> On 16 Dec 2014, at 15:16, Jonathan Matthew wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 06:22:37PM +0100, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have got two new Dell R630 and have current on them from Sun Dec
>> 14 15:07:17. Installation went great and very fast.
>> The problem is that I see around
> On 27 Dec 2014, at 6:09 pm, Kapetanakis Giannis
> wrote:
>
> On 27/12/14 10:05, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
>> On 26/12/14 12:23, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Any ideas on this? I'm getting at least one panic every day.
>>>
>>> G
>>>
>>> On 24/12/14 06:13, Kapetanakis Giannis w
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 08:00:57PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
>
> > On 27 Dec 2014, at 6:09 pm, Kapetanakis Giannis
> > wrote:
> >
> > On 27/12/14 10:05, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
> >> On 26/12/14 12:23, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
> >>> Hi,
>
> On 2 Jan 2015, at 9:52 pm, Brian Empson wrote:
>
> I'm looking into a way to sync up group and user information across a network
> of OpenBSD machines. I like YP, except that I don't need the password hashes
> transferred across the network. I like that it's built right into the base
> insta
ld use to
do auth with http, but the solarish things i run almost certainly dont.
however, linux and solaris still support krb5 auth out of the box, so its only
a problem i really have to solve on openbsd. or use ldap auth.
>
> On 1/4/2015 2:26 AM, David Gwynne wrote:
>>> On
> On 5 Jan 2015, at 06:14, Jiri B wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 06:40:09PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
>> i dunno. ideally i would just do basic auth over https against something
>> that just returns 200 or 403. bsdauth on openbsd means i could probably
>> i
> On 22 Feb 2015, at 20:23, Romain FABBRI
> wrote:
>
> I've managed to configure the new httpd server to use as a replacement for
> apache. (With is really great. Thanks to Reyk !)
>
> I'm strugling to make my drupal site work, because of the clean url module.
>
> I used to have the followin
i havent written a driver for it yet.
> On 10 Mar 2015, at 10:07 pm, Ninad Shaha wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> I have installed OpenBSD 5.6 on IBM X3650 M4 server. This server
> contains 2 numbers of Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM57712 10GBase-T dual port
> adapter. This adapter is not visible or detec
what are you using the rewrite stuff for?
On 23/02/2013, at 5:45 PM, russell wrote:
> So I am using tftpd -r and my rewrite script works however I am at a
> loss as to the best way to start tftpd.
>
> From my experiments, the rewrite engine has to start before tftpd, tftpd
> expects the sock
On 24/02/2013, at 11:38 AM, russell wrote:
> On 02/24/2013 11:32 PM, David Gwynne wrote:
>> what are you using the rewrite stuff for?
>>
> netbooting.
me too!
we unconditionally netboot all our labs (and most of our staff machines). by
default we want netboot to fall out b
do you have a real serial console hooked up to the machines? more specifically,
can you break into ddb when the machine breaks and get a trace?
i use carp on vlans on lacp trunks on top of myx(4) and em(4) "quite a lot"
without trouble, so its likely to be bge(4) if you ask me. unfortunately tha
> On 8 May 2015, at 12:41 pm, Jim Giannoules wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 06:54:37PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2015-05-05, Jack Peirce wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 08:22:28PM -0400, Steve Shockley wrote:
Does anyone know if the Dell PERC S300 controller will work unde
> On 2 Mar 2016, at 1:51 AM, Christopher Sean Hilton
wrote:
>
> I would like to apply queueing to packets traversing a gif tunnel. I'd
> like to know what works better, Tagging outbound packets on the gif
> interface and applying them to queues by tag when they leave on the
> external interface? O
> On 12 Feb 2016, at 7:01 PM, Evgeniy Sudyr wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking status of NVM Express support in -current (got Intel 750
> consumer device
>
https://www-ssl.intel.com/content/www/us/en/solid-state-drives/solid-state-dr
ives-750-series.html
> for home desktop, but it looks like all d
On 24 Jul 2014, at 19:37, def wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Currently using 5.5-stable and It seems (as per hwfeatures) that driver for
> BCM 5709 (1GE dual port adapter)
> doesnt support jumbo frames at all which is critical for activation mpls on
> bnx.
