Hi Boris
maybe it has to do with your newest enablements ;-)
Tamron 90mm Macro + Digital body = mostly bug and flower close up beauty
shots
analog equipment before = a lot of different objects
I too start to think whether the choice of equipment can change photographic
behavior (vbg)
Also, be very sure to cock the leaf shutter each time. That is the
one weakness to that particular lens design (no indicator that the
shutter is cocked). I have several ruined shots because I wound the
film (cocked the focal plane shutter and then forgot to cock the leaf
shutter. Results in a
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Farr
But as I was installing Rawshooter, the dialogue told that
it supported DNG from supported cameras.
I don't think any current cameras can output DNG files.
--
Peter Williams
Hi Markus,
I think I agree with you that the OOF objects on the left can be a bit
disturbing. Cropping didn't cross my mind last night, but I'll look
into it. Thanks for the comment.
The working distance was about 6-7 centimeters. Just did a check with
a ruler at approximately the same
Hi Boris
as always there is really no defense needed, it's just a (n ugly) thought of
mine.
Maybe I see too much beauty here and wonder about the other sides of the
world not resulting in PAW/PESO/PUG
But, I better stop complaining now and yes, this morning at sunrise, I took
beauty shots of
Hi Boris,
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://oksne.net/paw/IMGP6258-sporehus.html
If I were seeing you in person, my friend, I would simply smile and
say
- can you go even smaller?
LOL. I can imagine the twinkle in your eye...:-)
Now, I actually like
Interestingly, my friends will tolerate it if I use a digital
projector to show pictures off a computer, but think that slides is a
drag.
Go figure...:-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And getting ahead of myself, for get slide projection, get with
On 30/4/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
On Apr 29, 2005, at 10:22 AM, mike wilson wrote:
... When are you next in the UK?
I'll be in the UK from May 25 to June 15. From June 2 to June 13 I'll
be on the Isle of Man, but I could arrange to meet between my arrival
and when
It may be cliche, but it's not a 'tired' one!
I like it a lot.
Very good balance in contrast, by the way. Even the deeper shadows have
some detail and the bokeh is excellent (meaning not noticeable...)
And if it has been processed as you indicate, even the processing is
not noticeable.
Nicely
Yep, that scratch disk is critical. I have 100 gig on a firewire drive
as scratch. That makes all the difference. I would guess your processor
is faster than mine. My box was top of the line three years ago or so,
so it's past middle age in computer years. But it doesn't slow me down
since I'm
Very nice. Excellent color, beautifully rendered highlights, great
bokeh, and plenty of DOF. Good work.
On May 2, 2005, at 12:51 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Seems first attempt failed...
http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?photo_id=185512
I only want to point out that at 800 ISO *istD is still
Yes, I understood that. However, when I've finalized a WIP, I save it as a
layered PSD file as well as a flattened final print. That way I can always
go back and make changes on an adjustment or duplicate layer should that be
necessary. So, the folder for the image includes sub folders for
Sorry to keep bombarding the list with this.
Final update available here:
http://www.cottysnaps.com/londonpdml2005.html
Attendees have been notified off list.
Best,
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Hi Alan ...
What's done to calibrate a lens? Where'd you send yours?
Some of the pics are quite nice. I like the color rendition as it appears
on my screen. Did you do much, if any, adjustments to the color in
preparation for posting to the web? How does the film do with skin tones?
Any
LOL, thanks David.
I've renamed the pages.
D
David Nelson wrote:
G'day Derby,
Nice shots, these guys really do like modelling (-:
In case you were wondering, it's a nymph of the Snake Mantid,
Kongobatha diademata. Sometimes used to see these guys flying down
corridors and clinging to windows at
I store/archive RAW and 8bit TIFF files after editting.
bye
Ramesh
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Why and How I switched to Canon (for those who care) long
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 15:36:13 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
On May 1, 2005, at 2:34 AM, Kevin Waterson wrote:
I have installed OSX 10.4 and all I can say is that I am dissapointed
in
so many ways. many of the basic features require you to purchase
upgrades
which run into more than I wanted to spend after laying out $199.00 for
the Tiger release.
