From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Steve Jolly
OK. This is going to be bloody impossible to do entirely in text without
attachments, but I'll give it a try. :-)
I read it while sober.
Didn't make much sense.
I just read it while inebriated.
Didn't make any sense.
Can't I just think of
I've taken quite a few shots of this subject, and this photo has been
sitting in photoshop for a day and a half while I've debated whether or
not to post it, but now I've looked at it too many times and have no
idea of its merits. It's just annoying to me that I can't make a
stunning image
Hi all,
A photo from a place I was wanting to return to this weekend. I would
have gone if the weather forecasts had been accurate :(
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/cgi-bin/paw.cgi?date=14-Nov-2004
Cheers,
- Dave
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/
On 13/11/04, Peter J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
If you bought one outside the US and brought it in you became Grey
market importer
and only the legal importer was allowed to import the brand. You
wouldn't want to dilute
the brand value would you?
So what if someone was stationed in
For me the best use of the new DA-14 lens on my *istD is making fun pictures
like these:
http://www.radeldudel.de/images/0411Ju2.JPG
I tried making 'normal' pictures with this lens, but they all turned out
boring.
Sam
Not mine.
http://dizin.co.kr/dipeople/proreview/ds/02.htm
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Funny you should ask: I was just leaving the house to make test shots,
comparing
Tokina 2.8-4.3/28-70mm
Tokina AT-X ProII 2.6-2.8/28-70mm
Pentax SMC-F 4-5.6/35-80mm
The only standard zoom lenses I have got until I get myself a 18-35mm,
18-50mm or a 16-45mm.
I'll check the focusing as well and
På 14. nov. 2004 kl. 00.15 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dag said: (among other things) --
Of course the situation is more detailed. Among other things it
depends on when you lost the stereoscopic vision (I lost mine at the
worst time, around 2-3), if you have any cooperation between the eyes
at all
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 03:00:52 -0800, Alan Chan wrote:
Not mine.
http://dizin.co.kr/dipeople/proreview/ds/02.htm
Interesting that they are all taken with Limited lenses.
Leon
http://www.bluering.org.au
http://www.bluering.org.au/leon
Alan Chan wrote:
Not mine.
http://dizin.co.kr/dipeople/proreview/ds/02.htm
Beautiful Fall colors! So enjoyable ~ peaceful...
keith
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
William Robb wrote:
I read it while sober.
Didn't make much sense.
I just read it while inebriated.
Didn't make any sense.
Can't I just think of it as a roll of pennies on a table top and get on
with life?
:-)
Seriously though, thanks for the effort, sorry it was lost on my feeble
brain.
I got
Jens Bladt wrote:
Funny you should ask: I was just leaving the house to make test shots,
comparing
Tokina 2.8-4.3/28-70mm
Tokina AT-X ProII 2.6-2.8/28-70mm
Pentax SMC-F 4-5.6/35-80mm
This lens is, I think, still made. I used mine extensively on recent
trips and find that at 35mm, wide open, it's
William Robb wrote:
I just read it while inebriated.
Me too. Nice feeling. I don'r give s**t. Life is cool.
Actually your explanation did make sense.
Though I didn't grasp nearly all of it
it helped to learn that they are processed
in blocks.
Helps me understand the behavior of both
highly compressed and multiple generation
jpeg files.
Don't feel your efforts were totally wasted,
I at least have a clue
You guys are a better resource than the site...
Get the echeque book out.LOL
I suppose the answer is I have to upgrade my
browser -
I can up load single photos into the single photo
folder but
after creating a flora folder I don't seem to be
able to load anything into it.
THe single
Hi,
sorry for not posting this on Friday but I simply forgot - there
was our Senate elections second stage and I had to photograph
there. I was going from election room to another and then to the HQ
of one candidate (Green) to see the celebrations (yes he won).
I was cleaning the
I put this stereo adapter on my 4x5?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=29971item=3852993942rd=1
Anyone done it?
Collin
You impress at a distance, but you impact a life up close. The closer the
relationship the greater the impact.
