Lower: 1.3 or 1.4, IRC.
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Bell network.
Original Message
From: Steve Beaver
Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2016 15:19
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: IEAIPS parmlib member
About OS390 1.6 or so
He said z13 & z/OS2.2.
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Bell network.
Original Message
From: michelbutz
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 13:35
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: SUSPEND/RESUME is slower than WAIT/POST. PAUSE/RELEASE is
Memory is abundant in most shops and cheap overall. So, why all fuss about
VIO? Make s decision, implement it, forget it.
-teD
Original Message
From: Norman.Hollander
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 12:19
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: What
You may, if the source changed after the last backup.
-teD
Original Message
From: van der Grijn, Bart (B)
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 11:24
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Mirror/back up your Development DASD
Andy, we mirror our production
OC is part of OPS/MVS. So you need to look in its libraries.
-teD
Original Message
From: Jeremy Nicoll
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 07:30
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: JCL "COMMAND" statements - Follow-up question
On Tue, 17 May 2016, at
into English please? :)
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 8:22 PM, Ted MacNEIL <
010d3e53f7a3-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> He deserves the internship of ot more!
>
> -teD
> Original Message
> From: Mark Post
> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 16:00
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.ED
VTOCIX is the index -- required for SMS, along with the VVDS. The VTOC is
unnamed.
-teD
Original Message
From: michelbutz
Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2016 11:29
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Dataset space information
Hi
I need to obtain dataset
In an ideal world:
1. Subject matter experts set the guidelines (with mgt approval)
2. Auditors have no authourity, they merely report.
3. Compliance officers enforce the rules.
-teD
Original Message
From: Arthur
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 00:31
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM
Dispatching priorities mean nothing if the work is getting done. You're using
the WLM; you should learn and use its terminology.
-teD
Original Message
From: Tracy Adams
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 15:57
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: WLM
That's the way PDS's work. Bigger directory more connect time. Member access is
trivial.
-teD
Original Message
From: Kreiter IBM-Main
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 08:33
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: PDS I/O Performance Improvement
Hello,
Years ago (pre-9) respacks had to be 'split up'. Now, we ask the risk!
-teD
Original Message
From: Lucas Rosalen
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 05:14
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Respack Volume Size Challenge
As far as I have seen, it's
He deserves the internship of ot more!
-teD
Original Message
From: Mark Post
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 16:00
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: z890 in my basement
>>> On 4/19/2016 at 03:11 PM, Mike Schwab wrote:
>
SYS IO is, I believe, the original name shipped for VIO.
A lot of shops added the 'new' since that's what was in the instructional books.
-teD
Original Message
From: Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Friday, May 6, 2016 13:01
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject:
How can you even have a semblance of logic intertwined with faith?
Go drink the kool-aid!
-teD
Original Message
From: Adam M. Dobrin
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2016 07:29
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Fwd: Religion provides statistical proof
Our religious beliefs are our business. This is SPAM!
-teD
Original Message
From: Adam M. Dobrin
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2016 16:31
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Religion provides statistical proof of the Creation of our
civilization. This
Relay #70.
-teD
Original Message
From: John Ehrman
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 00:17
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Grace didn't coin the term "bug"?
The association of bugs with computers may go back to the Mark I (I think
it was) relay
Yes, it was.
-teD
Original Message
From: Clark Morris
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2016 09:09
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Grace didn't coin the term "bug"?
On 18 Mar 2016 05:18:44 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main Ted wrote:
>Relay #70.
Was
Smithson.
It was a moth caught in relay 71
-teD
Original Message
From: CM Poncelet
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 22:08
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Grace didn't coin the term "bug"?
AFAIK The original Grace Hopper 'bug' was an actual bug
I saw some documentation, dated 1981, talking about TSOLIB. It's been around a
long time.
-teD
Original Message
From: Edward Finnell
Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2016 03:25
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Cannot allocate Steplib?
Maybe that's why
I believe there are/were(?) products that allow(ed) dynamic allocation of
steplib, but you never could do it with raw (native) TSO.
-teD
Original Message
From: Tony Harminc
Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2016 01:10
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re:
This is SPAM. Totally unsolicited and unrelated to the list serve's topic.
NOT interested!!
-teD
Original Message
From: Adam Marshall Dobrin
Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2016 02:10
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Fwd: This is it... the (shortened)
IBM has always stated that you CANNOT share a PDSE outside SYSPLEX boundaries
without a risk of corruption. It sounds like you did just that.
That's a big OOPS!
-teD
Original Message
From: R.S.
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 10:29
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe
I believe a path can be up to 1024.
-teD
Original Message
From: Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 20:04
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: How long can a TSO command be?
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 17:38:27 -0500, Steve Thompson wrote:
>On
It wasn't private.
