Hi there,
We know that normally Mysql is good at controlling memory usage but the
problem we are seeing is a bit suspicious. I want to ask for help to see
whether somebody can help on debugging the issue. Feel free to let me know
if there are more details needed.
The databases we have are all
> From: Lucio Chiappetti
>
> On Tue, 7 Apr 2015, shawn l.green wrote:
>
>> The advantage to using temporary tables is that they can have indexes on
>> them. You can create the indexes when you create the table or you can ALTER
>> the table later to add them.
>
> if they are big, using proper
On Tue, 7 Apr 2015, shawn l.green wrote:
Temporary tables are going to become your very good friends.
yes I do use temporary tables a lot
The advantage to using temporary tables is that they can have indexes on
them. You can create the indexes when you create the table or you can
ALTER the
On 4/7/2015 4:12 PM, Rajeev Prasad wrote:
hello Masters,
I am a novice, and I am wanting to know how to achieve this:
1million plus row in a table.
user runs a search, gets some results. I want to store this result in memory in
a way, so that user can fire more SQL searches on this result
W dniu 07.04.2015 o 22:12, Rajeev Prasad pisze:
1million plus row in a table.
user runs a search, gets some results.
MySQL comes with query-cache, once you run your SELECT statement the
results are kept in memory. Try it by running big query and then rerun
it, the second time it will take
hello Masters,
I am a novice, and I am wanting to know how to achieve this:
1million plus row in a table.
user runs a search, gets some results. I want to store this result in memory in
a way, so that user can fire more SQL searches on this result. How is this
done? I want this to go atleast
Memory leaks are unlikely, but possible. Upgrade to a newer version.
Killing threads that say "Sleep" _may_ free up some memory, but unlikely to be
more than even 1MB each. It _may_ cause grief for the developers, if they
haven't bulletproofed their code enough to handle &
19.04.2013 23:39, Ilya Kazakevich:
Try to use "tuning-primer.sh": this scripts reads your variables and prints
memory size you need for that.
I tried that. The results are inconspicious:
MEMORY USAGE
Max Memory Ever Allocated : 5.27 G
Configured Max Per-thread Buffers : 1.92 G
y be as easy as adding an index or turning a
subquery into a JOIN.
Granted, that would not help to nail down the suspected memory leak.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ilya Kazakevich [mailto:ilya.kazakev...@jetbrains.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 2:40 PM
> To: 'Den
Hello,
Try to use "tuning-primer.sh": this scripts reads your variables and prints
memory size you need for that.
Here is example of its output:
MEMORY USAGE
Max Memory Ever Allocated : 2.86 G
Configured Max Per-thread Buffers : 1.80 G
Configured Max Global Buffers : 2.10 G
Conf
Hi all.
In a specific MySQL installation of 5.6.10 using InnoDB tables, I
am observing unusual memory consumption patterns. The memory
usage is growing constantly - even beyond the physical memory
limits. The entire on-disk storage is 41 GB (uncompressed), yet
memory usage is happily growing
above are probably enough for me to make a concrete recommendation.
High Memory -->
High is good, Swapping is _terrible_.
Tuning: http://mysql.rjweb.org/doc.php/memory
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon K [mailto:k_simo...@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 10:15
e are no silver bullets here
except using the blackhole storage engine for all tables (joke) .
Andrew
On 20 Sep 2012 18:15, "Simon K" wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am using HP-UX box.
>
> I am having problem with mysqld daemon , it is eating too much of
> processor and memo
Hello everyone.
Today I restarted a server and got this at the log file:
InnoDB: The InnoDB memory heap is disabled
I read a little (maybe to little) about and it says something about the
native use of malloc.
The system is a linux
Linux 2.6.34.7-0.7 #1 SMP PREEMPT 2010-12-13 11:13:53 +0100
M, Charles Cazabon <
charlesc-mysql@pyropus.ca> wrote:
> Johnny Withers wrote:
>
> > I hope someone can help me out here. I'm having trouble with some new
> > servers and memory allocation.
