Does it happen to all flash movies or some of them?
Do you have any problem with the audio driver?
Does it happen with snv_111?
Thanks,
Ginn
On Aug 19, 2009, at 9:58 PM, Rob McMahon wrote:
Has anyone seen this ? On my Toshiba laptop (Satellite Pro P300),
graphics card:
pci bus 0x0001 cardnu
That's good to know, has anyone delved into importing packages from
subversion for IPS/pkgtools?
2009/8/20 Che Kristo
> As I have said before the effort spent supporting two packaging systems
> would be better spent on porting packages into the existing system (IPS), if
> someone wants to go and
Alan Steinberg wrote:
Wait a second. Is it an SXCE image or an OpenSolaris image? If it is
SXCE, then you can do a net install.
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-2394?l=en&q=add_install_server
Yes, I was confused by the 'AI image' part :)
--
Shawn Walker
__
As I have said before the effort spent supporting two packaging systems
would be better spent on porting packages into the existing system (IPS), if
someone wants to go and work on other package systems (and they have) they
are ,more than welcome to.
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 4:48 AM, Spencer Tom Ta
It's SXCE dvd iso image. Not OSOL.
That looks like it, I can mount the image lofs and start configuring the
install server.
thanks,
On 08/19/09 15:48, Alan Steinberg wrote:
Wait a second. Is it an SXCE image or an OpenSolaris image? If it is
SXCE, then you can do a net install.
http://do
* Joerg Schilling (joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de) wrote:
> Glenn Lagasse wrote:
>
> > > The way you proprose to do things does not work as it has been
> > > verified that it is close to impossible to collaborate with Sun as
> > > long as proposals for intergating fixes are just ignored.
> >
Vikash Tulsiyan wrote:
I am writing a script that allows any user(with appropriate
permissions) to install packages and start/stop some services on
opensolaris. As far as i know only Primary Administrator has the
priviledge to perform these task. Is my understanding correct or any
other role all
Glenn Lagasse wrote:
> > The way you proprose to do things does not work as it has been
> > verified that it is close to impossible to collaborate with Sun as
> > long as proposals for intergating fixes are just ignored.
>
> You're joking right? I see requests for sponsorship come in and get
I
* Joerg Schilling (joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de) wrote:
> Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>
> > done. (And since you didn't provide a list of the bug reports you're
> > referring
> > to, we can't even discuss when those might be fixed.)I look forward to
> > seeing your mail to request-spons
Wait a second. Is it an SXCE image or an OpenSolaris image? If it is
SXCE, then you can do a net install.
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-2394?l=en&q=add_install_server
- Alan
Shawn Walker wrote:
Wing Choi wrote:
Hello,
I've d/l the SXCE dvd iso from opensolaris.
Obviously it's a boot
Wing Choi wrote:
Hello,
I've d/l the SXCE dvd iso from opensolaris.
Obviously it's a bootable dvd iso image.
Is there a way to do an AI image or boot net install it
without burning the image onto a DVD and physically
boot install it on my machine?
Not at this time.
--
Shawn Walker
_
Uros Nedic wrote:
Thanks for answering. But you answered only on one part of
my question.
Second part is what will happen with closed binaries? Will
they be opened, exchanged with community developed open
source equivalents or something else?
It is likely that most of the closed binaries are c
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Well, 4 years ago, I posted a list of problems (mostly missing files) that
> prevented to compile OpenSolaris on OpenSoaris. Nobody did ever try to
> cooperate in order work on this list. Nobody did ever report that this list
> was completely outdated and compiling OpenSo
Joerg Schilling wrote:
The fact that Indiana introduced a "primary adminstrator" role introduced a
security bug. 10 months ago, I became aware that Sun did introduce an even
bigger security problem while trying to hide (but not to fix) the problem.
I did send a seecurity alert 10 months ago, but
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 22:50 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Pandor Painter and Decorator wrote:
>
> > One question about quality of CD. cdrecord gaves very suspected (my
> > opinion) information about TDK cd, which is most expensive in the shop
> > (25 ??? per 100).
> >
> > ATIP info from disk:
>
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> done. (And since you didn't provide a list of the bug reports you're
> referring
> to, we can't even discuss when those might be fixed.)I look forward to
> seeing your mail to request-sponsor with your contributions of fixes for these
> bugs. Personally, my cont
Thanks for answering. But you answered only on one part of
my question.
Second part is what will happen with closed binaries? Will
they be opened, exchanged with community developed open
source equivalents or something else?
Uros
> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009
Cyril Plisko wrote:
> > "No, you need to transition to working with IPS. There are internal
> > presentations on this, but they emphasize that we're not treating
> > internal & external developers differently here - we're stopping the
> > old-WOS production/release for everyone at the same time
atul kulkarni wrote:
>> From what I can see, it's not Opensolaris. It's
>> SXCE. What I dont
>> nderstand is how you get two different release
>> numbers "67" and "89".
>> Did you type it manually and make a typo?
> I copied it from the terminal and pasted it here.
>> There is no IPS or "pkg"
atul kulkarni wrote:
* atul kulkarni (a...@mailinator.com) wrote:
Here is what's on my /etc/release
Solaris Nevada snv_67 X86
Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use is subject to license
terms.
Assembled 18 June 2007
.j
atul kulkarni wrote:
From what I can see, it's not Opensolaris. It's
SXCE. What I dont
nderstand is how you get two different release
numbers "67" and "89".
Did you type it manually and make a typo?
I copied it from the terminal and pasted it here.
There is no IPS or "pkg" binary. There
> * atul kulkarni (a...@mailinator.com) wrote:
> > Here is what's on my /etc/release
> > Solaris Nevada snv_67 X86
> >Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems, Inc.
> All Rights Reserved.
> Use is subject to license
> terms.
> Assembled 18 June 2007
> .jo
> From what I can see, it's not Opensolaris. It's
> SXCE. What I dont
> nderstand is how you get two different release
> numbers "67" and "89".
> Did you type it manually and make a typo?
I copied it from the terminal and pasted it here.
> There is no IPS or "pkg" binary. There is no way to
Hello,
I've d/l the SXCE dvd iso from opensolaris.
Obviously it's a bootable dvd iso image.
Is there a way to do an AI image or boot net install it
without burning the image onto a DVD and physically
boot install it on my machine?
Thanks,
Wing
___
o
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>
>> Joerg Schilling wrote:
>>> Glenn Lagasse wrote:
>>>
Yes, at some point. Right now today however that's not the case, at
least we don't know if it's the case. But, since SXCE is going away all
consolidations will have to build
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:35 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
> Considering Alan Coopersmith explicitly stated that:
>
> "No, you need to transition to working with IPS. There are internal
> presentations on this, but they emphasize that we're not treating
> internal & external developers differently her
Cyril Plisko wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Paul Gress wrote:
Cyril Plisko wrote:
Hi !
There are mentions from time to time of a big file server in Sun that
powers home dirs and a lot of other stuff. They say jurassic is the
name.
Rumors talk about this server being upgraded biweekly
Paul Gress wrote:
Cyril Plisko wrote:
Hi !
There are mentions from time to time of a big file server in Sun that
powers home dirs and a lot of other stuff. They say jurassic is the
name.
Rumors talk about this server being upgraded biweekly to the latest
Nevada build.
If that is true, it would
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Paul Gress wrote:
The difference is, SXCE will not be available to the public, but will
still be available internally.
Nope - we're stopping building it at the same time for everyone.
Thanks, I stand corrected.
Paul
___
Paul Gress wrote:
> The difference is, SXCE will not be available to the public, but will
> still be available internally.
Nope - we're stopping building it at the same time for everyone.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@sun.com
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Paul Gress wrote:
> Cyril Plisko wrote:
>>
>> Hi !
>>
>> There are mentions from time to time of a big file server in Sun that
>> powers home dirs and a lot of other stuff. They say jurassic is the
>> name.
>> Rumors talk about this server being upgraded biweekly t
Cyril Plisko wrote:
Hi !
There are mentions from time to time of a big file server in Sun that
powers home dirs and a lot of other stuff. They say jurassic is the
name.
Rumors talk about this server being upgraded biweekly to the latest
Nevada build.
If that is true, it would be interesting to
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Glenn Lagasse wrote:
> >
> >> Yes, at some point. Right now today however that's not the case, at
> >> least we don't know if it's the case. But, since SXCE is going away all
> >> consolidations will have to build on OpenSolaris. It's just
Hi,
I guess this is the possible migration plan:
- install IPS on SXCE
- create ZFS dataset for new BE
- create image on mounted filesystem
- update uuid, boot-archive, SMF and such
- create new grub entry and reboot into OS BE
> Hi !
>
> There are mentions from time to time of a big file
> ser
Pandor Painter and Decorator wrote:
> One question about quality of CD. cdrecord gaves very suspected (my
> opinion) information about TDK cd, which is most expensive in the shop
> (25 ??? per 100).
