For Sale (Black) Friday: Pentax 67 with 57mm f/4.5 lens

My old faithful 67 just doesn't get enough use to justify keeping it around these days. Looking for a loving home. $500.00 + shipping for camera body and lens. Includes non-metered prism as shown (it's obviously dented and apparently has a chip in the prism somewhere, but it can't be seen through

Re: Pentax 67 pentaprism issue

I'm not exactly sure how the 6x7 pentaprism is constructed, but if there's some kind of corrector glued to the bottom the way lens elements are sometimes glued together, it might be something that's got into the glue. "Bugs" don't eat glass, but they will eat glue. On 12/8/2016 1:06 PM, Gonz

Re: Pentax 67 pentaprism issue

It looks a little symmetrical to me because it is right where the top edge of the prism is. When looked at closely, it appears like little trails left behind by a burrowing insect, but of course insects do not burrow in glass (that I know of). On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Collin B

Re: Pentax 67 pentaprism issue

Fungus looks more symmetrical. That looks like lint to me. Too much sense of depth to the smaller piece. Assuming that it is lint ... Check the focusing screen. If that's not it then remove the focusing screen and try a light poof of air to blow it out. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List

Re: Pentax 67 pentaprism issue

Not so sure it is fungus. Have you seen the movie "Arrival"? Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7W1m5ER3I1Y On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Gonz wrote: > Its smack in the middle of the view and the bulk of it appears > black(opaque) when trying to compose a pic. > >

Re: Pentax 67 pentaprism issue

Its smack in the middle of the view and the bulk of it appears black(opaque) when trying to compose a pic. On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:47 PM, P.J. Alling wrote: > It looks like an alien life form, maybe a WotW martian. Annoying really. > > On 12/5/2016 8:23 PM, Gonz

Re: Pentax 67 pentaprism issue

It looks like an alien life form, maybe a WotW martian. Annoying really. On 12/5/2016 8:23 PM, Gonz wrote: Fungus? Can I clean this? Help! https://www.flickr.com/photos/66982297@N02/30640299923/in/dateposted-public/ -- There is not enough Coffee in Columbia to make me a morning person.

Re: Pentax 67 pentaprism issue

Are there any tricks or hidden parts to worry about when disassembling the housing for the prism? On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > Yeah, it's probably just debris. Clean it with some ROR and a microfiber rag. > > Paul via phone > >> On Dec 6, 2016,

Re: Pentax 67 pentaprism issue

Yeah, it's probably just debris. Clean it with some ROR and a microfiber rag. Paul via phone > On Dec 6, 2016, at 12:33 AM, Bulent Celasun wrote: > > It looks rather too big and surprisingly symmetrical for a fungus. > If so, that can be cleaned easier and hopefully

Re: Pentax 67 pentaprism issue

It looks rather too big and surprisingly symmetrical for a fungus. If so, that can be cleaned easier and hopefully with no permanent damage. Bulent - http://patoloji.gen.tr http://celasun.wordpress.com/

Re: Pentax 67 pentaprism issue

Looks like it. Sunlight or hard UV to kill it. Normal lens tissue to remove the organic material afterwards. There will always be a mark, though, and not the interesting or amusing kind. > On 06 December 2016 at 01:23 Gonz wrote: > > > Fungus? Can I clean this?

Pentax 67 pentaprism issue

Fungus? Can I clean this? Help! https://www.flickr.com/photos/66982297@N02/30640299923/in/dateposted-public/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the

Re: Cool architectural photography. Pentax 67, I think.

On 2016-02-22 9:41 , knarf wrote: Cool photos, but brutalist architecture has got to be the ugliest crime perpetrated by architecture against cities in the 20th Century. i enjoyed the shots Mark linked, but didn't actually get a strong sense for the buildings; i do have a soft spot for

Re: Cool architectural photography. Pentax 67, I think.

