Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol load monitor translucency

2013-11-25 Thread Rolf Huehne
On 11/25/2013 05:35 PM, Angel Herráez wrote: >> That would be tricky to do without going into the JSmol code >> and changing it directly. Do so only if you do not worry about future >> JSmol updates. > > It should be possible to chenge that using a CSS rule that overrides > what is set in source co

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol load monitor translucency

2013-11-25 Thread Angel Herráez
> That would be tricky to do without going into the JSmol code > and changing it directly. Do so only if you do not worry about future > JSmol updates. It should be possible to chenge that using a CSS rule that overrides what is set in source code. You just need to identify the ID of the eleme

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol load monitor translucency

2013-11-25 Thread Rolf Huehne
On 11/25/2013 05:14 PM, Robert Hanson wrote: > These are really just for debugging. Is there anything there you really > need to see? They are supposed to be just for a bit of debugging -- I don't > recommend them for production. > The reason why I wanted to activate the messages (especially for p

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol load monitor translucency

2013-11-25 Thread Robert Hanson
These are really just for debugging. Is there anything there you really need to see? They are supposed to be just for a bit of debugging -- I don't recommend them for production. Not so easy to modify, as ClazzLoaderProgressMonitor (in j2sjmol.js) is loaded only if necessary, specifically before t

[Jmol-users] JSmol load monitor translucency

2013-11-25 Thread Rolf Huehne
Hi all, if you set 'disableJ2SLoadMonitor' to "false" in 'Info' some messages are displayed at the left bottom of the browser window while JSmol is loaded. Unfortunately these messages are unreadable if there is some other text at the same position. This happens because the background of

Re: [Jmol-users] jsmol stereo bug

2013-11-15 Thread Robert Hanson
Thanks for letting me know about that, George. Easy fix. I just forgot to implement stereo. see http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/zip/jmol-13.3.9_2013.11.15.zip On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 4:53 AM, lisensky wrote: > Has anybody made the stereo command work in jsmol? > > I get black at the bottom

Re: [Jmol-users] jsmol stereo bug

2013-11-14 Thread Robert Hanson
Ah, probably forgot to check that On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 4:53 AM, lisensky wrote: > Has anybody made the stereo command work in jsmol? > > I get black at the bottom and squished panes at the top. > The redblue and redcyan stereo works fine but plain stereo does not. > Java jmol does not h

[Jmol-users] jsmol stereo bug

2013-11-14 Thread lisensky
Has anybody made the stereo command work in jsmol? I get black at the bottom and squished panes at the top. The redblue and redcyan stereo works fine but plain stereo does not. Java jmol does not have this problem. It looks like the vertical value of the stereo wind

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol

2013-11-08 Thread Spinney, Richard
>ps -- it's not even supposed to be checking for that in your case; that's a >problem also in JSmolCore.js: > >isBinary &= Jmol._canSyncBinary(); > >should read > >if (isBinary) > isBinary = Jmol._canSyncBinary(); Hi Bob, Downloaded 13.3.9_2013.11.02 and the compressed files

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol

2013-11-02 Thread Robert Hanson
We are poor; they are rich. It's just a dependable call that can flag whether binary file reading is possible. -- Robert M. Hanson Larson-Anderson Professor of Chemistry St. Olaf College Northfield, MN http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr If nature does not answer first what we want, it is bet

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol

2013-11-02 Thread john francis lee
What is the relationship between jsmol and google? On 11/02/2013 11:58 PM, Robert Hanson wrote: oops, my bad. You are using https, and JSmol is making a quick call to http://google.com to test the connection. You could try just changing that to https in JSmolCore.js and see how that works. O

[Jmol-users] JSmol update; JSpecView, JSME

2013-11-02 Thread Robert Hanson
Jmol users, http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/zip/jmol-13.3.9_2013.11.02.zip is now available. This fixes a problem with JSME getting pushed out of the window in certain blogs, I hope. See http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/jsmol/jsmetest.htm and http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/jsmol/jsmetest2.htm

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol

2013-11-02 Thread Robert Hanson
neat idea; doesn't work with AJAX in jQuery. On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Angel Herráez wrote: > > oops, my bad. You are using https, and JSmol is making a quick call > to > > http://google.com to test the connection. > > You could try just changing that to https in JSmolCore.js

