Hello Frits,
Not having tried it, I was under the impression that the camera would
format FAT16 on cards < 2gb for maximum compatiblity. But if the card
was over 2gb then the camera would format for FAT32.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, January 9, 2004, 10:41:29 AM, you wrote:
FW> After upg
Welcome to that list! The PDML goes both ways, so to speak...
There's just been some news for owners of the ist-D digital SLR so the
traffic on the list is leaning towards the digital side today.
Christian
- Original Message -
From: "Pentax" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'd call it a hack rather than a klu(d)ge.
http://www.eps.mcgill.ca/jargon/jargon.html#hack
vs.
http://www.eps.mcgill.ca/jargon/jargon.html#kluge
Christian
- Original Message -
From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 1:36 PM
Subject: Re
You can, but in any case, use an adjustment layer. Some people feel that
Levels is more "destructive" than curves to an image, others feel that curves
gives better control. I don't know about the first (not sure even what is
meant by destructive in this sense), but the later shouldn't matter if y
Yes, there is, that is this list (also).
On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 19:37, Pentax wrote:
> Just joined the list, so I apologize if this has been asked a million times.
>
> Is there some kind of Pentax discussion list that is just for analog
> and preferably the older, all manual cameras?
>
> Thanks
After upgrading to firmware v1.10, I let my *ist D format my 512MB CF
card. I checked the CF card on my WinXP machine, and it was reported as
FAT. So that is FAT16.
I then did a format of the CF card with my CF, and changed it to FAT32.
Then I put it back in the *ist D. The camera could read it wit
A nice thing in Photoshop is that there are many ways to achieve the
same. It´s just a matter of preferences, I like the kind of control
the curves give, probably because it was the first tool I learned.
DagT
På 9. jan. 2004 kl. 19.31 skrev Frits Wüthrich:
Why not use levels for that?
On F
Just joined the list, so I apologize if this has been asked a million times.
Is there some kind of Pentax discussion list that is just for analog
and preferably the older, all manual cameras?
Thanks.
Rob
Hi,
> The new firmware fix gives you better than stop down metering. It
> is a nice solution.
I don't generally follow ist-d threads, so forgive me if I'm repeating
something, or if I've missed something about the ist-d.
It sounds to me like a solution to a problem that shouldn't exist anyway.
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
> Do these have electronic DOF preview? Do they have a way to upgrade
> the firmware?
how about by exposing a roll of film to the binary code of the upgrade, then
loading that film into the camera?
arnie
Why not use levels for that?
On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 19:04, Dag T wrote:
> I always try to stretch the scale so that the image contains both areas
> being close to the lightest and darkest values. Anything else will
> often seem grey. It´s the same thing I do in the darkroom, it is done
> by
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 01:08:40PM -0500, Bill Owens wrote:
>
> I used a blue rubber band to match the blue icons on the ist D 8-)
That's wrong. You should use a green rubber band to match the green icons.
Blue icons are relevant during preview only; it's the green icons that
make shooting easi
it's the answer.
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 12:47 PM
Subject: Re: A few more istD questions
> Is that the answer, or is it a question, Christian?
>
> Christian wrote:
>
> > - Original Mess
I used a blue rubber band to match the blue icons on the ist D 8-)
Bill
> For optimal aesthetics with black cameras, go to an eletronic components
> shop and ask for a black rubber drive belt as close as possible to the
> desired size.
>
> --
> ,_
> /_) /| /
> /
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Leonard Paris wrote:
> That's really strange, the "crippled mount" idea. I was using my Zenitar
> fisheye in aperture priority with version 1.0 of the firmware and had no
> problems.
Probably in stop down metering?
That works great with screwmount lenses on a screwmount adapt
Yes. The "listed" price is $1699 and you need to do the "Add this to
your cart to see a better price" to see $1349.95.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/09/04
I always try to stretch the scale so that the image contains both areas
being close to the lightest and darkest values. Anything else will
often seem grey. It´s the same thing I do in the darkroom, it is done
by controlling both contrast and the overall exposure. In Photoshop I
use the c
"Steve Desjardins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>LOL. I wonder if the camera companies think about the tax return bunny
>when planning US releases.
