-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of Brian Nielsen
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 3:21 PM
To:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: DDR to standard labeled tapes
That was my point, 2nd level you have to use CMS to do the tape
: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Brian Nielsen
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 7:11 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject:Re: DDR to standard labeled tapes
I know you can do that as a crude FSF file, but you can't BSF without
CMS. A CP command
On Friday, 06/09/2006 at 08:48 MST, Schuh, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I never saw the problem on a 3088 - we had a 9088 that apparently did
the right
thing when it received the IPL reset signal :) In any event, this
applies to
anything that causes an interrupt when the stand-alone
Watch that dark ages stuff, Chuckie. By the time I saw that problem, I was
no longer keying on an 029 or maybe 026. I had graduated to a 3278 or
3279, altho I did then and still do carry 5081 cards in my pocket.
Jim
At 01:31 PM 6/9/2006, you wrote:
In the Dark Ages (stone knives and bear
Never ran into that with a 3088, but I certainly did back with a 3705.
We ended up having that Ctrlr on a channel switch which we had to
disable when booting. Early during an HPO release (4.somethng IIRC), we
even saw it interfere with a CP IPL until we worked with a Standalone
Dump and Level
to standard labeled tapes
Watch that dark ages stuff, Chuckie. By the time I saw that problem, I
was
no longer keying on an 029 or maybe 026. I had graduated to a 3278 or
3279, altho I did then and still do carry 5081 cards in my pocket.
Jim
At 01:31 PM 6/9/2006, you wrote:
In the Dark Ages (stone
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject:Re: DDR to standard labeled tapes
John,
carry 5081 cards in my pocket
Wow! 5,081 cards in your pocket!?
Must be really small cards or really big pockets!
Talk about playing with a full deck! :-)
Ah, it's Friday, isn't it?
Mike Walter
Jim Bohnsack
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: DDR to standard labeled tapes
You must be a kid if you don't know what 5081 cards
are or am I the only
one on the list who does?
Jim
At 03:11 PM 6/9/2006, you wrote:
John,
carry 5081 cards in my pocket
Wow
On: Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 03:54:45PM -0400,Jim Bohnsack Wrote:
} You must be a kid if you don't know what 5081 cards are or am I the only
} one on the list who does?
I remember them. I tossed a full box of them in my last cross country
move in 1997.
--
Rich Greenberg N Ft Myers, FL, USA
I call this Psuedo-standard labels because of the lack of HDR1, EOF1, EOV
labels. This has worked well enough for at least 12 years of successful
Disaster Recovery exercises. The only problem I have hit is remembering t
o
IPL the tape drive twice to get to my standalone DDR program that leads m
y
I tell the DR vendor assistant to IPL device that I have my initial
sysres backup tape loaded on. I run ONE standalone DDR to restore MY sysr
es
and then IPL my sysres to restore the rest of the system. Our MVS people
use
the vendor's floor system to load a PDS of job control information and
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc:
Subject:Re: DDR to standard labeled tapes
I call this Psuedo-standard labels because of the lack of HDR1, EOF1, EOV
labels. This has worked well enough for at least 12 years of successful
Disaster Recovery exercises. The only
And of course if you're running 2nd level you can use CMS to forward spac
e
the tape to the appropriate location before you IPL it. It's faster and
you won't see any IPL failure messages.
Too bad CP only provides command to REWIND the tape to the load point and
none to forward/backward
you need, right?
Steve G.
Jim Bohnsack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
06/08/2006 12:12 PM
Please respond to The IBM z/VM Operating System
To:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc:
Subject:Re: DDR to standard labeled tapes
How about TAPE FSF ( VDEV is 181 as a default)
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brian Nielsen
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 4:27 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: DDR to standard labeled tapes
And of course
How about TAPE FSF ( VDEV is 181 as a default)
TAPE is a CMS command, not a CP command.
But from second level cms:
Tape FSF N
CP term con 3270
Cp IPL CL LOADPARM CUU
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Boyes
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 5:34 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: DDR to standard
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: DDR to standard labeled tapes
How about TAPE FSF ( VDEV is 181 as a default)
TAPE is a CMS command, not a CP command.
:Re: DDR to standard labeled tapes
That was my point, 2nd level you have to use CMS to do the tape
poisitoning, there is not a CP command. If you're logged onto a userid =
that doesn't normally have access to CMS (ex. a z/OS guest) there is extr=
a
work to do to get CMS running
Ipling a HDR1 gives you an IPL Unit Error. That's most of what I
see. There is one other ipl error message that you see once in a while,
but any error comes back right away. If you really do hit something you
want, there is no error message and then you start giving the program some
attn
I would like to DDR DUMP to standard label (3480-XF) tapes.
For reasons I won't go into here, I plan to manually define the
extents to be dumped to each tape, so DDR's multi-volume tape handling
is not an issue.
So is there any more to it than writing a VOL1 hdr, starting at the load
point,
21 matches
Mail list logo