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol

2013-11-02 Thread Angel Herráez
> oops, my bad. You are using https, and JSmol is making a quick call to > http://google.com to test the connection. > You could try just changing that to https in JSmolCore.js and see how > that > works. I've read recently about using urls without the protocol part in order to

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol

2013-11-02 Thread Robert Hanson
ps -- it's not even supposed to be checking for that in your case; that's a problem also in JSmolCore.js: isBinary &= Jmol._canSyncBinary(); should read if (isBinary) isBinary = Jmol._canSyncBinary(); On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Robert Hanson wrote: > oops, my bad. Y

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol

2013-11-02 Thread Robert Hanson
oops, my bad. You are using https, and JSmol is making a quick call to http://google.com to test the connection. You could try just changing that to https in JSmolCore.js and see how that works. On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Spinney, Richard < rspin...@chemistry.ohio-state.edu> wrote: > The l

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol

2013-11-01 Thread Spinney, Richard
The link is: https://undergrad-ed.chemistry.ohio-state.edu/VSEPR/3d-jsmol.html -- Dr. Richard Spinney Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry The Ohio State University 120A Celeste Laboratory 120 West 18th Ave Columbus, Ohio 43210 email: rspin...@chemistry.oh

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol

2013-11-01 Thread Robert Hanson
You sure your page is in that domain? Give me a url to the page itself, please. Clicking that link suggests it is working just fine, delivering a small .gz file encoded using base64 as requested. On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Spinney, Richard < rspin...@chemistry.ohio-state.edu> wrote: > Hi

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol

2013-11-01 Thread Spinney, Richard
Hi Bob, It is web based, I am not doing any local file access at all. jsmol.php is on the server and the URL is set correctly, I get an error message now of " Error connecting to server: http://undergrad-ed.chemistry.ohio-state.edu/VSEPR/jsmol.php?call=getRawDataFromDatabase&database=_&query=ht

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol

2013-11-01 Thread Robert Hanson
1) big differences if you are loading locally. Always try a test website and see if the same problem happens there. 2) jsmol.php must be on YOUR server, not mine (domain where pages are hosted) 3) Use Firefox for local file reading. You will have to set about:config to allow local file access. p

[Jmol-users] JSmol

2013-11-01 Thread Spinney, Richard
I am starting to convert my old Jmol stuff to JSmol (13.2.8) and I am getting an error message that loading j2s/core/package.js failed. Is there a requirement that the html pages be in the jsmol root. I have also noticed a strange error message "Blocked loading mixed active content http://googl

Re: [Jmol-users] jsmol 13.2.7 "Script error: Unexpected token <"

2013-10-08 Thread Robert Hanson
Please try the files at http://sourceforge.net/projects/jsmol/files/ I just downloaded that, moved the j2s directory to ../../js, and it worked fine. On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Naomi Fox wrote: > I just updated to the latest stable version of jsmol from the Jmol 13.2.7 > full download. >

Re: [Jmol-users] jsmol 13.2.7 "Script error: Unexpected token <"

2013-10-05 Thread sw
Me too Quoting Naomi Fox : > I just updated to the latest stable version of jsmol from the Jmol 13.2.7 > full download. > > When I loaded the jmol viewer in my web page, I got the following error: > > > Jmol applet jmol_object__004228470381349__ ready > call loadScript ..\..\js\J\viewer\Sc

[Jmol-users] jsmol 13.2.7 "Script error: Unexpected token <"

2013-10-03 Thread Naomi Fox
I just updated to the latest stable version of jsmol from the Jmol 13.2.7 full download. When I loaded the jmol viewer in my web page, I got the following error: Jmol applet jmol_object__004228470381349__ ready call loadScript ..\..\js\J\viewer\ScriptManager.js [Java2Script] Script error: Un

Re: [Jmol-users] jsmol -- local file reading/drag drop and local file writing

2013-09-17 Thread Robert Hanson
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Otis Rothenberger wrote: > Bob, > > I have a biochemist friend doing some testing of the local read/write. It > works on my Mac Safari for small molecules. > > On the write dialog box, is there any way to trap a cancel button before > the cancel result hits the se

Re: [Jmol-users] jsmol -- local file reading/drag drop and local file writing

2013-09-17 Thread Otis Rothenberger
Bob, I have a biochemist friend doing some testing of the local read/write. It works on my Mac Safari for small molecules. On the write dialog box, is there any way to trap a cancel button before the cancel result hits the server PHP? As it is, a cancel simply generates a PHP error that's auto

