Hi,
I know this is late notice (as always; will I ever learn?), but does
anyone have any crashspace available for thursday and/or friday?
Thanks in advance,
Jody
Elaine -HFB- Ashton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] quoth:
*
*CwG: Right, you have seven days to produce your ID card at any police
*station -- here's the appropriate bit of paper to bring along with it.
*Me: Right ho. Have a nice day.
I don't know that you could
On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 21:11, Tom Hukins wrote;
Also, I suspect the case for bzip2 becomes stronger in the future.
Assume Moore's Law continues to hold for CPU speed increase. Disk
and
This argument is irrelevant in general, because the size of files to
be compressed in general also
Je 2003-08-29 07:11:42 +0100, Paul Sharpe skribis:
Paul Makepeace wrote:
Basic hour-by-hour, daily, weekly, monthly, yearly views. Something that
produces HTML output for inclusion or direct embeddable on the web would
I like Mozilla calendar:
* RFC2445
* Multiple calendars which
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Paul Makepeace wrote:
The only challenge was /running/ the damn thing. I have no idea how to
launch it from Firebird. It's possible to launch FB from it by clicking
on the M logo but the selected profile is ignored (at least bookmarks
didn't show up). Anyone?
Yep, install
On Tue, 02 Sep 2003 01:17, Paul Makepeace wrote;
The only challenge was /running/ the damn thing. I have no idea
how to launch it from Firebird. It's possible to launch FB from it
by clicking on the M logo but the selected profile is ignored (at
least bookmarks didn't show up).
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 01:35:46AM +0100, Jody Belka wrote:
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Paul Makepeace wrote:
The only challenge was /running/ the damn thing. I have no idea how to
launch it from Firebird. It's possible to launch FB from it by clicking
on the M logo but the selected profile is
Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] quoth:
*
* I don't know that you could get away with that in the US as they'd track
* down the owner of the car after 7 days
*
*What car are you talking about? There is no car.
Perhaps you forgot in this long pointless thread, that you started picking
on drivers
Mike Jarvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which is one of my big fears with Firebird becoming Browser (that
is, the only mozilla browser). the guys running it are still wedded
to the idea of pushing everything into extensions. Last I saw they
still weren't going to add a menu item to switch style
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used to be annoyed when someone zipped and the rared. Winzip cannot even
handle this yet. Nowadays I can just say that RAR is more universial the
Zip.
That seem unlikely at best. I'd never even heard of winrar until
somebody at work pointed it out
On 1 Sep 2003 at 21:58, Tim Sweetman wrote:
Does all this negotiation run into hot water with legacy p(r)oxy caches?
I believe someone mentioned that they couldn't get their cache to cache
the contents if they sent the proper HTTP header (Vary: encoding, I
believe, meaning Hey, proxy, the
Philip Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1 Sep 2003 at 21:58, Tim Sweetman wrote:
Does all this negotiation run into hot water with legacy p(r)oxy caches?
I believe someone mentioned that they couldn't get their cache to cache
the contents if they sent the proper HTTP header (Vary:
On 2 Sep 2003 at 7:16, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
It's certainly not what I'd call anywhere close to being standard or
universal.
I'm told it's fairly popular in (some?) Usenet binary newsgroups as a
standard way of distributing warez and moviez.
From what I gather, it supports multi-volume
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Philip Newton wrote:
On 2 Sep 2003 at 7:16, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
It's certainly not what I'd call anywhere close to being standard or
universal.
I'm told it's fairly popular in (some?) Usenet binary newsgroups as a
standard way of distributing warez and moviez.
http://grou.ch/bounce.txt is very effective. But if you're using
fetchmail or similar, remember the Email::Simple team chose correctness
over usefulness, and not to write the emails back to mail folders,
unless you want all kinds of pain.
+Pete
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 01:13:56AM +0100, Sam Vilain wrote:
On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 21:11, Tom Hukins wrote;
Also, I suspect the case for bzip2 becomes stronger in the future.
Assume Moore's Law continues to hold for CPU speed increase. Disk
and
This argument is irrelevant in
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, the hatter wrote:
It's certainly not what I'd call anywhere close to being standard or
universal.
I'm told it's fairly popular in (some?) Usenet binary newsgroups as a
standard way of distributing warez and moviez.
Certainly a majority of warez that show up on
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 09:27:34AM +0100, Peter Sergeant wrote:
http://grou.ch/bounce.txt is very effective. But if you're using
fetchmail or similar, remember the Email::Simple team chose correctness
over usefulness,
I typically find correct things very useful. For the cases where not,
we
* Dave Cross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030901 23:08]:
I hacked up something that identified the emails I want to filter
using Email::Simple, but I'd appreciate some input on what I've
done. There are three areas I need help on.
The first problem is identifying why the email ended up in my
inbox.
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 02:09:58PM -0700, Dave Cross wrote:
I'm using the Email::* modules but there doesn't seem to be a
way to extract the actual deliverable email address from the
headers. For example, from
Dave Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snip]
Email parsing is listed as for a future
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 09:24:11AM +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
[re RAR]
I'm told it's fairly popular in (some?) Usenet binary newsgroups as a
standard way of distributing warez and moviez.
ACE is another format that I understand is used in that context.
From what I gather, it supports
Dave Cross wrote:
What would be really good would be if we could autodetect which
modules they had installed during installation and choose the
local default from those - but I may leve that for a later release.
Have a look at XML::SAX. It maintains a list of SAX parsers installed on
the
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Roger Burton West wrote:
Both correct, though I've never seen PAR actually produce a result.
Download a large enough set of rar component files (as in grabbing Buffy
each week) and you'll soon find how useful par files are.
Jason Clifford
--
UKFSN.ORG
Roger Burton West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my experience, people who really care about compressed file size and
are moderately technically savvy tend to use RAR or ACE; people who
want their files to be readable by everybody use ZIP; people who are
catering for virus-prone fools use
On Tuesday, September 2, 2003, 6:27:04 AM, Mike Jarvis wrote:
MJ I like the idea of a slim, quick browser, but I think they may be
MJ getting too religious about it.
If you ever use That OS (even if it's just at work with an enforced NT
workstation or something), I can heartily recommend
On 2 Sep 2003 at 9:43, Roger Burton West wrote:
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 09:24:11AM +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
When I started computing in the 90's on PCs, it was LZH at the
beginning, replaced by ARJ shortly after I started; now it's ZIP. (And,
of course, the perennial .tar.Z / .tar.gz
From: Mark Overmeer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 9/2/03 8:36:11 AM
You can be in the Bcc of the sender, so valid mail does
not require to have contain your address.
Yeah, but in cases like that one of my email addresses will still
be in the Received headers somewhere. I think.
Dave...
--
Dave Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Mark Overmeer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 9/2/03 8:36:11 AM
You can be in the Bcc of the sender, so valid mail does
not require to have contain your address.
Yeah, but in cases like that one of my email addresses will still
be in the Received
Je 2003-09-02 09:54:59 +0100, Dave Cross skribis:
From: Mark Overmeer [EMAIL PROTECTED]9/2/03 8:36:11 AM
You can be in the Bcc of the sender, so valid mail does
not require to have contain your address.
Yeah, but in cases like that one of my email addresses will still
be in the Received
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 07:00:20AM +, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
Mike Jarvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which is one of my big fears with Firebird becoming Browser (that
is, the only mozilla browser). the guys running it are still wedded
to the idea of pushing everything into extensions.
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 10:55:13AM +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
I can well imagine that the availability of Info-ZIP may have been part
of this; another part is probably the advent of Win95 and WinZIP, which
brought compression to the pointy-clicky masses. (ARJ and PKZIP had
both been 16-bit
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Cross
Sent: 01 September 2003 22:10
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Programming Email Filters
Like (I guess) many people round here I'm getting Too Much
Email that I don't want to read. So
Dave Cross sent the following bits through the ether:
I've done something similar before with Symbol::Approx::Sub,
but I'm not sure that the interface I designed there was as useful
as it could be, so I'm open to suggestions.
No, I wasn't terribly happy with it either. I've written this bit
Dominic Mitchell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Dave Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Mark Overmeer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 9/2/03 8:36:11 AM
You can be in the Bcc of the sender, so valid mail does
not require to have contain your address.
Yeah, but in cases like that one of
On 2 Sep 2003 at 10:09, Roger Burton West wrote:
I still have copies of most of the archivers and compressors I was
playing with in those days... anyone remember UC2? HA? SAR? ACB?
I had a bunch squirrelled away on my old hard drive (125 MB, the
luxury). I should have that backed up on CD-R
Mike Jarvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 07:00:20AM +, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
The nightlies of FireBird have a stylesheet switcher icon in the bottom
left. No extensions needed. I presume that this will find its way
into the next version.
