I'm suspecting the NICs may have fried, as they don't get on the network,
but the ILO card is working fine when plugged into the same ports. However,
all the hardware checks out in the diagnostics. As it would be, we don't
have any spare NICs and the server is out of warranty.
On 20 September
Bingo.
*ASB*
* *
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com wrote:
Who cares what they charge?
You are getting what you paid for. And if you then decide you need
something better, you can unlock those features without having to replace
your CPU.
Cheers
Ken
You know you could just put the drive in a working esxi system and mount the
datastore and files ...
Given how easy that is, I wouldn't disagree but if you insist on some other way
to
recover the data, you can always mount the vmfs partitions in windows or Linux.
http://code.google.com/p/vmfs/
Would it see the disk OK even if it hasn't been configured in the HP ACU?
I'm an ESXi novice and not sure how ESXi actually picks up logical disks
On 21 September 2010 05:59, Level Five - List li...@levelfive.us wrote:
You know you could just put the drive in a working esxi system and mount
Yes HP has Firmware Maintenance DVD's now, I think the latest is Version
9.1.
Z
Edward E. Ziots
CISSP, Network +, Security +
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
Email:ezi...@lifespan.org
Cell:401-639-3505
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Monday,
How is your VM storage attached?
Local disk, NFS, iSCSI, FC?
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 5:01 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: ESXi fun
Would it see the disk OK even if it hasn't been configured in the HP ACU?
I'm an ESXi
Local disks only. No shared storage sucks. Not long now though - NetApp is
being built as we speak.
On 21 September 2010 13:25, Martin Blackstone mblackst...@gmail.com wrote:
How is your VM storage attached?
Local disk, NFS, iSCSI, FC?
*From:* James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
I loves me some NetApp!!
Any chance you have a spare server you could slap the disks in?
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 5:29 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: ESXi fun
Local disks only. No shared storage sucks. Not long now
I've spotted another DL360 with a couple of spare drive bays that is running
ESXi as well. I'm just trying to find the IP address because it doesn't
appear to be in DNS (there is some serious process implementation needing
doing at this place).
On 21 September 2010 13:39, Martin Blackstone
Connect a serial cable to it, ssh in (use Putty, its free) and run ifconfig.
You should get something like this:
vswif0Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:56:4E:D4:28
inet addr:172.16.15.21 Bcast:172.16.15.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST
If you can log into it, then give the command ifconfig
--
RMc
James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote on 09/21/2010 07:41:42 AM:
I've spotted another DL360 with a couple of spare drive bays that is
running ESXi as well. I'm just trying to find the IP address because
it doesn't appear to be
My ESXi education continuescheers
Now I find the KVM is faulty. It's one of those days!
On 21 September 2010 13:49, Martin Blackstone mblackst...@gmail.com wrote:
Connect a serial cable to it, ssh in (use Putty, its free) and run
ifconfig. You should get something like this:
vswif0
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Jon Harris jk.har...@gmail.com wrote:
You mean you don't store that stuff in big plastic bags for reuse?
Seriously now you don't? I know that I used to keep two trash bags full of
them at the last job for shipping IT stuff and at least two others kept bags
for
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com wrote:
You are getting what you paid for. And if you then decide you need something
better, you can unlock those features without having to replace your CPU.
It wouldn't bother me so much except that you're actually getting
Remember Jurassic Park? Hey, I know this system - it's just unix!
Find yourself an 8-year-old girl to help you out...
James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote on 09/21/2010 07:58:14 AM:
My ESXi education continuescheers
Now I find the KVM is faulty. It's one of those days!
On 21
L3+
Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
Technology Coordinator
Eagle Physicians Associates, PA
jra...@eaglemds.comBLOCKED::mailto:%20jra...@eaglemds.com
www.eaglemds.comBLOCKED::http://www.eaglemds.com/
From: richardmccl...@aspca.org
Looks like a prime situation for Murphy.
