Thanks, Mike.
Sherry
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Fry"
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2009 7:05:48 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sources
Sherry wrote:
> As I was following the discussion about usin
Sherry wrote:
As I was following the discussion about using Ancestry to facilitate
attaching sources to your family file in Legacy, I had some
questions.
I choose the individuals I want to upload to Ancestry and allow
Legacy to create the GEDCOM and upload. I do my research and attach
sources (e
As I was following the discussion about using Ancestry to facilitate attaching
sources to your family file in Legacy, I had some questions.
I choose the individuals I want to upload to Ancestry and allow Legacy to
create the GEDCOM and upload. I do my research and attach sources (easily as I
un
Thank you, Janis, and everyone who took time to reply. I very much appreciate
your kind assistance.
Tom
From: Janis L Gilmore
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Wed, October 14, 2009 5:42:12 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sources
Tom,
I understand
Message - From: Tom Thorpe
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: 14 October 2009 16:25
Subject: [LegacyUG] Sources
Good Morning All,
A Master Source question. Because I produce and attatch a digital
image of every source within Legacy, why would I need to cite any
other Master Source
of N.W. England
> http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
>
>
> - Original Message - From: Tom Thorpe
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Sent: 14 October 2009 16:25
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Sources
>
>
> Good Morning All,
>
> A Master Source question. Because I p
Tom,
I understand the question. If you have the document, why cite it?
Answer. Even if you have the document, you might sometime need to know where
it came from. You may see genealogy as a hobby, and don¹t feel worried about
professional standards but you might want to be aware that the work th
ure. I have recieved documents from 3
different relatives, in what seems similar to your concepts.
Rich in LA CA
- Original Message
From: Ron Ferguson
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 9:14:31 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sources
Tom,
Am I understandin
Hi Tom,
> Because I produce and attatch a digital image
> of every source within Legacy, why would I
> need to cite any other Master Source other than
> the "Personal Collections" one I have created?
Because the purpose of sources is to tell others (or remind yourself)
where you found that info
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
- Original Message -
From: Tom Thorpe
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: 14 October 2009 16:25
Subject: [LegacyUG] Sources
Good Morning All,
A Master Source question. Because I produce
Good Morning All,
A Master Source question. Because I produce and attatch a digital
image of every source within Legacy, why would I need to cite any other Master
Source other than the "Personal Collections" one I have created?
Example: from the NY State Archives, I obtained a copy of my ances
PM
Subject: [LegacyUG] sources
I discovered I have a fair number of people with no sources (from when I
entered them in FTM). Does anybody have an easy way to identify these
people, without my looking at each one?
Elizabeth C
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFami
I discovered I have a fair number of people with no sources (from when I
entered them in FTM). Does anybody have an easy way to identify these
people, without my looking at each one?
Elizabeth C
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived
Thanks, Brian. I've just updated & look forward to a good-looking set of end
notes. ;)
--Paula
--- On Fri, 7/10/09, Brian/Support wrote:
> The blank entries for excluded
> sources is a separate issue. In fact that
> problem has been solved and the fix will be included in the
> next update
>
us.
Thanks,
--Paula
--- On Thu, 7/9/09, Brian/Support wrote:
From: Brian/Support
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sources Not Printing On To-Do List/Research Log
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Date: Thursday, July 9, 2009, 10:50 AM
Connie,
This problem was reported earlier and a repor
Connie, What a great idea!
Thanks!
--Paula
--- On Thu, 7/9/09, Connie Sheets wrote:
> From: Connie Sheets
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sources Not Printing On To-Do List/Research Log
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Date: Thursday, July 9, 2009, 11:53 AM
>
>
Brian,
Is this related to/same as the blank source citations in end notes when the
master source is set to "exclude" ? Just curious.
Thanks,
--Paula
--- On Thu, 7/9/09, Brian/Support wrote:
> From: Brian/Support
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sources Not Printing On To-Do List/R
; FHL microfilm 986,171, item 8.
Results: 6/29/09: Partial transcription completed; found death date for Jesse
Hancock.