Cool photos, but brutalist architecture has got to be the ugliest crime perpetrated by architecture against cities in the 20th Century. Toronto was in the midst of a huge boom during the late sixties through to the end of the seventies, the heyday of brutalism. Grey concrete abounds in this

Re: Cool architectural photography. Pentax 67, I think.

my Pentax 67. -- Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia www.robertstech.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Cool architectural photography. Pentax 67, I think.

http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/gallery/2016/feb/22/building-the-brutal-barbican-peter-bloomfield -- Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia www.robertstech.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the

FS Friday: Lensbaby 3G for Pentax 67 Medium Format

http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/for-sale-friday-7-10?blog=9 These are very scarce and this one is in like new condition. I used it just a few times. I believe that with an adapter it can be used with the 645D or Z, but have not tested it. (Would gladly do so if someone would

Pentax sighting #2: Pentax 67 105mm f2.4

Drew English: Photographing Strangers With a Pentax 67 http://www.thephoblographer.com/2015/05/02/drew-english-photographing-strangers-pentax-67/ -- Life is too short to put up with bad bokeh. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Paris through Pentax 67 viewfinder

This was posted on FB. That viewfinder sure looks great! http://www.thephoblographer.com/2014/08/25/see-paris-gorgeous-pentax-67-viewfinder -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly

Re: Paris through Pentax 67 viewfinder

On 25/08/2014 3:19 PM, Attila Boros wrote: This was posted on FB. That viewfinder sure looks great! http://www.thephoblographer.com/2014/08/25/see-paris-gorgeous-pentax-67-viewfinder By coincidence, I could make someone who wants to view the world through a 6x7 viewfinder very happy

Re: Paris through Pentax 67 viewfinder

On Aug 25, 2014, at 5:19 PM, Attila Boros attila.p...@gmail.com wrote: This was posted on FB. That viewfinder sure looks great! http://www.thephoblographer.com/2014/08/25/see-paris-gorgeous-pentax-67-viewfinder Cool

Re: Paris through Pentax 67 viewfinder

On 8/25/2014 6:11 PM, Bill wrote: On 25/08/2014 3:19 PM, Attila Boros wrote: This was posted on FB. That viewfinder sure looks great! http://www.thephoblographer.com/2014/08/25/see-paris-gorgeous-pentax-67-viewfinder By coincidence, I could make someone who wants to view the world

Re: Paris through Pentax 67 viewfinder

On 25/08/2014 6:57 PM, P.J. Alling wrote: On 8/25/2014 6:11 PM, Bill wrote: On 25/08/2014 3:19 PM, Attila Boros wrote: This was posted on FB. That viewfinder sure looks great! http://www.thephoblographer.com/2014/08/25/see-paris-gorgeous-pentax-67-viewfinder By coincidence, I could make

Re: Paris through Pentax 67 viewfinder

On 8/25/2014 5:19 PM, Attila Boros wrote: This was posted on FB. That viewfinder sure looks great! http://www.thephoblographer.com/2014/08/25/see-paris-gorgeous-pentax-67-viewfinder Cool - the original Live View mode! (No focus peaking though...) Mark -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML

Re: Paris through Pentax 67 viewfinder

/2014/08/25/see-paris-gorgeous-pentax-67-viewfinder By coincidence, I could make someone who wants to view the world through a 6x7 viewfinder very happy. But alas, it seems no one wants to be happy. bill I'm sorry but I can't afford to be happy. You would be surprised at how

Bizarre: Twenty Four Pentax 67 45mm f4 (NEW) on Amazon?

I can understand maybe finding one or two of these new (old stock) lenses on Amazon, but 24 of them? And each one from a different Ships from Japan seller? I don't get it. Some of these sellers with low feedback are probably just opening new Amazon accounts to sell under (which accounts for at

Re: Bizarre: Twenty Four Pentax 67 45mm f4 (NEW) on Amazon?