> The card supports jumbo itself.
> Return invalid
you can go "show panic" in ddb if you werent watching the console for the panic
string.
On 25 Aug 2014, at 4:39 am, Roger Hammerstein wrote:
> sorry, i could not get the panic string
>
> ddb{3}> trace
> Debugger() at Debugger+0x5
> panic() at panic+0xee
> ffs_blkfree() at ffs_blkfree+0x717
> f
i run some scripts out of cron (and from rc.local on boot) to keep some tables
in sync with DNS. the scripts are perl so i can use Net::DNS, but apart from
that its been pretty robust and straightforward.
dlg
On 29 Sep 2014, at 11:44, Austin Gilbert wrote:
> A problem that seems to come up ov
your diff got stripped when sending to this list. i did a fix which has now
been committed to the tree as src/usr.bin/tftp/tftp.c r1.24.
thanks for the report :)
dlg
> On 21 Oct 2014, at 10:28, Justin Mayes wrote:
>
> I could. My original problem was with cisco rommon tftpdnld command as clie
> On 4 Nov 2014, at 06:41, Pieter Verberne wrote:
>
>> On 2014-11-02 13:51, Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
>>> Hey All,
>>> TL;DR: traffic leaving a bridge over a vlan does
>>> not get tagged but leaves untagged after upgrade.
>>> Is this by design?
>> Looks exactly like my problem. Running 5.6 release.
hey josh,
this should be fixed in src/sys/dev/pci/if_athn_pci.c r1.13.
sorry for the inconvenience, but thank you for the report, especially the
backtrace.
cheers,
dlg
On 23 November 2013 16:37, Josh Grosse wrote:
> Summary: with src/sys/dev/pci/if_athn_pci.c at revision 1.12,
> suspend/res
hey pete,
could you try enabling the emc driver too?
cheers,
dlg
On 16 May 2014, at 7:47 pm, Pete Vickers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for the delay. I finally upgraded the box (very quick and easy process
> - nice ) and the HBA is now attached by the qle driver. However whilst it
> 'sees' the SA
On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 07:46:01AM +, Simon Baker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Struggling a bit debugging something, and hoping someone can point me in the
> right direction.
ok. after staring at this for a while im pretty sure it's an actual bug
rather than a misconfiguration.
> I???ve got 4 physical
On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 08:10:44PM +0100, Markus Wipp wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is my first mail to an OpenBSD list, so I hope I chose the correct one.
>
> I???m trying to get a GRE tunnel in combination with pf working a few days now
> on my OpenBSD (OpenBSD 7.0 (GENERIC.MP) #232: Thu Sep 30 14
you've set the net.inet.gre.allow sysctl to 1, right?
> On 16 Jan 2022, at 17:05, Markus Wipp wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> First of all thank you so much taking the time for my question!
>
>> My first impression is that you're confusing where to apply policy to
>> the encapsulated traffic. "pass o
> On 10 Feb 2022, at 18:55, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> Normally if you have two addresses on the same lan you'd configure them
> as aliases on the one interface, this seems a bit of a non-standard
> config.
If aggr/trunk to increase bandwidth makes sense, then you can think of
configuring mu
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 04:55:05PM +, Laura Smith wrote:
> I've never had occasion to use bi-nat before and I'm struggling a little to
> wrap my head around the concept.
>
> The OpenBSD FAQ (https://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/nat.html) gives the following
> example:
>
> "pass on tl0 from $web_s
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 04:37:59PM -0400, Aner Perez wrote:
> I noticed that if I put an "ifname" (or "on") in a fllter expression for
> tcpdump, it will show all traffic that has an ifname that *starts with* the
> name I provided.?? e.g.
>
> # tcpdump -n -l -e -ttt -i pflog0 ifname vlan1
>
> Wil
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 02:34:54PM -0400, Aner Perez wrote:
> On 3/22/22 00:37, David Gwynne wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 04:37:59PM -0400, Aner Perez wrote:
> > > I noticed that if I put an "ifname" (or "on") in a fllter expression for
> > >
loopback interfaces are special and kind of end up representing an rdomain
inside the kernel, which is where this restriction comes from.
dlg
> On 2 Apr 2022, at 09:36, Tom Smyth wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I came across an issue that once a rdomain is set on a
> loopback interface
> you cant
> On 3 Apr 2022, at 21:46, Denis Fondras wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In vxlan(4) manual, we have :
>
> endpoint mode
> When configured without a tunnel destination address, vxlan operates as
> a bridge, but with learning disabled.
>
>
> The question is : is it possible to set tu
It looks like vport0 is down. Add "up" to hostname.vport0 and ifconfig
vport0 up.
On Thu, 12 May 2022 at 15:40, David Demelier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to setup vms using the wonderful vmd and private addresses
> on 10.0.0.0 range. Following the various entries in the FAQ (faq16) and
> the
> On 10 Aug 2024, at 18:18, 04-psyche.tot...@icloud.com wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am working on a wireguard network.
>
> I have a setup like this:
>
> serverA (10.0.0.0) => serverB (10.0.0.1) => serverC (10.0.0.2)
>
> - serverA connects to serverB with AllowedIPs = 0.0.0.0/0
> - serverB conn
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 12:25:35PM -0700, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
> I am attempting to build a proof of concept of how to use vxlan(4) on OpenBSD
> in a fully meshed OSPF network with [wireless] links between sites under my
> full control so mtu is not an issue (mtu 1550 for vxlan0 and mtu 1600 o
On 10/07/2009, at 11:37 AM, Vijay Sankar wrote:
Hi,
I have a Dell PE2950 server with DRAC 5 running OpenBSD 4.5 AMD64. I
would like to remotely access the console using an SSH session to
the DRAC IP address. I am hoping someone can help me with this.
This is what I have so far.
On the Se
did not work either.
Is there something I should do in /etc/ttys ?
Thanks again,
Vijay
David Gwynne wrote:
On 10/07/2009, at 11:37 AM, Vijay Sankar wrote:
Hi,
I have a Dell PE2950 server with DRAC 5 running OpenBSD 4.5 AMD64.
I would like to remotely access the console using an SSH session
to
On 22/12/2011, at 6:20 PM, PP;Q Q P(P8P?P8QP8P= wrote:
> am I right that OpenBSD does NOT use device polling like FreeBSD or
> Linux (called "NAPI") do ?
yes.
> any router (even at 10G rate) will perfectly work without polling ?
my understanding is that polling is to limit/cap the amount of
From looking at the lsi site and the driver names it ships on these
model controllers, it looks like these nics are really mpi(4) based
with a driver that does software raid on top of it. Way to sully the
MegaRAID name LSI...
Anyway, I think you're going to have to move up from the "value" line
o
On 14/11/2007, at 8:11 PM, Richard Wilson wrote:
I have been pondering for some time getting a new core router, and a
recent question on HP Procurves vs Soekris boxes has kicked me into
thought. I have some more general questions:
I recall hearing tell (on here I think) that amd64 is a better a
Hi,
are you trying to use the subversion port, are you trying to roll
your own?
dlg
On 13/11/2007, at 3:14 PM, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:49:08 -0600
Duncan Patton a Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Howdy?
I'm trying to install mod_dav_svn and mod_authz_sv
On 27/11/2007, at 7:59 AM, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Hi,
Please correct me if my understanding is wrong. I am trying to trace
a bug and I am not sure where it is really, but I got a possible
idea I want to check for if that make sense.
My understanding's is that all drives are using an abstra
dual booting is having two kernels. bsd and bsd.working.