Re: [Jmol-users] Jsmol: Problem downloading png/jmol

2013-09-17 Thread Jaime Prilusky
Add php to the file location. Change the path to /jmol/jsmol/php/jsmol.php Jaim On Sep 17, 2013, at 1:57 PM, björn wrote: > Hello, > > i use jsmol on my website. > Everthing works fine but i cannot download the view anymore (as png or jsmol). > > I changed nothing. > > I got the following e

[Jmol-users] Jsmol: Problem downloading png/jmol

2013-09-17 Thread björn
Hello, i use jsmol on my website. Everthing works fine but i cannot download the view anymore (as png or jsmol). I changed nothing. I got the following error message: Not Found The requested URL /jmol/jsmol/jsmol.php was not found on this server. -

Re: [Jmol-users] jsmol -- local file reading/drag drop and local file writing

2013-09-16 Thread Amjad Farooq
Thanks Bob! My apologies for being so negative about IE. I have always had a terrible time with it. But, of course, good luck to others. Amjad *AMJAD FAROOQ PhD DIC | Associate Professor Dept of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology | Miller School of Medicine | University of Miami | Miami | FL 33136 L

Re: [Jmol-users] jsmol -- local file reading/drag drop and local file writing

2013-09-16 Thread Robert Hanson
Great. My pleasure. (Actually not, because I really hate to dig into the data stream code.) Thanks for the advice. It should require MSIE 10, which is what I tested it on. MSIE 9 doesn't have the FileLoader interface, I think. But except for this, we support back to MSIE 9 at least. Bob ps - P

Re: [Jmol-users] jsmol -- local file reading/drag drop and local file writing

2013-09-16 Thread Amjad Farooq
Bob, Beautiful! What can I say? You are awesome, man. So, on my side, I tested the following commands that you just enabled on Firefox and Chrome: "load ?.pdb" "write FILE ?.pdb" "write JPG ?.jpg" "write PNG ?.png" They all work on both browsers. I did not have much luck on IE. But, do we care?

Re: [Jmol-users] jsmol -- local file reading/drag drop and local file writing

2013-09-16 Thread Robert Hanson
That's also now in place at http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/jsmol/jsmol.htm If you have trouble, clear your cache and try again. I had to do that to get Firefox to move to the latest upload. Uploading of local files: load ? # displays a dialog over the applet x = load("?") # all

[Jmol-users] jsmol -- local file reading/drag drop and local file writing

2013-09-16 Thread Robert Hanson
OK. I have uploaded changes to Jmol that allow JSmol/HTML5 to read and write files to a local drive. Whew! That was tricky -- text, binary, zip, gzip, pngj, xml -- I checked as many as I could find. Please test on a variety of platforms: http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/zip/jmol-13.3.6_2013.09.16

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol loading local files from remote page

2013-09-14 Thread Amjad Farooq
Hi Bob, Thanks for the new JSmol copy. I just tested it on Firefox 23 and it seems faster than the previous version. Also, the following commands are working on my side too: "load ?.pdb" "write JPG ?.jpg " "write PNG ?.png " but these commands do not work yet: "write FILE ?.pdb " or "write PDB ?

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol loading local files from remote page

2013-09-14 Thread Robert Hanson
way ahead of you. On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Amjad Farooq wrote: > > (1) Please also enable file save feature (in other words, allow users to > save PDB coordinates from JSmol onto their local machine). > > WRITE FILE "xxx.pdb" But I see that's not quite working right yet. > (2) The

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol loading local files from remote page

2013-09-13 Thread Amjad Farooq
Hi Bob, This is awesome! You did it. Yes -- your file upload feature works beautiful now. I love it. Thank you. A few more things for you to look at: (1) Please also enable file save feature (in other words, allow users to save PDB coordinates from JSmol onto their local machine). (2) The imag

[Jmol-users] JSmol loading local files from remote page

2013-09-13 Thread Robert Hanson
See http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/jsmol/simple2.htm?USE=HTML5 Click on "Load File" http://chemapps/stolaf.edu/jmol/zip/jmol-13.3.6_2013.09.13.zip Has not been tested on Macs. Pretty sure it will not work in MSIE9. Bob -- Robert M. Hanson Larson-Anderson Professor of Chemistry St. Olaf Colleg

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol too slow!