Looks like Pentax is holding auctions of warehoused new-old stock lenses. Ricoh tired of paying to warehouse stuff they'll never bother to sell through normal channels. Expect more. Joe On Aug 22, 2013, at 15:03 , Darren Addy wrote: I can understand maybe finding one or two of these new

Re: Bizarre: Twenty Four Pentax 67 45mm f4 (NEW) on Amazon?

On 22/08/2013 4:03 PM, Darren Addy wrote: I can understand maybe finding one or two of these new (old stock) lenses on Amazon, but 24 of them? And each one from a different Ships from Japan seller? I don't get it. Some of these sellers with low feedback are probably just opening new Amazon

Re: Bizarre: Twenty Four Pentax 67 45mm f4 (NEW) on Amazon?

I bought a well used (brassing on the outside) 400mm f4 before the *ist D first came out for somewhere under $350 on ebay. I had shopped carefully and watched, and was pissed the next week when somebody offered a much better looking one for the same price. I'm shocked to see those prices now. You

Using Pentax 67 lenses on K-mount bodies?

I have noticed that used lenses in longer focal lengths (e.g., 600mm) are more available and with more manageable prices in Pentax 67 mounts than K-mount. I know it is feasible to use the 67 (or 645) lenses on my K-5ii with adapter. I would imagine at that point I would have a totally manual

Re: Using Pentax 67 lenses on K-mount bodies?

lenses in longer focal lengths (e.g., 600mm) are more available and with more manageable prices in Pentax 67 mounts than K-mount. I know it is feasible to use the 67 (or 645) lenses on my K-5ii with adapter. I would imagine at that point I would have a totally manual lens which might be worth

Re: Using Pentax 67 lenses on K-mount bodies?

, Stan Halpin s...@stans-photography.info wrote: I have noticed that used lenses in longer focal lengths (e.g., 600mm) are more available and with more manageable prices in Pentax 67 mounts than K-mount. I know it is feasible to use the 67 (or 645) lenses on my K-5ii with adapter. I would

Re: Fun with a 'Pentax 67'

Thats about the size of mine.:-) Dave On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org wrote: Sort of http://www.petapixel.com/2012/04/09/quirky-camera-head-photographs/ -- Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney

Re: Fun with a 'Pentax 67'

On 17 April 2012 18:40, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote: Thats about the size of mine.:-) Dave Surely they just found a load of people with small heads? Chris On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org wrote: Sort of

Re: Fun with a 'Pentax 67'

Thats about the size of mine.:-) A MARK ! if ever I've seen one. Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Fun with a 'Pentax 67' Thats about the size of mine.:-) Dave On Mon, Apr 16

Fun with a 'Pentax 67'

Sort of http://www.petapixel.com/2012/04/09/quirky-camera-head-photographs/ -- Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

RE: Fun with a 'Pentax 67'

-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Subject: Fun with a 'Pentax 67' Sort of http://www.petapixel.com/2012/04/09/quirky-camera-head-photographs/ -- Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ -- PDML Pentax

Re: Fun with a 'Pentax 67'

These are *my* kind of people. : ) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: Pentax 67

, and many of you have already seen some of her footage in the reportage of the event over the past ten years. The man, who had been asleep when she woke him up, cleared his head and picked up his Pentax 67. It's not that life is too short, it's that you're dead for so long.. — Anon

Re: Pentax 67

On Sep 6, 2011, at 17:34 , Joseph McAllister wrote: Noe Dewitt, a fashion photographer and resident of lower Manhattan was the person who took the photos with the 67II and a Polaroid 600E. His girlfriend was Kerrie, an art director. I spent four hours trying to get a look at Noe's images,

Re: Pentax 67

Looking at these more closely as I prepped them for upload to my gallery, I see that he took TWO (2) photos of the tower collapsing, the second one fuzzy as he backed up to get away. Then the editor for the Smithsonian special made three images from the good one by cropping. Then threw in some

