Greetings,
Try to install OpenBSD 4.2 i386 on a new HP Compaq dc7700 Small Form Factor,
but when it comes to install the software sets from the CD, the install
fails:
...
...
...
Password for root account? (will not echo)
Password for root account? (again)
Let's install the sets!
Loc
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Joe wrote:
Wow. I didn't know this changed.
This was announced on ports@ IIRC.
So if there are security bugs in a package or port shipped with OpenBSD 4.2,
there will be no updated package or updated port available?
That is correct.
--
Antoine
Jacob Meuser wrote:
the
README.libcdio file in the libcdio sources mentions this file and
says it can't be included because it's not GPL. I contacted the
libcdio maintainer about this file, and he again said he could not
include it because the BSD license is incompatible.
Yes, our community o
Wow. I didn't know this changed.
So if there are security bugs in a package or port shipped with
OpenBSD 4.2, there will be no updated package or updated port available?
I'm in no position to ask someone to do this, so I won't. But this
really bites.
On Dec 11, 2007, at 8:09 AM, Antoine
* ropers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-12 01:17:32]:
*snip*
>
> In addition, it is *considerably harder* to install unfree software on
> OpenBSD than on gNewSense. This eg. is what installing Skype entails:
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.bsd.india/352
> On gNewSense, it is *much* easier to
Yesterday, after a long time, it give me a empty page.
Today, It's OK.
2007/12/12, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Dec 11, 2007 11:26 AM, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Dec 11, 2007 12:58 AM, Dongsheng Song <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > 2007/12/11, Darren Spruell
Lars NoodC)n wrote:
>
>> Argh, the GPL is so ridiculously complex; nobody understands it.
>>
>
> Many do, though. For me it's rather straight forward, as is the BSD
> license. There are many ways to look at the positive goals of the GPL,
> but they're not relevant here, since OpenBSD is a
I'd like to add two things I forgot earlier on, for Richards consideration:
On 12/12/2007, ropers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is IMHO very similar to the way the OpenBSD ports system is
> related to unfree software:
> - The unfree software is not hosted by OpenBSD. The ports tree
> effective
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:11:25PM -0700, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
> Jacob Meuser wrote:
> >his absolutism also causes people to see BSD as a "problem", a
> >"social failure".
> >
> In everything, there is light and dark, interwoven :-)
> >recently we saw theft of BSD to GPL, and a large part of the
On Dec 11, 2007 3:48 PM, Siegbert Marschall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it April 2008 already, or what is happening on this mailing list ?
No, but it is about the time for the monthly "what is happening to
misc" comments ;)
-B
Nick Guenther wrote:
On 12/11/07, Chris Zakelj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nick Guenther wrote:
On Dec 11, 2007 12:30 AM, Chris Zakelj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Curious problem here, though I'm probably missing something obvious. I
have apm enabled through /etc/rc.conf.local (
On 12/11/07, Chris Zakelj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nick Guenther wrote:
> > On Dec 11, 2007 12:30 AM, Chris Zakelj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Curious problem here, though I'm probably missing something obvious. I
> >> have apm enabled through /etc/rc.conf.local (apmd_flags=""), and wh
Nick Guenther wrote:
On Dec 11, 2007 12:30 AM, Chris Zakelj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Curious problem here, though I'm probably missing something obvious. I
have apm enabled through /etc/rc.conf.local (apmd_flags=""), and when I
issue 'shutdown -h -p now', the system powers off correctly.
Thank You all for the pointers
I now have it up and running and only have a small persistent route problem.
Bret
Stuart Henderson wrote:
>On 2007/12/11 08:40, Bret wrote:
>
>
>>OK here is the update:
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>ral0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
>>ieee80211: nwid tri-statebroadband.com_2
knitti wrote:
you tell me that there is some correlation between HTTP keep alives and
a socket ending up in CLOSE_WAIT for some time. That is the practical
observation. But I'm interested in whether this is by design or not.
RFC 2616 doesn't mention implementation details, and I can't see why
the
Is it April 2008 already, or what is happening on this mailing list ?
I am about two weeks behind reading but out of curiosity I read a few
emails in this thread and well, almost can't believe it.
I better stop reading this list for a while and come back after doing
something usefull, like instal
knitti wrote:
you tell me that there is some correlation between HTTP keep alives and
a socket ending up in CLOSE_WAIT for some time. That is the practical
observation. But I'm interested in whether this is by design or not.
RFC 2616 doesn't mention implementation details, and I can't see why
the
On 12/12/07, Daniel Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> knitti wrote:
> > HTTP keep alives have nothing to do with it. If the socket is in
> > CLOSE_WAIT, the TCP connection can't be reused, the server
> > has sent its FIN and the client its FIN/ACK, but the server doesn't
> > have yet sent its fi
On Dec 11, 2007, at 6:56 PM, Richard Stallman wrote:
Including a program by name in the ports system does suggest using
that program. It grants the program a sort of legitimacy, and that
is what I am opposed to.
Where is your line in the sand? When does an operating system become
free by
> > On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 02:00:14PM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
> > > OpenBSD is by far the most free OS in the landscape. Everything that
> > > ships with it is free or else it won't be distributed with it.
> > >
> > > Yes, that's what I was told. I was also told that OpenBSD's por
Jacob Meuser wrote:
his absolutism also causes people to see BSD as a "problem", a
"social failure".
In everything, there is light and dark, interwoven :-)
recently we saw theft of BSD to GPL, and a large part of the
GPL community thinks there's no problem with that, that the
BSD community i
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 04:49:34PM -0500, STeve Andre' wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 December 2007 14:00:43 Richard Stallman wrote:
> > Why don't you ask Theo, whom you once praised, about OpenBSD?
> >
> > Because he tends to be unfriendly.
>
> Now *that* I find humorous.
>
> I find it Kafka-esque,
> I think it would be wrong for me to recommend it to others. Therefore,
> if a collection of software contains (or suggests installation of)
> some non-free program, I do not recommend it. The systems I recommend
> are therefore those that do not contain (or suggest installation
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 01:49:19PM -0700, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
> mcb, inc. wrote:
> >Watching the latest flame war, I can't help thinking that as
> >founders of their respective projects Theo and RMS are trapped
> >in a jail of rigid consistency and absolutism demanded by
> >children and utopians.
knitti wrote:
On 12/11/07, Daniel Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[... snipped away a lot ...]
There is a lots that can be done, however, when you reach this level, an
answer doesn't fit all and is really dependent on your setup.
Hope this help answering your question.
It's not me having t
Try this
ln -s /etc/X11/xkb /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb
Pau Amaro-Seoane wrote:
Hi,
as you can read in the subject, running e.g. setxkbmap us will kill X totally.
I don't see any core dumped or similar.
What can be the problem?
Here you are my dmesg (an "zzz" froze the laptop and I had to power
On 12/11/07, Daniel Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[... snipped away a lot ...]
> There is a lots that can be done, however, when you reach this level, an
> answer doesn't fit all and is really dependent on your setup.
>
> Hope this help answering your question.
It's not me having the problem,
On 11.12-16:11, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2007/12/11 16:13, Markus Bergkvist wrote:
> > I borrowed a HUAWEI modem just to see how it is recognized.
> > With umass enabled it is recognized as a CD. Disabling umass and it is
> > found as ugen.
> > From this thread http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc
Richard Stallman wrote:
Why don't you ask Theo, whom you once praised, about OpenBSD?
Because he tends to be unfriendly.
Interestingly enough, if you specified that as the reason you recommend
against using OpenBSD, this thread would have been a lot shorter.
Somehow I think Theo is more
Richard Stallman wrote:
ISTR LAME is free software, but I will double-check.
The source code of LAME is licensed under the LGPL; however, the mp3
format itself is patented and restricted. Further reading:
http://www.mp3-tech.org/patents.html
http://www.mp3licensing.com/help/developers.html
Richard Stallman wrote:
OpenBSD is by far the most free OS in the landscape. Everything that
ships with it is free or else it won't be distributed with it.
Yes, that's what I was told. I was also told that OpenBSD's ports
system includes non-free programs. Is that accurate too?
Darrin Chandler wrote:
> ... BSD/MIT/ISC licenses are more Free than GPL. There's nothing
> to debate about that. It's just the way things are ...
I don't doubt your claims one iota. But in saying that, don't
believe you have convinced me that the other side somehow has
less valid claims.
And ye
I'm a very happy user of both OpenBSD and GNU/Linux systems, but what
I don't get is, how is limiting a users choice in what he/she runs on
his/her system more free than one that doesn't?
Absolute freedom is to be able to do whatever the hell you want to
with no limitations placed on you whatsoev
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 02:00:14PM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
> > OpenBSD is by far the most free OS in the landscape. Everything that
> > ships with it is free or else it won't be distributed with it.
> >
> > Yes, that's what I was told. I was also told that OpenBSD's ports
> > sy
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 14:00:43 Richard Stallman wrote:
> Why don't you ask Theo, whom you once praised, about OpenBSD?
>
> Because he tends to be unfriendly.
Now *that* I find humorous.
I find it Kafka-esque, your inability to reccomend OpenBSD because
of some "unfree" items in the port
Richard Stallman wrote:
It looks like some people are having a discussion in which they
construct views they would find outrageous, attribute them to me, and
then try to blame me for them.
For such purposes, knowledge of my actual views might be superfluous,
even inconvenient. However, if anyon
On Dec 11, 2007 3:21 PM, Karsten McMinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2007 11:00 AM, Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > My main basis for judging any distro is the policies it has adopted.
> >
> > Everyone makes mistakes, and well-intentioned people fix their
> > mistakes
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 02:00:14PM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
> OpenBSD is by far the most free OS in the landscape. Everything that
> ships with it is free or else it won't be distributed with it.
>
> Yes, that's what I was told. I was also told that OpenBSD's ports
> system include
On Dec 11, 2007 2:00 PM, Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OpenBSD is by far the most free OS in the landscape. Everything that
> ships with it is free or else it won't be distributed with it.
>
> Yes, that's what I was told. I was also told that OpenBSD's ports
> system inclu
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 02:41:27PM -0600, Ken Ismert wrote:
> Darrin Chandler wrote:
>
> > Offering something to someone as "free" with one hand, while taking back
> > rights with the other is not free. BSD/MIT/ISC licenses retain a very
> > minimal set of rights to the original author(s), and giv
Darrin Chandler wrote:
> There seems to be a subtext in your message that one license is more
> free than the other, and that the more free license is the GPL. This is
> not true.
I like both licenses and use software under both licenses. For software I
write, I can easily see scenarios where I w
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 10:44:38PM +0300, bitbucket wrote:
> 11.12.07, 20:43, Claudio Jeker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 06:41:30PM +0300, bitbucket wrote:
> > > How I can aggregate small prefixes, received from internal peers into
> > > big one in openbgpd ? Like cisco's 'ag
mcb, inc. wrote:
Watching the latest flame war, I can't help thinking that as
founders of their respective projects Theo and RMS are trapped
in a jail of rigid consistency and absolutism demanded by
children and utopians.
Well, yes and no.
Theo's absolutism has kept OpenBSD pretty much the last
On Dec 11, 2007 2:55 PM, Josh Grosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been reading this debate with interest, and am confused on one key
> point.
>
> RMS wrote:
>
> > Ututo and gNewSense have the policy not to include non-free programs,
> > not even in a ports system.
>
> According to http://www
Hi all,
> OpenBSD "refuses to accept it's users being forced into depending on
> vendor binaries" and pushes people to "send a message that open support
> for hardware matters". Unix is becoming mainstream again. You should all
> work together at educating new people.
http://www.fsf.org/news/f
On Dec 11, 2007 11:00 AM, Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My main basis for judging any distro is the policies it has adopted.
>
> Everyone makes mistakes, and well-intentioned people fix their
> mistakes. So if someone finds a non-free program in gNewSense, or in
> OpenBSD, in vio
11.12.07, 20:43, Claudio Jeker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 06:41:30PM +0300, bitbucket wrote:
> > How I can aggregate small prefixes, received from internal peers into
> > big one in openbgpd ? Like cisco's 'aggregate-address' feature.
> > I've search in documentation and s
Watching the latest flame war, I can't help thinking that as
founders of their respective projects Theo and RMS are trapped
in a jail of rigid consistency and absolutism demanded by
children and utopians. Only at home, with the door locked,
are they free to boot their home's sole computer, a Wind
Richard Stallman wrote:
OpenBSD is by far the most free OS in the landscape. Everything that
ships with it is free or else it won't be distributed with it.
Yes, that's what I was told. I was also told that OpenBSD's ports
system includes non-free programs. Is that accurate too?
El mar, 11-12-2007 a las 14:00 -0500, Richard Stallman escribiC3:
> My main basis for judging any distro is the policies it has adopted.
So a distro that comes (de-binaryzed) from ubuntu, that comes from
debian that any of them allow you to install a (nvidia) blob or any of
the non-free ports of
I have been reading this debate with interest, and am confused on one key
point.
RMS wrote:
> Ututo and gNewSense have the policy not to include non-free programs,
> not even in a ports system.
According to http://www.gnewsense.org/Main/Features, "Universe enabled
by default"
Does selectin
Marcos Laufer wrote:
> My opinion is that more money should be raised in order to
> keep -stable up to date.
> I think it's important to mantain a stable distribution, it's one
> of the things that give openbsd it's fame of being solid rock
>
> Marcos
Seriously? More money? Like enough to woo som
Richard Stallman wrote:
>...
> On the other hand, if a distro's policies say something is allowed,
> then it isn't a mistake, and I can't expect it to be fixed. That's
> what gives me stronger concern. The presence of non-free programs
> in the OpenBSD ports system is not a mistake, it's intentio
Sir, please check my inline comments.
On 12/11/07, Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is the list at:
>http://www.gnu.org/links/links.html#FreeGNULinuxDistributions
>the list of operating systems that meet your criteria? It appears that
>gNewSense includes LAME in binary
Hi
About the ports tree, maybe you are right and OpenBSD should go kick out
the possibly 50 ports that you have a problem with.
Now, about BSD/GPL that's an other story. But that doesn't mean we can't
learn from each other and help each other.
I hope it has to do Richards efforts on the GNU
Hi,
as you can read in the subject, running e.g. setxkbmap us will kill X totally.
I don't see any core dumped or similar.
What can be the problem?
Here you are my dmesg (an "zzz" froze the laptop and I had to power it
off) and xorg.conf
But X crashed also when not using an xorg.conf (i.e., ru
knitti wrote:
On 12/11/07, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2007/12/11 09:40, Marti Martinez wrote:
Yep, synproxy in your answer for OpenBSD. For linux or freebsd, try
enabling syn cookies.
synproxy works at the start of the connection, not the end.
CLOSE_WAIT is the state where
Is the list at:
http://www.gnu.org/links/links.html#FreeGNULinuxDistributions
the list of operating systems that meet your criteria? It appears that
gNewSense includes LAME in binary format, and BLAG "recommends" it at
https://wiki.blagblagblag.org/Lame in much the same way O
OpenBSD is by far the most free OS in the landscape. Everything that
ships with it is free or else it won't be distributed with it.
Yes, that's what I was told. I was also told that OpenBSD's ports
system includes non-free programs. Is that accurate too?
There is
not a single
Um, OpenBSD is the only common OS that is actively against blobs. See
http://www.openbsd.org/lyrics.html#39
We're on the same side here.
That is good. (gNewSense and Ututo are also against blobs.)
Sir, it was brought up that the [GNU/]linux distributions you do suggest do
oft
Why don't you ask Theo, whom you once praised, about OpenBSD?
Because he tends to be unfriendly.
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 12:28:29PM -0600, Ken Ismert wrote:
> It seems likely that no one license can preserve all possible
> freedoms. In my view, both licenses have advantages the other
> cannot possess. So I don't think reconciliation is required, or
> even desirable (and, from a purely selfish
From my perspective as someone outside the BSD and GPL cultures,
both camps seem to have many more similarities than differences.
I see both Theo and Richard as principled iconoclasts, stubbornly
creating and promoting software that meets their individual high
standards, meeting and overcoming dif
On 12/11/07, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007/12/11 09:40, Marti Martinez wrote:
> > Yep, synproxy in your answer for OpenBSD. For linux or freebsd, try
> > enabling syn cookies.
>
> synproxy works at the start of the connection, not the end.
>
> CLOSE_WAIT is the state where t
On 12/11/07, Andreas Maus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 01:08:42AM +1100, mufurcz wrote:
> > b) lines 34 and 35: `could not open entropy source /dev/arandom: file not
> > found` and `using pre-chroot
> > entropy source /dev/arandom` complaining about a missing
> > /var/n
> > You've got a choice of:
(...)
> > 3/ dangerous political activist with a hidden agenda
> Or
>
> 4) not up on the OpenBSD projects goals and current licensing requirements
To quote Robert Steele (from memory):
"Given a choice between incompetence and conspiracy, always go for
incompetence, be
Rob Lytle writes:
> Here is the dmesg. Note that I have #define AZALIA_DEBUG but there
> are no debug messages.
>
> OpenBSD 4.2-current (ROBKERN3) #0: Mon Dec 10 21:56:24 PST 2007
> root@:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/ROBKERN3
Can you reproduce this (whatever it is) while running a snapsho
On 2007/12/11 09:40, Marti Martinez wrote:
> Yep, synproxy in your answer for OpenBSD. For linux or freebsd, try
> enabling syn cookies.
synproxy works at the start of the connection, not the end.
CLOSE_WAIT is the state where the network stack waits for
the application (httpd) to close the conne
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 06:41:30PM +0300, bitbucket wrote:
> How I can aggregate small prefixes, received from internal peers into
> big one in openbgpd ? Like cisco's 'aggregate-address' feature.
> I've search in documentation and source code, but found nothing about
> prefix aggregation.
>
bgp
My opinion is that more money should be raised in order to
keep -stable up to date.
I think it's important to mantain a stable distribution, it's one
of the things that give openbsd it's fame of being solid rock
Marcos
- Original Message -
From: "Antoine Jacoutot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
Using OpenBSD we build the systems we need, and they work a helluva
lot better than most of the other stuff out there. OpenBSD is free
and lets us create reliable, high performance, low maintenance
networks and services, Stuff That Just Works. In fact it's so good it
On 2007/12/10 17:32, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2007/12/10 17:06, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > I've got a ServerWorks-based Fujitsu-Siemens Xeon box. At 'halt -p'
> > (with or without acpi) the following happens (no panic).
>
> Ugh. 'reboot', too.
More info: with bsd.mp, reboot drops to ddb too,
wow how completely uninteresting. How about kicking the lawyers out and
writing some code instead? I know its a weird concept.
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:24:24PM +0100, Sebastian Raible wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 11:43:35AM -0500, Nick Guenther wrote:
> > << > their software ap
Raimo Niskanen wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 01:15:11AM +1300, Joel Wiramu Pauling wrote:
Tip.
Don't allow password challenge. Problem solved. Just use key'd ssh and this
problem disappears.
Bin there, done that.
You answered the wrong question.
I think you got the right answer many time
I recently purchased an HP LaserJet P2015 printer, and I wanted to warn
other users not to make the same mistake. The printer crashes
intermittently while trying to print PostScript files with lpd.
A little googling revealed that other users have also had problems with
this model
http://www.mac
Yep, synproxy in your answer for OpenBSD. For linux or freebsd, try
enabling syn cookies.
On Dec 11, 2007 5:43 AM, knitti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/11/07, Raimo Niskanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I want to know if and what I can do (on the server side) about HTTP
> > clients that put
How I can aggregate small prefixes, received from internal peers into big one
in openbgpd ? Like cisco's 'aggregate-address' feature.
I've search in documentation and source code, but found nothing about prefix
aggregation.
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 11:43:35AM -0500, Nick Guenther wrote:
> << their software application must ship the sources or a written notice
> on where to get sources. Since web applications are applications, all
> web applications and html pages that are powered by GNU scripts must
> ship the so
On Dec 11, 2007 11:26 AM, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2007 12:58 AM, Dongsheng Song <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > 2007/12/11, Darren Spruell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > On Dec 10, 2007 9:58 PM, Dongsheng Song <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > OpenBSD assume bios t
On Dec 11, 2007 12:58 AM, Dongsheng Song <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 2007/12/11, Darren Spruell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Dec 10, 2007 9:58 PM, Dongsheng Song <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > OpenBSD assume bios time is utc, but it's PRC, can I tell OpenBSD the
> > > bios time zone?
> >
> >
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:40:06 +0700, Bret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Greets
OK here is the update:
Internet
I
OpenBSD 4.2 (1) --- wired LAN
I
wireless card - 10.60.128.1
I
I
(the following is the problem box)
I
wireless card ral0 - 10.60.128.2
I
OpenBSD 4.
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Martin Schrvder wrote:
> Get -stable ports fixed?
Lack of interest/man power.
--
Antoine
On 2007/12/11 08:40, Bret wrote:
> OK here is the update:
> ral0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
> ieee80211: nwid tri-statebroadband.com_2 chan 3 bssid
> inet 10.60.128.2 netmask 0xc000 broadcast 10.60.191.255
> ral1: flags=8843 mtu 1500
> ieee80211: nwid tri-statebroadband.com_2_1 chan 1 b
Here is the dmesg. Note that I have #define AZALIA_DEBUG but there
are no debug messages.
OpenBSD 4.2-current (ROBKERN3) #0: Mon Dec 10 21:56:24 PST 2007
root@:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/ROBKERN3
cpu0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T7200 @ 2.00GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 2.01 GHz
cpu0:
FPU,V
- Original Message -
From: "Markus Bergkvist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I borrowed a HUAWEI modem just to see how it is recognized.
With umass enabled it is recognized as a CD. Disabling umass and it is
found as ugen.
From this thread http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=118468178731619&w=2
Gqmeg works so its either XMMS or the way XMMS controls the driver. I
will recompile XMMS.
--
"Emancipate yourself from mental slavery, none but ourselves can free
our minds" Bob Marley, Redemption Song
2007/12/11, Antoine Jacoutot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> There're no -stable packages anymore.
Get -stable ports fixed?
Best
Martin
I borrowed a HUAWEI modem just to see how it is recognized.
With umass enabled it is recognized as a CD. Disabling umass and it is
found as ugen.
From this thread http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=118468178731619&w=2
I figured it should have been recognized as ubsa. Any suggestions?
dmesg wit
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 01:08:42AM +1100, mufurcz wrote:
Hi.
> Greetings,
>
> A disk in one of the old firewalls (not exactly critical) failed (running
> OpenBSD 2.9!), and I urgently
> need a DNS server to work. Replaced the disk and installed 4.2. Starting
> `named -g` (listing below)
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Jonathan Thornburg wrote:
So, am I just "lucky" that no bugs-important-enough-for-stable-updates
have been found in any 4.2 packages yet? Is there somewere other than
http://www.openbsd.org/pkg-stable.html that I should be watching if I
want to keep -stable packages up to da
Greets
OK here is the update:
Internet
I
OpenBSD 4.2 (1) --- wired LAN
I
wireless card - 10.60.128.1
I
I
(the following is the problem box)
I
wireless card ral0 - 10.60.128.2
I
OpenBSD 4.2 (2) wired LAN em0 - 10.60.130.1
I
wireless card ral1 - 10.6
Greets
OK here is the update:
Internet
I
OpenBSD 4.2 (1) --- wired LAN
I
wireless card - 10.60.128.1
I
I
(the following is the problem box)
I
wireless card ral0 - 10.60.128.2
I
OpenBSD 4.2 (2) wired LAN em0 - 10.60.130.1
I
wireless card ral1 - 10.6
As a matter of policy, are -stable packages updated for security fixes?
I know that used to be the case, but as of today (40 days after 4.2 was
released), there are *no* 4.2-stable package updates shown at
http://www.openbsd.org/pkg-stable.html. In contrast, there are 183
4.1-stable updates shown
I found a reference to commenting out tty03 in /etc/ttys. The
machine now boots. Why? I have no idea.
Rob.
--
"Emancipate yourself from mental slavery, none but ourselves can free
our minds" Bob Marley, Redemption Song
Hi,
mufurcz wrote:
Greetings,
A disk in one of the old firewalls (not exactly critical) failed
(running OpenBSD 2.9!), and I urgently
need a DNS server to work. Replaced the disk and installed 4.2.
Starting `named -g` (listing below),
produces a few surprising messages, like:
a) line 3:
Greetings,
A disk in one of the old firewalls (not exactly critical) failed
(running OpenBSD 2.9!), and I urgently
need a DNS server to work. Replaced the disk and installed 4.2.
Starting `named -g` (listing below),
produces a few surprising messages, like:
a) line 3: BIND trying to load
Lars NoodC)n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Articles and other means of providing information about OpenBSD will
> increase knowledge of OpenBSD.
Yes. I was pretty determined to stay out of this thread entirely, but
I think you touch on an important point here. Like most people who
have been in
On Dec 11, 2007, at 4:43 AM, Lars Noodin wrote:
Marc Espie wrote:
...
You've got a choice of:
Or
4) not up on the OpenBSD projects goals and current licensing
requirements
Some of that is probably due to the low profile of OpenBSD (low-
profile
is good, though) and the yammering of the Fre
Thanks for All!
I'll be working in the source code of fxtv too. I'll wish that it record audio
in (48000Khz)
> hmm, I will take a look at what's going on with fxtv.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
