jim Mulder wrote:
The default was changed to ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO) in z/OS 1.9.
Now I've got some work to do.
Hopefully there's a recommendation and procedure to check for this prior to
making the jump ??? Something non-cata
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:03:16 -0400, Jim Mulder wrote:
>
> The default was changed to ALLOWUSERKEYCSA(NO) in z/OS 1.9.
>
Now I've got some work to do.
Hopefully there's a recommendation and procedure to check for this prior to
making the jump ??? Something non-catastrophic that doesn't require
I encountered a similar situation a couple of years ago -- found that our SDSP
datasets were defined (in 1996) with secondary allocation quantity greater
than zero; SDSP dataset(s) had never been re-org'ed, and had reached max
123 extents.
Also found statement that SDSP should have secondary al
On 24 Jul 2007 00:50:49 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>Or, write your COBOL function as OO COBOL function. Then, you have a
>whole object to give and take than just a few native arguments.
I spent a month trying to compile & run OO CoBOL on the mainframe
before giving up a couple of
David,
I looked at the SYS1.SAMPLIB(ARCSTRST) which had the define cluster.
Thanks for pointing it out to me. I had missed that.
"O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Esmie,
See SYS1.SAMPLIB(ARCSTRST) look for ALLOSDSP.
Better yet see if you have HSM.SAMP
>Does anyone know for sure which was the last DASD subsystem that cared about
>Rotational Positional Sensing (RPS) values?
I would guess 3390-SLEDS connected to 3990-6's.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subs
IIRC? I'll have to look that one up.
Earnie Allen
Senior Systems Programmer
MVS Systems Software
WORLDSPAN, LP
Phone: 404-322-2799 FAX: 404-322-4653
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remember: It takes teamwork to make the dream work.
>My situation is that I need to take current production JCLlib(s) and modify
>the ACCT info in each not the same change to all jobcards.
IIRC, the PDS command from the CBT can do that.
I seem to remember doing something similar a long time ago.
So, I would copy the JCLLIB, make the
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:36:06 -0400, Earnie Allen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>That PDS86 solution looks great ... if only all our production jobs had a
>standard ACCT field/info in them already!!! But, alas, that's what this
>process is intended to do.
>
As I said... if it is more complicated th
That PDS86 solution looks great ... if only all our production jobs had a
standard ACCT field/info in them already!!! But, alas, that's what this
process is intended to do.
Earnie Allen
Senior Systems Programmer
MVS Systems Software
WORLDSPAN, LP
Phone: 404-322-2799 FAX: 404-322-4653
E-Mail:
What does that "REVIEW command processor" do?
Earnie Allen
Senior Systems Programmer
MVS Systems Software
WORLDSPAN, LP
Phone: 404-322-2799 FAX: 404-322-4653
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remember: It takes teamwork to make the dream work.
Phil Kingston wrote:
Hi again,
I'm trying to write a TSO command processor which seems to be getting
addressability issues over 4095 bytes, e.g ASMA034E message.
I know there's a way of extending the addressability, but can't
remember.
Anyone know how to do it?
Ps. The IBM message for ASMA03
In a message dated 7/24/2007 11:16:19 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>-
Does anyone know for sure which was the last DASD subsystem that cared
about Rotational Positional Sensing (RPS) values?
--
II
-
I am in need of a fairly straightforward method of turning a PDS into a
flat file (for modifications) and then back into a PDS. Having the
original ISPF stats present in the final PDS is not necessarily a
critical part of the process for us --- nice, bu
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:08:43 -0400, Earnie Allen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Getting lots of suggestions/ideas. Gonna take me a bit to sort them out.
>
>My situation is that I need to take current production JCLlib(s) and modify
>the ACCT info in each not the same change to all jobcards.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Greg Lang
>
> Would someone be willing to provide the IBMLINK problem phone
> number ??
1-800-543-3912.
-jc-
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / sign
1-800-543-3912 at least that what is says on my screen.
