Hi guys...
I am currently considering an offer to spend two months working in
sunny Bognor Regis on the southern coast of England. According to my
atlas its only a couple of hours away from London, so I can see the
possibility of a few weekend trips.
So if anyone over that way is
I'm looking for a TTL flash to use with my Super Program and my MZ5.
Boz's KMP seems to be saying that the FTZ flashes won't work at all with my
Super Program? Is this true? Or will I simply loose the digital functions?
Would an AF280T be a better choice to work with both cameras?
Basically TTL
Hi,
Oliver Raymond wrote:
I have IDENTICAL instructions. 17 days to go, and I can't see any way around
it.. I can't even get away with a Leica (borrowed)... :) I might just appear
with a Sinar P2, just to wind her up... on second thoughts, maybe not!
It's a worldwide conspiracy. I am also
Hi,
Allen Murray wrote:
Do you own an A-1? If so how are the above water pictures?
Not Chris, but I have owned one of these and used two others. I
was terribly disappointed with the quality of output. Having
used a Sureshot Supreme (fixed fl, autofocus) which produced
excellent results, I
Da: David A. Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Data: 20/03/2002 09:38
A: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oggetto: UK PDMLers
Hi guys...
I am currently considering an offer to spend two months working in
sunny Bognor Regis on the southern coast of England. ...
Hey David,
as long as you're here in Europe
Hi,
Debra Wilborn wrote:
There seems to be a whole other world out there with
regards to lenses.
There sure is. A lot of it is exceelent stuff, too. The only
thing to watch out for is quality control. Sample variance
seems to be much higher than you would expect, so check your
Hi,
David A. Mann wrote:
Hi guys...
I am currently considering an offer to spend two months working in
sunny Bognor Regis on the southern coast of England. According to my
atlas its only a couple of hours away from London, so I can see the
possibility of a few weekend trips.
Hello all!
This lens is about to show up in a local camera shop (the
previous owner said he will bring it soon). I don't know it's
condition yet but the price is going to be about USD 130.
How do you judge this lens? I would like to use it mainly for
portraits and some body shots from time to
Aluminum can be chrome plated, but it would be a costly and inefficient method. I
think the chrome reference is
more in regard to color rather than coating method. I would guess that both are
anodized. Anodizing can be
colorless and is sometimes used just to harden things. Crankshaft journals,
There are all kinds of alloys of aluminum, some are extremely strong. The
engine mounts in fuel dragsters, which must resist the twisting force of a 6000
horsepower engine are made of T-6 aluminum alloy.
Paul
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh I hope it's not aluminum. It's light, but has no
If you took a spotmeter reading off of her face and she is a caucasian of
moderate complexion, give her one stop more exposure than what the meter read.
Your grey card reading in the same plane as her face should indicate more
exposure unless her skin is quite dark. Depending on the film, I would
The chrome finish, though, is incredibly durable and making
scratches on a chrome Limited lens really take an effort.
Please Pål, tell us you haven't actually tried this!
William Robb
No. But I had both the 77 Limited and the FA* 200/4 Macro accidentally in
the same compartment of the
BTW It might be that black Limited lenses will fetch a higher price on the
used market as they are pretty rare. This may change, though, if Pentax
start marketing black Limiteds internationally.
Pål
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
On Tuesday, March 19, 2002, at 08:54 PM, David Chang-Sang wrote:
P.S. Aaron, apparently you're going to give me ALL I need to have to be
able to develop my own film at home !! :)
Yeah, for a price. ;)
Come to the store, I'll rip you off--er, I mean, set you up--er, I mean,
uh, sell you
In a message dated 20/03/02 07:46:09 GMT Standard Time, Tom writes:
The black 77mm
Ltd that I saw was a little more matte than glossy.
You've seen one in the flesh? Alex Grigolia showed me an ad for a black 31mm
in the Pentax Family mag, and it looked pretty glossy.