Why do you think the PMA show is in February? ;-)
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Pentax has proved by giving an example that a camera with crippled
>mount is not really so crippled. I wonder, whether they can produce an
>firmware upgrade for *ist, MZ-30 and similar cameras...
As long as you don't mind soldering a new surface-mount RO
Yes, and the Pentax Photo laboratory save in 16 bit TIFF which
Photoshop is able to handle.
DagT
På 9. jan. 2004 kl. 18.07 skrev J. C. O'Connell:
Does the istD RAW file contain 36 bit color images and
if so, can they be converted to 48 bit TIFFS for use
in photoshop?
JCO
--
That's really strange, the "crippled mount" idea. I was using my Zenitar
fisheye in aperture priority with version 1.0 of the firmware and had no
problems.
Len
---
* There's no place like 127.0.0.1
From: Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why do you think I'm asking all these questions, Boris me lad? I can see the
istd as a supplement to the leica and the mx/lx bodies, and as a replacement
for the sony digi i'm now using. i do like a lot about the digi concept, yet
there are times film works better for me. and while i like the li
The answer to your questions could vary with each individual image. Play
with it and see what you like.
Len
---
* There's no place like 127.0.0.1
From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: digital imaging question
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 20
Yes it indeed works that way. It's how I did it. Just make sure your
batteries are fresh or run the camera from the AC adaptor as it says in the
directions. The .bin file needs to be in the root directory of the CF card,
NOT in the DCIM subdirectory.
Len
---
* There's no place like 127.0.0.1
Is that the answer, or is it a question, Christian?
Christian wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jeff Jonsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > NR Is Noise Reduction, CF? Compact Flash, Captured Frames? I dunno
> > either.
> >
> > Jeff
>
> How about Custom Functions. That's where you turn
That is my plan as well. No need to dump it, just let it be the
backup when the next great body is released (hopefully not too quick
for my pocketbook).
Bruce
Friday, January 9, 2004, 9:03:16 AM, you wrote:
RS> On 9 Jan 2004 at 15:36, Cotty wrote:
>> I'll pick up a used *ist D in 2 years fo
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 11:48:28PM -0500, Stan Halpin wrote:
> I would like a viewfinder eyecup that stays in place.
The solution to this notorious Pentax ailment is simple:
Wrap a 5-7mm wide rubber band around the eyecup. This keeps the eyecup in
place, and protects the diopter slider from acc
Out of interest, what are some currently available
Japan-only Pentax items? I am aware of the
black-colored limited lenses for starters and the
silver accented MZ-S. Any other lenses (not just
colors)? And is the MZ-3 still available in Japan?
Or are any Z1-p cameras available over there (since
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Boris Liberman wrote:
> mount is not really so crippled. I wonder, whether they can produce an
> firmware upgrade for *ist, MZ-30 and similar cameras...
Do these have electronic DOF preview? Do they have a way to upgrade
the firmware?
I was talking to a friend about the chanc
Silly question I asked. (Can you get the update by removing the CF
card?) Of course it works. I just did it.
Thanks to anyone who answered.
Joe
I say that since the *ist is not a digital camera per se, there would be
no way to "upgrade" the firmware, without sending it back to Pentax to
have whatever ROM chip that holds the operating information, upgraded or
replaced.
Jeff.
-Original Message-
From: Boris Liberman [mailto:[EMAIL P
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> is it better to:
>
> 1. center the recorded histogram
> 2. bias the histogram towards the lighter tones taking care not
>no clip any highlights
> 3. bias the histogram towards the darker tones taking care not
>to clip any of the darker/black to
Hi!
Pentax has proved by giving an example that a camera with crippled
mount is not really so crippled. I wonder, whether they can produce an
firmware upgrade for *ist, MZ-30 and similar cameras...
Especially, with compatibility with M and K lenses, *ist may become
quite attractive camera, right?
A problem that does not occur is one you don't have to worry about. Take
two pictures and call me in the morning.
