http://www.flickr.com/photos/mawz/66670322/
*istD, Tamron 28-75 f2.8 XR Di
-Adam
Ansco Super Hypan. Unfortunately it hasn't been available for quite
awhile, so maybe that should be "What was my favorite film".
These days it is what ever I can get cheapest in the 100 speed range.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
There has been some discussion of the Zenitar 16mm fisheye so I thought I
would put up a few shots take with the ZX-5n.
It is much easier to use this lens on the DS with the 1.5 crop. It is
really wide and bendy on full frame!
http://members.shaw.ca/hargravep/Image9.htm
Powell
On 11/25/05, John Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've not posted much in a while so I thought I would put this one out
> there. My FA 50 f1.4 has been seriously underutilized and the sun
> hasn't been out in a while here in the Pacific Northwest. But I
> happened to catch another snap of my g
I usually expose my Tri-X at 200-250 or so. Gives me nice dense
negatives with plenty of shadow detail, and I have yet to have it
block up on highlights. I develop it in D76 1:1, and I get nice smooth
midtones. It's probably my favorite "people" film, though, depending
on the situation, I'll usuall
Here are some of the pictures:
http://www.outofrange.net/blogarchive/archives/003569.html
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 25 November 2005 16:32
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Bailey's new book
>
> Hi,
>
> I had a quick l
Hi,
I had a quick look through Bailey's new book today. Interesting stuff, good
portraits.
Here's an interview with him, featuring a shoot with Jane Bown:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/arts/features/story/0,11710,1646031,00.html
Regards,
Bob
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005, frank theriault wrote:
but sometimes in a pinch, it's all I have). I haven't tried it, but
I've heard it's quite nice exposed at 320 (apparently HCB did that
quite often) or 200, as well.
(in both cases) With or without pulling? 320 but processed as 400 is
just 1/3 overe
Hey, Bill - you get an "A" on your test !
welcome back,
annsan
Glen wrote:
>
> At 01:35 AM 11/25/2005, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>
> > >
> > > FWIW, your picture wouldn't qualify as a nature print in our club and
> > interclub competitions.
> >
> >And even with digital, a nature stock agency won't
> >take manipulated stuff... at least mine won't.
>
> If all that
John,
I, very much, agree with your chosen composition.
Beautiful image!
Put it away with other treasures.
Jack
--- John Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've not posted much in a while so I thought I would put this one out
>
> there. My FA 50 f1.4 has been seriously underutilized and the s
On 11/24/05, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Amen!
>
>
>
> We're past due for a new poll, aren't' we? So what's your favorite
> film, and why? Give us details, such as which films you use for what
> subjects. Or do you use certain films with certain lenses or cameras?
> Etc.
Okay,
On 11/24/05, Tom Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I tend to ignore digital threads. There doesn't seem to be much else on this
list lately.
Amen!
We're past due for a new poll, aren't' we? So what's your favorite
film, and why?
Hmmm... I think my favourite colour film right now
Thanks for all the comments!
It is no coincidence that Tolkein lived and wrote in
Oxfordshire!
I have not ventured yet into the arcane world of
"curves" in PE2, but I may do so for this pic! Powell
got much better results with the "eyedropper" on the
jpg than I got using it on the tif, which is
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Shell"
Subject: Re: Shoot now, focus later
Wanna buy mine and find out??? ;-)
Check back with me after I have a darkroom again
William Robb
On Nov 25, 2005, at 10:24 AM, William Robb wrote:
>I think it is called "Minute Mask" or something like that.
It was much easier to use than Pan Masking Film.
I always wondered how well those things worked
Wanna buy mine and find out??? ;-)
Bob
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Shell"
Subject: Re: Shoot now, focus later
>I think it is called "Minute Mask" or something like that.
It was much easier to use than Pan Masking Film.
I always wondered how well those things worked
William Robb
Op Fri, 25 Nov 2005 15:51:35 +0100 schreef Don Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
That would make the barrels about the same diameter as the outside of
the mount?
Aproximately, yes.
What is the diameter of the threads on the tubes. Outside diameter
will do. It it 42 mm?
No, far larger, abou
We've all been there:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/manchester/4468884.stm
Bob
On Nov 25, 2005, at 9:54 AM, William Robb wrote:
Ever do an unsharp mask in the darkroom? Me neither, but I've seen
prints done that way.
Actually, I have.
Sadly, Kodak deleted Pan Masking Film, and I don't know if there is
something suitable out there as a replacement.
I still have this
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts"
Subject: Re: Shoot now, focus later
Ever do an unsharp mask in the darkroom? Me neither, but I've seen
prints done that way.
Actually, I have.
Sadly, Kodak deleted Pan Masking Film, and I don't know if there is
something suitable out ther
frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 11/24/05, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Amen!
>>
>> We're past due for a new poll, aren't' we? So what's your favorite
>> film, and why?
>
>Roman Holiday. Because Audrey Hepburn was gorgeous, and there was
>real chemistry between
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty"
Subject: Re: New Poll -- Favorite film (was -- Shoot now, focus later)
My favourite film is a roll of FP4 that's sitting (exposed) in the
bottom of my desk drawer. It's been there for some years and I have
absolutely no idea what's on it. Since I
That would make the barrels about the
same diameter as the outside of the mount?
Don
Lucas Rijnders wrote:
Op Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:32:13 +0100 schreef Don Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
What is the diameter of the threads on the tubes. Outside diameter
will do. It it 42 mm?
No, far larger,
You're a cruel man...
Cotty wrote:
On 24/11/05, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
We're past due for a new poll, aren't' we? So what's your favorite
film, and why? Give us details, such as which films you use for what
subjects. Or do you use certain films with certain lenses o
"E.R.N. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>John Taylor wrote:
>
>> http://i.pbase.com/o4/87/63987/1/52723043.DariusRiver.jpg
>>
>OH!
>Oh WOW!
>The lighting ... The expression ... The composition ... The selective
>focus
>Oh, man, this is perfect!
I don't know how I missed the original post b
John Taylor wrote:
I've not posted much in a while so I thought I would put this one out
there. My FA 50 f1.4 has been seriously underutilized and the sun
hasn't been out in a while here in the Pacific Northwest. But I
happened to catch another snap of my grandson during a brief outing
t
P. J. Alling wrote:
Just a couple of shots from today, from the traditional family get
together...
http://www.mindspring.com/~webster26/PESO_--_drama.html
That one had me laughing -- my little girl's a "dramatic" sort too!
I think the tilt is a vital part of the picture.
http://www.mindsp
Op Fri, 25 Nov 2005 15:34:00 +0100 schreef Vic Mortelmans
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
It's nice to see the results of different flash systems next to each
other to compare.
What I think is strange, is that the child's eyes are not filled with
fear in the 'better' pictures, imagining the looks of
Op Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:32:13 +0100 schreef Don Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
What is the diameter of the threads on the tubes. Outside diameter will
do. It it 42 mm?
No, far larger, about 60mm I guess. I'll check tonight.
Does the K mount go in and out of the camera without the need to mes
You can feel his excitment, just looking at it. Good capture.
dk
On 11/25/05, John Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've not posted much in a while so I thought I would put this one out
> there. My FA 50 f1.4 has been seriously underutilized and the sun
> hasn't been out in a while here in the
Whew. Thanx for the clarification.
Last week I saw a Tamron 90 Macro on one of the used camera web sites
(in Canada), that I check from time-to-time. I remember thinking "Wow,
that's a good deal". It's gone now.
dk
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:18:57 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Very nice. Interesting composition. Good stuff.
Paul
On Nov 25, 2005, at 3:00 AM, John Taylor wrote:
I've not posted much in a while so I thought I would put this one out
there. My FA 50 f1.4 has been seriously underutilized and the sun
hasn't been out in a while here in the Pacific Northwest.
At 01:35 AM 11/25/2005, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>
> FWIW, your picture wouldn't qualify as a nature print in our club and
interclub competitions.
And even with digital, a nature stock agency won't
take manipulated stuff... at least mine won't.
If all that was done, was to remove a single vapor
What is the diameter of the threads on
the tubes. Outside diameter will do.
It it 42 mm? Does the K mount go in and
out of the camera without the need to
mess about with a recessed spring? In
other words does it release with the
camera button?
Don
Extension tube set, consisting of a front
It's nice to see the results of different flash systems next to each
other to compare.
What I think is strange, is that the child's eyes are not filled with
fear in the 'better' pictures, imagining the looks of the photographer's
equipment at that phase...
Groeten,
Vic
Cotty wrote:
This
Well, you'll get there. It'll just take time. I stored my darkroom in
boxes in 1980 when I moved from Chicago to New Jersey. I never set it
up in Jersey because I didn't have a basement. Moved to Michigan in
1992. Finally got around to putting the darkroom back together sometime
around 1998. It
I don't know who did the video, which is pretty neat, but the music
is from one of my favorite groups, the Trans Siberian Orchestra. If
you have never listened to any of their holiday albums you're really
missing something!! Most of their stuff is available on iTunes.
Bob
On Nov 25, 20
On Nov 25, 2005, at 12:00 AM, John Taylor wrote:
http://i.pbase.com/o4/87/63987/1/52723043.DariusRiver.jpg
Jay, That's great just as it is! Caught that moment *right*!
Godfrey
My favorite film is the one that's right for the subject at hand.
For color in the studio or bright light outdoors it's Fuji Astia
100. I would have included Agfa RSX 100, but it won't be available
after the end of this year. These two produce the most neutral and
accurate colors of all c
On Nov 25, 2005, at 12:30 AM, Cotty wrote:
My favourite film is a roll of FP4 that's sitting (exposed) in the
bottom of my desk drawer. It's been there for some years and I have
absolutely no idea what's on it. Since I stopped shooting film about 2
years ago (a year into digital for me) it has b
On 11/24/05, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Amen!
>
>
>
> We're past due for a new poll, aren't' we? So what's your favorite
> film, and why?
Roman Holiday. Because Audrey Hepburn was gorgeous, and there was
real chemistry between her and Gregory Peck. The location shooting in
Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Nov 24, 2005, at 1:48 PM, Tom Reese wrote:
>
>> I have a different opinion. Manipulated images are fake and I think
>> it's wrong to deceive the viewer. I don't want to start another
>> argument. It's a difference of opinion and we've already cov
"William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From: "Paul Stenquist"
>
>> I'm no artist, but I like working in PhotoShop . Lots of fun. I don't
>> feel like I'm doing anything much different than what I did in the
>> darkroom, except that I have a lot more control.
>
>It's a different set of skills
John,
That's positively un'merican!
We'll have to get somebody with meals on wheels to drop by.
Regards, Bob S. ;-)
On 11/24/05, John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 01:49:31PM -0600, Don Sanderson wrote:
> > Don't pay any attention to Tom, eat all you want!
> > I m
Rob Studdert wrote:
> I have two main concerns/observations WRT to this type of competition
> photography, first I believe it tends to artificially unify photographers
> perspectives of what makes a good image.
That's an interesting idea and I think there would be some truth in it if the
same
LOL.
That is so cool.
Dave
On 11/25/05, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.cs.uregina.ca/~herbertj/movies/WizardsofWinter-SM.wmv
>
> Live well.
>
> William Robb
>
>
That looks familiar. I like the Google Earth hotspot.
Your next camera needs GPS.
Dave
On 11/25/05, Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Enough talk, time for another Pano PESO, this one is a bit of an experiment
> however. I hope I don't offend too many people but it's in Apple QTVR format
Hi all,
Some odds, ends and lenses I don't need anymore.
Original Asahi Pentax reverse adapter ø49, in original box. € 15,00
Extension tube set, consisting of a front and back part with 'male' and
'female' K-mounts and two intermediate rings. All parts screw together.
This set-up allows for
Herb Chong wrote:
as Rob said it earlier, $600, not $6K. if that is a hardship, should you
be shooting anything?
Herb...
Now, THAT's an irrational and elitist statement if I ever heard of one!
keith
- Original Message - From: "graywolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, Nov
Ouch!!
I bought the canon one, I costs 30+ Euros, sh!7
danilo
graywolf wrote:
Your wish is my command.
http://www.graywolfphoto.com/digital/_images/lathe.jpg
I am in the processing of researching and documenting it. It will
probably wind up as a display, as I am waiting for a newer one to use
that I also bought on ebay. This one is smaller than the one
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
[...]
drat I knew I should have been reading the list
earlier :)
achoo - annsan home with a cold
A cold what?
keith
Derby,
Thanks for the picture.
The double cable release for the bellows handles the timing. It first
closes down the lens and then triggers the shutter. This is handy for
depth of field preview before actually taking the picture.
All I need is the ability to be able to screw the release i
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005, Herb Chong wrote:
as Rob said it earlier, $600, not $6K.
Well I tried to find the notebook he was talking about in the UK and
the model is NA. Perhaps if I knew the spec I could judge. The
cheapest Compaq I found in my quick search was 450 GBP (800 USD?).
http://www.te
I like it!
I have to say I usually like industrial pics, and nightshots.
This one is both, I _have_ to like it! lol
I can't argue on metering, since my monitor is far-far away from a
well calibrated one (I'm at work, now), but it seems ok to me, and I
can barely see any distorsion (and just becaus
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005, William Robb wrote:
http://www.cs.uregina.ca/~herbertj/movies/WizardsofWinter-SM.wmv
My wishes too. Is the above typical Thanksgiving?
Kostas (it looked pretty Christmasy to me :-)
Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We're past due for a new poll, aren't' we? So what's your favorite
> film, and why? Give us details, such as which films you use for what
> subjects. Or do you use certain films with certain lenses or cameras?
Kodak Elite Color 200 (ex Supra): the fi
At 07:31 PM 11/24/2005, Scott Loveless wrote:
We're past due for a new poll, aren't' we? So what's your favorite
film, and why? Give us details, such as which films you use for what
subjects. Or do you use certain films with certain lenses or cameras?
Etc.
All the following are 35mm films:
Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have produced one for use with the 1.53x sensors but not for full frame, it
> wouldn't take too much tweaking though:
Great. Thanks. :-)
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de
manual
> fra: Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> We're past due for a new poll, aren't' we? So what's your favorite
> film, and why? Give us details, such as which films you use for what
> subjects. Or do you use certain films with certain lenses or cameras?
> Etc.
I still use film. In the LX m
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/temp/pano084.mov (~880kB)
Very cool, Rob.
Christian
On 25/11/05, Rob Studdert, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Enough talk, time for another Pano PESO, this one is a bit of an experiment
>however. I hope I don't offend too many people but it's in Apple QTVR format
>(MOV) so if you can't view these standalone or in an enabled Browser
then you
>might
Hi all,
Last weekend I flew to Barcelona for a short break. I don't fly often, so
I couldn't resist taking some pictures out of the window at sunrise. To my
dismay there is more flare (I think?) than I anticipated: See pictures 2
and 3. It can hardly be the lens (it's an A50/1,7), so I thin
1. My favorite is Astia 100F
It is enough sharp and detailed for 35mm and 120 format.
2. Velvia 50/120 (no comments)
3. Fuji Reala 100/120 (fantastic details both in higlights and shadows)
4. APX100/120 for BW. Super grainless film in diluted Rodinal.
Gasha
On 25/11/05, John Taylor, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I've not posted much in a while so I thought I would put this one out
>there. My FA 50 f1.4 has been seriously underutilized and the sun
>hasn't been out in a while here in the Pacific Northwest. But I
>happened to catch another snap of
On 24/11/05, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
>We're past due for a new poll, aren't' we? So what's your favorite
>film, and why? Give us details, such as which films you use for what
>subjects. Or do you use certain films with certain lenses or cameras?
My favourite film is a roll
I asked in an earlier message whether it would be possible to meet with some of
our London/UK guys today or tomorrow - sorry to be so late in advising that the
family stuff is still getting in the way! Unfortunately, I will not be able to
organise a meet any time this visit - bummer
Regards a
Rob,
Verrry Nice! For fun try holding down the mouse and panning through
the QTVR at ever increasing speeds.
Did you have to use a specialized tripod head to make this image?
Again a fantastic job Rob.
Jay
On Nov 24, 2005, at 8:00 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
Enough talk, time for another Pano P
On 24 Nov 2005 at 22:28, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Very cool. You seem to be having a lot of fun with panos. I'm going to
> have to give it a try. The Quick Time presentation is excellent.
Hi Paul,
Yes it is a lot of fun, just don't go trying to produce one with WA lenses if
you haven't attempte
On 24 Nov 2005 at 21:05, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> Excellent, very nicely done.
Thanks Godfrey, glad you checked it out.
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1
On 25 Nov 2005 at 9:53, Don Williams wrote:
> A great panorama. How do you make the
> images into a 'mov' file?
Thanks Don, I rendered a 360 degree cylindrical pano using
http://hugin.sourceforge.net/ and the converted it to a MOV using
http://www.pano2qtvr.com/
> Are those cottages to the ri
I've not posted much in a while so I thought I would put this one out
there. My FA 50 f1.4 has been seriously underutilized and the sun
hasn't been out in a while here in the Pacific Northwest. But I
happened to catch another snap of my grandson during a brief outing
to the Snoqualmie Rive
Herb is like Marie Antoinette. Qu'ils mangent de la brioche!
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: Boris Liberman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 25 November 2005 06:33
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Shoot now, focus later
>
> Hi!
>
> > Herb Chong wrote:
> >
>
101 - 174 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
