List folks-
I have mail list issue that I can't solve. We have a user that has a
true opt in email list. Many of his 10,000 AOL list members are not
receiving list mail. AOL has been contacted (ISP relations - postmaster)
and they said that they are NOT blocking the mail from our SMTP server.
Lo
Well Venky to be quite honest I'd have to say I don't know. 6000+ email's
to your members is quite a lot for just 1gb of ram. Not knowing your
hardware config, etc, I'd be guessing to say you're lucky it only took 30
minutes.. not counting the mail that's trying to send.. hopefully the fine
'guru
Slowness is started suddenly when the mail sent to the list.
we are having 1Gb RAM.
I did not check the task manager that time, but I can say the slowness
occurred due to mail send to list. Because after the mail delivery to list
users completed, system came to normal position.
Is 6000+ users per
Did the slowness suddenly start or has it been an on going issue? Check the
task manager to see what processes might be drawing higher than normal cpu
usage? Defrag the drives lately? Got RAM?
~Rick
- Original Message -
From: "venky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: We
FWIW, there is a tool called DRTCP that you can find here:
http://www.dslreports.com/faq/578 and if you are using PPOE I'd recommend
installing raspppoe from: http://user.cs.tu-berlin.de/~normanb/
I've used raspppoe a few times with outstanding success for DSL SBC/Bell
South. Seems there DSLAM'S
Hi all,
We are using Imail 7.12.
We are having a list with 6000+ users.
When mail send to that list, server is becoming dead slow, almost hanged.
It is taking 30 to 40 minutes to deliver the mail to all list members.
Is the above list is normal or abnormal?
Is there any limit to number of users
also:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;324704
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sbs/maintain/featusability/gets
tart.asp
- Tony
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Coveney
>Sent: Wednesday, December 1
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;302548
Instead of attempting to spool mail and transfer to a dialup exchange server
using ETRN, etc., we have always had much better luck using the POP3
connector. Basically it works like so:
- add the domain to Imail, create a single user m
I have had lots of various connectivity problems using DSL connections,
often with Microsoft PPTP. I learned that the DSL routers often do not
support the lowering of the MTU (Maximum Transfer Unit) upon request. In
many cases a hardware firewall can be used to lower it. You may also be able
to lo
Anyone have any idea on how to get this to
work?
Regards,
Tom
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
just might go this route as a last measure (telco cost is approx $175/week
to nail
up an analog call 24x7) :(
no, the exchange machine or their router dialin/connects for 20 minutes and
just sits there (or sends mail to internet), during which time Imail, set
to retry every 15 minutes, finds
Sanford Whiteman wrote:
Why not in IMail? heck Ipswitch is doing it somehow?
Ipswitch is using mail-archive.com, which uses MHonArc.
-Sandy
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitc
> and you have that ip in Imail "relay for addresses" ?
Yep! It's part of my block already in the relay for.
> can you see the exchange box contacting Imail and issuing ETRN ?
MS dialer doesn't kick in on a schedule (appears lamed from 5.5 -> 2000),
Thanks MS!
Yes, I can telnet from the dial co
Thanks, I missed that one in my search.
-Kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joseph Mann
> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 7:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] OT: Exchange2000 & ETRN with Imail spooling.
> However, the big catch here is that in most cases doing this is
> silly and pointless, except for the warm fuzzies that come with it.
> Typically "The Boss" loves hearing that he has a secure connection
> to the mailserver, because he has no clue (and doesn't care) that
> the E-mail
Try clearing your cache for the ms ts rdp client then the jumping should go
away.
~Rick
- Original Message -
From: "Douglas L. Brantley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 4:53 PM - SATCOM
Subject: [IMail Forum] Imail 7.13 HF 2
>
> I downloade
We send out a lot of faxes to various companies around the US and have never
had 1 not go through.. or get hung. Granted we only have a 'small client
base' but the faxes are sent to different types of fax machiens with no ill
effects. 'coupled to a external 56k us robotics modem'
~Rick
- Ori
> Anyway solutions that don't involve a gateway? That just work
> naturally with IMail?
