On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 02:53:08PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> r13704 - EF - Account for Cygwin teTeX on Windows
>
> I'd say no.
So it is broken and will stay broken? It is not that important, after
all this simply avoids an empty "TeX Information", but I am really
annoyed that
Bo Peng a écrit :
text3.C:360:2: warning: #warning The code below only makes sense at top
level.
text3.C:714:2: warning: #warning look here
if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -Winvalid-pch --include=./pch.h
-I../boost -Wextra -Wall-I/usr/X11R6/include -g -O -MT version.o
-MD -MP -MF
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Abdel> - Bo's session management
>> >
>> > I am not sure about this one, since it seems that all problems
>> have > not been solved yet, and making a complete patch for 1.4
>> will probably > be too difficult.
Bo> Please specify which ones
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 02:54:49PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Martin> wrote:
>> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Martin> 1) Why is this behaviour wrong? If 'cursor follows scrollbar'
Martin> is
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This patch closes the improvements I had in mind concerning
> installers. It allows packagers to provide a file lyxrc.dist that will
> be read (if it exists) before all the others.
> Comments? Is it enough to simplify packagers' job?
I think it
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Philippe" == Philippe Charpentier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Philippe> After some tests, I found the following (for the qt
Philippe> frontend): in a terminal if I type: export LANG=fr_FR (or
Philippe> whatever different of en_...) export
Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> With my patch, the viewers, formats are most of the time
> non-informative under windows. (We even lose prettyname). That is why
> I suggest hiding the panel (at a cost of not able to specify viewer.)
> Now, we agreed to have
> \format ps postscript "" "" ""
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:03:23PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Paolo" == Paolo Pumilia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Paolo> - Started lyx from console - created new doc - added two lines:
> Paolo> the first one marked as section, the second one as - subsection
> Paolo> -
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> My understanding is that the Windows installer will continue to
Angus> check for msys, python, ghostview et al., but only to generate
Angus> a \path_prefix entry in lyxrc.dist.
Not for viewer, I think. We have other plans for
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Given that Win95 is dead as a dodo, it may well be that you don't need the
>> NewAPIs.h. The only way to check, however, is to compile (on a WinXP machine,
>> presumably) and then see if it'll run on Win98. That's what the stub magic in
>> NewAPIs.h
Bo Peng wrote:
>> > Abdel> - Bo's session management
>> >
>> > I am not sure about this one, since it seems that all problems have
>> > not been solved yet, and making a complete patch for 1.4 will probably
>> > be too difficult.
>
> Please specify which ones have not been fixed. There is only
but no configuration should be lost).
There lastfiles are gone after an upgration? I would say that is nothing.
Bo
> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I tried what you describe but do not see the errors? Do you use
>> Italian menus? I tried both that and plain english.
Enrico> Please, see attached files.
I did not manage to obtain the same, but actually I do not manage to
have
Bo Peng wrote:
> I have never used this feature and I assumed that this behavior is
> designed to be so from day one. The patch has been committed, and can
> be partly reverted once this is fixed. (Georg complained that he can
> not use session because of this.)
I think this patch is still
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> There was the fact that document got added to the recently loaded
>> list, if I remember. I think this is related to the way you add
>> these files to the 'files' vector. It may be better (if possible)
>> to load them directly.
Bo> Sorry, I do
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Bo Peng wrote:
>> I have never used this feature and I assumed that this behavior is
>> designed to be so from day one. The patch has been committed, and
>> can be partly reverted once this is fixed. (Georg complained that
>> he can
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 04:24:01PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Martin> On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 02:54:49PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> Martin> wrote:
> >> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Bo Peng wrote:
I have never used this feature and I assumed that this behavior is
designed to be so from day one. The patch has been committed, and
can be partly reverted once this is fixed. (Georg
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> So it is broken and will stay broken? It is not that important, after
> all this simply avoids an empty "TeX Information", but I am really
> annoyed that seemingly everything which is cygwin related is not
> well accepted.
Bullshit. In my case I don't have the energy
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Georg" == Georg Baum
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> writes:
>
> Georg> I think this patch is still needed. Even if this is currently
> Georg> not implemented, there is a valid reason to automatically open
> Georg> child documents: Fill the TOC menu with
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Because we had a completely different update system?
Martin> Yes, that's what I suspect too. So we must get this working
Martin> from scratch then.
Martin> Could lyxfunc be made sensitive to LyXAction flags? Would that
Martin> be
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Also, (now that I tried it in 1.5) wouldn't it be more readable by
> trying to put the arrows on the left and bottom border of the inset?
