I get
hda: packet command error: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hda: packet command error: error=0x50
today, on a non-LEAF box I'm playing with. Curiously hda is a CD-ROM - I
get it any time I try to mount /dev/hda and there's no CD inserted. For
a h/d, IIRC it comes up only
Bad floppy drive/disks can give said effects. My drive/disk is currently
in that transient-problem state itself (I'm fairly certain it's the
drive, not the disk).
scott; canada
ALParada wrote:
Hello,
I had a problem with Leaf yesterday that surprised me a little bit. Last
--
LCD displays have been used on a few LEAF boxes so I'm trying to pick
any experienced or knowledgeable brains.
A customer of mine has need for a 1/2-height-5.25"-bay mountable LCD
display, say 2x16 line (sorry, not for a LEAF box but another
'appliance' animal).
What I've been having difficult
I think you want to be notified, audibly, once the entire system has
booted up, shorewall is loaded, etc, etc.
Me too.
I tucked in a call to my script in /etc/init.d/cron, just because it's
nearly the last thing to boot up ('S89').
Quick & dirty hack that worked for me.
scott; canada
Troy Aden
I'm getting the same thing.
FWIW the ISO image is coming in OK, but I've tried 3 or 4 of the
different mirrors (for the 1860-exe) and they're all failing (I tried
both with my usual Moz and with IE).
E.g.:
The mirror you've selected, telia.dl.sourceforge.net does not
currently have the file you re
About your 'strongest' comment...
This is by no means far-fetched, IMO. We're all probably more accustomed
to hardware being either working or non-working and are infrequently
confronted with a situation of degradation or 'dying' gear.
A story from my past:
I was working in telecom - PC-based
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
Thinking about this some more, I'm beginning to suspect the DSL line.
If I may, would this possibility not have been obviated when Dale
connected a Win98 box to the line and had no loss in pings?
But taking that bad-copper theory further I'll make mention of the value
Hi folks, thought that I would toss out a few RFE's to see if I can
encourage their inclusion. I'd be very happy to spend some time to make
inclusion as easy as possible for the Bering Team, if any of these
changed are desired.
1) LRCFG is invoked from /root/.profile
The default installation
I hope that the 'powers that be' cast an eye on this because it might be
worthy of a change.
From the PPPoE package, in the file /etc/ppp/peers/dsl-provider, there
is a parameter labelled as follows:
# Set maxfail to 0 for unlimited connections attemps
maxfail 10
As indicated, the default packa
The easiest thing might be to ssh/telnet/serial-port-terminal into your
existing box and 'clipboard-copy' off the relevant settings.
Note that the editor (at least as I have it set - 'e3' mode, IIRC) does
auto-indenting so pasting things that are indented leads to
staircase-shaped indentation.
whose efforts I am truly grateful.
My usual sign-off for posts here: Thanks for LEAF!
scott; canada
Martin Hejl wrote:
freeman groups wrote:
Then...
Changes between 2.2.0_rc1 and 2.2.0
weblet
* splitted weblet contents and sh-http server
which seems to have ended up with a couple of minor bust
Hi folks, first let me say that I love LEAF and really appreciate all
the time and effort that is made by people to produce formal releases,
etc. But I'd like to share my slight disquiet, if I may.
I've been working through the most recent beta releases of uClibc 2.2,
awaiting the final release
Prefix:
Well, I'm sure glad I searched the maillist further (looking into my
hunch of MTU/MRU issues), my problem was solved with the CLAMPMSS=yes
setting in shorewall's 'Config' file.
So the rest of this email is perhaps only of use to anyone who stumbles
down my well-worn path, except for
For SSH & ttyS0 I can achieve this but I cannot figure out how to have
my VGA monitor console on my Bering uClibc box give me 50 line display,
akin to the DOS command "mode con lines=50 cols=80"
I've tried adding each of the following to isolinux.cfg (even separately
testing with syslinux.cfg)
ing...
Blacklisting enabled on ppp0
Blacklisting enabled on eth0
Setting up Kernel Route Filtering...
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Personally, I have a sneaking suspicion that it /might/ have something
to do with the new 'dash' that is the shell on 2.2b5, but that's just a
(long) shot, in t
Playing around with 2.2b5 I gave it my usual setup which includes having
two interfaces flagged as blacklist-respecting (via
/etc/shorewall/interfaces) even though I don't have any entries in the
blacklist file.
Thus, upon shorewall's startup it gives this error message (middle line):
Adding Co
This is what I have in my /etc/profile. It gives a shell prompt akin to:
#
It also updates whenever I change to a new directory, in terms of
adjusting the prompt to indicate the new current directory that I am in.
Can ya tell, I'm an ole DOS hag ;)
--
unal
Luis.F.Correia wrote:
I have used a few versions of syslinux for DOS and found some
aggravation:
- Under Win98 pure-DOS boot (i.e. io.sys, msdos.sys, command.com
only) I can never recall having had syslinux c: (or even
syslinux -s c:)
work:
- I get an error: "Error 440D: Unable to lock d
[A belated re-sent to the list cuz I didn't adjust the reply-address]
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
There's even a version you can run from a dos command prompt (or from
dos window inside Windows).
I have used a few versions of syslinux for DOS and found some aggra
Erich Titl wrote:
Scott & List
I don't have an ip_ip.d nor an ip_down.d ... I am using the stock
PPP.LRP & PPPOE.LRP packages ... so maybe you're talking apples and
I'm eating oranges?
M... this is from Bering 1.2 ppp.lrp
tar tzf ppp.lrp
...
etc/ppp/ip-down.d/
etc/ppp/ip-up.d/
...
