n the background.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Walt Gilbert
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, April 1, 2012 7:42 AM
Subject: Re: Which one is stronger
On 4/1/2012 4:06 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
> Here are my slightly less frivolous photos from the photo walk.
>
>
On 4/1/2012 4:06 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
Here are my slightly less frivolous photos from the photo walk.
I think I have a keeper in this set, but I'm not sure which one it is, 191,
192, or 194. They are three slightly different treatments of the same subject,
and there are things that I
> >>
> >> http://www.flickriver.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157629349397638/
> >>
> >> Comments and suggestions on which is the keeper and why, or how to
> >> improve them are appreciated.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
> >>
> >
>
> > None of them particularly stand
On Apr 1, 2012, at 2:34 AM, Bob W wrote:
>>
>> Here are my slightly less frivolous photos from the photo walk.
>>
>> I think I have a keeper in this set, but I'm not sure which one it is,
>> 191, 192, or 194. They are three slightly different treatments of
>
> Here are my slightly less frivolous photos from the photo walk.
>
> I think I have a keeper in this set, but I'm not sure which one it is,
> 191, 192, or 194. They are three slightly different treatments of the
> same subject, and there are things that I like about
Here are my slightly less frivolous photos from the photo walk.
I think I have a keeper in this set, but I'm not sure which one it is, 191,
192, or 194. They are three slightly different treatments of the same subject,
and there are things that I like about each of them:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Thibouille wrote:
> Thank you all for your thoughts.
> Will look at the links provided and certainly use other informations you gave.
> Hope I can manage to get this project real.
>
> As for film is dead as Godfrey says, I think not. But darkroom though
> might soo
Thank you all for your thoughts.
Will look at the links provided and certainly use other informations you gave.
Hope I can manage to get this project real.
As for film is dead as Godfrey says, I think not. But darkroom though
might soon be indeed (what a pity).
APX100 @ 2.5€ per film (36 shots) is
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Thibouille wrote:
> I slowly convinced myself I needed to try a Leica (was hard actually).
> I don't wanna try alternatives *before* the M, if the M is nice but
> doesn't justify the cost, I'll look into Voigtlander and such.
>
> So, fot those who indeed shot with
Light meters are for sissies.
On Feb 23, 2012, at 10:21 AM, Thibouille wrote:
> I slowly convinced myself I needed to try a Leica (was hard actually).
> I don't wanna try alternatives *before* the M, if the M is nice but
> doesn't justify the cost, I'll look into Voigtlander and such.
>
> So, fo
> I slowly convinced myself I needed to try a Leica (was hard actually).
> I don't wanna try alternatives *before* the M, if the M is nice but
> doesn't justify the cost, I'll look into Voigtlander and such.
>
> So, fot those who indeed shot with an M, what should I look for?
> Buying new is out o
Thibouille wrote on Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:21:15 -0800
> I slowly convinced myself I needed to try a Leica (was hard actually).
> I don't wanna try alternatives *before* the M, if the M is nice but
> doesn't justify the cost, I'll look into Voigtlander and such.
>
> So, fot those who indeed shot wit
Thank you. I was suspecting such an answer, and I admit I'm very happy
with it :)
Less money, and I'll be forced to train my meter so to say.
May Kodak live long enough for my Tri-X needs.
2012/2/23 p. j. alling :
> If you're using film, forget about a meter with a Leica and learn the
> character
I bought both of my thread-mount Leicas on ebay. No problem if you only deal
with people who have numerous sales and a 100% rating. If you buy a meterless
Leica, you can get a meter that attaches to the flash shoe or use a handheld
meter. A handheld incident meter is superior to most in-camera
If you're using film, forget about a meter with a Leica and learn the
characteristics of Tri-X, Most of my shooting with the Spotmatic II
and Tri-X was well beyond the metering capability of the camera. In
fact the first time I had a camera who's meter was even close to as
good as a trained eye wa
I slowly convinced myself I needed to try a Leica (was hard actually).