I did not increase the area covered by the phantom inset in comparison to
the contents on purpose, otherwise you would not get
Dear Wannabe LyX for Windows developer,
I have updated the wiki with some instruction wrt to building LyX using
mingw, cygwin and Qt4: http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX150Experimental
In principle everything is there in order to build LyX for windows but
it is not tested. Edwin, please give this
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am less sure about that. Is it really a gain to check for python in
> configure.py?
Touché!
A.
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Also, (now that I tried it in 1.5) wouldn't it be more readable by
>> trying to put the arrows on the left and bottom border of the
>> inset?
Georg> I did not increase the area covered by the phantom
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:50:44PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Enrico> If you mean cygwin in general, then you are practically
> Enrico> forcing me to maintain my own 1.4 branch as I care about it.
>
> Not cygwin in
I am sure that you will get more positive feedback if you follow this
procedure.
I really was interested in pushing some of my patches in, because I
think they are important, if not essential, and other people can
benefit from them. However, I feel less and less motivated in doing
so. I am
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So it is broken and will stay broken? It is not that important, after
>> all this simply avoids an empty "TeX Information", but I am really
>> annoyed that seemingly everything which is cygwin related is not
>> well accepted.
> Bullshit. In my case I
> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Enrico> On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:50:44PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Enrico> wrote:
>> > "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Enrico> If you mean cygwin in general, then you are practically
Enrico>
Bo Peng a écrit :
I am sure that you will get more positive feedback if you follow this
procedure.
I really was interested in pushing some of my patches in, because I
think they are important, if not essential, and other people can
benefit from them. However, I feel less and less motivated in
The Noop thing works like magic. I do not understand how it handles
enable/disable and makrDirty though.
>> I would like also to have an adaptation of your patch to remove
>> USE_COMPRESSION, if you can do that for me.
Patch 1: Remove USE_COMPRESSION for 1.4
Patch 2: LFUN_TOGGLE_COMPRESSION
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 04:52:02PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> > So it is broken and will stay broken? It is not that important, after
> > all this simply avoids an empty "TeX Information", but I am really
> > annoyed that seemingly everything which is cygwin related
Who agreed to that? Why not have a format function for Windows that doesn't
check for anything at all but just outputs a sane selection of formats (with
prettynames).
No, we want to allow users to set viewers explicitly. The system
should set viewers to "" or "auto' and allow users to set them
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bo> The Noop thing works like magic. I do not understand how it
Bo> handles enable/disable and makrDirty though.
It goes like this:
Noop: a normal lfun, that operates on a non-readonly text. When it is
executed, the buffer is marked readonly
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 04:52:02PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
- explain why it is needed
- explain how well it is tested
- explain potential risks (or the lack thereof)
- ask for inclusion
I think I always did so.
- commit it (yourself) if OK
Cannot do it.
> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Enrico> Here is the problem. Nobody cares about cygwin, ergo it is not
Enrico> well accepted. I mean, you have to do something for nothing, I
Enrico> would not well accept it, too.
It is not that we do not _care_. It is just that,
I agree that getting some of the changes in was painful, but I think
the quality of the patches improved.
I agree with both, taking the recent example of Document->compressed.
If I can get feedbacks at the current speed, I have no complain. That
does not have to mean I will invest time on
You can apply patch 2 (actually, I was testing a very similar one :).
Done. Please apply 1 and/or 3 yourself since I do not have a writable
1.4 tree here.
Cheers,
Bo
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I agree that getting some of the changes in was painful, but I
>> think the quality of the patches improved.
Bo> I agree with both, taking the recent example of
Bo> Document->compressed. If I can get feedbacks at the current speed,
Bo> I have
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
So it is broken and will stay broken? It is not that important, after
all this simply avoids an empty "TeX Information", but I am really
annoyed that seemingly everything which is cygwin related is not
well accepted.
Bullshit. In
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> You can apply patch 2 (actually, I was testing a very similar one
>> :).
Bo> Done. Please apply 1 and/or 3 yourself since I do not have a
Bo> writable 1.4 tree here.
I will do so after testing.
JMarc
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 05:48:24PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Please ask for that damn svn access!
Abdel,
I am not a programmer but a "power user" (using Windows parliance),
and my contribution to LyX would be poor.
The native Windows port had screwed up the cygwin target and nobody
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Tracing down all the bugs that got fixed in 1.5 is something that
needs to be done. For example, the cursor jumping problem on inset, is
it in Juergen?
My list of patches should comprise all bug fixes that haven't been
applied yet.