Greg Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
07/24/2007 09:10 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
[IBM-MAIN] IBMLINK help phone number
Would som
Would someone be willing to provide the IBMLINK problem phone number ??
Thanks.
Greg Lang / AT&T Inc.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MA
-
Does anyone know for sure which was the last DASD subsystem that cared
about Rotational Positional Sensing (RPS) values?
--
IIRC, that would be the 3390 (real, not emulated). To my knowledge, none
of the RAID configurations c
There's no obvious way for an unauthorized program to discover that
information.
If you're a supervisor state program you can issue a TPROT with a key of
0. If the condition code is 1 then the page is protected. The
interpretation of the other condition codes is left as an exercise to
the reader.
An edit macro might work just fine as well.
Todd
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Albert Klimek
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 9:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Cobol Conditional Compile
Micro Focus COBOL provides a me
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of (IBM Mainframe Discussion List)
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 10:05 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Is a page protected?--how to determine
>
> In a message dated 7/24/2007 10:5
Getting lots of suggestions/ideas. Gonna take me a bit to sort them out.
My situation is that I need to take current production JCLlib(s) and modify
the ACCT info in each not the same change to all jobcards.
So ... turn the current JCLLIB PDS into a flat file ... run a (yet to be
written) p
In a message dated 7/24/2007 10:56:09 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>very bad idea in general. if the page is not protected, then you
don't know what other processes are updating that page nor how
they serialize their updates. the OI is not an interlocked update
and
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 07:28:52 -0400, Peter Relson wrote:
>Minor chide: It is too bad that folks take their valuable time on ibm-main
>
Cf. the "Heresy" thread.
>to point out deficiencies in the documentation (pointing out is a good
>thing) but then do not submit requests to get them updated. The r
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Paul Schuster
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 12:33 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Is a page protected?--how to determine
>
> Hello: I have a need to determine if an address in stor
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of (IBM Mainframe Discussion List)
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 8:07 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Is a page protected?--how to determine
>
> In a message dated 7/24/2007 1:33:
Esmie,
See SYS1.SAMPLIB(ARCSTRST) look for ALLOSDSP.
Better yet see if you have HSM.SAMPLE.CNTL (There is probably a HLQ in front of
that name).
Once you've defined and primed your SDSP, issue an addvol for that volume with
the SDSP parameter.
However the message you received does NOT me
See SYS1.SAMPLIB(ARCSTRST). Find for "IEBDG"
IEBDG generates a single record that is Loaded into the SDSP in the next
step.
HTH,
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Good Day Gentle Readers,
I am seeking your expert advice. We have a problem with our ML1 migrate
vols. We are unable to migrate to ML1 because of the following reasons:
ARC1001I HOPER.TTOC.LIST1 MIGRATE FAILED, RC=0037, REAS=
ARC1237I NO SPACE FOR MIGRATION COPY
I don't know what manual your looking in? I'm looking in HLASM V1R5
programmers guide. The section on the USING statement doesn't seem to
have a reference to 'Range of an Ordinary USING Instruction'???
For most HLASM information, you can think of the
documentation as a 2-volume set:
SC26-4940 H
Anyone know what platform they run the internet version of IBMLINK on?
Robert Justice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: darn, and I was in a meeting, oh
well, web ibmlink is having problems, (I know,
I know, shock and surprise) ...sev1 issue # is 32585272
You should use the 3270 interface, it's worki
Hi,
I don't know what manual your looking in? I'm looking in HLASM V1R5
programmers guide. The section on the USING statement doesn't seem to
have a reference to 'Range of an Ordinary USING Instruction'???
Phil.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PR
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Finnell
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 10:16 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: PDS to SEQ and back to PDS
>
>
>
> In a message dated 7/24/2007 9:14:11 A.M. Central Daylight
In a message dated 7/24/2007 9:14:11 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The simpliest way that I know of is to use SAS and PROC SOURCE. That can
unload a PDS to a sequential file and put IEBUPDTE control cards (or
other control cards) between members. You then edit the se
Maybe IBM could update the Message to be a bit more obvious as to what
to do when you get the ASMA034E message.