If there were, you wouldn't find people suggesting the gateway. :)
IMail only supports TLS with HTTP.
-Sandy
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://ww
2. We have given the customer a dial-up account with a Static IP assignment
matching
the IP in DNS and the IMail Hosts file. This has been verified by looking
at the
dialup logs and Telneting to the IMail server.
and you have that ip in Imail "relay for addresses" ?
can you see the excha
How can a client securely retrieve their email using IMAP or POP3? That is,
if they have sensitive messages in their mailbox, they want the retrieval of
those messages to be encrypted.
You can use secure POP3, by using an SSL tunnelling program ( such as
http://www.stunnel.org ) on the IMail
I downloaded and applied HF 2.
It fixed the Administrator screen issue.
I use the Terminal Services Client (RDP)
and the image seems to jump from the
lower right screen up to the correct location.
db
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/su
Take a look at this.
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-20021001-DM01.htm
--
Best regards,
Josephmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wednesday, December 18, 2002, 6:29:56 PM, you wrote:
KC> Hello:
KC> We have a customer moving their offices and their new leased line will no
> Why not in IMail? heck Ipswitch is doing it somehow?
Ipswitch is using mail-archive.com, which uses MHonArc.
-Sandy
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: ht
This would seem like a common question, but after looking through the list
archives (back to 1999!), I was unable to find a resolution. I did find the
same question raised a couple of times, but no definitive answer.
How can a client securely retrieve their email using IMAP or POP3? That is,
if
Anyway, I set up logging, and a "copy box" for this client (I put a copy
of every email going to that domain into a single mailbox). Sure enough,
he got another one. So, I looked in my "copy box" and it was in there -
.scr file and all. I also check the headers and tracked it in my log
files.
At the moment, I am running 7.03. I want to install the hotfix 3, and have
downloaded the file "imail707.exe". Is this the correct file for the
upgrade, and is there anything else I have to worry about? I understand
there was an update to the templates since 7.03, so do I have to download
that a
Hello:
We have a customer moving their offices and their new leased line will not
be installed for another couple of weeks. We have configured our IMail
server
to spool their emails but are experiencing some problems getting the
Exchange
server to retrieve them via ETRN.
Some details:
1. Our IMai
> I then saved the infected file on my desktop, attached it to an
> email to that user - and it was rejected by the rule! Finally, I
> forwarded the original infected message to that user - and it was
> rejected by the rule! So, basically, everything seems to work, but
> it really doe
Title: Message
I have a question
for the throbbing Imail brain -
I have a rules.ima
file in each of the domain directories on my Imail server. I use this file to
block certain things coming into my server like attachments with .pif, .scr, and
.bat attachments. I'm certain these rules work
Stability it seems to have; features on the other hand...
Plain text faxes are pretty much the limit. With that, it does indeed
work well, though. I use it for group faxing of WAN outage notes and
automated alerts primarily and it does a great job of it. I wouldn't
use it for much more than
> For example, a messages comes into the imail box from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> and is addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED], however, the message is getting
> delivered by imail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Make sure the top directories for the domains are not overlapping, and
consult your logs.
-Sandy
To U
> Does anyone have any recommendations on a solution to allow many
> users connecting in various ways to be able to use Outlook?
Is there a specific reason that directing them to use their ISP's SMTP
servers is objectionable? Provided that they allow the MAIL FROM: to
be at another domain,
Thank you Sandy for your response;
Sanford Whiteman wrote:
Could someone please let me know, how to do this, or send me a link
that would explain how it is done..
Google for mHonArc.
I will do some checking on this...
In Imail???
No.
Why not in IMail?
heck Ipswi
To put a bandage over the problem (but not really cure what ails you), you could get the KillerWebMail templates (http://www.ipswitch.com/products/IMail_Server/enhancements.html) to make the web interface more friendly.