Oooops, my
Via BEEP.LRP my Bering 1.2 box makes lovely, helpful sounds (hint, hint
:) when the link goes up & down. This happens from within scripts
/etc/ppp/ip_up & /etc/ppp/ip-down so AFAICT you should be able to get
notification via these scripts.
I don't have an ip_ip.d nor an ip_down.d ... I am using
Sorry to KP for originally sending my reply only to him ... pesky
reply-to setting of this LEAF list :/(yes, I know...)
K.-P. Kirchdörfer wrote:
If you can edit leaf.cfg with a decent editor (not adding CR/LF) like notepad,
I was curious about this because my recollection was that notepad
K.-P. Kirchdörfer wrote:
You may try to compile it yourself - it isn't that hard to set up an uClibc
environment:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/mod.php?mod=userpage&menu=91018&page_id=52
kp
Thanks for the suggestion KP but this is way beyond my ability at this
time as I have two in-use Linux boxes
How about a super-sized RFE?
Basically, it might be a GoodThing to have some default banner for the
dropbear service which states that'unauthorized access is prohibited',
etc. This would, by default, provide some foundation upon which criminal
charges could be brought against someone attempting to
Via LRCFG one can edit the config file for dropbear,
/etc/default/dropbear. There's a parm within, as follows:
# optional banner to display before the user authenticates
DB_BANNER=""
However whenever I make it non-blank (followed with svi dropbear
restart) I cannot thereafter connect in via SSH.
This is a really handy 'toy' because it's used by the PPP package (at
least it was in Bering 1.2) and would give audible indicators of the
up/down activity of one's DSL link - and mine goes up & down sometimes :/
The Bering 1.2 package was originally found at:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/deve
(Really ... this is the last 'bug' that I'm aware of :)
In LEAF.CFG there are 3 memory size parms that can be adjusted:
syst_size
tmp_size (commented-out by default)
log_size
When I try to use the line:
tmp_size=3M
I get the following error message upon boot-up:
[...]
LINUXRC: Mounting
rther.
scott; canada
Luis.F.Correia wrote:
Hi!
-Original Message-
From: freeman groups [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 3:13 AM
To: LEAF
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] uClibc 2.2.0_b4 - Caution using
via-rhine - "kernel BUG at slab.c:1130!"/"In interrupt
h
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
Excludes override includes of the same specificity (this is a feature
of tar). You can read up on tar (google for man/info pages), and find
more details about the packaging system in the SF FAQ's:
[... Doing some reading ... thank you again Charles ... bookmarking the
oaded or run.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
As always, thanks for LEAF!
scott; canada
freeman groups wrote:
> Found this and figured it out so I thought that I'd share.
>
> This message comes up at bootup if one has 's in one's
> LEAF.CFG file. I.E. inste
Found this and figured it out so I thought that I'd share.
This message comes up at bootup if one has 's in one's LEAF.CFG
file. I.E. instead of the more proper only, as used in the Linux world.
You probably were editing your LEAF.CFG file in a DOS/Windows
environment and saved it.
Probably th
I have noticed that if a file is excluded by a package - say ROOT -
(e.g. root.exclude.list containing the line "var/lib/lrpkg/backdisk")
then I can't have that file included within a different package - CONFIG
- (e.g. having the line "var/lib/lrpkg/backdisk" within the file
config.list).
FWIW
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
The correct way to fix this is with an etc.local file:
Charles, without sounding like I'm endlessly contradictory might I
propose that this is, IMO, not the correct way to fix this?
The doc'n regarding partial backups:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/doc/guide/bubooting
ery few people go this route?
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Thanks for LEAF, folks!
scott; canada
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
freeman groups wrote:
I have a CD-ROM & f/d partial-backup setup happening. I was finding
that no matter the changes made to a config file and saving it
('p
I have a CD-ROM & f/d partial-backup setup happening. I was finding that
no matter the changes made to a config file and saving it ('partially')
to the floppy, when I rebooted I was met with the 'original'
cd-rom-stored settings.
My relevant leaf.cfg lines:
PKGPATH="/dev/cdrom:iso9660,/dev/f
I've been attempting to move to a cd-based setup and have been getting
into partial backups as a consequence. I've noticed some unexpected
behaviour (bugs?) and would like to bring my observations to the
attention of the Bering/uClibc team.
I began by wanting to do a partial backup of the etc p
e) not working sure confounded me, since I was pretty
darned fastidious about my IRQ assignments, given how full my slots are.
scott; canada
Original Message-
From: freeman groups [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 9:50 PM
To: LEAF
Subject: [leaf-user] uClibc 2.2.0_
My net card in question is a D-Link DFE-530TX Rev A1. I have been
placing the modules into the modules package (/lib/modules folder) and
backing up.
From the file Bering-uClibc_2.2.0_modules_2.4.26.tar.gz I had pulled
the files:
/net/pci-scan.o (7412 bytes) and /net/via-rhine.o (16428 byt
Following up on kp's suggestion that I clearly articulate what I think
could be improved regarding documenting the dependency of 8390.o upon
crc32.o...
Within the file /etc/modules of the modules.lrp package I would change
line 34 from:
# 8390 based ethernet cards
to
# 8390 based ethernet c
I just downloaded the rc4 flavour and separately, then collectively
extracted all the files so I can easily search through them on my Win box.
In doing do I observed that there are 2 files (same path & name) which
are stored both within shorwall.lrp and weblet.lrp...
shorwall.lrp:
Date
40 matches
Mail list logo