It does have the icon,
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Leon Brocard wrote:
So, I don't know, but good luck. I'm sure there's a good module or two
in there somewhere (a la, return a list of modules which have the same
base name as 'Foo::Plugin::'...
That's not going to work. Quite a few of my plugins have support modules
that
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Simon Wistow wrote:
http://siesta.unixbeard.net/svn/trunk/siesta/lib/Siesta.pm
under available_plugins
1) Does that code work on platforms that don't use '/' as a directory
seperator? Ooh, maybe I should patch that.
2) That code probably will go boom if you try to use it
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 12:31:03PM +0100, Mark Fowler wrote:
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Simon Wistow wrote:
http://siesta.unixbeard.net/svn/trunk/siesta/lib/Siesta.pm
under available_plugins
1) Does that code work on platforms that don't use '/' as a directory
seperator? Ooh, maybe I should
[Well, it's written in perl, so what the hell]
I've sort of finished stage one of my Email RSS Aggregator:
http://era.indecorous.com/
At least, it's ready for some more general testing. So, if anyone's got
some spare moments and fancies giving it a whirl (particularly if it
sounds
Hmm, so there's a Debian package mencal -- that's menstrual calendar
-- which prints calendars like cal(1) but with certain days in ... red.
Yes, it's written in perl.
And why not,
Paul
--
Paul Makepeace ... http://paulm.com/
What is quids in in German?
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 09:19:37AM -0400, Chris Devers wrote:
JAR? No relation to the Java archive format, is there?
None whatsoever - it predated it somewhat as well.
I thought that Java's JAR files were just Java-tARballs.
Mostly they're Zip-files, actually..
Roger
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Philip Newton wrote:
No idea what ARJ is doing these days. They still seem to be around
as a company (and have a better format called JAR, apparently) [...]
JAR? No relation to the Java archive format, is there?
I thought that Java's JAR files were just Java-tARballs.
Now
On 2 Sep 2003 at 9:19, Chris Devers wrote:
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Philip Newton wrote:
No idea what ARJ is doing these days. They still seem to be around
as a company (and have a better format called JAR, apparently) [...]
JAR? No relation to the Java archive format, is there?
Correct: no
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 14:09:58 -0700, Dave Cross wrote:
The first problem is identifying why the email ended up in my inbox. I
need to work out which of the many email addresses in the many headers is
aimed at me. Here's the algorithm I'm using.
1/ If there's an 'Envelope-to' header then use
Can someone remind me, what's the header voodoo that tells a browser
that regardless of what it sent in the GET request, it should offer to
save the file as $filename?
--
Lord Protector David Cantrell | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david
Longum iter est per praecepta, breve et efficax per
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 02:41:39PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
Can someone remind me, what's the header voodoo that tells a browser
that regardless of what it sent in the GET request, it should offer to
save the file as $filename?
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=$filename
works
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 02:41:39PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
Can someone remind me, what's the header voodoo that tells a browser
that regardless of what it sent in the GET request, it should offer to
save the file as $filename?
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=$filename
Roger
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 01:17:05AM +0100, Paul Makepeace wrote:
My solution: firebird -calendar and then use a different profile (I
created a Calendar profile).
Hmm, I just tried this and I decided to download the UK Holidays
from the same page. Can anyone tell my why it has New Year's Day on
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 08:43:52AM +0100, Leo Lapworth wrote:
Well the deed is done - I'm now a married man :)
Congratulations!
http://leo.cuckoo.org/cgi-bin/yapi/yapi.cgi/Wedding/030_wedding/0080_Leon.JPG
= What, not an orange suit? Not even an orange shirt? Or Tie?
Tsk, standards...
Marcel
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 02:47:09PM +0100, Chris Andrews wrote:
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=$filename
works for me.
Works for me too. Cheers.
--
David Cantrell | Reality Engineer, Ministry of Information
Longum iter est per praecepta, breve et efficax per exempla.
--
Sam Vilain wrote:
/me considers getting all his amalgam fillings changed to composite...
Paul Makepeace wrote:
The danger is vaporizing the mercury as the drill goes in - which makes
it several orders of magnitude easier to penetrate gum cell walls. You
can end up getting dosed more in
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 05:50:00PM +0100, Adrian Howard wrote:
Tell me about it, just cleared eight of those out of the list's admin
queue.
426 since Friday 5pm.
That's just the anti-virus bounces. I've given up counting the fardling
virus posts.