--- On Thu, 7/9/09, Brian/Support wrote:
> From: Brian/Support
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sources Not Printing On To-Do List/Research Log
> To: LegacyUserGroup@leg
Connie,
This problem was reported earlier and a report has been submitted to the
programmers but thank you for taking the time to report it as well. I
added the issue based on Jennifer's report but I must apologize to the
list since I guess I forgot to advise the LUG that the issue was recorde
I have not been able to keep up with reading the list the last couple of
months, so my apologies if this has been discussed recently. I checked the
archives and found only one reference:
Back in January, Jennifer Trahan asked for verification that others were
experiencing difficulty with Sour
ytree.com] On Behalf
Of Marilyn Streeter
Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 9:21 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Sources for Notes
I would like to enter a source for each piece of information I add into the
Notes section. I have found that if I add a piece of information
Marilyn Streeter wrote
I would like to enter a source for each piece of information I add into
the Notes section. I have found that if I add a piece of information
taken from a source and apply the source and then when I add another
piece of information from another source and apply the sourc
Cathy,
What an awesome solution! I'm going to go in and add that event now, before I
forget. ;)
Thanks for sharing.
--Paula in Texas
--- On Sun, 6/7/09, Cathy wrote:
From: Cathy
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sources for Notes
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Date: Sunday, J
I have an event called "Miscellaneous Notes" which I use. As I have
not associated any specific sentence structure with it and it
includes only notes and sources, it allows me to do just what you
suggest below in your email.
At 12:20 PM 6/7/2009 -0400, you wrote:
I would like to enter a s
Sources are associated with an item, such as the Notes block - not the
separate pieces of the text in the item. The only way to associate a
source and a date with a specific line in the Notes block is to add it
manually. Example:
Sarah Jones gave birth to both her children on the porch of her mo
I would like to enter a source for each piece of information I add into the
Notes section. I have found that if I add a piece of information taken
from a source and apply the source and then when I add another piece of
information from another source and apply the source to that piece of info,
it
Michael,
I have tried various things, but have found that my chosen method is to
break the census down by year, state and county. So my source list looks
like this (or could if I didn't have more sources for each state and
county):
Missouri, Howell - census 1910 (Ancestry)
Missouri, Howell - cens
8:40 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup
Subject: [LegacyUG] Sources
I would like to do things right. My question deals with the census. Do
I create a for each census and then just edit the source details for
each person, and how do you cite all the people on the same page like
the families?
Thanks
L
I would like to do things right. My question deals with the census. Do
I create a for each census and then just edit the source details for
each person, and how do you cite all the people on the same page like
the families?
Thanks
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTr
Good Point... Thank you
Lew
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:02 AM, Jenny M Benson wrote:
> Chick Lewis wrote
>>
>> You mentioned database program.. rang a bell. I have Microsoft Office
>> which does have Access. I changed the extension on my Legacy file to mdb.
>> (using a copy -- not my main file) I
Chick Lewis wrote
You mentioned database program.. rang a bell. I have Microsoft Office
which does have Access. I changed the extension on my Legacy file to
mdb. (using a copy -- not my main file) It works !!
It's not really important, but as it happens there is no need to change
the extens
or The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
> http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
> _
>
>
>
>
>
> --------
>> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:15:15 -0700
>> Subject:
yweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_
> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:15:15 -0700
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sources and Citations
> From: cglewi...@gmail.com
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
>
&g
ergys.co.uk/
> View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
> http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
> For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
> http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
> _
>
>
>> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:1
:41 -0700
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Sources and Citations
> From: cglewi...@gmail.com
> To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
>
> If I have several events all referenced to the same source, how can I
> tell whether there is actually multiple copies of the source in the
> datab
If I have several events all referenced to the same source, how can I
tell whether there is actually multiple copies of the source in the
database, or one copy that is linked to all the events. Am I correct
in assuming that there is only one copy of the source itself but each
citation is a "stand
Hi all:
Thanks for everyone's help yesterday.
If I use the Basic source system and almost always print citations and
bibliographies:
1) How do I input the author's name so that it shows up "Given Last" in the
footnote and "Last, Given" in the bibliography?
If that is not possible with the
Thanks, I was afraid of that.
