On 2/12/04, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
Well, there's always the Pentax MX, various K-series cameras, the Leica ...
Of course, these cameras don't have modes perhaps that's why they're
so simple and intuitive.
Actually Shel there is an 'automatic' mode with the MX that you
On 2/12/04, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Another reason to move to Iceland (along with the fact that Bjork lives
there).
You're kidding me right? She's a nutter!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On 2/12/04, Illinois Bill, discombobulated, unleashed:
Thought I'd post a link to a couple of my recent winter pics that
I'm proud of. Don't know the difference between a PAW or a PESO as I
haven't been keeping up on that, so didn't know quite what to label the
subject.
Anyone knows where to get a 39mm to 42mm adapter? I have an old
Helios 50mm lens for a Zenit, that I would love to try on the ist D as
a portrait lens.
On ebay I only found 42mm to 39mm ones (the other way around, to use
an M42 lens on a Leica, for example)
Thanks,
j
--
Juan Buhler
I am in proof-reading mode:
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, John Francis wrote:
metering (either for the one-touch shutter setting above, or for the
exposure check that is activated when you engage the DOF preview) is
performed by briefly stopping the lens down to the taking aperture.
...is performed
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, William Robb wrote:
Shot within 20 seconds or so of each other..
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/PDMLtemp/
I have all sympathy for any kind of malfunctioning the camera
suffered. I would have blown a transistor or three in its place.
Not an expert in anything, but I
Hey Cotty,
That's Cool!!
Tnx
Patrick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I was looking for a decent method to convert GRB to mono, I came
across this a while back:
Author unknown -
--
Recently at ImagingUSA2003 in Las Vegas, Gary Rogers
Patience...
I have been looking for one for ages. I think one thing to do is to watch
smaller forums than ebay, especially those that are not auctions, and shops
that are not too experienced with used Pentax equipment. Ebay is too well
known and the price gets too high.
Pentax is not very
Nice shots, Bill. Thanksgiving was a pretty day here in Michigan as
well, although we didn't get quite as much snow as Illinois. I like the
little bits of color you found. Good work. By the way, PESO is always
a safe bet. There are a few curmudgeons here who don't want to say
anyone's photos,
1) the weather was a lot warmer back then, almost like it is today, so
Greenland and Vinland really were a lot greener, on the coasts anyway. then
came the Little Ice Age.
2) Iceland had been settled for a lot longer than Eric's time. Eric
emigrated to Iceland because he was thrown out of Norway
On Dec 3, 2004, at 12:29 AM, Francis Tang wrote:
Sadly, I
wouldn't be able to use the M35/2 (which I love on the MX, and would
make a nice standard lens for the istD/S), nor my M85/2
Why not? I use my M 35/2 on my *ist D quite frequently. I also use all
my K lenses. In fact, the majority of my
Good tip, Patrick. Thanks.
On Dec 3, 2004, at 12:58 AM, Patrick Genovese wrote:
Here's a little trick that i picked up i've found that in some
situations it works even better than the channel mixer. The concept is
similar to channel mixer except that you get more
1. Create a new adjustment
Hmmm I'm not sure if that's quite correct, but I'll defer to your
greater technical knowledge. However, look at how the green bushes are
rendered in the various conversions. In the LAB conversion they are very,
very dark to the point where shadow deatil is gone in some areas. That
seems
Hello,
I'm eager to use a Pentax K1000 that was presented to me, have recently
received a Porst 35mm lens - how decent are non-Pentax lenses that can be
mounted on Pentax cams? Is (are) there brand(s) that I should disregard?
Duchan
Darmstadt, Germany
Thanks Bruce, I trust your opinion.
I handled a *ist DS the other day and wondered.
The price was good, very enabling.
If an 8 megapixel version of the *ist D was next,
I'd probably be a buyer.
The shutter lag on the Sony is killing me...
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 18:45:32 -0800,
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Bob Sullivan wrote:
If an 8 megapixel version of the *ist D was next,
Why is megapixelage important? Do you print huge?
Kostas
No huge printing here, but...
1) I figure 8 megapixels is the next generation after 6, and will be improved.
