Pretty high for not being able to inspect it

https://shopgoodwill.com/item/159826903 -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

OT: The Hazards of being a stock photography model

https://digg.com/internet-culture/link/abigail-johnson-stock-photography-model-guardian-PSQRt1fjZk ? Dan Matyola *https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery * -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net to

OT: Another Top-10 camera list that Pentax missed out being on 

https://petapixel.com/2022/02/11/study-reveals-the-most-complained-about-cameras-in-the-world/ ... although Ricoh managed to get their GR III on there. -- Vivere in aeternum aut mori conatur -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss

Re: The danger of being a wildlife photographer

Fun stuff. Saw this set a couple of years ago. If its photoshop work, it’s very good. Some might be staged. They’re all a bit too perfect and share some characteristics that suggest they were ll done by the same person. But I enjoyed them anyway. > On Nov 11, 2020, at 2:15 PM, John Francis

The danger of being a wildlife photographer

My wife just showed me a dozen or so interesting photographs on facebook. I think this should take you to the first one; scroll right for more. https://www.facebook.com/ProtectTheAmazon/photos/a.100831077959138/130014621707450 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: PESO: Being Safe in NYC

>Unless one has a dog! Agreed! Bulent - http://patoloji.gen.tr http://celasun.wordpress.com/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/ http://photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=2226822

Re: PESO: Being Safe in NYC

Unless one has a dog! Dan Matyola *https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery * On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 3:33 AM Ralf R Radermacher < > Life without cats is possible but pointless. > > Ralf > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: PESO: Being Safe in NYC

On 9/4/20, Ralf R Radermacher, discombobulated, unleashed: >Life without cats is possible but pointless. MARK. -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ UK Shoot / Edit || (O) | -- _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: PESO: Being Safe in NYC

>Life without cats is possible but pointless. MARK ! Bulent - http://patoloji.gen.tr http://celasun.wordpress.com/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/ http://photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=2226822

Re: PESO: Being Safe in NYC

Am 09.04.20 um 08:48 schrieb Bulent Celasun: We may end up living with a cat soon... there seems to be a "reserved space" for one in our life. Life without cats is possible but pointless. Ralf -- Ralf R. Radermacher - Köln/Cologne, Germany Blog : http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com

Re: PESO: Being Safe in NYC

>Ashley would NOT have tolerated being dressed up for a second. That is exactly what I thought while looking at the image before reading your message. We may end up living with a cat soon... there seems to be a "reserved space" for one in our

Re: PESO: Being Safe in NYC

p" and Ashley jumped up on the chair > posing nicely I hit the release and moved away from the camera - she was > transfixed by the blinking red light ticing off the seconds. I got a > nice portrait (scroll right to see) and then had some photoshop fun. > Wanted it to be obviou

Re: PESO: Being Safe in NYC

the release and moved away from the camera - she was transfixed by the > blinking red light ticing off the seconds. I got a nice portrait (scroll > right to see) and then had some photoshop fun. > Wanted it to be obvious it was photoshopped... Ashley would NOT have > tolerated being dressed up for

PESO: Being Safe in NYC

nd then had some photoshop fun. Wanted it to be obvious it was photoshopped... Ashley would NOT have tolerated being dressed up for a second. see earlier peso of me in my mask.. ann -- ann sanfedele photography https://annsan.smugmug.com https://www.cafepress.com/annsanstuff https://www.l

Well it seems Ricoh is still supporting Pentax APS=C for the time being.

The new 11-18mm f2.8 DA* seems to have hit the store shelves looks like a pretty nice lens too.  It's priced above the level where my nose starts bleed unfortunately.  Now if only they release the K3 II successor that keeps being promised. -- America wasn't founded so that we could all

RE: A photograph that lies without being faked

. John in Brisbane -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Igor PDML-StR Sent: Friday, 19 February 2016 10:47 To: PDML@pdml.net Subject: Re: A photograph that lies without being faked (resending) I agree with Stan here. "Caveat Emptor!" BUT:

Re: A photograph that lies without being faked

(resending) I agree with Stan here. "Caveat Emptor!" BUT: believe it or not, some people do buy houses remotely, unseen. I cannot imagine myself doing that, but... Our friends moved to a small town in OH last Fall, and there was only one house on the market in the area they wanted (and

Re: A photograph that lies without being faked

Mark C - as you age you will realize that great water pressure is a mixed blessing… > On Feb 18, 2016, at 5:25 PM, Mark C wrote: > > It also has great water pressure! > > > On 2/18/2016 4:39 PM, Christine Nielsen wrote: >> I'd bet a truckload of organic fertilizer

Re: A photograph that lies without being faked

It also has great water pressure! On 2/18/2016 4:39 PM, Christine Nielsen wrote: I'd bet a truckload of organic fertilizer that the lawn wasn't as lush & green in reality, either. And I bet the listing described it as "charming"... ;) -c On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Mark Roberts

Re: A photograph that lies without being faked

It looks like a normal picture taken from the backyard viewing the house. Toine On 18 February 2016 at 15:28, Mark Roberts wrote: > Check it out: > http://petapixel.com/2016/02/16/real-estate-photo-illegal-false-advertising/ > I'm pretty sure that there's no

Re: A photograph that lies without being faked

I'd bet a truckload of organic fertilizer that the lawn wasn't as lush & green in reality, either. And I bet the listing described it as "charming"... ;) -c On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Mark Roberts wrote: > Bulent Celasun wrote: >

RE: A photograph that lies without being faked

> > 2016-02-18 16:28 GMT+02:00 Mark Roberts : > >> Check it out: > >> http://petapixel.com/2016/02/16/real-estate-photo-illegal-false- > adver > >> tising/ I'm pretty sure that there's no Photoshop involved here: The > >> photographer just got very close with a wide

Re: A photograph that lies without being faked

I see the replies, but have not received the original post. I have mixed feelings about the image. Firstly, I don't think it's a very good image whether it's deceptive or not. But, secondarily it does seem to be (if only just barely on purely technical grounds) within the canon of

Re: A photograph that lies without being faked

Bulent Celasun wrote: >Interesting. > >I believe it is unethical. No idea whether it should be considered >legal or not. Even if it's illegal I kind of think a $22,000 fine is silly. It's not as if anyone's going to be fooled by this photo and buy the house online,

Re: A photograph that lies without being faked

I'll put in with you, Mark. A solid, "could be." J - Original Message - From: "Mark Roberts" <postmas...@robertstech.com> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 6:28:01 AM Subject: A photograph that li

Re: A photograph that lies without being faked

No, it's only false advertising if the buyer purchases the property based solely on the photograph, and only a literal idiot* would do that. There can be no protection against idiocy as idiots are so ingenious. All it does is waste one's time visiting the place to see what it actually looks

Re: A photograph that lies without being faked

This could be a textbook example of using effective composition to tell your story… I won't comment on the legality or ethicality but practically speaking I think this is dumb. If someone were to visit the house based on their impression from the image, the mismatch with reality would be so

Re: A photograph that lies without being faked

Interesting. I believe it is unethical. No idea whether it should be considered legal or not. Bulent - http://patoloji.gen.tr http://celasun.wordpress.com/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/

A photograph that lies without being faked

Check it out: http://petapixel.com/2016/02/16/real-estate-photo-illegal-false-advertising/ I'm pretty sure that there's no Photoshop involved here: The photographer just got very close with a wide angle lens and then positioned the camera fairly low to the ground. (You can see from other photos

Two PESOs from being in the wrong place at the right time

Behind the Barn: https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/24863567236/in/album-72157662093706594/ Me and my shadow: https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/24522253299/in/album-72157662093706594/ -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss

Re: Pixsy.com - Tool for finding your images being used illegally

I guess I should have read your reply before I replied. On 1/12/2016 11:09 AM, Eric Featherstone wrote: On 12 January 2016 at 16:04, Darren Addy wrote: On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Eric Featherstone wrote: On 12 January 2016 at

Re: Pixsy.com - Tool for finding your images being used illegally

Maybe Darren uses the Mail Archive, which had nothing to do with the PDML besides archiving it, (as well as a lot of other mailing lists). They don't seem to show email addresses https://www.mail-archive.com/pdml@pdml.net/msg730216.html On 1/12/2016 11:01 AM, Eric Featherstone wrote: On 12

Re: Pixsy.com - Tool for finding your images being used illegally

On 12 January 2016 at 15:54, Darren Addy wrote: > So I'm guessing that > this thread came to their attention and she joined PDML to get access > to my email address (I don't believe it is viewable on the web > archives) It seems viewable to me. e.g.

Re: Pixsy.com - Tool for finding your images being used illegally

Hmmm. It sure is. Was not aware of that. Most archivers like that will obfuscate email addresses so they aren't scooped up by spammers. On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Eric Featherstone wrote: > On 12 January 2016 at 15:54, Darren Addy

Re: Pixsy.com - Tool for finding your images being used illegally

n to Pixsy and received compensation of a bit under $300. He said that the process took approximately 3 months. I suppose much of that timeline is dependent upon how quickly the infringer takes the matter seriously and perhaps the amount that is being sought. Personally, I would rather wait longer and ge

Re: Pixsy.com - Tool for finding your images being used illegally

On 12 January 2016 at 16:04, Darren Addy wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Eric Featherstone > wrote: >> On 12 January 2016 at 15:54, Darren Addy wrote: >>> So I'm guessing that >>> this thread came to their

Re: Pixsy.com - Tool for finding your images being used illegally

u can submit a claim with Pixsy and they will negotiate a licensing >>> fee with the infringer and pay the photographer 50%. >>> >>> However, since they are new, I can't find any info on how much those >>> negotitated fees might actually be. So for now, I plan to use

Re: Pixsy.com - Tool for finding your images being used illegally

any info on how much those >> negotitated fees might actually be. So for now, I plan to use Pixsy >> simply as my "bloodhound" and turn the infringements over to a real >> copyright/photo attorney. It may be slower, but I don't think >> attorney's charge THAT much unle

Re: Pixsy.com - Tool for finding your images being used illegally

ey. It may be slower, but I don't think attorney's charge THAT much unless they actually go to court, and being attorneys I'll bet they get higher amounts than Pixsy will. (At least two of my infringers are pretty big name web sites). Here is the Pixsy blog: https://www.pixsy.com/blog/ An ar

Re: Pixsy.com - Tool for finding your images being used illegally

they actually go to court, and being attorneys I'll bet they get higher amounts than Pixsy will. (At least two of my infringers are pretty big name web sites). Here is the Pixsy blog: https://www.pixsy.com/blog/ An article from fstoppers from back in March: https://fstoppers.com/business/excl

Re: Pixsy.com - Tool for finding your images being used illegally

torney's charge THAT much unless they actually go to court, and being attorneys I'll bet they get higher amounts than Pixsy will. (At least two of my infringers are pretty big name web sites). Here is the Pixsy blog: https://www.pixsy.com/blog/ An article from fstoppers from back in March: https://fstopp

Re: Pixsy.com - Tool for finding your images being used illegally

negotiate a licensing >>> fee with the infringer and pay the photographer 50%. >>> >>> However, since they are new, I can't find any info on how much those >>> negotitated fees might actually be. So for now, I plan to use Pixsy >>> simply as my "bl

Pixsy.com - Tool for finding your images being used illegally

negotitated fees might actually be. So for now, I plan to use Pixsy simply as my "bloodhound" and turn the infringements over to a real copyright/photo attorney. It may be slower, but I don't think attorney's charge THAT much unless they actually go to court, and being attorneys I'll be

Re: Pixsy.com - Tool for finding your images being used illegally

those > negotitated fees might actually be. So for now, I plan to use Pixsy > simply as my "bloodhound" and turn the infringements over to a real > copyright/photo attorney. It may be slower, but I don't think > attorney's charge THAT much unless they actually go to court, and >

Re: Slowing down & being creative

Thanks for posting that - I did not know how to automatically average layers in Photoshop so that will be very helpful! I've been doing it manually ala the technique they used with Gimp. On 10/16/2015 12:58 PM, Darren Addy wrote: Two things (hopefully provoking thought and/or discussion): #1

Re: Slowing down & being creative

Mark C wrote: >Thanks for posting that - I did not know how to automatically average >layers in Photoshop so that will be very helpful! I've been doing it >manually ala the technique they used with Gimp. That video doesn't even show the easiest way of averaging Layers in Photoshop. Here's the

Re: Slowing down & being creative

Actually that does work on my CS6 standard edition, nor does the process outlined in the video. Both the method you outline below and also the method in the video are only enabled in Photoshop CC and CS Extended. I actually delved into that last spring and learned that the only way to average

Re: Slowing down & being creative

If I'm not mistaken, the same effect can be achieved in-camera using multiple exposure and chossing the appropriate blend mode. A very informative thread on this subject can be found (for those of you for whom it is not against your religion to visit pentaxforums) at:

Re: Slowing down & being creative

You drink alone then? ;0) J Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 19, 2015, at 3:29 PM, P.J. Alling wrote: > > It's not against my religion to visit Pentax Forums, but I refuse to take > communion with them. > >> On 10/19/2015 6:07 PM, Darren Addy wrote: >> If I'm not

Re: Slowing down & being creative

It's not against my religion to visit Pentax Forums, but I refuse to take communion with them. On 10/19/2015 6:07 PM, Darren Addy wrote: If I'm not mistaken, the same effect can be achieved in-camera using multiple exposure and chossing the appropriate blend mode. A very informative thread on

Re: Slowing down & being creative

I always have my good friend Jack. On 10/19/2015 6:52 PM, Jack Davis wrote: You drink alone then? ;0) J Sent from my iPhone On Oct 19, 2015, at 3:29 PM, P.J. Alling wrote: It's not against my religion to visit Pentax Forums, but I refuse to take communion with

Re: Slowing down & being creative

Mark C wrote: >Actually that does work on my CS6 standard edition, nor does the process >outlined in the video. > >Both the method you outline below and also the method in the video are >only enabled in Photoshop CC and CS Extended. I actually delved into >that last spring and learned that the

Re: Slowing down & being creative

On 2015-10-17 19:49 , Darren Addy wrote: Well, obviously this interested no one other than me. i read the Speed Graphic one but didn't have anything to say; then i was out of time to look at the other on … -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: Slowing down & being creative

Didn't see it on first post, but I looked at it today. 1- David Burnett's 4x5 work is delightful. 2- This was an interesting view of the fact that focus stacking and stitching can be very effective tools. Of course, using them with the Pentax comparing to a single exposure with the Nikon

Re: Slowing down & being creative

(and be totally aware of) exposure settings and ISO (always 400 with TriX)? Is it perhaps because by being punctilious and methodical about exposure and focus, that carried over to composition as well? Or maybe I'm just not the photographer I used to be. Whatever the case may be, Burnett's results

Re: Slowing down & being creative

Darren, I did watch both enjoyed them. In fact, I started following the site (roadsandkingdoms). The Pentax vs Nikon video was very interesting and informative. Still, if and when time is as important as money (equipment price), the argument becomes weak... Thanks for bringing these to our

Re: Slowing down & being creative

Well, obviously this interested no one other than me. However, I will draw your attention to the stitching portion of the YouTube video where the latest version of MS ICE (Image Composite Editor) blew me away. I haven't looked at that program for a long time, it seems. It's a free panorama stitch

Slowing down & being creative

Two things (hopefully provoking thought and/or discussion): #1 David Burnett: The only photojournalist today working with a Speed Graphic http://roadsandkingdoms.com/2013/the-speed-graphic-returns/ http://www.davidburnett.com/gallery.html?gallery=Big%20Camera#/0

Re: PESO Being a Mom

Just a lot of joy in those photos. A lot of joy. On 10/19/14, 5:33 PM, pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote: Message: 11 Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 17:11:00 -0400 From: Paul Stenquistpnstenqu...@comcast.net To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net Subject: PESO Being a Mom Message-ID:adfe6d25-0870-4bdd

Re: PESO Being a Mom

Tender moments, well captured rendered. One can almost feel the skin texture. Alan C -Original Message- From: Paul Stenquist Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2014 11:11 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: PESO Being a Mom Today at the farmers market. A sequence: http://photo.net

Re: PESO Being a Mom

Paul, it a very nice series. In general, - I like sequences of similar photos giving more live by showing small changes in the positions and facial expressions. (I'm always struggling with how to present those myself though, as some people are reluctant to click more than once and/or realize

PESO Being a Mom

Today at the farmers market. A sequence: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17886184size=lg http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17886187size=lg http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17886188size=lg -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: PESO Being a Mom

or.. Watch the birdie :-) she's ready for Halloween - very cute ann On 10/19/2014 17:11, Paul Stenquist wrote: Today at the farmers market. A sequence: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17886184size=lg http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17886187size=lg

Re: On email from Yahoo being classified as spam

on 2014-04-08 18:51 Igor Roshchin wrote But I should mention that I understand the reason why Yahoo made that change: the spam e-mails pretending being from Yahoo accounts have been a huge problem recently. i don't see this as related; i get far more spam from hacked Yahoo accounts

Re: On email from Yahoo being classified as spam

Well said, Steve. Jack - Original Message - From: steve harley p...@paper-ape.com To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Sent: Wednesday, April 9, 2014 9:09:13 AM Subject: Re: On email from Yahoo being classified as spam on 2014-04-08 18:51 Igor Roshchin wrote But I should

Re: On email from Yahoo being classified as spam

, 2014 9:09:13 AM Subject: Re: On email from Yahoo being classified as spam on 2014-04-08 18:51 Igor Roshchin wrote But I should mention that I understand the reason why Yahoo made that change: the spam e-mails pretending being from Yahoo accounts have been a huge problem recently. i don't see

Re: On email from Yahoo being classified as spam

down. On 4/9/2014 12:09 PM, steve harley wrote: on 2014-04-08 18:51 Igor Roshchin wrote But I should mention that I understand the reason why Yahoo made that change: the spam e-mails pretending being from Yahoo accounts have been a huge problem recently. i don't see this as related; i get far

Re: On email from Yahoo being classified as spam

on 2014-04-09 11:22 John Sessoms wrote I'm getting SPAM from Yahoo this morning. Looks like some kind of phishing. Passes the DMARC because it is sent from a Yahoo server. when i get this it is generally from an acquaintance with a legitimate account that got hacked; it gets sent to everyone

Re: On email from Yahoo being classified as spam

On 4/9/2014 2:33 PM, steve harley wrote: on 2014-04-09 11:22 John Sessoms wrote I'm getting SPAM from Yahoo this morning. Looks like some kind of phishing. Passes the DMARC because it is sent from a Yahoo server. when i get this it is generally from an acquaintance with a legitimate account

Re: On email from Yahoo being classified as spam

On 9 Apr 2014, at 20:06, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote: On 4/9/2014 2:33 PM, steve harley wrote: on 2014-04-09 11:22 John Sessoms wrote I'm getting SPAM from Yahoo this morning. Looks like some kind of phishing. Passes the DMARC because it is sent from a Yahoo server. when i

Re: On email from Yahoo being classified as spam

on 2014-04-09 13:16 Bob W-PDML wrote It isn't necessarily their account that was hacked. Suppose my account was hacked and the hacker started looping through each name in my contacts and using that as the from address to send an email to each name in the address book, you would likely receive

Re: On email from Yahoo being classified as spam

On 4/9/2014 5:31 PM, steve harley wrote: on 2014-04-09 13:16 Bob W-PDML wrote It isn't necessarily their account that was hacked. Suppose my account was hacked and the hacker started looping through each name in my contacts and using that as the from address to send an email to each name in the

Re: On email from Yahoo being classified as spam

John, Just in case: If you are concerned about e-mails that you are sending to PDML from your Yahoo account via Yahoo smtp servers, than the recent change described in the links posted by Matthew should not affect you. It affects only Yahoo users who are sending e-mail via smtp servers OTHER

Re: On email from Yahoo being classified as spam

On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote: Just in case: If you are concerned about e-mails that you are sending to PDML from your Yahoo account via Yahoo smtp servers, than the recent change described in the links posted by Matthew should not affect you. It

Re: On email from Yahoo being classified as spam

Quoting Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com: On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote: Just in case: If you are concerned about e-mails that you are sending to PDML from your Yahoo account via Yahoo smtp servers, than the recent change described in the links posted by

Re: On email from Yahoo being classified as spam

On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org wrote: Quoting Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com: On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote: Just in case: If you are concerned about e-mails that you are sending to PDML from your Yahoo account via

Re: On email from Yahoo being classified as spam

Here's another article discussing this Yahoo change. It suggests that there's a fix that email list operators may be able to implement fairly easily, depending on the list software in use of course. http://www.spamresource.com/2014/04/up-in-arms-about-yahoos-dmarc-policy.html I have no idea if

Re: On email from Yahoo being classified as spam

, if that is the desired behavior, as it may break filters (will require to reconfigure them) for some people. But I should mention that I understand the reason why Yahoo made that change: the spam e-mails pretending being from Yahoo accounts have been a huge problem recently. The problem stems from

Re: On email from Yahoo being classified as spam

My problem with Yahoo's smtp server is separate from the other problem. But it does keep me from being able to test how the other problem might affect me. The combination of the two problems, along with Yahoo's lackadaisical contempt for PAYING customers who need support is a crock of shit. I

Re: On email from Yahoo being classified as spam

There are two things going on here. I don't know exactly how they are related. But I know that they are. 1. Something in Yahoo's new DMARC policy is breaking email sent from mailing lists. It apparently affects *all* mailing lists, not just PDML. For Gmail users it shows up as a tag of some

On email from Yahoo being classified as spam

This problem is affecting most of my mailing lists, and it appears to be due to a deliberate change by Yahoo: https://wordtothewise.com/2014/04/brief-dmarc-primer/ https://wordtothewise.com/2014/04/example-bounces-due-yahoo-preject/ Endusers can do a couple things . For one-to-one mail make sure

Re: On email from Yahoo being classified as spam

On 4/7/2014 5:30 PM, Matthew Hunt wrote: This problem is affecting most of my mailing lists, and it appears to be due to a deliberate change by Yahoo: https://wordtothewise.com/2014/04/brief-dmarc-primer/ https://wordtothewise.com/2014/04/example-bounces-due-yahoo-preject/ Endusers can do a

Re: On email from Yahoo being classified as spam

Wow, there’s just been an outburst of shouting in the IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force, the geeks who keep this whole thang running) about this, so it’s not just you, and I imagine there are some people having a well-deserved Really Bad Day over at Yahoo just now. On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 2:30

Re: On email from Yahoo being classified as spam

On 4/7/2014 5:58 PM, Tim Bray wrote: Wow, there’s just been an outburst of shouting in the IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force, the geeks who keep this whole thang running) about this, so it’s not just you, and I imagine there are some people having a well-deserved Really Bad Day over at Yahoo

Re: On email from Yahoo being classified as spam

Maybe someone could give 'em a few whacks about the damage they've done to Flickr while they are at it. I don't think it's my imagination that daily Flickr use is down since their new UI phase-in. On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote: Wow, there’s just been an

Re: On email from Yahoo being classified as spam

on 2014-04-07 15:58 Tim Bray wrote Wow, there’s just been an outburst of shouting in the IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force, the geeks who keep this whole thang running) about this, so it’s not just you, and I imagine there are some people having a well-deserved Really Bad Day over at Yahoo

FS: lenses not being used much

AF 1.7x tc. $300 A* 300/4. $425 FA 28/2.8. $250 70/2.4 LTD w/ hood $450 They are all hard to part with but these days things are changing in our lives. And little use means someone else can get more value from them than I. US shipping is included. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: PESO - Being Watched

. Great tableau. I'd love to see results from a photo walk with you and Annsan. pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote: Message: 8 Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 23:17:54 -0400 From: knarfknarftheria...@gmail.com To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net Subject: PESO - Being Watched Message-ID:6f0fcb8f-d49c

Re: PESO - Being Watched

...@gmail.com To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net Subject: PESO - Being Watched Message-ID:6f0fcb8f-d49c-46cb-b77e-5ee8adc13...@email.android.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 More street stuff on a wet Parkdale afternoon: http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.ca/2013/10/being

Re: PESO - Being Watched

Oh yeah now you're clickin. Great tableau. I'd love to see results from a photo walk with you and Annsan. pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote: Message: 8 Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 23:17:54 -0400 From: knarfknarftheria...@gmail.com To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net Subject: PESO - Being Watched

Re: PESO - Being Watched

://knarfinthecity.blogspot.ca/2013/10/being-watched.html?m=1 Hope you enjoy. Comments always welcome. Cheers, frank “Analysis kills spontaneity.” -- Henri-Frederic Amiel -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML

PESO - Being Watched

More street stuff on a wet Parkdale afternoon: http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.ca/2013/10/being-watched.html?m=1 Hope you enjoy. Comments always welcome. Cheers, frank “Analysis kills spontaneity.” -- Henri-Frederic Amiel -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman

Re: PESO - Being Watched

Now that's a well behaved hound. Alan -Original Message- From: knarf Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 5:17 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: PESO - Being Watched More street stuff on a wet Parkdale afternoon: http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.ca/2013/10/being-watched.html?m=1

Re: facebook post about being the community photographer

On 10/8/2013 8:47 AM, Larry Colen wrote: Thanks Boris. There's a lot to the subject, on both sides of the camera. It's a tough subject to write about without sounding like I showed up and did something without being asked, and now you owe me. On the other hand, there are a lot of people who

Re: facebook post about being the community photographer

Do journalists actually use the inverted pyramid these days? I don't even thing most know what a pyramid is. On 10/7/2013 2:42 PM, Bob W wrote: The inverted pyramid is the writer's friend as far as this sort of thing is concerned. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_pyramid On 7 Oct

Re: facebook post about being the community photographer

On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 12:05:05PM -0400, P.J. Alling wrote: Do journalists actually use the inverted pyramid these days? I don't even thing most know what a pyramid is. I don't think most people know what a journalist is. On 10/7/2013 2:42 PM, Bob W wrote: The inverted pyramid is the

Re: facebook post about being the community photographer

FWIW, I read through the entire thing without a problem. Though, admittedly, I am a pretty wordy writer. Still, it just doesn't strike me as all that out-of-place to muse at some length on-topic in the context of a discussion list, or even on Facebook for that matter, since they truncate

Re: facebook post about being the community photographer

On 8 Oct 2013, at 19:04, Walt ldott...@gmail.com wrote: FWIW, I read through the entire thing without a problem. Though, admittedly, I am a pretty wordy writer. Still, it just doesn't strike me as all that out-of-place to muse at some length on-topic in the context of a discussion list,

Re: facebook post about being the community photographer

On 10/8/2013 1:13 PM, Bob W wrote: On 8 Oct 2013, at 19:04, Walt ldott...@gmail.com wrote: FWIW, I read through the entire thing without a problem. Though, admittedly, I am a pretty wordy writer. Still, it just doesn't strike me as all that out-of-place to muse at some length on-topic in the

Re: facebook post about being the community photographer

On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 07:13:07PM +0100, Bob W wrote: On 8 Oct 2013, at 19:04, Walt ldott...@gmail.com wrote: FWIW, I read through the entire thing without a problem. Though, admittedly, I am a pretty wordy writer. Still, it just doesn't strike me as all that out-of-place to muse at

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >