*
>
> Anyone idea how I screwed this up?
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
> *Posted At:* Friday, April 26, 2013 2:58 PM
>
> *Posted To:* itli...@imcu.com
> *Conversation:* Virtualization
> *Subject:* Re: Virtualization
>
To: itli...@imcu.com
Conversation: Virtualization
Subject: Re: Virtualization
No, I think he was saying you have a lot of verve...
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Steven M. Caesare
wrote:
You have nerve, saying that I have nerve.
-sc
From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com
, April 26, 2013 9:32 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: Virtualization
>
> ** **
>
> DOH! You went there, ouch! I thought only I had the nerve to do that.***
> *
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Webster
>
&g
Is it WebScale?
-sc
From: Pete Howard [mailto:pchow...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 9:32 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Virtualization
I have a clustered mobile san based on iphone farm storage with that same pdf.
From
.
…Tim
From: Pete Howard [mailto:pchow...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 6:32 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Virtualization
I have a clustered mobile san based on iphone farm storage with that same pdf.
From: Steven M. Caesare mailto:scaes
Tool has been moved to:
http://h71019.www7.hp.com/ActiveAnswers/us/en/sizers/unified-sizer-server-virtulization.html
Mark
From: rodtr...@myitforum.com [mailto:rodtr...@myitforum.com]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 5:19 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Virtualization
Hyper-V will be
DOH! You went there, ouch! I thought only I had the nerve to do that.
Thanks
Webster
From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 8:05 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Virtualization
I have a PDF on my SAN somewhere that addresses this.. I&#x
I have a clustered mobile san based on iphone farm storage with that same pdf.
From: Steven M. Caesare
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 9:05 AM
Subject: RE: Virtualization
I have a PDF on my SAN somewhere that addresses this
turn provide a very
detailed report (CPU/RAM/LAN/IOPS/Etc.) to get you in the right direction.
Good luck!
Feel free to hit me up if you have any other questions.
From: itli...@imcu.com [mailto:itli...@imcu.com]
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 8:19 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Virtuali
mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Posted At: Friday, April 26, 2013 7:45 AM
Posted To: itli...@imcu.com
Conversation: Virtualization
Subject: Re: Virtualization
I wouldn't particularly say any hypervisor would be your best bet with
this little info to go on
For instance XenServer might make sense if y
I wouldn't particularly say any hypervisor would be your best bet with this
little info to go on
For instance XenServer might make sense if you were running XenApp or
XenDesktop
VMWare is often the choice for "production" environments given the features
it has and the product maturity, but I
Hyper-V will be your best bet if you already have it bundled in your licensing.
Otherwise, if you choose to pay for a virt app, it might make sense to throw
the VMs into Azure.
HP has a sizing tool:
http://www.virtualizationadmin.com/blogs/conger/news/download-sizing-and-configuration-tool-f
Looking to virtualize 7 windows 2008 servers.
A couple of questions:
How do I size a Virtualized server and san?
Which virtual server software is best?
Hyper V, VMware, citrix
Any guidance in this area is appreciated...
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog!
ltiple VMs running as targets for RDP."
>
> You mean, GASP!, VDI???
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Webster
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 3:22 PM
>> To: NT System Admin Issues
&
[mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 4:22 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: virtualization question
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Stephen Holtz
wrote:
>
> Ok, another newbie to the world of virtualization here. I have a POS
> (point of sale) program that
:38 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: virtualization question
You’re wanting to run multiple VM servers on a single host, one for each iPad,
and then RDP into that VM using the iPad?
The multiple VMs are feasible, and accessing from RDP is certainly possible. I
don’t know about
, March 22, 2013 3:22 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: virtualization question
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Stephen Holtz
> wrote:
> >
> > Ok, another newbie to the world of virtualization here. I have a POS
> > (point of sale) program that
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Stephen Holtz
wrote:
>
> Ok, another newbie to the world of virtualization here. I have a POS
> (point of sale) program that I want to be able to be accessed by iPads using
> a RDP client. However, I would like to put multiple instances of the
&g
mwal...@mail.cvhp.org<mailto:mwal...@mail.cvhp.org>
From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 12:58 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: virtualization question
There are RDP clients for the iPad. Some free, some not, some good, some not.
Thanks
W
2:56 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: virtualization question
There's a Citrix Receiver for iPads - this might be a situation for XenApp
Essentials or Fundamentals or whatever its called (Web, please clarify)
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog!
There are RDP clients for the iPad. Some free, some not, some good, some not.
