Michel Carrère-Gée a écrit:
K/M lens could use matrix metering, see:
http://www.robertstech.com/matrix.htm
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/krg/Photo/multizone.htm
For thoses we want try, I have put a gauge on my web
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/krg/Photo/Images/bricolage/gabarit-ki.zip
I wrote an as detail
You can partition an empty disk, up until the point that there is no
'unpartitioned' space on it anymore. Without an add on tool like
partition magic, you cannot change the size of a partition once it has
been set up. Your C drive was presumably formatted with a single
partition fillinf the whole
No idea as to the validity, but the following has been lifted from
dpreview:
"I have heard a rumor that Pentax is coming out with a 4 megapixel
camera called the Pentax Optio Si. I cannot comfirm this and was
wondering if anyone else has heard about this. I was going to purchase
the Optio S, but w
No, but it sure makes me sit up and take notice...
If that's active pixels, it's only 25% more than the S version. I
wonder if you'd actually notice that 25%?
An honest question, as I don't know.
I do know, however, that with computer (CPU) speeds, in order to make
a significant step-function chang
Far more likely than a K DSLR and btw, no leak about that one so
far. Obviously Pentax agenda and ours are completely disjunctive.
:o(
Servus, Alin
Rob wrote:
RB> "I have heard a rumor that Pentax is coming out with a 4 megapixel
RB> camera called the Pentax Optio Si. I cannot comfirm
Hi Keith,
on 07 Feb 03 you wrote in pentax.list:
>No, but it sure makes me sit up and take notice...
>If that's active pixels, it's only 25% more than the S version. I
>wonder if you'd actually notice that 25%?
I would prefer the 3MP version. You don't see any difference between a
10x15cm prin
Alin wrote:
> Far more likely than a K DSLR and btw, no leak about that one so
> far. Obviously Pentax agenda and ours are completely disjunctive.
> :o(
As far as I know the DSLR is a fact and far more certain than other Optio S versions.
Anyway, as the Optio S is a runaway sucess before
I thought you guys might like a little contest. Usefilm.com is
sponsoring one with flowers as the theme. If you feel like entering feel
free. First and only prize is a set of 5 calendars of your own images.
Photographer retains all rights blah, you know the deal.
Enjoy & Good luck
al
http://www
I've been thinking about chemistry.
Long ago I developed, not from first principles, but from old formulae, a
physical developer for Holograms. The idea was that if one developed the
plate with a developer that could enhance the actual interference pattern on
the plate by giving it a physical stru
Michel Carrère-Gée <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Mark Roberts a écrit:
> > Joe Wilensky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>.
> > I believe the screw-mount adaptor insulates the contacts in the lens
> > mount so the camera acts as if there's no lens attached. Apparently,
> > those who use screw-mount le
Al Shaikh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I thought you guys might like a little contest. Usefilm.com is
>sponsoring one with flowers as the theme.
Aw hell, none of us will enter because we know Mike Johnston will walk
away with all the prizes...
:-P
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.ro
Are you using tap or bottle water.Any change in development
times noticed as mentioned by others??
Dave(who now has all the chemicals and jugs)Brooks
Begin Original Message
From: Brendan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 19:42:57 -0500 (EST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [H
I'll sacrifice myself and enter a few,just to make
him work for it
Dave(2 flowers)Brooks
Begin Original Message
From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Fri, 07 Feb 2003 07:41:02 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Photo Contest
Al Shaikh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I though
> wondering: You can
> usually easily tell the difference between tv shows/movies shot on film and
> those shot direct on video, though I'm not certain I can articulate the
> difference. Does the same difference in look apply to still photography?
Do you mean between photography and still video c
I too recently started presoaking, but I really began to believe in it when
I processed some APX 100 and after the presoak the water came out blue. I
developed the negatives in D-76 and they were beautiful.
Evan
"Brendan" wrote:
> I only recntly discovered presoak, now for some reason
> my neg
Al Shaikh wrote:
> I thought you guys might like a little contest. Usefilm.com is
> sponsoring one with flowers as the theme. If you feel like entering feel
> free. First and only prize is a set of 5 calendars of your own images.
> Photographer retains all rights blah, you know the deal.
>
> Enjoy
Ann... Just to be fair, one has to "join" PDML in order to participate in
PUG, and those donations go to support the website and pay for the prizes. I
don't think usefilm.com is making a killing on this.
My guess is that the calendars are a lot like those sold by Photographer's
Edge.
t
On 2/7/0
1) The contest is for 5 flower images, so you can show a little thought
and put together a series of decent images. Any gimp can take one decent
image by accident but putting together a mini portfolio is more of a
challenge and perhaps will help show a bit of your visual style.