-teD
Original Message
From: Farley, Peter x23353
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 10:36
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: [SURVEY] What ISPF terminal model do you use
David,
I'm replying privately rather than to the list so as
I've worked for, and as a customer of, many sites with chargeback in place.
Your two vectors were RARELY taken into account! Some even tried to do capacity
management with the data.
"Oh look! The unit cost per transaction is going down! We DO NOT need an
upgrade!"
Funny thing, aside from
Your first example is not necessarily bad behavior.
I bet it performed!
-teD
Original Message
From: Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2016 00:59
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Does everybody use chargeback?
Ah, bad or perverse
Why not just create a VBA file with a very long LRECL and not worry about it at
all? Longer LRECLs don't introduce any more oveReader than short ones.
-teD
Original Message
From: Kjell Holmborg
Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 02:54
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe
Best question! When I ran the tests we never considered anything smaller than
the full size of our CBU agreement.
-teD
Original Message
From: Ambros, Thomas
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 15:38
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: CBU test
I
I Googled IBM APAR closing codes and found a doc in the IBM Knowledge Centre.
You could have done this, too.
-teD
Original Message
From: Peter
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 09:31
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Debugging APAR statement
Hi
me to a manual?
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 12:58 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: WLM managed initiators
Per system? Per PLEX?
Also, what happens
Per system? Per PLEX?
Also, what happens if there aren't enough resources to support that minimum?
Have a look at Resource Classes. It may answer your needs -- it's based on
resources rather than jobs.
-teD
Original Message
From: גדי בן אבי
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 04:37
To:
Not confused. Just didn't remember the hardware correctly.
But, I do remember the complaints for 4K out of an entire HIPERSPACE.
-teD
Original Message
From: Jim Mulder
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 02:15
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re:
With ESA it was 'absolute' zero.
I remember because we had users complain about the unusable portion of a
HIPERSPACE which was the PSA.
-teD
Original Message
From: Robert Hahne
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 01:36
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject:
What he said!
-teD
Original Message
From: Savor, Thomas (Alpharetta)
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 19:39
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Outsourcing Stories Good or Bad!
Vignesh,
Until you have had your job (your way of life) ripped away
Those Christmas/Birthday cards that 'sing' when you open them contain,
individually, more computing power than was on the face of the planet in 1950.
-teD
Original Message
From: zMan
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 21:00
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
In general, e-mail servers are case insensitive.
-teD
Original Message
From: Ed Finnell
Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2016 02:47
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Lower ibm-main
Hopefully it doesn't matter and either case will be routed to the
I said "in general"
-teD
Original Message
From: Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2016 13:33
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Lower ibm-main
On 2016-02-03, at 05:43, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
> In general, e-mail ser
I don't really understand 'the security reason'.
I can't think of anything that RMF shows you that would be a security exposure.
-teD
Original Message
From: Adnan Can
Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 07:14
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: RMF
I think the IKJ message is from send/receive.
-teD
Original Message
From: Tony Harminc
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 00:42
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: IEFSSREQ SSOBUSER Validate A JES2 Destid
On 29 January 2016 at 00:02, Skip
404 not found
-teD
Original Message
From: Ed Finnell
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2016 16:25
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: z13 BC
They've been doing announcements around SHARE so might be a good place to
find out more faster.
WSC's Harv
I always thought it was a relay.
-teD
Original Message
From: Ed Finnell
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 01:17
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: the Queen of Coding - Adm. Grace Hoper
Chicken fried moth between the vacuum tubes.
In a message
That that is is that that is not is not is that it it is
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Ed Finnell
Sent: Friday, January 8, 2016 03:33
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: SMFxTME field
That that is is that that is not is not?
In a message
We 'had' to do this, once.
IBM originally recommended that LPAR names be independent of the 'name' of the
image name running within it.
Then, with GDPS, they recommended the reverse. The implementation went without
a hitch.
All our reporting/billing? Not so well.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
If you understand how UNIX works, this is quite sensible. See how the ISPF
interface to USS works.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Alan Young
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2015 12:13
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: BPXBATCH "SH ...; su; pax
Obviously misinformed!
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Mike Schwab
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 05:21
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: slight reprieve on the z.
They are running the LAST IMS MAINFRAME in North America in 2003?
Why does IBM
It was converted from PASCAL for OS/390 1.7 (1990's). So, any doc would be of
that vintage
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 06:21
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: TAR Files:" Extracting" on a
If you're interfacing with ISPF programmes then ISPEXEC SELECT works, as well.
I've done it for years. Of course, you have to have a valid ISPF environment
set up.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Ravi Gaur
Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2015 05:12
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM
Did you try using ISPF Services to load it?