Which
Hi all,
Has anyone done a head to head comparision for autofocus with the FA*85
and the 77mm LTD on an *istDS in low light?
Took the 85mm out tonight for some shots. Took shots at the same venue a
month ago, using the 77mm. I used the manual AF point select both times.
Most of my shots are in
The dialogue's meaning was that Rawshooter supported DNG files that are
converted from supported RAW camera formats.
regards,
Anthony Farr
-Original Message-
From: Peter Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 1 May 2005 6:24 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: OT
If needed, I used PS options. But, recently I read the fallowing which
suggestes RAW upscaling is better.
For the camera that capture square pixels, there is usually very little
difference b/w resizing in Camera RAW and upsizing in PS using Bicubic
For cameras that capture non-square
8-bit TIFF files are larger than PSD files unless you have enabled lossy
compression.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Ramesh Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2005 9:48 AM
Subject: Re: Why and How I switched to Canon (for those who care) long
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: RE: Why and How I switched to Canon (for those who care) long
What size files do you work with? 16bit, 35mm color scans are about
130mb,
add some layers and, bada-bing, you're working on 200+mb files.
The maximum file size that the
Tax day has come and gone in Canada. Yesterday midnight was the last moment
for penalty free tax fining.
I changed my calender this morning, the picture for May is the entrance to
the Our Lady of Perpetual Help Business School.
William Robb
Ahhh - British weather forecasts.
http://marguerite.ca/images/mastersingers.mp3
At 05:00 AM 01/05/2005 , you wrote:
High pressure from the west building over Britain towards the end of the
coming week - this is promising for those coming to London for the 7th.
More in the middle of the week.
It was a pleasure to met Juan. We had a great time
together, walking around Bs As, talking about life and
photography. It was also impressive to see Juan taking
pictures of people, he has an awesome technique, and
he's able to shoot people almost in their faces
without any problem, it's hard to
CS works fine in my Athlon XP 2500 (1.8 ghz) with
512mb ram memory. Windows XP eats a lot of memory to
work, but works very well imho.
I don't know about CS 2 (programs tend to become
elephants. Illustrator CS is a huge monster, capable
to dumb my PC)
Regards
Albano
--- Joseph Tainter [EMAIL
Nice shot. The bokeh is not very beautifull in this
lens (in my opinion, just based in this single shot).
Regards
Albano
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another from today's walkaround. Again, this was
shot wide open with
the Vivitar Series 1 70-210/3.5. Who says you can't
get
I do not shoot digital, 100% do to lack of funds. But I do like it for its
purposes. I also like film for its purpose. Anyone who shoots lots of unprinted
shots like you do, Paul, would be a fool not to use digital. OTOH when I shoot
with the Graphic I print about 1 for 2. At that rate even 4x5
This is my new version of flaneur, now in pure blog
format (you can leave comments)...
http://www.flaneur.albanogarcia.com.ar/index.php?paged=3
Regards,
Albano Garcia
Photography Graphic Design
http://www.albanogarcia.com.ar
http://www.flaneur.com.ar
I've been no longer shooting film for one year and a half now, and I truly
don't miss it.
However, I can well understand anyone who wants to keep shooting film and I
wish him/her all my best wishes.
As I wrote several times here and there, I don't think film is dead. I think
film can no longer
I don' t work with ANY mail archives in my daily activities. Sorry,
I'm not that Jeff. :-)
j
On Apr 30, 2005, at 12:31 PM, mike wilson wrote:
Are you the Jeff who runs the Mail Archive?
http://www.lookingglassphoto.com/
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Dario Bonazza
As I wrote several times here and there, I don't think film is dead. I
think
film can no longer manage the big business (only the blind could not
realize
that), but it can well stay alive for many years to
That's some good info Kevin. Thank you for the heads up!! I have
Tiger arriving this week.
j
Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.
