Adam Thornton wrote:
I haven't ever approached Theo about a 390 port.
But with Hercules,
you could get started for very very cheap
Of course, Theo would probably sooner jump off a
cliff than allow OCO
stuff to intrude into his OS.
Is it possible to put OBSD efficiently on VM
Hi Gary,
yes we are currently on the way to open an incident at the reseller. I will
email you off-list the reseller's and the customer's name.
Thank you all for your help and many ideas so far.
Franz Josef
- Original Message -
From: Gary Eheman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
On 19 Dec 2006 at 7:48, Les Geer (607-429-3580) wrote:
I started an LPR link in RSCS with this command:
SMSG RSCS DEFINE PDF01PO ASTART TYPE LPR FORM *
PARM EXIT=LPRXONE HOST=10.240.1.128 PRINTER=PDF01PO
ITO=0 USER=Y SYS=Y EPARM='S=N FF=N C=LPRCFG'
For some reason,
PING does not run on the TCP/IP stack, it runs on the userid that issued
the command.
I would like to thank everyone who helped me understand the
way PING and DNS work in CMS. :-)
It's working fine!
The only other thing I needed to fix was
an incorrect DOMAINORIGIN statement, our network
This looks like an MVS question, but it's really not -
I do all the IOCP preparation from VM, for both the
VM and the MVS boxes, and have to
explain to the MVS people why it's not necessary to
do it in MVS for that box.
In my IOCP I have CVC channels (ESCON Converter
to parallel [bus/tag]
bind is, these days, anything but minimal.
We should port OpenBSD to the 390. You could probably run OpenBSD +
bind
in a 12MB VM.
You can run Linux in a 12Mb VM just fine -- we do 16 and 32M Debian
guests all the time. You just can't run *SuSE or RH as distributed* in
that little memory.
From mvs (master console) you'd cf(config) the chipid online(on),then
vary the path and the devices online. What I don't know is what you'd do
to have it offline to VM so those devices wouldn't rec an interrupt from
VM.
Mace
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
On 12/20/06, Shimon Lebowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only other thing I needed to fix was
an incorrect DOMAINORIGIN statement, our network
uses something weird. But having the wrong
value *does* prevent me from pinging things.
The DNS lookup is only for fully qualified names like
Of course, Theo would probably sooner jump off a cliff than allow OCO
stuff to intrude into his OS.
Is it possible to put OBSD efficiently on VM without OCO blobs?
The only remaining OCO Linux on Z driver is the 3590 tape driver code,
AFAIK.
The DNS protocol has been stretched and
the de-facto standard extended beyond the RFCs.
And bind happens to *be* the de-facto standard implementation. Another
reason to run it instead of the VM DNS server code.
And Microsoft Windows happens to *be* the de-facto standard implementation
(of a
Larry,
The devices should be added to the Offline_at_IPL statement in the
SYSTEM CONFIG file for the VM system, located on MAINT's CF1 disk.
At 09:42 AM 12/20/2006, you wrote:
From mvs (master console) you'd cf(config) the chipid online(on),then
vary the path and the devices online.
On 12/20/06, Jack Woehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bind is, these days, anything but minimal.
We should port OpenBSD to the 390. You could probably run OpenBSD + bind
in a 12MB VM.
So on what measurements would you base such a claim? And what does it
compare to with Linux on zSeries? I
Thanks Duane, but I didn't explain my part of the question properly (not
the first time huh). What I meant was if the chipd is online to VM and
and is needed by MVS we can move thse on the fly with the config on/off
command. But what would you do to bring that chpid offline to a running
VM system
Has anyone taken the time to come up with the minimal system requirements
for a SLES installation?
Even the minimal system selection on the software install panel seems a
little over engineered.
--
Mark Pace
Mainline Information Systems
I bet that there is a vendor (not IBM) that would be glad to sell you a minimal DNS server in a
small Linux. It would probably come in DDR format ready to load on a minidisk and run.
Is a salesman at Sine Nomine listening? :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 19, 2006, at 9:25 PM, Jack Woehr
VARY ON/OFF CHPID nn
Regards,
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Macioce, Larry
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 7:17 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: IOCP dynamic reconfiguration
Is there a similar command
In my low memory tests of SUSE, it would run fine in 12 MBs and no
swapping, that is, until you want to do something (like YaST). joe
works. kate works.
The biggest difference I've seen in the low memory linux images, is
method of communication.
IUCV and VCTCA, works well in 12 MB.
OSA and
SLES9 64 bit with OSA (OSA and Hipersockets have large buffer
requirements) say they need 512MB. I've done installs in 256 MBs. I do
get a message stating insufficient storage, but the install with only
the normal base packages, works fine.
During the installation, you don't have access to
I bet that there is a vendor (not IBM) that would be glad to sell you
a
minimal DNS server in a
small Linux. It would probably come in DDR format ready to load on a
minidisk and run.