2) I've shot Kodachrome whenever I could for the past 25+ years. I'm
spoiled by those nice 30x45 inch projected images. The 4 megapixel
Sony prints snapshots OK on my Epson 870 Photo
Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also have an Epson 2000P and have sold alot of prints from it.
For my money Epson is the one to beat for great home color printing.
I started out with an Epson 1270 that gave me years of service without
so much as a hiccup, even when left for extended
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: John Francis
I'd bet that for the majority of slides shot over the last decade
the prime use is to make a digital scanned image. A digital image
capture device removes two steps from the process (developing and
scanning), not to mention
John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Roberts mused:
Tim Sherburne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geez, that's old news. :)
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0110/01102401pentaxdslrnomore.asp
Would've been nice though.
Still would be with a different sensor...
:)
And lenses with
On 3 Dec 2004 at 12:41, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Bob Sullivan wrote:
If an 8 megapixel version of the *ist D was next,
Why is megapixelage important? Do you print huge?
More megapixelage means a little more flexibility to crop and better quality
large prints.
On 3 Dec 2004 at 3:56, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hmmm I'm not sure if that's quite correct, but I'll defer to your
greater technical knowledge. However, look at how the green bushes are
rendered in the various conversions. In the LAB conversion they are very,
very dark to the point where
Hi!
A friend of mine (and also my boss :) at work) has a pristine MZ-5n
body for sale. Everything works, flash is fine. The camera is in
perfect shape. I used this camera myself for one film - it was just
fine.
If you're interested please contact me off-list.
Thanks.
--
Boris
mailto:[EMAIL
FYI,
Heres some stuff of interest I have listed this week:
http://jcoconnell.com/JCO_AUCT.HTM
==
Item Title PayPal Price Bids Time Left
Asahi Pentax 85-210mm F4.5 SMC Takumar Zoom Lens M42
Superb Vintage
Hi Bob,
I think we have the same Sony model. There are a few things you can do to
reduce shutter lag, which, I agree, can be a PITA on these PS cameras.
You can put the camera into full manual mode, or aperture priority,
pre-focus or use manual focus, and partially depress the shutter release
Well, there y'go. I knew I could count on you for a way to measure the
differences. I never thought of doing that.
Rest assured, I won't be spending much time pondering the issue ... ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmmm I'm not sure if that's
Patrick Genovese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Look for a upscale model in the late spring. If they have not changed
their plans that is.
Was that mentioned offically anywhere ?
Officially? No.
;-)
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
I thought P-TTL worked with A lenses..
-
Thibouille
John Francis a écrit :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mused:
Quoting Francis Tang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
*gasp*!
Could this be true? Noone in Singapore can confirm whether M-series
lenses work okay with the *ist-DS (okay, I presume the DS is not so
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nihraguk/1883758/
Shot on Kodak BW400CN; contrast and levels etc manipulated in the
gimp, along with a bit o'cropping. Taken with a Pentax SMC 50/1.4,
Praktica MTL3.
This is my first PESO; let me know what you think?
John Francis wrote on 12/3/2004, 2:43 AM:
The definitive summary:
With A lenses (and the lens set to the A position) you obviously lose
autofocus (unless you're also using the AF 1.7X adapter). You're also
restricted to only the central AF sensor[1], and TTL (not P-TTL) flash.
I've shot some older lenses that were actually pretty good
even though they were cheapies. The Sears 80-200/4 is my
favorite example in that arena. Decent sharpness and contrast
for 1/2 the price of the A70-210/4. And with most my
color prints @ 4x6, I didn't really care.
WRT your lens, shoot
You may be right... I just ordered D with the 16-45 for around
$1350 after rebate. It will pay for itself after one year in film
and processing savings. I will also shoot more as I don't have to
conserve film.
And as long as you are happy giving up slides
I use slides only
Are there any other smelly chemicals used at this time ?
Formaldehyde is no longer used in film processing.
On 3/12/04, Chan Yong Wei, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nihraguk/1883758/
Shot on Kodak BW400CN; contrast and levels etc manipulated in the
gimp, along with a bit o'cropping. Taken with a Pentax SMC 50/1.4,
Praktica MTL3.