Syble
--- On Tue, 3/3/09, Jenny M Benson wrote:
From: Jenny M Benson
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sources: Basic Style and Template Style
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
Date: Tuesday, March 3, 2009, 12:03 AM
Syble Glasscock wrote
> I have a problem wit
BUT, make the other 'flavor' using cut and paste-ing. Then when you have
finished it, only then delete the old one.
Rich in LA CA
--- On Mon, 3/2/09, Jenny M Benson wrote:
> From: Jenny M Benson
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sources: Basic Style and Template Style
>
Syble Glasscock wrote
I have a problem with a couple of sources. I know everyone seems to do
something different, but I have all my census, just listed as Census
under Events, then as I source them, I have 1900 U.S.census, 1910, 1920
etc. and on the "Text/Comments" I put all the information fro
I have a problem with a couple of sources. I know everyone seems to do
something different, but I have all my census, just listed as Census under
Events, then as I source them, I have 1900 U.S.census, 1910, 1920 etc. and on
the "Text/Comments" I put all the information from the particular census
wrote
In trying to edit and clean up my "Sources" I see something called
"basic" and some other three digit numbers in the Master Source List
- Template ID. What does it mean?
Basic means "old style" Sources that were created before we had
SourceWriter or where you chose to use the Basic
In trying to edit and clean up my "Sources" I see something called "basic"
and some other three digit numbers in the Master Source List - Template ID.
What does it mean?
**Nothing says I love you like flowers! Find a florist near you
now. (http://yellowpages.aol.com/search?qu
f N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_
> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 17:34:15 -0500
> From: genealo...@verizon.net
> Subject: [LegacyUG] Sources
> To: LegacyUserGroup@leg
I like using Legacy, I have been using Family Tree Maker in the past but I
really like some of the features here. But I would like to know if there is
a way to import sources from Ancestry into Legacy 7 like there is with
family tree?
I thank you all for your support
Michael
Legacy Us
support.
- Original Message
From: Elizabeth Richardson
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 7:33:58 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sources not printing on To-Do Lists
I'm not using the To Do Lists right, I guess. One of my To Dos, for example,
re doing, I would be frustrated too!
Elizabeth
researching the descendants of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson
- Original Message -
From: "Jennifer Trahan"
To:
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 4:07 PM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Sources not printing on To-Do Lists
I'm a
I'm about to explode. If I find that one other thing has been taken away since
upgrading to the latest 7.0 version I tried to print a To-Do list for an
individual, and numerical references to the footnotes appear in the text of the
report, but at the end of the report, there are no source ci
Ron Goodwin wrote
I would like to keep all these different sources together so I thinking
that I could have a number of titles such as ?Land Deeds ? Lincoln,
Kansas?, ?Land Deeds ? Red Deer, Alberta? and ?Land Deeds ? Calgary
Alberta?, etc.. I would then like to record, and copy a number of
di
I have copies of deeds from the purchase and sale of different properties
and I would like to set up a Master Source to enter them
My question is; I have deeds from a number of different locations, farm land
in Kansas and Alberta plus city properties from different areas, plus deeds
under a number
ing the descendants of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson
>
> - Original Message - From: "ronald ferguson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 12:04 PM
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] sources attaching to every event
>
>
>
>
- Original Message -
From: "ronald ferguson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 12:04 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] sources attaching to every event
Elizabeth,
Easy, it will pick up the last one used and edit the deta
e at:
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] sources attac
://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] sources attaching to every eve
gland See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_
> Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 15:20:56 -0400
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] sources attaching to every event
>
> Ron,
How can you edit the source detail if you have no source? I mean, why do you
even have detail for a non-existent source?
Elizabeth
researching the descendants of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson
- Original Message -
From: "GeoSci"
You said: "I have found a way of creating the
Ron,
You said: "I have found a way of creating the error but it seems
unlikely that you are doing this, and that is by just clicking on Edit
Detail without citing a Master Source or adding a new one." Now you
have me worried. If I am adding an EVENT - say WW aft Registration -
to several peop
49 AM
To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] sources attaching to every event
Janis,
You say "I copy it to the clipboard for usage until I am through with that
particular source." How are you doing this - do you use the blue arrow on
the Assigned Sources Screen or do you j
/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] sources attaching to every event
> Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 07
instance of it since yesterday morning.