I don't wanna try alternatives *before* the M, if the M is nice but
doesn't justify the cost, I'll look into Voigtlander and such.
So, fot those who indeed shot with an M, what should I look for?
Buying new is out of the questi
On 22 October 2010 14:43, frank theriault wrote:
>
> Hmmm...
>
> Interesting that you revived this thread today. I'm looking at the
> title Mark mentions, then I realize that I posted "Cormorants at Dawn"
> last week - a week after Mark's initial post.
>
> I guess I was subliminally inspired.
>
>
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Miserere wrote:
>
> How about I ask your girlfriend? Ah, right, *that's* why you're not
> responsible.
>
> Frank, my hero.
Hmmm...
Interesting that you revived this thread today. I'm looking at the
title Mark mentions, then I realize that I posted "Cormorants
On 5 October 2010 18:24, frank theriault wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>> I was just voting on photos for the Pentax Photo Gallery and what
>> should come up but a shot titled "Cormorants at Sunset"...
>>
>
> I'm not responsible.
>
> In any way.
>
> Just ask my wife
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> I was just voting on photos for the Pentax Photo Gallery and what
> should come up but a shot titled "Cormorants at Sunset"...
>
I'm not responsible.
In any way.
Just ask my wife.
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept."
On 5/10/10, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I expect we'll be reading this again on New Year's Day...
Mark!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDM
> Mark Roberts wrote:
> > I was just voting on photos for the Pentax Photo Gallery and what
> > should come up but a shot titled "Cormorants at Sunset"...
> >
> >
> >
>
> I think if it was one of us, it would say "Cormorants (Official Bird of
the
> PDML[tm]. All Rights Reserved. Do Not Fold, Spind
Doug Brewer wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
I was just voting on photos for the Pentax Photo Gallery and what
should come up but a shot titled "Cormorants at Sunset"...
I think if it was one of us, it would say "Cormorants (Official Bird of
the PDML[tm]. All Rights Reserved. Do Not Fold, Spindle,
Mark Roberts wrote:
I was just voting on photos for the Pentax Photo Gallery and what
should come up but a shot titled "Cormorants at Sunset"...
I think if it was one of us, it would say "Cormorants (Official Bird of
the PDML[tm]. All Rights Reserved. Do Not Fold, Spindle, or Mutilate.
Sub
I'm responsible only if, ironically, the shot contains no actual
cormorants.
On 10/4/2010 6:08 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I was just voting on photos for the Pentax Photo Gallery and what
should come up but a shot titled "Cormorants at Sunset"...
--
"His lack of education is more than compe
I was just voting on photos for the Pentax Photo Gallery and what
should come up but a shot titled "Cormorants at Sunset"...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follo
Well at least they took the liquor, maybe in their stomach based on what
was stolen.
On 4/28/2010 2:53 PM, CheekyGeek wrote:
Have we any PDML members that were in the Alnwick-Haldimand Township,
ONTARIO late on April 26th?
If so, I hope you have a good alibi:
"On the 26th April 2010 at approxi
Have we any PDML members that were in the Alnwick-Haldimand Township,
ONTARIO late on April 26th?
If so, I hope you have a good alibi:
"On the 26th April 2010 at approximately 11:02pm, the Northumberland
OPP was dispatched to a break and enter to a trailer located on
Shelter Valley Road in Alnwick
On Aug 28, 2008, at 5:24 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>> When I was shooting with a 6x7, I used both a spotmeter and incident
>> meter. Actually, I used the incident meter most often. You really
>> need both. When the light on the subject is the same as where you're
>> standing
Paul Stenquist wrote:
> When I was shooting with a 6x7, I used both a spotmeter and incident
> meter. Actually, I used the incident meter most often. You really
> need both. When the light on the subject is the same as where you're
> standing, the incident meter is best. When it varies or whe
After digging into list archives, i found 2 years old thread with
similar subject.
These old Pentax spotmeters look little bit bulky :D
So i have to find sweet spot between functionality, price and size.
Anything beyound of size like box of cigarettes is too much.