I think that you're being a little harsh on IBM.
When you looked up message ASMA034E, it told you to
"Increase the range of the active USING."
If you had then looked up the USING ins
Andy, Ignoring whether your JCL/DITTO statements are correct .
The IEF343I message is an indication that there are no tape units for
allocation. Looks like you are all system managed libraries and the JL3270 is
not in the TCDB, is either not defined to RMM or is defined in a way that RMM
doe
darn, and I was in a meeting, oh well, web ibmlink is having problems, (I know,
I know, shock and surprise) ...sev1 issue # is 32585272
You should use the 3270 interface, it's working just fine.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signo
I am an ICSF administrator, but I am not involved in that part of the
action. There is both a separation of duties angle as well as it seems
that every application does it differently.
I see ICSF as nothing more than an API and a secure key repository. How
you use those keys is up to the programm
Depending on what you need to change, couldn't you accomplish the
changes using IPOUPDTE/CPPUPDATE?
-Original Message-
I am in need of a fairly straightforward method of turning a PDS into a
flat file (for modifications) and then back into a PDS. Having the
original ISPF stats present in
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:13:55 -0400, Earnie Allen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am in need of a fairly straightforward method of turning a PDS into a
>flat file (for modifications) and then back into a PDS. Having the
>original ISPF stats present in the final PDS is not necessarily a critical
>par
(IBM Mainframe Discussion List) wrote:
Careful reading of the 2105 Command Reference doc shows that valid sector
numbers are not documented as being ignored. I take that to mean they are used
as documented; i.e., the next action on the track will commence with track
orientation at a predict
Earnie Allen of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List
wrote on 07/24/2007 08:13:55 AM:
> I am in need of a fairly straightforward method of turning a PDS into a
> flat file (for modifications) and then back into a PDS. Having the
> original ISPF stats present in the final PDS is not necessarily a
cr
I just heard about this draft redbook and have just browsed thru it and it
looks like a good start for someone with little to no z/VM skills.
The url is
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redpieces/abstracts/sg247316.html?Open
Abstract
This textbook provides students with the background knowledge and
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Earnie Allen
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 8:14 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: PDS to SEQ and back to PDS
>
>
> I am in need of a fairly straightforward method of turning a
> P
Cheers Wayne,
Extremely helpful, thanks a lot :-)
Maybe IBM could update the Message to be a bit more obvious as to what
to do when you get the ASMA034E message.
Phil.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Wayne Driscoll
Sent: 24
Is this the entire JCL? If so, you need a //SYSIN DD statement and
according to my documentation, you also need $$DITTO instead of DITTO as
the command within the //SYSIN.
Of course, my documentation is quite old, but that's what it looks like
to me.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Ma
In a message dated 7/24/2007 1:33:11 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>I have a need to determine if an address in storage is page protected
in order to determine if a PGSER UNPROTECT needs to be done.
One way, not necessarily the most elegant, is to establish an ESTA
Phil,
There are a number of ways.
1 - Add a second base register, for example if R12 is your base
register,
LR R11,R12
AHIR11,4096
USING label,R12,R11
2 - Constantly reload your base register (this is the method used by
many compilers) of course if you do this, then you
Micro Focus COBOL provides a mechanism for selectively compiling part of
the COBOL source. (controlled by $IF, $ELSE, $END)
IBM Enterprise COBOL for z/OS 3.3 do not support conditional compile. I
think about to write a REXX to do this.
Any other ideas ?
Albert
VERLAGSGRUPPE WELTBILD GMBH
Sitz
>> -Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Chase, John
>>
>> Hi, All,
>>
>> IBMLink on the web is unusually slow this morning (even by
>> IBMLink on the Web "standard"!), so I'd like to solicit a bit
>> of help from one of you with a 3270 IBMLink connectio
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