2013-09-12 Thread Robert Hanson
it's not working. I need to get it working, and I will get back to you. -- How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments: 1. Consolidate legacy IT systems to a single system of record for IT 2. Standardize and glo

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol too slow!

2013-09-12 Thread Amjad Farooq
Bob, If I misunderstood you, could you please forward me a link of one your JSmol pages, where file upload/save feature from a local machine is working. I need to see to believe that this really works with JSmol. Thanks! Amjad On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Robert Hanson wrote: > hmm.

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol too slow!

2013-09-12 Thread Robert Hanson
hmm. Could be something not working there. I will check. On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Amjad Farooq wrote: > Bob, > > Got it! > > But, such file upload appears to be limited to only from the server. What > if one of your collaborators or someone else in the lab wants to upload a > file to yo

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol too slow!

2013-09-12 Thread Amjad Farooq
Bob, Got it! But, such file upload appears to be limited to only from the server. What if one of your collaborators or someone else in the lab wants to upload a file to your JSmol web interface from their local machine? They would like a regular prompt that Jmol offers. How can one make that poss

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol too slow!

2013-09-12 Thread Robert Hanson
sure it does. The command is load ? or load ?.pdb e.g. You will need jsmol.php on your server and point to it using Info.serverURL if using HTML5. (JSmol will send the file to the server and retrieve the "reflection" back.) Bob -

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol too slow!

2013-09-11 Thread Angel Herráez
Why not? JSmol should do all that Jmol can do What methos were you using in Jmol? > I also noticed that the JSmol does not have the capability to prompt > you for a file upload from your local drive For example, Jmol.script('myJmol', 'load ?'); (havent' tested that, but I think it is corr

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol too slow!

2013-09-11 Thread Angel Herráez
El 11 Sep 2013 a las 11:54, Amjad Farooq escribió: > That worked beautiful and loaded the PDB file into "jmolApplet0" from > another frame: Good to know :) The relevant concept is that "Jmol" is a Javascript object with methods. As such, it belongs to the page. So you must target the page load

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol too slow!

2013-09-11 Thread Rolf Huehne
On 09/11/2013 06:52 PM, Angel Herráez wrote: > Why not? JSmol should do all that Jmol can do > > What methos were you using in Jmol? > >> I also noticed that the JSmol does not have the capability to prompt >> you for a file upload from your local drive > > For example, > Jmol.script('myJmol',

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol too slow!

2013-09-11 Thread Amjad Farooq
Yep, I agree with Rolf: It is not even possible to upload a PDB file from your local machine using the pop-up feature of JSmol. However, in my original query, I was referring to uploading a PDB file from your local machine using the JmolMenu script as follows: Jmol.jmolMenu(jmolApplet0, [ ["nul

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol too slow!

2013-09-11 Thread Amjad Farooq
Thanks Angel! That worked beautiful and loaded the PDB file into "jmolApplet0" from another frame: e.g. function pdb() { Jmol.script(parent.TargetFrame.jmolApplet0, "load=1SHC") } Load PDB Amjad On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 4:04 AM, Angel Herráez wrote: > 1. Please, remember that JSmol is do

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol too slow!

2013-09-11 Thread Amjad Farooq
Angel, I also noticed that the JSmol does not have the capability to prompt you for a file upload from your local drive (or to save a file on a local machine). Is this something that would become available in the near future? This would be a very useful feature to add to bring JSmol virtually on p

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol too slow!

2013-09-11 Thread Angel Herráez
1. Please, remember that JSmol is documented (if not extensively at least the basics) in the Jmol Wiki. 2. I haven't been able to make JSmol works across frames. I did not try further, maybe it's possible. I'd say you need to address the Jmol object in the target frame and not the one in the cu

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol too slow!

2013-09-10 Thread Amjad Farooq
Thanks Paul! Thanks Bob! You guys are awesome. The Jmol.script() worked right away when invoked from inside the same page as the one that has jmolApplet0 specified. But, I still have one silly problem. I would like to call this script from another frame. In other words, my jmolApplet0 is loaded i

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol too slow!