I believe:
address ISPEXEC "SELECT PGM()"
Or it might be CMD
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Lizette Koehler
Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2015 22:14
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: HCD
'.
Check John's original 24x7x365.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: 07 December, 2015 9:09
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM z Systems Development Blog
24x7x52 is already a year (less a few days
In Texas Hold'em is what I was talking about.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Randy Hudson
Sent: Sunday, December 6, 2015 23:03
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: IBM z Systems Development Blog
In article
24x7x52 is already a year (less a few days).
Multiplying by 365 makes it 365 yrars.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM
Sent: Monday, December 7, 2015 02:35
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: IBM z Systems Development Blog
It is true, we only use the holes in the punchcards.'
Kees.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: 04 December, 2015 6:33
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: OT: What's a "ton" of JCL?
Is that
Easier to get a Royal Flush.
265,000:1
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Vince Coen
Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 16:17
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: IBM z Systems Development Blog
The BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation - UK) does *NOT*
Is that counting the weight of the boxes themselves?
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Thomas Kern
Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 00:14
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: OT: What's a "ton" of JCL?
Approximately 274905 cards.
2000 cards per box
Put monitors in SYSSTC.
This gives them the second highest DP in the system. You cannot completely
control the DP in Service Classes.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: phil yogendran
Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 11:02
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Our cards are still embossed here in Canada.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Smith III, Phil (HP Data Security (Voltage))
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 17:52
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: CC usage in Germany (Europe) [WAS: Were you at
My understanding is that ABO is not required for modern COBOL compilers. Only
for the 'old' binarys.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Lizette Koehler
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 09:47
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Interesting Article
Or, more recent versions of IDCAMS.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: J O Skip Robinson
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 19:07
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: (External):Re: Deleting all members of a pds
Can also be accomplished with PDS[85]
ERBRMFPP
Comes free.
See the RMF USER'S GUIDE
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Lizette Koehler
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 08:50
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: SMF/RMF Reporting question
Do you have any tools like
Versioning
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Peter Hunkeler
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 16:42
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: AW: Re: Fastest way to read OLDEST GDG entry
> What makes "V00" ever Vnn, where N<>0?
IIRC, the system does not
You can do it (carefully) with OMEGAMON, but it's error-prone and tricky (as
previously stated). It's documented in a separate manual that the vendor
advises be kept under lock and key, which I agree with.
We let people free up CCA on the development box, since the alternative was an
IPL.
What's so special about Sunday? I used to work for an international bank.
Sunday. Was no excuse for an outage!
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Vince Coen
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2015 07:11
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: RE-IPL for the
I've been wondering how long it would take for time-change questions to start.
It's a little later this year.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Charles Mills
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 17:29
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: RE-IPL for the
So, why michelbutz?
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: michelbutz
Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2015 19:44
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: IEAVAPE2/IEAVPSE2 another address space
Thank you
My real name is Joseph Reichman
And I have licensed
Is it?
We had people supporting that from home because the company was trying to get
more to work that way because it was cheaper than the cost of having them in
the office.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Clark Morris
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 11:59
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply
There is an option in the WLM to make a service class memory critical.
It was designed especially for this issue with CICS.
If CICS is not requesting the page out, this will protect all the regions in
the service class.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Peter Hunkeler
Sent: Friday, October 9,
Don't use the angle brackets.
It's just notation
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Ed Finnell
Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2015 18:20
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Subscribing to IBM-MAIN
Darren will probably respond when he gets off his day
What problems are you attempting to solve by enforcing this?
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Farley, Peter x23353
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 12:25
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: How to limit tiny SMS-managed VSAM KSDS to one volume?
I
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 12:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How to limit tiny SMS-managed VSAM KSDS to one volume?
What problems are you attempting to solve by enforcing this?
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From
Model 204:
The Bank of Nova Scotia (under VM)
Becker's
The Canadian Depository and Clearing Corporation
To name but 3.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Anthony Thompson
Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2015 02:48
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re:
We did for Y2K.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Markus Haselbach
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 04:55
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Testing with dates in the future
Hallo,
in our installation we do application testing with special dates
There is NO SUCH THINGS as a culprit!
They are just doing their job and so are you. They just happened to collide.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Richard Pinion
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 14:31
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Dataset
What would the auditors gain with this knowledge?
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Jousma, David
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 08:30
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: RSU or maintenance level on a system
IBM is correct. No way to do that.
There are a couple of shops in Toronto that use it.
It was developed by a couple of. CROWN TECH/DATACROWN ex-employees.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Shane Ginnane
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2015 14:52
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re:
It was -- divisible by 400.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Jon Butler
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 11:16
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: LOADING An AMODE64 Program
Did she realize 2000 was not a leap year?