It is nice, if you can pack all
I totally agree. That was why I went with a meter that
combined both. My first experiences with hand held
meters, all incident, was in film school. Back then I
used the Sekonic Studio Deluxe analog model, a great
little meter. Later I got the Minolta IV-F digital
which made things go a bit faster.
When I was shooting with a 6x7, I used both a spotmeter and incident
meter. Actually, I used the incident meter most often. You really
need both. When the light on the subject is the same as where you're
standing, the incident meter is best. When it varies or when you have
to quantify a hig
I found an old Soligor spotmeter at the thrift store
the other day. It was in ok condition, but I didn't
buy it since I didn't have a 9v battery to test it.
They only wanted $15 for it so they can be had cheaply
if you look around. More likely though you'll be
paying 50-100 dollars for one dependin
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Cirvis
> Sent: 28 August 2008 12:44
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Spotmeter - which one to buy?
>
> Hi all,
>
> recently i managed to make my own battery pack for Pentax 6x7.
> Thanks for help from list, and good web re
Hi all,
recently i managed to make my own battery pack for Pentax 6x7.
Thanks for help from list, and good web resources.
Im going very soon to do some walks and climbs in Italian/Swiss Alps,
and i seriously consider to give a chance to 6x7.
Then i need some external meter. I can gen one from e
> http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/OrlandoandMoon.jpg
>
> http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/Get-the-Shota.jpg
>
> I am in a quandry for next months Open Competition for the Camera Club.
> Which one would you choose.?
>
> Walt
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-D
One with the moon seems stronger.
Boris
Walter Hamler wrote:
> http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/OrlandoandMoon.jpg
>
> http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/Get-the-Shota.jpg
>
> I am in a quandry for next months Open Competition for the Camera Cl
s/v699/newtmaker/Get-the-Shota.jpg
>
> I am in a quandry for next months Open Competition
> for the Camera Club.
> Which one would you choose.?
>
> Walt
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
Club.
Which one would you choose.?
Walt
==
The first is lovely, but the moon looks unreal. Too big. So I'd choose the
second.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
-
Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be cen
r next months Open Competition for the Camera
> Club. Which one would you choose.?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
/newtmaker/Get-the-Shota.jpg
>
> I am in a quandry for next months Open Competition for the Camera
> Club.
> Which one would you choose.?
>
> Walt
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
___
Thanks guys. I was leaning toward the first one as well. I have it already
printed and matted, and the horizon is corrected in the print :-)
The second one is one I will save for a later competition that may have a
theme better suited to that shot.
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@
xt months Open Competition for the Camera Club.
WH> Which one would you choose.?
WH> Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
g.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/OrlandoandMoon.jpg
>
> http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/Get-the-Shota.jpg
>
> I am in a quandry for next months Open Competition for the Camera Club.
> Which one would you choose.?
>
> Walt
>
> --
> PDML Pent
Walter Hamler wrote:
> http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/OrlandoandMoon.jpg
>
> http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/Get-the-Shota.jpg
>
> I am in a quandry for next months Open Competition for the Camera Club.
> Which one would you choose.?
>
>
ket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/Get-the-Shota.jpg
>
> I am in a quandry for next months Open Competition for the Camera Club.
> Which one would you choose.?
>
> Walt
>
>
--
Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf
thurmodynamiks aand itz
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/OrlandoandMoon.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/Get-the-Shota.jpg
I am in a quandry for next months Open Competition for the Camera Club.
Which one would you choose.?
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
I like the the way the face is in the b&w, but it took me several
seconds to find the neck, so it was a very bizarre picture at first :)
To me the color is easier to see what is going on, but I still like
the b&w anyway
russ
On 2/28/07, Walter Hamler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://img.photo
In a message dated 2/28/2007 6:26:31 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/GirraffeBWweb.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/GirraffeFeedingweb.jpg
My Giraffee shot, one in B&W, one in Color.
Comments apprecia
The color version definitely works better for me.