This is my first PESO; let me know what you
I expect you are right, but I also have heard that it is easier to
get good quality scans from negative film.
For me personally negatives are hell to scan as you can never know what were
the original colors, the best you can do is something
like autolevels, you can't even calibrate the scanner
On Dec 3, 2004, at 12:41 PM, Herb Chong wrote:
1) the weather was a lot warmer back then, almost like it is today, so
Greenland and Vinland really were a lot greener, on the coasts anyway.
then
came the Little Ice Age.
You know, I remember learning as a young lad, that Greenland, when it
was
Call me yong wei; chan is my surname.
And yeah... that dark blob in the corner :p you can make out the white
paws of the creature if you squint hard enough. I guess a macro lens
would work out much better; but I'm strangely fond of this image
because it seems to make the hamster a malevolent
I have a ME II winder. I was looking at it yesterday, and kind of broke
the battery compartment latch. I don't really want to sell it now, and
also, when I turned it on, it started going, and I couldn't get it to
stop. (I think a little catch got bumped in our house move a few weeks
ago.
Don Sanderson a écrit :
I just took a series of shots using an M type lens at f5.6 and TTL
flash on the D in Manual Mode at 1/150 second and ISO 400.
I was about 4.5ft (1.5M) from the subject.
Used the pop up flash, room was very dimly lit.
At EC settings from -2.5 to +2.5 all of the shots are
In the last number of my usual photo magazine (being the french
'Chasseur d'Images') they say the *ist-DS does NOT provide TTL-Master
wireless flash with the built-in popup flash which means you have to go
*ist-D if you need that.
Can anyone confirm this?
--
Thibouille
- Original Message -
From: David Zaninovic
Subject: Re: E6 with JOBO
I expect you are right, but I also have heard that it is easier to
get good quality scans from negative film.
I can compare the scan to the slide which is priceless, with
negatives you can't do
that.
Perhaps that is
- Original Message -
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis
Subject: Re: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?
Not an expert in anything, but I think you have too much space to
fill
with the flash. Did you get TTL-flash confirmation in the first one
for example?
I'm not an expert either, but I know that my
- Original Message -
From: David Zaninovic
Subject: Re: E6 with JOBO
Are there any other smelly chemicals used at this time ?
Nothing that is any worse than most household cleaning products, both
in odour and environmental threat.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Genovese
Subject: Re: Next Pentax DSLR?
Was that mentioned offically anywhere ?
Note, this may well be completely off base.
William Robb
Took a bunch of shots a couple weeks ago.
Quite a couple ones were overexposed. I'm unable to scan some to show
you how since I live without scanner for now (I dunno how I do but
that's not the point after all).
These shots were portrait-like, with faces covering most of the shot
and usually
- Original Message -
From: Thibs
Subject: Re: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?
Maybe the prob come from Pentax using only old CW with flash rather
than modern way of metering light?
Get real.
My 20 year old LX (centre weighted) is more accurate than my istD.
My Super program (centre
Thibs wrote on 03.12.04 16:19:
In the last number of my usual photo magazine (being the french
'Chasseur d'Images') they say the *ist-DS does NOT provide TTL-Master
wireless flash with the built-in popup flash which means you have to go
*ist-D if you need that.
Can anyone confirm this?
Illinois Bill a écrit :
Hey gang,
Thought I'd post a link to a couple of my recent winter pics that I'm
proud of. Don't know the difference between a PAW or a PESO as I
haven't been keeping up on that, so didn't know quite what to label the
subject. Comments/Criticism welcome.
Frantisek a écrit :
It wasn't odd at all.
Such lengths as 55 or 58mm gave perfect lifesize viewing with
viewfinders of the SLRs they were introduced along with.
That is one of the reasons.
Another might be that it is easier to design a superfast lens with
narrower field of view and longer clearing
I heayrd a much different story.
Eric the Red was forced to leave Iceland, apparently after killing a few
people. He found Greenland and established the first colony there about
982, naming it Greenland to make it sound more attractive. His son,
Lief Ericson, brought Christianity to Greenland
On 3/12/04, Chan Yong Wei, discombobulated, unleashed:
Call me yong wei; chan is my surname.
