Re: [newbie] 9.2 Beta 2

2003-09-07 Thread dfox
Somebody scribbled about Re: [newbie] 9.2 Beta 2 How, specifically, are you adjusting your time zones? OK. From kde panel right click on the clock. (S)how timezone has america/los angeles checked. But it's not America/Los angeles that it is displaying. Adjust Date time brings up a dialog box

Re: [newbie] 9.2 Beta 2

2003-09-07 Thread dfox
Somebody scribbled about Re: [newbie] 9.2 Beta 2 A few times after KDE cooker updates I've had to reset the clock. R-click on it, adjust time an date, make sure format is set to USA-english. This is still going with cooker current as of last night -- rc1 + dozens of updates. But apply

Re: [newbie] 9.2 Beta 2

2003-09-07 Thread Dennis Myers
On Monday 08 September 2003 09:57 pm, dfox wrote: Somebody scribbled about Re: [newbie] 9.2 Beta 2 A few times after KDE cooker updates I've had to reset the clock. R-click on it, adjust time an date, make sure format is set to USA-english. This is still going with cooker current

Re: [newbie] 9.2 Beta 2

2003-08-26 Thread ed tharp
On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 13:02, Lanman wrote: HaywireMac; No knickers to worry about! You might be right about the hijack, under the conditions you specified. I didn't see a hijack happening, because my thread was under a different name. Just so you know, I've never even seen any list of

Re: [newbie] 9.2 Beta 2

2003-08-26 Thread Lanman
Wow! Ed! You're obviously a man of few words! That was really deep! Thanks for the info! ?? LOL! Lanman *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 8/25/2003 at 9:25 PM ed tharp wrote: Maybe that's where I'm going wrong? yep Or maybe the server just handles it that way. Or (yep) BOTH... (go

Re: [newbie] 9.2 Beta 2

2003-08-25 Thread HaywireMac
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 12:57:18 -0400 Lanman [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered: Excuse me? I thought this was a thread about Mandrake 9.2 Beta2? What did I hijack? Please define a hijack for me, so I can avoid it. Besides, isn't this a List about Mandrake Linux? It has been since I joined 4 years ago

Re: [newbie] 9.2 Beta 2

2003-08-25 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Sunday August 24 2003 02:23 pm, David E. Fox wrote: That's all done and running properly. 'date', xclock, what have you, all show the correct time. There was one time recently when the time was about 20 minutes off but I fixed it. It's the *KDE* clock display that's wrong. Right now it's

Re: [newbie] 9.2 Beta 2

2003-08-25 Thread Lanman
HaywireMac; No knickers to worry about! You might be right about the hijack, under the conditions you specified. I didn't see a hijack happening, because my thread was under a different name. Just so you know, I've never even seen any list of rules, didn't even know they existed until now. When

Re: [newbie] 9.2 Beta 2

2003-08-25 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Sunday August 24 2003 01:56 pm, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote: How, specifically, are you adjusting your time zones? With ntpd? Just pick a time server in your zone. For syncing your software clock to your hardware clock see 'man hwclock'. EG, hwclock --systohc' -- Tom Brinkman

Re: [newbie] 9.2 Beta 2

2003-08-25 Thread Brant Fitzsimmons
Tom Brinkman wrote: On Sunday August 24 2003 01:56 pm, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote: How, specifically, are you adjusting your time zones? With ntpd? Just pick a time server in your zone. For syncing your software clock to your hardware clock see 'man hwclock'. EG, hwclock --systohc' My

Re: [newbie] 9.2 Beta 2

2003-08-25 Thread Anne Wilson
On Monday 25 Aug 2003 6:02 pm, Lanman wrote: HaywireMac; No knickers to worry about! You might be right about the hijack, under the conditions you specified. I didn't see a hijack happening, because my thread was under a different name. Just so you know, I've never even seen any list of rules,

Re: [newbie] 9.2 Beta 2

2003-08-24 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Sunday August 24 2003 07:04 am, Lanman wrote: Since the release of 9.2 Beta2 I haven't heard or seen anything about it from anyone on the list. Is this because it's so amazing that list members are speechless? I've run cooker only since 7.2. Current cooker is solid, no problems on a