Dan M
On 2/28/07, Charles Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 28, 2007, at 20:22, Walter Hamler wrote:
>
> > http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/GirraffeBWweb.jpg
> >
> > http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/
> >
On Feb 28, 2007, at 20:22, Walter Hamler wrote:
> http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/GirraffeBWweb.jpg
>
> http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/
> GirraffeFeedingweb.jpg
>
> My Giraffee shot, one in B&W, one in Color.
>
Color. Can't say why other than that the B&W look
A Gestalt moment...
(the whole is greater than the sum of its parts)
The head looks disembodied...over all the color version somehow makes
better "sense" of the context (apart from the title). The quality of
the b&w is superb but it took me a nanosecond longer to get a sense of
what is going on..
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/GirraffeBWweb.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/GirraffeFeedingweb.jpg
My Giraffee shot, one in B&W, one in Color.
Comments appreciated.
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdm
Hi!
You'll find what you need in the links:
Indeed.
When I said the 50/2.8 was better than the 105/2.8 I should have said
marginally. But it is highly desirable for macros of insects and small
animals or reptiles when you can't really get right up to them -- as you
need to do with the 50mm
The best Macro 50mm ever made was probably
the Kern 50/1.8 Macro Switar which focussed
to 1:1 without any tubes. If there was a way
of using this lens on an *ist D with minor
modification I'd be in the market for one
right now.
Don
jtainter wrote:
Boris, I have never heard criticism of a 5
Boris, I have never heard criticism of a 50 or 100 mm macro lens for optical
performance. It seems to be a simple matter to design for good performance.
Still, some are, of course, better than others.
KEH right now has several of the FA 50 F2.8 Macro -- marked down. Take a look
at Boz's comment
I've got this lens as a Phoenix, manual focus.
Build quality is nothing to write home about, but it's light
and gets the job done. It came with a two element diopter that I now
use on the M 100 f4 macro. For the price, the Phoenix is good value.
I've used it at f3.5 to 5.6 for portraits and have
Don,
> ... I've used a lot of
> Macros and now have the Sigma 50/2.8 EX It's
> about the best there is at the moment,
> slightly superior to their very nice 105/2.8 EX.
Mind if I asked you to elaborate on exactly how 50/2.8 is superior to
105/2.8? Also if you had used Pentax FA 50/2.8 macro, how
Hi!
> I suspect Boris may want AF for when he is using the lens for normal work.
That's exactly right.
--
Boris
I forgot to mention the aperture for the test
shot -- it was 3.5
Don
John Forbes wrote:
I suspect Boris may want AF for when he is using the lens for normal work.
I have things the wrong way around. My 100mm macro is the FA 100 2.8,
and for a smaller, more portable, 100mm lens, I have the M
I suspect Boris may want AF for when he is using the lens for normal work.
I have things the wrong way around. My 100mm macro is the FA 100 2.8, and
for a smaller, more portable, 100mm lens, I have the M 2.8.
It would be better if the M was AF, and vice-versa.
John
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:4
Hi Boris,
I've tested the Sigma 50/2.8 EX Macro with a
Tokina Doubler and have posted a picture here:
http://www.kolumbus.fi/mimosa/hold/EX50X2.tif
Make of it what you will.
It's Rob Studdert's printable version of the
USAF test chart and I personally don't know
what to make of it either.
Hi Boris,
I don't think AF will help much with macro
photography. I've done a lot of this and the
best results I get are with through focus
series and stacking with either Helicon Focus
or CombZ. But if this doesn't appeal to you
you can select the best one from your series
and dump the oth
Hello Boris,
My daughter has that one - actually she has the Phoenix version. They
are all made by Cosina. The lens is light and small and optically it
is pretty good. But the build quality is pretty plasticky. The manual focus
feel is about average for an undamped AF lens. AF speed is ok.
If
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Boris Liberman wrote:
A Russian Penta Club member approached me asking to sell him my Tamron 90/2.5
lens. I agreed. Same reason - unfortunately the lens is manual focus.