I beg your pardon Yong Wei. Call me anything you like ;-)
And yeah... that dark blob in the corner :p you can make out the white
paws of the creature if you squint hard enough. I guess a macro lens
I still think the chips in the ink cartidges suck!
If I accidently lift the lid to one of the cartridges, the ink is no more
useable. A normal repair will cost 100 USD including part up to a value of
16 USD. A repair that includes a new head (worth 170 USD) will cost 275 USD.
A new printer would
My AF400T is reasonably good on TTL with the *istD, although I have to say it
is a bit better on the LX.
Paul
- Original Message -
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis
Subject: Re: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?
Not an expert in anything, but I think you have too much space to
fill
I can compare the scan to the slide which is priceless, with
negatives you can't do
that.
Perhaps that is where my methods differ from most.
I look at the work I am outputting and decide if the colour is
acceptable or not.
I don't have so much experience in balancing colors and
I think I found the keyword my self: Chipsresetter! For app. 20 USD I can
buy a chipsrestter, which will reset my ink cartridge so the printer
believes it is full, not empty.
Annother tool is buying/changing the cartridge chip. This is even cheaper.
Anyone tried this?
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL
Hi Juan ...
Just so I'm clear: you want to adapt a 39mm LTM to a Pentax body. If so, I
have such an adapter. I've used it and iirc the Leica lens would only work
for closeups. You're welcome to try it though. Let me know.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sure; thanks a lot for giving me your frank input and feedback : )
Appreciate it.
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 15:41:09 +, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is absolutely true - thankfully we are all different and we all
approach different subjects in different ways and get differing results.
On 4/12/04, Chan Yong Wei, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sure; thanks a lot for giving me your frank input
Frank will give you his *own* input :-))
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
I am very unfamiliar with developing film and even more with what a
processor could offer.
What exactly does a processor do? What does it allow you not to do?
Is it much faster and/or safer? More (or less) economical?
I really have no clue...
--
Thibouille
My KX did (and still does) the same to me =) even if my SuperA has been
quite good in the very same way
-
Thibouille
Cotty a écrit :
On 2/12/04, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
Well, there's always the Pentax MX, various K-series cameras, the Leica ...
Of course,
Could someone let me know if the istD and or istDs software runs on Windows
98 second edition OS. The computer is an NEC 8100 powermate with USB
If so, I think I'll pick up an istD or maybe the DS. Blacks camera seems to
be offering a very good price for the ist d if you are an airmiles
Hi Bill.
Some nice ones there.The coloured frozen fruits and veggies dont over shadow(if
thats a
proper
phrase) the snow and coniferious trees.
I can relate to 8213 and 8231. The TOPDML are used to these winter shots.vbg
And as Cotty asked:Whats up with the last one:-)
Dave
For sale:
Tamron Adaptall II 24mm f/2.5 lens, 55mm filter size. Purchased from
KEH in EX+ condition in July.
Lens is extremely clean and clear. Dust specks visible in the photos
is only on the exterior.
This is a nicely made lens with very good build quality and very good
manual focus feel
price reduction. Camera only for 1699.00 CDN.
Comments...
Vic
Thats the best price i have seen in Ontario. McBain in Alberta has the same
price,but add
PST and
shipping.
Plus returns are easier to Black.LOL
How ya feeling?
Dave
The MX is nice, but I've recently become enchanted with the K body cameras.
A number of people have donated K-1000's and a couple of KM's to the 6th
Street Workshop, so I had a chance to try a few. They were new experiences
for me having gone directly from the Spotmatic series to the M's and LX.
Feeling pretty darn good, Thanks Dave. Good enough to seriously consider a
new camera anyway.
Thanks Vic
I had a coworker ask me the typical question yesterday:
What's a good digital camera to buy?
I asked Are you looking for a PS or an SLR?
Huh?
Do you want one with the lens built in or one with changeable lenses.
Changeable.
Do you already have a film camera, with changeable lenses?
Yes.
What
Thibs mused:
I thought P-TTL worked with A lenses..
Not according to the charts in the appendices to the manuals
(p144 in the *ist-D manual, p177 in the *ist-DS manual).
