Re: Seen this? Limited Edition K-3 mk iii

I’d buy one and put black tape over the logo. > On 26 Mar 2022, at 19:36, Ralf R Radermacher wrote: > > Am 24.03.22 um 23:26 schrieb John Francis: > >> I'd be a little afraid that the only response when I pushed the >> shutter release... > Such special editions aren't meant for taking photos.

Re: Seen this? Limited Edition K-3 mk iii

Am 24.03.22 um 23:26 schrieb John Francis: I'd be a little afraid that the only response when I pushed the shutter release... Such special editions aren't meant for taking photos. Just like their equivalents from Leica, Rollei etc. they'll be unpacked with white gloves and go straight into

Re: Seen this? Limited Edition K-3 mk iii

That's weird. On 3/24/2022 3:23 PM, Darren Addy wrote: https://petapixel.com/2022/03/23/ricoh-is-crowdfunding-a-jet-black-limited-edition-k-3-mark-iii-in-japan/ -- Vivere in aeternum aut mori conatur -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com -- %(real_name)s

Re: Seen this? Limited Edition K-3 mk iii

-limited-edition-k-3-mark-iii-in-japan/ A triumph of (dis)appearance over functionality. 0% takeup so far. Colour me jet-black astonished. -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly

Re: Seen this? Limited Edition K-3 mk iii

On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 01:01:00PM -0700, l...@red4est.com wrote: > That would be perfect for photographing a Disaster Area concert. I'd be a little afraid that the only response when I pushed the shutter release would be a little message that appeared in the iviewfinder that said "Please do not

Re: Seen this? Limited Edition K-3 mk iii

That would be perfect for photographing a Disaster Area concert. On March 24, 2022 12:23:41 PM PDT, Darren Addy wrote: >https://petapixel.com/2022/03/23/ricoh-is-crowdfunding-a-jet-black-limited-edition-k-3-mark-iii-in-japan/ > >-- >“The Earth is Art, The Photographer is on

Seen this? Limited Edition K-3 mk iii

https://petapixel.com/2022/03/23/ricoh-is-crowdfunding-a-jet-black-limited-edition-k-3-mark-iii-in-japan/ -- “The Earth is Art, The Photographer is only a Witness ” ― Yann Arthus-Bertrand, Earth from Above -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le

Re: Limited

I like standard lenses, I don't have much use for medium wide angles. bill On Sat., Jul. 31, 2021, 9:22 p.m. , wrote: > > > On July 31, 2021 7:35:46 PM PDT, Bill wrote: > >It's quite a nice standard lens on APS-C. I don't like the full frame > angle > >of view that much. > > Funny, I didn't

Re: Limited

On July 31, 2021 7:35:46 PM PDT, Bill wrote: >It's quite a nice standard lens on APS-C. I don't like the full frame angle >of view that much. Funny, I didn't like it as well on aps as I do on full frame. > >bill > >On Sat., Jul. 31, 2021, 3:35 p.m. , wrote: > >> Went to a local camera store

Re: Limited

It's quite a nice standard lens on APS-C. I don't like the full frame angle of view that much. bill On Sat., Jul. 31, 2021, 3:35 p.m. , wrote: > Went to a local camera store today. They’ve got a black 31/1.8. $650. I > drooled a little, but not on the lens. The first one I’ve ever touched. >

Limited

Went to a local camera store today. They’ve got a black 31/1.8. $650. I drooled a little, but not on the lens. The first one I’ve ever touched. -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link

New 21mm Limited. Was about the APS-C flagship.

mention the max aperture. I also hate the integrated lens shade :( The front element looks too small for it to be a 2.8 (I have the FA 20mm f/2.8) so I'm betting it'll be f/4.0 If they are fully buying into the Limited cult, it will be an oddball number, 3.7 or something like that. Given

TRADE: My (mint) silver FA 77mm f1.8 Limited for your DA* 200mm

I realize that I could (with perhaps a bit of patience) sell my Silver 77mm Limited with more than enough to purchase an excellent DA* 200mm f2.8, but with the ebay/paypal fees and hassles of listing (etc) I thought I would try a direct approach... Let me know if you are interested in a trade

Re: Pentax 15mm F/4 SMC DA ED AL Limited

On 12/26/2016 4:03 PM, Larry Colen wrote: Ricoh could do wonders for their lens lineup if they just made a deal with Samyang to produce weather sealed auto-focus versions of some of the Samyang primes (85/1.4, 24/1.4 ...) It would be nice. -- Science - Questions we may never find answers