- Albert Einstein
On May 1, 2005, at 2:34 AM, Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I love the limited lenses...they alone make me want to purchase a Pentax
dSLR just to be able to use them!
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2005 9:19 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Vancouver China Town (pics)
Hi
Cotty wrote:
On 30/4/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/channel/50/extra/new/display/3042997
Interesting !
Built 1860something, decommissioned in 1972. During that time, it was
the sole provider of pumped water for the town of Sunderland. One pump
Markus Maurer wrote:
Hi Herb
what Scan software do you use with multipass capability? Vuescan or does
that work with the supplied Nikon Software?
Did you do some testing on the number of passes and did you get the best
results with 4 times multipass or do you make some compromises because of
the
This argument should be retired.
Daguerrotype photographs can still be made, and there are some
practicioners of the art, but no one would say that daguerrotypes are a
living art form.
Godfrey
On May 1, 2005, at 9:42 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://www.lookingglassphoto.com/
Shel
[Original
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On May 1, 2005, at 10:18 AM, mike wilson wrote:
what Scan software do you use with multipass capability? Vuescan or does
that work with the supplied Nikon Software?
Did you do some testing on the number of passes and did you get the best
results with 4 times multipass or do
Thanks Godfrey for your report.
I understand that I do not miss a lot then.
Appreciated.
greetings
Markus
I've done a number of experiments with Vuescan multipass scanning using
the Minolta Scan Dual II. The improvements are often pretty subtle and
Godfrey
I hope your (softness) issues were resolved with the lens?
I like 4,5,6 the best (really nice!), than the 14.
Good light!
fra
PS Digital compares favorably with a good film image. No, in fact, a 6.1
PS megapixel digital image is better than almost any 35mm film image.
Paul, in fact? Who made you the judge of that? Please remember what
are the IMHO and YMMV abbrevs for.
With all other respect but sorry, this again ticks
At what speed will you rate them?
DGAJ I've got three rolls at 12500, five rolls at 6400, nine rolls at 3200,
DGAJ and one roll at 1600. (And two that don't have a speed written on them,
DGAJ so I have to look them up in my database by roll-ID...)
Ok, so I got to a computer this evening for a
Great! Congratulations. Tell us how it went afterwards.
Good light!
fra
Hi Mike
the same is true with the Canon 9900F here. Scangear has no option for
multipass.
I did some quick tests with Vuescan, but it did not recognize films strips
properly and
the scans are to bright in its default settings.
So, I really don't know what I miss from not being able to multipass
It's obviously an opinion Frantisek. Get over it.
On May 1, 2005, at 2:26 PM, Frantisek wrote:
PS Digital compares favorably with a good film image. No, in fact, a
6.1
PS megapixel digital image is better than almost any 35mm film image.
Paul, in fact? Who made you the judge of that? Please
Thanks, Paul
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice shot. The light coming from the window and the
curving wall make
it interesting.
On May 1, 2005, at 12:31 PM, Albano Garcia wrote:
This is my new version of flaneur, now in pure
blog
format (you can leave comments)...
I have gotten over it, but I would rather like to discuss how to better
one's technique in either digital or darkroom printing, but these
discussions often turn into such as this one... It's indeed apples and
oranges, in my opinion both can look good but are different. That's why my
gentle
Jostein wrote:
All comments appreciated.
http://oksne.net/paw/IMGP6258-sporehus.html
Thanks for looking, too.
Jostein
Are they in love? 8-) Why compensation - really, was that exposure or
flash? It needs just another 1/2 mm DOF, IMHO.
mike
On 1/5/05, Powell Hargrave, discombobulated, unleashed:
Ahhh - British weather forecasts.
http://marguerite.ca/images/mastersingers.mp3
LOL! (warning 2.8 Mb mp3)
Actually pretty decent today. 25 deg C and I'm just about to test the new
BBQ I built (the old one rusted to bits )
Cheers,
Rob Studdert wrote:
snip the pro-sumer digital capture to print process even at this stage is
equal to any average analogue process snip
I don't think I've seen anyone here disagree with this. What some
people take issue with are blanket statements that there is no
difference between analogue
While my flirtation with 8x10 has been fun,
It just takes too much of my time.