Michael
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 05:48:24PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Please ask for that damn svn access!
Abdel,
I am not a programmer but a "power user" (using Windows parliance),
and my contribution to LyX would be poor.
bla bla bla...
The native Windows port
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 05:00:06PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Because we had a completely different update system?
>
> Martin> Yes, that's what I suspect too. So we must get this working
> Martin> from scratch then.
>
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Maybe, but what flag? Or add a fitcursor() member to
>> DispatchResult?
Martin> Could NoUpdate be overloaded for this?
We'll have to check that the use case is the right one.
>> The best is probably to force a fitcursor only
> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> You can apply patch 2 (actually, I was testing a very similar one
>>> :).
Bo> Done. Please apply 1 and/or 3 yourself since I do not have a
Bo> writable 1.4 tree here.
Michael Gerz a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Tracing down all the bugs that got fixed in 1.5 is something that
needs to be done. For example, the cursor jumping problem on inset, is
it in Juergen?
My list of patches should comprise all bug fixes that haven't been
applied yet.
Yep, but
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 05:54:35PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Enrico> Here is the problem. Nobody cares about cygwin, ergo it is not
> Enrico> well accepted. I mean, you have to do something for nothing, I
> Enrico>
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 06:38:04PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> >On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 05:48:24PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >
> >>Please ask for that damn svn access!
> >
> >Abdel,
> >
> >I am not a programmer but a "power user" (using Windows
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 06:40:56PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Maybe, but what flag? Or add a fitcursor() member to
> >> DispatchResult?
>
> Martin> Could NoUpdate be overloaded for this?
>
> We'll have to check that
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
My list of patches should comprise all bug fixes that haven't been
applied yet.
Yep, but you kind of defeat my whole argumentation as to why we need
1.5.0 now. Bad guy!
Abdel.
Sorry :-)
Michael
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:12:57PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> So it is broken and will stay broken? It is not that important, after
> >> all this simply avoids an empty "TeX Information", but I am really
> >> annoyed that seemingly everything which is
>> There was the fact that document got added to the recently loaded
>> list, if I remember. I think this is related to the way you add
>> these files to the 'files' vector. It may be better (if possible)
>> to load them directly.
lastopenedfiles they should be loaded with second argument
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I used to lurve fights on Fridays. Please be ruder!
> I am trying to revive the tradition but nobody follows... Do you think I
> should be even ruder?
Yeah. Tell 'em like it is!
Asger, let me introduce myself. My name is Abdelrazak Younes but most
people call me Abdel, I have done quite a lot of development for LyX in
the last three month. If there's a feature you'd like to see happening
please let me know.
So... can I come? Pleeaaase!
Abdel.
Asger Ottar Alstrup a
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 06:40:56PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Maybe, but what flag? Or add a fitcursor() member to
> >> DispatchResult?
>
> Martin> Could NoUpdate be overloaded for this?
>
> We'll have to check that
There is a revert to file problem. It is not wise to check if it is
loading time for this though. I guess we can look at the status of the
existing file, if it has no changes, just switch to it.
What I meant was attached. I am not quite sure if the logic is
correct, otherwise, if should be
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> This looks good, and since both Georg and yourself have tested it, it
> can go in.
It's in.
Jürgen
> JMarc
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> Louis, could you please try the experimental lyx for windows described
> in http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX150Experimental ?
>
Sure enough! Give me half an hour.
>
> So, if I understand you correctly, all the special code in this boost
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> Louis, could you please try the experimental lyx for windows described
> in http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX150Experimental ?
>
I downloaded the exe only zip file. Apparently, LyX 15x needs the library
zlib1.dll besides the files
Luis Rivera a écrit :
> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>
>> Louis, could you please try the experimental lyx for windows
described in http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX150Experimental ?
>>
>
> I downloaded the exe only zip file. Apparently, LyX 15x needs the
library zlib1.dll
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 06:43:14PM +, Luis Rivera wrote:
> AFAIK, LyX still works on Win95/Cygwin (on an Intel486!). Slow as anything
> can
> be, but works. On Win98 it greatly improves, thanks to the hardware. The
> real
> mess seems to be the path handling. On Cygwin everything is
Jean-Marc,
I cleaned up the patch list (see below).
I checked that r13535 has not been applied to 1.4.X yet.
What is the reason why we do not want to have r13540 in 1.4.X?
Michael
==
r13535 - MV - A more general way of setting paragraphs
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Luis Rivera a écrit :
>
> > Where did you get this file?
>
> From the gnuwin32 project. I've put it in my web site
> (younes.a.free,fr) I could not post it to the list even after having
> changed the extension so it can pass the filters.
>
Luis Rivera a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Luis Rivera a écrit :
> Where did you get this file?
From the gnuwin32 project. I've put it in my web site
(younes.a.free,fr) I could not post it to the list even after having
changed the extension so it can pass the
Gentlemen,
I think I have to give some comments on the heated 1.4 vs. 1.5 discussion.
I understand that everybody wants to have his favourite feature
available as soon as possible. However, we are obliged to provide the
LyX users with a series of stable versions at the same time. If someone
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 02:48:49PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > (Wrt unicode, unless I get some help it will go
> | > slowly forward.)
> |
> | I suspect you won't find any help if you don't push your changes into trunk.
>
> Then trunk
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 09:08:19PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >4) Extend QFileDialog without hacking. Just create the beast, hunt
> >through the list of child widgets and layouts until you find something
> >appropriate, and add a new button as child widget there.
>
> I'd say this is a hack
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 05:00:06PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Because we had a completely different update system?
>
> Martin> Yes, that's what I suspect too. So we must get this working
> Martin> from scratch then.
>
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 09:49:26AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andre> I would think that instead of immediate updates, some
> Andre> 'invalidation' could happen that could be accumulated until a
> Andre> real 'update' is
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 09:03:42PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >>> I regenerated it, but it looks the same to me... Are you sure you are
> >>> up to date?
> >> I am up to date and I still cannot apply the patch (same error). I guess
> >> this an eol issue.
> >
> >Just out of curiosity: Is
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Cygwin runs on top of Windows. It works because it is developed by
> competent people **who** know how to deal with various Windows flavors.
>
Agree...
> The path handling is not a mess in my copy of LyX, perhaps it is
> in the official
small update (yes i am stuck)
i did the following:
1. installed cygwin
latest setup from the cygwin site. used the default settings and added
automake, make and gettext (?)
2. installed qt-4.1.2 and also let the installer install mingw (3.4.2)
3. using tortoisesvn checked out trunk into
Leuven, E. a écrit :
small update (yes i am stuck)
i did the following:
1. installed cygwin
latest setup from the cygwin site. used the default settings and added
automake, make and gettext (?)
You will need autoconf and perl also.
2. installed qt-4.1.2 and also let the installer
Andre Poenitz a écrit :
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 09:08:19PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
4) Extend QFileDialog without hacking. Just create the beast, hunt
through the list of child widgets and layouts until you find something
appropriate, and add a new button as child widget there.
I'd say
> You will need autoconf and perl also.
they are installed (see below)
>> PS in what directory do i need to install zlib and libiconv btw ?
> in mingw tree. Copy the gnuwin32 packages in Mingw root directory and
> under cygwin shell do: tar zxvf xxx.tar.gz
ok
> Why didn't you try my "ready"
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 08:30:18PM +, Luis Rivera wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think it "looks" native because the interface to the user doesn't go
> through
> the command prompt; however, it is may not a native application. To be
> a "native" application it
Andre Poenitz a écrit :
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 09:03:42PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I regenerated it, but it looks the same to me... Are you sure you are
up to date?
I am up to date and I still cannot apply the patch (same error). I guess
this an eol issue.
Just out of curiosity: Is
Leuven, E. a écrit :
You will need autoconf and perl also.
they are installed (see below)
Hum, do you have aclocal.m4 in lyx root directory?
I apparently cannot send file with m4 extension.
Abdel.
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 10:32:36PM +0200, Leuven, E. wrote:
> small update (yes i am stuck)
>
> i did the following:
>
> 1. installed cygwin
>latest setup from the cygwin site. used the default settings and added
>automake, make and gettext (?)
>
> 2. installed qt-4.1.2 and also let the
> Hum, do you have aclocal.m4 in lyx root directory?
nope (acinclude.m4 i have though).
isn't autogen.sh supposed to create aclocal.m4?
putting the one you send me there doesn't make a difference though...
> It seems that the postinstall script did not run.
don't think this is the problem. all the scripts end with .done
running autogen.sh gives:
$ sh ./autogen.sh
Using automake (GNU automake) 1.9.6
Using autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.59
Locating GNU m4... /usr/bin/m4
Generate acinclude.m4... done.
Leuven, E. a écrit :
> Hum, do you have aclocal.m4 in lyx root directory?
nope (acinclude.m4 i have though).
I see, you don't have the aclocal (perl) program. Weird because this is
supposed to be part of the automake package. Try to see in the cygwin
installer if you can find it. I'll
> I see, you don't have the aclocal (perl) program.
but i have:
$ which aclocal
/usr/bin/aclocal
$ which aclocal-1.9
/usr/bin/aclocal-1.9
...
Leuven, E. a écrit :
I see, you don't have the aclocal (perl) program.
but i have:
$ which aclocal
/usr/bin/aclocal
$ which aclocal-1.9
/usr/bin/aclocal-1.9
Then I don't know :-(
Abdel.
> Then I don't know :-(
ah well, maybe it will work tomorrow. one never knows with windows...
thanks, edwin
Leuven, E. a écrit :
I see, you don't have the aclocal (perl) program.
autogen.sh has this:
ACLOCAL="aclocal -I ${PWD}/m4"
if ( $ACLOCAL --version ) < /dev/null > /dev/null 2>&1; then
Please try this:
aclocal -I ./m4 --version
Here it gives:
aclocal (GNU automake) 1.9.6
Written by Tom Tromey
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 11:29:14PM +0200, Leuven, E. wrote:
> > I see, you don't have the aclocal (perl) program.
>
> but i have:
>
> $ which aclocal
> /usr/bin/aclocal
>
> $ which aclocal-1.9
> /usr/bin/aclocal-1.9
You should have:
$ ls -l /usr/bin/aclocal
lrwxrwxrwx 1 ef users 25 Jun 13
Leuven, E. a écrit :
i see the same, and yes ./m4 is there...
So just do:
$ aclocal -I ./m4
And be done with it!
Looking at autogen.sh, I don't understand why it doesn't work.
Abdel.
-Original Message-
From: news on behalf of Abdelrazak Younes
Sent: Fri 4/28/06 23:43
To:
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 11:49:06PM +0200, Leuven, E. wrote:
>
> yep, i see the same...
>
> version 1.9.6 btw
Please, try running ./autogen.sh without prefixing it with sh.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Enrico Forestieri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Fri 4/28/06 23:46
> To:
and this is what i get...!
$ aclocal -I ./m4
270 [main] ? (10884) C:\cygwin\bin\sh.exe: *** fatal error - couldn't
allocate heap, Win32 error 487, base 0x4D, top 0x4E, reserve_size
61440, allocsize 65536, page_const 4096
8 [main] sh 10848 child_copy: stack write copy failed,
Leuven, E. a écrit :
and this is what i get...!
$ aclocal -I ./m4
270 [main] ? (10884) C:\cygwin\bin\sh.exe: *** fatal error -
couldn't allocate heap, Win32 error 487, base 0x4D, top 0x4E,
reserve_size 61440, allocsize 65536, page_const 4096
8 [main] sh 10848 child_copy:
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 11:56:17PM +0200, Leuven, E. wrote:
> and this is what i get...!
>
> $ aclocal -I ./m4
> 270 [main] ? (10884) C:\cygwin\bin\sh.exe: *** fatal error - couldn't
> allocate heap, Win32 error 487, base 0x4D, top 0x4E, reserve_size
> 61440, allocsize 65536,
> Please, have a look here:
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2005-09/msg00945.html
will give that a try and report back tomorrow...
thanks guys!
regards, ed.
Dear all,
I still have not heard some agreement on how our official installer
should look like. What I was proposing is something in between the two
current installers that
1. free of license problem (legal)
2. only have the essentials (small).
3. try to support a wide range of settings
4. and
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 08:30:18PM +, Luis Rivera wrote:
> > Enrico Forestieri ...> writes:
>
> > I think it "looks" native because the interface to the user doesn't go
through
> > the command prompt; however, it is may not a native
Attached is a modified patch that
1. in configure.py, under windows/cygwin, %% is replaced by auto.
Programs are not actually checked. ( so no waste of time)
checkFormatEntries(os.name != 'nt' and sys.platform != 'cygwin')
2. in graph.c, the logic is:
+ if (!only_viewable ||
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 11:15:53PM +, Luis Rivera wrote:
> Having that definition in mind, then none of your exes is a "true native"
> windows app. Sorry! ;-)
I have never claimed they are :-)
> However, I tested both on Win98, and both work pretty much as expected:
>
> 1/ LyX "native"
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 10:24:09PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> I have put another package which contains the exe and the needed
> runtimes dll:
> http://younes.a.free.fr/Lyx-15-experimental/lyx-qt4-exe-and-dlls.zip
Abdel,
I tried your LyX/Qt4 and got a bug report for you.
After
301 - 400 of 400 matches
Mail list logo