Re: Pentax 67

Thanks Joe. Bob S. On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com wrote: Looking at these more closely as I prepped them for upload to my gallery, I see that he took TWO (2) photos of the tower collapsing, the second one fuzzy as he backed up to get away. Then the

Re: Pentax 67

camera, and many of you have already seen some of her footage in the reportage of the event over the past ten years. The man, who had been asleep when she woke him up, cleared his head and picked up his Pentax 67. Tonight on a program on the Smithsonian called 9/11 Stories in Fragments

Re: Pentax 67

the first plane hit the towers. The woman had a Sony Hi-8 camera, and many of you have already seen some of her footage in the reportage of the event over the past ten years. The man, who had been asleep when she woke him up, cleared his head and picked up his Pentax 67. Tonight on a program

Re: Pentax 67

asleep when she woke him up, cleared his head and picked up his Pentax 67. It's not that life is too short, it's that you're dead for so long.. — Anon Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com http://gallery.me.com/jomac -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net

Pentax 67

. The man, who had been asleep when she woke him up, cleared his head and picked up his Pentax 67. Tonight on a program on the Smithsonian called 9/11 Stories in Fragments they tell a story of all the events that we know so well that day tying them together with objects that the Smithsonian

Enablement: Pentax 67, 55mm F4, latest model

Yes - I got a good ebay deal on the famous 55mm f4 for my Pentax 67. Very nice :-) At PentaxForums.com it's rated 10 by most people :-) And i finally got around to buying a Manfrotto 322RC2 head. Man, that's nice: http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157625905382599/ Regards Jens -- Treat

RE: Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

I can't remember whether you had an E-3 or went straight from the E-1 to the E-5. If you had an E-3, do you think the E-5 has major advantages over it? I was planning to buy an E-3 when the E-5 came out, to take advantage of remainder pricing, etc. But the more I looked at it, the more

Re: Re: Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

. I'm sure the Pentax 67 is a wonderful tool for acquiring images. I frequently miss shooting with the 645Nii, but never get around to actually loading it with film. I remember I tried to consider the cost of the Pentax *istD against my expenses for film an processing, and concluded that I

Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

, that judging the quality/resolution/sharpness of my Pentax 67 images, will very much depend on which scanner I will be using for scanning my P67 negs and slides. I will soon receive the Velvia, Astia and Ektar films from the lab - all exposed through the shutter of a Pentax 67. I will let you know

Re: Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

, as the price tags seemed to drop a lot, I got a nice deal on a Pentax 67 + 2.8 90mm lens, a few weeks ago. Aftewards I have bought a Pentax 300mm and a Pentax 4.0 165mm LS lens for flash photography. Now I only miss a 45mm or 55mm :-) So, I'm selliong my Pentacon Six equipment shortly The first

RE: Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

I occasionally get nostalgic and think I want to work with film again. Then I shoot a roll of film, have it processed, and work through the scanning business. After that, and after I look at the photos the process creates, I put the film camera away until the next time I feel nostalgic.

Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 5:13 AM, Gasha cir...@konts.lv wrote: Pentax 67 takes a lot more time to shoot. If you walk around with your friens, you can shoot something with digital SLR. In contrast, when you walk with Pentax 67 (and tripod), you cannot take your friends with you :) Gasha

Re: Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote: I occasionally get nostalgic and think I want to work with film again. Then I shoot a roll of film, have it processed, and work through the scanning business. After that, and after I look at the photos the process

Re: Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote: I'll be going for a walk soon and will carry ... the Olympus E-5. ... I can't remember whether you had an E-3 or went straight from the E-1 to the E-5. If you had an E-3, do you think the E-5 has major advantages over it? I was

Re: Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

2011/1/2 AlunFoto alunf...@gmail.com: I frequently miss shooting with the 645Nii, but never get around to actually loading it with film. Let me know when the dust gets too thick to manage ]=) Ecke -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