Luckily, I don't have any users who have reported that issue to me (they mostl
Dan,
Currently the problem does not occur on NT4 so you could probably get away
with not installing it right now. However, as I told Bryan, I would add
this to my next scheduled maintenance just in case some other Microsoft
update causes this to happen on NT. It will not hurt you to install it,
But what exactly is the problem with IMail's mail-to-fax option? Is it just
that it lacks features
compared to a real fax server, yet
It can probably handle the basics of receiving mail from an alias and then
turning that into a fax ready to be shipped out analog, right?
read about the fea
But what exactly is the problem with IMail's mail-to-fax option? Is it just
that it lacks features or is it unstable?
It can probably handle the basics of receiving mail from an alias and then
turning that into a fax ready to be shipped out analog, right?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Is Hotfix 2 applicable if iMail is running on NT4 SP6 server?
John Korsak wrote:
> IMail Forum:
>
> Ipswitch has identified a window placement issue with the IMail
> Administrator for users who are running Windows 2000 or Windows XP and have
> applied Microsoft security update Q328310. To addres
Just though of something.
Will decludevirus need to scane these Fax/emails??
You can set up Declude Virus not to scan the attachment type (.jpg, .tif,
or whatever it may be). :)
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution fo
I have been looking at the incoming features and it looks straight
forward. Can you tell me what I might look to go wrong???
how do you take an fax image file over whose content you no controal and
decide programmatically who's supposed to get it?
There are solutions like DID but they only w
If you are not experiencing the problem it is safe to not apply the hotfix.
However, it is possible that some other Microsoft update could make the same
change to the OS. So I would add this to the next scheduled downtime/update
for the server even if you don't have the problem right now
Yes, it
Hello,
Just though of something.
Will decludevirus need to scane these Fax/emails??
Could JunkMail stop junk faxs???
Reasons I am tryig to see how these Fax programs pass the fax to the
SMTP server. Should they be on the IMail box a different one???
Maybe I will come in on Dec 26 and some littl
Does anyone have any recommendations on a solution to allow many users
connecting in various ways to be able to use Outlook?
In other words, "Is there any way to let our customers whose ISPs don't
allow them to connect to us connect to us?".
The two most common ways around this are to use SMT
Now that MSN has declared that they will not support
connecting to third party smtp servers we are looking for alternative
solutions.
We would be considered a third party mail provider.
People connect to the Internet however that can and use our mail service.
AOL & MSN are two majo
On Wednesday, December 18, 2002, 2:56:41 PM, Trent M. Davenport wrote:
WIT> I installed HF2 and then recopied IAdmin.exe, IMailsec.dll and Mailbox.dll
WIT> to my local machine but now I cannot connect to the mail server.
WIT> It give me "Failed to load host data."
WIT> Anyone else experiencing th
Hello,
Wednesday, December 18, 2002, 2:23:23 PM, you wrote:
>>Very serious about this. Senior VP was setting in call center
>>yesterday and was not happy with the bottle neck at fax machines. I
>>have set up 4 just in the center with 38 agents. Did
>>not like the agents leaving there desk ie.
Hello,
Wednesday, December 18, 2002, 2:25:36 PM, you wrote:
>> Very serious about this. Senior VP was setting in call center
>> yesterday and was not happy with the bottle neck at fax machines. I
>> have set up 4 just in the center with 38 agents. Did not like the
>> agents leaving the
Rasmus,
> I was using the imail syslog server, I just switched it to local
> file logging to see what will happen. If the result is the same,
> I'll try Kiwi syslog.
Sounds good. Were you using 127.0.0.1 as the IP, just out of
curiosity?
> Am I correct in assuming that i
Hi John,
Are you recommending this patch ONLY be applied to win2k/xp servers? Also,
is it cumulative containing the prior 2 HF's ?
Bryan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Korsak
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:52 AM
To: [EMAIL P
v6.06 here, I agree.