Re: Pentax 15mm F/4 SMC DA ED AL Limited

John wrote: Anyone try this on a K1 yet? I'm considering getting myself a late Christmas present. How badly does it vignette? If it's not too bad, I could probably "fix" it in Camera Raw. An alternative might be the Pentax HD PENTAX-D FA 15-30mm f/2.8 ED SDM WR, which would have roughly the

Re: Pentax 15mm F/4 SMC DA ED AL Limited

On Mon, 26 Dec 2016 12:42:00 -0500, you wrote: > Weathe rsealing and decent all around quality kind of make it a no brainer. I really wish someone made a weather-sealed ultra-wide prime for the K-1. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: Pentax 15mm F/4 SMC DA ED AL Limited

If I were to buy a K-1 I think a 15-30 would be a must have. Weather sealing and decent all around quality kind of make it a no brainer. That does make a k-1 a lot more expensive though and is why I have held off on buying one. I'll just make due with my 12-24 that seems to have picked up slightly

Re: Pentax 15mm F/4 SMC DA ED AL Limited

Here are some more things to think about. There is also the laowa 15mm that is supposedly a strong performer. It is also a macro lens and has some tilt capability. It's $500 at B Kind of a bargain considering what you can do with it. They have a 12mm/2.8 (!) coming as well they are claiming as

Re: Pentax 15mm F/4 SMC DA ED AL Limited

John, you should look into the Samyang 14mm f2.8. It's available in K mount, full frame and for what it is, very inexpensive. It's manual focus, but at f5.6 setting focus at about 30 feet should give acceptable in focus from about 5-6 feet to infinity. Even at f 2.8 you can get acceptable

Re: Pentax 15mm F/4 SMC DA ED AL Limited

rmous size difference between the DA 15 Ltd and a full-frame 15mm I would expect the Limited to vignette massively. The A series has at least a stop of fall off at the corners as well. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE fro

Re: Pentax 15mm F/4 SMC DA ED AL Limited

rmous size difference between the DA 15 Ltd and a full-frame 15mm I would expect the Limited to vignette massively. Drat! The new HD PENTAX-D FA 15-30mm f/2.8 costs three times as much. Can't do that just now. KEH has a couple of 15mm f/4 on offer that I could probably afford, but I don't w

Re: Pentax 15mm F/4 SMC DA ED AL Limited

the DA 15 Ltd and a full-frame 15mm I would expect the Limited to vignette massively. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: Pentax 15mm F/4 SMC DA ED AL Limited

I haven't tried the DA 15 on the K1, but I would expect it to vignette significantly. The DA 12-24 vignettes to a great degree. The D FA 15-30 is a superb lens. Paul via phone > On Dec 25, 2016, at 6:18 PM, John wrote: > > Anyone try this on a K1 yet? I'm considering

Pentax 15mm F/4 SMC DA ED AL Limited

Anyone try this on a K1 yet? I'm considering getting myself a late Christmas present. How badly does it vignette? If it's not too bad, I could probably "fix" it in Camera Raw. An alternative might be the Pentax HD PENTAX-D FA 15-30mm f/2.8 ED SDM WR, which would have roughly the same field of

Re: K-1 and 77 Limited

> On 02 December 2016 at 21:41 Mark Roberts wrote: > > > So Lisa and I made our traditional hiking trip to the White Mountains > in New Hampshire over Thanksgiving. I didn't get a huge number of > keepers but it was a nice trip anyway. We hiked up Mt Tom (4050 ft) >

Re: K-1 and 77 Limited

Wow. You must have really sharp birds. - Marco > On Dec 3, 2016, at 3:03 AM, Jack Davis wrote: > > Nice detail! > > J > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Dec 2, 2016, at 8:45 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: >> >> Excellent! Those birds are well trained!