On 27/11/2007, at 2:14 AM, Artur Grabowski wrote:
frantisek holop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
but can't call yerself a unix guru if havent fu*ed up
dual boot at least once :]
never fucked up a dual boot. Only tried it two times and bo
this diff cannot affect the behavior of your system. the code below
deals with domain validation on SPI mpi variants while the x4100 uses
SAS mpi. the code you patched isnt run on your machine.
do you have these crashes on all x4100s running amd64 mp, or only on
this one machine?
dlg
On
On 29/11/2007, at 4:51 AM, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
David Gwynne wrote:
this diff cannot affect the behavior of your system. the code below
deals with domain validation on SPI mpi variants while the x4100
uses SAS mpi. the code you patched isnt run on your machine.
Not sure I understand your
On 04/02/2008, at 8:13 PM, Lars Noodin wrote:
Luca Dell'Oca wrote:
I would like to authenticate user and password of users in an Active
Directory
No. You wouldn't.
pretty sure he would. it's useful.
On 14/02/2007, at 9:59 PM, Jose Fragoso wrote:
Hi,
I just installed OpenBSD 4.0 on an IBM xSeries 336. I have noticed
that, for
some reason,
I/O operations are not carried out as fast as one would expect for
a machine
with SCSI
disks. For instance, the creation of a 50GB partion took a re
can i see a dmesg as well? if you're running the machine as an amd64,
can you try it again as an i386?
dlg
On 15/02/2007, at 3:38 AM, Jose Fragoso wrote:
thats very... vague...
Sorry. I agree.
where are you creating this 50G partitiong? in the installer, or in
the installed operating sys
On 05/03/2007, at 6:04 AM, j sidabras wrote:
Hello All,
I know promise hasn't been the most forthcoming company when releasing
specifications for their hardware. But it seems the first hardware
docs for
the promise SX4 (PDC20621) have been released:
http://gkernel.sourceforge.net/specs/prom
and
reboot, everything will be ok.
If it isn't ok, then email me ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and Chris Pascoe
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) with a bug report and we'll have a look at it.
dlg
- Forwarded message from David Gwynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 01:31:15 -0600 (MDT)
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 05:44:12PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> As the commit message says, be careful if you're following -current and
> you have a recent sata controller. There's a chance it will claim to be
> supported by ahci(4), which means your disks will change their n
On 31/03/2007, at 8:16 AM, Bryan Irvine wrote:
This might be a little off-topic, but I can't find the answer
anywhere.
Since the LSI logic sata 150-4 cards need to be configured via the
cards bios (at bootup on i386) I can't figure out if there is a way
to configure a RAID when using a sparc
yeah, this is akward...
i guess i should plug my mpi in again.
On 05/04/2007, at 2:50 AM, Thierry Lacoste wrote:
On Wednesday 04 April 2007 17:37, Chris Black wrote:
Thierry Lacoste wrote:
I installed OpenBSD on a Dell PowerEdge with
a raid1 array controlled by a SAS 5iR controller
thanks to
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 08:20:07AM +0200, Vim Visual wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not concerned about the library, I'm almost sure it'll work in
> OpenBSD -it was written to be very portable-; it's the raid controller
> what will finally be the key to the OS... I forgot to give details,
> sorry. It's an A
someone just sent me some cash via paypal, so i just bought myself a
cx4 cable. hopefully we'll see some packets moving on the tehuti
network cards in the next week or so.
thanks guys,
dlg
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 11:36:28AM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> hi,
>
> dlg and me started working on drive
intel provide both pciide and ahci for using sata disks. which one
gets used depends on a set of registers in the pci config space.
if you're serious about getting this to work find the datasheet at
developer.intel.com for this chipset, and look at the MAP and PCS
registers (i think thats t
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 07:15:31PM +0200, Artur Grabowski wrote:
> David Gwynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > intel provide both pciide and ahci for using sata disks. which one
> > gets used depends on a set of registers in the pci config space.
> >
> >
Chris Pascoe (pascoe@) and I (dlg@) have been working on improving ATA
support in OpenBSD recently. We'd like to fix the SATA support on
Apple's G5 machines, but we actually need one to be able to do that.
If you can help by getting us a G5 Xserve in Brisbane, Australia,
please email me via this a
im getting to the point where there's no challenge left in writing
device drivers, i want to move onto something new. so after i finish
making the pile of controllers on my desk work, the thing i'd like to
do the most is port openbsd to a new architecture, specifically
itanium.
to do that work tho
talking to the firmware relies on working interrupts, it sounds like
theyre not wired up properly. does the problem occur on a
uniprocessor kernel? can you enable acpi and try?
dlg
On 09/06/2007, at 7:09 PM, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
I am having Trouble with a *Areca* 1200 series RAID card,
W
lp
> Sam Fourman Jr.
>
>On 6/10/07, David Gwynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> talking to the firmware relies on working interrupts, it sounds
> like
> theyre not wired up properly. does the problem occur on a
> uniprocessor kernel? can
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 01:45:45PM -0500, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
>
>here is a dmesg from 4.1 RELEASE, and the Raid set is fine, everything
>works.
told ya :)
> penBSD 4.1 (GENERIC.MP) #1225: Sat Mar 10 19:23:18 MST 2007
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
>
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 06:34:18AM -0600, Diana Eichert wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Diana Eichert wrote:
>
> >Sad, well I'll throw US$100 into the mix if someone wants to
> >co-ordinate it. I don't have any use for Itanium, but I do know that
> >dlg@ has done some great work, so I might as well
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 10:47:55AM -0400, Charlie Farinella wrote:
> Our company has purchased 3 of these servers, and I would like very much
> to get the onboard nic working on at least one of them.
>
> I have installed OpenBSD 4.1 and it seems to recognize the interface
> correctly and use t
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 12:29:51PM +0100, Nick Humphrey wrote:
> I am having trouble with installing OpenBSD 4.1 on a new amd64 server
> with an Areca ARC-1210 raid card. When I boot from the 4.1 CD install
> media, everything seems fine up until it reaches" rd0: fixed,
> blocks" and then the
can you try a snapshot bsd.rd?
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 11:33:34PM +0100, Nick Humphrey wrote:
> David Gwynne wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 12:29:51PM +0100, Nick Humphrey wrote:
> >> I am having trouble with installing OpenBSD 4.1 on a new amd64 server
> >> with
to help though, im just glad you got
it working.
>
>On 7/19/07, David Gwynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> can you try a snapshot bsd.rd?
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 11:33:34PM +0100, Nick Humphrey wrote:
> > David Gwynne wrote:
> > &
On 25/08/2007, at 8:56 AM, Marcos Laufer wrote:
Hello list,
I installed the latest snapshot on an Intel D945GCcr mobo
which supports SATA-300 (sata2) , plugged in some hard
disks, all of them Western Digital WD3200AAKS,
wich according to WD website those work at 300 mb/s.
(http://www.westerndig
On 21/09/2007, at 11:09 AM, Josh wrote:
Hello there.
We have a bunch of obsd firewalls, 8 at the moment, all working
nice and so forth. But we
need to add about another 4 in there for new connections and
networks, which means more
machines to find room for.
So basically I have been asked
On 23/09/2007, at 3:38 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
The problem of Linux as a whole is that it tries to resolve security
problems not by auditing code but by implementing SELinux.
That is a really interesting statement.
But what
the problem would be if OpenBSD has "SeBSD" extension? It's just
On 27/09/2007, at 8:06 PM, Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
A new server shippped by a local vendor fails to boot bsd.mp, with
and without acpi enabled (amd64, 4.2). Without acpi it will reboot
directly after mounting the root device. With acpi enabled it will
hang with "arc0: unable to query fir
have you tried the vmxnet interfaces supported by the vic driver?
there's a couple of bugfixes in vic after 4.1 that you might want
though.
dlg
On 02/10/2007, at 5:50 PM, Christian Plattner wrote:
Dear all,
I am seeking for people that run OpenBSD 4.1 on ESX servers and
want to share th
fantastic, good to know :)
yay kettenis
dlg
On 15/10/2007, at 7:52 PM, Stephan A. Rickauer wrote:
For the archives: Mark has sent me a patch which fixes the problem
(also in the tree now).
Thanks for this awesome support (once more)!
Stephan
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 04:20:27PM +0200, Mark
Hi guys,
There's been a lot of progress recently in relation to SCSI, RAID,
and bio support for several controllers. However, all of them have
been made by LSI Logic. We'd like to balance this out a bit by
working on another popular RAID controller, specifically the Smart
ARRAY controller
On 06/06/2006, at 2:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have been looking high and low for instructions on how to get 3.9
running on an x4100. Not finding any, I decided to play w/ it
myself. I
was able to make it work. While I have included the entire dmesg,
here is
the interesting
About 6 weeks ago we added mpi(4) to the tree to work on it as a
replacement for mpt(4) to address several issues with the older
driver. Over that period we tested and enabled it on all the
architectures we could plug it into and kept developing the missing
features that mpt had over mpi. A
On 22/08/2006, at 10:17 AM, Robert Urban wrote:
Hi Folks,
using a simple test program to write sequential blocks to a file,
optionally
opening with O_SYNC, I've tested write performance to a MegaRAID
logical
drive consisting of a RAID-5 set of 4 72GB HP Ultra320 disks and to
a RAID-0
dri
On 24/08/2006, at 7:39 PM, Jonas Thambert wrote:
Hello list,
I'm having problem upgrading a 3.8 stable to 3.9 stable. The server is
a Prolian dl380 g2 with a LSI MegaRAID 320-1. When booting the
CD it stops right after ami driver is loaded:
can you try a snapshot and see if the problem still
On 26/08/2006, at 5:05 AM, Matt Kolb wrote:
stan writes:
I've got a bunch of Sun 2100 machines. Nice machine that i plan on
doing a
number of things with. I'd prefer to use OpenBSD on them for
firewalls, and
other network related tasks. I've got 2 x 250G drives in these
machines, and want
hi,
can you please try this diff and see if it solves your panics?
Index: if_em.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/if_em.c,v
retrieving revision 1.199
diff -u -p -r1.199 if_em.c
--- if_em.c 29 Nov 2008 10:23:29 - 1.199
On 02/12/2008, at 15:51, "Insan Praja SW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:17:42 +0700, David Gwynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
hi,
can you please try this diff and see if it solves your panics?
Hi David and Misc@,
I already use the rev1.199 sour
On 02/12/2008, at 11:11 PM, Insan Praja SW wrote:
On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:17:42 +0700, David Gwynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi,
Here the dmesg attach after compiling the source. It works just fine
but I
can't change em(4) MTU over 1600.
thanks for testing the diff.
n
some ssd drives would be very cool to try. id love to play with
these: http://www.stec-inc.com/product/zeusiops.php
dlg
On 15/04/2008, at 9:52 AM, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
am considering acquiring some machines with SSD drives, e.g.
thinkpad X300, and was interested to hear about any experie
On 17/04/2008, at 12:28 AM, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
David Gwynne wrote:
some ssd drives would be very cool to try. id love to play with
these: http://www.stec-inc.com/product/zeusiops.php
am i right in saying these STEC drives are 10K USD each? yikes
i dont know. i try to avoid pricing
On 21/04/2008, at 4:46 AM, Matthew Weigel wrote:
Chris Zakelj wrote:
a non-issue on 64-bit platforms
Whether a system is 64-bit or not isn't very relevant to this -
that mostly establishes what the memory address space is, *not* the
size of integers that can be used by the system.
solar
On 21/04/2008, at 1:53 PM, Matthew Weigel wrote:
David Gwynne wrote:
solaris suffers from this problem. you cant use big disks with
32bit solaris kernels.
For UFS, at least, but doesn't ZFS on i386 (not amd64) scale?
this is a block layer problem, nothing to do with the filesystem
copy con program.exe
i believe this has been fixed with revision 1.80 of src/sys/dev/ic/
mfi.c. could you please try -current (or at least 4.3) and see if the
problem persists?
dlg
On 14/05/2008, at 1:10 AM, Claer wrote:
Hi list,
Today one of our first Dell 1950 crashed in a strange way. I asked non
IT people
On 29/09/2006, at 11:09 PM, Francois Slabbert wrote:
hi misc,
i'm looking to purchase a sata raid controller, and have
shortlisted it down to two models for no particular reason other
than the controllers being supported by openbsd, being
'afordable',compatible with the equipment i alread
On 04/11/2006, at 9:09 AM, Robert George Ababurko wrote:
I am just getting back into using OpenBSDI see that 4.0 has
more support
for the Areca SATA RAID cards, but do ot list them in the supported
devices
list. It just has a note showong 4.0 features.
That said, when installing 4.0 on
On 06/12/2006, at 12:33 PM, Gustavo Rios wrote:
Dear friends,
i tried to figure it out whether DELL SAS 5iR is supported by openbsd
4.0 on i386 in the openbsd site, but i could not see! I wonder, if it
is not supported, if there are plans to support it ?
I'm so sure this hardware is supported
From: "Gary Clemans-Gibbon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks for your reply Tim. If anything it makes me feel worse. I was
hoping it was something easily fixed.
I just tried transferring a 50 Mb file to the OBSD samba box from win
using SCP. Again very slow writes but much faster reads. The 50 Mb f
aac is still not built as part of openbsd for the same reasons it was
disabled: we cant support it without documentation.
to use the raid controller you're going to have to build custom
kernels (and maybe custom install images) with aac enabled. or you
can disable the raid controller in the
On 07/03/2006, at 6:53 AM, Openbsd User wrote:
> > What does "bioctl ami0" say (assuming you have at least 3.8,
next time
> > post a complete dmesg!).
>
> $ sudo bioctl ami0
> Volume Status Size Device
> ami0 0 Online 146695782400 sd0 RAID1
> 0 Online 146811
your two physical disks are hidden by the raid controller. from your
other posts its obvious theyre showing up as one logical disk.
bioctl ami0 will find your "missing" disks.
dlg
On 07/03/2006, at 5:05 AM, Openbsd User wrote:
opps, I forgot to post the entire dmesg. (Thanks Steve!)
OpenBS
i hope you mean cardbus and not pcmcia. there is such a thing as a
pcmcia usb host controller, but it is usb 1 only, and we don't have a
driver for it. if someone wants to give me one i might work on that
in the future though (i want usb on my sparc).
as for usb2 carbus controllers, anythin
definitive answer: replace the disk.
On 19/04/2006, at 1:04 PM, patrick ~ wrote:
Hi,
This is the second time I've been seeing this type of
an error:
Mar 27 01:30:47 box /bsd: wd0f: reading fsbn 3967732 of
3967732-3967735 (wd0
bn 9723412; cn 9646 tn 3 sn 55), retrying
Mar 27 01:30:48 box
I committed a change this morning that should cause a misuses of a
kernel api to generate panics rather than weird side effects. If
anyone gets a panic with the message "timeout_set: already queued"
can you submit a bug report via bugs@ or sendbug as soon as possible.
I know I shouldn't hav
have you submitted a bug report?
On 18/04/2006, at 11:00 PM, Jared Solomon wrote:
Erm, that's not true. I picked up one at Beelzebub Buy and it crashes
my openBSD 3.8 machine.
On 4/17/06, David Gwynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i hope you mean cardbus and not pcmcia. there is s
what driver is behind these sensor values?
can you post a full dmesg and sysctl hw.sensors when everything is
running ok?
thanks,
dlg
On 15/05/2006, at 5:28 AM, Tor Houghton wrote:
List,
This may sound daft, but the man pages don't appear to mention it.
I have a
box that sometime gives
On 09/09/2005, at 5:07 PM, Roger Neth Jr wrote:
Hello List,
I don't know how to have ppp pppoe stay on one tun as it is switching
between tun0 and tun1 on reboots.
andrew# page rc.conf.local
config de1 up
ppp -ddial pppoe
you want to use the -unit argument to ppp to bind it to a particu
From: "Theo de Raadt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I thought it was time to give some details about the (minimal) RAID
management stuff coming in OpenBSD 3.8. Most of this code has been
written by Marco Peereboom with some help from David Gwynne and
Michael Shalayeff. Moral support an
101 - 200 of 291 matches
Mail list logo