Jeff
*
TymeWyse Internet
P.O.Box 84 - 583 N. Main St., Canyonville, OR 97417
tel/fax: (541) 839-6027 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTE
Check your firewall settings(?) Got it fine here (unless of course they
just fixed it). :-0
- Tony
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bryant Nielson
>Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:28 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [IMail F
Not bad turn around and Ipswitch was listening! Thanks.
-Don S.
Please verify your version and use one of the following links
to download the appropriate hotfix...
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ip
I installed HF2 and then recopied IAdmin.exe, IMailsec.dll and Mailbox.dll
to my local machine but now I cannot connect to the mail server.
It give me "Failed to load host data."
Anyone else experiencing this problem?
Trent
---
Trent M. Davenport - Systems Administrator
Northern Televisi
Works GREAT here, Thanks John & IPSwitch!
~Rick
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bryant Nielson
> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:28 PM - FamHost
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] IMail Server 7.13 Hotfix 2
>
>
> Very serious about this. Senior VP was setting in call center
> yesterday and was not happy with the bottle neck at fax machines. I
> have set up 4 just in the center with 38 agents. Did not like the
> agents leaving there desk ie. the phone.
You have a crazy need for a fax server.
>
It would help if you could download the file!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Korsak
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail Forum] IMail Server 7.13 Hotfix 2
IMail Forum:
Ipswitch has ident
Very serious about this. Senior VP was setting in call center
yesterday and was not happy with the bottle neck at fax machines. I
have set up 4 just in the center with 38 agents. Did
not like the agents leaving there desk ie. the phone.
that's typical, as I said, sending faxes electronically
I've found the Faxmaker to be one pretty reliable. Granted, with only 16
people in our office we don't use it nearly as much as you will. I like the
fact that Faxmaker is more flexible in terms of the fax/modems it will work
with. Many products out will only support 1 or 2 fax/modem cards, which ar
Clay,
Thanks for the time spent on helping me with this. I think the problem I
have is associated with LDAP not being accessed. I will check into it
further to make sure.
Again Thanks!
Kevin
6)
THIS IS THE BIGGY!!!
If IMail can not access the LDAP folder (located in the user domains top d
Check out RightFax.
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Ingram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Fax to email/email to fax
> Hello,
>
> Fax to email. Email to Fax.
>
> Where to start?
> What are people
If you know of better products please let me know. Anything in Linux
that could save us .
Probably the most widely used for *nix is hylafax, which has been around
for years and should be quite mature.
Len
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
Hello,
Wednesday, December 18, 2002, 12:18:07 PM, you wrote:
>> Fax to email. Email to Fax.
>>
>> Where to start?
>> What are people using?
>> Does it really save money?
>> Is Imail good at this?
>>
>> I am at google now. But if someone has
>> links or ideas please let me know.
Have no other problems on my box with several other apps. This appears to
localized to Imail. It needs to be addressed. Removing security patches is
not an option.
FWIW, the Microsoft patch broke existing functionality. The patch does 2
things: [1] It fixes a security flaw, and [2] "includes
> Could someone please let me know, how to do this, or send me a link
> that would explain how it is done..
Google for mHonArc.
> In Imail???
No.
-Sandy
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.co
IMail Forum:
Ipswitch has identified a window placement issue with the IMail
Administrator for users who are running Windows 2000 or Windows XP and have
applied Microsoft security update Q328310. To address this problem we have
released two Hotfixes: 7.13 Hotfix 2 for all customers running IMail
Hello,
I am working at a customer's that is running imail 5.08.
They are having problems with mail being routed to the wrong recipients.
For example, a messages comes into the imail box from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and is
addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED], however, the message is getting delivered by
i
6.06 user... thought I was having a 60's flashback.
Have no other problems on my box with several other apps. This appears to
localized to Imail. It needs to be addressed. Removing security patches is
not an option.
(steps off soapbox)
Cody
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
> Is there anyway I can get a copy of this prior to purchase? I'd just
like to know system requirements, component requirements, what services I
need to be running, how much of a burden it will place on the server,
difficulty of installation...etc, BEFORE I decide to put it in my existing
configur
Hasn't anyone noticed how Imail Admin draws the right pane?