>
> ATIP info from disk:
> Indicated writing power: 5
> Is not unrestricted
> Is not erasabl
Here are some of the messages:
Aug 19 10:55:18 opensolaris /sbin/dhcpagent[130]: [ID 716041 daemon.warning]
accept_v4_acknak: NAK on interface e1000g0
Aug 19 10:55:22 opensolaris last message repeated 1 time
Aug 19 10:55:22 opensolaris /sbin/dhcpagent[130]: [ID 947604 daemon.warning]
checkaddr: ex
Hi !
There are mentions from time to time of a big file server in Sun that
powers home dirs and a lot of other stuff. They say jurassic is the
name.
Rumors talk about this server being upgraded biweekly to the latest
Nevada build.
If that is true, it would be interesting to hear what the plans ar
atul kulkarni wrote:
Here is what's on my /etc/release
Solaris Nevada snv_67 X86
Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Use is subject to license terms.
Assembled 18 June 2007
My uname -a is
SunOS X.
Hi!
One question about quality of CD. cdrecord gaves very suspected (my
opinion) information about TDK cd, which is most expensive in the shop
(25 € per 100).
ATIP info from disk:
Indicated writing power: 5
Is not unrestricted
Is not erasable
Disk sub type: Medium Type B, low Beta categor
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Glenn Lagasse wrote:
>
>> Yes, at some point. Right now today however that's not the case, at
>> least we don't know if it's the case. But, since SXCE is going away all
>> consolidations will have to build on OpenSolaris. It's just a matter of
>> consolidations testing
* atul kulkarni (a...@mailinator.com) wrote:
> Here is what's on my /etc/release
> Solaris Nevada snv_67 X86
>Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> Use is subject to license terms.
> Assembled 18 June
Seems like I have SXCE (code named nevada) instead of actual Opensolaris.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
atul kulkarni wrote:
Here is what's on my /etc/release
Solaris Nevada snv_67 X86
Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Use is subject to license terms.
Assembled 18 June 2007
My uname -a is
SunOS X.
Here is what's on my /etc/release
Solaris Nevada snv_67 X86
Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Use is subject to license terms.
Assembled 18 June 2007
My uname -a is
SunOS X.joyent.us 5.11 snv_89 i
* atul kulkarni (a...@mailinator.com) wrote:
> I am new to Opensolaris (only a couple of days). I have a command line
> sudo access to an Opensolaris box. During reading few docs I learnt it
> has a package manager IPS which can be used from the command line
> using 'pkg' command. But its missing f
Here are some of the messages:
Aug 19 10:55:18 opensolaris /sbin/dhcpagent[130]: [ID 716041 daemon.warning]
accept_v4_acknak: NAK on interface e1000g0
Aug 19 10:55:22 opensolaris last message repeated 1 time
Aug 19 10:55:22 opensolaris /sbin/dhcpagent[130]: [ID 947604 daemon.warning]
checkaddr:
Shawn Walker wrote:
Ian Collins wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
The popularity of the OpenSolaris 200x releases vs. that of the
Solaris Express releases in terms of usage speaks for itself IMO.
Do you have the numbers?
If you read past postings here and there on indiana-iscuss or
opensolaris-d
Hi there,
I am trying to run OpenSolaris build 118 (Guest) under VirtualBox
3.0.4 on Host Ubuntu 9.04 x64.
I have tried both booting the build 118 live dvd preview available
from Genunix and booting an existing OpenSolaris 2009.06 which I have
upgraded to build 118 from the dev pkg repository. Bo
does anything appear on /var/adm/messages at the time the interface goes
down?
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 3:25 PM, vhiz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is for a fresh install of opensolaris 2008.11.. Here is what
> is happening:
>
> After I issue the command, 'ifconfig e1000g0 auto-dhcp', the inter
Glenn Lagasse wrote:
> Yes, at some point. Right now today however that's not the case, at
> least we don't know if it's the case. But, since SXCE is going away all
> consolidations will have to build on OpenSolaris. It's just a matter of
> consolidations testing their builds and filing bugs f
More choice is relevant when you have a limited application base, to
make the most of what's out there would mean using subversion and
OpenPKG for best effect. One would expect to get more packages on a
running system provided that you can install it from the disc since
both have their own applicat
atul kulkarni wrote:
I am new to Opensolaris (only a couple of days). I have a command line sudo
access to an Opensolaris box. During reading few docs I learnt it has a package
manager IPS which can be used from the command line using 'pkg' command. But
its missing from my system. I tried find
Chidi:
Sounds like an Xserver driver issue, and not a GDM issue. Hopefully
someone with more knowledge about the Xserver can help.