They appear satin
There is a company called ikelite that makes underwater housings. You
could contact them and find out if they made a housing for the super
program and get the model number from them and then check with camera
and dive shops or wait for one to come up on ebay. The older housing
seem to be hard
There are all kinds of alloys of aluminum, some are extremely strong. The
engine mounts in fuel dragsters, which must resist the twisting force of a
6000
horsepower engine are made of T-6 aluminum alloy.
Wonder if the Pentax T6 converter was made of the same material. :)
regards,
Alan Chan
I think my server was screwing up, because some of them seemed to pop up
several hours after I sent them. Also, some e-mails that I sent to other
receipients were late in arriving (if they arrived at all).
I don't think you missed much anyway... ;-)
-frank
wendy beard wrote:
I just got to
Gentlemen, and Ladies
We currently have secured the last 10 Pentax 50mm F1.2A Series Lenses. Pentax
no longer make this.
Price inc VAT is GBP450 (ex VAT GBP382.97).
Contact me off list to place your order.
Kind regards from sunny Brighton
Peter
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
Apparently, Minolta with launch ultrasonic lenses (Minolta call them SSM)
at Photo Expo.
This might influence Pentax position in the AF market.
Pål
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit
Hi, Tom
I've visited your website and I've just one criticism: the pictures are
bad.
I mean, no in content, but they are pixelated or fuzzy. Maybe you did it to
avoid somebody using them? In this case it's ok, but if not, you should
correct that. I think if you make a website to show your pics,
Hi Steve,
The AF200T is a great little flash, but don`t expect it to cover
a lot of range. The AF280T is substantially more powerful,
will have a lot more reach, plus it tilts and swivels, has adapters
for wide and tele, the wide adapter is always used on mine when
shooting people, it`s kind of
Well thanks Bill, but no need. Paul is a real gentleman.
Our list is really a pretty grown-up place. g
Regards, Bob S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bob, if you need a place to sleep, I have a spare
couch...g
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Paul Jones
Subject: Re:
Steve,
There are several versions of the AF200. Some are AF200S, some are AF200Sa,
and some are AF200T. Do you have the AF200T? It is the TTL version and
works great with the Super Program. If you don't have the TTL version, that
alone is reason enough for buying an AF280T.
The AF280T is
Maciej,
It is a fine lens and a steal at the price you mentioned. I used it for many
years for indoor family portraits and outdoor people shots. It is remarkably
small and easy to handle. The f 2.0 aperture makes indoor, low light
focusing very easy.
Some have complained that it is not
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, the date back isn't discussed in the camera manual but there is a
separate manual for it. When I bought my ZX-5n QD and discovered no info
about the back in the manual, I emailed Pentax customer service, told them I
Before I had the -5n, I
This lens is about to show up in a local camera shop (the previous
owner said he will bring it soon). I don't know it's condition
yet but the price is going to be about USD 130. How do you judge
this lens? I would like to use it mainly for portraits and some
body shots from time to time.
There seems to be a whole other world out there with regards to
lenses. Everytime I look at Ebay, someone is selling a
Russian-made lens. Can somebody offer up opinions on the quality
of these lenses? While I'm on it, is there an online resource for
reviews and specs on non-Pentax glass
Will they be compatible with current bodies? or even the foveon jobbie?
-Original Message-
From: Pål Audun Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 March 2002 12:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Minolta with ultrasonic lenses at Photo Expo
Apparently, Minolta with launch
On www.photozone.de news section
Pics of new Minolta lenses mentioned by Pal,
28-80 f2.8 and 70-200 f2.8
Also:
Tokina has announced a successor for its core model -
the new AF 28-70mm f/2.8 AT-X Pro SV
16 elements in 12 groups
weight: 715g
77mm filter
0.7m close focus
~50.000 Yen
Ys, satin - sort of like the latest LX compared to the earlier ones -
that's the word for which I was looking.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They appear satin rather than gloss. I have no idea how they wear.
Kind regards from sunny Brighton
--
Sheldon Belinkoff
CREATURE'S COMFORT
510-235-7648
121mm marco I can smell it.
--- tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1 more hour.
tv
-
__
File your taxes online! http://taxes.yahoo.ca
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
I want to know it. May be Paul Stregervsky has the info?
Thanks in advance
Albano
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Is there any advantage to storing B W film in the fridge. I know
it helps with colour but what about B W ?
Cooling film in the refrigerator (or, even better, the freezer)
slows down the chemical processes that age the film. This would
help both color and bw film, and is especially true for
Have you considered using a proprietary flash bounce system instead of a
diffuser? I've seen one that you can velcro onto the the flash, providing
an angled, diffused bounce, with the added benefit of moving the actual
flash source further away from the camera, if the flash is hot-shoe
Tree on Thames, Lechlade, 2002 - Cotty
Another winner this month! Great bow of the river banks and the
reflections along the river.
Ed, thanks for your very kind words. Someone posted that it was slightly
crooked - which it is. Actually I rotated it for a print I made, but
neglected to do it
Since I'm a diver, I bought a reefmaster. Not a bad little camera for that
purpose and for the price. To get good shots, however, you need the large flash
or strobe. The small built in flash is of very little use under water. A
close-up lens is also useful.
Dan
Christian Skofteland wrote:
I am currently considering an offer to spend two months working in
sunny Bognor Regis on the southern coast of England. According to my
atlas its only a couple of hours away from London, so I can see the
possibility of a few weekend trips.
So if anyone over that way is interested in
Let there be ads, and ads, and ads, and ads...
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
Or, one of us will add it. grin
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 11:18 AM
Subject:
mike wilson wrote:
There is no
easy, cheap solution for this. Except maybe scrapping the
infested lens.
In the early stages of fungus growth, it can usually be eliminated by a good
camera tech. I spent $60 to have a lens with moderate fungus growth cleaned.
The tech reported that there
Someone once offered us 6 LXs in u/w housingsnow, if I could only
find his mail address.
KR
Peter
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery
In a message dated 20/03/02 17:52:49 GMT Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am currently considering an offer to spend two months working in
sunny Bognor Regis on the southern coast of England. According to my
atlas its only a couple of hours away from London, so I can see the
It's been a while since I've been wet but a Reefmaster would probably be my
first choice for simple underwater snapshots.
When I dove more regularly I had an Ikelite housing for the kodak disposable.
I even went so far as to remove the Kodak 400 and replace it with Fujichrome
400 slide film!
Hi all.
If you had the option of getting a tripod head with the same QR plate of
your monopod or a bigger but different one what would you choose?
In my case I'm thinking about the 141RC - Basic pan-tilt and 329 -
Compact Pro pan-tilt, both by Manfrotto. About the same weight/max.
load: 1-6 Kg.
Thanks. I'll watch out for the Monday lenses. :)
--- mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Debra Wilborn wrote:
There seems to be a whole other world out there
with
regards to lenses.
There sure is. A lot of it is exceelent stuff, too.
The only
thing to watch out for is
The miracle of the SMTP bucket brigade. Sometimes, I appear to
post the first reply to a question but my post will not appear
for half an hour or more and, meanwhile, I'll see several
answers pop up before mine shows up. It's all in the number of
hops, or systems, the mail has to go through to
Have you tried WebWasher? It's pretty good popup ad killer.
Len
I collect rare photographs... I have two... One of Houdini
locking his keys in his car... the other is a rare picture of
Norman Rockwell beating up a child. - S.W.
- Original Message -
From: T Rittenhouse [EMAIL
At the risk of sounding naive, wouldn't a couple eminutes in the microwave kill the
little buggers? Or would you risk melting the glass or the glue? What about other
forms of radiation, like the kind that was being studied to kill anthrax in mail
equipment?
Mike wrote: Immediate isolation is
With all the design and testing I do in my part time gig, as well as at my full time
gig, I have stuck with Netscape 4.7 and have refused to go any higher.
The point where AO(Hell) took over Netscape was the point where Netscape's browser
went down the tubes. I'm not a huge fan of MS, but
-
Can somebody offer up
opinions on the quality of these lenses? While I'm on
it, is there an online resource for reviews and specs
on non-Pentax glass made for K-mount?
Thank y'all all,
Deb in TX
The two Russian lenses that I know pretty well, are: Zenitar 16mm f/2,8 FishEye
Tom have you tried Mozilla .9.9 I got the latest build the
other day and it seems pretty stable. IMHO it's a great
alternative to Netscape.
T Rittenhouse wrote:
Let there be ads, and ads, and ads, and ads...
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
For those who comented my pic - thanx a lot. It was very helpful to me. The suggested
changes and croppings really do well.
Greetz
Artur
--
Okresl Swoje potrzeby - my znajdziemy oferte za Ciebie!
[ http://oferty.onet.pl ]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
-
I usually do this a lot earlier in the month, but I've been a bit tied
up this month. Anyway, here are my favorites, in no particular order.
Fishing boats by Artur Ledóchowski - love the mood, and the
contrast of the colorful boats against the muted background
Thanks,
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002 13:29:35 -0500, Evan Hanson wrote:
Tom have you tried Mozilla .9.9 I got the latest build the
other day and it seems pretty stable. IMHO it's a great
alternative to Netscape.
Where do you think Netscape comes from? :-)
Later,
Gary
-
This message is from the
Actually, letting sunlight stream through the lens a bit more
frequently is a pretty good preventive measure. Lenses that
don't get used very often are at higher risk of fungus
infection.
Len
---
At the risk of sounding naive, wouldn't a couple eminutes in
the microwave kill the little
Hello,
I was in Brazil last january and found a very old 70-300 F4.5-5.6 lens I
used to have a long time ago. I stopped using this lens because it is a
U42 and at that time I didn't have an adapter to K-mount. So, I found the lens
and it was completely full of fungus. So I gave up the lens and
The Ziploc bag approach is done by EWA-MARINE:
http://www.ewa-marine.de/English/e-start-photo.htm
Would you trust a sandwich bag to protect your
valuable camera gear? I'd
think twice about it.
Christian
It's not just a sandwich bag. It's an ewa-marine
sandwich bag. Gauranteed
Wow, imagine that. Metal lens casings! Thanks for
the good info. I think I need to do some shopping.
Deb
--- Artur Ledóchowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-
Can somebody offer up
opinions on the quality of these lenses? While I'm
on
it, is there an online resource for
Hello folks,
I have never used filtes - except UV is always mounted on both my lenses and
polarizer I use sometimes. I, however, came across some good pictures on
photo.net
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=595705,
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=608678
and while going
My point exactly. It's just Mozilla doesn't include all of
that AOL junk.
Evan
Gary Murphy wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002 13:29:35 -0500, Evan Hanson wrote:
Tom have you tried Mozilla .9.9 I got the latest build the
other day and it seems pretty stable. IMHO it's a great
alternative to
Hi,
I think Brighton's the place for that nowadays...
Notwithstanding, I think Brighton's a better place than Duxford for a
pdml bash, especially if one of our antipodean cousins is in the vicinity.
---
Bob
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wednesday, March 20, 2002, 10:38:05 AM, you wrote:
Tom have you tried Mozilla .9.9 I got the latest build the other
day and it seems pretty stable. IMHO it's a great alternative to
Netscape.
Where do you think Netscape comes from? :-)
The crazy thing is that NS and Mozilla don't necessarily act the
same. At the moment I have both NS 6.1
Hi,
this is the type of situation where an incident reading would probably
be better than a reflected reading. In general it would be better to
point the meter at the camera, but an average or split reading would
probably be ok too. Failing that, a reading off the grey card should
be the same as
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002 14:34:12 -0500, Evan Hanson wrote:
My point exactly. It's just Mozilla doesn't include all of
that AOL junk.
Yup
Later,
Gary
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
Paul wrote: wouldn't a couple eminutes in the microwave kill the little
buggers?
It might just kill your microwave too considering most lenses have at least
some metal in them.
Regards,
/\/\ick...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net
What's the URL for tracking the pool again?