4x5 135 are enough. Especially since digital is coming.
So here's what's for sale:
1. Kodak 2D $200
VGC
Great bellows. A quality replacement.
Back is not awfully tight but works fine.
Nice shot. The light coming from the window and the curving wall make
it interesting.
On May 1, 2005, at 12:31 PM, Albano Garcia wrote:
This is my new version of flaneur, now in pure blog
format (you can leave comments)...
http://www.flaneur.albanogarcia.com.ar/index.php?paged=3
Regards,
Albano
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Apr 30, 2005, at 11:06 AM, mike wilson wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Apr 29, 2005, at 10:22 AM, mike wilson wrote:
... When are you next in the UK?
I'll be in the UK from May 25 to June 15. From June 2 to June 13 I'll
be on the Isle of Man, but I could arrange to
On May 1, 2005, at 10:18 AM, mike wilson wrote:
what Scan software do you use with multipass capability? Vuescan or
does
that work with the supplied Nikon Software?
Did you do some testing on the number of passes and did you get the
best
results with 4 times multipass or do you make some
Thanks Albano. The bokeh with this lens seems to be very predictable:
broad and soft without much distortion of the actual shapes. At this
distance the background doesn't go out of focus sufficiently to yield a
really nice bokeh. However, I've seen some good results from this lens
in that
Thanks to everyone who responded. I think I need to clarify the question
a bit:
Background question: Adobe lists only Intel processors as the hardware
that will run PS CS2, including the Pentium III and IV. I have an Athlon
1.33 Ghz, which is equivalent to the Pentium IV.
So far everyone
I'm still waiting to hear which 'basic features' in Tiger require a
purchase of additional upgrades. I worked with Tiger in pre-release for
three months and never needed any additional upgrades for any of its
basic features. I expect a copy Tiger to arrive later this week.
iPhoto ... well, the
I can understand your affinity for both film and the Speed Graphic.
I've been meaning to get mine out as well. I set up my enlarger for 4x5
and bought an expensive Schneider Compuron enlarging lens, but I still
haven't used it. Gotta do that.
Paul
On May 1, 2005, at 12:11 PM, Graywolf wrote:
I
--- Frantisek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope your (softness) issues were resolved with the lens?
The lens is now much sharper after calibration, except at near infinity where
the
very right edge is slightly blurry. However, it doesn't show up at close
distance.
I like 4,5,6 the best
I agree. And earlier today I pointed out how silly these discussions
have become. The message you cited was in response to a message from
Shel that was obviously meant to provoke. In any case, I am over it as
well.
Paul
On May 1, 2005, at 3:01 PM, Frantisek wrote:
I have gotten over it, but I
Hello,
It is obvious not to use the standard canned air blower. I have not
read much on using CO2 air, such as Leland or American Recorder. I
have used these products and they work fine. The gas contains no
residue and is pure. I have used CO2 gas to blow off a lens, as well
as a CCD. I can
On May 1, 2005, at 10:49 AM, mike wilson wrote:
I use slide film, mostly. I expected to see more difference,
especially on night shots where plenty of noise is generated.
Note that I said thin and dense rather than highlight and shadow
... that was intentional, to indicate behavior with either
I misspoke. Obviously Shel's original message was not meant to provoke.
I may have been provoked, but his point was legitimate. I'm staying out
of this before I get in any more trouble vbg.
Paul
On May 1, 2005, at 3:16 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I agree. And earlier today I pointed out how silly
On 4/27/05, D. Glenn Arthur Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've started developing film at home, using Sprint developer.
Oddly, I've been getting better results with 120 than with 35mm,
though I may have finally solved that (I just don't know why).
Sprint says this developer is the same as D76
On 1/5/05, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm staying out
of this before I get in any more trouble vbg.
