+1 for your thoughts.
2012/5/21 Graham Lauder y...@apache.org
Hi.
2012/5/21 Paulo de Souza Lima paulo.s.l...@varekai.org
2012/5/21 Albino Biasutti Neto biasut...@gmail.com
Hi.
2012/5/20 Raul Pacheco da Silva raulpachecodasi...@gmail.com
Yes,
Sounds good for the improvement, and I think, can we combine the 2 feature
proposed, that
1 Add the search field in navigator to search by key word, like described
in Bug 118639, but more is that we can search not only headings, but
inserted objects with name and captions;
2 In navigator, when we
Right,
the attribute dynamicHeight is true. In which case is a header not dynamic? I
tried to create a template with a ott, but when I load this ott the header is
still dynamic. I like the idea using the viewCursor but I only know how to
create it by a textViewsupplier and not from my text
Hi Armin:
I ask you some question as below:
In module svg, have two Interfaces, one is XSVGPrinter, the other is
XSVGWriter.
1) Can I use these interfaces, output Bitmap file?
2) under the module svg, in the file of svgimagenode.cxx,
void extractFromGraphic (
const Graphic
Hi,
On 22.05.2012 18:21, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
[snip]
I would prefer the static solution as a short-term one which could be
working
next week.
For the dynamic solution a script is needed. I have no
Right,
the attribute dynamicHeight is true. In which case is a header not dynamic? I
tried to create a template with a ott, but when I load this ott the header is
still dynamic. I like the idea using the viewCursor but I only know how to
create it by a textViewsupplier and not from my
Hi.
2012/5/23 Graham Lauder g.a.lau...@gmail.com
Sorry, I'm not understanding.
Have you prepared some questions or
are you preparing some questions and
what sort of details are we talking about.
I'm preparing some questions, the detalis is of questions.
Suggetion of site for
Sorry, there was a problem in the browser!
Hi.
2012/5/23 Graham Lauder g.a.lau...@gmail.com
Sorry, I'm not understanding.
Have you prepared some questions or
are you preparing some questions and
what sort of details are we talking about.
I'm preparing some questions, the detalis is of
Hi,
There are a lot of CWSs in http://hg.services.openoffice.org/. The files
are still under LGPL3. Some of these CWSs are relevant for LO and for
AOO. It it possible to get these CWSs under APL2.0?
Which CWSs LibreOffice needs, I would have to ask. I know for example
their are interested
Hi jianlizhao,
it is still not clear to me, what you want to do:
Do you want to write macros or extensions and need help to use the API?
or
Do you want to work on the core itself. If it is this, what do you want
to do? What feature do you want to implement or what bug do you want to fix?
As one member of the team, I feel proud that people missed the mail merge
feature ^o*...although the code can't be applied to our code base, the
design does. We can refer to the best from the design, and improve the mail
merge function here.
Hi Helen
Congratulations and well done, you and
On 5/23/2012 05:16, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
[snip]
Thus, I will do the following:
- Creation of a complete XML document
- Include entries for at least one languages for which we have currently
no AOO 3.4 installation package.
- Providing the XML document and possible variants on
Hi jianlizhao,
On 23.05.2012 11:06, jianlizhao wrote:
Hi Armin:
I ask you some question as below:
In module svg, have two Interfaces, one is XSVGPrinter, the other is
XSVGWriter.
Both are interfaces, XSVGPrinter is not used at all and XSVGWriter is
the current SVG export which has
fabian ,
the missing millimeters comes from the style and the fond. I
suppose the coordinates off the vieuwcursor are calculated from the
baseline , Styles can have TOP, BOTTOM , LEFT and RIGHT margins...
Right,
the attribute dynamicHeight is true. In which case is a header not
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Albino Biasutti Neto
biasut...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi.
2012/5/20 Paulo de Souza Lima paulo.s.l...@varekai.org
I think you mean How old are you? =)
Sorry, thanks.