Len
---
* There's no place like 127.0.0.1
From: "Steve Desjardins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Firmware 1.10 and M lens
D
You know, with these fixes and at $1350 (B&H) this is a pretty nice camera.
I'm now deeply curious at the proposed "low end" Baby D.
Steven Desjardins
$1350?
Andre
Very, Very Funny. Now I understand the stupid name. . .
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/09/04 10:30AM >>>
Steve Desjardins wrote:
> You know, with these fixe
It's always good to complain. Praise is nice, but Pentax can only learn
from complaints. From a business (and pedagogical, for that matter)
POV, complaints are more valuable than praise.
OTOH, I do think that most of us would recommend the *ist D, which is
the practical version of praise. Like
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, keller.schaefer wrote:
> Yes, no doubt. But there still is room for further development. There already
> are 5MP sensors 7.2x5.3mm large. An APS sized sensor with this pixel density
> would have 46 MP. So a good quality 10+ MP APS sensor is nothing unthinkable,
> right?
The noi
On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 21:58, Naomi van der Lippe wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Hope all the New Year's resolutions are holding up!
>
> I have seen a photo in a pamphlet on photography which I would like to
> re-create and, if successful, to display on PUG sometime. Would this not be
> seen as "photo-plagi
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, Rob Studdert wrote:
> You could always edit the EXIF data manually after the fact :-)
Do you have any recommendations on how to do that? I'd like to be able to
both edit the text and number values, as well as insert the 120x160 pixel
thumbnail into image files that compeletly
Just like a Spottie . . .
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/09/04 10:49AM >>>
> The things I would like to have fixed :
>
> When lens ring not at A, to have the aperture value displayed,
instead of
"--"
Can you not remember what f-stop you set manually?
Bill
On 9 Jan 2004 at 16:56, keller.schaefer wrote:
> Yes, no doubt. But there still is room for further development. There already
> are 5MP sensors 7.2x5.3mm large.
They are poor performers relative to sensors the density of the *ist D, they
also start becoming unsharp from f11 due to diffraction e
Aha, that's what B&H is for!
Jeff Jonsson
-Original Message-
From: Rothman, Aric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 8:59 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: FS Friday: 50mm f/1.4
William,
Thanks for the info. I wended my way back through recent messages and
I use the A version on my *ist D and I really like this. What's funny
is that the image in the viewfinder appears almost exactly life size,
i.e., one eye in the viewfinder and one open to the world get the same
image.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexing
A couple of interesting flashes:
>
>Cokin Creative Flash
>
>Sunpak 120J Bare Bulb kit
Have any of you ever used a bare bulb strobe? I know Greywolf has a Norman,
but that doesn't count. I once had a Vivitar 5600 with bare bulb head, was
obsessed with the idea of fill-in for ultrawides, but never
On 9 Jan 2004 at 15:36, Cotty wrote:
> I'll pick up a used *ist D in 2 years for a song ;-)
You really think so? My *ist D is destined to be my "second" body.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publi
On 9 Jan 2004 at 7:36, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> What's "HDR images?"
High Dynamic Range Images
http://positron.cs.berkeley.edu/~gwlarson/pixformat/
http://www.google.com.au/search?q=HDR+image
See past thread: Re: ist-D multi-exposure (was:Re: My first *ist D gallery)
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AU
William,
Thanks for the info. I wended my way back through recent messages and found the
details. The ist-D keeps looking
better and better. I really enjoyed working with it at the store. The problem is,
Pentax lenses seem hard to come by,
at least here in the US. Does Pentax have a greater
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Steve Jolly wrote:
> Hmm, Jessops (UK) have it listed at £1199.00, which with the exchange
> rate currently at ~$1.80 to the pound isn't very funny...
We (UK) will never match US prices.
However, our mate from sunny Brighton gives you the grip as well for
the same price (bund
> The things I would like to have fixed :
>
> When lens ring not at A, to have the aperture value displayed, instead of
"--"
Can you not remember what f-stop you set manually?
Bill
Yes, no doubt. But there still is room for further development. There already
are 5MP sensors 7.2x5.3mm large. An APS sized sensor with this pixel density
would have 46 MP. So a good quality 10+ MP APS sensor is nothing unthinkable,
right?
Sven
Zitat von Dag T <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> There is.
>
"I'll pick up a used *ist D in 2 years for a song ;-)"
The real competition at the low end for new impecunious digital users?
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, mapson wrote:
> What zoom lens (wide-ish angle) would you recommend for istD?
>
> I have 'regular' Pentax17-28mm, Pentax 28-70 f4 and Tokina 28-70 f2.6/2.8
> but, as you all well know, they suddenly got 'narrower' with the purchase
> od the digital camera. Hence I need something
I'm curious about the high end baby...
Ziggy
-Original Message-
From: Steve Desjardins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 January 2004 15:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: version 1.1
Funny, but someone (or several folks) actually suggested the use of the DOF
feature for th
Cotts,
I know that you never left. Just a wind up. I'm glad that you still have the
MXs, great camera. I nearly went your way but now same as you, digital, will
never go back. Left with an LX, MZ£ and MZS.
We have a monthly competition at work, winner picks subject, all vote, all
nice and friend
Hi Juey,
I understand it was probably meant as friendly concern, but given the way it
was slipped in, I thought you made it sound like it was a problem specific
to Singapore when it's not, really.
Countries I've been to include Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, Brunei, Hong
Kong, Australia (Perth,
- Original Message -
From: "Rothman, Aric"
Subject: RE: FS Friday: 50mm f/1.4
> Mark,
>
> What modification had to be made to make the M series lens work on the
ist-D? I tried to use the very same lens on an
> ist-D at the local shoppe, but could only use it at full aperture.
Camera
LOL. I wonder if the camera companies think about the tax return bunny
when planning US releases.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/09/04 09:17AM >>>
Right h
On 9/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>Hey Cotts,
>
>Come back and join the gang.
>
>
>Ziggy
My dear Ziggo,
I never left. I still have a pair of MXs and a 3 Pentax lenses, one of
which I use often ;-)
If you mean that I could sell up the Canon stuff and get an *ist D, I
can't. The
The FF sensor issue is a question of cost plain and simple. I doubt
Pentax will come out with a 2000+ USD camera, and will use whatever
sensor falls in this range for their high end DSLR. The "higher" end
market will be C and N. I'm also pretty sure that Pentax's efforts will
be focused for a whi
What's "HDR images?"
Rob Studdert wrote:
> I'd like to be able to dial up +/- 3 stops or more as this would
> assist greatly when shooting with a view to producing HDR images.
Steve Desjardins wrote:
You know, with these fixes and at $1350 (B&H) this is a pretty nice
camera. I'm now deeply curious at the proposed "low end" Baby D.
Hmm, Jessops (UK) have it listed at £1199.00, which with the exchange
rate currently at ~$1.80 to the pound isn't very funny... unlike the
I'm actually selling the PZ-1p kit to enable my purchase of an MZ-S,
not an *ist D. After trying out an MZ-S, I'm quite impressed. But
both cameras have quite a few points in their favor, and it's very
difficult to pick either one as clearly superior. The "ideal"
high-end modern Pentax film cam
On 9 Jan 2004 at 9:31, Christian wrote:
> how about releasing some better RAW conversion and photo-browsing
> software? I'd like to see a re-sizable, zoomable "Photo Laboratory" window more
> than anything at this point.
Definitely however I would also like a few more of the firmware enchant
Well, I'm not using this drum set anymore (after two hand surgeries it has
gotten too expensive and painful). As soon as I can sell it I will buy the
*thingy D.
David Madsen
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.davidmadsen.com
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 13:06, Bob W wrote:
> (For the benefit of our US readers, Steptoe & Son is the original of
> Sanford & Son).
"Stiefbeen en zoon" in the Netherlands
--
Frits Wüthrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Funny, but someone (or several folks) actually suggested the use of the
DOF feature for the use of M/K lenses. I wonder if someone at Pentax
picked up on this, or if they had already thought to do this and had
simply rushed the camera to market before they could implement this
feature.
You know,
Count me in. One Giant step forward..
Vic
So, how many of the list are now considering the istD now that it will
work better with the K and M lenses? I'm now giving it some thought.
shel
Oops, Meant to reply about Joe Wilensky's post. He's the one selling the
PZ-1p kit. Same thing. Joe, don't do it!
Jeff Jonsson
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Jonsson
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 8:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: For sale Friday
I wouldn't sell my PZ-1p for an
Hey Cotts,
Come back and join the gang.
Ziggy
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 January 2004 15:13
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: firmware update
On 9/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>I walked right into that one, didn't I :-)
Let's put
On 9 Jan 2004 at 17:09, mapson wrote:
> Did anyone find a significant difference in quality between TIFF, RAW and
> the 'best' JPG while using *istD?
TIFF and 'best' JPG are very similar in quality, the TIFF has the edge in
quality (but only if you intend to make extensive modifications to the
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
> Got an M series 50/1.4 that I'd like to sell. It's in EX+ condition.
> Veeery nice ;) includes rear cap but not front. $50.00 plus shipping.
>
> Works on the *ist-D now ;-)
>
Mark,
What modification had to be ma
Hi Bill,
on 09 Jan 04 you wrote in pentax.list:
>My guess is that this is a warning that if you change either the aperture or
>shutter speed, the green button needs to be pressed again.
Or if the light changes or you point the camera to another direction...
Cheers, Heiko
how about releasing some better RAW conversion and photo-browsing
software? I'd like to see a re-sizable, zoomable "Photo Laboratory" window
more than anything at this point.
Christian
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Desjardins"
Subject: RE: Firmware 1.10 and M lens
> I just did the upgrade. This whole process is now eerily similar to my
> Spottie. It does work fine, however, and it meters correctly as my 4
> shot test run indicates. Very acceptable result from my
My guess is that this is a warning that if you change either the aperture or
shutter speed, the green button needs to be pressed again.
Think I'll go out and shoot some with the Vivitar S1 70-210.
Bill
> My only confusion is that the associated paperwork on how to use HyM
> still warns about a p
Right here. Wasn't even on the radar screen before, now I'm rethinking
how much I want to spend on a bike when the tax return bunny visits me.
William in Utah.
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PDML" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, Janu
Hi Steve ...
I'm looking at the current model - or perhaps the less expensive one
mentioned here earlier - as a replacement for my 4mp Sony and as a
supplement to my film cameras. Personally, I don't see a need for a larger
sensor or higher pixel count ... of course, that may change should I move
There is.
Such things as noise/sensitivity considerations and diffraction limits.
DagT
På 9. jan. 2004 kl. 15.00 skrev keller.schaefer:
A full frame DSLR would just not fit into this picture - and there is
no reason
to believe that APS sized sensors cannot be developed further to
achieve high
I just did the upgrade. This whole process is now eerily similar to my
Spottie. It does work fine, however, and it meters correctly as my 4
shot test run indicates. Very acceptable result from my POV.
My only confusion is that the associated paperwork on how to use HyM
still warns about a possib
Interesting. I wonder why Thomas lost his date-time settings.
stan
Dag T wrote:
I used the card, and date and time was preserved.
DagT
>>På 9. jan. 2004 kl. 13.46 skrev Stan Halpin:
>>
>> I downloaded direct to the camera instead of putting the
>> installer on a CF card and putting that to th
It's on my to-buy-someday-soon list.
( Now, where's that lotto ticket? )
>So, how many of the list are now considering the istD now that it will
>work better with the K and M lenses? I'm now giving it some thought.
>shel
Of course I don't 'know' what will happen - but wouldn't this be a big, big
surprise, given that they have stopped developing their full frame DSLR in
favour of the *ist D and have started developing and selling lenses with a
smaller image circle?
To me this looks like a complete change of directio
Kevin,
Does this mean the camera can write to this FAT16 card of 4GB, but the
OS of the PC can not read beyond 2GB? No, probably it can't read it at
all as the cluster sizes are too big. Then why use >2GB flash cards? I
am confused.
On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 10:59, Kevin Waterson wrote:
> This one ti
I used the card, and date and time was preserved.