1. IiRC, V=R is no longer supported. I could be wrong -- it happens sometimes.
2. The reason for the 'high' frame count is because the job needs them.
Limiting them, yourself if it were possible, would strangle the job. z/OS
(srm/wlm) knows best as to who needs what and, in general, it's
Okay. I knew I might have been wrong.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: John Eells
Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 13:01
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Limit number of frames of real storage per job
eamacn...@yahoo.ca (Ted MacNEIL) wrote:
1
Which is worse?
The alleged SPOF?
Or, what happens when GRSRNLxx doesn't match?
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 10:51
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: XCF HELP!
Better? I don't like
SPOF - Single Point of Failure
I don't need to see the post: that was my point!
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 11:22
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: XCF HELP!
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
Which
of a Cobol book -
Cobol unleashed!
.
Vince
Cobol since 1963, IT since 1961 (from 1403, 7094, 360/30 et al).
On 29/07/15 17:20, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:11:56 -0400, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
Why is it so ludicrous? The USDOD did develop COBOL for some reasom.
And a generation
Why is it so ludicrous? The USDOD did develop COBOL for some reasom.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: zMan
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 11:28
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Article on COBOL's inevitable return
Fairly decent except for
for code written for DoD projects, but DoD is not [yet] omnipotent.
JC Ewing
On 07/29/2015 12:04 PM, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
Hence NOT ludicrous!
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Vince Coen
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 12:54
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion
I'm constantly amazed at the number of times this type of question still comes
up considering how long the technology has been around!
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Buckton, T. (Theo)
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 10:32
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Look into the fact that you can't share PDSE's across SYSPLEX's.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Jake Anderson
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 17:31
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Corrupt PDSE
Hello,
I get below message when i try to access a
A point of curiosity. Why are your users not allowed to create PDSE datasets?
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: willie bunter
Sent: Friday, July 3, 2015 09:34
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: SMS ACS ROUTINE VARIABLES
I saw the USER variable in
Statistics can always show what you think you want.
But, showing 24-hour averages doesn't prove a lack of performance impact.
You're doing your customers a disservice if you don't demonstrate the impact
during peak times. 10-15 minute duration.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Toni Cecil
Less money usually means less skill, too.
So it seems from my experience up here in Canada.
(less care, too)
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Leonard Sasso
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2015 13:36
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Forbes: IT
The IBM supplied utility IFASMFDP.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Rich Szabo
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2015 00:32
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: SMFDUMP CBT S0C4 under z/OS 2.1
SMFDUMP V10 from the CBT tape is giving us a S0C4 under z/OS 2.1.
So, how is it done?
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Scott Fagen
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 17:59
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: How is CAMASTER started?
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 11:12:27 +0200, nitz-...@gmx.net nitz-...@gmx.net wrote:
Does
Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: OT STCK question
Aw geez, where's Gilmore when we need him?
On 6/17/2015 3:48 PM, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
It's generally for generic usage.
It's okay when used colloquially, ie:
Pat enjoys a drink when he's alone.
OR:
Pat enjoys a drink when she's alone
It's generally for generic usage.
It's okay when used colloquially, ie:
Pat enjoys a drink when he's alone.
OR:
Pat enjoys a drink when she's alone.
Exaggerated examples are akin to straw-person arguments.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 16:31
'waste' depends on frequency of use, ease of maintenance, skill set(s), AND
impact to th 4HRA.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: David Crayford
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 10:46
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Is there any tools or interface
Canada and the US: two countries separated by a common language.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: J O Skip Robinson
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 14:21
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: OT STCK question
My head is about to explode. In US English
Now I remember!
In 1981, I had to go in when I was on nights (mornings) and switch all the
printers over.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Norman.Hollander
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 12:17
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: GRS Control Unit (
A common choice, at least in Canada, is to use the plural pro-noun, since, in
English, it in gender neutral.
It's difficult to get used to, at first.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 10:46
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe
It was the TV show.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Tony's Outlook via Mozilla
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 22:11
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: IND$FILE Resource Log Monitoring
Not wishing to be a Black Hat and not wanting to think like a
I don't know about politically correct.
But, it is recommended in the Canadian Press Book of Style.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 18:11
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: OT STCK question
On Thu, 11
Sorry. Spellchecker -- OH should read OC.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 11:11
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: List of all on-line volumes com106.226.661
OH is part of OPS/REXX which is part of OPS/MVS
OH is part of OPS/REXX which is part of OPS/MVS, iirc.
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: Jousma, David
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 10:01
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: List of all on-line volumes com106.226.661
I suspect OC is a site REXX exec
Real programmers don't document code
It was hard to write; it should be hard to read!
-
-teD
-
Original Message
From: CM Poncelet
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 20:35
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Did I really need a CLIST???
I spake in jest
1 - 100 of 336 matches
Mail list logo