Pentax 67 takes a lot more time to shoot. If you walk around with your friens, you can shoot something with digital SLR. In contrast, when you walk with Pentax 67 (and tripod), you cannot take your friends with you :) Gasha Jens wrote: Good point Godfrey. To me is more an economical

Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

Jens wrote: But more important: 2. I just can't seem to learn how to compose square images Have you considered composing in portrait orientation? Ecke -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the

Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

On 3/1/11, eckinator, discombobulated, unleashed: Have you considered composing in portrait orientation? Filthy bugger!! -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche -- http://www.cottysnaps.com _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss

Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

It's definitely not legal in Alabama. It may go by county in VA. On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:12 PM, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote: On 1/2/2011 1:32 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote: Try shooting the K7 through a pair of pantyhose. That's not legal in Virginia.  ;-) You sure you

Re: Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

He, he... I meant to say 6x6 isn't the format for me. I want a rectangular viewfinder and rectangular images - most of the time. Regards Jens -- Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself. On Jan 3, 2011 12:21 eckinator eckina...@gmail.com wrote: Jens wrote: But more

Re: Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

to drop a lot, I got a nice deal on a Pentax 67 + 2.8 90mm lens, a few weeks ago. Aftewards I have bought a Pentax 300mm and a Pentax 4.0 165mm LS lens for flash photography. Now I only miss a 45mm or 55mm :-) So, I'm selliong my Pentacon Six equipment shortly The first reason I got a Pentax 67

Re: Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

of the finest Pentax'es ever). Regards jens -- Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself. On Dec 31, 2010 22:08 Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote: Jens wrote: Hello list I'm getting into photographing with Pentax 67. BTW: I just got the SMC 1:4 165 mm Leaf Shutter lens for studio

Re: Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

They still make imacon scanners (I believe they were Danish actually)? Jens -- Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself. On Jan 1, 2011 20:32 paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: On Jan 1, 2011, at 2:27 PM, Jens wrote: I'm not sure Paul, but since it a studio recording

Re: Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

From: Jens Thank you all for you rinterest in responding and answering my question. I have done some samll tests, that didin't turn out too well. But I was using old film and a questionable lab for developing. My result is shown at flickr. I photographed a sitting girl (in full figure) filling

Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

2010/12/31 J.C. O'Connell hifis...@gate.net: MF or LF on a light table rules! Give me a side by side comparson of MF film and a digital capture on your light table, and I might believe you. :-) -- http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/ http://alunfoto.blogspot.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List

Re: Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

2011/1/2 Jens p...@planfoto.dk: They still make imacon scanners  (I believe they were Danish actually)? Jens The Imacon scanners are now sold as Hasselblad Flextight scanners. They're more expensive than a Pentax 645D by good margin. I'm sure the Pentax 67 is a wonderful tool for acquiring

Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

Sun Jan 2 09:58:35 CST 2011 John Sessoms wrote: From: Jens of selling it) I need results that show, that the 67 delivers reslults re-sluts? ;-) Try shooting the K7 through a pair of pantyhose. That will impose a I see now why such a suggestion was given. :-) :-) Cheers, Igor

Re: Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

Try shooting the K7 through a pair of pantyhose. That's not legal in Virginia. ;-) On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:58 AM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote: From: Jens Thank you all for you rinterest in responding and answering my question. I have done some samll tests, that didin't turn

Re: Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

Sides, you'd have to take them off to do that..I'm guessing here, of course! Jack --- On Sun, 1/2/11, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote: From: Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml

Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

On 1/2/2011 1:32 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote: Try shooting the K7 through a pair of pantyhose. That's not legal in Virginia. ;-) You sure you mean Virginia. On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:58 AM, John Sessomsjsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote: From: Jens Thank you all for you rinterest in

Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

I keep checking in on 'em from time to time, but so far the only 4x5 film they've got is some expired Type 57. It looks like they're concentrating on films for the SX-70 type cameras so far. Supposedly they've made an 20x24 SX-70 type process film that works in the big Polaroid camera, and

Re: Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

Thank you all for you rinterest in responding and answering my question. I have done some samll tests, that didin't turn out too well. But I was using old film and a questionable lab for developing. My result is shown at flickr. I photographed a sitting girl (in full figure) filling out the frame

Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

I'm surprised the K7 pic is as sharp as it is, given that it was shot at f13, where you're going to get a lot of diffusion. Try it at f5.6 or so. What stop did you shoot the 6x7 pic at. And what lens. You list an 80/2.8. I assume you mean the 90/2.8? Paul On Jan 1, 2011, at 2:07 PM, Jens

Re: Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

I'm not sure Paul, but since it a studio recording done at appr. the same time, I guess it the same aperture - F 13 or perhaps F11. Next time I shall: 1. Make sure the conditions are very close to being exactly the same. 2. Use new 120 film (Kodak Ektar 100 or Fuji Astia 100) 3. Use a pro-lab

Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

On Jan 1, 2011, at 2:27 PM, Jens wrote: I'm not sure Paul, but since it a studio recording done at appr. the same time, I guess it the same aperture - F 13 or perhaps F11. Next time I shall: 1. Make sure the conditions are very close to being exactly the same. 2. Use new 120 film

Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

On 1/1/2011 9:07 PM, Jens wrote: In my small, not too well done ,test it seems that the K-7 is doing rather well. In order to convince myself, that I should keep on using the 67 (insted of selling it) I need results that show, that the 67 delivers reslults that are superior to those of the K-7.

Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

Hello list I'm getting into photographing with Pentax 67. BTW: I just got the SMC 1:4 165 mm Leaf Shutter lens for studio work. Nice lens :-). Has anyone done tests, showing the resolution etc. of 6x7 film images compared to digital 14-15 Mp images, please? Regards Jens -- Treat others

Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

I'm getting into photographing with Pentax 67. BTW: I just got the SMC 1:4 165 mm Leaf Shutter lens for studio work. Nice lens :-). Has anyone done tests, showing the resolution etc. of 6x7 film images compared to digital 14-15 Mp images, please? Regards Jens -- Treat others as you

Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

There is no fair resolution comparison because the systems are so different. There is chemical information on a larger negative wich cannot be duplicated on digital because it is simply not present. Likewise, digital information takes to enlargement much better than does film (in most

Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Jens p...@planfoto.dk wrote: Hello list I'm getting into photographing with Pentax 67. BTW: I just got the SMC 1:4 165 mm Leaf Shutter lens for studio work. Nice lens :-). Has anyone done tests, showing the resolution etc. of 6x7 film images compared to digital 14-15 Mp

Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

of it to be worth the money, even at the current $600-700 price level. On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Jens p...@planfoto.dk wrote: Hello list I'm getting into photographing with Pentax 67. BTW: I just got the SMC 1:4 165 mm Leaf Shutter lens for studio work. Nice lens :-). Has anyone done

Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

, Jens p...@planfoto.dk wrote: Hello list I'm getting into photographing with Pentax 67. BTW: I just got the SMC 1:4 165 mm Leaf Shutter lens for studio work. Nice lens :-). Has anyone done tests, showing the resolution etc. of 6x7 film images compared to digital 14-15 Mp images, please

Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

got one, I doubt I'd get enough use out of it to be worth the money, even at the current $600-700 price level. On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Jens p...@planfoto.dk wrote: Hello list I'm getting into photographing with Pentax 67. BTW: I just got the SMC 1:4 165 mm Leaf Shutter lens

Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

I am with Collin here. It is really a question without an answer. I mean - it just depends. If you have a drum scanner nearby with highly trained operator, then you can produce amazing amount of information and tremendous enlargements from your 6x7 negative. For the references, several years

RE: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Bob Sullivan Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 11:44 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital Godfrey, Along the same lines as your commentary... I've loved 35mm slides and projected

Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

one, I doubt I'd get enough use out of it to be worth the money, even at the current $600-700 price level. On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Jens p...@planfoto.dk wrote: Hello list I'm getting into photographing with Pentax 67. BTW: I just got the SMC 1:4 165 mm Leaf Shutter lens for studio

Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

Thinking about it further, the real and only reason to shoot with Medium Format film today is, for me, to work with the very different coupling of Field of View and Depth of Field it affords compared to small-format (FourThirds, APS-C and so-called full frame) digital cameras. -- Godfrey  

Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

On 12/31/2010 7:30 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: Thinking about it further, the real and only reason to shoot with Medium Format film today is, for me, to work with the very different coupling of Field of View and Depth of Field it affords compared to small-format (FourThirds, APS-C and so-called

RE: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

From: J.C. O'Connell ever seen an 8x10 fujichrome on a light table? absolutely mindblowing image quality. It was discontinued about the time I was born, but Kodachrome used to be available as sheet film. I've seen 8x10 Kodachrome that just knocked my eyes out. About the best I've been

Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

the money, even at the current $600-700 price level. On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Jens p...@planfoto.dk wrote: Hello list I'm getting into photographing with Pentax 67. BTW: I just got the SMC 1:4 165 mm Leaf Shutter lens for studio work. Nice lens :-). Has anyone done tests, showing

Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

with Pentax 67. BTW: I just got the SMC 1:4 165 mm Leaf Shutter lens for studio work. Nice lens :-). Has anyone done tests, showing the resolution etc. of 6x7 film images compared to digital 14-15 Mp images, please? Regards Jens -- Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself

RE: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

] On Behalf Of Godfrey DiGiorgi Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 2:49 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital Your vast Age is irrelevant. ;-) My point was that I'm very familiar with how medium format film looks and how I prefer to view

Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

The Impossible Project is supposedly working on reincarnating 4x5 and 8x10 Poloroid sheet films. On 12/31/2010 1:15 PM, John Sessoms wrote: From: J.C. O'Connell ever seen an 8x10 fujichrome on a light table? absolutely mindblowing image quality. It was discontinued about the time I was

Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

Jens wrote: Hello list I'm getting into photographing with Pentax 67. BTW: I just got the SMC 1:4 165 mm Leaf Shutter lens for studio work. Nice lens :-). Has anyone done tests, showing the resolution etc. of 6x7 film images compared to digital 14-15 Mp images, please? I've never done any

Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

I would like that. I have a 4x5 polaroid back for my speed graphic. The pics were actually 3 1/2 x 41/2, if I recall. Fun, but expensive. Paul On Dec 31, 2010, at 3:51 PM, P. J. Alling wrote: The Impossible Project is supposedly working on reincarnating 4x5 and 8x10 Poloroid sheet films.

Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

On 12/31/2010 8:58 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: I was shooting prints before you were a 'twinkle in your parent's eyes. Mark! Gee, that's an expression I should memorize... Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the

Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

On 12/31/2010 10:23 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote: MF or LF on a light table rules! I remember light table reviewing some of the Jostein's fine 645 slides back in 2004. It was literally an eye-opening experience. You will have to believe me that Jostein was a darn good shooter 6 years ago. He

Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital

Boris, It's an old saying in English, designed to keep the young from getting too pompous about how smart they are. Regards, Bob S. On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote: On 12/31/2010 8:58 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: I was shooting prints before you were a

Re: Re: Enablement: Pentax 67

Hi Guys I managed to get e reasonable price on a 300mm f4 for the Pentax 67. I'll probably receive it on Monday :-) This focal lengt is not so desireable, but nice for fashion shots on location - outdoors (of which I've done none, yet). Is it rally as bad as they say? My next purchase

  1   2   3   4   >