Boris,
I think/fear you will struggle with an AF Macro lens. Assuming that
it's for inanimate objects
Hi!
A Russian Penta Club member approached me asking to sell him my Tamron
90/2.5 lens. I agreed. Same reason - unfortunately the lens is manual focus.
I am thinking of replacement. KEH has now very good variety of macro
lenses at rather reasonable prices. Say, Sigma 50/2.8 EX macro goes for
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 5:16 AM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Pentax Digital P&S: which one?
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> >
> > Having not tried any of the others, I&#
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
>
> Having not tried any of the others, I'm still a big fan of the 550.
> Since the 550 is no longer made, I'd recommend looking at whatever
successor
> is currently available. It was replaced by the 555, if memory serves. Is
that
> curr
Quoting Andre Langevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> A friend wants to buy a Pentax digital P&S. What is the best one
> overall (considering resolution, flare, noise, handling)?
>
> To me, S5i seems a good one.
>
> Andre
>
>
Having not tried any of the others, I'm still a big fan of the 550.
Sinc
A friend wants to buy a Pentax digital P&S. What is the best one
overall (considering resolution, flare, noise, handling)?
To me, S5i seems a good one.
Andre
You have got too strong hands!?
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 26. januar 2005 23:43
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: Adaptall 2 for Pentax, which one ?
Fred mused
Fred mused:
>
> > personally, I found the KA version less reliable, because often the
> > contacts were just a tiny bit off and didn't make proper contact. It
> > sure freaked me out when suddently I couldn't take a photo. I threw it
> > out afterwards. Having to rotate the lens a bit on/off to be
> personally, I found the KA version less reliable, because often the
> contacts were just a tiny bit off and didn't make proper contact. It
> sure freaked me out when suddently I couldn't take a photo. I threw it
> out afterwards. Having to rotate the lens a bit on/off to be able to
> get a photog
Somehow I do not think many of those
folks are lurking on the list. BTW, even here in the Boone-docks I see
more and more people chimping their cel-phones; I do believe that is what
is going to replace disposable cameras.
The Kodak Picture Maker kiosk has the ability to print via IR from cell
p
ras.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Jens Bladt"
Subject: RE: Adaptall 2 for Pentax, which one ?
The good thing about shooting didg
On 24/1/05, Jens Bladt, discombobulated, unleashed:
>The good thing about shooting didgatal is that, if the exposure is wrong,
>you''l find out.
Mark!!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
- Original Message -
From: "Jens Bladt"
Subject: RE: Adaptall 2 for Pentax, which one ?
The good thing about shooting didgatal is that, if the exposure is
wrong,
you''l find out.
Heck, Jens, I found that out all the time shooting film.
William Robb
out
on my 'ist D before relying on it for film cameras.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: m.s.gill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 23. januar 2005 14:27
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: Adaptall 2 for Pentax, whic
i have two tamron adapters K and KA and long list of tamron lenses.Whenever
i put prime/zooms with KA adapter on MZ5 lens locked at minimum AE,
received over
exposure in programme mode the reason combination of aperture leafes and
shutter. Few years back Tamron introduced a P adapter for program Ca
My 300/5.6 Tamron with the A Adaptall-2 mount works just fine on my Super
Program.
Collin
"You impress at a distance, but you impact a life up close. The closer the
relationship the greater the impact."
Howard Hendricks
Hi,
personally, I found the KA version less reliable, because often the
contacts were just a tiny bit off and didn't make proper contact. It
sure freaked me out when suddently I couldn't take a photo. I threw it
out afterwards. Having to rotate the lens a bit on/off to be able to
get a photograph
K/A
Make sure you get a promise for return. They can be faulty with it
being obvious.
mike
Jens Bladt wrote:
Do any of you know which Adaptall mount I should look for, if I want to use
a Tamron lens that will allow for uisng shutter priority or programed AE on
a "A"-series body, perhaps even on
Jens Bladt wrote:
> Sat, 22 Jan 2005 02:32:09 -0800
> Do any of you know which Adaptall mount I should look for, if I want to se
> a Tamron lens that will allow for using shutter priority or programed AE
on
> a "A"-series body, perhaps even on the *ist D (provided I use a "A-series
> Tamron lens")
Do any of you know which Adaptall mount I should look for, if I want to use
a Tamron lens that will allow for uisng shutter priority or programed AE on
a "A"-series body, perhaps even on the *ist D (provided I use a "A-series
Tamron lens")?
