Hello Justin,
Thursday, January 11, 2007, 2:56:56 AM, you wrote:
>>
>>
>> The problem is then when using WebDAV from Windows XP over https or
>> http with authorization then for example double-clicking on picture
>> won't open preview - however I can copy file to local storage from web
>> dav and
Hello Robert,
Thursday, January 11, 2007, 4:17:02 AM, you wrote:
RM> Hello Justin,
RM> Thursday, January 11, 2007, 3:09:31 AM, you wrote:
JE>> On 1/10/07, Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> With such configure (openldap) it works fine
>>> bash-3.00# ./configure --prefix=/opt/apache
[b][u][i]LRG skeleton hoodie LRG skeleton hoody LRG skeleton hoodies LRG
clothes[/i][/u][/b]
[b]LRG dead serious hoodie LRG skeleton hoody LRG skeleton hoodie jacket[/b]
http://wholesale-distributors-dropship-suppliers-sources.com/
http://wholesale-distributors-dropship-suppliers-sources.com/
htt
Hey,
Given how quiet things were during the holidays, I've merged 2 weeks together in
the latest edition of the weekly news. Hopefully we're now back on track,
apologies for the delays.
Glynn
==
> Stephen Hahn mailed [1] discussing the need for restricted integration builds
> of
> OpenSolaris
Heh,
Solaris will run 99% of the applications that are available for Linux,
like MySQL, PostgreSQL, PHP, Apache2, gcc, Firefox, Mozilla, Evolution,
XMMS, X-Chat, etc. etc.
And if you can't get it working under Solaris, you can always try Centos
3.8 in a BrandZ Linux zone :P
DSL
__
Heh,
Solaris will run 99% of the applications that are available for Linux,
like MySQL, PostgreSQL, PHP, Apache2, gcc, Firefox, Mozilla, Evolution,
XMMS, X-Chat, etc. etc.
And if you can't get it working under Solaris, you can always try Centos
3.8 :P
DSL
_
>
> http://partneradvantage.sun.com/catalog/search/ProductTab.jsf shows
> 25 entries per page, for a total of 7025 entries.
>
>
Here is one that gives away over 1600 software titles :
http://partneradvantage.sun.com/catalog/search/ProductDetail.jsf?product_id=4032609
:-)
Dennis
_
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007, noel wrote:
Hmm, I was just checking out solaris cuz sun says its the most secure
os. But my real question is why people are leaving linux for a foreign
environment like solaris. It seems that there is somewhat less software
available for solaris. (I don't mind paying for s
noel wrote:
so what should we do to get this cheat sheet goin? What would be the most
important commands to put? and which config files are also significant and
different for administering the system?
all this depends on what you need to find out. Perhaps it would help
to start by asking what c
On 1/14/07, noel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
great.
so what should we do to get this cheat sheet goin? What would be the most
important commands to put? and which config files are also significant and
different for administering the system?
Hmm, I was just checking out solaris cuz sun says its
UNIX admin wrote:
I think we need to point out to our Linux friends
that once they do this
hat will will pollute the root directory with crud.
Things like the
bash_history and if they actually login vie
dtlogin/gdm or whatever that
they will really bork it up wwith junk.
That's why I think tha
great.
so what should we do to get this cheat sheet goin? What would be the most
important commands to put? and which config files are also significant and
different for administering the system?
Hmm, I was just checking out solaris cuz sun says its the most secure os. But
my real question is
Hey,
Apologies for the delays in the weekly news - working on getting through the
mail archives over the last couple of weeks and summarizing the older news.
Glynn
==
> Derek Cicero announced [1] that Solaris Express Community Release build 54
> was now available, introducing some useful 'late
FYI :
1,522 software packages in the stable tree have been released to all
the mirror sites.
See http://www.blastwave.org for the details.