Thanks
Webster
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Subject: RE: virtualization question
You’re wanting to run multiple VM servers on a single host, one for each iPad,
and then RDP into that VM using
te: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 19:38:24
To: NT System Admin Issues
Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues"
Subject: RE: virtualization question
You’re wanting to run multiple VM servers on a single host, one for each iPad,
and then RDP into that VM using the iPad?
The multiple VMs are feasible,
Well XenApp/RDS etc. is application virtualization of a sort, just being
nit-picky here
Sent from my Blackberry, which may be an antique but delivers email RELIABLY
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Link
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 15:15:38
To: NT System Admin Issues
Reply-To: "NT S
...@addisonreserve.cc]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 1:59 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: virtualization question
I would like multiple iPads accessing the POS system software. Each iPad would
require their own connection and 'terminal' settings in the software.
Sent from my iPhone
On Ma
r. Thank you.
>
>
>
> From: Stephen Holtz [mailto:ste...@addisonreserve.cc]
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 1:59 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: virtualization question
>
> Ok, another newbie to the world of virtualization here. I have a POS (point
>
This doesn't strike me as a problem virtualization can solve, as stated.
As recommended, this is more of a Citrix or Terminal services issue and
whether you can do what you want is going to be governed by whether or not
the POS is capable of running concurrently in different sessions. This
r
o know. I don't really see a
> question in there.
>
>
>
> ASB
> http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker
> Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations & Information Security) for the
> SMB market…
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Stephen Holtz
o:ste...@addisonreserve.cc]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 1:59 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: virtualization question
Ok, another newbie to the world of virtualization here. I have a POS (point of
sale) program that I want to be able to be accessed by iPads using a RDP
client. However, I
RDS or Citrix XenApp? Or maybe App-V?
Sent from my Blackberry, which may be an antique but delivers email RELIABLY
-Original Message-
From: "Stephen Holtz"
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 13:58:42
To: NT System Admin Issues
Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues"
Subject: vir
Ok, another newbie to the world of virtualization here. I have a POS (point
of sale) program that I want to be able to be accessed by iPads using a RDP
client. However, I would like to put multiple instances of the program on a
server so that each iPad can access the POS program and keep it open
ge deleted snapshots while the VM is
running. One less advantage VMWare has (took MS long enough...).
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 9:08 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Virtualization in small office
On Mon, Mar 18,
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Andrew S. Baker wrote:
>> Every VM has identical virtual hardware.
>
> Minor caveat: Every VM within the same physical architecture (AMD vs
> Intel) has the identical virtual hardware.
Ohh... good point. I kind of knew that but the ramifications hadn't sunk in.
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Hank . wrote:
> I deal mostly with SMB. Virtualization is a great fit if you have a number
> of physical servers. But what about a single server situation?
That's pretty much the exact same scenario I was facing a year ago.
You may find the threa
My bad, I sit corrected!
From: Art DeKneef [mailto:art.dekn...@cox.net]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 10:08 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Virtualization in small office
Server 2012 Standard comes with TWO VM instances, not four. You're thinking of
Server 2008 R2 Enterprise.
15, 2013 9:19 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Virtualization in small office
I deal mostly with SMB. Virtualization is a great fit if you have a number
of physical servers.
But what about a single server situation? I have a couple replacements
coming up where there is a single serve
Server 2012 Standard comes with TWO VM instances, not four. You're thinking
of Server 2008 R2 Enterprise.
Art
From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 9:27 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Virtualization in small office
I VM even in s
divorce the DC from everything
else, since you can get away with small RAM/HDD requirements on a DC in a SMB.
Dave
From: Hank . [mailto:hgedr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 9:19 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Virtualization in small office
I deal mostly with SMB. Virtualiz
Virtualization Security
By: Dave Shackleford
Sybex Publishing
ISBN:978-1-118-28812-2
Covers ESXi, XenServer and HyperV.
EZ
Edward E. Ziots, CISSP, Security +, Network +
Security Engineer
Lifespan Organization
ezi...@lifespan.org
This electronic message and any attachments may be privileged and
Virtualization
Tight AD integration, for one. Lots of GP control, for another.
From: Harry Singh [mailto:hbo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 8:34 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: A question about Virtualization
Hopping on here late, but there isn't a local software client needed t
nks the SMB approach seems to work very efficiently for me.