> >
> > Some basic specs on the servers:
> > 32GB
Johnny Withers wrote:
> I hope someone can help me out here. I'm having trouble with some new
> servers and memory allocation.
>
> Some basic specs on the servers:
> 32GB total mem
> 2GB swap
> 64-bit RHEL
> 64-bit mysqld
> overcommit_memory=2
&g
Dear all,
I found the solution:
1.
If you want to use the shared memory protocol
locally on windows
a.
Stop the TCP/IP protocol by adding –skip-networking
in my.ini file.
b.
Add the shared memory protocol by adding –shared-memory
in my.ini file.
c.
Both should be
| 0
+-+---
278 rows in set (0.00 sec)mysql> Actually, shared memory and nt pipes are
protocols can be used locally with windows. But TCP can be used locally and
remotely with windows. Thanks.SIVASUTHAN. Date: Sat, 14 Apr
Red carpet for you Using shared memory! last one was Monty while
developing MySQL 3.x!!!
Sorry Siva,
A bit of fun about MySQL on windows shared-memory protocol :)
I have no experience on Shared Memory protocol and as me I think 99.999% of
MySQL users.
I think it would be way more appropriate
On 02/28/2012 03:34 PM, Shafi AHMED wrote:
pls assist
- please give more information (OS, ...)
- you can search the web with
-- "ulimit more memory"
-- "mysql you-os increase memory"
-- "mysql you-os increase memory ulimit"
-- "mysql configuration memory&
Dear All,
I am getting below errors intermittently..
this is "all of a sudden " messages where the queries generated causing the
prob...memory seems to be fine.
pls assist
[28-Feb-2012 15:54:05] MySQL error 1041: Out of memory; Check if mysqld or
some other process uses all availa
>-Original Message-
>From: Andrés Tello [mailto:mr.crip...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 10:24 AM
>To: Mailing-List mysql
>Subject: Memory Usage.
>
>How can I know how memory is being used by Mysql?
>
>I have 32GB Ram, but I can't make mysql to u
Am 25.04.2011 16:24, schrieb Andrés Tello:
> How can I know how memory is being used by Mysql?
>
> I have 32GB Ram, but I can't make mysql to use more than 12GB Ram , and even
> that I have tables over 40GB...
>
> Thanks! xD
depends on storage-engine (myisam or innodb)
How can I know how memory is being used by Mysql?
I have 32GB Ram, but I can't make mysql to use more than 12GB Ram , and even
that I have tables over 40GB...
Thanks! xD
I hope someone can help me out here. I'm having trouble with some new
servers and memory allocation.
Some basic specs on the servers:
32GB total mem
2GB swap
64-bit RHEL
64-bit mysqld
overcommit_memory=2
mysql fails to start with 14GB innodb_buffer_pool_size
mysql will start with 12GB b
What particular overhead is growing ? :-)
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Geoff Galitz wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> We have a table using the memory engine and we notice in PMA that the
> overhead continues grow over time. Normally we'd optimize with such an
> issue but th
Hello.
We have a table using the memory engine and we notice in PMA that the overhead
continues grow over time. Normally we'd optimize with such an issue but that
is not applicable to memory based tables. So... does this pose a problem for
long term use of the table? If so, is th
Hi Kevin,
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Kevin Spencer wrote:
> When you use a leading wildcard symbol, MySQL will do a full table
> scan regardless of any indexes you've created.
>
Is it also apply to regex lookup ?
Regards,
Feris
2011/2/3 Yannis Haralambous :
>
> what am I doing wrong?