Howard Hendricks
You shouldn't have to create a presentation to put pictures in a
folder. If your images are PhotoShop jpegs, you will have to do a save
for web to strip the exif data and make them PhotoNet compatible. I
have no idea why your browser would limit you in PhotoShop. I use both
Safari and Explorer
On Nov 13, 2004, at 11:50 PM, David Mann wrote:
. You can use ColorSync if you want, but I have heard that Adobe's
CMM is better than Apple's.
Perhaps, but when used with an Apple Cinema Display and the Epson 2200,
Colorsynch can match the monitor image with exactitude. It may not work
as
Cool. What is that. I didn't see it. Is it in Millennium Park? I only
had four or five hours of free time, so I did about two hours on North
Michigan Avenue and another two hours in Andersonville.
Paul
On Nov 14, 2004, at 2:08 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Paul,
Better photos of the Chicago ship.
Hi,
I am considering upgrading the graphic card in my computer. I have
read that most of the 32-bit graphic modes are in reality 24-bit
anyway, but that some cards offer true 32 or 30 bit colour modes
(e.g. Matrix Parhelia). Does anybody please know more?
1) is there an advantage
Sunday, November 14, 2004, 2:10:30 PM, Collin wrote:
CRB I put this stereo adapter on my 4x5?
Interesting idea. The openings would surely limit FOV, but depending
upon lens used, it might give you two 2x5 stereo images! Now just get
two lantern slide projectors, two polarisers and polarising
Yesterday's mail included the new BH catalog. They are showing the
*istDS at $899. For the DA 16-45 they said you had to call for a price.
That usually means it's priced below dealer wholesale. Still no listing
for the DA 14/2.8.
Paul
Still no sign of it on their website. Guess we'll have to wait until
later in the week to see.
IL Bill
On Nov 14, 2004, at 7:29 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Yesterday's mail included the new BH catalog. They are showing the
*istDS at $899. For the DA 16-45 they said you had to call for a
price.
Got busy Friday night and developed a few rolls of Tmax 100 from Sept and
October. Some
swamps
and Split rail fences on roll two,but i like this one of Copper. Very over cast
day,in the
hills of
Madawaska Ontario,K1000 with 35-80 4.5/5.6 zoom,developed in Tmax developer. I
went over
the time
Man doesn't he think he's King O' the Beasts!
Excellent!
Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 3:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Paw Another shot of Copper in BW
Got busy Friday night and developed a few
Dave, how did you get this to the web,
did you scan the neg or the print?
Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 3:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Paw Another shot of Copper in BW
Got busy Friday night and
Hi,
so ok, New York's not Chicago, and walking isn't the same as going on
the bus, but so what?
Yesterday I went to the exhibition of Robert Frank's photos at Tate
Modern - http://www.tate.org.uk/modern/exhibitions/frank/about.shtm
I didn't get chance to see as much as I'd hoped because my
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 14:23:22 +0100, Frantisek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) is there an advantage in working in 32 or 30 bit mode?
no. i don't think there's any advantage whatsoever.
best,
mishka
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: A Question About Macro Lenses
As for indisputable proof, my burden isnt
any greater than yours and is based on the
simple concept that lenses that do less can
do what little they do better that lenses that do
more (prime vs zoom
That rocks too. I have managed to get focused pictures with the 500
in almost total darkness.
Sounds great, I can't wait to try it.
John
-- Original Message ---
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 21:06:50 + (GMT)
- Original Message -
From: Sam Jost
Subject: Re: JPEG Compression Made Slightly-Less-Complicated (was Re:
Reducing File Size with Photoshop)
Was my translation ok for you?
Works for me.
Thanks
William Robb
Paul - or anyone: what's the crop factor for the istd v 35mm lens (1.5?
1.6?)
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yesterday's mail included the new BH catalog. They are showing the
*istDS at $899. For the DA 16-45 they said you had to call for a price.
That
Hi Dave
I don't usually comment on too many dog pics, for most are just too cute
and saccharin for my taste, and I'm not the biggest admirer of dogs in
general. I say this not to alienate any dog fanciers but to emphasize how
much I like this portrait of Copper. Although it has a few
So, I tested my lenses. It's really, really bad. My Tokina is absolutely
worthless.
