Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Rob Studdert wrote:
It's been a long time between PESOs for me but here are three pics from my
recent trip:
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/temp/IMGP4645.jpg (~109kB)
Oh dear!
The above image reminds me of one of the times I was visiting London with a
new Sony
Hi all,
I've just found a nice MZ50 for my niece
who wants to use it in London over the
next year or two. But we have no manual.
I remember vaguely that someone had
scanned the MZ50 manual and had it as a
word file? Or was it one of the other
'Z's? Also there was a source for such
things,
http://www.pentax-manuals.com/ has one (please note the password is
case sensitive)
On 10/10/05, Don Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I've just found a nice MZ50 for my niece
who wants to use it in London over the
next year or two. But we have no manual.
Pentax USA have a nice resource of scanned PDFs. Not the most readable, but they
are pretty complete:
http://www.pentaximaging.com/customer_care/manuals_literature
Quoting Don Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
I've just found a nice MZ50 for my niece
who wants to use it in London over
Don Williams wrote:
Hi all,
I've just found a nice MZ50 for my niece who wants to use it in London
over the next year or two. But we have no manual. I remember vaguely
that someone had scanned the MZ50 manual and had it as a word file? Or
was it one of the other 'Z's? Also there was a
http://www.pentaximaging.com/files/manual/ZX50.pdf
Is this what you are looking for?
--- Don Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I remember vaguely that someone had
scanned the MZ50 manual and had it as a
word file? Or was it one of the other
'Z's? Also there was a source for such
On Oct 11, 2005, at 4:09 AM, William Robb wrote:
One thing that was noted was that often, focus throw is oten longer
on manual focus lenses, and this can make them easier to focus than
an auto focus lens being focused manually.
Many of my AF lenses focus a lot closer than the MF lenses
On Oct 11, 2005, at 1:04 AM, mike wilson wrote:
I think we can agree that there should have been proper awareness
of which roads would definitely be closed for whatever reason, so
that the taxi should not have been there in the first place.
There was a high-profile case here a few years
Thanks everyone. I have it now and will
print it presently.
Don W
Pat Kong wrote:
http://www.pentaximaging.com/files/manual/ZX50.pdf
Is this what you are looking for?
--- Don Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I remember vaguely that someone had
scanned the MZ50 manual and had it as a
better manuals are found here:
http://www.pentax-manuals.com/manuals/af/afmanuals.htm
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Don Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Date: 10/11/2005 12:19:20 AM
Subject: Re: MZ50 Manual
Thanks everyone. I have it now and will
print it
Quoting Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
sigh
Gesundheit.
Asthma? :-)
Jostein
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
On 10/10/05, Doug Franklin, discombobulated, unleashed:
Well, I finally did it. Today Adorama confirmed that my *ist D and
16-45/4 are on the way. :-) I just couldn't wait to tell someone.
I've already downloaded the new firmware to install once it arrives.
Now if I can just stand the
I just generated a quick and dirty test pano from one of the 65 pano sequences
that I shot during my recent trip. I used thumb-nail files only so the image is
essentially as shot, I'll be able to produce a much improved image when I
finally get the time to use the RAW files.
The image covers
On 10/10/05, Doug Franklin, discombobulated, unleashed:
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 23:33:27 -0400, Fred wrote:
If you must have * glass you have only one choice the A*135 f1.8. Best
buy one before Canon shooters mutilate them all to use on their infernal
machines.
P.J., are you kidding, or
On 10/10/05, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
It's a dig at Cotty, he's already done it to an A 85 f1.4...
I'm still not talking to you.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 10/10/05, keith_w, discombobulated, unleashed:
At a couple of points (I found out later) I had left the record button
locked
down, still taking photos while hanging off my neck!
While walking along the sidewalk outside Westminster Abby, while
visiting the
gents, etc..
Don't laugh - I can
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Kostas Kavoussanakis
Subject: Re: Pictures from a vacation IX
Full frame shot off the Optio.