Re: [newbie] 9.2 Beta 2

2003-08-24 Thread David E. Fox
I've run cooker only since 7.2. Current cooker is solid, no problems on a overclocked XP 3000+. 2266 Mhz on a KT400a chipset It's *pretty* solid. There are still some issues I'm experiencing. One is the timezone drift in kde's clock - my time zone is 5 hours off. I have retried the fix

Re: [newbie] 9.2 Beta 2

2003-08-24 Thread David E. Fox
Any suggestions or similar situations out there in Mandrake-Land? I realize= that it's a Beta, and that there may be bugs in it still, but perhaps ther= It happened to me... Lanman, see my other post to Tom on this. The upshot is that even with the missing rpm message, you can reboot and get

Re: [newbie] 9.2 Beta 2

2003-08-24 Thread Mark Annandale
On Sunday 24 Aug 2003 1:04 pm, Lanman wrote: The only way I managed to install it was to first disconnect my printer completely. Cannot remember what else wasn't working but I decided to go back to 9.1. Fortunately my /home stuff was still there and I didn't even notice I'd reinstalled. HTH

Re: [newbie] 9.2 Beta 2

2003-08-24 Thread Lanman
Thanks Tom dfox. Since I was using a removable hard drive rack, it's not that critical. I'll wait for RC1. Tom, went to the website you mentioned, but I didn't see anything about how to get around the printer problem I was having. The install fails as soon as it tries to run printer-utils.rpm.

Re: [newbie] 9.2 Beta 2

2003-08-24 Thread HaywireMac
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 08:04:38 -0400 Lanman [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered: Any suggestions in Mandrake-Land? Ya, don't hijack threads. -- HaywireMac Registered Linux user #282046 Homepage: nodex.sytes.net ++ If we do not change our direction we are likely to end up where we are

Re: [newbie] 9.2 Beta 2

2003-08-24 Thread David E. Fox
Thanks. Maybe I read the release incorrectly. They must have been saying th= at it would be included in the next version, and I took it to mean Beta2, n= Just checking sunsite.uio.no ATM -- beta 2 is still there. No RC1 yet. But there's been a flurry of activity. I just finished a urpmi

Re: [newbie] 9.2 Beta 2

2003-08-24 Thread Lanman
Excuse me? I thought this was a thread about Mandrake 9.2 Beta2? What did I hijack? Please define a hijack for me, so I can avoid it. Besides, isn't this a List about Mandrake Linux? It has been since I joined 4 years ago ! Please explain how I could've hijacked a thread when I believe I was

Re: [newbie] 9.2 Beta 2

2003-08-24 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Sunday August 24 2003 10:27 am, David E. Fox wrote: Lanman, see my other post to Tom on this. The upshot is that even with the missing rpm message, you can reboot and get a working install. It's nearly at the end of the install. RC1 (rumor unsubstantiated) is out. You could burn new

Re: [newbie] 9.2 Beta 2

2003-08-24 Thread David E. Fox
Do you have your time set correctly in bios? Do you run ntpd ? I have no time issues with 9.2 over two differnet sets of hardware (motherboard clock RTC chipsets). http://www.ntp.org/ has a list of That's all done and running properly. 'date', xclock, what have you, all show the correct

Re: [newbie] 9.2 Beta 2

2003-08-24 Thread Lanman
Thanks. Maybe I read the release incorrectly. They must have been saying that it would be included in the next version, and I took it to mean Beta2, not 9.3. I'm going to wait for RC1 before doing a real upgrade. Lanman Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to

Re: [newbie] 9.2 Beta 2

2003-08-24 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Sunday August 24 2003 09:59 am, David E. Fox wrote: I've run cooker only since 7.2. Current cooker is solid, no problems on a overclocked XP 3000+. 2266 Mhz on a KT400a chipset It's *pretty* solid. There are still some issues I'm experiencing. One is the timezone drift in kde's

Re: [newbie] 9.2 Beta 2

2003-08-24 Thread Brant Fitzsimmons
David E. Fox wrote: I've run cooker only since 7.2. Current cooker is solid, no problems on a overclocked XP 3000+. 2266 Mhz on a KT400a chipset It's *pretty* solid. There are still some issues I'm experiencing. One is the timezone drift in kde's clock - my time zone is 5 hours off. I