Janis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ronald
ferguson
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 11:13 PM
To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] sources attaching to every event
]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] sources attaching to every event
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 08:29:56 -0700
I have just discovered another individual with a mistaken source attached to
every event. This is definitely not an instance of hitting the triple bar
I have just discovered another individual with a mistaken source attached to
every event. This is definitely not an instance of hitting the triple bar
instead of the single. The source attached is from an entirely unrelated
line; it is a new Source Writer source, which I created just yesterday
mor
That fixed it! I had not (didn't know that I needed to) ticked to "show
relationships" in the report options. I knew it had to be something simple
that I had just missed. This group is great. Thanks a million.
La Nell
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Sources for Father/Mother relatio
ronald ferguson wrote
I've never sourced Relationships before, but I have just done so to test
it out and can confirm that it did not show up on the Citations for the
Family Group Sheet. It did show up on a Descendant Book Report.
--
Jenny M Benson
In which case, Jenny, it would seem to be de
://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:30:21 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sources for Father/Mother relationship?
If
: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:11:12 +0100
> > To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sources for Father/Mother relationship?
> >
> >
> > ronald ferguson wrote
> >>I don't source relationships so I canno
> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:11:12 +0100
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sources for Father/Mother relationship?
>
>
> ronald ferguson wrote
>>I don't source relationships so I cannot comment on whethe
La Nell,
I may have missed something here but I do not get a problem. My
source is entered under the events Father Rel.: and Mother Rel.: in my
Assigned Sources. In the Family Group Report options I check the
Child-parent relationships to be included. The resultant report shows ,
in the Fat
ronald ferguson wrote
I don't source relationships so I cannot comment on whether your
observation is specific to your set-up or more general. However, I do
agree that a souce for names and a source for lineage could be totally
different and if sourced as such then all sources should be shown.
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of La Nell
Shores
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 7:11 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Sources for Father/Mother relationship?
Ok, here goes. I am creating Family Group Reports and where the mother and
ngland See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Sources for Father/Mother relationship?
Date: Wed, 23 Jul
No, you are not 'crazy'. The source used for the parent - child relation has
not been correct for several versions (not just updates/fixes). I've noted the
problem and commented a couple of years ago.
Best,
Denise L. Moss-Fritch
-- Original message --
From: "La Ne
Ok, here goes. I am creating Family Group Reports and where the mother and
father's names are listed, the source that is showing is the source I have
entered for their particular name on their own individual source screen.
I have used another source for the relationship and that is not showi
I wanted to say thank you to those at Legacy that were smart enough to make
it where the new sources done using the Source Writer show up on the list as
bulleted. I am adding sources one at a time and they have the same name as
my old sources. I can see which are the new entries vs. the old en
As I understand it OP = Original or Originating Poster
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sources -
> Master and Detail> Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 13:43:10 -0400> From: [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> > Intermittently on this LUG I see references to &q
Original Poster (or person)
It is a reference to the person who started a particular topic or question.
If you ever want to know what an anacronym is, there are a lot of resources on
the Internet to look them up. Here is one http://www.gaarde.org/acronyms/
Gary Templeman
-- Origina
ny M Benson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2008 7:20 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sources - Master and Detail
Elizabeth Richardson wrote
What do you have checked in Options>Customize>Sources>Source
Detail Defaults ?
Another rather confusing instance of hav
The quickest way to recover from something like this is to restore your backup.
If you don't have one from when you started doing this sourcing, then
this is a reminder to make more frequent backups, especially when
trying new features.
The slower way if you don't have a backup is to show list
rogram? OutPut?
- Original Message - From: "Jenny M Benson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2008 7:20 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sources - Master and Detail
Elizabeth Richardson wrote
What do you have checked in Options>Customize>Sources>Source Detai
Robert57P via Gmail wrote:
Intermittently on this LUG I see references to "OP". What's that stand
for? Operator? Operating Program? OutPut?
Original Poster, the person who started a particular thread.
--
Gene Y.
n2kvs
Researching Young, Zies, Harer & Cox with
Legacy Family Tree
http://h1.
y, June 08, 2008 8:37 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sources
I hope someone will come up with an easy fix, but if not then the best
option (before any more data entry or changes) is to restore from the most
recent backup.