Re: K-1 and 77 Limited

Paul Stenquist wrote: >Excellent! Those birds are well trained! Mine lose it if I breathe from 30 >feet away. There was a pair that followed us about a quarter of a mile down from the top of the mountain. They literally ate out of the palms of our hands. The one in the photo is a smaller one

Re: K-1 and 77 Limited

wow On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: > So Lisa and I made our traditional hiking trip to the White Mountains > in New Hampshire over Thanksgiving. I didn't get a huge number of > keepers but it was a nice trip anyway. We hiked up Mt Tom (4050 ft) >

Re: K-1 and 77 Limited

Nice detail! J Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 2, 2016, at 8:45 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > > Excellent! Those birds are well trained! Mine lose it if I breathe from 30 > feet away. > > Paul via phone > >> On Dec 2, 2016, at 11:41 PM, Larry Colen wrote:

Re: K-1 and 77 Limited

Excellent! Those birds are well trained! Mine lose it if I breathe from 30 feet away. Paul via phone > On Dec 2, 2016, at 11:41 PM, Larry Colen wrote: > > K-1 + FA77 is a damned hard combination to beat at what it is good at. > > Mark Roberts wrote: >> So Lisa and I made

Re: K-1 and 77 Limited

K-1 + FA77 is a damned hard combination to beat at what it is good at. Mark Roberts wrote: So Lisa and I made our traditional hiking trip to the White Mountains in New Hampshire over Thanksgiving. I didn't get a huge number of keepers but it was a nice trip anyway. We hiked up Mt Tom (4050 ft)

Re: K-1 and 77 Limited

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Malcolm Smith wrote: > And now here's a crop at 100% magnification Impressive! Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

RE: K-1 and 77 Limited

Mark Roberts wrote: And now here's a crop at 100% magnification. No sharpening. http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7e005336crop.jpg Wow! That is sharp. Malcolm -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE

K-1 and 77 Limited

So Lisa and I made our traditional hiking trip to the White Mountains in New Hampshire over Thanksgiving. I didn't get a huge number of keepers but it was a nice trip anyway. We hiked up Mt Tom (4050 ft) and found quite a lot of the birds were well habituated to human presence; they were obviously

Re: Tight 40 mm Limited

en ignoring PDML for quite a while. >> But I’ve discovered a new game- read the threads newest first. You find gems >> like this- >> >> 'Thanks. A giraffe is always good. I’ve never seen a picture that included >> a giraffe that led me to say, “The giraffe is spoiling t

Re: Tight 40 mm Limited

the picture.” You guys suckered me in again... BTW: My 40mm Limited has gotten very stiff at the close focus end of travel. Stiff enough that it stalls autofocus. Is this a common problem? Where can I get it fixed? Cheers Mike -- I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want

Tight 40 mm Limited

.” You guys suckered me in again... BTW: My 40mm Limited has gotten very stiff at the close focus end of travel. Stiff enough that it stalls autofocus. Is this a common problem? Where can I get it fixed? Cheers Mike -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo

Re: For Sale Friday: 77/1.8 Limited, Sigma 150-500, 645 A Series lenses and bits and bobs

ng some A and some FA > lenses. I later decided that FA was the way to go. So I have 3 645 A lenses. > > In addition, in preparing for the K-1 I bought a 2nd FA* 24/2.0 and a second > FA 77u/1.8 Limited. Back story on the 24/2 and 77/1.8 at the bottom of this > message. >

For Sale Friday: 77/1.8 Limited, Sigma 150-500, 645 A Series lenses and bits and bobs

bought a 2nd FA* 24/2.0 and a second FA 77u/1.8 Limited. Back story on the 24/2 and 77/1.8 at the bottom of this message. Lenses and suggested prices below. Contact me if you would like to discuss further. 645 A 45/2.8 $125 http://photos.stanhalpin.com/p269753714/h725a7054#h7a79fabc 645

Re: Pentax marketing: Really crappy sample images of Limited lenses

amazed at how poor the Ricoh/Pentax >> marketing is. Case in point: >> >> Here is a page with 4 Limited lenses. Take a look at the Sample Images >> shown for each of the 4 lenses: >> http://www.ricoh-imaging.co.jp/japan/products/lens_cmp2/page04.html >> (the link goes t

Re: Pentax marketing: Really crappy sample images of Limited lenses

and crappy engineering I would certainly take the former... but I continue to be amazed at how poor the Ricoh/Pentax marketing is. Case in point: Here is a page with 4 Limited lenses. Take a look at the Sample Images shown for each of the 4 lenses: http://www.ricoh-imaging.co.jp/japan/products/lens_cmp2

Pentax marketing: Really crappy sample images of Limited lenses

in point: Here is a page with 4 Limited lenses. Take a look at the Sample Images shown for each of the 4 lenses: http://www.ricoh-imaging.co.jp/japan/products/lens_cmp2/page04.html (the link goes to the 70mm f/2.4, but you can change the URL to page03, page02, page01 (or simply click the link

Re: A side-by-side Pixel Shift Resolution comparison with 77mm Limited atf/11

easily remedy any aberrations that were introduced by subject movement. I understand the theory but I think that there is way too much emphasis put on the limited advantage leveraged by the PSR tech, scaling down an image from a larger sensor will yield similar results. The sample you provided a link

Re: A side-by-side Pixel Shift Resolution comparison with 77mm Limited atf/11

t's subtle but it's there, whether it's going to make a discernible > difference in a print for instance depends on crop size vs print size > I guess but it's a tool with very limited scope from my perspective > given the artifacts created when there is any movement in the frame. > > I h

Re: A side-by-side Pixel Shift Resolution comparison with 77mm Limited atf/11

It's subtle but it's there, whether it's going to make a discernible difference in a print for instance depends on crop size vs print size I guess but it's a tool with very limited scope from my perspective given the artifacts created when there is any movement in the frame. I have yet to test

Re: A side-by-side Pixel Shift Resolution comparison with 77mm Limited atf/11

List Subject: A side-by-side Pixel Shift Resolution comparison with 77mm Limited atf/11 My K-3II arrived today and so I had to try out the Pixel Shift Resolution during afternoon break. Found an obliging dusty rack of electrical wire that agreed to serve as my subject. The 77mm f/1.8 limited

Re: A side-by-side Pixel Shift Resolution comparison with 77mm Limited atf/11

Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: A side-by-side Pixel Shift Resolution comparison with 77mm Limited atf/11 My K-3II arrived today and so I had to try out the Pixel Shift Resolution during afternoon break. Found an obliging dusty rack of electrical wire that agreed to serve as my subject. The 77mm

Re: A side-by-side Pixel Shift Resolution comparison with 77mm Limited atf/11

esolution comparison with 77mm Limited atf/11 My K-3II arrived today and so I had to try out the Pixel Shift Resolution during afternoon break. Found an obliging dusty rack of electrical wire that agreed to serve as my subject. The 77mm f/1.8 limited is a very sharp lens (as anyone who has one will tell

Re: A side-by-side Pixel Shift Resolution comparison with 77mm Limited atf/11

> Am I missing something? Can't see a difference. > Alan C > Ditto >Kenneth Waller I had to study it for a while. Looking at the pitting on the column the edges are a bit sharper. Note also that white dot on the right edge of the column, to the right of the axle. It's not like you're going to

Re: A side-by-side Pixel Shift Resolution comparison with 77mm Limited at f/11

My intent in showing the side by side comparison is not to make anyone unhappy with their current equipment. Heaven knows that I believe that very cool images can be created with ANY camera of ANY kind of technology all the way down to a plastic Holga or home made pinhole camera. You can have a

Re: A side-by-side Pixel Shift Resolution comparison with 77mm Limited atf/11

C -Original Message- From: Darren Addy Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 11:04 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: A side-by-side Pixel Shift Resolution comparison with 77mm Limited atf/11 My K-3II arrived today and so I had to try out the Pixel Shift Resolution during afternoon

Re: A side-by-side Pixel Shift Resolution comparison with 77mm Limited at f/11

Darren Addy wrote: My K-3II arrived today and so I had to try out the Pixel Shift Resolution during afternoon break. Found an obliging dusty rack of electrical wire that agreed to serve as my subject. The 77mm f/1.8 limited is a very sharp lens (as anyone who has one will tell you). What you

Re: A side-by-side Pixel Shift Resolution comparison with 77mm Limited atf/11

On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 07:43:08AM -0400, Collin B wrote: > > Am I missing something? Can't see a difference. > > Alan C > > > Ditto > >Kenneth Waller > > I had to study it for a while. Looking at the pitting on the column the > edges are a bit sharper. Note also that white dot on the right

Re: A side-by-side Pixel Shift Resolution comparison with 77mm Limited atf/11

gt; >> On 10/23/2015 12:01 AM, Alan C wrote: >>> >>> Am I missing something? Can't see a difference. >>> >>> Alan C >>> >>> -Original Message- From: Darren Addy >>> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 11:04 PM >>> To: Pen

A side-by-side Pixel Shift Resolution comparison with 77mm Limited at f/11

My K-3II arrived today and so I had to try out the Pixel Shift Resolution during afternoon break. Found an obliging dusty rack of electrical wire that agreed to serve as my subject. The 77mm f/1.8 limited is a very sharp lens (as anyone who has one will tell you). What you see in the link below

Re: A side-by-side Pixel Shift Resolution comparison with 77mm Limited atf/11

Am I missing something? Can't see a difference. Alan C -Original Message- From: Darren Addy Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 11:04 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: A side-by-side Pixel Shift Resolution comparison with 77mm Limited atf/11 My K-3II arrived today and so I had

Re: A side-by-side Pixel Shift Resolution comparison with 77mm Limited at f/11

g dusty rack of > electrical wire that agreed to serve as my subject. The 77mm f/1.8 > limited is a very sharp lens (as anyone who has one will tell you). > > What you see in the link below is an image blown up to 100% (actual > pixels). Each is an 863 pixel x 994 pixel crop of the ful

Re: A side-by-side Pixel Shift Resolution comparison with 77mm Limited at f/11

y <pixelsmi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> My K-3II arrived today and so I had to try out the Pixel Shift >> Resolution during afternoon break. Found an obliging dusty rack of >> electrical wire that agreed to serve as my subject. The 77mm f/1.8 >> limited is a very sharp lens (as

Re: A side-by-side Pixel Shift Resolution comparison with 77mm Limited at f/11

Darren, can you please enlighten me and indicate - what size of print would be necessary for the common viewer to look at it and say - "hmmm, I think that this picture is more pleasant to look at than that one"? Naturally, I don't mean to say that the new technology does not better the old

Ricoh Imaging (USA) redesigned web site shows very limited lens line up.

As in very few lenses. Stupidly organized as well by the way. Really if I'm interested in K mount DSLRs and click on the lenses link, you'd think they'd filter by only K mount lenses, but no, you get a listing that includes all the lenses, such as they are. Either they're dropping a lot of

Re: PESO - Limited View

I love that! Also, your PUG this month is my fave ann On 8/7/2015 9:43 PM, Rick Womer wrote: The last in the UK series for now: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18049307size=lg (K-5, DA 16-45) Comments appreciated. Rick -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: PESO - Limited View

Gee, thanks folks! One never knows which photos will grab people. Rick http://photo.net/photos/RickW On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 9:30 AM, ann sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote: I love that! Also, your PUG this month is my fave ann On 8/7/2015 9:43 PM, Rick Womer wrote: The last in the UK

Re: PESO - Limited View

Wowsers, RICK! This is perfect in every way. I have the feeling we will be seeing this one in next year's Annual. Love wisteria and your composition and rendering are spot on. On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Rick Womer rickpic...@gmail.com wrote: The last in the UK series for now:

Re: PESO - Limited View

To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: PESO - Limited View The last in the UK series for now: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18049307size=lg (K-5, DA 16-45) Comments appreciated. Rick -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: PESO - Limited View

On Aug 7, 2015, at 9:43 PM, Rick Womer rickpic...@gmail.com wrote: The last in the UK series for now: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18049307size=lg I missed the earlier ones. This one’s lovely—and interesting. I go with what Frank said.

Re: PESO - Limited View

Dramatic shot, very nicely rendered, Rick! J - Original Message - From: Rick Womer rickpic...@gmail.com To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Sent: Friday, August 7, 2015 6:43:11 PM Subject: PESO - Limited View The last in the UK series for now: http://photo.net/photodb/photo

Re: PESO - Limited View

They're related. Mass wysteria erupted when Dennis Moore brought in one bundle of lupins too many. On Aug 7, 2015, at 11:06 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote: It's certainly a nice scene. That's mass wisteria, Frank. Lupins grow from the ground up, which is why they are so easily gathered and

Re: PESO - Limited View

Lovely! On 8/7/2015 9:43 PM, Rick Womer wrote: The last in the UK series for now: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18049307size=lg (K-5, DA 16-45) Comments appreciated. Rick --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com --

Re: PESO - Limited View

On 8/7/2015 9:43 PM, Rick Womer wrote: The last in the UK series for now: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18049307size=lg (K-5, DA 16-45) Comments appreciated. Rick A fairly delightful way of limiting the view. -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion -

PESO - Limited View

The last in the UK series for now: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18049307size=lg (K-5, DA 16-45) Comments appreciated. Rick -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly

Re: PESO - Limited View

Wow, you saved your best for last! Certainly among my faves from this series. Beautiful colours, very well composed, interesting subject matter and so very, very English. By the way, I'm no botanist, but could this have possibly been titled, Your Lupins or your Life? ;-) Cheers, frank On 7

Re: PESO - Limited View

It's certainly a nice scene. That's mass wisteria, Frank. Lupins grow from the ground up, which is why they are so easily gathered and transported to peasants' hovels. B On 8 Aug 2015, at 03:32, Knarf knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote: Wow, you saved your best for last! Certainly among my

Re: PESO - Limited View

Mass wisteria. I learned something new today. Thanks! Cheers, frank On 7 August, 2015 11:06:55 PM EDT, Bob W-PDML p...@web-options.com wrote: It's certainly a nice scene. That's mass wisteria, Frank. Lupins grow from the ground up, which is why they are so easily gathered and transported to

Re: PESO - Limited View

I love the wysteria!. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Rick Womer rickpic...@gmail.com wrote: The last in the UK series for now: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18049307size=lg (K-5, DA 16-45) Comments appreciated.

Re: K-3II announcement and new FA Limited primes coming...

The clip on Pentax GPS is brilliant :-) But of course it's more convenient to have it built in. Also, it prevents the use of other hot shoe equipment, such as a remote trigger. I seriously consider getting the K-3II - or should I wait for the Full Frame body to appear ? Regards Jens Den

PESO with the 77mm Limited

Haven't had an abundance of opportunity to use my recently procured FA77 but it was the perfect focal length for this shot, taken on Monday. Of course I'm using it at f/11, where most every lens should perform at its best, but I was still pretty amazed at its incredible sharpness (paired with the

Re: PESO with the 77mm Limited

A sharp, beautiful conversion, Darren! J - Original Message - From: Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 5:47:37 AM Subject: PESO with the 77mm Limited Haven't had an abundance of opportunity to use my recently

Re: PESO with the 77mm Limited

A great take on the subject ! Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com Subject: PESO with the 77mm Limited Haven't had an abundance of opportunity to use my recently procured FA77

Re: K-3II announcement and new FA Limited primes coming...

It is possible, assuming that the flash would only use 25% of full manual power on the 4 consecutive shots. However, if you are taking a studio portrait, I think we can pretty much assume that the last three pixel shifts will capture the subject with their eyes closed. (Only half joking there).

Re: K-3II announcement and new FA Limited primes coming...

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 01:33:44PM -0600, steve harley wrote: On 2015-04-24 6:25 , Darren Addy wrote: It is possible, assuming that the flash would only use 25% of full manual power on the 4 consecutive shots. i would think each of the 4 exposures would require the nominal amount of flash,

Re: K-3II announcement and new FA Limited primes coming...

On 2015-04-24 6:25 , Darren Addy wrote: It is possible, assuming that the flash would only use 25% of full manual power on the 4 consecutive shots. i would think each of the 4 exposures would require the nominal amount of flash, as you'd need a good histogram on each of them to get the best

Re: K-3II announcement and new FA Limited primes coming...

I don't see why you think this means it won't work with flash. I'd expect the camera to be quite capable of triggering the flash each time it 'opens' the electronic shutter. And, as I point out, any high speed sync capable flash is capable of being triggered multiple times during the 1/180 sec

Re: K-3II announcement and new FA Limited primes coming...

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 05:35:59AM -0400, Glen Berry wrote: Yeah, in the other K-3 II thread, I had mentioned this myself. I suppose they could do something where each of the four sub-exposures gets 1/4 of the total flash power, with the flash firing a total of 4 times for each

Re: K-3II announcement and new FA Limited primes coming...

I don't think this (the pixel shift resolution) is going to work with flash period. The pixel shift resolution is not using the focal plane shutter for anything more than opening and closing the window. The 4 exposures taken while that window are open will be done by electronic shutter (basically

Re: K-3II announcement and new FA Limited primes coming...

-Messaggio originale- From: Larry Colen Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 11:12 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: K-3II announcement and new FA Limited primes coming... Glen Berry wrote: Since we're only talking about a senor shift of one pixel, would a little subject movement

RE: K-3II announcement and new FA Limited primes coming...

. Alling Sent: Wednesday, 22 April 2015 9:39 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: K-3II announcement and new FA Limited primes coming... Had not seen that view before, so Pentax is putting the GPS module where the pop up flash used to be. On the other hand Canon removes the built in GPS from

Re: K-3II announcement and new FA Limited primes coming...

Am 23.04.15 um 08:51 schrieb John Coyle: I guess it's one of those features that's great to have when you really need it, but not much missed otherwise. I've been tagging my photos using a Garmin hand-held and Houdah Geo for a number of years now. My main use is in Lightroom to find all

Re: K-3II announcement and new FA Limited primes coming...

Glen Berry wrote: Since we're only talking about a senor shift of one pixel, would a little subject movement necessarily ruin your shot? I'd think in many cases, the resulting quality wouldn't be that much different than shooting a normal image without the resolution enhancement turned on.

Re: K-3II announcement and new FA Limited primes coming...

Yeah, in the other K-3 II thread, I had mentioned this myself. I suppose they could do something where each of the four sub-exposures gets 1/4 of the total flash power, with the flash firing a total of 4 times for each resolution-enhanced image. For TTL flash, that would probably require a

Re: K-3II announcement and new FA Limited primes coming...

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 01:46:23AM -0400, John Francis wrote: On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:46:59PM -0700, Larry Colen wrote: What would be really nifty would be the option of getting all three or four low resolution raw files in addition to the superresolution final file, on the off chance

Re: K-3II announcement and new FA Limited primes coming...

and new FA Limited primes coming... Glen Berry wrote: Since we're only talking about a senor shift of one pixel, would a little subject movement necessarily ruin your shot? I'd think in many cases, the resulting quality wouldn't be that much different than shooting a normal image without

Re: K-3II announcement and new FA Limited primes coming...

If I had the new K-3 II, I wouldn't miss the pop-up flash at all. I generally use either hot shoe flashes or monolights when I need flash. Speaking of hot shoes, this new internal GPS unit won't tie up your hot shoe like the older external model does. Using both GPS and a hot shoe flash at the

Re: K-3II announcement and new FA Limited primes coming...

Since we're only talking about a senor shift of one pixel, would a little subject movement necessarily ruin your shot? I'd think in many cases, the resulting quality wouldn't be that much different than shooting a normal image without the resolution enhancement turned on. On 4/23/2015 4:31

RE: K-3II announcement and new FA Limited primes coming..(price)

I've had an e-mail in from one of the UK dealers stating the body only option is £769, which is better than I thought it would be launched at. Malcolm -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the

Re: K-3II announcement and new FA Limited primes coming..(price)

BH has it for pre-order for $1100 IIRC. Malcolm Smith wrote: I've had an e-mail in from one of the UK dealers stating the body only option is £769, which is better than I thought it would be launched at. Malcolm -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est) -- PDML

Re: K-3II announcement and new FA Limited primes coming...

hit one exposure out of four. This has to be investigated. Dario -Messaggio originale- From: Larry Colen Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 11:12 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: K-3II announcement and new FA Limited primes coming... Glen Berry wrote: Since we're only talking

Re: K-3II announcement and new FA Limited primes coming...

Darren Addy wrote: I don't think this (the pixel shift resolution) is going to work with flash period. The pixel shift resolution is not using the focal plane shutter for anything more than opening and closing the window. The 4 exposures taken while that window are open will be done by

Re: K-3II announcement and new FA Limited primes coming...

Darren Addy wrote: I don't think it is much of a stretch to say that if you are interested in super-resolution you are already using a tripod, just as back in the day you used a tripod and shot with the mirror locked up when you wanted super sharpness. In addition, as I mentioned (and was

Re: K-3II announcement and new FA Limited primes coming...

On 22/04/2015 6:33 AM, P.J. Alling wrote: I'm pretty sure that the Ricoh implementation needs a static subject and a tripod as well. From what I've been able to find out, the Pentax version of pixel shifting works somewhat differently from Olympus. The Olympus moves the sensor to enable a

Re: K-3II announcement and new FA Limited primes coming...

I'm pretty sure that the Ricoh implementation needs a static subject and a tripod as well. On 4/22/2015 5:27 AM, Brian Walters wrote: Quoting Malcolm Smith rrve...@virginmedia.com: Ralf R Radermacher wrote: ...and built-in GPS. Not enough to make me flog off my K-3 and buy the K-3 II but

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >