On Thursday 09 Jan 2003 6:46 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
This is the same for 8.2 and 9.0 (i just checked).
Open KMail
Open a composer window (New or Reply)
Settings Configure Toolbars
Highlight the 'spelling' option in the left 'Available actions' pane.
Click the [-] arrow button to move
All I have to do now is configure my memory to hit the button. Don't
suppose you have any tricks for that one ;-)
Anne
--
A (not very good) suggestion, Anne.
KMail - settings - identity - signature.
In the signature box, enter something like
CHECK SPELLING
This will appear on each
Thanks Anne!
On Friday 10 January 2003 2:21 pm, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Friday 10 Jan 2003 2:18 pm, Keith Powell wrote:
On Friday 10 January 2003 11:26 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
SNIP
BTW, I'm getting a '--' between your quoted text and your reply. This
has the effect of your reply
On Thu, 09 Jan 2003 08:29, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 08 Jan 2003 6:45 pm, Michael Adams wrote:
I actually have achieved something usefull in this respect. I have a
spell checker icon in kmail composer windows.
If you're serious, please tell us more
Anne
Sorry, i'll explain, the
Charlie wrote:
On January 6, 2003 06:55 am, Robin Turner wrote:
snip
If people remember to put OT in the header, yes. However, I'm not
sure how you do it client-side to prevent the message from being
downloaded in the first place, which is the real problem for people with
low (and maybe
On Thursday 09 Jan 2003 10:17 am, Michael Adams wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jan 2003 08:29, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 08 Jan 2003 6:45 pm, Michael Adams wrote:
I actually have achieved something usefull in this respect. I have a
spell checker icon in kmail composer windows.
If you're
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 09 Jan 2003 8:58 am, Hylton Conacher (ZR1HPC) wrote:
Wouldn't that be nice if the POP mail system could do that! In my
experience, using Netscape and Mozilla mail, I either download all the
messages from the ISP or none.
Are you sure it doesn't? I'm sure I
little messages, not one or two big ones). On the positive side,
Mozilla/Netscape allows you the option of leaving messages on the server
but having them deleted there when they are deleted locally - very
useful when you're logging on from different computers.
I really miss this one in
: [newbie] OT's on this list]
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 09 Jan 2003 8:58 am, Hylton Conacher (ZR1HPC) wrote:
Wouldn't that be nice if the POP mail system could do that! In my
experience, using Netscape and Mozilla mail, I either download all the
messages from the ISP or none.
Are you
On Thursday 09 Jan 2003 1:44 pm, Robin Turner wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 09 Jan 2003 8:58 am, Hylton Conacher (ZR1HPC) wrote:
Wouldn't that be nice if the POP mail system could do that! In my
experience, using Netscape and Mozilla mail, I either download all the
messages from the
On Thu, 09 Jan 2003 23:35, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 09 Jan 2003 10:17 am, Michael Adams wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jan 2003 08:29, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 08 Jan 2003 6:45 pm, Michael Adams wrote:
I actually have achieved something usefull in this respect. I have a
spell checker
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 07:46, Anne Wilson wrote:
This is the same for 8.2 and 9.0 (i just checked).
Open KMail
Open a composer window (New or Reply)
Settings Configure Toolbars
Highlight the 'spelling' option in the left 'Available actions' pane.
Click the [-] arrow button to move it to
I would like to take this opportunity to apologize to the list for posting as
I have.
Not because I feel that my opinions are wrong, I don't. But because this
really isn't the proper forum to vent them.
I waited for as long as I was going to before posting. Waiting for this to die
off.
I'm
On Wed, 08 Jan 2003 13:02, Robin Turner wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
You hit us at the wrong time, Andy. There is usually a bit of OT, but
not much. This last 2 days have been most unusual. However, things have
been a bit quiet in the past few weeks. The norm, without much OT, is
200 -
On Wednesday 08 Jan 2003 10:28 am, Michael Adams wrote:
On Wed, 08 Jan 2003 13:02, Robin Turner wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
You hit us at the wrong time, Andy. There is usually a bit of OT, but
not much. This last 2 days have been most unusual. However, things
have been a bit quiet in
On Wednesday 08 January 2003 05:28 am, you wrote:
On Wed, 08 Jan 2003 13:02, Robin Turner wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
You hit us at the wrong time, Andy. There is usually a bit of OT, but
not much. This last 2 days have been most unusual. However, things
have been a bit quiet in the
On Wednesday 08 Jan 2003 11:19 am, Lee wrote:
On Wednesday 08 January 2003 05:28 am, you wrote:
On Wed, 08 Jan 2003 13:02, Robin Turner wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
You hit us at the wrong time, Andy. There is usually a bit of OT,
but not much. This last 2 days have been most unusual.