2013-09-10 Thread Amjad Farooq
Bob, I checked out your new JSmol page with the protein loaded in at: http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/jsmol/simple.htm The response time for this JSmol page is very fast and on par with Jmol. I see no differences between the two with this new JSmol javascript that you are using. So, kudos to you!

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol in wordpress

2013-09-10 Thread Robert Hanson
worked but took a long time to load with all the other stuff going on on that page as well. On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:29 PM, pino.stricc...@libero.it < pino.stricc...@libero.it> wrote: > Dear friends, finally i succeded to put JSmol inside Wordpress. It works. > > What happened before, i dont kn

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol in wordpress

2013-09-10 Thread Greg Edwards
Pino, It works fine for me. Mac OS X 10.6.8 Chrome latest (29.0.1547.65) - smooth motion Firefox 23.0.1 - smooth Safari 5.1.9 - slightly jerky, still making maybe 12 - 15Hz Opera 12.16 - slightly jerky Can you display render time / frame rate from the JSmol popup ? Cheers, Greg E On 11 Septe

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol too slow!

2013-09-10 Thread Robert Hanson
The distribution includes a file jmol2.js which allows the older jsmol.js syntax such as jmolButton() jmolScript() etc. to be used without change. I think they are all implemented. But the new way is recommended: Jmol.jmolButton(appletID, "script", "label") see http://wiki.jmol.org/index

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol too slow!

2013-09-10 Thread Paul Pillot
Try: Jmol.script(jmolAppletObjectNameComesHere,"load =PDBID") where jmolAppletObjectNameComesHere is the name you gave to your jmol object instance at creation Paul Le 10 sept. 2013 à 18:01, Amjad Farooq a écrit : > Bob, > > I checked out your new JSmol page with the protein loaded in at: >

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol too slow!

2013-09-10 Thread Amjad Farooq
muchisimas gracias angel! plz when u guys have time, add the JmolScript and JmolMenu features to JSmol. Those are my favorite features in Jmol and it would be great to have them in JSmol too. Otherwise, I think JSmol rocks. Being able to do Jmol without the nasty Java is awesome. amjad On T

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol too slow!

2013-09-10 Thread Angel Herráez
Haven't got time now, sorry. I'll add to my to-do list > Angel, I'd appreciate your assessment of > set platformSpeed -- How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments: 1. Consolidate legacy IT systems to a si

[Jmol-users] JSmol in wordpress

2013-09-10 Thread pino.stricc...@libero.it
Dear friends, finally i succeded to put JSmol inside Wordpress. It works. What happened before, i dont know. It remain to be seen until what grade it works.The url is this http://pinostriccoli.altervista.org/?p=6434 If you can check the page it would be nice ...Pino -

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol too slow!

2013-09-10 Thread Robert Hanson
Angel, I'd appreciate your assessment of set platformSpeed Are there settings that you prefer for specific types of compounds? What would you recommend for proteins in general? Bob On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Angel Herráez wrote: > > Something odd there. That's not been our experience.

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol too slow!

2013-09-09 Thread Angel Herráez
> Something odd there. That's not been our experience. Well, my experience is that Java Jmol is faster than JSmol. Of course this has improved a lot in the las few months and now it's rather tolerable, and all depends on the size of the molecule loaded and even personal perception, but for me y

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol too slow!

2013-09-09 Thread Robert Hanson
Note that Info.use="JAVA HTML5" (the auto-switching idea) no longer works. Pages have no way to know if Java access is blocked anymore. On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Maciek Wójcikowski wrote: > That's right. What's more, if you prefer one version (Java/JavaScript) > over another you can s

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol too slow!

2013-09-09 Thread Maciek Wójcikowski
That's right. What's more, if you prefer one version (Java/JavaScript) over another you can switch between them seamlessly. Provided you've configured everything properly. You can see that here - http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/jsmol/test2.htm JSmol is still lagy compared to Jmol, but it's far bet

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol too slow!

2013-09-09 Thread Robert Hanson
I think you have the syntax right. Looks right to me, anyway. I don't know that you need Jmol.loadFile(). Just create the script: Jmol.script(jmolApplet0,'load =1blu;display not water;select protein or nucleic;cartoons only;color structure;select *') On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Amjad Faro

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol too slow!