---Blackberried
-Original Message-
From: Harry Singh
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 00:24:37
To: NT System Admin Issues
Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues"
Subject: Re: A question about
Virtualization
That's an eye ope
Singh
> *Date: *Tue, 6 Nov 2012 20:34:13 -0500
> *To: *NT System Admin Issues
> *ReplyTo: * "NT System Admin Issues" <
> ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>
> *Subject: *Re: A question about Virtualization
>
> Hopping on here late, but there isn't a
are effectively already installed and ready
for use.
---Blackberried
-Original Message-
From: Harry Singh
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 20:34:13
To: NT System Admin Issues
Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues"
Subject: Re: A question about
Virtualization
Hopping on here late, but there isn&
popular choice for the
> kind of deployments I do.
>
> I was just wondering how far the OP is wanting to take their entire
> "virtualization" strategy? Certainly once you get into the deeper parts of
> profile and application virtualization you can put together a solution
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Don Ely wrote:
> 3 hosts for 10 servers?!?!?!!?!?! I have 3 hosts and I run 120 servers on
> them SAN switches? Kool-aid taste good?
I do 120 VMs on 6 hosts, w/256G RAM ea. Soon to be 512G, so we can
run more VMs ... all backed by an FC SAN ...
~ Finally,
e: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 15:31:33
To: NT System Admin Issues
Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues"
Subject: RE: A question about
Virtualization
I will assist on the systems security review and risk management... you
can email me offline for assistance, if needed.
Z
Edward E. Ziots, CI
That about sums it up. And its all chargeable by the hour :-)
---Blackberried
-Original Message-
From: "itli...@imcu.com"
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 15:24:31
To: NT System Admin Issues
Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues"
Subject: RE: A question about
Virtualization
Pffft. I'm sure between the list members here if you need a "tiger team" to
sort your virtualization project we can put one together. I'm calling first
dibs on the application/user virtualization piece :-)
---Blackberried
-Original Message-
From: Sean Martin
Date
e-
> From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:pa...@mmcwm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 12:26 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: A question about Virtualization
>
> Boy, you've got that right. About 18 months ago, we started with about 30
> servers on
>
ReplyTo: * "NT System Admin Issues" <
> ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>
> *Subject: *Re: A question about Virtualization
>
> I've always run my servers with 'one box, one app' in mind - and
> virtualizing is saving us a lot of money for har
, 6 Nov 2012 11:09:24
To: NT System Admin Issues
Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues"
Subject: Re: A question about
Virtualization
I've always run my servers with 'one box, one app' in mind - and
virtualizing is saving us a lot of money for hardware, etc.
Now all I hav
t; -Original Message-
>> From: itli...@imcu.com [mailto:itli...@imcu.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 12:09 PM
>> To: NT System Admin Issues
>> Subject: RE: A question about Virtualization
>>
>> Thanks all,
>> I know I
Yes, 10 currently.
Good to know I should be able to scale to 120.
Thanks!
From: Don Ely [mailto:don@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 1:10 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: A question about Virtualization
3 hosts for 10 servers?!?!?!!?!?! I have 3
Mazzaccaro [mailto:david.mazzacc...@hudsonmobility.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 12:45 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: A question about Virtualization
Good luck!
Also consider "VM Sprawl".
You may have 6 servers now, but that could very easily double or triple.
(testing, backup,
esday, November 06, 2012 12:09 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: A question about Virtualization
>
> Thanks all,
> I know I will have 6 servers to virtualize. Outside of that I am not
> sure. I am waiting on specs.
> I will look through archives and trying and get more
esday, November 06, 2012 12:42 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: A question about Virtualization
No client at all? Just a shortcut to an executable? Sounds interesting.
---Blackberried
From: John Cook mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org>>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 17:06:
2012 12:09 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: A question about Virtualization
Thanks all,
I know I will have 6 servers to virtualize. Outside of that I am not
sure. I am waiting on specs.
I will look through archives and trying and get more info going forward.
-Original Message
No client at all? Just a shortcut to an executable? Sounds interesting.
---Blackberried
-Original Message-
From: John Cook
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 17:06:16
To: NT System Admin Issues
Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues"
Subject: RE: A question about
Virtualization
Thinapp is
, November 6, 2012 11:57 AM
Posted To: itli...@imcu.com
Conversation: A question about Virtualization
Subject: Re: A question about Virtualization
Hey David.
My recommendation: Start small. Find a desktop with a VM enabled chip
and create a little VM server. All of the major players have a free
version to
o: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: A question about Virtualization
I haven't done much ThinApp, to be fair. How easy is it to package stuff up? I
find App-V dead easy, but then again it was the first thing I used for it. My
other main packaging experience was with Citrix Streaming, and that a
* Training!