Brian
Alan/ Brian,
Thanks for responding:
I executd /usr/X11/bin/Xserver frome command line and here is the
error message I got:
(EE) Unable to locate/optn c
Mike DeMarco wrote:
I believe Oct is the right time for this! "Middle of Hurricane season. This is
looking like a monumental disaster!
I am too am running SXCE and nervous about changing to Opensolaris. I
knew it would happen someday. No matter what day, week, month or year
for changing,
Hi,
This is for a fresh install of opensolaris 2008.11.. Here is what is
happening:
After I issue the command, 'ifconfig e1000g0 auto-dhcp', the interface is
connected, and after a few seconds it disconnects, saying that dhcp is down.
Other systems connected to the same switch are w
I am new to Opensolaris (only a couple of days). I have a command line sudo
access to an Opensolaris box. During reading few docs I learnt it has a package
manager IPS which can be used from the command line using 'pkg' command. But
its missing from my system. I tried finding packages to install
It has to be, since that's what we're going to be doing to build the
images we release for builds 128 and later. Not all consolidations
are fully ready yet, but we're all supposed to be working on it.
For X, there's one known bug around the SGML catalog files needed to
build our documentation, b
Alan/ Brian,
Thanks for responding:
I executd /usr/X11/bin/Xserver frome command line and here is the error
message I got:
(EE) Unable to locate/optn config file
(==) Using default built-in configuration (39 Lines)
(EE) GARTInit: Unable to open /dev/agpgart (Resource temporarily
unavailable)
Jonathan Edwards wrote:
> - refresh_fmri, restart_fmri .. seems to only affect existing FMRIs -
> how about packages that install an FMRI and want to import it?
Tag your service manifest with
restart_fmri=svc:/system/manifest-import:default
If it needs to be enabled from the get-go, the man
* Uros Nedic (ur...@live.com) wrote:
>
> I know for ON consolidation. My question is regarding
> building all consolidations and assembling this into
> OpenSolaris build. Will it be possible?
Yes, at some point. Right now today however that's not the case, at
least we don't know if it's the case
On Aug 19, 2009, at 1:24 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
Jonathan Edwards wrote:
(2) Decent pre/post-install methodologies:
I do understand the desire to containerize this sort of thing
within SMF, but i do not believe that there is a current mechanism
defined to start/stop SMF services around a p
I know for ON consolidation. My question is regarding
building all consolidations and assembling this into
OpenSolaris build. Will it be possible?
Uros
> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:59:50 -0700
> From: glenn.laga...@sun.com
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] ON/
Jonathan Edwards wrote:
(2) Decent pre/post-install methodologies:
I do understand the desire to containerize this sort of thing within
SMF, but i do not believe that there is a current mechanism defined to
start/stop SMF services around a package installation .. also somewhat
problematic for
Jonathan Edwards wrote:
> (1) Slowness .. (don't get me wrong - it's gotten better) .. [pkg defects
> 1949, 5225, 10706]
(All search performance bugs.) 1949 is fixed. As for slower than other
packaging systems, yes, we do want to get this faster, but, we may never
get it to the speed of SVr4, m
casper@sun.com wrote:
Ghee Teo wrote:
So what is your 'supports' for doing the things the ways you are doing
that are supposed to be helpful to Solaris users to migrate/upgrade to
OpenSolaris. Have you considered also the hundreds of ISV for Solaris
will now to adapt to the new paradigm?
I
Ian Collins wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
The popularity of the OpenSolaris 200x releases vs. that of the
Solaris Express releases in terms of usage speaks for itself IMO.
Do you have the numbers?
If you read past postings here and there on indiana-iscuss or
opensolaris-discuss, the usage ind
Ghee Teo wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
Ghee Teo wrote:
So what is your 'supports' for doing the things the ways you are
doing that are supposed to be helpful to Solaris users to
migrate/upgrade to OpenSolaris. Have you considered also the hundreds
of ISV for Solaris will now to adapt to the new
* Uros Nedic (ur...@live.com) wrote:
>
> I would like to ask if bi-weekly OpenSolaris builds will contain
> all tools (including closed binaries) necessary to do 'home made'
> OpenSolaris build from the source code?
You can already build OS/NET on OpenSolaris today. You need to add the
extra rep
Hi Vano,
* Vano Beridze (vano.beri...@silkroad.ge) wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have one 80gb hdd and 2 identical 320 hdd-s. All of them are sata drives.
> I'm going to install OpenSolaris 2009.06 on 80gb HDD and create
> mirrored pool using 2 320 hdd drives to store my data.
>
> I have the following qu
On Aug 19, 2009, at 12:01 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
i understand that the SXCE binary downloads are going away .. (just
wondering if I need to transition to a private build system until
some
of the IPS smoke clears)
No, you need to transition to working with IPS. There are internal
pre
I would like to ask if bi-weekly OpenSolaris builds will contain
all tools (including closed binaries) necessary to do 'home made'
OpenSolaris build from the source code?
If you opened some closed binaries because you bought license for
that or community developed open source version, will that o
Jonathan Edwards wrote:
>
> On Aug 11, 2009, at 6:08 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>
>> Erast wrote:
>>> Guys, could someone confirm that this schedule is STILL valid?
>>>
>>> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/on/schedule/
>>>
>>> I'm just wondering that because of SXCE drop - what will happe
On Aug 11, 2009, at 6:08 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Erast wrote:
Guys, could someone confirm that this schedule is STILL valid?
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/on/schedule/
I'm just wondering that because of SXCE drop - what will happen with
bi-weekly schedule and releases?
The on
Is there a utility in SOLARIS similar to 'setkeycodes' in LINUX?
I have an LK461-A2 keyboard with the following keys:
Key Extended Scan Code
F13 E03D
F14 E03E
HELP E03F
DOE040
F17 E041
It appears that the extended scan codes are not being recognized by SOLARIS? Is
there a utility t
Hello
I have one 80gb hdd and 2 identical 320 hdd-s. All of them are sata drives.
I'm going to install OpenSolaris 2009.06 on 80gb HDD and create mirrored
pool using 2 320 hdd drives to store my data.
I have the following questions:
1. Is it good drive layout? Can I have mirrored root pool us
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 2:46 AM, wrote:
>
>>Ghee Teo wrote:
>>> So what is your 'supports' for doing the things the ways you are doing
>>> that are supposed to be helpful to Solaris users to migrate/upgrade to
>>> OpenSolaris. Have you considered also the hundreds of ISV for Solaris
>>> will now t
Has anyone seen this ? On my Toshiba laptop (Satellite Pro P300),
graphics card:
pci bus 0x0001 cardnum 0x00 function 0x00: vendor 0x1002 device 0x95c4
ATI Technologies Inc Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Series
release:
OpenSolaris Development snv_118 X86
firefox 3.5
flash:
FMRI:
pkg://extra/web/
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
[...]
> The popularity of the OpenSolaris 200x releases vs.
> that of the Solaris Express releases in terms of usage speaks for itself
> IMO.
Considering that the only mention I've ever heard of Solaris Express
has been on the OpenSolaris lis
Shawn Walker wrote:
Ghee Teo wrote:
So what is your 'supports' for doing the things the ways you are
doing that are supposed to be helpful to Solaris users to
migrate/upgrade to OpenSolaris. Have you considered also the hundreds
of ISV for Solaris will now to adapt to the new paradigm?
I can
I believe Oct is the right time for this! "Middle of Hurricane season. This is
looking like a monumental disaster!
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
It would be really nice of we could have these figures for OpenSolaris
released to the community...can someone inside push to get these figures
published?
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 8:19 PM, wrote:
>
> >Shawn Walker wrote:
> >> The popularity of the OpenSolaris 200x releases vs. that of the
> >> So
>Shawn Walker wrote:
>> The popularity of the OpenSolaris 200x releases vs. that of the
>> Solaris Express releases in terms of usage speaks for itself IMO.
>>
>Do you have the numbers?
>
I certainly would want to know those, also because of the number of
the SPARC vs the x86 downloads now that
casper@sun.com wrote:
That's not entirely true; quite a few people argued for "scripting at
install" and they were denied as there was clearly not a discussion
but more of a "this is the plan and we're not changing it".
These people have unsubscribed because they felt there was no actual
di
Shawn Walker wrote:
The popularity of the OpenSolaris 200x releases vs. that of the
Solaris Express releases in terms of usage speaks for itself IMO.
Do you have the numbers?
--
Ian.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensola
Being an absolute newb, I had to look up how this was done. The answer I got
was this:
$ mount -F pcfs /dev/dsk/c5d0p4 /mnt/dosdisk
- http://blogs.sun.com/observatory/entry/mounting_fat_32_partitions_in
It works fine, however some (not all) of the directories appear in
all-capitlised letters.
>Ghee Teo wrote:
>> So what is your 'supports' for doing the things the ways you are doing
>> that are supposed to be helpful to Solaris users to migrate/upgrade to
>> OpenSolaris. Have you considered also the hundreds of ISV for Solaris
>> will now to adapt to the new paradigm?
>
>I can't answ
86 matches
Mail list logo