It may be due to wrong focusing on a digital, but I doubt it.
I always have considered this an excellent lens. Befor I bought it I tested
it agains
my Pentax FA 28-80mm Powerzomm, and found that the Tokina was
Hi all,
I tried searching the archives, but could not find
this. Also, someone sent me some info. awhile ago,
but I lost it. I'm trying to find a bracket that
would hold a flash and an umbrella, mounted into a
standard tripod thread. Does anyone know if this even
exists? I've search BH,
For display you twit...
(You should really keep up on these threads).
Caveman wrote:
Why do you want to reduce file size ? Storage space is so cheap now.
It doesn't really matter.
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of
I use a Tokina ATX f2.8 35-70mm. It is sharp f5.6-f11. The ATX lens was
tested by Modern Photography Sept 1985.
Jonathan
-Original Message-
From: Keith Whaley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 4:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tokina 1:2.8~4.3 28-70mm
It depended on the distributors agreement, with a Benz, I don't know...
Cotty wrote:
On 13/11/04, Peter J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
If you bought one outside the US and brought it in you became Grey
market importer
and only the legal importer was allowed to import the brand. You
According to PhotoShop CS it's 1.5. (PS CS RAW converter lists both the
true focal length and the 35mm equivelant in the metadata.)
On Nov 14, 2004, at 10:46 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Paul - or anyone: what's the crop factor for the istd v 35mm lens (1.5?
1.6?)
Shel
[Original Message]
From:
LOL
I wish I could be so succinct and direct
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 11/14/2004 8:09:57 AM
Subject: Re: OT: Reducing File Size with Photoshop
For display you twit...
(You should really keep up on these threads).
Jens Bladt escribió:
So, I tested my lenses. It's really, really bad. My Tokina is absolutely
worthless.
It may be due to wrong focusing on a digital, but I doubt it.
I always have considered this an excellent lens. Befor I bought it I tested
it agains
my Pentax FA 28-80mm Powerzomm, and found
My god, he's about to be attacked by a duck!
I suppose that's one way to get close to them, annoy them until they attack.
Sam Jost wrote:
For me the best use of the new DA-14 lens on my *istD is making fun
pictures like these:
http://www.radeldudel.de/images/0411Ju2.JPG
I tried making 'normal'
Paul Stenquist wrote:
You shouldn't have to create a presentation to put pictures in a
folder. If your images are PhotoShop jpegs, you will have to do a save
for web to strip the exif data and make them PhotoNet compatible. I
have no idea why your browser would limit you in PhotoShop. I use
So I leave Singapore for the UK tomorrow, and am going to miss a good part
of the Buskers' Festival. Anyway, Canon's a major sponsor and they're
holding a digital photography competition over the week to get the best
'Busker's Moment'. Up for grabs is black 300D kit and some photo printer,
which
1:5 supposedly, I get a very different result using angle of view
comparisons using fCalc.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Paul - or anyone: what's the crop factor for the istd v 35mm lens (1.5?
1.6?)
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yesterday's mail included
It's only disadvantages is that it has noticeable distortion at 28mm
and that is flare prone? HAR!
Thats like buying a car with its only disadvantages being a wimpy
engine and a bad suspension...
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Carlos Royo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday,
anyone know the dimensions of the active area of
the sensor? it would be simple to calculate.
I thought someone said it was 1.55 here a long
time ago when the camera came out.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Peter J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 11:33
I like the concept. It seems there are two things that detract for
me. One is that the peeled bark near the top and out into the green
is soft and my eye is drawn to it. That needs to be sharply in focus.
The other is that the main trunk is quite flat in lighting. Maybe a
reflector to punch it
I like it overall, but wish there was a sense of scale. I have no
idea how big this thing is. The colors are very nice and the blue sky
accentuates it well. Might be nice to burn in the shadowed rocks just
a touch more.
Bruce
Sunday, November 14, 2004, 12:50:19 AM, you wrote:
DM Hi all,
DM
I have one called Sof' Shoulder. However, I bought it 25 years ago, so
I don't remember who made it. It's a very nice setup for on camera
flash, but it can also be mounted on a tripod.
On Nov 14, 2004, at 11:06 AM, Steve Pearson wrote:
Hi all,
I tried searching the archives, but could not find
That's me always the diplomat.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
LOL
I wish I could be so succinct and direct
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 11/14/2004 8:09:57 AM
Subject: Re: OT: Reducing File Size with Photoshop
For display you twit...
Dave,
That is a nice shot! The background is great and having him standing
up on the rock...The only improvement I can think of would be to have
him looking directly at you.
Bruce
Saturday, November 13, 2004, 5:19:45 PM, you wrote:
bcin Got busy Friday night and developed a few rolls of Tmax
I have found it no more prone to flare than other wide angle lenses. I good
lens hood is usually crutial for a wide angel, isn't it?
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: J. C. O'Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 14.
Hi Ann,
Congratulations. I'm going to go take a look.
If you want pictures to appear in a certain order, you have to upload
them in order. The last one to be uploaded will be the first one
displayed. I did that with my wakeboarding folder. Creating a
presentation will also allow you to place
I have this lens, and I also had the F 35-80 4-5.6, until I sold the
latter last January, and the Tokina is sharper. In fact, it is very
sharp for a zoom lens, its only disadvantages being noticeable
barrel distortion at 28 mm. and that it is a flare prone lens,
compared to SMC Pentax lenses.
Hmm.. I didn't get the original message. I guess better late than never..
Howard never really believed his folks when they told him it wasn't
abnormal to have an early growth spurt..
Sam, what a fantastic pic! I love it! Do a series!
Cheers,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: Peter J.
Yes,
It's one of the new sculptures in Millenium Park.
The visual impact is stunning in contrast to the right angles in the buildings.
Bob
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 08:20:25 -0500, Paul Stenquist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cool. What is that. I didn't see it. Is it in Millennium Park? I only
had four
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 09:12:50 +0100, Sam Jost wrote:
The image format for your pennies are called fractal compressors.
Other compression types that could be considered analogous to the
pennies example would be Run-Length encoding and Quad-Tree encoding.
In Run-Length Encoding (RLE), the pennies
Are there any differences between 100 mm f/2.8 F Macro and 100 mm f2.8 FA
Macro, let's say in optics or mechanics?
Peter, Sweden
J. C. O'Connell escribi:
It's only disadvantages is that it has noticeable distortion at 28mm
and that is flare prone? HAR!
Thats like buying a car with its only disadvantages being a wimpy
engine and a bad suspension...
Every 24-to-something or 28-to-something I've had or used showed more
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 08:29:24 -0500, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Yesterday's mail included the new BH catalog. They are showing the
*istDS at $899. For the DA 16-45 they said you had to call for a price.
That usually means it's priced below dealer wholesale. Still no listing
for the DA 14/2.8.
I
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
It's only disadvantages is that it has noticeable distortion at 28mm
and that is flare prone? HAR!
Thats like buying a car with its only disadvantages being a wimpy
engine and a bad suspension...
Actuall, no, it's like buying a car with little
Jens Bladt escribió:
I have found it no more prone to flare than other wide angle lenses. I good
lens hood is usually crutial for a wide angel, isn't it?
I always use it with the original hood, but in the bright sunny days so
common here in Southern Europe, it is evident that this lens flares
So Sam,
Did you buy the insurance? (AFLAK Duck)
Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 11:25:17 -0500, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My god, he's about to be attacked by a duck!
I suppose that's one way to get close to them, annoy them until they attack.
Sam Jost wrote:
For me
Peter,
The optical formula and mechanics are different.
I don't have the FA or F, but I believe both use internal focus mechanisms.
Theses lenses don't change length as you focus.
I am not sure if there is much difference in image quality.
I'd be interested in any comparisons.
Regards, Bob S.
Who says you can't use telephoto lenses for landscapes...
Certainly not me. I regularly use 200, 300 600 mm lenses for landscapes
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 12:47 AM
Subject: PESO --
Bob,
I'm afraid both lenses are not IF...
I have the FA100/2.8 and the front bit does stick out when I focus.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 1:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 100 mm f/2.8 F Macro - 100 mm
David, my take on your image is that there are the makings of a good image
there, IMHO you need to get closer and extract some of the detail shown
make it more abstract. As it is posted it's a picture of tree bark, nothing
more, nothing less.
Hope this helps makes sense.
Kenneth Waller
-
Very nicely composed. You've obtained a nice
balance between light dark, substance void.
Good eye!
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 3:50 AM
Subject: PAW - Triangle
Hi all,
A photo from a
On 15/11/04, Ryan Lee, discombobulated, unleashed:
So I leave Singapore for the UK tomorrow
Look me up after you've settled in down in Devon. I'll let you play with
some 'real' lenses ;-)
have a good trip.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Here you go: http://tinyurl.com/6r7ff
This guy has all kinds of cool stuff!
I'm sure he'll sell the flash/umbrella mount seperately.
All you need to mount on a tripod is a 1/4 coupling
from the hardware store. They're used for connecting two
pieces of threaded rod. (Amongst other things) ;-)
I think one was made by Larson Enterprises - think they made the original
Sof' Shoulder, too. Their web site doesn't show much, but it's under
construction. Besides the Sof' Shoulder, the one I'm remembering could be
held and clamped to a light stand using their Universal Clamp. Might do
well
Here you go: http://tinyurl.com/6r7ff
This guy has all kinds of cool stuff!
I'm sure he'll sell the flash/umbrella mount seperately.
All you need to mount on a tripod is a 1/4 coupling
from the hardware store. They're used for connecting two
pieces of threaded rod. (Amongst other things) ;-)
Hi!
A friend of mine is pondering which camera to buy. It very well could
be Pentax *istD as it is the camera he gave me as a gift!? And he is
kinda interested in finding a local to him PDMLer to take advantage of
:). Anyone who lives close to Billing MT area, please contact me
off-list.
Thanks.
Missed the original post.
Sam, that's a great funshot. Is it as angry as it looks, or just
tempted by eg. breadcrumbs...:-)
jostein
- Original Message -
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 5:25 PM
Subject: Re: PESO: DA-14 Fun
The camera supplies the 35mm equivalent focal length in a separate
field in the EXIF. For a shot made with a FA 50/1.4, it lists the
equivalent focal length as 75mm, so the crop factor should be exactly
1,5 rather than 1,55 as was mentioned early after the camera's
release.
Jostein
- Original
Ryan Lee wrote:
Hmm.. I didn't get the original message. I guess better late than never..
Howard never really believed his folks when they told him it wasn't
abnormal to have an early growth spurt..
Sam, what a fantastic pic! I love it! Do a series!
You could call them The attack of the
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: Arghhh My Tokina AT-X ProII 28-70mm sucks big time
(Lens test results) !!
It's only disadvantages is that it has noticeable distortion at
28mm
and that is flare prone? HAR!
The distortion may not be a problem in a lot of
On 14 Nov 2004 at 11:27, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
anyone know the dimensions of the active area of
the sensor? it would be simple to calculate.
I thought someone said it was 1.55 here a long
time ago when the camera came out.
If it uses the same sensor as the *ist D (which I believe has been
Bad, bad, Doug. Say three hail Pentax's for your sin of misleading the
list.
Doug Franklin wrote:
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 08:29:24 -0500, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Yesterday's mail included the new BH catalog. They are showing the
*istDS at $899. For the DA 16-45 they said you had to call for a
Mechanically they seem to be very different, however Boz's site has the
same optical diagram for both
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/lenses/primes/short-tele/F100f2.8-Macro.html
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/lenses/primes/short-tele/FA100f2.8-Macro.html
Peter Smekal wrote:
Are there any differences
That may be right but actual dimensions of the sensor active area
woud be a better reference.
jco
-Original Message-
From: Jostein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 2:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: *istDS $899 at BH
The camera supplies the 35mm
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: Arghhh My Tokina AT-X ProII 28-70mm sucks big time
(Lens test results) !!
Zooms do not inherently have to have noticeable distortion,
sure a lot of cheap ones do, but that does not make it
acceptable or minor problem IMHO.
In my quest to understand all this stuff...
Why do the .PEF file sizes vary so much?
I just took 30 exposures, the files vary from
12,244KB to 14,239KB.
I thought this might be tied to complexity or perhaps
brightness of the subject, but it doesn't seem to be.
Here are 3 results I obtained:
On 14 Nov 2004 at 14:18, Don Sanderson wrote:
In my quest to understand all this stuff...
Why do the .PEF file sizes vary so much?
I just took 30 exposures, the files vary from
12,244KB to 14,239KB.
They also contain an embedded jpg file which is supposedly used for histogram
Yes, he said the lens was more flare prone than a SMC lens.
One would have to assume under same conditions. Either
both using hoods or both not using hoods. If his
comparison was with hoods, then adding one didn't help
did it? If the comparison was without hoods my point
is yes, adding hoods may
I might give that one a try, I always stayed close to people feeding them.
Sam
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My god, he's about to be attacked by a duck!
I suppose that's one way to get close to them, annoy them until they
attack.
Sam Jost wrote:
For me the best use of the new DA-14
you are not that late.
I'll try to make more, it's fun! But that will take some time, for now my
succes rate for these is 1%.
nice comment, thanks!
Sam
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmm.. I didn't get the original message. I guess better late than never..
I'm not sure. Maybe it's believing in loss of soul by taking pictures and
tried to stop me?
But probably it wanted breadcrumbs from me as reward for the pictures and
was annoyed I didn't pay the fee.
The day they start coloring themselves I'll start to get really worried!!
Sam
From: Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Sam Jost [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The day they start coloring themselves I'll start to get really
worried!!
LOL. I'd love to see a pic of *that*.
Keep'em coming, Sam. It's great fun.
Jostein
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Hi Ann,
Congratulations. I'm going to go take a look.
If you want pictures to appear in a certain order, you have to upload
them in order. The last one to be uploaded will be the first one
displayed. I did that with my wakeboarding folder. Creating a
presentation will
- Original Message -
From: Don Sanderson
Subject: RAW file size variation? (Dumb Question #3485438345)
In my quest to understand all this stuff...
Why do the .PEF file sizes vary so much?
I just took 30 exposures, the files vary from
12,244KB to 14,239KB.
Bloated files. They have at
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: Arghhh My Tokina AT-X ProII 28-70mm sucks big time
(Lens test results) !!
Yes, he said the lens was more flare prone than a SMC lens.
One would have to assume under same conditions.
I wouldn't count on that.
William Robb
Thanks, I still wonder why a jpeg with no detail would
take more space than a detailed one.
Bloated files.hmmm
I wonder.is Pentax related to Micros***...NAH! ;-)
Don
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004
Certainly different Sam. A little more side view would help identify the
bird. Nice capture.\
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Sam Jost [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 4:08 AM
Subject: PESO: DA-14 Fun Picture
For me the best use of the
Hi Don.
I scanned the negative. I developed the roll at home,so i just had the neg's to
work with.
Epson 2450 using the Epson software,scanned at 1600 then resized to 150 for PS
save for
web plugin.
Is there something wrong.??
Dave
BTW thanks for the earlier comment.
Don asked:
Dave,
Great pose. Looks like a chapion.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 4:19 AM
Subject: Paw Another shot of Copper in BW
Got busy Friday night and developed a few rolls of Tmax 100 from Sept and
October. Some
well it would be pretty dumb for the original
poster to make a general statement that the tokina
lens was more flare prone than the SMC pentax without
assuming similar working condtions when making
the comparison. I give him more credit
than that. Are you trying to say he could be comparing SMC
Should have been - champion
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: Paw Another shot of Copper in BW
Great pose. Looks like a chapion.
Kenneth Waller
- Original
1 - 100 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