Dennis Clarke
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Well, I'm not a marketing person, but in Sun's product line, its very light
(think V125, then V240, then T2000, then X4500/X4600, then Ex000, then Exx000,
its pretty light on most things)
Also Apple's naming of the Mini, state or understate what the product is and
let the market place be wowed
Think Apple Mac Mini with dual or quad ethernet and 5 "flash" drives (for the
reason mentioned in the article, and there current size and reliability
concerns)
Also I'm didn't won't to pick a "flash" technology, because I don't know the
relative pros/cons of each of the more than half-a-dozen u
> That looks like a very interesting product. My first
> comment would be the name. This will be a pretty
> powerful box for the market you are going for, so I
> don't see "lite" as an appropriate term. I'm sure
> Sun's marketing folks can come up with something
> nice. ;-)
I'd call it "IPX2", but
> So at the end of the day I guess its a "server
> appliance" that I'm after, flexible for the array of
> tasks that servers may have to perform, but quiet and
> cost-effective to market that its designed to sell
> into.
So what you're looking for is a SPARCStation IPX form factor system with a
b
Hmmm...
And the MS-WIN GUI is only "easy to use" for the people who spend a long
time to learn it's oddness.
Naturlich. Deutsch ist besser als Englisch. Also, wir mussen Deustch
sprechen. Vielleicht, die Welt wird eines Tages die Wahrheit wissen!
The same can be said for English...so why d
> Yes, there's an RFE in progress to make /root root's
> home directory.
Now THAT really stinks!
There is *nothing wrong* with .files in /!
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.
> I think we need to point out to our Linux friends
> that once they do this
> hat will will pollute the root directory with crud.
> Things like the
> bash_history and if they actually login vie
> dtlogin/gdm or whatever that
> they will really bork it up wwith junk.
>
> That's why I think that
That looks like a very interesting product. My first comment would be the name.
This will be a pretty powerful box for the market you are going for, so I don't
see "lite" as an appropriate term. I'm sure Sun's marketing folks can come up
with something nice. ;-)
Thinking about it some more, it
> The reason why Windows is so easy to install is only
> because it
> comes pre-installed.
>
> Casper
> ___
> opensolaris-discuss mailing list
> opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
>
This (i.e., Windows is easy to install) is true only to a very limite
>> No Sir, I don't think so.
>>
>> I would simply employ more of the RBAC features and perhaps create a user
>> called admin with considerable influence as well as enable *some* of the
>> audit features in Solaris. One has to be careful with that however as you
>> can fill a disk with audit logs
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> At what rev of Solaris does this work ? Solaris 10 GA ? Or is this a
Yep; it relies on process privs, which were introduced with
Solaris 10.
> feature that will work in Solaris 9 also ? We know that Solaris 8 is out
Nope.
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SC
Bonnie Corwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am happy to announce the first porting results for SCCS:
> >
> > SCCS now compiles and runs on SunOS 4, SunOS 5 and Linux.
> >
> > The source is available at:
> > ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/sccs/
> >
> > In order to make it run on Linux, several
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Hi Dennis
0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ # uname -a
SunOS topgun 5.11 snv_43 i86pc i386 i86pc
Made the entry into /etc/user_attr
mritundefaultpriv=basic,!proc_info
Before:
0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~# ps -ef | wc -l
84
After (logout then again login)
0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~# ps
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Menno Lageman wrote:
Dennis Clarke wrote:
I personally have always wondered why the ps command display what
root is
doing to ordinary users like as if it is any of their business but that
is another idea I just let rattle around in my head.
Dennis,
You can do this (in
On Sun, 14 Jan 2007, David Lloyd wrote:
I'm not so sure we've got the culprit here. I'd blame X...they're
just as painful in Linux and FreeBSD.
Uhm, XRandR? One big limitation is that the modelist isn't dynamic -
that's being worked on by the XOrg people (google for XRandR 1.2).
regards,
--
Peter Bray writes:
> Proposal: The Enterprise-Quality Small Server/Appliance Computer
It might be worthwhile to take this to the existing Open Solaris
Appliances community:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/appliances/
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>And the less you can do as a normal user, the more people will be
>tempted to run as root all the time. Life (and hence security) is full
>of these little tradeoffs.
Not if you can't. (I.e., this is a fine configuration for systems where
there are many non-root users; not so in the case were
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The reason why Windows is so easy to install is only because it
> comes pre-installed.
And the MS-WIN GUI is only "easy to use" for the people who spend a long
time to learn it's oddness.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[
Josip Gracin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
> > But let's face it .. it isn't. UNIX and Linux are not for the masses
> > and no amount of snazzy graphics or a tetris game in the installer will make
> > it easy.
>
> You've deliberately left out Mac OS X, right? Because that se
> Menno Lageman wrote:
>> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>>>
>>> I personally have always wondered why the ps command display what
>>> root is
>>> doing to ordinary users like as if it is any of their business but that
>>> is another idea I just let rattle around in my head.
>>>
>>
>> Dennis,
>>
>> You c
Menno Lageman wrote:
Dennis Clarke wrote:
I personally have always wondered why the ps command display what
root is
doing to ordinary users like as if it is any of their business but that
is another idea I just let rattle around in my head.
Dennis,
You can do this (in Solaris 10 and up
It's timing out. Seems like it's overloaded or something because if
it doesn't time out, it'll return incomplete pages after a while, or
empty search results for quite valid things.
/dale
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@o
Any news on when b55 will be ready?
Thanks
Andrew.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Hi Dennis
>
> 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ # uname -a
> SunOS topgun 5.11 snv_43 i86pc i386 i86pc
>
>
> Made the entry into /etc/user_attr
>
> mritundefaultpriv=basic,!proc_info
>
> Before:
>
> 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~# ps -ef | wc -l
> 84
>
> After (logout then again login)
>
> 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> But let's face it .. it isn't. UNIX and Linux are not for the masses
>>and no amount of snazzy graphics or a tetris game in the installer will
>> make
>>it easy. I just have a minimal expectation that the current feature set
>> are
>>reflected in some way in the installer. Like ZFS as an o
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> But let's face it .. it isn't. UNIX and Linux are not for the masses
>> and no amount of snazzy graphics or a tetris game in the installer will
>> make
>> it easy.
>
> You've deliberately left out Mac OS X, right? Because that seems to be
> a Unix which hides the compl
"Dennis Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Like why isn't ifconfig the same command in Linux, UNIX and Windows ? Why
> does Windows use ipconfig ? Because Bill wanted the command to be different
> I guess. Not sure.
MS-WIN "ipconfig" is closer to the UNIX ifconfig than the Linux ifconfig is ;
Hi Dennis
0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ # uname -a
SunOS topgun 5.11 snv_43 i86pc i386 i86pc
Made the entry into /etc/user_attr
mritundefaultpriv=basic,!proc_info
Before:
0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~# ps -ef | wc -l
84
After (logout then again login)
0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~# ps -ef | wc -l
4
It wor
> But let's face it .. it isn't. UNIX and Linux are not for the masses
>and no amount of snazzy graphics or a tetris game in the installer will make
>it easy. I just have a minimal expectation that the current feature set are
>reflected in some way in the installer. Like ZFS as an option for
>f
Hi,
> 3. does anyone know if solaris will work with the
> mcp51 nvidia chipset and video card?
> ... (I have an hp pavilion dv2000 series
> laptop)
I don't know for the dv2000 but I have installed SXCR b54 on two HP dv6000
(Turion64 X2) which have an MCP51 NVIDIA chipset. There is a problem wit
Dennis Clarke wrote:
But let's face it .. it isn't. UNIX and Linux are not for the masses
and no amount of snazzy graphics or a tetris game in the installer will make
it easy.
You've deliberately left out Mac OS X, right? Because that seems to be
a Unix which hides the complexity pretty wel
>
> The ideas presented within are not revolutionary but
> I hope they represent an evolutionary next stage for
> smaller server/appliance systems. I've attached the
> proposal, as it about two pages long, hopefully this
> will also avoid unnecessary quoting in the
> responses.
>
> Looking forwar
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>>
>> I personally have always wondered why the ps command display what root is
>> doing to ordinary users like as if it is any of their business but that
>> is another idea I just let rattle around in my head.
>>
>
> Dennis,
>
> You can do this (in Solaris 10 and up) by
Dennis Clarke wrote:
I personally have always wondered why the ps command display what root is
doing to ordinary users like as if it is any of their business but that
is another idea I just let rattle around in my head.
Dennis,
You can do this (in Solaris 10 and up) by taking away the pro
48 matches
Mail list logo