It seems there are more than one Adaptall 2 mount (R1 and
0 dpi) ?
Thibouille
Collin R Brendemuehl a écrit :
At 02:52 2004.12.08 -0500, you wrote:
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 08:34:50 +0100
From: Thibs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Scanner: which one?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; form
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Scanner: which one?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I'm looking for a scanner.
I'm very budget limited so it'll probably be flatbed one.
8400F is about US$140 at BHPHOTO.. in NYC. Anyone using the
more expensive 9950F?
Otis Wright
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Thibs wrote on 08.12.04 8:34:
I'm looking for a scanner.
I'm very budget limited so it'll probably be flatbed one.
I know Canon do affordable (almost) flatbeds with
Thibs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm looking for a scanner.
>I'm very budget limited so it'll probably be flatbed one.
>I know Canon do affordable (almost) flatbeds with film back.
>
>Of course it is nowhere near a film scanner but I do not expect it to.
>I absolutely need a normal scanner. Film
Thibs wrote on 08.12.04 8:34:
> I'm looking for a scanner.
> I'm very budget limited so it'll probably be flatbed one.
> I know Canon do affordable (almost) flatbeds with film back.
>
> Of course it is nowhere near a film scanner but I do not expect it to.
> I absolutely need a normal scanner. Fi
At 02:52 2004.12.08 -0500, you wrote:
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 08:34:50 +0100
From: Thibs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Scanner: which one?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I&#
I'm looking for a scanner.
I'm very budget limited so it'll probably be flatbed one.
I know Canon do affordable (almost) flatbeds with film back.
Of course it is nowhere near a film scanner but I do not expect it to.
I absolutely need a normal scanner. Film one may follow if budget does too.
Any cl
- Original Message -
From: Lon Williamson
Subject: Re: SV: Prime portrait lenses - which one?
> William Robb: trainer of dogs and models.
> Is there a correlation between the two? Youth
> wants to know!
Positive reinforcment, my friend.
And never ask either to do more tha
William Robb: trainer of dogs and models.
Is there a correlation between the two? Youth
wants to know!
William Robb wrote:
...
When I am training a new model, I start with 35mm and work through to
medium format, and then large format over several sessions before I
expect to get anything good from
Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
Every bride has a concept of what a
bride should look like, but doesn't realize that the marketed bride
image is that of professional models.
Knowing your veneration to "professional" everything... did you get a
professional bride too ?
cheers,
caveman
This is why the people skills of a photographer are very important for
things like wedding photography. Every bride has a concept of what a
bride should look like, but doesn't realize that the marketed bride
image is that of professional models.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Non professional s
- Original Message -
From: Caveman
Subject: Re: SV: Prime portrait lenses - which one?
>
> > Non professional subjects tend to be intimidated by large equipment.
>
> I sense a lewd something here ;-)
You would.
William Robb
William Robb wrote:
Non professional subjects tend to be intimidated by large equipment.
I sense a lewd something here ;-)
cheers,
caveman
- Original Message -
From: Andre Langevin
Subject: Re: SV: Prime portrait lenses - which one?
>
> The A85/1.4 hood is monstrous also, but with a cooler shade, the lens
> is not that frightening I think. A nice hood I found for it is the
> one for the Hexanon 85-210/3.5.
The time that I still had my FA*85/1.4, everyone was frightened
whenever I point that damn thing at them. Everyone of them were
amazed by how big the hood was. No such problem with the 77. :-)
regards,
Alan Chan
You mean dogs bark at the f1.4 lens but keep quiet when you shoot
them with the f2
1 - 100 of 323 matches
Mail list logo