I am using Terminal Server and sometimes it slows down the picture transitions so you
can see it in slow motion. The right pane starts being drawn from the lower right
corner.
That's where it gets stuck after the patch.
-Original
removing the fax systems can really save us time and money. It does
appear that some branchs go through 2-3 fax toners a month + paper!
I really don't not like doing the numbers end of this kind of thing.
fax servers are great for saving labor on the sending side (no need for
hard copy to fee
Hello,
Wednesday, December 18, 2002, 11:25:12 AM, you wrote:
Troy> Well, we tried to use the IMail fax optin but it stunk IMO, so we bought a
Troy> product by GFI (www.gfi.com) called FaxMaker. It works well. May be worth a
Troy> look-see.
Thanks!!! This looks to be something like I am after.
W
Fax to email. Email to Fax.
Where to start?
What are people using?
Does it really save money?
Is Imail good at this?
I am at google now. But if someone has
links or ideas please let me know. Thanks.
are you just curious or do you have client request for this service?
The qua
Hello, and how is everyone doing this week before Christmas?
To the point of the message
I have had several of our mailing list users ask if we would ever
consider having an Mailing List Archive Page?
Could someone please let me know, how to do this, or send me a link that
would explain ho
I also agree.
6.06 user here.
- Tony
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jorge Barosa
>Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:06 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Windows Update Q328310
>
>
>I have the 6.06 version, and c
I have the 6.06 version, and complety agree whith you.
Ipswitch must do someting to supress this situation.
Jorge Barosa
- Original Message -
From: "Panda Consulting S.A - Luis Alberto Arango" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:01 PM
Subject:
Well, we tried to use the IMail fax optin but it stunk IMO, so we bought a
product by GFI (www.gfi.com) called FaxMaker. It works well. May be worth a
look-see.
Troy D. Hilton
SofWerks LLC.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf O
"R. Scott Perry" wrote:
> >But the problem happens under multiple browsers that are in the
> >browser.cap and with multiple accounts. If it was a browser problem
> >replacing or deleting the mbx file should have no effect. Also new
> >mail accounts should have a clean setup and not have any pro
Hello,
Fax to email. Email to Fax.
Where to start?
What are people using?
Does it really save money?
Is Imail good at this?
I am at google now. But if someone has
links or ideas please let me know. Thanks.
--
Best regards,
~Paul~
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Decl
I think I'll try to stick with RFC compliance ;)
It's amazing how may other email based problems miraculously working once I
fixed it.
Thanks for the info.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 8:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROT
Is it possible that certain addresses are triggering anti spam responses?
Ron
-- Original Message --
From: Sanford Whiteman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:54:48 -0500
> since this is hosted on a shared server
I have tested about 15 different third party applications in w2k systems
with the new patch and also a couple of third party software in our
production server. All third party software don't show any GUI problems.
Only software with problems is IMAIL Administrator. I also tested Imail
Client and wo
thats what I was afraid of. I had originally checked the "NUL <> Sender?"
as a measure to prevent spam.
You're not the only one. You may want to complain to Ipswitch, especially
if you did get listed in a spam database for using their option that breaks
your RFC compliance, and annoys other
Scott,
thats what I was afraid of. I had originally checked the "NUL <> Sender?"
as a measure to prevent spam.
But I'm only also only relaying mail for IP ranges and authenticated users.
So I doubt I'll end up on orbs or anything lists like that, again.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: R. S
Hello All,
Is there a way to assign multiple names in the address book to BCC on a
message. No matter how many I select, it only ever adds one. Also, there
seems to be a limit to the number of characters I can add by hand. Do I have
to send the message multiple times to get it BCC'd?
TIA,
Ben
I was using the imail syslog server, I just switched it to local file
logging to see what will happen. If the result is the same, I'll try Kiwi
syslog.
Am I correct in assuming that i should just stop the Imail syslog service
and start Kiwi to get Imail to log to Kiwi?
I'll post again later toda
85 matches
Mail list logo