Maybe we could contribute to improve those questions. My 2 cents:
Are
2012/5/23 Graham Lauder g.a.lau...@gmail.com
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Albino Biasutti Neto
biasut...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi.
2012/5/20 Paulo de Souza Lima paulo.s.l...@varekai.org
I think you mean How old are you? =)
Sorry, thanks.
Maybe we could contribute
In case folks haven't seen this:
http://legal-discuss.markmail.org/thread/mleqsm636zf5fqia
Which points to:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Relicensing
So it looks like there will be plenty of code sharing! 8-
- Shane
Hi Shane,
Thanks for the links.
It's good. I like it.
:)
Thanks,
khirano
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
In case folks haven't seen this:
http://legal-discuss.markmail.org/thread/mleqsm636zf5fqia
Which points to:
Hi, all,
I just run a query to check all the 3.4.1 candidates (
3.4.1_release_blocker is + or ? ), and got the snapshot list.
And from them, I found the following defects need owner. So I updated the
3.4.1 planning wiki with them (
Hi,
I have to create a patch for CVE-2012-1149 for OOo 3.2.1. I had a look
at the AOO sources, but I couldn't find any relevant commits. Could
somebody point me to the right direction?
Greetings
Andor Ertsey
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 13:54 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
There are a lot of CWSs in http://hg.services.openoffice.org/. The files
are still under LGPL3. Some of these CWSs are relevant for LO and for
AOO. It it possible to get these CWSs under APL2.0?
Right ! so I've been delaying
Hi.
2012/5/23 Paulo de Souza Lima paulo.s.l...@varekai.org
2012/5/23 Graham Lauder g.a.lau...@gmail.com
Scaled response and open response questions are always better in terms
of
data
that is dealing with aesthetics and feelings. The art with these answers
is
in the interpretation.
See below
(Nonsense words? iPad's spellchecker.)
-- Louis Suárez-Potts
On 2012-05-23, at 9:55, Kazunari Hirano khir...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Shane,
Thanks for the links.
It's good. I like it.
What do you like?
:)
Thanks,
khirano
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Shane Curcuru
Hi Louis,
We can start sharing codes.
I like it.
:)
Thanks,
khirano
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts lui...@gmail.com wrote:
See below
(Nonsense words? iPad's spellchecker.)
-- Louis Suárez-Potts
On 2012-05-23, at 9:55, Kazunari Hirano khir...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 23:13 +0900, Kazunari Hirano wrote:
Hi Louis,
We can start sharing codes.
That is not really what it says, nor what it means IMO.
With regard to the MPL specifically, I asked during a session on
licensing at the recent Apache Barcamp the question of mixing MPL within
an
On 23.05.2012 15:43, Shane Curcuru wrote:
In case folks haven't seen this:
http://legal-discuss.markmail.org/thread/mleqsm636zf5fqia
Which points to:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Relicensing
So it looks like there will be plenty of code sharing! 8-
In both directions?
Hi,
Thx for the update.
I am currently doing the same in parallel, but you were faster.
I will come up with my evaluation soon.
Best regards, Oliver.
On 23.05.2012 15:55, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
Hi, all,
I just run a query to check all the 3.4.1 candidates (
3.4.1_release_blocker is + or ? ),
On 23.05.2012 16:00, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 13:54 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
There are a lot of CWSs in http://hg.services.openoffice.org/. The files
are still under LGPL3. Some of these CWSs are relevant for LO and for
AOO. It it possible to get these CWSs under APL2.0?
Hi,
here is my overview.
Sorry for my top posting. All issues mentioned by Shenfeng Liu are covered,
except:
- 119292 - already fixed in branch for AOO 3.4.1
- 119367 - it is a closed duplicate
I searched for issues which have release blocker flag 3.4.1 set or requested or
a blocker severity
Hi, Oliver,
I'm the early bird because of the time zone. :) But you got a complete
list. Thanks!
