I have a solution for Herr Martin Bochnig that I think will make everyone in
the OpenSolaris community happy:
There are many people like me who have old Pentium III and Pentium IV computers
with only 500 megabytes of RAM and we can't run Project Indiana OpenSolaris
2008.05 on these computers
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 4:23 AM, Anon Y Mous [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a solution for Herr Martin Bochnig that I think will make everyone in
the OpenSolaris community happy:
There are many people like me who have old Pentium III and Pentium IV
computers with only 500 megabytes of RAM
Genunix says that Martux works on Sun4u. I think I have an old Sun Blade 100
with 500 megabytes of RAM buried in my girlfriend's garage somewhere. I will
have to go on an archeological dig and excavate it so I can give Martux a spin
on it.
There is definitely a need a small, compact
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 5:03 AM, Anon Y Mous [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Genunix says that Martux works on Sun4u. I think I have an old Sun Blade 100
with 500 megabytes of RAM buried in my girlfriend's garage somewhere. I will
have to go on an archeological dig and excavate it so I can give
I would submit that in the desktop realm, you would be correct.
However, in my experience in the server realm, custom builds are
pretty common. For example, until very recently (like the last 2
years), I've rarely seen anyone run the Sun provided BIND, Sendmail or
Apache daemons on production
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:16:03 +0200
Martin Bochnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Martin Bochnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would venture to guess that a significant majority of users will
the error message should have read use crle, linux-man
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Martin Bochnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The error msg came, because options need to go last into the cmd line:
# LD_PRELOAD=/tmp/y/a.out conary update tuxpaint --resolve
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 23:16:41 +0100
Calum Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19 Oct 2008, at 13:11, Duncan Paterson wrote:
What are the chances that this will one day rival apt for selection,
frequency of updates and speed.
It will happen a lot quicker once we have repositories in
I'd much rather see a ports type implementation than an rpm
implementation - particularly if it includes the sources.
fpsm
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Mike Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 23:16:41 +0100
Calum Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19 Oct 2008, at 13:11,
The most likely implementation will probably be what the pkgbuild folks
are providing, which is very much like rpmbuild.
Fredrich Maney wrote:
I'd much rather see a ports type implementation than an rpm
implementation - particularly if it includes the sources.
fpsm
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008
I'd much rather see a ports type implementation than
an rpm
implementation - particularly if it includes the
sources.
fpsm
Sources available? Darn right - some of the licenses require that, too.
Build from source as the normal method of installation? That, I think is
too slow for most
Mike Meyer wrote:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:49:36 PDT Richard L. Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'd much rather see a ports type implementation than
an rpm
implementation - particularly if it includes the
sources.
Sources available? Darn right - some of the licenses require that, too.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would venture to guess that a significant majority of users will never
need to or want to recompile or alter the software as you suggest.
They're going to want a stable, tested version of the software, and that
means a
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Martin Bochnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would venture to guess that a significant majority of users will never
need to or want to recompile or alter the software as you suggest.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:25 AM, Mike Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:16:03 +0200
Martin Bochnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Martin Bochnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# LD_PRELOAD=/tmp/y/a.out conary update --resove tuxpaint
usage: conary update [+][-]pkgname[=version][[flavor]]* changeset*
Update or install software on the system
options:
Update Options:
--exact-flavors Only match troves whose flavors match exactly
--from-file=FROM-FILE
The error msg came, because options need to go last into the cmd line:
# LD_PRELOAD=/tmp/y/a.out conary update tuxpaint --resolve
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 20 Oct 2008, at 23:40, Martin Bochnig wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Calum Benson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19 Oct 2008, at 13:11, Duncan Paterson wrote:
What are the chances that this will one day rival apt for selection,
frequency of updates and speed.
It will happen
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Calum Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20 Oct 2008, at 23:40, Martin Bochnig wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Calum Benson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19 Oct 2008, at 13:11, Duncan Paterson wrote:
What are the chances that this will one
Martin Bochnig wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Calum Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20 Oct 2008, at 23:40, Martin Bochnig wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Calum Benson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Dave Miner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Bochnig wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Calum Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20 Oct 2008, at 23:40, Martin Bochnig wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Calum
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Dave Miner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Bochnig wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Calum Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20 Oct 2008, at 23:40, Martin Bochnig wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Calum
Martin Bochnig wrote:
...
Seriously, persecution complex much?
-mg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Mario Goebbels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Bochnig wrote:
...
Seriously, persecution complex much?
-mg
No, for what?
I'm not rPath.
Doesn't make sense what you say. I only analyze the facts.
But if you don't know (or understand) them, better stop
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Mario Goebbels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Bochnig wrote:
...
Seriously, persecution complex much?
For what it is worth, Martin is not alone with the concern, especially given
how similar the projects are becoming. While I may not agree with the
Seriously, persecution complex much?
No, for what?
I'm not rPath.
Doesn't make sense what you say. I only analyze the facts.
But if you don't know (or understand) them, better stop this rant.
Doesn't change the fact that you're being frickin' annoying since your
episode with Sun
Martin Bochnig wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Dave Miner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Bochnig wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Calum Benson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Mario Goebbels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seriously, persecution complex much?
No, for what?
I'm not rPath.
Doesn't make sense what you say. I only analyze the facts.
But if you don't know (or understand) them, better stop this rant.
Doesn't change
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:28 PM, Dave Miner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Bochnig wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Dave Miner [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Bochnig wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Calum Benson
[EMAIL
Because you are lacking (or at least running out of) arguments, you try to
fight me via the personal psycho style method.
Here's the persecution complex again... Fight you personal psycho
style.
Only thing I'm discussing here is that your discussion style sucks, not
the arguments you bring
Martin Bochnig wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:28 PM, Dave Miner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Bochnig wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Dave Miner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:11 PM, Mario Goebbels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because you are lacking (or at least running out of) arguments, you try to
fight me via the personal psycho style method.
Here's the persecution complex again... Fight you personal psycho style.
Only thing I'm
Can we please just end this discussion? Both sides have raised
interesting points, both sides have merits within those points, and I
think it's fine for both projects to continue development.
The open source world is ripe with projects that fork to create
derivative works[1], and a
ok brilliant thanks so much for your help I'll get on it when I get back from
uni later on.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
The docs are all at:
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/docs/content/IPS/ipsdev.html#createipspkg
Tim Cramer mentioned during one of the community conference calls that it was a
goal to have external contribution mechanisms set up for 2008.11...for the
interim period other IPS repositories are blastwave
On 19 Oct 2008, at 13:11, Duncan Paterson wrote:
What are the chances that this will one day rival apt for selection,
frequency of updates and speed.
It will happen a lot quicker once we have repositories in place to
which everyone can contribute packages. I get the feeling that'll be
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Calum Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19 Oct 2008, at 13:11, Duncan Paterson wrote:
What are the chances that this will one day rival apt for selection,
frequency of updates and speed.
It will happen a lot quicker once we have repositories in place to
What are the chances that this will one day rival apt for selection, frequency
of updates and speed. I really love opensolaris, but find that I'm compiling a
lot of my own packages from source which defeats the purpose a little. However
I have to say other than the package manager this is the
If you are seeing speed issues where you think there shouldn't be you can
always file a bug. Since the initial release of 2008.05 i've noticed
significant improvements in IPS and the package manager GUI.
If you are going to the effort of compiling all of your software why not make
the extra
thanks for your input :) sound like I'm backing the right team I'll go and
learn about making these packages. Thanks very much.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
40 matches
Mail list logo