Apparently Pentax can't make up their mind, though: in the
charts in the main body of the manual (p93/p153) you can use
Wiiliam Robb wrote
Sorry Tom, I think the 4x5 will have to wait.
That's OK Bill. I think I'll have my hands busy with my new 3050mm lens
(Meade 12 LX200). It arrived yesterday.
I hadn't told Linda... since I didn't want her to suggest a more practical
use of money. :)
She called and told me I
Good to hear.
BTW i just called the Blacks closest to moi,Markville Mall,and they dont have
any instock.
When i asked
if he knew what store might,his computer showed no istD cameras in stock at
Blacks.
Pity, its a LOT closer than heading to Toronto.:-)
Hum.
Dave
Christian mused:
John Francis wrote on 12/3/2004, 2:43 AM:
The definitive summary:
With A lenses (and the lens set to the A position) you obviously lose
autofocus (unless you're also using the AF 1.7X adapter). You're also
restricted to only the central AF sensor[1],
Hi Gang ...
I just snagged a project that requires the use if a fast wide lens. I've
an 18/3,5 but something faster would be more better. The A20/2.8 has
always been of interest, and I can borrow one of those if that's what it
comes down to, but is there something faster for the Pentax that may
That does not surprise me. I'll just put the order in and wait
Can't imagine it would be too long. I've waited this long
Can anyone confirm for me if Windows 98 second edition will run software. I'm
thinking there is no problem but I would like to hear from anyone who is
running it off
John Francis a écrit :
Thibs mused:
I thought P-TTL worked with A lenses..
Not according to the charts in the appendices to the manuals
(p144 in the *ist-D manual, p177 in the *ist-DS manual).
Apparently Pentax can't make up their mind, though: in the
charts in the main body of the manual
It runs on mine, but the Raw convertor needs help. I'm having a hard time
locating software for RAW conversion that will run on Windows 98 SE.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Dec 3, 2004 1:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: istD-DS software and Windows 98
That
It runs on mine, but the Raw convertor needs help. I'm having a hard time
locating software for RAW conversion that will run on Windows 98 SE.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Dec 3, 2004 1:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: istD-DS software and Windows 98
That
It runs on mine, but the Raw convertor needs help. I'm having a hard time
locating software for RAW conversion that will run on Windows 98 SE.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Dec 3, 2004 1:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: istD-DS software and Windows 98
That
John Francis wrote on 12/3/2004, 1:07 PM:
Thibs mused:
I thought P-TTL worked with A lenses..
Not according to the charts in the appendices to the manuals
(p144 in the *ist-D manual, p177 in the *ist-DS manual).
Apparently Pentax can't make up their mind, though: in the
let's see you want it wide, fast, and small. Why not
add sharp and cheap too to your wish list while you are
at it?
I think you are chasing a dream, there isnt going to
be any lenses that wide that fast and if there were
they certainly wouldn't be small. The cost would be
astronomical if you
On 3/12/04, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
Did I read here about a Sigma 18/1.8? I have such an aversion to Sigmas,
Tokinas and Tamrons, but a lot of people here seem to use 'em, so maybe
it's time to at least check one out.
Sigma do a 20mm, 24mm, and 28mm all at f/1.8 in their EX
:-)
He did say they had a lot of Ds's in the computer.
Dave
That does not surprise me. I'll just put the
order
in and wait
Can't imagine it would be too long. I've waited this long
Can anyone confirm for me if Windows 98 second edition will run
On 3/12/04, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
I just snagged a project that requires the use if a fast wide lens. I've
an 18/3,5 but something faster would be more better. The A20/2.8 has
always been of interest, and I can borrow one of those if that's what it
comes down to, but is
LOL I love the way you say that =D
BTW I found an SMC Takumar 15 3.5 near mine.
Of course, price is high enough so I'm not even dreaming of it..
something like 350 euros if I recall...
---
Thibouille
Cotty a écrit :
On 3/12/04, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
Did I read
On 3/12/04, Thibs, discombobulated, unleashed:
BTW I found an SMC Takumar 15 3.5 near mine.
Of course, price is high enough so I'm not even dreaming of it..
something like 350 euros if I recall...
