Re: New Western Digital disks will have 4KB block size - issue?

On 17/12/2009, at 11:02 PM, Henning Brauer wrote: * Aaron Mason simplersolut...@gmail.com [2009-12-17 03:50]: From what I've seen, 4k blocks are supported by most filesystems anyway - and besides, provided the partitions are created on 4k block boundaries, there's no reason for any concern

Re: vi in /bin

On 18/12/2009, at 1:26 PM, Raymond Lillard wrote: Brad Tilley wrote: On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:12 -0800, Randal L. Schwartz mer...@stonehenge.com wrote: Brad == Brad Tilley b...@16systems.com writes: Brad I use ed in emergencies when /usr is inaccessible, but I'm a lot more Brad comfortable

Re: splassert: vwakeup: and friends

can you tell me what version of src/sys/scsi/sd.c you are running? cheers, dlg On 23/12/2009, at 12:37 PM, frantisek holop wrote: hi there, i was having difficulties reproducing this (as expected probably) but i managed to get one trace: splassert: biodone: want 80 have 0 Starting stack

4k sector disks

ola, ive recently made a start on better supporting disks in openbsd that present 512 byte logical sectors, but actually use 4096 byte physical sectors on the platter. the best examples of these are the western digital advanced format SATA drives which have been mention on misc@ before. it was

Re: TRIM support?

On 21/04/2010, at 3:58 AM, Daniel Barowy wrote: Hello, Anyone know the status/plans of TRIM support in OpenBSD? I poked around a bit in ahci.c and scsi.c, but nothing pops out at me (I also don't really know what I'm looking for). the status of TRIM support is that there is none. i have no

Re: pf change in upgrade47.html

On 12/05/2010, at 9:28 PM, Rod Whitworth wrote: Particularly seeing I referenced both of those in my original post as not being helpful and I've been trying to get somebody - anybody - to write a minimal NAT ruleset and show me. i use the following on my router at home: pass block log on

Re: hfsc service curve

On 21/05/2010, at 5:43 PM, Leonardo Lombardo wrote: Hi all, can someone describe me exactly how hfsc service curve works ? I've tried playing with this parameter but with no success. I think if I specify something like upperlimit(x, n, y) then tcp connections that are in that queue will get

Re: 4.7 identifies HDDs differently than 4.6 (during upgrade)

On 06/06/2010, at 12:29 PM, Neal Hogan wrote: Don't act like this is normal. Where in the archives has this been reported? Like I said, I appreciate the difference and the suggestions. The archives require this post, because it is unexpected. Thanks for the help.

Re: power management of USB-connected disks

On 20/07/2010, at 2:48 AM, Jan Stary wrote: I run a small server using an ALIX box and a CF card (wd0) plus two external disks (sd0, sd1) - see the dmesg at bottom. The CF card holds the system, while the two external disks are big storages that are only used sparsely; one of them is a (NFS

Re: testing a drive with dd -- odd results

id try this on a sili(4), ahci(4), or mpi(4) controller and see what happens. my guess is you're hitting issues in the ata stack, specifically to do with the block offsets of your io ops. dlg On 01/01/2010, at 12:03 AM, Scott McEachern wrote: I've been using dd to test some of my hard drives

Re: iSCSI status

On 19/01/2010, at 7:04 PM, Michael Lechtermann wrote: Hi, Is it already possible to mount iSCSI devices with OpenBSD(-current)? no.

Re: iSCSI status

On 30/01/2010, at 10:34 PM, Claudio Jeker wrote: On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 08:08:51PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote: On 19/01/2010, at 7:04 PM, Michael Lechtermann wrote: Hi, Is it already possible to mount iSCSI devices with OpenBSD(-current)? no. You're such a pessimist, dlg. so

Re: -CURRENT, VLANs, NAT

On 02/02/2010, at 1:51 PM, James Peltier wrote: match out on vlan301 from vlan303:network nat-to vlan301 all the cool kids are going: match out on vlan301 nat-to vlan301 received-on vlan303

Re: Is OpenBSD + PF accredited or certified in any way ?

On 03/02/2010, at 8:49 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2010-02-01, Keith ke...@scott-land.net wrote: I've used OpenBSD PF for a number of years without issue and am now in the position that I want to create a dmz between the Internet and my organisations WAN. Our security people are asking

iSCSI NAS/SAN for claudio@

hello, i would encourage people to consider sending donations in for this, i think it would be an extremely good investment. claudio already has a good start on an implementation of an iscsi initiator, but he's at the point where he needs real gear to work and test against. given the gear i fully

Re: dhcpd and synchronisation

On 16/02/2010, at 1:57 AM, Dominique Goncalves wrote: Hello, I've installed two OpenBSD 4.6 servers with dhcpd and synchronisation option (server1 server2). So far everything works, leases are sync between servers. If I shutdown server1, server2 will give address to new computers but

Re: VLANs and security (was:network performance problems)

On 17/02/2010, at 12:12 PM, Jason Dixon wrote: On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 07:54:47PM -0600, Corey wrote: Throwing out a topic for discussion...I have seen a couple of posts on here regarding use of VLANs to segregate traffic that I would usually use separate interfaces for. I am just curious

Re: network performance problems

a lot of the features you list below are only useful or usable at the switching layer, and therefore not really fair when compared to what openbsd can do. eg, the dhcp snooping is done on the switches at the client access layer to prevent rouge dhcp servers on an l2 network. unless you put openbsd

Re: Filtering based on MAC adress

i hate to bring this up, but if you have cisco gear with dhcp snooping enabled you can enforce this on the switch. On 20/02/2010, at 8:49 PM, Jean-Francois wrote: Good morning, Is it possible to do filtering through pf or blocking traffic based of MAC adress recognition ? We want to

Re: Sun Fire 880 phantom disks

your 880 has two internal fibre loops. you see teh disks once on the first loop, and again on the second loop. i am slowly working on finishing mpath(4), which will let you see your disks once no matter how many paths you have to them. if someone could email me some spare time so i can finish

Re: Sun Fire 880 phantom disks

id use asr-disable in ofw to disable the second fc hba for now. dlg On 02/03/2010, at 12:56 AM, Pete Vickers wrote: Hei, Upon booting either 4.6-RELEASE or 4.7-BETA on my SunFire 880 causes the kernel it to 'see' twice the correct number of physical disk. Further if I install the o/s

Re: OpenBSD amd64 crashes when reading cd0 (-current)

On 10/03/2010, at 1:54 PM, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote: Hi @misc: My OpenBSD amd64 box running current (as march 4, 2010), is dying unexpectedly when reading /dev/rcd0c: can you be more specific about what reading /dev/rcd0c is? are you dding off it, or using cdio, or what? dmesg:

Re: RouterBOARD RB600A support

On 14/03/2010, at 4:41 AM, P. Souza wrote: Has anyone tested the network throughput on these sweet little things? not really. ive always been limited by the speed of wireless, or the speed of the dsl link im using. i havent got close to high cpu usage on my rb600 unless i was compiling stuff.

Re: RouterBOARD RB600A support

On 14/03/2010, at 10:36 AM, P. Souza wrote: Has anyone tested the network throughput on these sweet little things? Not that relevant but I thought I'd share my findings anyway. According to some page I found(TM), the RB600 measured about 250 Mbps on iperf on both debian and routerOS[1]. I

Re: ZFS in OpenBSD

if you can get oracle to change the license to something acceptable to the openbsd tree then id consider porting it. On 22/03/2010, at 9:33 PM, Dan Naumov wrote: Hello Are there any plans to bring ZFS support to OpenBSD so that users don't have to worry about things like fsck, running out of

Re: whiteboard over the net

On 30/03/2010, at 2:55 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote: I have been looking for some sort of whiteboard like software that runs over the net. Anyone know a name of a port? i want multiplayer vi.

Re: Checking Routes/Gateways For Good Connection

relayd can do this i think. On 26/08/2010, at 9:10 AM, dontek wrote: Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote: Don Tek wrote: I've recently implemented a firewall with two internet connections using multipath routing and round-robin outbound load balancing. I am looking for a solution from the shell to

Re: Recommendations for a SATA controller ?

On 28/08/2010, at 12:19 AM, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote: Hi there, I'm willing to buy a SATA controller (PCI) with at least 4 ports. I'll put it on an Alpha 500au or a Sun Ultra 5, if it doesn't work out, on an old intel. Any recommendations ? sili(4). you might have more success with

Re: eSATA Hotplug

we'll happily take diffs though. On 29/08/2010, at 4:14 AM, Jonathan Gray wrote: There is currently no support for native sata hotplug in OpenBSD, so this is expected. On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 07:31:26PM +0200, Gerald Holl wrote: Hello, I'm using OpenBSD 4.7 on an IBX 530 Intel Atom[1]. If

Re: Slow disk IO HP DL120 G5 with LSI1068E

On 01/09/2010, at 8:37 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2010-08-31, Evgeniy Sudyr eject.in...@gmail.com wrote: I have troubles with on OpenBSD 4.7 with HP DL 120 G5 Actually I'm trying to unpack src.tar.gz and see that it's very slow. ... mpi0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 Symbios Logic SAS1068E

Re: SATA/AHCI mode on 82801HBM

On 06/09/2010, at 9:04 AM, Sevan / Venture37 wrote: Hiya, Is there any reason why OpenBSD (same behaviour is exhibited on FreeBSD) uses the 82801HBM sata controller in SATA mode when the controller support AHCI mode on the MacBookPro1,3? dmesg, pcidump acpidump output here:

Re: No Livelock on 2 Oct 2010 current

On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 10:41:15PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2010-10-04, Insan Praja SW insan.pr...@gmail.com wrote: I can't see any livelocks. I'm aware of new algorithm on mclgeti got something to do with this, I just want to confirm this. If this systat output tells me the

Re: set block device timeout

can you get me a backtrace when the system panics? ive been trying to reproduce this locally without success. cheers, dlg On 13/10/2010, at 11:00 PM, Marian Hettwer wrote: Hi All, I'm wondering how I could configure scsi I/O timeout in OpenBSD. I need to fiddle around with that since I'm

Re: Advice on pf no-sync

i put no-sync on connections that are specific to a firewall. for example, there is no point syncing states for tcp connections that have one end terminated on the firewall, so on my firewalls i put no-sync on connections going to and from relayd. if you have a network on one firewall but not the

Re: LACP trunk load balancing hash algorithm

On 18/01/2011, at 11:25 PM, Insan Praja SW wrote: My november 21st i386.MP -current handles 1.3Mpps inbound and 1.3Mpps outbound packet during rootkits attacks on one of our collocated costumer, on an 80Mbps traffic, via a vlan interface. CPU is 1% idle, system still responsive (I get to ssh-ed

Re: pf commands to discuss

either: pass in log (all) on $int_if inet proto udp from $admin_pc to !$int_if \ port 33433 33626 keep state tag mytracert pass out log on $ext_if inet proto udp from $ext_if to any \ port 33433 33626 keep state tagged mytracert or: pass in log (all) on $int_if inet proto udp from

Re: Dell R310 - H200 Raid performance problem

this diff implements the disk cache ioctl handling in mpii so sd(4) can drive the change rather than have mpii(4) whack everything. modelled on the same functionality in mpi(4) and mikeb's code... could someone test this please? Index: mpii.c

Re: Dell R310 - H200 Raid performance problem

i believe the diff below should work out of the box. it pulls in all mikeb's fixes. On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 07:54:09PM +0100, ??ukasz Czarniecki wrote: With following Mike's suggestions it worked. # scsi -f /dev/rsd0c -m 8 IC: 0 ABPF: 0 CAP: 0 DISC: 0 SIZE: 0 WCE: 1 MF: 0

Re: network bandwith with em(4)

id like to reiterate ryans advice to have a look at the systat mbuf output. as he said, mclgeti will try to protect the host by restricting the number of packets placed on the rx rings. it turns out you dont need (or cant use) a lot of packets on the ring, so bumping the ring size is a useless

Re: new upper limit with BIGMEM

OpenBSD 4.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #36: Mon Apr 4 09:39:35 EST 2011 d...@hotspare.eait.uq.edu.au:/home/dlg/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC. MP real mem = 137428045824 (131061MB) avail mem = 133755703296 (127559MB) seems to work ok...

Re: 4.7 ospfd FIB/RIB synchronization

i had this same problem and fixed it in time for the 4.8 release. is it possible you can upgrade? On 20/04/2011, at 9:10 AM, Jonathan Lassoff wrote: I'm having a bit of an issue with OpenOSPFd on 4.7 running on i386 hardware. The gist of the problem is that it seems that changes to the kernel

Re: 4.7 ospfd FIB/RIB synchronization

that by going pfctl -S /dev/stdout | ssh activefw pfctl -L /dev/stdin as root on the passive fw. as a matter of interest, are you using ospf for failover on one side of your firewalls? dlg On 20/04/2011, at 2:45 PM, Jonathan Lassoff wrote: On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 7:14 PM, David Gwynne l

Re: 4.7 ospfd FIB/RIB synchronization

On 20/04/2011, at 11:08 PM, Jonathan Lassoff wrote: On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:22 AM, David Gwynne l...@animata.net wrote: you might be able to upgrade your passive firewall to 4.9 next to the active 4.7 one. it looks like the protocol stayed the same so they should be able to talk to each other

Re: use DUIDs rather than device names in fstab?

amen. anything that helps us get away from the kernels arbitrary numbering of devices to identify disks is a good thing. dlg On 28/04/2011, at 10:20 AM, Nick Holland wrote: On 04/27/11 08:27, Kent Watsen wrote: Maybe you should tell us what happened and what you were expecting. I saw the

Re: use DUIDs rather than device names in fstab?

On 29/04/2011, at 3:33 AM, Nick Holland wrote: On 04/28/2011 10:58 AM, Bryan wrote: On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 19:55, David Gwynnel...@animata.net wrote: amen. anything that helps us get away from the kernels arbitrary numbering of devices to identify disks is a good thing. dlg Would

Re: use DUIDs rather than device names in fstab?

this is why i like duids: OpenBSD 4.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #1: Fri Apr 29 14:55:51 EST 2011 d...@hotspare.eait.uq.edu.au:/home/dlg/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC. MP real mem = 137428045824 (131061MB) avail mem = 133755645952 (127559MB) mainbus0 at root bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 2.6

Re: use DUIDs rather than device names in fstab?

On 29/04/2011, at 4:48 PM, Otto Moerbeek wrote: Op 29 apr. 2011 om 07:00 heeft David Gwynne l...@animata.net het volgende geschreven: this is why i like duids: Is this what you get when you max out every option when ordering a machine? no...

Re: Hardware for PF - more general questions

On 14/11/2007, at 8:11 PM, Richard Wilson wrote: I have been pondering for some time getting a new core router, and a recent question on HP Procurves vs Soekris boxes has kicked me into thought. I have some more general questions: I recall hearing tell (on here I think) that amd64 is a better

Re: Subversion/Apache Mod dav

Hi, are you trying to use the subversion port, are you trying to roll your own? dlg On 13/11/2007, at 3:14 PM, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:49:08 -0600 Duncan Patton a Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Howdy? I'm trying to install mod_dav_svn and mod_authz_svn

Re: Abstraction layer difference between single and multi processor kernel

On 27/11/2007, at 7:59 AM, Daniel Ouellet wrote: Hi, Please correct me if my understanding is wrong. I am trying to trace a bug and I am not sure where it is really, but I got a possible idea I want to check for if that make sense. My understanding's is that all drives are using an

Re: OpenBSD in the webcomic XKCD

dual booting is having two kernels. bsd and bsd.working. On 27/11/2007, at 2:14 AM, Artur Grabowski wrote: frantisek holop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: but can't call yerself a unix guru if havent fu*ed up dual boot at least once :] never fucked up a dual boot. Only tried it two times and

Re: Narrow down the stability of amd64.mp on Sun X4100 to mpi.c

this diff cannot affect the behavior of your system. the code below deals with domain validation on SPI mpi variants while the x4100 uses SAS mpi. the code you patched isnt run on your machine. do you have these crashes on all x4100s running amd64 mp, or only on this one machine? dlg On

Re: Narrow down the stability of amd64.mp on Sun X4100 to mpi.c

On 29/11/2007, at 4:51 AM, Daniel Ouellet wrote: David Gwynne wrote: this diff cannot affect the behavior of your system. the code below deals with domain validation on SPI mpi variants while the x4100 uses SAS mpi. the code you patched isnt run on your machine. Not sure I understand your

Re: Interactions between PF and enc0

if you're using ipsec for tunnel mode vpns i would strongly recommend you build the tunnels using gif(4) and then protecting them with ipsec in transport mode. having the traffic move via the gif tunnel allows more natural filtering with pf and easier to understand interactions with the

Re: myricom not listed in supported hardware list

yes, they work well. dlg On 29/05/2012, at 11:38 PM, Pierre Berthier wrote: Hi it seems to me the Myricom 10GB Ethernet devices should be supported by OpenBSD, according to myx(4) and the What's new page of 5.0 http://www.openbsd.org/50.html#new and actually also 4.2

Re: hint on starting tftpd -r

what are you using the rewrite stuff for? On 23/02/2013, at 5:45 PM, russell russ...@dotplan.dyndns.org wrote: So I am using tftpd -r socket and my rewrite script works however I am at a loss as to the best way to start tftpd. From my experiments, the rewrite engine has to start before

Re: hint on starting tftpd -r

On 24/02/2013, at 11:38 AM, russell russ...@dotplan.dyndns.org wrote: On 02/24/2013 11:32 PM, David Gwynne wrote: what are you using the rewrite stuff for? netbooting. me too! we unconditionally netboot all our labs (and most of our staff machines). by default we want netboot to fall out

Re: BCM5720, LACP and CARP serious problem

do you have a real serial console hooked up to the machines? more specifically, can you break into ddb when the machine breaks and get a trace? i use carp on vlans on lacp trunks on top of myx(4) and em(4) quite a lot without trouble, so its likely to be bge(4) if you ask me. unfortunately that

Re: tftpd loop

what does host -- -c say? On 29/06/2013, at 3:54 AM, Peter Fraser p...@thinkage.ca wrote: tftpd -l -c xxx resulting from a mistyping causes tftpd to into a loop

Re: PF sync doesn't not work very well

On 03/07/2013, at 10:11 PM, Mark Felder f...@feld.me wrote: On Wed, 03 Jul 2013 07:00:02 -0500, Loïc Blot loic.b...@unix-experience.fr wrote: Hello, no carp is used at this time. pfsync needs to be used with carp... without it you're just playing whack-a-mole with your session table.

Re: PF sync doesn't not work very well

On 03/07/2013, at 6:23 PM, Loïc Blot loic.b...@unix-experience.fr wrote: Okay, defer is now enabled on pfsync interface (sorry for my last idea, i haven't the man on me :) ). It seems the problem isn't resolved. The transfer starts but blocked at random time. i have hit this too, despite

Re: PF sync doesn't not work very well

you could try using sloppy states like henning suggested. you'll still get to write stateful rules and get the tcp state machine checks but not the tcp window checks. if it works with sloppy states it narrows the issue down to the pfsync state merge code. at the moment im kind of guessing

Re: 10G NIC recommendation

im using myx(4). im biased though. On 15/08/2013, at 9:09 AM, Diana Eichert deich...@wrench.com wrote: What I want to do. create a netflow collector using OpenBSD by looking at data fed from a tap I know which 10G NICs are supported by OpenBSD, what I'd like to hear is a recommendation

Re: uvm_fault on resume with athn(4)

hey josh, this should be fixed in src/sys/dev/pci/if_athn_pci.c r1.13. sorry for the inconvenience, but thank you for the report, especially the backtrace. cheers, dlg On 23 November 2013 16:37, Josh Grosse j...@jggimi.homeip.net wrote: Summary: with src/sys/dev/pci/if_athn_pci.c at

Re: 'newer' Qlogic HBA support on amd64

hey pete, could you try enabling the emc driver too? cheers, dlg On 16 May 2014, at 7:47 pm, Pete Vickers peter.vick...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Sorry for the delay. I finally upgraded the box (very quick and easy process - nice ) and the HBA is now attached by the qle driver. However whilst

Re: Broadcom BCM5709 and BCM57711 driver features

On 24 Jul 2014, at 19:37, def d...@fromru.com wrote: Hi! Currently using 5.5-stable and It seems (as per hwfeatures) that driver for BCM 5709 (1GE dual port adapter) doesnt support jumbo frames at all which is critical for activation mpls on bnx. The card supports jumbo itself. Return

Re: 5.5 panic in ffs_blkfree

you can go show panic in ddb if you werent watching the console for the panic string. On 25 Aug 2014, at 4:39 am, Roger Hammerstein cheek...@live.com wrote: sorry, i could not get the panic string ddb{3} trace Debugger() at Debugger+0x5 panic() at panic+0xee ffs_blkfree() at

Re: Periodic DNS resolution

i run some scripts out of cron (and from rc.local on boot) to keep some tables in sync with DNS. the scripts are perl so i can use Net::DNS, but apart from that its been pretty robust and straightforward. dlg On 29 Sep 2014, at 11:44, Austin Gilbert austin.gilb...@gmail.com wrote: A problem

Re: Making tftp download large files from tftpd

your diff got stripped when sending to this list. i did a fix which has now been committed to the tree as src/usr.bin/tftp/tftp.c r1.24. thanks for the report :) dlg On 21 Oct 2014, at 10:28, Justin Mayes jma...@careered.com wrote: I could. My original problem was with cisco rommon

Re: bridge + vlan broke after 5.5 5.6 upgrade

On 4 Nov 2014, at 06:41, Pieter Verberne pieterverbe...@xs4all.nl wrote: On 2014-11-02 13:51, Jorge Schrauwen wrote: Hey All, TL;DR: traffic leaving a bridge over a vlan does not get tagged but leaves untagged after upgrade. Is this by design? Looks exactly like my problem. Running 5.6

Re: Dell R630 high interrupts on acpi0

On 16 Dec 2014, at 15:16, Jonathan Matthew jonat...@d14n.org wrote: On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 06:22:37PM +0100, Hrvoje Popovski wrote: Hi all, I have got two new Dell R630 and have current on them from Sun Dec 14 15:07:17. Installation went great and very fast. The problem is that I see

Re: ixgbe_tx_ctx_setup crash

On 27 Dec 2014, at 6:09 pm, Kapetanakis Giannis bil...@edu.physics.uoc.gr wrote: On 27/12/14 10:05, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote: On 26/12/14 12:23, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote: Hi, Any ideas on this? I'm getting at least one panic every day. G On 24/12/14 06:13, Kapetanakis Giannis

Re: ixgbe_tx_ctx_setup crash

On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 08:00:57PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote: On 27 Dec 2014, at 6:09 pm, Kapetanakis Giannis bil...@edu.physics.uoc.gr wrote: On 27/12/14 10:05, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote: On 26/12/14 12:23, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote: Hi, Any ideas on this? I'm getting

Re: YP Alternative

On 2 Jan 2015, at 9:52 pm, Brian Empson br...@teamhandbanana.com wrote: I'm looking into a way to sync up group and user information across a network of OpenBSD machines. I like YP, except that I don't need the password hashes transferred across the network. I like that it's built right

Re: YP Alternative

auth with http, but the solarish things i run almost certainly dont. however, linux and solaris still support krb5 auth out of the box, so its only a problem i really have to solve on openbsd. or use ldap auth. On 1/4/2015 2:26 AM, David Gwynne wrote: On 2 Jan 2015, at 9:52 pm, Brian Empson

Re: YP Alternative

On 5 Jan 2015, at 06:14, Jiri B ji...@devio.us wrote: On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 06:40:09PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote: i dunno. ideally i would just do basic auth over https against something that just returns 200 or 403. bsdauth on openbsd means i could probably implement that with a crappy

Re: Not Detecting Broadcom NetXtreme II 10GBase-T adapter

i havent written a driver for it yet. On 10 Mar 2015, at 10:07 pm, Ninad Shaha ninadsh...@iitb.ac.in wrote: Dear All, I have installed OpenBSD 5.6 on IBM X3650 M4 server. This server contains 2 numbers of Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM57712 10GBase-T dual port adapter. This adapter is not

Re: Emulate apache mod_rewrite feature with new httpd

On 22 Feb 2015, at 20:23, Romain FABBRI romain.fab...@alienconsulting.net wrote: I've managed to configure the new httpd server to use as a replacement for apache. (With is really great. Thanks to Reyk !) I'm strugling to make my drupal site work, because of the clean url module. I

Re: Dell S300 controller

On 8 May 2015, at 12:41 pm, Jim Giannoules j...@devio.us wrote: On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 06:54:37PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2015-05-05, Jack Peirce jpei...@sourcecode.com wrote: On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 08:22:28PM -0400, Steve Shockley wrote: Does anyone know if the Dell PERC S300

Re: em(4) watchdog timeouts

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:18:51AM -0500, Sonic wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Gregor Best wrote: > > I've done some further testing and I think I've narrowed it down to the > > "Unlocking em(4) a bit further"-patch [0]. could you try this? its not written with the

Re: Chelsio T4 10g adapters support ?

> On 10 Dec 2015, at 12:28, Brendan Horan wrote: > > Hi, > > I am looking at building a system running OpenBSD to deal with 10g networks. > > It would seem there is good support for Intel cards via the "ix" driver. > However I was looking at Chelsio cards. > It seems

Re: authentication infra structure

> On 10 Dec 2015, at 5:25 AM, Friedrich Locke wrote: > > If you had about 10k users and 5k machine how would you manage > authenticating issues? Keep in mind that this is a very heterogenous > environment with ldap, ftp, smtp, pop3, traditional unix boxes etc we

Re: PF: can't make queueing and priority work as expected

> On 11 Jan 2016, at 22:43, Daniel Melameth wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Marko Cupać wrote: >> On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 11:11:27 -0700 >> Daniel Melameth wrote: >>> You NEED to set a max on your ROOT queues. >> I came to

Re: PF: can't make queueing and priority work as expected

> On 15 Jan 2016, at 9:07 PM, Craig Skinner <skin...@britvault.co.uk> wrote: > > On 2016-01-15 Fri 12:53 PM |, David Gwynne wrote: >>> On 13 Jan 2016, at 19:19, Marko Cupa?? <marko.cu...@mimar.rs> wrote: >>> >>> Have we come to conclusion that cur

Re: PF: can't make queueing and priority work as expected

> On 13 Jan 2016, at 19:19, Marko Cupać <marko.cu...@mimar.rs> wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 16:40:58 +0100 > Claudio Jeker <cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 05:33:06AM -0700, Daniel Melameth wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at

Re: Gif tunnel / pf / queueing

> On 2 Mar 2016, at 1:51 AM, Christopher Sean Hilton wrote: > > I would like to apply queueing to packets traversing a gif tunnel. I'd > like to know what works better, Tagging outbound packets on the gif > interface and applying them to queues by tag when they leave on the >

Re: NVM Express (NVMe) support status

> On 12 Feb 2016, at 7:01 PM, Evgeniy Sudyr wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm looking status of NVM Express support in -current (got Intel 750 > consumer device > https://www-ssl.intel.com/content/www/us/en/solid-state-drives/solid-state-dr ives-750-series.html > for home desktop,

Re: Per-device multiqueuing would be fantastic. Are there any plans? Are donations a matter here?

> On 9 Feb 2017, at 12:42 pm, Mikael wrote: > > Hi misc@, > > The SSD reading benchmark in the previous email shows that per-device > multiqueuing will boost multithreaded random read performance very much > e.g. by ~7X+, e.g. the current 50MB/sec will increase to

Re: Per-device multiqueuing would be fantastic. Are there any plans? Are donations a matter here?

> On 9 Feb 2017, at 7:11 pm, Mikael <mikael.ml...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2017-02-09 16:41 GMT+08:00 David Gwynne <da...@gwynne.id.au>: > .. > hey mikael, > > can you be more specific about what you mean by multiqueuing for disks? even a > reference to an implem

Re: Does CARP need Layer 2 ?

> On 18 Apr 2017, at 03:54, Bob Jones > wrote: > > Hi, > > Looking at the docs, unlike pfsync, sasyncd and everything else, you > seem to be unable to define a "different" interface to CARP for the > purposes of monitoring. Everything seems to need

Re: SCSI Enclosure Service

hey jens, from what i can tell, you talk to the ami mg9071 chips on that enclosure using sgpio, not in band using smp (sas mgmt protocol) or ses as a scsi device. i get the impression that mpii hardware does have some understanding of enclosures connected via sgpio, but i'm not sure what

Re: re0 and re1 watchdog timeouts, and system freeze

On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 07:19:34PM +0200, Bj??rn Ketelaars wrote: > On Fri 09/06/2017 12:07, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > On 08/06/17(Thu) 20:38, Bj??rn Ketelaars wrote: > > > On Thu 08/06/2017 16:55, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > > > On 07/06/17(Wed) 09:43, Bj??rn Ketelaars wrote: > > > > > On Sat

Re: SNMP reporting on VXLAN interfaces

On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 10:51:25AM +1000, Jason Tubnor wrote: > Hi, > > Not sure if anyone else here is using SNMP for obtaining VXLAN(4) adapter > throughput but after some testing (clamping with PF queues), I have > discovered that throughput on VXLAN interfaces via SNMP are reporting > exactly

Re: gif(4) changes vs tunnelbroker

> On 1 Mar 2018, at 02:22, Andreas Bartelt <o...@bartula.de> wrote: > > On 02/27/18 22:35, Pavel Korovin wrote: >> On 02/28, David Gwynne wrote: >>> what is the status of sysctl net.inet.ipip ? >> David, thank you! That was easy :) >> Sorry for

Re: OSPF over gif on top of IPsec transport -current

> On 11 Mar 2018, at 05:30, Atanas Vladimirov wrote: > > On 2018-03-10 00:01, Remi Locherer wrote: >>> >> With below diff the setup works as expected: tcpdump shows OSPF hellos >> on gif0 and ospfd sees the neighbour. >> I don't think it's the correct fix though. >> Index:

Re: OSPF over gif on top of IPsec transport -current

> On 10 Mar 2018, at 08:01, Remi Locherer wrote: > > > With below diff the setup works as expected: tcpdump shows OSPF hellos > on gif0 and ospfd sees the neighbour. > > I don't think it's the correct fix though. functionally it is the correct fix. when i reworked

Re: gif(4) changes vs tunnelbroker

> On 27 Feb 2018, at 4:10 am, Pavel Korovin wrote: > > Dear all, > > After upgrading several hosts to -current I noticed that all my IPv6 tunnels > via tunnelbroker stopped working. Recently introduced changes to gif(4) > (since > late December 2017) are too complex for me

Re: Trouble forwarding between mpw's in bridge (6.4)

> On 2 Apr 2019, at 6:41 pm, Mitchell Krome wrote: > > On 2/04/2019 2:08 pm, David Gwynne wrote: >> Can you send me the hostname.* files and the output of ifconfig (showing all >> interfaces)? >> >> You're using -current now, right? >> >&

Re: Trouble forwarding between mpw's in bridge (6.4)

Can you send me the hostname.* files and the output of ifconfig (showing all interfaces)? You're using -current now, right? dlg > On 2 Apr 2019, at 08:15, lnel...@nelnet.org wrote: > > >> Until recently >> (https://github.com/openbsd/src/commit/dc68b945bbc883db108ac48a07bb89 >> 778b75582a)

Re: Trouble forwarding between mpw's in bridge (6.4)

ting router. > > Thank you to everyone!!! > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 4:52 AM Mitchell Krome wrote: >> >> >> >> On 2/04/2019 7:57 pm, Mitchell Krome wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 2/04/2019 7:24 pm, David Gwynne wrote: >>>> >>>&

<    1   2   3   >