2) You can put w
Hi tim,
This is what the calendars look like if you are curious:
http://digi-labs.net/
Basically we don't get a penny for putting up this contest, we give a
little publicity to the vendor and they sponsor something nice for our
members. That's the whole deal.
al
Timothy Sherburne wrote:
A
Hi Stan,
Do you leave Pentax?
Alek
Użytkownik Stan Halpin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał:
>This is an update to my previous update. Status of my items for sale listed
>below. I haven\'t placed anything on eBay yet but some, as indicated, will go
>on eBay tonight (approx 2000 Central Strd Time, GMT-6)
I already have 2 calendars with my name on it, that
and theres no way were going to win aginst that shoe
box of slides. But it's a good spot to get critique.
--- Timothy Sherburne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
> Ann... Just to be fair, one has to "join" PDML in
> order to participate in
> PUG, an
Thanks Mr. Robb.I just threw out a filter, Do'h.Back to
the Brita
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 08:31:12 -0600
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Re: [HUG] Film presoak - Cross Post
- Original Message -
From: "Da
I just saw your entry Brendan,I'm sending one tonight.I can only send
one a day anyway.I have
no jpg's in the office computer to send
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Brendan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 12:22:11 -0500 (EST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Photo Contes
Well, not really that simple. When you re-partition the drive, you'll have
to have enough space on your C:\ partition to hold the image that you made
of it originally. Mainly because the registry is going to look for all of
your programs in the same places they were before you repartitioned the
A humble and old-fashioned lens question:
What is your opinion about the SMC M 35/2.8-3.5 zoom. Could it be a
convenient alternative to a normal prime lens? Together with an LX that is.
Peter Smekal
Uppsala, Sweden
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all.
I have one S3 c/w the standard 55mm f 1.8 lens,Pentax cap,no case.
I bought this from a list member in the fall of 2001 and did not run
more than 10 rolls through it, but worked fine for me.I used
it for IR work until my SP500
On a related note, when I moved to my current location, I noticed that
I was getting water spots on my film when they dried. Basically the
water here is very hard and leaves deposits on the film surface.
Apparently it's very stubborn too, as 2 vigorous baths in distilled
water doesn't totally remov
> A humble and old-fashioned lens question: What is your opinion
> about the SMC M 35/2.8-3.5 zoom. Could it be a convenient
> alternative to a normal prime lens? Together with an LX that is.
I think you're missing some information, Peter. Is this a zoom that
you're referring to, one that zooms b
Alek,
There must be some kind of a language barrier here.
Read my post again, Mark's too. I did the same experiment.
I used a K24/2.8 lens (wide angle lens) with the PZ-1 (Z-1 by you).
I was 6 feet (2 meters) from a table lamp that I focused on.
The lamp just filled the finder [ focus ] area.
U
Hi all. I'm ready to start bathroom developing and just wondering if
this will
work.
There is one small window about 16" x 24" that needs to be covered.
Just wondering if adhering a couple of pieces of black bristol board or
similar material
I have an extra one of these, in like new condition, with box, etc.
It's $25 new at B&H; how about $15 including U.S. shipping?
Joe
Should have been 35-70,
thanks, Fred!
>> A humble and old-fashioned lens question: What is your opinion
>> about the SMC M 35/2.8-3.5 zoom. Could it be a convenient
>> alternative to a normal prime lens? Together with an LX that is.
>
>I think you're missing some information, Peter. Is this a zoo
Your window covering should work, but the true test comes from installing
the window cover, sealing the door, then standing in the darkened room with
all lights off for five minutes. During this time, your eyes will have time
to adjust to the darkness and you'll be able to see light leaks easily.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
> Hi all. I'm ready to start bathroom
> developing and just wondering if this will
> work.
> There is one small window about 16" x 24" that needs to be covered.
> Just wondering if adhering a couple
I'll take it.
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Wilensky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 1:37 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: FS: Hot shoe adapter F
>
>
> I have an extra one of these, in like new condition, with box, etc.
> It's $25 new at B&H; how about
Hi all,
Just want to say that there will be a sort of a "kick-off" or preview
of my exhibition tonight in a couple of hours.
I'm late and pretty exhausted, but I have managed to finish 12 of the
planned 24 images that finally will make the exhibition.
I'm going to put up these twelve at tonight's
On a related note, I have an extra Hot Shoe Adapter Fg which can be
had for $25. $36 new at B+H.
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Wilensky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 1:37 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: FS: Hot shoe adapter F
>
>
> I have an extra on
Good to know Tom.The water up here in Dave and Brendan country is VERY
hard.Fouled up a 40 gallon gas water heater in 14 months.Furnace humidifier last just
one season.
As i am probably only going to procces 2-3 rolls per month uuntil
summer horse season,i was planning on using the "bring
take 2 real think garbage bags and tape them to make 1
shet to cover the windown, put the board behind it.
for the door I hung a black curtatin infront on the
outside, works fine for me.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >
> Hi all. I'm ready to start
> I can print during broad daylight w/ this setup.
>
> Whatever you end up doing, you'll need to do a test to make sure the
> space is light-tight before you start printing in earnest.
>
> You probably have some b+w printing books that explain how to do
> this - you want to use the same procedure
Dave,
If you're just developing film and not printing, a changing bag works well.
Load the tank in the changing bag, then everything can be done in daylight.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 8:35 AM
Subject: OT Win
So it is strange. I also did similar test with the lamp. But centerweighted meter is
quite similar to spot if you fill the finder with light/lamp for instance and not only
in this case.
I shall check in manual. But if it does not work it could not be dispalyed if you are
working in spot meter.
Good luck!
> -Original Message-
> From: Lasse Karlsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 3:03 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Exhibition preview tonight.
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Just want to say that there will be a sort of a "kick-off"
> or preview
> of my exhib
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 8:59 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: OT Window coverings
>
> Hi Tom.
> Yes my sister gave me several books this Chritmas and the
> subject is mentioned.Right
> n
Never thought too.Thanks Tom and Bill.
I'll check into it, and availability.
Dave
> Oh. Why not use a changing bag?
>
> tv
Camper Bill Asked...
> Hey, Jerome, you coming to GFM this spring?
Thanks for asking, I almost forgot about it. It seemed too early to
discuss such things but (wow) I guess this year is progressing rather
quickly... only about 3 months away, huh?
To answer your question, yes, I plan to be ther
> -Original Message-
> From: Jerome Daryl Coombs-Reyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
> But seriously, I enjoyed meeting (dorn near!) all the
> PDMLers that showed
> up there last year at the Camera Clinic, and hope to see
> some new faces
> this year as well.
I'll be at the clinic.
>
Great! Looking forward to seeing you again. Drop Don a line at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and let him know you're coming. He will probably waive
the admission fee. I plan on bringing the Jobo Duolab so we can process E-6
while we're there.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Jerome Daryl Coombs-Re
They can't hold it without me.
Doug
at least, that's what I tell myself
At 03:22 PM 2/7/03, you wrote:
Who else is planning to make it?
Len wrote:
> They can't hold it without me.
>
> Doug
> at least, that's what I tell myself
HAR!!!
[actually, Doug, I think you're right... but still... HAR!]
On 7 Feb 2003 at 17:30, Leonard Paris wrote:
> The only sure way is to back up all of your data and then partition and
> format the drive the way that you want it. Then, you re-install all of your
> software from the original disks into the partitions in which you want them.
> Last, you brin
>> I think you're missing some information, Peter. Is this a zoom
>> that you're referring to, one that zooms beyond 35 to 35mm, that
>> is?
> Should have been 35-70, thanks, Fred!
Hmmm... A 35-35mm zoom would definitely be a candidate for
"Limited" status, wouldn't it?
Well, I can't help
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Who else is planning to make it?
http://www.grandfather.com/events/nphoto.htm
- jerome<
i am planning, but not definite yet.
Herb
Hi,
> That's what I thought when I had this setup. The perfect backup system
> Until an unknown force (ottawa hydro) blew up most of the components on my PC
>including BOTH hard drives.
> Darned unlucky. I'd have put money on it that I wouldn't have two disks fail at the
Ditto!
tom wrote:
> Good luck!
>
--
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The
pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert
Oppenheimer
WRT the bargain I got, it turns out the Super Program doesn't need a new
mount.
Those were just scratches in the pic. Picked up an AF200T for $20 today.
Nice little outfit.
But to the main point:
... tomorrow I'll fix the A135/2.8 & it's for sale.
(Not a focal length I use).
Anyway, A135/2.8 & K
On Friday, February 7, 2003, at 02:49 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
Who else is planning to make it?
I will be there to monitor your behavior Doug.
Ed Tyler
205-913-6786
www.carriagehousearts.com
- Original Message -
From: "tom"
Subject: RE: [HUG] Film presoak - Cross Post
>
> How do you know that stuff isn't supposed to be present when
> developing?
The blue dye that washes out is the anti halation layer, and perhaps some
sensitizing dyes. Once the film is exposed, it has done
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 11:37 PM
Subject: Re: Exhibition preview tonight.
> Ditto!
>
> tom wrote:
>
> > Good luck!
Thanks guys! (and to those who wrote me off-list)
(What's the level after
> -Original Message-
> From: Lasse Karlsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
> I got a lot of nice comments on the photos. I was quite pleased.
> It's very nice to have people paying attention to your stuff and
> telling you about it face to face. Many people found very specific
> details tha
Lasse,
It's very good news! I'm glad the pre-show went well. Is there a chance of
seeing your pictures (preferably those that are going on display) on the
web? Sorry, if you already posted the URL, but I'm unable to keep up with
the list (aroung 800 unread messages in my inbox now).
Regards and b
62 matches
Mail list logo