My guess is you've walked into a situation that has had a fair amount of
neglect for quite a while... Good luck!
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 8:58 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote:
My ESXi education continuescheers
Now I find the KVM is
She took over where the lone sysadmin left off, the guy who ran the entire
dino zoo infrastructure from one workstation (application development as
well debugging eight million lines of code) with zero documentation.
However all they had to do was reboot the servers and everything was OK -
except
For me, it's not a big deal. You're paying for a specific features/benefit
mix at a certain unit of currency. If you like it, you go for it. If not,
you choose alternatives.
If you want more functionality, they're offering it without changing out the
hardware. You just pay for it.
At each
Do any of these solutions have an option to insert excessively large eMails
signatures into them automatically? I'm still looking for a solution that
will attach a Flash based video to every eMail we send.
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:32 PM, John Aldrich jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com
wrote:
How
Isn't stealing illegal in most countries? IIRC, that concept goes all the way
back to the days of Moses...about 3,400 years ago, give or take a century ;-)
Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
Technology Coordinator
Eagle Physicians Associates, PA
jra...@eaglemds.com
www.eaglemds.com
I was going to suggest Kerio as well.
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 8:14 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?
Gmail?
Xmail?
IceWarp's Merak and Kerio are cheap and include a LOT of
In this country, you must either have a corporate charter or be a part of
the government to steal legally. Don't try this if you are a private
citizen... :-)
***
Charlie Kaiser
charl...@golden-eagle.org
Kingman, AZ
***
-Original Message-
From:
That I dont know. Wish I could help you. Most of my experience with
3rd-party email hosting is for my personal email, and for my personal email
I mostly use my Kmail on my Linux box.
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:dhampsh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 9:41 AM
To: NT System
Sad, but true. I would be willing to bet that we're not the only country in
that boat.
Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
Technology Coordinator
Eagle Physicians Associates, PA
jra...@eaglemds.com
www.eaglemds.com
-Original Message-
From: Charlie Kaiser
Awesome -thanks Michael.
-Malcolm
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 17:06
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: PowerShell - pipeline input help
Close.
get-aduser -filter * -searchbase OU=Test,OU=User
Typically, that involved the single issue of illegal possession of some
physical item.
There's a whole area of new law that needs to be made on this area. We're
now in the situation where I legally own something, have legal physical
possession, but you're retaining certain rights in relation to
True. This could make for an interesting debate.
Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
Technology Coordinator
Eagle Physicians Associates, PA
jra...@eaglemds.comBLOCKED::mailto:%20jra...@eaglemds.com
www.eaglemds.comBLOCKED::http://www.eaglemds.com/
From: Jonathan
That is a mail CLIENT, to wit
http://email.about.com/cs/linuxclientrevs/gr/kmail.htm, has nothing to do
with a mail server which is what this discussion was ostensibly about.
You are not hosting mail, you are receiving mail from a provider, likely
your ISP. If you were using sendmail or postfix,
What's the standard for email retention for companies which are NOT publicly
traded? What's the SOX rules on email retention? I just helped one of our
managers open some Outlook data files dating back to 2007 which got me
thinking about the wisdom of retaining information that long and I wasn't
So do you want the rules for SOX, or do you want the rules for private
firms?
- WJR
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 09:04, John Aldrich jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.comwrote:
What's the standard for email retention for companies which are NOT
publicly
traded? What's the SOX rules on email retention? I
There is no standard, it's determined by business requriements and
regulatory requirements for your industry.
SOX rules are for publicly traded companies, so you're asking contradictory
questions.
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:04 AM, John Aldrich jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com
wrote:
What's the
Our owner wanted 30 days to be standard retention policy for email. Lawyers
said 90. We keep everything 90 days.
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.comwrote:
There is no standard, it's determined by business requriements and
regulatory requirements for your
Very good point.