2013-09-09 Thread Robert Hanson
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Amjad Farooq wrote: > What is the long-term goal? Is JSmol eventually going to replace Jmol? Is > the future about having an app that does not rely on an external Java > plugin? > Exactly. The future is now. The Java plugin is no longer usable on general public p

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol too slow!

2013-09-09 Thread Robert Hanson
Something odd there. That's not been our experience. This is at what page? What structures? What platform? (Is this an older iPad, for instance?) Trying to read PyMOL files that have one or more molecular surfaces? Define "much much slower". First try pages such as http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jm

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol too slow!

2013-09-08 Thread Amjad Farooq
Hi Bob, What is the syntax for placing JSmol commands such as: Jmol.script(jmolApplet0,'select *;cartoons off;wireframe -0.1') and Jmol.loadFile(jmolApplet0,'=1blu',';display not water;select protein or nucleic;cartoons only;color structure;select *')"> inside a regular javascript. For example:

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol too slow!

2013-09-08 Thread Amjad Farooq
Bob, As you advised, I added the "set the platformSpeed 1" line to the applet when loading PDB file. It improved the speed considerably to a level that I am very happy with. But, I still believe, JSmol somewhat suffers from the speed issue and Jmol is noticeably much more smoother when moving stru

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol too slow!

2013-09-08 Thread Amjad Farooq
Bob, I tried JSmol on both firefox 23 and chrome under both Fedora 15 and Windows 7. In all cases, JSmol appeared to be much much slower than Jmol. How and where do I set the platform speed? Please advise accordingly. Thank you, Amjad On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Robert Hanson wrote:

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol too slow!

2013-09-08 Thread Robert Hanson
This is on what platform? Did you use set platformSpeed 1? Bob On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Amjad Farooq wrote: > Hi Bob, > > Just to let you know that I tried the new version of JSmol. > > JSmol runs very slow when viewing proteins compared to Jmol. So, in short, > JSmol is cool if one

Re: [Jmol-users] jsmol issue

2013-09-08 Thread Angel Herráez
Geoffrey, maybe a cached/noncached difference in those files that work or not? -- Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more! Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft tec

[Jmol-users] JSmol too slow!

2013-09-08 Thread Amjad Farooq
Hi Bob, Just to let you know that I tried the new version of JSmol. JSmol runs very slow when viewing proteins compared to Jmol. So, in short, JSmol is cool if one can do all this without the need for an external Java but the slow speed of JSmol is a big deterrent to using it in everyday work and

Re: [Jmol-users] jsmol issue

2013-09-08 Thread Paul Pillot
Not exactly the subject, but when downloading a pdb file from RCSB website, the server checks if the browser accepts compressions and compress the pdb file on the file. You don't have to explicitly request a pdb.gz file to get the benefits from data compression. Paul Le 8 sept. 2013 à 08:25, Ge

Re: [Jmol-users] jsmol issue

2013-09-08 Thread Geoffrey Rowland
I *think* I understand what is going on here. The problem appears due to inconsistencies in the way the pdb files are gzipped up In my jsmol /data folder: 1crn.pdb.gz is not actually gzipped at all, just a plain text file identical to 1crn.pdb. However, if 1crn.pdb is gzipped to make a bona fide

Re: [Jmol-users] jsmol issue

2013-09-08 Thread Geoffrey Rowland
Err... Actually though .pse files now work with Chrome, I am still seeing an issue with some .pdb.gz files (e.g. data/1m19.pdb.gz, data/3hz7.pdb.gz) though data/1crn.pdb.gz still works! Forgot the RCSB links were now using .pdb rather than .pdb.gz and can't easily check against the Stolaf server

Re: [Jmol-users] jsmol issue

2013-09-08 Thread Robert Hanson
ok -- crossed in the night there. So tell us what the story is with Chrome... On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Robert Hanson wrote: > If you mean running a local page via Chrome, I'm pretty sure that's > impossible. Just use Firefox for local file access. > > > On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 4:51 AM, Ge

Re: [Jmol-users] jsmol issue

2013-09-08 Thread Robert Hanson
If you mean running a local page via Chrome, I'm pretty sure that's impossible. Just use Firefox for local file access. On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 4:51 AM, Geoffrey Rowland wrote: > > ...though still have problems with Chrome and binary files the with a > download and local webserver installation of