Is a salesman at Sine Nomine listening? :)
When do you want it? 8-)
-- db
Tom Duerbusch wrote:
IUCV and VCTCA, works well in 12 MB.
OSA and Hipersockets, 48 MB.
Now back on tangent to the origional discussion...
Speaking of tangents
There's OCO in Linux/390 ... is it *necessary* to run a guest OS or
is it possible to run (and run efficiently?) a guest OS
As a lark, I tried bring up VSE/ESA 2.7.2 up under a second level z/VM
5.2 (z/VM Version 5 Release 2.0, service level 0602 (64-bit) ) system
that is running under z/VM 5.1 (z/VM Version 5 Release 1.0, service
level 0501 (64-bit)).
No go.
Right after ipl restart point has been bypassed, I get:
Code FED will be in the messages manual and will explain what it's
bitching about.
On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 11:21 -0800, Daniel Allen wrote:
We moved from a z800 to z9BC. z/VM 4.3 came up okay. OS/390 2.10 works
fine.
However, when we bring up z/VSE 2.6, we get the following:
SYSTEM ENTERED
Brian Inglis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
IME the IBM VM guys had very good ideas for interaction using the
corporate products and facilities, even though it has never been
funded adequately and often nearly terminated.
They were much better than the batch guys at letting the users fully
use all
On Dec 20, 2006, at 12:37 PM, Jack Woehr wrote:
Tom Duerbusch wrote:
IUCV and VCTCA, works well in 12 MB.
OSA and Hipersockets, 48 MB.
Now back on tangent to the origional discussion...
Speaking of tangents
There's OCO in Linux/390 ... is it *necessary* to run a guest OS or
is it
On 12/20/06, Adam Thornton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know how much OCO there really is anymore, actually. The
QDIO drivers are available now, and I think there's even a 3590
implementation. You could certainly get a Linux system, with
networking, built without anything that isn't Free
Found it.
I took the 3rd level VSE machine, TSTESA5F and brought it back up
second level. Right after the ipl restart has been bypassed is the
normal stuff about the lock file.
LOCK FILE? Ar
This is a standalone system from the normal systems. i.e. it is a
flash copy of our TSTESA5
There are a ton of PTFs needed to get VSE 2.6 to run on a z9.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Daniel Allen
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 1:21 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: VSE hard wait under z/VM 4.3
We moved
various We should port BSD quotes
Someone did a bunch of patches to one of the BSD's some years ago.
I know, I saw it. I'm pretty sure I bookmarked it but as per usual, when
I want to find the thing I can't... ah, there it is. Hmmm... it was the
FreeBSD stuff. Maybe someone (else) can have a
On Wednesday, 12/20/2006 at 09:07 CET, Rob van der Heij
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/20/06, Adam Thornton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know how much OCO there really is anymore, actually. The
QDIO drivers are available now, and I think there's even a 3590
implementation. You
Alan Altmark wrote:
An OCO module may use the above in any combination, so I'm not sure what
Jack is asking about: OCO modules (none remain - the 3590 tape driver was
open sourced back in May) or interfaces in category 2.
I was really asking two questions (which now seem to be answered):
There's OCO in Linux/390 ... is it *necessary* to run a guest OS or
is it possible to run (and run efficiently?) a guest OS like, um, say,
just hypothetically, OpenBSD/390 without any OCO?
If you don't have or don't want to use 3590 tapes, yes.
Hello,
I've been comparing the Velocity ESAMON and IBM Performance Toolkit
products on z/VM 5.2, and have noticed that they disagree on the value of
the SYTSHS_RSASHARE monitor record. According to the IBM doc, the
SYTSHS_RSASHARE monitor record represents Cardinal count of resident shared
Thanks, I was hoping that I wasn't dreaming it.
Chuckie: please don't start any threads regarding dreams about Uli!
Richard Heritage wrote:
According to a presentation given by Ulrich Weigand at the last SHARE,
the 3590 support went open source in March of this year, so there are no
longer any
Can you change DOSRES SYSWK1 labels using ICKDSF under z/VM ?
**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Any
Sure you can, but you may not like the results. Why do you want to
change them?
Daniel Allen wrote:
Can you change DOSRES SYSWK1 labels using ICKDSF under z/VM ?
--
Rich Smrcina
VM Assist, Inc.
Phone: 414-491-6001
Ans Service: 360-715-2467
rich.smrcina at vmassist.com
Catch the WAVV!
I have always used DITTO in CMS to do this.
ICKDSF CPVOL has a clip function - I'm not sure if you can do it
outside of CPVOL. Maybe you could use CPVOL's LABEL function even
though it's not a VM volume, but I've never tried it.
If you have DITTO in CMS, use it. It works nicely.
-
Although we have IPLed our VM/ESA 2.4 on our 9672 using the HMC, I also
need to know how to run a DDR restore.
With a DDR tape that I had built with DDR at the front, followed by a
full-pack dump after it, I could not get it to work under VM. With a
tape at 181 and the disk pack attached at 521,
37 matches
Mail list logo