>
> the query was just
>
> SELECT * FROM wasfoundin WHERE yakoright LIKE '%geography%'
When you use a leading wildcard symbol, MySQL will do a full table
scan regardless of any indexes you've created. If you've got a MyISAM
table, I recomme
>-Original Message-
>From: Yannis Haralambous [mailto:yannis.haralamb...@telecom-bretagne.eu]
>Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 10:18 PM
>To: David Brian Chait
>Cc: mysql@lists.mysql.com; y...@mpi-inf.mpg.de
>Subject: Re: How do increase memory allocated to MySQL?
[J
2011/2/4 Yannis Haralambous
> SELECT * FROM wasfoundin WHERE yakoright LIKE '%geography%'
>
That won't use a regular index. Have a look at fulltext indexing.
For the phpmyadmin, I personally feel it's an abomination, not to mention a
disaster waiting to happen; but if you really want to keep us
7:20 PM
To: Yannis Haralambous
Cc: David Brian Chait; mysql@lists.mysql.com; y...@mpi-inf.mpg.de
Subject: Re: How do increase memory allocated to MySQL?
You're query is doing a full table scan.
2011/2/3 Yannis Haralambous
mailto:yannis.haralamb...@telecom-bretagne.eu>>
just a single ta
alambous [mailto:yannis.haralamb...@telecom-bretagne.eu]
> Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 5:43 PM
> To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
> Cc: y...@mpi-inf.mpg.de
> Subject: How do increase memory allocated to MySQL?
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I have loaded a very big amount of data i
.
Thanks,
David
-Original Message-
From: Yannis Haralambous [mailto:yannis.haralamb...@telecom-bretagne.eu]
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 5:43 PM
To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Cc: y...@mpi-inf.mpg.de
Subject: How do increase memory allocated to MySQL?
Hi everybody,
I have loaded a very big
Hi everybody,
I have loaded a very big amount of data in my MySQL database (coming from the
YAGO project):
-rw-rw 1 yannis admin 65 3 fév 16:07 db.opt
-rw-rw 1 yannis admin 6392030392 3 fév 21:35 wasfoundin.MYD
-rw-rw 1 yannis admin 11085793280 4 fév 04:54 wasf
Out of your 4 gigabyte of memory, you allocate 2G to the innodb pool.
Assuming you're using mostly innoDB, that's good. Say there's also about
300M allocated to the OS - assuming a dedicated server; that leaves about
1.7G for non-InnoDB operations.
You have configured your
upgrade to the lastest MySQL 5.1.x branch GA and try again.
Best regards,
Sharl.Jimh.Tsin (From China **Obviously Taiwan INCLUDED**)
2010/11/4 김수영 :
> Dear MySQL users,
>
> I got an "Out of memory" error message on server yesterday.
> I restarted mysqld, and everything
Dear MySQL users,
I got an "Out of memory" error message on server yesterday.
I restarted mysqld, and everything was go back to normal and now is fine.
It happened already twice in this weekend even.
But I don't know what's wrong.
Server has QuadCore Xeon CPU, 4G ECC RAM
Hi Geoff,
> This server has 6GB of RAM and no swap. According to some reasearch I was
> doing I found this formula for calculating memory size:
>
> key_buffer_size + (read_buffer_size + sort_buffer_size)*max_connections =
> (in your case) 384M + (64M + 2M)*1000 = 66384M
>
&g
found this formula for calculating memory size:
key_buffer_size + (read_buffer_size + sort_buffer_size)*max_connections = (in
your case) 384M + (64M + 2M)*1000 = 66384M That come directly from this old
post: http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=5656In our case, the result is just
below 6GB and then acco
annot create thread" errors.
This server has 6GB of RAM and no swap. According to some reasearch I was
doing I found this formula for calculating memory size:
key_buffer_size + (read_buffer_size + sort_buffer_size)*max_connections =
(in your case) 384M + (64M + 2M)*1000 = 66384M
Hello,
We are having issues with one of our servers sometimes hanging up and when
attempting to shutdown the DB, we get "cannot create thread" errors.