Re: [Jmol-users] jsmol issue

2013-09-08 Thread Geoffrey Rowland
Please ignore my last post. Forgot to set things up to point at my local jsmol.php! Can now display .pdb.gz and .pse binary files. Cheers >On 8 September 2013 09:51, Geoffrey Rowland wrote: > > ...though still have problems with Chrome and binary files the with a > download and local webserver

Re: [Jmol-users] jsmol issue

2013-09-08 Thread Geoffrey Rowland
...though still have problems with Chrome and binary files the with a download and local webserver installation of the latest (07-Sep-2013) Jmol.zip bundle from http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/zip/. About... reports the JSmol version as slightly older (13.2.5 2013-09-06 12:26:07) than the version

Re: [Jmol-users] jsmol issue

2013-09-08 Thread Geoffrey Rowland
All now seems to be working (Firefox, Chrome, Chromium, Opera on Fedora 19; Firefox, Chrome, Opera, IE 10 on Windows 7) for http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/jsmol/jsmol.htm Seeing Jmol/JSmol version 13.2.5 2013-09-06 12:28:49 Thanks

Re: [Jmol-users] jsmol issue

2013-09-07 Thread Robert Hanson
oh, joy. I'm SLOWLY uploading http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/zip/Jmol.zip now. (From the ACS meeting in Indianapolis) On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Bays Philip wrote: > Bob: Everything now works on the Mac in Safari, Chrome, and Firefox:-) > > > On Sep 7, 2013, at 6:13 PM, Robert Hans

Re: [Jmol-users] jsmol issue

2013-09-07 Thread Bays Philip
Bob: Everything now works on the Mac in Safari, Chrome, and Firefox:-) On Sep 7, 2013, at 6:13 PM, Robert Hanson wrote: > http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/jsmol/jsmol.htm J. Philip Bays Emeritus Professor of Chemistry Department of Chemistry and Physics Saint Mary's College Notre Dame, IN 465

Re: [Jmol-users] jsmol issue

2013-09-07 Thread Robert Hanson
I have to upload new files to SourceForge and chemapps. Should be complete in 30 minutes or so. On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Geoffrey Rowland wrote: > > In case it helps... > > http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/jsmol/jsmol.htm (Jmol 13.5.5 2013-09-06) > is fully working for Firefox and Opera,

Re: [Jmol-users] jsmol issue

2013-09-07 Thread Robert Hanson
Just fixed that. Please try again. On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Geoffrey Rowland wrote: > > In case it helps... > > http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/jsmol/jsmol.htm (Jmol 13.5.5 2013-09-06) > is fully working for Firefox and Opera, including binary files. :-) > > The new RCSB links (using .pd

[Jmol-users] jsmol issue

2013-09-07 Thread Geoffrey Rowland
In case it helps... http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/jsmol/jsmol.htm (Jmol 13.5.5 2013-09-06) is fully working for Firefox and Opera, including binary files. :-) The new RCSB links (using .pdb rather than .pdb.gz) are working for Chrome. ;-) However, binary files (e.g. .pse or .gz) are now not wo

Re: [Jmol-users] jsmol issue

2013-09-07 Thread J. Bays
Yes. J. Philip Bays Emeritus Professor of Chemistry Saint Mary's College Notre Dame, IN 46556 Sent from my iPhone On Sep 7, 2013, at 7:49 AM, Robert Hanson wrote: oh, that's sad to hear. Phil, will you be around in the next hour or so to help me test? I can work on it for just a short while.

Re: [Jmol-users] jsmol issue

2013-09-07 Thread Philip Bays
It works now! On Sep 7, 2013, at 8:08 AM, Robert Hanson wrote: > OK, that was just my site not having been updated, I think. Please try that > again. > > > On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 6:48 AM, Robert Hanson wrote: > oh, that's sad to hear. Phil, will you be around in the next hour or so to > hel

Re: [Jmol-users] jsmol issue

2013-09-07 Thread Robert Hanson
OK, that was just my site not having been updated, I think. Please try that again. On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 6:48 AM, Robert Hanson wrote: > oh, that's sad to hear. Phil, will you be around in the next hour or so to > help me test? I can work on it for just a short while. What have I done > >

Re: [Jmol-users] jsmol issue

2013-09-07 Thread Robert Hanson
oh, that's sad to hear. Phil, will you be around in the next hour or so to help me test? I can work on it for just a short while. What have I done Bob On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Bays Philip wrote: > No. Now we are back to the straight line issue. > > > On Sep 7, 2013, at 7:40 AM, Ro

Re: [Jmol-users] jsmol issue

2013-09-07 Thread Bays Philip
No. Now we are back to the straight line issue. On Sep 7, 2013, at 7:40 AM, Robert Hanson wrote: > Nonetheless, if someone with a Mac could check the right-most column links of > http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/jsmol/jsmol.htm today, I would appreciate > it. I changed the PDB links so tha

Re: [Jmol-users] jsmol issue

2013-09-07 Thread Robert Hanson
Nonetheless, if someone with a Mac could check the right-most column links of http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/jsmol/jsmol.htm today, I would appreciate it. I changed the PDB links so that if the case one does not have binary transfer capability (Safari and Chrome), then the ".gz" will be removed

Re: [Jmol-users] jsmol issue

2013-09-07 Thread Robert Hanson
OK, this is an internal IT problem at St. Olaf. I will get onto it. Probably will not be fixed until Monday. On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 4:34 AM, Robert Hanson wrote: > I wasn't able to update that site because of VPN problems I had in Europe. > But I'm back in the US. Thanks for the reminder. Updat

Re: [Jmol-users] jsmol issue

2013-09-07 Thread Robert Hanson
I wasn't able to update that site because of VPN problems I had in Europe. But I'm back in the US. Thanks for the reminder. Updating now On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Philip Bays wrote: > I have been out of the loop for week or so. I still find that if I go to > the following link, none

[Jmol-users] jsmol issue

2013-09-06 Thread Philip Bays
I have been out of the loop for week or so. I still find that if I go to the following link, none of the RCSB links work in Mac Chrome or Safari. Was the issue solved? I have cleared the cache and the java cache to no avail. http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/jsmol/jsmol.htm Philip Bays Emeri

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol hacks to jQuery removed

2013-08-22 Thread Robert Hanson
OK, so right now I've released these: jsmol-13.3.4.zip Jmol-13.3.4 Jmol-13.2.4 and I've got it working to also release jsmol-13.2.4.zip Thanks for the comments. Bob On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Rolf Huehne wrote: > On 08/22/2013 05:56 PM, Angel Herráez wrote: > >> How important is it

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol hacks to jQuery removed

2013-08-22 Thread Rolf Huehne
On 08/22/2013 05:56 PM, Angel Herráez wrote: >> How important is it that we have a "stable" version of the applet that is >> different from the >> "development" version? > > Yes, see above. > What do others think? > I think it is very important. If you want to use it in a production environment s

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol hacks to jQuery removed

2013-08-22 Thread Robert Hanson
Sorry, working too fast. On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Angel Herráez wrote: > > Well, actually, "_dev" means we haven't released that version yet. So > the next will be without _dev > > -- 13.3.4 and 13.4.4. I made the mistake last release to increase the > number as well, so that's > > prob

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol hacks to jQuery removed

2013-08-22 Thread Angel Herráez
> Well, actually, "_dev" means we haven't released that version yet. So the > next will be without _dev > -- 13.3.4 and 13.4.4. I made the mistake last release to increase the number > as well, so that's > probably what is throwing you off. OK > 13.3 is the "stable" version. > 13.4 is the "de

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol hacks to jQuery removed

2013-08-22 Thread Robert Hanson
Well, actually, "_dev" means we haven't released that version yet. So the next will be without _dev -- 13.3.4 and 13.4.4. I made the mistake last release to increase the number as well, so that's probably what is throwing you off. 13.3 is the "stable" version. 13.4 is the "development version. Wi

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol hacks to jQuery removed

2013-08-22 Thread Angel Herráez
> 13.3.4, I think. But what I'm not distinguishing between 13.3 and 13.4 for > JSmol/HTML5, only the > Java versions. Well, if this is introduced in some 13.3.4_dev, I think the description to be safe should say the next subversion.Otherwise, somone with an older 13.3.4 may xpect it to work. T

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol hacks to jQuery removed

2013-08-21 Thread Robert Hanson
13.3.4, I think. But what I'm not distinguishing between 13.3 and 13.4 for JSmol/HTML5, only the Java versions. It's important to note that one needs to use jsmol.min.nojq.js if one wants to use one's own version of jQuery. On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Angel Herráez wrote: > Hi Bob :) >

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >