2009/3/21 Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com:
Call me a lazy slacker
Rick you lazy slacker...
Stan, I agree with Rick. Take the 16-50mm 50-135mm.
When I play tourist the 16-45/16-50mm focal length is always my most used lens
I'd also add the 21mm f3.2 for when you want to to travel small
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 9:54 AM, David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/3/21 Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com:
Call me a lazy slacker
Rick you lazy slacker...
Stan, I agree with Rick. Take the 16-50mm 50-135mm.
When I play tourist the 16-45/16-50mm focal length is always my most used
On Mar 21, 2009, at 4:38, Rick Womer wrote:
So, Stan, are you traveling to see things, eat good food, and take
pictures, or are you traveling for lens-swapping exercise?
Call me a lazy slacker, but I would take the two zooms and the super-
wide. Those are such good lenses that you would
Stan Halpin wrote:
16-50/2.8
50-135/2.8
If it were me, that'd be my kit ... those two lenses and one body, or
maybe two. I don't like looking festooned with camera gear when I'm
out sightseeing and I don't want to have to fuss with a bunch of
different primes. Light, fast, unobtrusive.
rationale:
The reason for my kit suggestion is that I intensely dislike shooting
with wide-normal-portrait zooms. I find their imaging qualities and
bulk get in my way a lot of the time.
The 16-50/2.8 is extremely bulky and very heavy compared to the DA21
and FA43. The two short primes
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
rationale:
I also find that if I carry more than three or four lenses, I'm wasting
my time trying to decide what to use. I lose picture opportunities that
way. And I hate carrying all that bulk. Three lenses and a light tripod
do MUCH more than five-six lenses for me.
Hi Stan,
I would carry 21mm, 50-135mm and one other prime (35mm, or 43mm in your case).
OT: I would also think what filters you want (polarizer for sure, uv
for protection, may be even graduated nd?) It is good then your
lenses can share some filters.
I I were you I would scan through your recent
The size and bulk of the DA* 16-50 aren't an obstacle for me. When
shooting with a K20D with battery grip attached, it actually provides
better balance than smaller lenses. And while I don't have an FA 43
with which to compare it, I can say with certainty that its image
quality is better
So much has been thrown your way by now, your brain is probably
reeling. I know mine is.
Go for a X70 and carry nothing else but a half dozen 8 gig SDHC cards.
Shoot HD movies when appropriate. Spend more time at the computer post-
processing than the length of your vacation. :-)
Ah, but I bought the grip for the K10D and hated the additional weight
and bulk of that too. I used it once, to test it, and sold it a year
later.
Wide to portrait zooms just don't float my boat. The best one I've
ever had is the Vario-Elmarit-D 14-50/2.8-3.5 ASPH OIS that came with
the
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Paul Stenquist
[pnstenqu...@comcast.net]
Sent: 21 March 2009 17:46
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Lens travel kit dilemma
The size and bulk of the DA* 16-50 aren't an obstacle for me. When
shooting with a K20D
Yes, it's all a matter of personal taste and shooting styles. Prior to
going digital, I was shooting most of my work with the 6x7, so size
has never been a serious consideration for me. (Ironically, my second
most-used camera at that time was the little Leica iiif.) More
importantly, I
...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Paul Stenquist [pnstenqu...@comcast.net]
Sent: 21 March 2009 17:46
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Lens travel kit dilemma
The size and bulk of the DA* 16-50 aren't an obstacle for me. When
shooting with a K20D with battery grip attached
Of Paul Stenquist
[pnstenqu...@comcast.net]
Sent: 21 March 2009 19:49
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Lens travel kit dilemma
I have both as well. Shooting cars in continuous autofocus mode during
the dream cruise, it became obvious that the USM motor in the newer
lens was much more
Stan Halpin wrote:
Re-visiting a topic that has been discussed off and on before on the
list...
In 3 weeks or so I will be going to Rome with my wife for a short week.
