Hi,
Am Sonntag 02 Januar 2011 schrieb kate.alh...@nokia.com:
You have not yet installed Qt Components package, exactly same way that you
need include and link
libraries in C++ Qt, you need import Component libraries for Qml.
Ok, that's correct. Yesterday i followed these instructions:
From: ext Till Harbaum / Lists [li...@harbaum.org]
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2011 2:40 PM
To: Alhola Kate (Nokia-FNDC/Helsinki)
Cc: bernd.str...@gmail.com; meego-dev@meego.com
Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps without
Hi,
Am Dienstag 28 Dezember 2010 schrieb Bernd Stramm:
What seems very ironic about the situation is that there appears to be
a new, strict separation between the UX layers for mobile and desktop.
Speaking of this:
I have meegotouch running native on my ubuntu desktop, i have qtmobility
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Till Harbaum / Lists li...@harbaum.org wrote:
I have meegotouch running native on my ubuntu desktop, i have qtmobility
running native there, i have the latest qtcreator 2.1.0beta and still i can't
run meego qml apps:
of developing QT apps
without libmeegotouch over MTF enabled application?
Am Dienstag 28 Dezember 2010 schrieb Bernd Stramm:
What seems very ironic about the situation is that there appears to be
a new, strict separation between the UX layers for mobile and desktop.
Speaking of this:
I have
Am Dienstag 28 Dezember 2010 schrieb Bernd Stramm:
What seems very ironic about the situation is that there appears to be
a new, strict separation between the UX layers for mobile and desktop.
The current MeeGo desktop UX is mostly a port of the Moblin Clutter/Mutter
based desktop UX for
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 3:45 AM, David Guimard
david.guim...@mydbobjects.com wrote:
I thought it was more than clear , it s written in the first page of Meego
sdk1.1
the sample located here
http://meego.gitorious.org/meegotouch/libmeegotouch/trees/master/examples
+ the power of qt
What are the advantages of developing QT apps without libmeegotouch over MTF
(Meego touch framework) enabled application.?
If we need to implement gestures for any given use case, will a application
based on libmeegotouch be more smoother than QT app without libmeegotouch?
Any touch testing
Disadvantage with both QWidgets (which is what I assume you mean by Qt w/o
meegotouch) and mtf is that neither is an officially supported solution, i.e.
you are on your own if you use them. If something works today (e.g. gestures),
somebody may decide to break it tomorrow without prior warning.
From: meego-dev-boun...@meego.com [meego-dev-boun...@meego.com] on behalf of
ext Ville M. Vainio [vivai...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 3:23 PM
To: Rohit Baravkar; meego-dev
Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010, 13:50:35 GMT, kate.alh...@nokia.com wrote:
With Qt Quick you have all enablers for full MeeGo UX and in Qt Quick
Components you have all UX components ready made.
Well, not yet. And it's not yet clear what that means in terms of good
cross-platform support (e.g. Symbian,
A related question for me as I'm going to implement a couple of UXs
soon, what sort of already ready made regular application components
are available from Qt Quick Components right now?
Button, Windows, Dialogs? Can I use everything I would have used using
Qt Designer default mainwindow app
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Sivan Greenberg si...@omniqueue.com wrote:
A related question for me as I'm going to implement a couple of UXs
soon, what sort of already ready made regular application components
are available from Qt Quick Components right now?
You can follow the progress
are the advantages of developing QT apps
without libmeegotouch over MTF enabled application?
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010, 13:50:35 GMT, kate.alh...@nokia.com wrote:
With Qt Quick you have all enablers for full MeeGo UX and in Qt Quick
Components you have all UX components ready made.
Well, not yet. And it's
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Andrew Flegg and...@bleb.org wrote:
With Qt Quick you have all enablers for full MeeGo UX and in Qt Quick
Components you have all UX components ready made.
Well, not yet. And it's not yet clear what that means in terms of good
cross-platform support (e.g.
apps without
libmeegotouch over MTF enabled application?
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Andrew Flegg and...@bleb.org wrote:
With Qt Quick you have all enablers for full MeeGo UX and in Qt Quick
Components you have all UX components ready made.
Well, not yet. And it's not yet clear what
From: meego-dev-boun...@meego.com [meego-dev-boun...@meego.com] on behalf of
ext Benoît HERVIER [kher...@khertan.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 5:52 PM
To: meego-dev@meego.com
Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps
(Sorry about posting at meego-dev - it appears almost nobody is
on-topic on this mailing list, so one more won't hurt).
2010/12/28 Benoît HERVIER kher...@khertan.net:
Currently it s look like a new technology, require to reconstruct many
things, isn't ready, and many push for using it. It s
Hi,
Am Dienstag 28 Dezember 2010 schrieb Ville M. Vainio:
QWidgets were not good enough for anybody
You are talking about these QWidgets that several tutorials on the meego
conference were about?
Are you really wondering why developers are confused and loosing confidence in
all this? Do you
On Tuesday, 28 de December de 2010 14:37:26 kate.alh...@nokia.com wrote:
What is the timescale and roadmap for Qt Quick Components?
Thiago or Henrik Harz can comment this issue ?
As soon as humanly possible. So sometime in Q1 or Q2 in 2011. Hopefully in
time for us to talk about in the MeeGo
apps
without libmeegotouch over MTF enabled application?
Am Dienstag 28 Dezember 2010 schrieb Ville M. Vainio:
QWidgets were not good enough for anybody
You are talking about these QWidgets that several tutorials on the meego
conference were about?
Are you really wondering why developers
On Tuesday, 28 de December de 2010 19:50:35 kate.alh...@nokia.com wrote:
I promise that we in Forum Nokia do everything to get developers informed as
well as possible. We release Qt Quick Components pre-alpha as soon as we
get it done, we released Qt for Maemo5 with first SDK. Reason that you
2010/12/28 Till Harbaum / Lists li...@harbaum.org:
Am Dienstag 28 Dezember 2010 schrieb Ville M. Vainio:
QWidgets were not good enough for anybody
You are talking about these QWidgets that several tutorials on the meego
conference were about?
Are you really wondering why developers are
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 21:21:46 +0100
Ville M. Vainio vivai...@gmail.com wrote:
If someone is *still* confused, do let us know and we can make it more
explicit in the future.
What seems very ironic about the situation is that there appears to be
a new, strict separation between the UX
On Tuesday 28 Dec 2010 20:41:51 Bernd Stramm wrote:
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 21:21:46 +0100
Ville M. Vainio vivai...@gmail.com wrote:
If someone is *still* confused, do let us know and we can make it more
explicit in the future.
What seems very ironic about the situation is that
: meego-dev@meego.com
Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT
apps without libmeegotouch over MTF enabled application?
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 21:21:46 +0100
Ville M. Vainio vivai...@gmail.com wrote:
If someone is *still* confused, do let us know and we can make
From: ext Till Harbaum / Lists [li...@harbaum.org]
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 10:27 PM
To: Alhola Kate (Nokia-FNDC/Helsinki)
Cc: meego-dev@meego.com
Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps without
libmeegotouch over MTF
On 12/28/2010 9:21 PM, Ville M. Vainio wrote:
2010/12/28 Till Harbaum / Listsli...@harbaum.org:
Am Dienstag 28 Dezember 2010 schrieb Ville M. Vainio:
QWidgets were not good enough for anybody
You are talking about these QWidgets that several tutorials on the meego
conference were about?
28 matches
Mail list logo