DagT
På 9. jan. 2004 kl. 13.46 skrev Stan Halpin:
I downloaded direct to the camera instead of putting the installer on
a CF card and putting that to the camera.
Date - time and all other settings were preserved.
Stan
Thomas Stach wrote:
th
I downloaded direct to the camera instead of putting the
installer on a CF card and putting that to the camera.
Date - time and all other settings were preserved.
Stan
Thomas Stach wrote:
this is Thomas from Germany!
I also just installed the new firmware; all language settings and user
set
http://www.elvum.net/gallery/barnes_flat/trandem_mounting
Possibly not the best-taken photo ever, but quite fun :-)
S
frank theriault wrote:
I've sort of been collecting photos of "people and their bikes" over the
last while, and I've started to get them printed. My first large print
was of t
wendy beard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Dag T wrote:
>>
>>Very nice!
>>
>>There´s an M* 300mm for sale here for about $350. Maybe I can buy it
>>now :-)
>
>Sell you mine for that price if you want!
Oh great. Prices on K and M lenses are going back up again already!
--
Mark Roberts
Photography
I really like that feature on my Sony. It allows me to shoot a big TIFF and also a
small
JPEG for a quick view of the frame in the PS browser window or for a quick run through
in
other software without having to wait for the big TIFF files to load. It gives me a
quickie
email file should that
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Kostas Kavoussanakis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 2:47 AM
> http://www.camilynne.com
>
> If you look through a bunch of her stuff you will note that many shots
> are very tight (cropping into the hea
At 04:13 AM 09/01/2004 -0500, you wrote:
From: Dag T <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Very nice!
There´s an M* 300mm for sale here for about $350. Maybe I can buy it
now :-)
DagT
Sell you mine for that price if you want!
Wendy Beard,
Ottawa, Canada
http://www.beard-redfern.com
8MP and full frame sensor (Want). Then it would be like the DSLR Pentax
teased us with. Enough of this APS in 35mm, 35mm in 645 crap.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
Cotty wrote:
> Which begs the question: what improvements are wanted / needed on the
> *ist D rev2 ?
> Cheers,
> Cotty
I walked right into that one, didn't I :-)
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "pentax list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 7:47 AM
Subject: Re: firmware update
> Hey Bill, I'm eating. Right after I go take a few shots with USM and
IS...
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Cotty wrote:
> Hey Bill, I'm eating. Right after I go take a few shots with USM and IS
Did you add these to the 50/1.2 or are you using the Takumar (which
always came with these)?
:-)
I am also wondering (genuinely this time) how much the motors built
into the Canon lens
On 9/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>I am considering getting one, although I would like to see what the second
>generation dslr will have for improvements. Canon had the D30. There were
>some yelps about some of the features which resulted in the D60. So I am
>going to wait a bit to see wh
Hey Bill, I'm eating. Right after I go take a few shots with USM and IS
;-)
>Yeah, C and N users, eat your hearts out! 8-)
>
>> Ain't that a kick!
>>
>> Bill Owens wrote:
>>
>> > Seems to me that the ist D is now basically compatible with all past
>lenses.
>> >
>> > Bill
>>
>>
> So, how many of the list are now considering
the istD now that it will
> work better with the K and M lenses? I'm now giving it some thought.
>
> shel
>
I'm still debating.
I want to upgrade from the curent 2.74 meg camera i currently own,D1, to
"John Francis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I still
>thought that the hyper manual stop-down metering was too much to expect.
This idea may have been nixed because of concerns about battery drain.
The stop-down solenoid may not draw a *lot* of current, it's probably a
significant amount in the con
"keller.schaefer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Zitat von Kevin Waterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> This one time, at band camp, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> There is always the digital only 16-45 that is coming out. You didn't
>>> mention whether you needed it to work on a film ca
On 8/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>PS. More difficult than reading it would be the scrambling.. you missed an
>'e' in your 'blivee' :-) A useful way to do it is start the first letter,
>and alternate the following letters with a left and right arrow key, then
>ending with the correct last le
101 - 200 of 228 matches
Mail list logo