It would be like buying a car that's priced $1,000 less than an identical car;
the only difference is that there's a steel block under the gas pedal. If you
wanted the extra acceleration, you'd pay $1,000 to have the dealer remove the
block. As a customer, would you feel like
I believe we keep 6 months on tape, latest 2 weeks on SAN.
Don Guyer
Systems Engineer - Information Services
Prudential, Fox Roach/Trident Group
431 W. Lancaster Avenue
Devon, PA 19333
Direct: (610) 993-3299
Fax: (610) 650-5306
don.gu...@prufoxroach.com mailto:don.gu...@prufoxroach.com
Compare and contrast that to chipping the EMS?
-Original Message-
From: Bob Hartung bhart...@wiscoind.com
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 09:13:56
To: NT System Admin Issuesntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com
Reply-To: NT System Admin Issues
ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.comSubject: Re:
Next thing you know, we'll be looking for Easter Eggs...
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 5:08 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your
CPU
Bingo.
ASB
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at
Wow! That's not long at all
The reason I was asking about SOX requirements was that I thought we could
pretend we were publicly traded and go by those rules. It wouldn't
surprise me if congress mandates SOX or something like it for *everyone*
eventually, publicly traded companies or not.
I
Eleventyfour. Or whatever the Senior Management team decides. SOX does not
equal privately held company.
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:04 AM, John Aldrich jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com
wrote:
What's the standard for email retention for companies which are NOT
publicly
traded? What's the SOX
Ah ah ah... you didn't say please.
From: richardmccl...@aspca.org [mailto:richardmccl...@aspca.org]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 8:09 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: ESXi fun
Remember Jurassic Park? Hey, I know this system - it's just unix!
Find yourself an 8-year-old
I wonder if it wouldn't be something similar to the recent ruling that a
phone owner can legally jail-break their iPhone, but Apple can then refuse
to support it???
From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 9:58 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Has anyone see issues with the latest IIS patch causing Default Web
Application Pool to error out, and bomb?
Specifically Patch 2124261 which was from MS10-065 accordingly?
Z
Edward E. Ziots
CISSP, Network +, Security +
Network Engineer
Lifespan Organization
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 9:08 AM, richardmccl...@aspca.org wrote:
Remember Jurassic Park? Hey, I know this system - it's just unix! Find
yourself an 8-year-old girl to help you out...
Unfortunately that only helps you run the SGI 3D file navigator demo.
-- Ben
~ Finally, powerful endpoint
True. What I was trying to say in a very round-about fashion (and done
poorly at that, I admit) was that I don't know much about email hosting. I'm
thinking that if the OP wants full control over email, and the other OP
wants to insert a Quicktime video on every email, it's best to have
something
SOX does not say Thou shalt keep all email for X days/months/years.
It says Thou shalt have a retention policy and shall abide by it.
Bottom line - let the lawyers set the policy. Your job is really only to
enforce it with the appropriate technology.
Jim Holmgren
Manager of Server
IANAL, however, I believe the sticking point may be (for private firms, anyway)
that if you ever find yourself in litigation, the lawyers will ask what your
formal retention policy is...
If they find you on either side of that retention policy, you could be up a
creek, because then they either
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:19 AM, John Aldrich
jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com wrote:
I wonder if it wouldn't be something similar to the recent ruling that a
phone owner can legally jail-break their iPhone, but Apple can then refuse
to support it???
That ruling is, as you say, recent. I'm
Possibly, but define support.
If support means that you've voided the warranty and they won't help you if it
doesn't work, so be it. I knew the risk going into it.
However, if support means that they won't even allow us to use it, then I think
we'd call foul, but probably nobody would hear
Has anyone heard about a new Virus hitting Twitter today? I just got a second
hand report from someone that a virus is spreading quickly on Twitter and I
want to do more research.