This server has 6GB of RAM and no swap. According to some reasearch I was
doing I found this formula for calculating m
On 7/21/2010 12:16 PM, Nunzio Daveri wrote:
database is around 150GB with over 5,000 tables. To make things worse, if I
shutdown MySQL, top-c still says all the memory is still used? Is this a bug,
why would it say all the memory is used when I turn off MySQL. The weird thing
is that when I
Hello Gurus, I just inhereted a Sun 2 U Server with 2 Intel Quad Core CPU's and
16 GB of ram. Here is the problem. The machine is constantly at 99% Memory
utilization and we get random row locking, we are only using InnoDB. The
database is around 150GB with over 5,000 tables. To make t
Hello,
How to query the memory usage for mysql server?
for example, how much memory mysqld has used? and how much memory
available for mysqld?
The OS is Linux.
Thanks.
Young.
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http
id, I am using the thread aware libraries of mysql and
> mysqlpp.
>
> Here are a couple of stack traces I get on application shutdown from a
> memory leak detector (using VLD 1.0 on VS 9.0):
>
> Connect related:
>
> Call Stack:
> f:\dd\vctools\crt_bld\self_x86\crt\src\dbg
orker (when a connection
becomes available)
That all being said, I am using the thread aware libraries of mysql and
mysqlpp.
Here are a couple of stack traces I get on application shutdown from a
memory leak detector (using VLD 1.0 on VS 9.0):
Connect related:
Call Stack:
f:\dd\vctools\crt
Hi, I have a fairly small (data dir is 1.2GB) InnoDB database managed
by MySQL 5.4.3-beta on an 8-core x86_64 Linux box with 16GB RAM. I'd
like to use as much of the memory as possible, but despite specifying
(e.g.) --innodb-buffer-pool-size=30, mysql only ever takes up
374M of res
On Nov 22, 2009, at 8:54 AM, Ryan Chan wrote:
Hello,
Is it common heard from people that if you have large table (assume
MyISAM in my case), you need large memory in order to have the
key/index in memory for performance, otherwise, table scan on disk is
slow.
But how to estimate how much
In the last episode (Nov 22), Ryan Chan said:
> Is it common heard from people that if you have large table (assume MyISAM
> in my case), you need large memory in order to have the key/index in
> memory for performance, otherwise, table scan on disk is slow.
>
> But how to estimate
Hello,
Is it common heard from people that if you have large table (assume
MyISAM in my case), you need large memory in order to have the
key/index in memory for performance, otherwise, table scan on disk is
slow.
But how to estimate how much memory I need?
Consider a simple case, a MyISAM
hi All
how we can allocate memory for mysql database. since we have different
storage. each having its own buffer for running the query.
in oracle we have some calculation for allocating sga size,like this any
method is exist for mysql.
i am seeing mysql is using default 8m for all (myisam and
Ravi raj schrieb:
> Dear walter Harms,
>
> Thanks for your valuable solution, but in the code which
> you provided is printing only one row , if i try to print whole table,
> or 2, or 3, columns fully means its giving segmentation fault, kindly
> check the below code for furthur in
|
|
}
|
//free(sel_smt);
mysql_free_result(res);
mysql_close(MySQL);
exit(0);
}
------code
ends here
Thanks and regards,
Ravi
- Original Message -
From: "walter
exit(0);
}
Ravi raj schrieb:
> Dear All,
>
> I want to connect MYSQL with following C application , while i'm
> trying to retrive the query generated , its corrupting the memory.
>
> Is there any so
Dear All,
I want to connect MYSQL with following C application , while i'm
trying to retrive the query generated , its corrupting the memory.
Is there any solution , to retrive the query generated with out any memory
crashes?
Please help me to solve this problem.
into this.
- Mark
-Original Message-
From: joerg.bru...@sun.com [mailto:joerg.bru...@sun.com]
Sent: woensdag 29 april 2009 8:14
To: Mark; mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re: 1135: Can't create a new thread (errno 35); if you are not out
of available memory, you can consult the ma
files, I just said that using the errno
value reported will help in the analysis (and tried to explain how to do
that).
But if somebody finds that the message
"*1135: Can't create a new thread (errno 35); if you are not out of
available memory, you can consult the manual for a poss
rno 35); if you are not out
of available memory, you can consult the manual for a possible OS-dependent
bug
Jörg
mgai...@martini ~
FGIN.sh 35 | fgrep errno
find: File system loop detected; `/usr/include/gnome-xml/libxml' is part of
the
same file system loop as `/usr/include/gnome-xml&
ebernehmen.
> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:26:47 +0200
> From: joerg.bru...@sun.com
> Subject: Re: 1135: Can't create a new thread (errno 35); if you are not out
> ofavailable memory, you can consult the manual for a possible
> OS-dependent bug
> To: maan...@gmail
; Sent: dinsdag 28 april 2009 10:22
>> To: mysql@lists.mysql.com; VeeJay
>> Subject: 1135: Can't create a new thread (errno 35); if you are not out of
>> available memory, you can consult the manual for a possible OS-dependent
>> bug
>>
>> Hello guys and gurus
&g
away.
- Mark
-Original Message-
From: VeeJay [mailto:maan...@gmail.com]
Sent: dinsdag 28 april 2009 11:27
To: Mark
Cc: mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re: 1135: Can't create a new thread (errno 35); if you are not out
of available memory, you can consult the manual for a possible OS-d
Hi folks
then if I check with the process: I get following output:
# ps ax | grep mysqld
797 con- I 0:00.00 /bin/sh /usr/local/bin/mysqld_safe
--defaults-extra-file=/var/db/mysql/my.cnf --user=mysql
--datadir=/var/db/mysql --pid-file=/var/db/mysql/localhost.server1.pid
835 con- S 8:
lks what MySQL version you are
> running.
> :)
>
> - Mark
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: VeeJay [mailto:maan...@gmail.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 28 april 2009 10:22
> To: mysql@lists.mysql.com; VeeJay
> Subject: 1135: Can't create a new thread (errno 35); if y
t out of
available memory, you can consult the manual for a possible OS-dependent bug
Hello guys and gurus
I am keep getting this error after a while "*1135: Can't create a new thread
(errno 35); if you are not out of available memory, you can consult the
manual for a possible O
Hello guys and gurus
I am keep getting this error after a while "*1135: Can't create a new thread
(errno 35); if you are not out of available memory, you can consult the
manual for a possible OS-dependent bug*"
Even though, I have 16GB memory and 32GB swap. But mysqlserver stops
a
> I'm using MySQL 5.1.30 and have several memory tables with indexes on the
> appropriate columns. When I try and join 2 particular memory tables together
> to get 5k rows, it takes 90 seconds.
> This is incredibly slow considering table1 has 11k rows and table2 has 5k
> row
Memory tables use hash indexes by default instead of b-tree. Try
changing the index, that should help significantly.
regards,
Walter
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 6:47 PM, mos wrote:
> I'm using MySQL 5.1.30 and have several memory tables with indexes on the
> appropriate columns. Whe
I'm using MySQL 5.1.30 and have several memory tables with indexes on the
appropriate columns. When I try and join 2 particular memory tables
together to get 5k rows, it takes 90 seconds.
This is incredibly slow considering table1 has 11k rows and table2 has 5k
rows. A table join like
post the my.cnf
and the output from 'SHOW STATUS'
Claudio
Tadeu Alves wrote:
Hi there guys, latelly our server is suffering from a very big memory
eat problem, when i start mysql it goes with about 2GB of memory, but
about 20h-30h later the server is eating about 8GB, this is a hug
Hi there guys, latelly our server is suffering from a very big memory eat
problem, when i start mysql it goes with about 2GB of memory, but about
20h-30h later the server is eating about 8GB, this is a huge problem i know
that some memory variables have an sort of calculation and i think that the
Hello there guys,
Latelly our database server is going into a very big problem, our current
configuration (is in an attachment file), is having huge load of leak memory
and a variable *innodb_log_file_size *is off cause when i up it the mysqld
doesn't start, our server is having this s
Hi,
My understanding is that the memory utilization of mysql can be calculated
roughly using the formula like:
(All global memory related server variables + max_connections * session
memory related server variables)
As I noticed that most global variables like key_buffer_size,
innodb_buffer_szie
hi,
Thank you for your reply :-)
> What does replication have to do with it?
I wonder whether mysql will copy its binlog from memory( if it exists
) then send to slave. I haven't refer to the source codes yet...
> Slave's binlog? The slave's binlog is not tied to the mas
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 7:04 AM, Cui Shijun wrote:
> hi,
> I wonder if it is safe to assume that binlog can stay in master's
> memory when replication happens
It's not safe to assume. It varies from system to system depending on
operating system, filesystem, scheduler a
hi,
I wonder if it is safe to assume that binlog can stay in master's
memory when replication happens. If not, when the binlog getts
corruptted, will the slave's binlog also get corrupted?
Is there way to make the slave's binlog survive even in master's disk failure?
Jake Maul wrote:
> Didn't want this to go unanswered, although I don't have any great
> info for you.
>
> As long as you're running a 64-bit OS and a 64-bit version of MySQL,
> there's no technical reason it would be limited to less than the
> addressable space (that I know of). The main gain wo
Quoth Baron Schwartz :
> So I assume you have a terabyte of RAM in the server, since you didn't
> say... OMG, it's using 143GB of RAM when it's idle? Wow..
>
> :-) You need to provide some more details here. I can't judge
> whether there is any issue at all.
Sorry. My VPS has 144 MB of RAM so
stian Tennant
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I recently installed MySQL (version 5.0) on my Debian Lenny VPS and
> mysqld uses 14.3% of memory when idle.
>
> Is this a known issue?
>
> I'm aware that version 5.0 is not the latest version but it's the one
> currently shi
Quoth wult...@gmail.com:
> Through your conf file(s) you have told MySQL how much memory it may
> consume. As long as the server does not go beyond what it is told it
> may consume it is not doing anything wrong.
Thanks. I'll have a look in the conf file. At the moment it's
Quoth Walter Heck :
> You could bring it down, but the real question is if you really want
> to do that? Making the buffers and caches smaller will reduce the
> memory used, but it also reduces performance.
Noted.
> Could you tell us what you are hoping to use MySQL for and why you
&
You could bring it down, but the real question is if you really want
to do that? Making the buffers and caches smaller will reduce the
memory used, but it also reduces performance.
Could you tell us what you are hoping to use MySQL for and why you
wanna bring the memory usage down?
Walter
Hi all,
I recently installed MySQL (version 5.0) on my Debian Lenny VPS and
mysqld uses 14.3% of memory when idle.
Is this a known issue?
I'm aware that version 5.0 is not the latest version but it's the one
currently shipped by Debian Lenny (testing) so I'm loathe to 'manua
at 7:40 AM, mos
<<mailto:mo...@fastmail.fm>mo...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
At 01:08 PM 1/20/2009, you wrote:
While specing out a new server, I was wondering if there is any limit to
how much memory can be allocated to mysql 5.1. If a server has 16GB of
ram, can mysql take advantage of that
> At 01:08 PM 1/20/2009, you wrote:
>
>> While specing out a new server, I was wondering if there is any limit to
>> how much memory can be allocated to mysql 5.1. If a server has 16GB of ram,
>> can mysql take advantage of that much ram (minus a reserved amount for the
>
At 01:08 PM 1/20/2009, you wrote:
While specing out a new server, I was wondering if there is any limit to
how much memory can be allocated to mysql 5.1. If a server has 16GB of
ram, can mysql take advantage of that much ram (minus a reserved amount
for the OS obviously)? Is there any limit
ote:
>> While specing out a new server, I was wondering if there is any limit to
>> how much memory can be allocated to mysql 5.1. If a server has 16GB of
>> ram, can mysql take advantage of that much ram (minus a reserved amount
>> for the OS obviously)? Is there any lim
ch RAM as you can stuff in the box.
Whether it can use it *effectively* is something I don't have any
experience with beyond ~8GB. I suspect it would work just fine,
though.
Jake
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:08 PM, wrote:
> While specing out a new server, I was wondering if there is
While specing out a new server, I was wondering if there is any limit to how
much memory can be allocated to mysql 5.1. If a server has 16GB of ram, can
mysql take advantage of that much ram (minus a reserved amount for the OS
obviously)? Is there any limit such as those imposed by 32-bit
ases, then call mysqldump for each database. The
problem is that while I am running the script, the amount of memory
that mysql on db1 uses gradually grows until it uses all RAM and swap and the
kernel kills mysqld (it's not mysqldump, it's mysql itself). I have
my settings very conservat
s identical hardware and only a slightly upgraded distro (but also
> running 5.1.23-rc), I get a glibc malloc(): memory corruption: *** error,
> which traces back to the mysql_real_connect() call. I ran ldd -v on the
> binary on both machines and there are some differences, but they do
ng
5.1.23-rc), I get a glibc malloc(): memory corruption: *** error, which traces
back to the mysql_real_connect() call. I ran ldd -v on the binary on both
machines and there are some differences, but they don't look important. I have
run this binary on other machines before with no issues.
istro (but also running
5.1.23-rc), I get a glibc malloc(): memory corruption: *** error, which traces
back to the mysql_real_connect() call. I ran ldd -v on the binary on both
machines and there are some differences, but they don't look important. I have
run this binary on other machines b
t;
> > I get this error while taking mysqldump of an InnoDB table (say
> "mytable")
> > mysqldump: Error 5: *Out of memory (Needed 632894352 bytes) when dumping
> > table `mytable` at row: 484911*
> >
> >
> > *current my.cnf settings:*
>
nd read various suggestions. But
> havnt found an appropriate solution yet.
>
> I get this error while taking mysqldump of an InnoDB table (say "mytable")
> mysqldump: Error 5: *Out of memory (Needed 632894352 bytes) when dumping
> table `mytable` at row: 484911*
>
>
> *cur
Hey Guys!
I have been googling a lot on this error and read various suggestions. But
havnt found an appropriate solution yet.
I get this error while taking mysqldump of an InnoDB table (say "mytable")
mysqldump: Error 5: *Out of memory (Needed 632894352 bytes) when dumping
table `mytab
gt; application code, your hardware, or generally something in your setup.
>
> Well, I thought it might be my code too. That's why when the memory
> table was built (without the index), I went to a SqlMgr and counted the
> rows. None of the rows were missing. Then I did an Alter Table and
ly something in your setup.
>
> Well, I thought it might be my code too. That's why when the memory
> table was built (without the index), I went to a SqlMgr and counted the
> rows. None of the rows were missing. Then I did an Alter Table and added
> one index to the memory table,
At 09:14 AM 7/26/2008, you wrote:
At 5:52p -0400 on Fri, 25 Jul 2008, mos wrote:
[Adding index to memory table silently loses data]
First thing, what version are you using?
MySQL 5.0.24a on Windows XP Pro with 3gb RAM. The server is on the same
machine as the client since I'm the onl
At 5:52p -0400 on Fri, 25 Jul 2008, mos wrote:
[Adding index to memory table silently loses data]
First thing, what version are you using?
Second thing, although it would still be broken, did you read the MySQL
docs to make sure that the Memory table type supports the index *type*
you attempted
1 - 100 of 870 matches
Mail list logo