R
- Original Message -
From: David A. Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 1:00 AM
Subject: Re: Limited Lens Pool
Paul Jones wrote:
Okay my guess is a 22mm/2.6 limited lense.
And i'll throw
Hi folks,
I just received a shipment from KEH yesterday. One of the items I ordered
-- which I may have to return -- is a brand new Pentax correction lens
adapter Z, in minus-three diopter. Since this was listed in KEH's Pentax
K-mount accessories page, I thought it would fit my MZ-50. Wrong!
- Original Message -
From: Maciej Marchlewski
Subject: Searching opinions on SMC M-85/2.0
Hello all!
This lens is about to show up in a local camera shop (the
previous owner said he will bring it soon). I don't know it's
condition yet but the price is going to be about USD 130.
Hmmm
I ~still~ haven't seen my reply, that you replied to. And I sent it about 10
hours ago.
Sigh...
-frank
T Rittenhouse wrote:
Quite often I see replies before, I receive the original post. Strange,
gremlins at work?
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: Anand DHUPKAR
Subject: OT - using filters
Hello folks,
I have never used filtes - except UV is always mounted on both
my lenses and
polarizer I use sometimes. I, however, came across some good
pictures on
photo.net
Hi, Len,
I ~hate~ that! I make some pithy (or at least something I think may be
pithy!), and about 5 people come through with the same info before my
post gets there an hour later.
When you have as little to say of importance as I do, timing's
everything! ;-)
regards,
frank
Len Paris wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Carl
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 8:20 AM
I've recently joined the list and have been sitting back and
watching - plenty
of opinions and info going around. Just a couple of questions:
Is there any advantage to storing B W film in the fridge. I
know it
He never said it was. He only referred to anodizing for crakshafts, not
aluminium. Read his post again...
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Rubenstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 March 2002 22:22
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Black limited lens coating - does it wear?
That should have been pithy comment...
sigh, again...
frank theriault wrote:
Hi, Len,
I ~hate~ that! I make some pithy (or at least something I think may be
pithy!), and about 5 people come through with the same info before my
post gets there an hour later.
--
The optimist thinks this
On 21 Mar 2002 at 8:33, Leon Altoff wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002 15:59:35 -0500 (EST), Brendan wrote:
For those who may have an extra one or are selling it
since they have an MZ-S with AF360 :-)
Brendan,
If you get too many offers I could use a second one. I'm still a long
way off
Statistical sample of one manufacturer's warning notwithstanding.
Otis
gfen wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Mick Maguire wrote:
Paul wrote: wouldn't a couple eminutes in the microwave kill the little
buggers?
It might just kill your microwave too considering most lenses have at least
You missed a few entries :(
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ryan K. Brooks Subject: Re: Limited Lens Pool
What's the URL for tracking the pool again?
http://www.bigdayphoto.com/limited.html
William Robb
-
This message is from the
Not one offer yet :(
BH here I come.
--- Leon Altoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002 15:59:35 -0500 (EST), Brendan
wrote:
For those who may have an extra one or are selling
it
since they have an MZ-S with AF360 :-)
Brendan,
If you get too many offers I could use a
I'd sure love to get an AF560GTZ when I get an MZ-S/D
and loose all these sync cords.
--- tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21 Mar 2002 at 8:33, Leon Altoff wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002 15:59:35 -0500 (EST), Brendan
wrote:
For those who may have an extra one or are
selling it
since
I think everyone is waiting for the replacement before
they sell their long sync cords.
--- Leon Altoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002 15:59:35 -0500 (EST), Brendan
wrote:
For those who may have an extra one or are selling
it
since they have an MZ-S with AF360 :-)
Stan,
Thanks for the insight. I was most definitely interested in the
200. I have to go back and see what it is exactly. I thought I was paying
attention when writing it down, but like a kid in a candy store I was a bit
excited with all the Pentax glass in front of me.
In my diving days, I used to have a rigid perspex camera housing which housed a Cosmic
Symbol.
Pictures were pretty rubbish, but with an average visibilty of 1.5 feet on a good day
in the Menai Straits, I couldn't expect miracles!
It was my dream to own a Nikonos, but as a student I could never
A few?
I told you yesterday you needed an aperture
tv
On 20 Mar 2002 at 18:01, Brendan wrote:
You missed a few entries :(
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users'
Alan writes:
An alternative is Metz flashes which you can switch the shoe. For instance,
Metz 40MZ3i with SCA372 shoe can do TTL flashes on any Pentax bodies which
can do TTL flash. However, since SCA372 shoe was designed for manual focus
bodies (just like AF200T etc), features like AF asist
It definitely bugs me, too. It's why I generally pass up many
questions, because I know my answer won't show up until several
others already have. It kind of inhibits spontaneity, doesn't
it?
Len
---
Hi, Len,
I ~hate~ that! I make some pithy (or at least something I
think may be
Bruce said: I know of no crankshaft using aluminum. Pistons, heads, blocks,
yes: no crankshafts.
You don't? you'd better take a look at:
http://www.autoswalk.com/bmwm1.html (6th paragraph).
Regards,
/\/\ick...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
You didn't pony up to the table with a prize.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Brendan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 5:01 PM
Subject: Re: Limited Lens Pool
You missed a few entries :(
- Original Message -
From: Brendan
I tried out an F80 today, with a USM(or whatever they call it) lens, and
although it was quiet and silky smooth, it didnt achieve focus lock any
faster than my Pentaxes. The motor moved to the right 'region' of focus
quicker, but it then did a lot of fidgetting before deciding it was
happy - my
Aw, you are just saying that because you don't want me to win.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March
William Robb wrote: You didn't pony up to the table with a prize.
He did, he offered an out of date roll of E200 that I gave him (It's been
frozen most of its life so is ok)
Regards,
/\/\ick...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and
On 20 Mar 2002 at 18:48, Mick Maguire wrote:
William Robb wrote: You didn't pony up to the table with a prize.
He did, he offered an out of date roll of E200 that I gave him (It's been
frozen most of its life so is ok)
He didn't specify an aperture, which I mentioned to him yesterday.
tv
On the subject of Metz modules, does anyone know the difference between
SCA3702 and SCA3701? The 3701 appears to be older as it pops up on eBay now
and again but is it functionally the same as the 3702? Anyone got one?
Mine is the 3701 Mk2. Other than it appears taller than the 3702, I do not
FWIW, it's an AF-S lens. If the light level was low, the AF may hunt when using
all but the center AF sensor, since that is the only cross pattern one. I also
don't know how the AF was configured. In single shot mode the default is to
find the closest subject based on the reading from all the
I recently bought a used lens on eBay. It arrived with slightly smeared
glass. I cleaned the lens, front and back, and looked through and saw little
squiggly lines 1mm or so in length a few places around the edge of the front
element. Cleaned the front some more to be sure, and confirmed that the
Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Anand!
You are quite right. The 81-series are orange coloured pieces of
glass. The intensity of the colour increase with the alphabet. 81A
gives a slight warming, B and C more and more.
Velvia is sometimes in special need of a warming filter, because it
...is off in la-la land again. No update for 24-36 hours. So if anyone
asked me anything (not sure why anyone would) I can't answer until
mail-archive comes back to life.
Joe
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
I have an old Sigma 1:2.8 35-70mm Lens laying about and it is
badly affected by fungus, I picked it up at a sale for 10 bucks
for the pruposes of disecting. So I pulled it down and to my
surprise not only was there fungus on the lense but the whole
internal workings were covered in a thin layer
I owned a Nikonos but used it sparingly. Two snorkeling vacations total. A
wonderful piece of engineering but one of my first eBay sales. It just is
not a camera to use on dry land, and I just did not need an underwater
camera. I have a friend who dives extensively (and expensively) who owns the
OK, including my question (below), I just counted 3 independent posts within
a few hours on the fungus issue. Does that prove that I am right about
fungal contagion?
Stan
From: Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 19:12:13 -0600
To: PDML [EMAIL
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