On Wednesday 08 January 2003 06:02 am, you wrote:
On Wednesday 08 Jan 2003 11:19 am, Lee wrote:
On Wednesday 08 January 2003 05:28 am, you wrote:
On Wed, 08 Jan 2003 13:02, Robin Turner wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
Though I have to say that I had automatic spellchecking on all outgoing
On Thu, 09 Jan 2003 00:02, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Wednesday 08 Jan 2003 11:19 am, Lee wrote:
On Wednesday 08 January 2003 05:28 am, you wrote:
On Wed, 08 Jan 2003 13:02, Robin Turner wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
You hit us at the wrong time, Andy. There is usually a bit of OT,
but
On Wednesday 08 Jan 2003 6:45 pm, Michael Adams wrote:
I actually have achieved something usefull in this respect. I have a spell
checker icon in kmail composer windows.
If you're serious, please tell us more
Anne
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to
s wrote:
You know, it's not the ot's that bothers me, it those posts with
signatures over the usually acceptable 4 lines. There's a couple on
here with 10 - 15 lines in their sigs. Talk about inconsideration!
Where does this four-line convention come from? A typical sig might
consist
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 21:35, robin wrote:
s wrote:
You know, it's not the ot's that bothers me, it those posts with
signatures over the usually acceptable 4 lines. There's a couple on
here with 10 - 15 lines in their sigs. Talk about inconsideration!
Where does this four-line
At 12:22 06/01/03 +, you wrote:
It was never my intention to set off such a long OT, but it is harmless. For
those who find it a problem it is a simple matter to set a filter that
ignores such posts - correct me if I'm wrong?
...
Hi,
I've been on this list for 2 days. I'm a newbie to MD,
On Tuesday 07 Jan 2003 9:56 am, Andy Micklethwaite wrote:
At 12:22 06/01/03 +, you wrote:
It was never my intention to set off such a long OT, but it is harmless.
For those who find it a problem it is a simple matter to set a filter
that ignores such posts - correct me if I'm wrong?
On Tuesday 07 January 2003 04:56 am, you wrote:
At 12:22 06/01/03 +, you wrote:
It was never my intention to set off such a long OT, but it is harmless.
For those who find it a problem it is a simple matter to set a filter
that ignores such posts - correct me if I'm wrong?
...
Hi,
Andy, I've been on the list when I have time for about six months. Mail
volume has been DOWN, possibly because of everyone being busy of the
Christmas/New Years holidays.
It's best to FILTER your messages so business/personal/mandrake mail all goes
to its own box, that way, even if you get
Anne Wilson wrote:
You hit us at the wrong time, Andy. There is usually a bit of OT, but not
much. This last 2 days have been most unusual. However, things have been a
bit quiet in the past few weeks. The norm, without much OT, is 200 - 250
posts a day.
A good point. The two major OT
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 19:02, Robin Turner wrote:
1. Banter about Star Trek. You're bound to get that sooner or later
on any geeky list - it's just the way we are!
2. Arguments about American politics and the incipient war in the
Middle East. I agree that this is totally OT, but on the
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 05:56, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
Sir Robin Longsig
If my ancient brain fires the proper neural synaptic pathways correctly
and remembers - the four line sig originated in newsgroups and
migrated into mailing lists quite some time ago...but that was when
anal-retentiveness
On Tuesday 07 January 2003 04:56 am, Andy Micklethwaite wrote:
I've been on this list for 2 days. I'm a newbie to MD, trying to convert
from Windoze - Among many other things I've not got the SM56 modem going
yet - guess why! BG.
However I use a dial up connection, and my access time has
It was never my intention to set off such a long OT, but it is harmless. For
those who find it a problem it is a simple matter to set a filter that
ignores such posts - correct me if I'm wrong?
I do not want to be a nuisance to others, but nor should they be a nuisance to
me.
Anne
Want to
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 12:22, Anne Wilson wrote:
It was never my intention to set off such a long OT, but it is harmless. For
those who find it a problem it is a simple matter to set a filter that
ignores such posts - correct me if I'm wrong?
I do not want to be a nuisance to others, but
On Monday 06 Jan 2003 12:46 pm, David Robertson wrote:
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 12:22, Anne Wilson wrote:
It was never my intention to set off such a long OT, but it is harmless.
For those who find it a problem it is a simple matter to set a filter
that ignores such posts - correct me if I'm
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 12:50, Anne Wilson wrote:
I totally agree - but the way to improve that problem is to encourage cropping
of quotes. Sometimes we get two or even three screens of quotes to 2 lines
of new material. That seriously does harm bandwidth and mailbox space.
.and my
Anne Wilson wrote:
It was never my intention to set off such a long OT, but it is harmless. For
those who find it a problem it is a simple matter to set a filter that
ignores such posts - correct me if I'm wrong?
If people remember to put OT in the header, yes. However, I'm not
sure how you
On Monday 06 Jan 2003 1:55 pm, Robin Turner wrote:
If I recall rightly, the whole thing started with a question about KDE
or GNOME - that is one subject we should definitely ban ;-)
Or perhaps *request* that replies are restricted to pointing out that personal
preference reigns, since most
On January 6, 2003 06:55 am, Robin Turner wrote:
snip
If people remember to put OT in the header, yes. However, I'm not
sure how you do it client-side to prevent the message from being
downloaded in the first place, which is the real problem for people with
low (and maybe expensive)
37 matches
Mail list logo