From: itli...@imcu.com [mailto:itli...@imcu.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 11:28 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: A question about Virtualization
I have no experience with Virtualized anything.
I have read VMware is better than Citrix.
What kind of hardwar
ix plugins like an normal installed app.
App-V also integrates nicely with AppSense and particularly their
Personalization Server piece, which makes it another popular choice for the
kind of deployments I do.
I was just wondering how far the OP is wanting to take their entire
"virtualization&quo
Virtualization, I hear.)
Linux: ProxMox VE (Web-based VM, but no Desktop Virtualization option)
After you get your feet wet, you will then start to see what kind of investment
you are in for. You'll have to start thinking of large servers to host VMs,
with lots of processors/memory, n
: A question about Virtualization
I have no experience with Virtualized anything.
I have read VMware is better than Citrix.
What kind of hardware do I put all of this on?
A Blade server with a SAN back end?
I really have no opinions or experience on any of this.
Please don't flame
Server virtualization?
Desktop virtualization?
Application virtualization?
Profile/user virtualization?
All different parts of the virtualization tree.
If you are talking server, VMWare and Microsoft are probably the biggest
players
Desktops - I wouldn't look any further than Citrix
Applic
625.1438 | c – 312.731.3132*
>
> * *
>
> *From:* Robert Cato [mailto:cato.rob...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 03, 2012 2:43 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: New to virtualization
>
> ** **
>
>
>
> We priced NetApp and EMC a c
o price out a Netapp. (I've
> also heard some good things about Dell's Compellent line.)
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Stefan Jafs [mailto:stefan.j...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 03, 2012 1:43 PM
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: New to virtua
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 03, 2012 1:43 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: New to virtualization
>
> ** **
>
> I'm just in the middle up upgrading from an 4 year old HP EVA 4000 to an
> $130k NetApp solution, this includes 2 new DL380 G7 192 GB of r
Thx
I actually did bring that up... and they said for $30 you grab a few
extras to have on hand.
From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 1:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: New to virtualization
one thing to remember about USB memory
EMC VNX5300 but
the consultant said he could also price out a Netapp. (I've also heard some
good things about Dell's Compellent line.)
From: Stefan Jafs [mailto:stefan.j...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 1:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: New to virtualization
I
Sent:* Thursday, March 15, 2012 10:44 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: New to virtualization
>
> ** **
>
> The reality here is that you’re not going to spend $130k on a
> virtualisation solution and *not* want to add more VM’s,
>
>
Yup. We have 5 HP hosts and each one boots off a USB. And, yes, I was
surprised when the installer told me that.
From: Gary Slinger [mailto:gary.slin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 12:58 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: New to virtualization
Speed. Very common
mmon practice?
>>
>> What are the pros/cons to USB stick vs a pair of mirrored drives on the
>> hosts?
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
>> *Sent:* Thursday, March 15, 2012 10:44 AM
>> *To:* NT Sy
]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 12:50 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: New to virtualization
I am still researching and meeting w/ vendors.
One thing that has just come up w/ a particular vendor.
They are telling me that they would put in 3 hosts, w/ no hard drives and that
VMware would run
is common practice?
>
> What are the pros/cons to USB stick vs a pair of mirrored drives on the
> hosts?
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 15, 2012 10:44 AM
> *To:*
ffice)
317.447.6014 (fax)
HARRISON COLLEGE
From: David Mazzaccaro [mailto:david.mazzacc...@hudsonmobility.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 12:50 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: New to virtualization
I am still researching and meeting w/ vendors.
One thing that has just come up
Speed. Very common.
-Original Message-
From: "David Mazzaccaro"
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 12:50:19
To: NT System Admin Issues
Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues"
Subject: RE: New to virtualization
I am still researching and meeting w/ vendors.
One thing that h
pros/cons to USB stick vs a pair of mirrored drives on the
hosts?
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 10:44 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: New to virtualization
The reality here is that you're not going to spend $130k
12 14:03
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: New to virtualization
I admit it was a while back, it may have changed, or my understanding was
incorrect. Or someone told me that and I read it that way. In any event, I
think 12 total servers for his environment may be a bit low... Or it may
>
> Ken
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, 15 March 2012 1:24 AM
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: New to virtualization
>
> ** **
>
> It's even a more (unenforcebly) stringent th
From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 9:32 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: New to virtualization
You'll also want to avoid sprawl... The happy medium will depend on many
factors, but I rarely end up with 1 for 1 functions ex
Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 15 March 2012 1:24 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: New to virtualization
It's even a more (unenforcebly) stringent than that. If you run 4 VMs on 3
hosts with enterprise server on each host, you power down two and do a s
server (dedicated)
>
> MAS200 (also Citrix licensing server, web interface server, terminal
> services profile storage)
>
> Document imaging (also my 2nd DC, and print server)
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* J
Organization
ezi...@lifespan.org
From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:paul.hutchi...@mira.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 1:26 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: New to virtualization
If you are looking at DR and replication DEFINITELY <- notice big
capital bold letters there :) l
Yes, they told me that is part of the setup.
From: Matthew B Ames [mailto:matthew.a...@qinetiq.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 10:40 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: New to virtualization
Best hope your NetApp is connected via some means to the internet (or
whatever
Subject: RE: New to virtualization
"NetApp makes good SANs, and their support is great! (A drive starts to go
bad, and you get an email from support asking where to ship it to, etc.
Sometimes that is the first and perhaps only indication something is going
wrong.)"
That is GREAT to
virtualization
We do exactly this at %dayjob%. It’s been a bummer on the couple of occasions
that ESX had had an issue and the only way to get to that vCenter box is to
take the other VM’s offline (or rather that’s how my ESX guy explained it to
me). That was a couple years ago so newer versions
r, web interface server, terminal
> services profile storage)
>
> Document imaging (also my 2nd DC, and print server)
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 13, 2012 2:49 PM
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
&
rsions may have addressed this.
From: Damien Solodow [mailto:damien.solo...@harrison.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 2:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: New to virtualization
In a VMware environment VirtualCenter (or vCenter Server) is the management box
for handling all your VMw
Excellent!
Thank you very much.
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 5:04 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: New to virtualization
If you use VMWare, you'll have a VirtualCenter system that manages all
of your hosts and clusters.
[mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 2:49 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: New to virtualization
If I were doing licensing from scratch, I'd go Datacenter, even
accounting for the CPU licensing, it's not all that much more. The
ability to add and move server
Issues
Subject: RE: New to virtualization
Haven’t discussed clustering yet.
I will probably look at a DR planning first? co-location or replicating to
another of my offices maybe?
WOW – I just noticed all the replies trickling in due to the delays of this
list.
THANKS EVERYONE! This really
Thanks for the link!
I will inquire about virtual clustering, initially I was just thinking
of hosting stand alone hosts...
From: Steven Peck [mailto:sep...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 2:02 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: New to virtualization
The others have
Carl Webster
>
> Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional
>
> http://www.CarlWebster.com <http://www.carlwebster.com/>
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
> *Subject:* Re: New to virtualization
>
> ** **
>
>
p 5.6 licenses set them back
a good bit of money.
Carl Webster
Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional
http://www.CarlWebster.com<http://www.carlwebster.com/>
From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com]
Subject: Re: New to virtualization
90 users per VM is pretty damn good, but pack
t;
> Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional
>
> http://www.CarlWebster.com <http://www.carlwebster.com/>
>
> From: Andrew Baker
>
> Subject: Re: New to virtualization
>
> Citrix loves RAM too. Going with 6-8GB and x64 will improve performance.
>
> **
It is indeed
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership for Strong Families
From: Gary Slinger [mailto:gary.slin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 08:55 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: New to virtualization
I don't have a supporting link for this handy, but not
ating ID) works extremely well.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Gary Slinger wrote:
> I don't have a supporting link for this handy, but not only 'can' you run
> vCenter in a VM, that is currently VMware's declared best practice.
>
> G
>
> --
> Ga
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Mayo, Bill wrote:
>> “NetApp makes good SANs, and their support is great! (A drive starts to go
>> bad, and you get an email from support asking where to ship it to, etc.
>> Sometimes that is the first and perhaps only indication something is going
>> wrong.)”
>
>
I don't have a supporting link for this handy, but not only 'can' you run
vCenter in a VM, that is currently VMware's declared best practice.
G
--
Gary K. Slinger
Practice/Content Manager, Virtualization Services Practice
Mainline Information Systems
Office: 727
Absolutely. Once you have virtualization it's so damn easy to just
bring up a new server when needed. You do have beware server sprawl,
and more VMs means more machines to monitor, patch, etc., but the value
of having the flexibility to move machines around, to quickly provision
new server
1 - 100 of 404 matches
Mail list logo