My thoughts below for each defects...
- Simon
2012/5/23 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com
Hi,
here is my overview.
Sorry for my top posting. All issues mentioned by Shenfeng
Hi Andre,
On 2012-05-23 at 16:40 +0200, Andre Fischer wrote:
I can not find the following child work spaces on
http://hg.services.openoffice.org/. Can you point me to the right place?
So it seems that some of them are integrated in the OOO340_m1 already.
The following are the integration
On 05/20/2012 11:54 AM, Wolf Halton wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Albino Biasutti Neto
biasut...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi.
2012/5/20 Paulo de Souza Limapaulo.s.l...@varekai.org
I think you mean How old are you? =)
Sorry, thanks.
Maybe we could contribute to improve those
Jan Holesovsky schrieb:
Hi Andre,
On 2012-05-23 at 16:40 +0200, Andre Fischer wrote:
I can not find the following child work spaces on
http://hg.services.openoffice.org/. Can you point me to the right place?
So it seems that some of them are integrated in the OOO340_m1 already.
The
FWIW,
And with the traditional IANAL disclaimer:
On 05/23/12 08:43, Shane Curcuru wrote:
In case folks haven't seen this:
http://legal-discuss.markmail.org/thread/mleqsm636zf5fqia
Which points to:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Relicensing
There are no details of the
Nelson--
I don't know if I can help much with this, but the most recent install
guide is at:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO
and I do recall at first this very solenv was causing issues though I
don't recall what the solution was.
Buildbot info is
Someone said my name? I don't know if I can help, but I will try.
On 23.05.2012 17:33, Kay Schenk wrote:
Nelson--
I don't know if I can help much with this, but the most recent install
guide is at:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO
and I do recall at
:618
code
.INCLUDE : $(posix_PWD)/$(OUT)/inc/myworld.mk
code
Looks fine to me... that's why I said it is most likely a string
replacement or var somewhere which is being twisted around by
something I couldn't identify yet.
Whatever it is, it's messing with parent directory and file name
As part of the transfer of the web properties of OOo to the ASF, the set
of related domains has also been offered to ASF.
We (PPMC) need to decide what we want to do with the related domains.
There are three obvious options available to us:
* Ignore and let the domains expire
* Continue to
On 05/23/12 11:21, Andrew Rist wrote:
As part of the transfer of the web properties of OOo to the ASF, the
set of related domains has also been offered to ASF.
We (PPMC) need to decide what we want to do with the related domains.
There are three obvious options available to us:
* Ignore and
On 23.05.2012 18:02, Nelson Marques wrote:
:618
code
.INCLUDE : $(posix_PWD)/$(OUT)/inc/myworld.mk
code
Looks fine to me... that's why I said it is most likely a string
replacement or var somewhere which is being twisted around by
something I couldn't identify yet.
That is really strange.
Hi Pedro,
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 10:36 -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
There are no details of the relicensing process but doesn't look
very clean to me:
- They are basically assuming that OOo 3.3.x (where they started
has been relicensed under ALv2, which is not true.
This is
[nmarques@localhost solenv]$ dmake -v
dmake: Openning [/usr/share/startup/startup.mk] for read (success)
dmake: Openning [/usr/share/startup/config.mk] for read (success)
dmake: Parsing include file [/usr/share/startup/config.mk].
dmake: /usr/share/startup/config.mk: line 3: Warning: --
It depends on what the PPMC thinks, and also how popular the links to
those existing domains are. IF any of them still have much attention
publicly, then it's probably worth keeping them for the time being,
pointing to an appropriate place on oo.o.
- Shane, who had one of his previous unused
On 05/23/2012 02:16 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 22.05.2012 18:21, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote:
[snip]
I would prefer the static solution as a short-term one which could be
working
next week.
For
On 05/23/2012 10:46 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
It depends on what the PPMC thinks, and also how popular the links to
those existing domains are. IF any of them still have much attention
publicly, then it's probably worth keeping them for the time being,
pointing to an appropriate place on oo.o.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Andrew Rist andrew.r...@oracle.com wrote:
* Ignore and let the domains expire
* Continue to register to block squatting, but do no more
* Continue to register and forward to oo.o
I think the third option is the best. All those domains serve a purpose, to
On May 23, 2012, at 10:56 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Andrew Rist andrew.r...@oracle.com wrote:
* Ignore and let the domains expire
* Continue to register to block squatting, but do no more
* Continue to register and forward to oo.o
I think the third
On 2012-05-23, at 10:13 , Kazunari Hirano wrote:
Hi Louis,
We can start sharing codes.
The licenses would seem to permit it, as MPLv2 is seemingly compatible with
AL2. However, the language of this page,
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Relicensing , is less
encouraging,
On 2012-05-23, at 10:20 , drew wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 23:13 +0900, Kazunari Hirano wrote:
Hi Louis,
We can start sharing codes.
That is not really what it says, nor what it means IMO.
Quite.
With regard to the MPL specifically, I asked during a session on
licensing at the
Am 05/23/2012 08:03 PM, schrieb Dave Fisher:
On May 23, 2012, at 10:56 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Andrew Ristandrew.r...@oracle.com wrote:
* Ignore and let the domains expire
* Continue to register to block squatting, but do no more
* Continue to register
On 05/23/12 11:49, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Pedro,
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 10:36 -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
There are no details of the relicensing process but doesn't look
very clean to me:
- They are basically assuming that OOo 3.3.x (where they started
has been relicensed under ALv2, which is
Um, guys? As this concerns a LibreOffice webpage over which the AOO
committers largely have no control, is it better to have this argument
here or on a LibreOffice-related list?
Don
LO(L).
Lots of Love,
Louis
On 2012-05-23, at 15:58 , Donald Whytock wrote:
Um, guys? As this concerns a LibreOffice webpage over which the AOO
committers largely have no control, is it better to have this argument
here or on a LibreOffice-related list?
Don
On 05/23/12 14:58, Donald Whytock wrote:
Um, guys? As this concerns a LibreOffice webpage over which the AOO
committers largely have no control, is it better to have this argument
here or on a LibreOffice-related list?
Don
Hmm.. yes that was my last comment :).
(back to coding)
Pedro.
2012/5/23 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com:
Hi,
here is my overview.
Sorry for my top posting. All issues mentioned by Shenfeng Liu are covered,
except:
- 119292 - already fixed in branch for AOO 3.4.1
- 119367 - it is a closed duplicate
I searched for issues which have
On 23/05/12 16:00, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 13:54 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
There are a lot of CWSs in http://hg.services.openoffice.org/. The files
are still under LGPL3. Some of these CWSs are relevant for LO and for
AOO. It it possible to get these CWSs under
Dear Apache guys,
regarding the issue discussed below (and in other mails with) I still
did not get any official response, so far. Please change that!
Annoyed regards,
Carsten Otto
- Forwarded message from Carsten Otto o...@informatik.rwth-aachen.de -
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 10:28:37
http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html#notes
The above lets you download an Ubuntu, Debian etc installation.
However, at least for Ubuntu there seems to be a problem.
I have a headless server.
I've downloaded the Linux x86-64 DEB
http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html
But that
Hi, All
I would like to ask what components of the Apache openoffice 3.4 does not
belong to the Apachethe license 2.0.
if remove those components, and the AOO3.4 can still work? , such as
conversion ppt to PDF such functionality.
Best Regards
Brian Fu
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 09:43:43AM -0400, Shane Curcuru wrote:
In case folks haven't seen this:
http://legal-discuss.markmail.org/thread/mleqsm636zf5fqia
Which points to:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Relicensing
So it looks like there will be plenty of code
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Regina Henschel
rb.hensc...@t-online.de wrote:
Hi,
There are a lot of CWSs in http://hg.services.openoffice.org/. The files are
still under LGPL3. Some of these CWSs are relevant for LO and for AOO. It it
possible to get these CWSs under APL2.0?
Who is
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:14 AM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 15:29 +0800, zhangjf wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 5:23 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 10:30 +0800, zhangjf wrote:
Some 3rd party codes are not included in this repository,
On 5/23/2012 4:06 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Regina Henschel
rb.hensc...@t-online.de wrote:
Hi,
There are a lot of CWSs in http://hg.services.openoffice.org/. The files are
still under LGPL3. Some of these CWSs are relevant for LO and for AOO. It it
possible to get
I have already put the confirm and build successful messages in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4799.
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:14 AM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 15:29 +0800, zhangjf
Let me try to translate the message below.
Hi Armin,
I see two interfaces XSVGPrinter and XSVGWriter in svg mdoule
Could they be used for graphic in Bitmap format?
For function extractFromGraphic in svgimagenode
void extractFromGraphic (
const Graphic rGraphic
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 3:29 AM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
--- Sab 19/5/12, Regina Henschel ha scritto:
...
Hi,
I have attached the patch to
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=3582.
If someone might look at it?
KG01 - How might the non-technical folks, such
Regina,
If you are looking at updating the About content and behaviour, perhaps we
could explore ways to promote our social media assets.
Just a thought.
Regards,
Kevin
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Regina Henschel
rb.hensc...@t-online.dewrote:
Hi,
蜗牛 schrieb:
how to invoke
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
In case folks haven't seen this:
http://legal-discuss.markmail.org/thread/mleqsm636zf5fqia
Which points to:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Relicensing
So it looks like there will be plenty of
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Juergen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2012 um 00:18 schrieb Paulo de Souza Lima:
2012/5/18 Juergen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com
Am Freitag, 18. Mai 2012 um 15:22 schrieb Paulo de Souza Lima:
2012/5/18 Jürgen
KG01 - UX will put this design exploration in our backlog and will look to
find some volunteers to work with development.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:34 PM, zhangying tldyzem tldy...@gmail.comwrote:
Sounds good for the improvement, and I think, can we combine the 2 feature
proposed, that
1 Add
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:20 AM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 23:13 +0900, Kazunari Hirano wrote:
Hi Louis,
We can start sharing codes.
That is not really what it says, nor what it means IMO.
With regard to the MPL specifically, I asked during a session on
KG01 - See comments inline.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Graham Lauder y...@apache.org wrote:
As one member of the team, I feel proud that people missed the mail merge
feature ^o*...although the code can't be applied to our code base, the
design does. We can refer to the best from the
Yes, I agree with Kevin. We need to understand who uses AOO，and their use
scenario or story.
User research work is very good and also important to us to know users and
improve the product. Let's work together in UX wiki and start exploration.
:)
2012/5/24 Kevin Grignon kevingrignon...@gmail.com
Hi Rob,
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 22:31 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
It seems to be based on an interesting theory about what an SGA
actually does. It seems to assume that the SGA itself puts the code
under the Apache License.
Ah - I can see how you get there from the pre-amble; the
Hi Kevin,
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 09:58:04AM +0800, Kevin Grignon wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 3:29 AM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
--- Sab 19/5/12, Regina Henschel ha scritto:
...
Hi,
I have attached the patch to
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=3582.
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 22:51 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
There is very little code of value in AOO that can simply be copied
as-is into LO and then never touched again. Typically the code will
need to be modified when initially merged into LO. But then, as bugs
are fixed or the feature is
Rob makes some important points. Here's my analysis based on that:
1. Oracle did not put anything under the ALv2 with its Software Grant
Agreement. It granted the ASF a nonexclusive license (and to none others that
we are aware of), to use the identified code in a particular way, including
77 matches
Mail list logo