This is our small dog.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/vacation/IMGP0612.html
Nice shot. Veiling flare?
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, William Robb wrote:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/vacation/IMGP9303.html
Shot with the F300/4.5, f/32 for 1/125 second at ISO 200.
Nice, despite the high-contrast. Why f32? Hoping for a low-enough
speed to get the water movement? Or DOF?
Kostas
There's a lovely soft, silvery, sheen to this picture, and the composition
works beautifully.
I have just looked up Picture Window Pro. The price seems very
reasonable. Do you find it can meet most of your image editing
requirements, or do you still need Photoshop?
John
On Mon, 10
Thibouille wrote:
Buy an MZ-M and exchange the screens.
Simple (and cheap) as that.
It has been suggested earlier on this list that the split image/micro
prism might cause problems for the spot metering, though - as they sort
of change the brightness of the centre of the screen.
There's truly very little info about interchangeable screens for the
D-series, and sometimes it is wrong (as the Pentax press release
mis-described an optional screen as being split-image).
If you replace the standard screen (on the D/DS) with the divided matte or
scale matte type, can you
A nice grab. Of course it would be an excellent grab if you had caught
the nose of that first plane. I'd crop it into a vertical with the
planes crossing on the diagonal.
Paul
On Oct 11, 2005, at 12:29 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
At the Norcal PDML outing, in the afternoon part of the group went
Hi Marnie
I like the not frank and cable car shot best.
Most photos seem to have a red/magenta cast and the shots from the PDML may
be good for the memory only;-)
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005
I can find very little info about interchangeable screens for the
D-series, and sometimes it is wrong (as the Pentax press release
mis-described an optional screen as being split-image).
My doubt is: If you replace the standard screen (on the D/DS) with the
divided matte or scale matte type, can
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, keith_w wrote:
That must be a different formula from the S-M-C Takumar 105mm f/2.8.
Doug Brewer calls the S-M-C version a jewel and it has great bokeh.
This lens has great resolution at f/5.6 and 8.0.
I wouldn't give mine up...
Perhaps there was something wrong with your
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Tom Reese wrote:
Has anyone else noticed that KEH now has:
(5) FA 50 2.8 macro lenses
(4) F 85 2.8 soft lenses
(2) FA 85 2.8 soft lenses
(2) FA 100 2.8 macro lenses
(9) FA 28-105 zoom lenses
I'm wondering where all these used lenses are coming from and why they're
all
I agree with Paul. A vertical crop would probably make it an excellent
composition. The contrast with the sky and the details, gives this shot
great potential.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C.
Hi Paul
I hope you don't mind that I downloaded the free actions too ;-)
very good stuff, thanks for the link!
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: Paul Sorenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 6:03 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT lens
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 09:42:28 +0100, Cotty wrote:
Isn't that what Cotty did?
However, the K15 f/3.5 and the A*85 f/1.4 that I have
adapted to EOS work very well.
Ah, I knew it was one (or two) of the classics.
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 18:33:23 +1000, Rob Studdert wrote:
I just generated a quick and dirty test pano from one of the
65 pano sequences that I shot during my recent trip.
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/temp/test.jpg (~230kB)
Beautiful shot, Rob. I especially like the clouds and the
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 09:26:28 +0100, Cotty wrote:
On 10/10/05, Doug Franklin, discombobulated, unleashed:
Well, I finally did it. Today Adorama confirmed that my *ist D and
16-45/4 are on the way. :-) [...]
STOP PRESS: It has been reported that a snowball has just melted in
downtown
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 21:29:25 -0700, Bruce Dayton wrote:
At the Norcal PDML outing, in the afternoon part of the group went
down to the waterfront to watch the Blue Angels.
Pentax *istD, Sigma 100-300/4 EX, Sigma 1.4X EX, handheld
ISO 400, 1/750 sec @ f/5.6 - 300mm focal length + converter
Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pentax *istD, Sigma 100-300/4 EX, Sigma 1.4X EX, handheld
ISO 400, 1/750 sec @ f/5.6 - 300mm focal length + converter
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/norcalpdml_sf_140.htm
Great shot Bruce! I like the unconventional composition, too: There have
been so many
I've bought from KEH for many years... before they had a web site.
While there are multiple copies of some odd ducks available today, I
would say their inventory of Pentax lens is at a historic low. Try
finding a FA lens or A lens.
Regards, Bob S.
On 10/11/05, Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL
Hi David,
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 21:00:09 -0700, David Oswald wrote:
I have the FA135 f/2.8(IF), and love it. It's hard to imagine
getting such a telephoto reach and f/2.8 speed (as experienced
with the 135 on a DSLR) in such a small package. [...]
Good luck, I think you'll enjoy the 135.
- Original Message -
From: Dario Bonazza
Subject: Interchangeable screens for the D/DS/DL: a Pentax secret?
If you replace the standard screen (on the D/DS) with the divided matte or
scale matte type, can you still see the superimposed AF points? I expect
so,
but can anyone
- Original Message -
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis
Subject: Re: Pictures from a vacation IX
That's what I was getting at; is your Optio lens with SMC, or one of
the others?
It's an SMC.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis
Subject: Re: Pictures from a Vacation X
Nice, despite the high-contrast. Why f32? Hoping for a low-enough speed to
get the water movement? Or DOF?
I'm not quite sure what i was trying, other than to secure enough DOF to
ensure
I'm watching medium format Pentax lenses for a couple of months.
And i think K-mount availability is not so good.
With few exceptions.
Haven't seen any soft lens yet... is it worth to try?
Gasha
Bob Sullivan wrote:
I've bought from KEH for many years... before they had a web site.
While
Enjoy!!
-P
Markus Maurer wrote:
Hi Paul
I hope you don't mind that I downloaded the free actions too ;-)
very good stuff, thanks for the link!
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: Paul Sorenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 6:03 AM
To:
On 10/8/05, Adelheid v. K. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
Jostein is right now putting an awful lot of work into the new PUG.
After this thread about PUG i wonder whether this is still wanted.
Please answer the simple question:
PUG continue yes/no ?
Thanks a million in advance.
i
In a message dated 10/10/2005 10:15:29 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Whatizit?
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/whatizit.htm
next button to... or click the link below...
Ride 'em Cowboy
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/cowboy.htm
It probably
In a message dated 10/11/2005 3:33:53 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Marnie
I like the not frank and cable car shot best.
Most photos seem to have a red/magenta cast and the shots from the PDML may
be good for the memory only;-)
greetings
Markus
In a message dated 10/11/2005 6:13:15 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i can't help but notice that most who've posted to say yes rarely
post to pug. the monthly numbers have generally dwindled over the
past few years.
if we expect volunteers to continue their hard work, we
Tom Reese wrote:
Has anyone else noticed that KEH now has:
(5) FA 50 2.8 macro lenses
(4) F 85 2.8 soft lenses
(2) FA 85 2.8 soft lenses
(2) FA 100 2.8 macro lenses
(9) FA 28-105 zoom lenses
I'm wondering where all these used lenses are coming from and why they're
all appearing on the market
In a message dated 10/9/2005 8:54:39 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here in the 12th mile, the eventual winner (#3) keeps an eye on the field.
http://members.aol.com/rfsindg/marathon.jpg
Regards, Bob S.
=
Nice shot. At first I wanted the official in focus,
In a message dated 10/8/2005 2:40:07 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 08 Oct 2005 01:28:08 +0100, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Check out http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
you guys know the drill
Yea, nay and or comments
what
On 11/10/05, Doug Franklin, discombobulated, unleashed:
;-) Actually, I've wanted one for quite some time, but haven't had the
ready capital to buy one. At the Petit le Mans weekend before last I
discovered that the guy who's been doing the photography for the local
SCCA region was moving and
On 10/7/05, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ahhh But you guys don't understand. Frank will not be able to
collect anything because he was operating his vechicle in an illegal
manner; that is without a bell, nor a rear brake.
wrong! at most, if they were contributing factors to the
On 11/10/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Let me guess, Frank, the woman was pretty? The cop was trying to cut her
a break at your expense?
no, she was around 75 and quite distraught
Blimey she wasn't hanging around then ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
I see the topic for October is Useless. Believe I will be able to submit
on that topic.
Think I have a useless photo or two ;-)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever
All three of the screens are matte screens, what differs are the
scribed markings:
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/ds-focus-screen.jpg
I know the same screens fit the D/DS/DS2 ... don't know why they
wouldn't fit the DL other than that the focus indication markings
might not be aligned.
Hi there,
I've made a small quiz from our Southwestern trip to USA:
http://www.misenet.sk/SF/
These pictures were taken during our journey through the West, but where
exactly? It's up to you... :-)
Comments, as well as guesses are welcome, of course.
All in all, it was wonderful experience
Ha! You did!
Cotty wrote:
On 10/10/05, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
It's a dig at Cotty, he's already done it to an A 85 f1.4...
I'm still not talking to you.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Thanks Godfrey.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 4:19 PM
Subject: Re: Interchangeable screens for the D/DS/DL: a Pentax secret?
All three of the screens are matte screens, what
Thanks Bill.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: Interchangeable screens for the D/DS/DL: a Pentax secret?
- Original Message -
From: Dario Bonazza
Subject:
Yes, you can still see the AF points.
Dario Bonazza wrote:
There's truly very little info about interchangeable screens for the
D-series, and sometimes it is wrong (as the Pentax press release
mis-described an optional screen as being split-image).
If you replace the standard screen (on the
No it doesn't, the K lenses were standardized on 52mm filter threads,
and each lens had a minimum aperture one stop smaller than their
SMC-Takumar predecessors. This is true of lenses that were otherwise
optically identical. If the proceeding Takumar had a filter ring larger
than 49mm then
If you go back and look at some of the earlier Pugs there are quite a
number of them with very few entries by recent measure.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 10/11/2005 6:13:15 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i can't help but notice that most who've posted to
That's very impressive.
Rob Studdert wrote:
I just generated a quick and dirty test pano from one of the 65 pano sequences
that I shot during my recent trip. I used thumb-nail files only so the image is
essentially as shot, I'll be able to produce a much improved image when I
finally get the
In a message dated 10/11/2005 6:51:28 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
no, she was around 75 and quite distraught
-frank
===
Probably afraid of losing her license. Though, actually, maybe she shouldn't
be driving anymore. It happens.
Marnie aka Doe
Think I'll skip the quiz ;-)
After seeing Bruce's Red Rocks/sand pictures here I would never dare to
submit anything similar. You did, and you did ok.
In fact, you did more than ok. Thanks for taking the man down from the
pedestal ;-)
Still hate him, but now I hate him a bit less.
In other
Happy you enjoyed America the Beautiful.
I don't expect to pass the test but:
# 65: Yosemite
130: Mono Lk
216: Zion
235: Bryce
295: Natural Bridges
312: Glen Canyon
362: Mesa Verde
388: ?
582: San Francisco
712:
Look forward to other images mentioned.
Jack
--- Peter
In a message dated 10/11/2005 7:27:40 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've made a small quiz from our Southwestern trip to USA:
http://www.misenet.sk/SF/
Cheers,
Bedo.
===
Zion, not sure, not sure, Bryce, Bryce, not sure (although I've seen that
just don't
Nicely captured stitched.
My only nit is the proximity of the shoreline the the bottom center edge of the
inage.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Oct 11, 2005 4:33 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PESO A pic from my trip
I just
Hi!
I just generated a quick and dirty test pano from one of the
65 pano sequences that I shot during my recent trip.
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/temp/test.jpg (~230kB)
Beautiful shot, Rob. I especially like the clouds and the flow from
darker to lighter going from left to
Beautiful. I would love to see a huge print of your final version. It should be
spectacular. Nice work.
Paul
That's very impressive.
Rob Studdert wrote:
I just generated a quick and dirty test pano from one of the 65 pano
sequences
that I shot during my recent trip. I used thumb-nail
Very nice indeed, Rob!
However, I find the horizon line a bit curved. I have discovered, that this
is often the case, when using Photovista 3.5 (Iseemedia) or similar
software, creating panoramaa automaticly.
I recently started using Pano Tool Assembler (PTAssembler) which seem to get
around this
Aamazing
Make a big print, if you can afford it.
Gasha
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Beautiful. I would love to see a huge print of your final version. It should be
spectacular. Nice work.
Paul
That's very impressive.
Rob Studdert wrote:
I just generated a quick and dirty test
Hello John,
Thanks for the comments.
With full 16 bit support, full color mangement and sophisticated
masking, so far I never use Photoshop. Not to say that PS is not a
great product, but PictureWindow Pro at about $90 is one heck of a buy
and a much better product than the other competitors of
frank theriault wrote:
On 10/7/05, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let me guess, Frank, the woman was pretty? The cop was trying to cut her
a break at your expense?
no, she was around 75 and quite distraught
She was playing the grandma card.
I don't think its a coincidence. Fixed focal length auto focus lens have been
on KEH Most Wanted list for about a year.
Derek
Hi!
KEH sends buyers out all over the country, picking up inventory from camera
stores, distributors, camera fairs and shows, and the like in bulk
Keep some of it in the upstairs loo also... BTW, what were you gooing to do
with it?
Tom C.
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Digital Primer?
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 23:20:59 +0100
On 9/10/05, Bob W,
On 10/11/05, E.R.N. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
She was playing the grandma card.
LOL
seriously, she was quite upset, and seemed geniunely concerned for my
welfare and quite contrite.
i feel bad that i'll have to gi after her insurance company g
-f
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.
*ist D FA 100 f/2.8 Macro
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3795076
Comments appreciated.
Tom C.
For me, it looks upside down. The drop would normally form on the
underside hanging down - so when I view it, it throws me just a bit.
The histogram looks compressed, so I tried adjusting it and found a
bit better contrast from that.
It is nice to look at in spite of what I have said. You got
If I had to choose a winner among the open gallery entries and even all of
the October PUG , it would have been the cook:
The cook - by J.Schnapper
-
Extremely pleasant and funny for me to watch and I think it would have
fitted the Kitsch theme too.
I looks a bit bright
Glad you had a good trip, Peter.
Clearly you were in southern Utah and adjacent areas.
Joe
Hi Rob
this will be a wonderful panorama shot once tweaked a bit.
The ship is a bit dark now in this QD sample for me.
I'm sure you have seen some very beautiful places during your journey, just
keep on posting photos please :-)
greetings
Markus
The image covers 316 x 60 degrees and was composed
Hi Cotty
and did any of them record something worthy or funny ever?
down, still taking photos while hanging off my neck!
While walking along the sidewalk outside Westminster Abby, while
visiting the
gents, etc..
Don't laugh - I can point out several occasions where this has happened
to
Cotty wrote:
On 10/10/05, keith_w, discombobulated, unleashed:
At a couple of points (I found out later) I had left the record button
locked down, still taking photos while hanging off my neck!
While walking along the sidewalk outside Westminster Abby, while
visiting the gents, etc..
Nice, Tom C.,
Is that a water bubble or an air bubble?
Petal and stamen positions form an ideal compositional arrangement.
DOF is allowed self determination in most such instances.
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*ist D FA 100 f/2.8 Macro
It's a water droplet. Fun to find it there. From this summer in Alaska.
Thanks.
Tom C.
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Fire and Water
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 10:20:06 -0700 (PDT)
Nice, Tom C.,
Is that a
Glad to hear that, Wrong!, Frank.
Here (US) they would certainly try to play that game, apparently they
are more enlightened in Canada.
However, just think what the cop would have done if you had been riding
the track bike grin.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert
Nice composition choice of focus point
I wished it had a more vivid color pallette.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO - Fire and Water
*ist D FA 100 f/2.8 Macro
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3795076
Comments appreciated.
Looks like you had a good trip, some nice views in your pictures.
Sorry we didn't get a chance to meet up ... My time just got fuller
and fuller to the breaking point while you were in the area.
Godfrey
On Oct 11, 2005, at 7:25 AM, Peter Lacus wrote:
Hi there,
I've made a small quiz
300 US$ is a bit too much for this lens, isn't it?
Anybody got any comments on this lens?
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
Contributory negligence is used in many states in the US. I don't want to
say all, although that may be the case, but certainly many, if not most.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: graywolf
Glad to hear that, Wrong!, Frank.
Here (US) they would certainly try to play that game, apparently
On Oct 10, 2005, at 2:55 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/MEET2/index.html
I particularly like Not Frank too. A simple, clean composition,
nice lines, etc.
Good to see the photos... I'm going to pull a summary of mine up into
a web gallery today if I get
In a message dated 10/11/2005 10:49:39 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Oct 10, 2005, at 2:55 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/MEET2/index.html
I particularly like Not Frank too. A simple, clean composition,
nice lines, etc.
Good to see the
Thanks. The color pallette is what the color pallette is, n'est pas? Part
of the diffusion, of course, is because of the out of focus areas
themselves. I did up the saturation a little in the RAW converter.
Tom C.
From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
I think it's too much. You can usually find the M 50/4 macro for less than a
hundred dollars. To my mind, a wide aperture is not necessary on a macro. It
makes focusing a bit easier, but with the limited DOF you get when shooting
macro, wide open is rarely an option.
Paul
300 US$ is a bit
On 10/11/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Contributory negligence is used in many states in the US. I don't want to
say all, although that may be the case, but certainly many, if not most.
it surely is. at common law, there was no contributory negligence;
it's purely a creature
There is a very slight grade at the finish. The winner said that he
looked at the two other guys with him and decided he felt better than
they did so he turned on his sprint. He picked up some 5 seconds.
The bunch I've shown is in the 12th mile of a 26 mile race. Two in
the group have PACER
I tried to get the prize down, in vain.
The seller told me had second thoughts about it, and now is selling it at
ebay. I'm following the auction, but will not bid (havent got paypal).
Doesn't really matter, in fact my wallet gave me a pleased purring sound.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain
On 10/8/05, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Okay, I guess I love my kids more...
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3777084size=lg
vbg
Frank, this is severely off topic ;-).
IT WAS TAKEN WITH A PENTAX!!!
so it's most certainly on-topic LOL
-frank
--
This might turn out to be interesting. Now he is telling me I can bid, and
pay him another way. First time I will be following a ebay auction, quite
exiting.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C.
It's National Coming Out Day today.
I thought this photo celebrated the occasion appropriately. Taken
during San Francisco Gay Pride 2005:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/40q.htm
Comments, critique, and especially flames, all appreciated.
enjoy
Godfrey
300 US$ is a bit too much for this lens, isn't it?
Anybody got any comments on this lens?
I think that $300 USD is a bit steep, perhaps unless it is brand new.
However, the F 50/2.8 Macro (or the optically identical FA version) is
bitingly sharp - it's really an incredibly sharp lens.
Wasn't Leica jelious
frank theriault wrote:
On 10/8/05, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Okay, I guess I love my kids more...
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3777084size=lg
vbg
Frank, this is severely off topic ;-).
IT WAS TAKEN WITH A
1 - 100 of 194 matches
Mail list logo