Something around 5000 here, and that's
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 10:09:16AM +0100, Roger Burton West wrote:
JAR was available in 1996 or so, I think. I still have copies of most of
the archivers and compressors I was playing with in those days... anyone
remember UC2? HA? SAR? ACB?
I remember (and used) UC2 and, I think, HA..
What
On or about Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 08:02:10AM -0700, Toby Corkindale typed:
I remember (and used) UC2 and, I think, HA..
Want a Debian package for HA? (Privately maintained while I wait to have
time to do the become-a-developer dance.)
What happened to UC2?
I think the company went under. They
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Steve Keay wrote:
Hmm, I just tried this and I decided to download the UK Holidays
from the same page. Can anyone tell my why it has New Year's Day on
the 1st of December?
I also find it a little worrying that Christmas, etc are not
re-occurring events. I like to speed
On Tue, 02 Sep 2003 15:48, Philip Hellyer wrote;
To my knowledge, there is no filling that requires mercury
amalgam, although I have heard that many dentists say that they
do. I think that these statements stem from a lack of ability on
the part of the dentist, or a lack of
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 03:48:06PM +0100, Philip Hellyer wrote:
My s.o. also took 10 grams of intravenous vitamin C during
the procedure.
Isn't that above the level where vitamin C will crystalise out of urine
and potentially cause damage to the urethra?
I mean, the RDA for vitamin C is
Je 2003-09-02 18:01:12 +0100, Ben skribis:
I mean, the RDA for vitamin C is only, what, 60 milligrams?
That's right -- at the same time there's plenty of dissention about
whether that's enough, and in what circumstances. Dousing your
bloodstream in anti-oxidants (C, E, polyphenols, etc) during
Paul Makepeace wrote:
Je 2003-09-02 18:01:12 +0100, Ben skribis:
I mean, the RDA for vitamin C is only, what, 60 milligrams?
That's right -- at the same time there's plenty of dissention about
whether that's enough, and in what circumstances. Dousing your
bloodstream in anti-oxidants (C,
On Tue, 02 Sep 2003 14:25, Roger Burton West wrote;
I thought that Java's JAR files were just Java-tARballs.
Mostly they're Zip-files, actually..
Which makes sense, because .ZIP is a file format with an index at the
end designed for random access, whereas .tar files need to be scanned
to
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Sam Vilain wrote:
On Tue, 02 Sep 2003 14:25, Roger Burton West wrote;
I thought that Java's JAR files were just Java-tARballs.
Mostly they're Zip-files, actually..
Which makes sense, because .ZIP is a file format with an index at the
end designed for random
On 02 September 2003 09:53 Jason Clifford wrote:
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Roger Burton West wrote:
Both correct, though I've never seen PAR actually produce a result.
Download a large enough set of rar component files (as in grabbing
Buffy each week) and you'll soon find how useful par files
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 07:16:40AM +, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
For the benefit of people likely to come up against Yet Another
Compression Format, though:
http://files10.rarlab.com/rar/unrarsrc-3.2.3.tar.gz
The code in there is a lot cleaner than the last time I looked at
it. (I
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 06:19:05PM +0100, Paul Makepeace wrote:
Je 2003-09-02 18:01:12 +0100, Ben skribis:
I mean, the RDA for vitamin C is only, what, 60 milligrams?
Right. That's the amount determined to stave off scurvy[1]. The RDA
doesn't say anything about if you should have more, or
Adam Turoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] quoth:
*
*Actually, contraindications with large (oral?) doses of vitamin C involve
*something called bowel tolerance. Don't know where pissing shards is
*on the spectrum. :-)
Well, Vitamin C does make a reliable abortifacient for women who are very
early in their
Roger Burton West wrote:
JAR was available in 1996 or so, I think. I still have copies of most of
the archivers and compressors I was playing with in those days... anyone
remember UC2? HA? SAR? ACB?
Not really.
I come from a DOS background, where in the late '80s we started out with
.arc and
Well, Vitamin C does make a reliable abortifacient for women who are very
early in their pregnancy since it blocks the uptake of progesterone. It's
usually taken orally in very high doses and often combined with other
herbal substances to help the process when it's a desired effect.
Such as
On Tue, 02 Sep 2003 22:30, Adam Turoff wrote;
Right. That's the amount determined to stave off scurvy[1]. The
RDA doesn't say anything about if you should have more, or the
benefits of having more vitamin C in your diet.
Linus Pauling had some pretty strong opinions on this --
69 matches
Mail list logo