That's a good price!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 08:07:23 -0800, Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Juan ...
Just so I'm clear: you want to adapt a 39mm LTM to a Pentax body. If so, I
have such an adapter. I've used it and iirc the Leica lens would only work
for closeups. You're welcome to try it though. Let
A colleague of mine was a photojournalist in the '70s and '80s and
used Olympus OM's. When the 21mm f/2 Zuiko came out around 1980, it
became one of her favorite lenses for work. But that doesn't help, as
Pentax doesn't have anything similar.
I have Vivitar's 28mm f/1.9 in screwmount and
I'll have to check. But if anyone is planning a trip to Brussels, just
contact me ;)
Thibouille
Cotty a écrit :
On 3/12/04, Thibs, discombobulated, unleashed:
BTW I found an SMC Takumar 15 3.5 near mine.
Of course, price is high enough so I'm not even dreaming of it..
something
Mmmm if you read Ds, in english, properly, separating clearly the sound
'd' and 's', it means godess (one or two 'd'?) :D
I'd like to find such 'things' when opening my computer =D
-
Thibouille
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
:-)
He did say they had a lot of Ds's in the computer.
Sure; thanks a lot for giving me your frank input and feedback : )
Appreciate it.
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 15:41:09 +, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is absolutely true - thankfully we are all different and we all
approach different subjects in different ways and get differing results.
24mm/1.4 interesting, but a wider lens will be needed for this
project. I do like the idea of 24/1.4 though drool drool drool
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh yeah, if you don't visiting the Dark Side, there is this:
OK, Fast, Wide, Small, Sharp, and Cheap hmmm, sounds like an ex
girlfriend.
Look, I'm not an idiot, I know that some of the characteristics I'd like
may not be currently available, but if I don't ask I won't find out
anything. And, of course, such discussions often generate other ideas and
Ahh, a 20/1.8. That's worth looking into. Thanks! Didn't see it on my
list of Sigma lenses that I downloaded
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Did I read here about a Sigma 18/1.8? I have such an aversion to Sigmas,
Tokinas and Tamrons, but a lot of people here
Reduced.
1. KX body. A user. Self-time doesn't work. Shows wear. Not abused.
Shutter meter fine. I got it from a PDMLer.
$50 shipped in US.
2. Generic 75-150 M-class zoom. Made in Japan.
Clean and clear and functioning properly.
$35 shipped in US.
Extra overseas.
PayPal.
Christian mused:
John Francis wrote on 12/3/2004, 1:07 PM:
Thibs mused:
I thought P-TTL worked with A lenses..
Not according to the charts in the appendices to the manuals
(p144 in the *ist-D manual, p177 in the *ist-DS manual).
Apparently Pentax can't make up
OK, shoot me an address and I'll drop it into the mail for you. I'm not
planning to be in the city for a while. Let us know how well how well it
works for you. Sounds like a worthwhile experiment ;-))
BTW, how did the 18mm work out with the istD? Any pics you can post?
Shel
[Original
See my message to JCO about that lens. I first got turned on to it by
Eugene Richards who used it in a situation similar to the one I'll be in.
It may well be wide enough for the project, but it would be nice to see
what there may be for the Pentax first, and if there is anything wider, all
the
I have made some test shots (emailed to a list member) with my *ist D and
the AF500FTZ flash, using TTL-flash metering.
I have used P, P(Tv), P(Av) and M settings. And quite frankly, I can't seem
to get one faulty exposure no matter what I do, except perhaps from shots
where the flash is out of
Jens, I'm with you. I have not had one bad exposure (that wasn't my
fault; out of range, too small an aperture) with the ist D and flash.
--
Christian
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jens Bladt wrote on 12/3/2004, 2:33 PM:
I have made some test shots (emailed to a list member) with my *ist D and
the
Jostein wrote:
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So your summer is about three days long.?
LOL.
Three lng days...:-)
One of my dreams is to spend a week of holiday in December at Svalbard
(Spitsbergen)http://www.svalbard.com/infosvalbard.html to experience
Thank God, Christan!
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 3. december 2004 20:40
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: RE: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?
Jens, I'm with you. I have not had
1 - 100 of 222 matches
Mail list logo