Gary
Intermittently on this LUG I see references to "OP". What's that stand for?
Operator? Operating Program? OutPut?
- Original Message -
From: "Jenny M Benson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2008 7:20 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sources -
---
From: "Carol Costa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2008 2:18 PM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Sources
> Something weird has happened when I try to cite a source. As I was
> inputing
> a Master Source for a birth index this morning, I think I indadvertently
For Source Detail Defaults, I have everything checked except "Source is
verified"
Elizabeth Richardson wrote:
What do you have checked in Options>Customize>Sources>Source Detail
Defaults ?
Elizabeth
researching the descendants of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson
- Original Message
07, 2008 1:18 PM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Sources
Something weird has happened when I try to cite a source. As I was
inputing
a Master Source for a birth index this morning, I think I indadvertently
touched the Combine Highlighted Source with Another in the List. (don't
ask
me how that happen
Elizabeth Richardson wrote
What do you have checked in Options>Customize>Sources>Source Detail
Defaults ?
Another rather confusing instance of having different places to select
the same options! However, I have "Include Source Details text on
source citations on reports" ticked in Options a
Something weird has happened when I try to cite a source. As I was inputing
a Master Source for a birth index this morning, I think I indadvertently
touched the Combine Highlighted Source with Another in the List. (don't ask
me how that happened) Now this person's source information for the birth
Markie Flint Blackmon wrote
When I run a Family Group Report that includes source citations with
the same Master Source but totally different details, the source
citations at the end of the report are treated as if they are the same;
i.e. the truncated "subsequent citation" format is used, and
g the descendants of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson
- Original Message -
From: "Jenny M Benson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2008 12:15 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sources - Master and Detail
Markie Flint Blackmon wrote
When I run a Fam
What do you have checked in Options>Customize>Sources>Source Detail Defaults
?
Elizabeth
researching the descendants of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson
- Original Message -
From: Markie Flint Blackmon
I've made one Master Source for the 1850 Carroll County Ohio census and
mu
ECTED]
www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markie
Flint Blackmon
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 4:21 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Sources - Master and Detail
I've always been a "splitter" until now,
I've always been a "splitter" until now, but with the new V7 Source
Writer, I've been manually converting my sources, specifically census.
I've made one Master Source for the 1850 Carroll County Ohio census and
multiple source details for numerous families scattered about in
different towns in
Ana,
Thank you very much for your suggestions. While I couldn't find the records
in the Search area, both of your suggestions worked great and allowed me to
access the records.
I had never used the clicking on the RIN numbers in the lower right side,
this makes things much easier.
Thank you
Jay
Hi -
MRIN - stands for Marriage + RIN number, RIN being the computer /
database identification number. Marriage Record number is also the RIN
number.
Backup your file.
Here are two ways to work on this error:
(1) along the bottom of the family screen - are three boxes: HRIN
(husband rin nu
I have been going through my Master sources to try to clean up a few of the
duplicated items to make the transition to the Legacy 7 source writer a more
manageable task.
I have a few sources that are causing me problems however. When I select a
problem causing source and go to the show list button
GeoSci wrote
My question - is there a way to prevent an event (perhaps a check box
that I have missed) from showing up on reports - especially the
narrative type reports? What I would like to do is SLOWLY add the
Residence, etc. to the EVENTS - but leave the CENSUS -- just have them
NOT print
Tried the Residence, Occupation, etc. ideas on a few people and prefer
the resulting reports - people seem more human - more like living
things than just an encyclopedic explanation of someone's life. That
said - I have over 3000 persons with Census -US (depending on
year) already entered as
Meticulous? You must never have seen my desk
Janis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Elizabeth
Richardson
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 12:12 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sources and the elusive
Janis, what difference does it make how he's indexed if you record such
meticulous records of where he can be found on the actual census?
Elizabeth
researching the descendants of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson
From: "Janis Gilmore"
I, too, keep track of these instances of indexing in
L PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Penny
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 11:56 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sources and the elusive version 7 again.
Janis,
I personally agree with there being no need to reference where I saw a
census image. That being said, I do remar
1 - 100 of 318 matches
Mail list logo