(5.5 days on the ground.) I am trying to decide what camera gear to take
with me.
My standard two-lens kit is the DA*16-50
] On Behalf Of
Paul Stenquist [pnstenqu...@comcast.net]
Sent: 21 March 2009 19:49
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Lens travel kit dilemma
I have both as well. Shooting cars in continuous autofocus mode during
the dream cruise, it became obvious that the USM motor in the newer
lens
On Mar 21, 2009, at 15:27, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I have almost never seen any evidence of visible CA in DA* 16-50
files. On the other hand, many FA lenses seem prone to CA when used
in digital applications. However, I have to admit that I haven't
studied FA 35/2 results at a pixel level.
is an excellent one. In fact my brother (and fellow Pentaxian) told
me the same thing when I discussed this dilemma with him last week.
So, I pulled up the Lightroom data...
On my Venice trip two years ago my primary camera was a K10D, my
secondary was a *ist-D. This time both cameras
Stan,
Excellent analysis of your usage.
Here's another question to consider if you want to dig into your data
a bit more, when you were using primes, how
often did you use them at an aperture that is wider than your zooms
would handle?
Another thing to consider is, if rather than looking at all
By the way Scott - great suggestion!
I can see it now:
a. Stan takes off a lens, asks for a different lens.
b. Street urchin/photo assistant hands him a lens, stashes the one
just replaced.
c. Stan concentrates on getting just the right framing and lighting
for the definitive photo of a
Proof positive that you were the proud owner of a broken lens.
Paul
On Mar 21, 2009, at 9:33 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Mar 21, 2009, at 15:27, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I have almost never seen any evidence of visible CA in DA* 16-50
files. On the other hand, many FA lenses seem prone to
Good question Larry. I'll look at that tomorrow.
stan
On Mar 21, 2009, at 8:50 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Stan,
Excellent analysis of your usage.
...
Another thing to consider is, if rather than looking at all of your
pictures, you just look at your favorite 20, or 50, which lenses did
you use?
Stan Halpin wrote:
Re-visiting a topic that has been discussed off and on before on the
list...snippage
Be a man. One camera, one lens. K20D and FA35/2.
you know you want to.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
Re-visiting a topic that has been discussed off and on before on the
list...
In 3 weeks or so I will be going to Rome with my wife for a short
week. (5.5 days on the ground.) I am trying to decide what camera
gear to take with me.
Some considerations:
a. Most of what I take should fit
- Original Message -
From: Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 12:23 AM
Subject: Lens travel kit dilemma
Re-visiting a topic that has been discussed off and on before on the
list...
In 3 weeks or so I
My K20D is still a big workflow problem due to WB-fixing issues.
K20-DNG-Photolab for WB-TIFF (85M)-Lightroom-DNG (a mere 50M
compressed).
I'm assuming that Pentax and/or Adobe will fix this up pretty soon.
Anyhow... the family's off to Maui for spring break and I'm wondering
whether the
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 9:31 AM, Tim Bray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's really easy to take a couple
hundred shots in a Hawaii afternoon, and I'm not sure I'm strong
enough for that much time in Photolab.
Then don't use Photolab.
K20D owners using PS LR are somehow managing to get usable
- Original Message -
From: Tim Bray
Subject: Maui dilemma
My K20D is still a big workflow problem due to WB-fixing issues.
K20-DNG-Photolab for WB-TIFF (85M)-Lightroom-DNG (a mere 50M
compressed).
I'm assuming that Pentax and/or Adobe will fix this up pretty soon.
A couple
I copy my .pef files onto my hard drive. When I work with an image I
will save as a PSD. When I am finished, I will resave as either as a
tif or jpeg, depending on how it will be used.
The only confusing thing to me is that the raw tool in pse3 saves the
changes although as far as I can
All the PS converters save the tool settings, not a revised pef or dng. I
sometimes move a file from one computer to another. The converter adjustments
don't go with it.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: John Graves [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I copy my .pef files onto my
If you set Camera Raw to use a distributed settings cache, it will
create a .XMP sidecar file for every RAW file you open with it. That
will contain your adjustment parameters. You move both the original
RAW and the .XMP file together from one system to another in order to
preserve the
John Graves wrote:
I copy my .pef files onto my hard drive. When I work with an image I
will save as a PSD. When I am finished, I will resave as either as a
tif or jpeg, depending on how it will be used.
Copy from memory cards to hard drive. Mark all of them as read only.
Copy them to
frank theriault wrote:
First the photo:
http://tinyurl.com/2nvdh3
http://bp2.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RzG94gS56dI/A8M/K408ofTTREE/s1600-h/nov_7+002.jpg
The woman was playing one of those scratch and win lotto cards, and
apparently won...
Now the dilemma:
Um, when you load
On Nov 7, 2007, at 5:41 AM, frank theriault wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/2nvdh3
The woman was playing one of those scratch and win lotto cards, and
apparently won...
I like this photo but it's one that I would crop. The Cinnabon sign
upper left pulls my eye away from the woman and her
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault
Subject: PESO - And We Have a Winner! - and a dilemma
First the photo:
http://tinyurl.com/2nvdh3
http://bp2.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RzG94gS56dI/A8M/K408ofTTREE/s1600-h/nov_7+002.jpg
The woman was playing one of those scratch
frank theriault wrote:
is there any way of retrieving the
original photo, as it was out of the camera? Or did I completely
pooch myself by hitting save, instead of save as (in which I'd
have created a new file, rather than replacing the original)?
You could try recovering the original file from
http://tinyurl.com/2nvdh3
Nice snap, but the Cinnabon does two things: makes it look like an ad for
Cinnabon, and makes me REALLY hungry.
Regarding the lost original: as others have said, use a file-recovery
software on your card unless you've taken more photos on it since you
downloaded
going save as one better is to never work on an original. creating a
copy in a working directory away from the directory where you store
originals ... and remembering to identify the original as connected to
the processed image.
yep I have messed up more than once.
Bran
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
, and
apparently won...
Now the dilemma:
I'm dead tired last night, doing a bit of processing in PS. I'm done,
and I'm closing up the computer to get ready for bed. I'm not really
done with this photo, as I'm not quite satisfied as is. I hit save,
the computer asks if I want to save
First the photo:
http://tinyurl.com/2nvdh3
http://bp2.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RzG94gS56dI/A8M/K408ofTTREE/s1600-h/nov_7+002.jpg
The woman was playing one of those scratch and win lotto cards, and
apparently won...
Now the dilemma:
I'm dead tired last night, doing a bit of processing
The woman was playing one of those scratch and win
lotto cards, and
apparently won...
Now the dilemma:
I'm dead tired last night, doing a bit of processing
in PS. I'm done,
and I'm closing up the computer to get ready for
bed. I'm not really
done with this photo, as I'm not quite satisfied
In a message dated 11/7/2007 11:39:07 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
going save as one better is to never work on an original. creating a
copy in a working directory away from the directory where you store
originals ... and remembering to identify the original as
On 1/24/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 23/1/07, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
Define distasteful !
Filming/reporting a best of blue vein cheese tasting.
LOL thanks mate. Coffee-nostrils.
Whoops.
Cheers,
Dave :-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/01/24 Wed AM 12:42:09 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Moral dilemma
Seems to me that the BBC can't decide if it's organized. (or
disorganized), crime.
Salvage (saving something from total loss) very much
In a message dated 1/23/2007 12:56:34 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You are a person of good taste and manners. Which is why you will never make
a journalist.
===
Mark!
Marnie aka Doe ;-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Jan 23, 2007, at 17:12, Cotty wrote:
On 23/1/07, Charles Robinson, discombobulated, unleashed:
While I'm not sure I'd take pictures of the BODY, I would document
the scene around my house/apartment if such a thing occurred.
Simply because that is what I do with a camera - record events.
On 24/1/07, Charles Robinson, discombobulated, unleashed:
I guess when I said around my house/apartment I was referring to
the landscape OUTSIDE of the residence, not IN it.
Charles, if you've got a busy life inside your apartment, that's fine by
me buddy ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
From: John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/01/23 Tue AM 02:07:59 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Moral dilemma
What would you have done?
Yesterday, a young man died in the small park opposite where I live. The
street was full of police and their vehicles, for about 5
On 22/1/07, K.Takeshita, discombobulated, unleashed:
This tells me that you are very decent person and of commonsense. I think
Police was wrong. In the country where I came from, or many other
countries, they quickly erect a tent to conceal the scene out of respect for
the deceased, regardless
On 23/1/07, John Coyle, discombobulated, unleashed:
Yesterday, a young man died in the small park opposite where I live. The
street was full of police and their vehicles, for about 5 hours all told.
Despite the fact that I could see all this action, and from our roof could
see the body and
On 23/1/07, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
You are a person of good taste and manners. Which is why you will never
make a journalist.
Thanks Mike ! ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On 23/1/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
That's pretty much what I was going to say, except that I hadn't
gotten as far as thinking about what I'd do if I were employed as
a news photographer.
I'd shoot the overall scene, shots of police collecting evidence
other than right
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/01/23 Tue AM 09:36:59 GMT
To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Moral dilemma
On 23/1/07, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
You are a person of good taste and manners. Which is why you will never
make a journalist.
Thanks Mike
On 1/23/07 4:27 AM, Cotty, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This tells me that you are very decent person and of commonsense. I think
Police was wrong. In the country where I came from, or many other
countries, they quickly erect a tent to conceal the scene out of respect for
the deceased,
On 23/1/07, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
My pleasure. 8-) As you so elegantly stated, journos often have to do
things that are distasteful and would not be something one would want to
do as an individual.
Define distasteful !
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
On 1/23/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 23/1/07, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
My pleasure. 8-) As you so elegantly stated, journos often have to do
things that are distasteful and would not be something one would want to
do as an individual.
Define distasteful !
Yes I think that does it!
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
Quoting David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 1/23/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Define distasteful !
Filming/reporting a best of blue vein cheese tasting.
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/01/23 Tue PM 12:34:26 GMT
To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Moral dilemma
On 23/1/07, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
My pleasure. 8-) As you so elegantly stated, journos often have to do
things that are distasteful and would
What would I have done?
I probably would have had no idea what was going on. But would be
bitching and moaning about all the cop cars blocking the street.
I would eventually find out what had happened and then felt like a selfish twit.
Cheers,
Dave
On 1/23/07, John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cotty wrote:
On 23/1/07, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
My pleasure. 8-) As you so elegantly stated, journos often have to do
things that are distasteful and would not be something one would want to
do as an individual.
Define distasteful !
Cotty,
Personally I don't think morality is an issue. I think it's about
personal comfort and the law.
...
If shooting (stills or video) in circumstances such as these is
uncomfortable then the outcome is obvious - one will not do it, and
probably think very little of those that would.
Ya just has to agree wit that...
Mark Roberts wrote:
Cotty wrote:
On 23/1/07, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
My pleasure. 8-) As you so elegantly stated, journos often have to do
things that are distasteful and would not be something one would want to
do as an
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: Moral dilemma
Sadly you would not make it as a news photographer sir. There may be no
obvious reason to you why need to shoot the corpse, but if your editor
later discovered you had not, you would not be working for him/her
again
On 23/1/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Define distasteful !
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/mods/eoskmount.html
;-)
I asked for that.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 23/1/07, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Define distasteful !
I meant it as a generic statement. Distasteful varies from person to
person, as well as having a cultural side. As a personal guide, I would
have it mean to take advantage of the subject. You could add
disclaimers such
On 23/1/07, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
Consider, Cotty. I drove today at work and approaching a crossing I
heard an ambulance's siren. Instinctively I turned to look in the
mirror (I have slightly wider custom inside mirror) only to realize
that nothing was in there. Meanwhile
On 23/1/07, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
Define distasteful !
Filming/reporting a best of blue vein cheese tasting.
LOL thanks mate. Coffee-nostrils.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On Jan 23, 2007, at 5:47 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Cotty wrote:
Define distasteful !
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/mods/eoskmount.html
;-)
LOL !!!
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
i think this would be me too! :)
russ
On 1/23/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What would I have done?
I probably would have had no idea what was going on. But would be
bitching and moaning about all the cop cars blocking the street.
I would eventually find out what had happened
All those things some a'hole sergeant tells you to do when you are in
the military? Of course some f'ing orificer told him to make you do
that. Some perverted polly told the officer to do that. And the
politician got the idea from something some tall bald-headed Limey News
Cameraman shot.
On 23/1/07, graywolf, discombobulated, unleashed:
All those things some a'hole sergeant tells you to do when you are in
the military? Of course some f'ing orificer told him to make you do
that. Some perverted polly told the officer to do that. And the
politician got the idea from something
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Cotty
Sent: 23 January 2007 09:26
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: Moral dilemma
On 23/1/07, John Coyle, discombobulated, unleashed:
Yesterday, a young man died in the small park opposite where
I live. The
street was full
It appears the real question here is what would you do with the pictures
taken?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Moral dilemma
On 23/1/07, John Coyle, discombobulated, unleashed:
Yesterday, a young man died in the small park opposite
Cotty wrote:
On 23/1/07, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Define distasteful !
I meant it as a generic statement. Distasteful varies from person to
person, as well as having a cultural side. As a personal guide, I would
have it mean to take advantage of the subject. You could add
On Jan 23, 2007, at 14:53, Kenneth Waller wrote:
It appears the real question here is what would you do with the
pictures
taken?
While I'm not sure I'd take pictures of the BODY, I would document
the scene around my house/apartment if such a thing occurred.
Simply because that is what
On 23/1/07, Charles Robinson, discombobulated, unleashed:
While I'm not sure I'd take pictures of the BODY, I would document
the scene around my house/apartment if such a thing occurred.
Simply because that is what I do with a camera - record events. And
that, while a bummer, is
Seems to me that the BBC can't decide if it's organized. (or
disorganized), crime.
Cotty wrote:
On 23/1/07, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Define distasteful !
I meant it as a generic statement. Distasteful varies from person to
person, as well as having a cultural
Hi!
Consider, Cotty. I drove today at work and approaching a crossing I
heard an ambulance's siren. Instinctively I turned to look in the
mirror (I have slightly wider custom inside mirror) only to realize
that nothing was in there. Meanwhile the ambulance was entering the
crossing on the
What would you have done?
Yesterday, a young man died in the small park opposite where I live. The
street was full of police and their vehicles, for about 5 hours all told.
Despite the fact that I could see all this action, and from our roof could
see the body and the various examinations
As an individual, amateur photographer, I might have looked for
interesting shots relating to the response to the call, but would not
have shot the body itself. That is just more than a little morbid for
me, and kinda' disrespectful of both the deceased and his/her family.
If I were a news
On 1/22/07 9:07 PM, John Coyle, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What would you have done?
Yesterday, a young man died in the small park opposite where I live. The
street was full of police and their vehicles, for about 5 hours all told.
Despite the fact that I could see all this action, and from
Just what you did, I think.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
Quoting John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What would you have done?
Yesterday, a young man died in the small park opposite where I
live. The
street was full of police and
On 1/22/07, John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What would you have done?
Yesterday, a young man died in the small park opposite where I live. The
street was full of police and their vehicles, for about 5 hours all told.
Despite the fact that I could see all this action, and from our roof
),
but the investigation going on may have been
interesting to review.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Tom Simpson
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 9:21 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Moral dilemma
As an individual, amateur
- Original Message -
From: John Coyle Subject: Moral dilemma
What would you have done?
Yesterday, a young man died in the small park opposite where I live. The
street was full of police and their vehicles, for about 5 hours all told.
Despite the fact that I could see all
or all three...
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: John Coyle Subject: Moral dilemma
What would you have done?
Yesterday, a young man died in the small park opposite where I live. The
street was full of police and their vehicles, for about 5 hours all told
Tom Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Coyle wrote:
What would you have done?
Yesterday, a young man died in the small park opposite where I live. The
street was full of police and their vehicles, for about 5 hours all told.
Despite the fact that I could see all this action, and
John Coyle wrote:
I did not shoot a single photograph.
I'll leave any further comment at this stage...
What you did was fine. But honestly, people die. They really do. And
taking photographs doesn't change the situation much.
Now, would it have been crude, tactless, or even taboo?
John Coyle wrote:
What would you have done?
Yesterday, a young man died in the small park opposite where I live. The
street was full of police and their vehicles, for about 5 hours all told.
Despite the fact that I could see all this action, and from our roof could
see the body and the
Buy *istDL today, or wait a little to get K100D in my country? Prices
will most probably be about the same but what's new in K100D, that I
desperately need? Very little... so, I'm perplexed, which one to buy.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED], IRC:[EMAIL PROTECTED], /bin/zsh. C|NK
--
If your choice is between the *ist-DL and the K100D then your choice is
obvious, wait for the K100. The major specifications are all the same,
except you for the addition of shake reduction, which should be a big
plus. If you were contemplating the K110D, then I'd say get the DL
now. For all
SR, better AF, improved exposure...I would wait.
--- Vid Strpic [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Buy *istDL today, or wait a little to get K100D in
my country? Prices
will most probably be about the same but what's
new in K100D, that I
desperately need? Very little... so, I'm perplexed,
P. J. Alling wrote:
If your choice is between the *ist-DL and the K100D then your choice is
obvious, wait for the K100. The major specifications are all the same,
except you for the addition of shake reduction, which should be a big
plus. If you were contemplating the K110D, then I'd say
A lot of people seem to be confusing the K10D, (if that's what it will
be called), the K100D and the K110D. I just wanted to be clear. The
K100D is already available everywhere on line and in stock at BH photo,
by the way, it should be a short wait.
Vid Strpic wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
It's starting to show up in stores now, not widely available. I'd expect
another couple of weeks before wide availability.
-Adam
P. J. Alling wrote:
A lot of people seem to be confusing the K10D, (if that's what it will
be called), the K100D and the K110D. I just wanted to be clear. The
Adam Maas wrote:
It's starting to show up in stores now, not widely available. I'd expect
another couple of weeks before wide availability.
That's the problem, I could buy it in USA, but shipping and taxes.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED], IRC:[EMAIL PROTECTED], /bin/zsh. C|NK
--
Wait. The K100D is a next generation camera, and it has image stabilization.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Vid Strpic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Buy *istDL today, or wait a little to get K100D in my country? Prices
will most probably be about the same but what's
Vid Strpic wrote:
Buy *istDL today, or wait a little to get K100D in my country? Prices
will most probably be about the same but what's new in K100D, that I
desperately need? Very little... so, I'm perplexed, which one to buy.
Wait until the K100D shows in your country. You will get
Kevin Waterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My problem is that photography has become more of a production line
than an art.
There's another thing that's nagging me about digital:
With analog, it takes very little money to produce a technical quality
that can't be distinguished from what you get
Very high quality analog equipment is certainly much more attainable
than comparable digital equipment at the present time. But this will
change as the digital market matures. Of course that will take time.
What matters more to me is that I can achieve very high quality color
printing at home
201 - 300 of 648 matches
Mail list logo