Oh boy, you're way too late for that dude ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Thank you for your efforts.
rg
Adelheid v. K. wrote:
Hi folks,
The May PUG is available on my website AND on the komkon server.
http://www.kirschten.de/PUG/05may
and http://pug.komkon.org
Cheers
Adelheid
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://oksne.net/paw/IMGP6258-sporehus.html
Are they in love? 8-) Why compensation - really, was that exposure
or flash? It needs just another 1/2 mm DOF, IMHO.
LOL. All of a moss plant is haploid, except the spores, remember?
Hello again Pentax friends,
I continue to love my Pentax MF cameras; more, I'm a user and collector;
again, I'm perhaps also a bit paranoid collector..
I'm looking for the original boxes (with inner foam material) for my:
1 - Pentax-A 20mm. f.2,8 MF lens;
2 - Pentax-A 100mm.f.2,8 MACRO MF lens.
it can make a difference in 16-bit mode if your scanner's native bit-depth
is more than 8-bits. if not, then it isn't likely to make any difference.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2005 1:18 PM
Subject:
Re: Devere digital enlarger. There is a lab in New Mexico that has a Devere
digital. I sent a bw PS file to them for printing. The hi-lights were blown
out which may have been my fault. However, I had the same file printed at
Pictopia.com on a lightjet and the print was excellent. I still think
Sunday, May 1, 2005, 9:16:32 PM, Paul wrote:
PS I agree. And earlier today I pointed out how silly these discussions
PS have become. The message you cited was in response to a message from
PS Shel that was obviously meant to provoke. In any case, I am over it as
PS well.
PS Paul
:-) glad it
I would be delighted to have discussion of bettering techniques to
digital and darkroom printing, but rational discussion of this sort
seems impossible on PDML given the obstreperous nature of some
subscribers here.
I welcome those interested to discuss photography without attitude and
Mark Cassino wrote:
Nice shots, Derby - I've near seen a matid so small, and your
presentation of it is great. Very poetic.
- MCC
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mark Cassino Photography
Kalamazoo, MI
www.markcassino.com
Thanks Mark. Appreciate the comment, especially from a macro
Who was it who posted about a problem trying to clean his sensor with scuba
gear (a flow of compressed air from his scuba tank.)
I missed the posts with the conclusion of that situation (if any ever
appeared), but it sounded like he had a problem on his hands.
- MCC
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Markus Maurer wrote:
Hi Mike
the same is true with the Canon 9900F here. Scangear has no option for
multipass.
I did some quick tests with Vuescan, but it did not recognize films strips
properly and
the scans are to bright in its default settings.
So, I really don't know what I miss from not
Chad wrote:
Hello,
It is obvious not to use the standard canned air blower. I have not
read much on using CO2 air, such as Leland or American Recorder. I
have used these products and they work fine. The gas contains no
residue and is pure. I have used CO2 gas to blow off a lens, as well
as a
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On May 1, 2005, at 10:49 AM, mike wilson wrote:
I use slide film, mostly. I expected to see more difference,
especially on night shots where plenty of noise is generated.
Note that I said thin and dense rather than highlight and shadow ...
that was intentional, to
1 - Pentax-A 20mm. f.2,8 MF lens;
2 - Pentax-A 100mm.f.2,8 MACRO MF lens.
Two truly excellent lenses, Ezio. I hope you use them as well as just
collect them - g. (Your choice, of course...)
Fred
With my Canon Pro 90 IS and my Optio 230, I entered the world of digital.
Now, I am back to shooting film. I love slides. I love being able to see
them without having to activate a computer all the time.
I love using my Stereo Realist camera. After getting the E-6 film
processed, I mount the
You raise some good questions and I, personally, would not upgrade until the
question of Athlon support is clarified.
I just looked into Bibble and you are correct - I will not run on my
original Athlon, but it will not run on my Athlon XP system. Bibble says
that the processor must be SSE
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/channel/50/extra/new/display/3042978
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/channel/50/extra/new/display/3042997
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/channel/50/extra/new/display/3043008
Mike, I think the third one is the most interesting
A few years ago, a man offered to buy the box that my Nikon SP came in. If
the box had not be torn, I could have received $300 US for it.
Jim A.
From: Ezio Capoccetti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 22:47:24 +0200
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
One sold on e-bay recently, I think it went for $700+. I would have
loved to bid but it was way beyond my reach when I found it.
I think I may have found a bargain, but apparently the lettering on the front
of the lens has been blacked out! I'm guessing to prevent reflections/flare?!
John
Seeing as know your history, you may be able to find one at that
price :-) I think 3 times as much is more like it.
I never could resist a bargain :)
John
I just looked into Bibble and you are correct - I will not run on my
original Athlon, but it will not run on my Athlon XP system.
Oops - meant to say, regarding Bibble, that IT will not run on my original
Athlon, but WILL run on my Athlon XP system.
I, on the other hand, cannot run reliably on
Hi gang.
We're we all good:-)
http://www.caughtinmotion.com/worldcup/
Had a great time in Vegas and actually returned with money($60.00 but it's still
money.lol)
I put up a few pictures on the above link for your enjoyment. Top half are
standard
tourist
shots,bottom
Hi Dave,
Good job on the horses considering the limitations. I like the shot
with the Bally's sign in it as well. Nice composition.
Paul
On May 1, 2005, at 8:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi gang.
We're we all good:-)
http://www.caughtinmotion.com/worldcup/
Had a
No Paul, my message was not meant to provoke, but to open up discussion and
look at a side of the issue that certain people seem to ignore. There are
a few people on this list that have been seemingly totally dismissive of
film, almost to the point, or perhaps reaching and crossing the point, of
Limited lenses will work on any K-mount body.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Mark Pickett
I love the limited lenses...they alone make me want to purchase a Pentax
dSLR just to be able to use them!
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Howdy, gang! I finally aquired the necessary tools to process my own
film. I also bought a Canon 8400F scanner - mostly, because it comes
with carriers for 35mm slide and print film, and for 120 film.
Basically, I've the means to process, proof and print my own
photographs. It is, obviously, a
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless
Subject: PESO and enablement
Can you see any detail in the hair in the negative?
It looks like it is printed dark for the filter used, which should be used
to lighten skin tones in this sort of thing.
Other than that, I'd like either a bit of
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: Apples and Oranges (was Re: Why and How I switched to Canon
(for those who care) long)
No Paul, my message was not meant to provoke, but to open up discussion
and
look at a side of the issue that certain people seem to ignore.
Here's the new link:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3326184 I deleted the
original before I pulled my head out of my..
On 5/1/05, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless
Subject: PESO and enablement
Can you see any
On 4/30/05, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not bogus. Its a comparison of what is accessible to most
photographers working with a normal budget.
I'm going to slightly agree with Paul here. My reasons for choosing
to proof and print with a scanner and printer are simply
On 5/1/05, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I remember when we argued about what size of negative was the one true way.
I miss those days..
The bigger, the better.
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless
Subject: Re: PESO and enablement
Here's the new link:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3326184 I deleted the
original before I pulled my head out of my..
H.
Thats not really an improvement, is it...
So much for my
Try this
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/stuff/3326184.jpg
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless
Subject: Re: PESO and enablement
Here's the new link:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3326184 I deleted the
original before I pulled my head out of
Hi!
Well, I was off-list last night, as I was preparing for my little show
that's going up tomorrow. I'm also going to be away pretty much all
of tonight and the weekend as well (may pop in once everything's
finished and ready to put up).
The place is a cafe in Kingston called The Sleepless Goat.
Hi!
I just got back from the opening of the West Michigan Area Show at the
Kalamazoo Institute of Arts. This is an all media show, with works from
17 counties in west Michigan. I didn't win any prizes, but two of my
photos were accepted into the show this year. (I had one in last year.)
For
Hi!
Yes, but you must figure there might only have been 20,000 people on
earth, total, at that time!
That there were only 10,000 people left is not quite as much a disaster
as you might imagine, from one standpoint.
I suspect you may have lost something like 50% of the population then.
Had
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