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
Gordon Brown's wife is responsible
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11382469
On 21 September 2010 15:26, Terry Dickson te...@treasurer.state.ks.uswrote:
Has anyone heard about a new Virus hitting Twitter today? I just got a
second hand report from someone that a virus is spreading
Having trouble thinking of a reason to care about a tweet virus...
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Terry Dickson
te...@treasurer.state.ks.uswrote:
Has anyone heard about a new Virus hitting Twitter today? I just got a
second hand report from someone that a virus is spreading quickly on
I tawt I taw a putty tat... I DID, I DID!
Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
Technology Coordinator
Eagle Physicians Associates, PA
jra...@eaglemds.comBLOCKED::mailto:%20jra...@eaglemds.com
www.eaglemds.comBLOCKED::http://www.eaglemds.com/
From: Jeff Brown
Thanks. I'll advise my boss that we should seek legal guidance on that. :-)
From: Raper, Jonathan - Eagle [mailto:jra...@eaglemds.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 10:24 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Email retention
IANAL, however, I believe the sticking point may be (for
Annoyingly enough, SOX doesn't specify any retention period. However, it
does implicitly require a formalized and structured retention policy to be
applied. Of course, SOX doesn't apply to non-publicly-traded companies
anyway.
Even without SOX or other regulatory requirements, a retention policy
If you applied a hack to your Windows 7 installation that allowed you to bypass
some of the security controls (e.g. product activation), would you expect
Microsoft to support it? The ruling says, It's your hardware, so you can do
what you want with it. Apple says, If you modify the operating
Well I initially was the same way, except the second hand report said it was
affecting computer systems at corporations. I wanted to do some more research
since we have users at our office using tweetdeck.
From: Jeff Brown [mailto:2jbr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 9:28 AM
Well, you're mixing some vastly different problems. Employee issues should
be handled by management. If there's communication regarding policies, that
should again be handled by management. I generate our IT policies, pass
them onto management, discuss and refine said policies with it, and then
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Jim Holmgren jholmg...@xlhealth.com wrote:
SOX does not say Thou shalt keep all email for X days/months/years.
It says Thou shalt have a retention policy and shall abide by it.
Yah. The list of things which Sarb-Ox actually mandates (as far as
IT is
Thanks. As I just replied to Jonathan Raper, I'll advise my boss to check
with corporate attorneys to see what they say and then work to see that
everyone complies with that. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Malcolm Reitz [mailto:malcolm.re...@live.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010
It only affects twitter.com
It was a XSS exploit, that loaded random pages, and now some people were
adding porn etc.
It didnt effect any API aps.
And Twitter claim they have fixed it now.
Graeme
On 21 September 2010 15:30, Terry Dickson te...@treasurer.state.ks.uswrote:
Well I initially
Hardware already has EULAs.
There are all sorts of you agree not to reverse engineer wording in the
fine print of the warranty of the things you purchase today.
Merely purchasing hardware that has some functionality locked is no
indication that you have been cheated or ill-treated, unless said
This is a group of people exploiting a now patched vulnerability in cross-site
scripting. Not specifically a virus. It could easily have been used to spread a
click-less batch of malware or a site redirect, but for now it seems the issue
has been resolved by Twitter.
Thanks,
Jeff -
Hardware already has EULAs.
There are all sorts of you agree not to reverse engineer wording in the
fine print of the warranty of the things you purchase today.
Merely purchasing hardware that has some functionality locked is no
indication that you have been cheated or ill-treated, unless said
Hardware already has EULAs.
There are all sorts of you agree not to reverse engineer wording in the
fine print of the warranty of the things you purchase today.
Merely purchasing hardware that has some functionality locked is no
indication that you have been cheated or ill-treated, unless said
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:19 AM, John Aldrich
jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com wrote:
It wouldn't
surprise me if congress mandates SOX or something like it for *everyone*
eventually, publicly traded companies or not.
When that happens, deal with it then, especially as it's likely to
be
I love the sense of humor.
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:dhampsh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 9:41 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Cheap/Free POP3/SMTP Server?
Do any of these solutions have an option to insert excessively large
eMails signatures into them
I'm working for a private firm with no formal retention policy. Plus, due
to limited server storage we have to function with PST files. The big
problem is that these all become searchable when lawyers require all
documentation. What a pain! A mail archiving system would be a Godsend
but the
...each day has enough trouble of its own... :-)
Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
Technology Coordinator
Eagle Physicians Associates, PA
jra...@eaglemds.com
www.eaglemds.com
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 10:34 AM
To:
It's specific to the web pages of Twitter.com. Those using Twitter clients
never really hit the web site.
From: Terry Dickson [mailto:te...@treasurer.state.ks.us]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 10:31 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Twitter
Well I initially was the same way,
+1
*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
*Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
* *
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Jim Holmgren jholmg...@xlhealth.comwrote:
SOX does not say Thou shalt keep all email for X days/months/years.
It says Thou shalt have a retention
So much business is transacted through e-mail these days that a 90 day
retention policy seems impractical. If we tried to impose it here, I can
guarantee we'd have a revolt. Then if you forced it, people would start
squirreling away everything as hard copies and PDFs of e-mail, making it just
There is no need for any regulatory or industry compliance statute to
mandate *the specifics of* a set retention policy for information.
Yeah, there is the standard for financial data, but even that can be 3
years, 7 years or 10 years depending on the specifics of the data or segment
of the
Just ration your time a little differently the next time the lawyers need
data spread across 50 PSTs, and they may find it useful to deploy archiving.
*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile) http://XeeSM.com/AndrewBaker
*Exploiting Technology for Business Advantage...*
* *
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:35 AM,
Simply put, this isn't a physical conversation, making a comment that has
no point isn't necessary. If you don't have something 1) useful or 2) witty
to say, then don't, it's really not going to count against you. In fact,
you might say the opposite holds true. There are many times where I
Wait until you have to do a ediscovery. I'm betting they will change
their tune.
-Paul
From: Roger Wright [mailto:rhw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 9:36 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Email retention
I'm working for a private firm with no formal
We archive six months worth.
-Original Message-
From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 7:05 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Email retention
What's the standard for email retention for companies which are NOT publicly
traded?
Thanks to all who replied.
From: Rod Trent [mailto:rodtr...@myitforum.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 9:45 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Twitter
It's specific to the web pages of Twitter.com. Those using Twitter clients
never really hit the web site.
From: Terry Dickson
There's nothing new about this in case law whatsoever (at least from English
common law - I'm not familiar with continental law)
Licencing has been around for the better part of 200 years. The ability to
split the rights of property into distinct parts (e.g. you can give possession
to one
If in a rack, never add spaces between servers. Use blanks if you have empty
Us. If not, your cooling will suffer.
From: James Kerr [mailto:cluster...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 9:52 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Dumb DL360 Question
I'm thinking this isnt a
Well, I see what you're saying, but I've never actually MET most of our
sales reps... :-) We're talking outside sales reps for whom I have no
control over their computers, phones, etc. as that's not provided by the
company. Mostly it's stuff like advising them that their email box is
getting full
I agree... if you modify your Windows 7 install and it violates the EULA,
Microsoft has every right to say sorry... you violated the EULA, we're not
supporting it. Same goes for a bricked iphone. I also would not expect
Intel to support a hacked CPU. That being said, I think it's a crappy way
to
If I buy something, it's generally held that I can do what I want with it.
If you give me something, that's an entirely different situation. If I buy
the rights to something for a certain period, you can be darn sure that
there's an agreement I'm signing.
This specific issue of processors being
I think this has some very broad reaching implications.
If Intel is able to mass market and provide multiple levels of the chip at
specific prices, so that when I pay for a 350.00 chip I get a 350.00 speed, and
upgrade as I want. I don't have a problem with that. The spirit of my
purchase is
Still looking to insert the Viking Kittens? :-)
Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
Technology Coordinator
Eagle Physicians Associates, PA
jra...@eaglemds.com
www.eaglemds.com
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:dhampsh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21,
That's what I'm dealing with here... a bunch of individual PST files on
everyone's PCs. Which is what got me to thinking about needing a formal
retention policy.
From: Roger Wright [mailto:rhw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 10:36 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re:
All of what you're doing is employee management that should be the manager's
responsibility. You should be informing management that employees are
wasting resources, or providing reports that indiciate whether or not
employees are following policies. Managers should be then following up with
I am positive he still wants to insert them!
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Raper, Jonathan - Eagle
jra...@eaglemds.com wrote:
Still looking to insert the Viking Kittens? :-)
Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
Technology Coordinator
Eagle Physicians Associates, PA
jra...@eaglemds.com
*That being said, I think it's a crappy way to do business... sell a
crippled product then charge to fix it.*
Please show me in that article what language led you to conclude that the
product being sold is crippled
As an example, should you pay for a two core processor, and the price you
pay
Sounds like a plan to me. I'll start advising the individual managers that
their sales reps are filling up their email boxes and if they dont clear
out some of the space, said sales rep won't be able to receive emails from
customers or from the factory about sample requests, etc from their
***And Samsung comes out with the exact same TV with all of those
functions built in but they have gimped the HD function to 720 and the HDMI
outputs/inputs and disabled 3D as sold it for 1500.00 dollars and I could
afford it, purchased knowing it was that way, I would be fine with it. My
intent
Hi chaps,
The scripts that come with the XP version of GPMC are great for documenting the
GPOs, however they require the GPMC package to be installed. In Vista it
requires the Remote Server Management option to be installed.
I'd like to push these scripts out via our management app and run
Ok, definitely L5!
Jonathan L. Raper, A+, MCSA, MCSE
Technology Coordinator
Eagle Physicians Associates, PA
jra...@eaglemds.comBLOCKED::mailto:%20jra...@eaglemds.com
www.eaglemds.comBLOCKED::http://www.eaglemds.com/
From: Jonathan Link
If this is your action plan, expect it to go nowhere. You need to get a
member of management excited about email retention. You need a champion
with a seat at the table, otherwise this goes nowhere. Simpling handing
this off to management without education and without passion behind it is
This is akin (as I believe someone else mentioned previously) to the phone
system world.
It is commonplace, and has been for quite some time, that you buy a system, and
physically, it will do everything you need and then some.
If you want to use extra ports, you buy an upgrade license.
The
Heck. IBM would sell upgrades to their stuff 40 years ago that consisted
of a tech coming out and flipping a couple of DIP switches...
-sc
From: Justin Thomas [mailto:jat...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 5:07 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Intel wants to charge
You can run them on a 2003 server which has the GPMC installed. It doesn't
have to be an client desktop system (but it does have to be a 32-bit system)
.
I imagine that Process Monitor (SysInternals) will be useful in narrowing
this down further.
*ASB *(My XeeSM Profile)
Heh, I just wrote something similar... that's what I get for playing
catch up while on vacation...
We had to pay a license fee to enable the additional ports already
present on our Brocade FC switch
-sc
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent:
In my personal opinion, if certain features are disabled and the CPU is
not capable of running at it's full potential (barring any manufacturing
defects which would cause it to be sold as a lower performing chip, as is
common these days) then I, personally, would consider it crippled or
hamstrung
Wait a minute. Didn't we decide that a Flash-only solution was incompatible
with your mission of broad availability across multiple platforms? Wasn't
it discerned that a combination of Flash / Windows Media / Quicktime /
Silverlight / MP4 would best serve the interests and needs of all your
From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 September 2010 11:25 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Intel wants to charge to unlock features already on your CPU
If I buy something, it's generally held that I can do what I want with it.
When you say buy, are
1 - 100 of 236 matches
Mail list logo
